DOCSLIB.ORG

Transpacific Services in Oakland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transpacific Services in Oakland Transpacific Services in Oakland THE Alliance Hapag-Lloyd, K-Line, MOL, NYK, Yang Ming Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 APL JPX CMA-CGM FUJI Kobe–Nagoya–Tokyo–Sendai–San Pedro Bay– Hapag–Lloyd OICT K Line Oakland–Tokyo–Nagoya–Kobe–Sendai PS1 MOL NYK 2 COSCO Shipping PSW3 K Line Kobe–Nagoya–Shimizu–Tokyo–San Pedro Bay– MOL TRAPAC PS2 Oakland–Tokyo–Kobe–Nagoya–Shimizu NYK Yang Ming 3 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Singapore–Laem Chabang–Cai Mep–Hong Kong– MOL PS3 TRAPAC San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Tokyo–Hong Kong– NYK Singapore–Laem Chabang–Cai Mep Yang Ming 4 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Hong Kong–Yantian–Kaohsiung–Keelung– MOL PS4 OICT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Keelung–Kaohsiung– NYK Da Chan Bay/Shenzen–Hong Kong–Yantian Yang Ming 5 Hapag–Lloyd K Line MOL PS5 OICT Shanghai–Ningbo–San Pedro Bay–Oakland NYK Yang Ming 6 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Qingdao–Ningbo–Shanghai–Busan–San Pedro Bay– MOL PS6 TRAPAC NYK Oakland–Busan–Qingdao–Ningbo–Shanghai Yang Ming 7 K Line Dalian–Xingang–Qingdao–Busan–San Pedro Bay– MOL PS8 TRAPAC Oakland–Busan–Kwangyang–Dalian–Xingang– NYK Yang Ming Qingdao 8 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Tokyo–Kobe–Ningbo–Shanghai–Busan– MOL EC1 WB TRAPAC NYK San Pedro Bay–Oakland Yang Ming 2M Maersk, MSC Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 Maersk TP8 Xingang–Qingdao–Ningbo–Busan–Yokohama– OICT MSC ORIENT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vostochny–Xingang 2 Maersk TP2 Tanjung Pelepas–Cai Mep–Yantian–Shanghai– MSC JAGUAR OICT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vostochny–Busan– Shanghai–Ningbo–Chiwan–Singapore Bolded Carrier(s) operates the majority of vessel within the service route. April 1, 2017 Transpacific Services in Oakland,continued Ocean CMA-CGM/APL, COSCO Shipping, Evergreen, OOCL Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 APL NWX CMA-CGM BOHAI Xingang–Qingdao–Shanghai–Prince Rupert– COSCO Shipping CEN OICT San Pedro Bay–Oakland Evergreen CEN OOCL PCN1 2 APL CC5 CMA-CGM HBB Qingdao–Shanghai–Ningbo–San Pedro Bay– NUTTER COSCO Shipping AAC2 Oakland–Tokyo–Nagoya–Qingdao–Shanghai–Ningbo Evergreen CPS 3 APL SC8 Yantian–Hong Kong–Kaohsiung–Taipei– CMA-CGM JDX NUTTER San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Tacoma–Kaohsiung– COSCO Shipping AAS4 Yantian–Hong Kong–Taipei Evergreen TPS 4 CMA-CGM GEX Taipei–Xiamen–Shekou–Yantian–San Pedro Bay– COSCO Shipping AAS3 NUTTER Oakland Evergreen HTW 5 APL PRX CMA-CGM PRX COSCO Shipping AAS2 Fuqing–Nansha–Hong Kong–Yantian–Xiamen– OICT Evergreen PRX San Pedro Bay–Oakland OOCL PCS1 Wan Hai CP3 6 APL PE1 CMA-CGM JAX Port Klang–Singapore–Jakarta–Laem Chabang– COSCO Shipping SEA2 OICT Cai Mep–San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Hong Kong– Evergreen PE1 Cai Mep–Singapore–Port Klang–Colombo OOCL SEAP Non-alliance Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 COSCO Shipping AAC3 Qingdao–Shanghai–Ningbo–San Pedro Bay– PIL ACS OICT Oakland Wan Hai CP2 2 APL Naha–Shanghai–Qingdao–Busan–San Pedro Bay– EX1 OICT Oakland–Dutch Harbor–Yokohama–Busan–Naha 3 Hyundai PS2 Laem Chabang–Cai Mep–Hong Kong–Yantian– MSC LOTUS OICT Kaohsiung–Busan–San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Busan– Kaohsiung–Hong Kong–Laem Chabang–Cai Mep April 1, 2017 North Europe & Mediterranean Services in Oakland THE Alliance Hapag-Lloyd, K-Line, MOL, NYK, Yang Ming Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 CMA-CGM California Bridge Hapag–Lloyd Le Havre–Antwerp–Hamburg–Rotterdam– K Line OICT Southampton–San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Tacoma– MOL AL5 WB Vancouver NYK Yang Ming 2 APL ECX CMA-CGM California Bridge Tacoma–Vancouver–Oakland–San Pedro Bay– Hapag–Lloyd OICT Balboa–Cartagena–Caucedo–Southampton– K Line AL5 EB Rotterdam–Hamburg–Antwerp–Le Havre MOL NYK Non-alliance Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 MSC Gioia Tauro–Civitavecchia–La Spezia–Valencia–Sines– Cristobal–Balboa–Manzanillo MX–San Pedro Bay– California Express OICT Oakland–Vancouver–Seattle–Oakland– San Pedro Bay–Balboa–Cristobal–Gioia Tauro 2 CMA-CGM AZTECA Acajutla–Corinto–Buenaventura–San Lorenzo–Puerto WAMS Quetzal–Lázaro Cárdenas–San Pedro Bay–Oakland– Hamburg Sud OICT Lázaro Cárdenas–Puerto Quetzal–Acajutla–Corinto– Buenaventura–San Lorenzo 3 Hamburg Sud MCPS Cagliari–Livorno–Genoa–Fos–Barcelona– Hapag-Lloyd MPS Valencia–Tangier–Cartagena– Puerto Quetzal– Manzanillo–San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Seattle/ ZIM MPS OICT Tacoma–Vancouver–Manzanillo MX–Cartagena– Caucedo–Lisbon–Tangier–Valencia–Cagliari–Livorno– Genoa–Fos–Barcelona April 1, 2017 Latin America Services in Oakland THE Alliance Hapag-Lloyd, K-Line, MOL, NYK, Yang Ming Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Balboa–Cartagena–Caucedo–Southampton/ MOL AL5 WB London–Rotterdam–Hamburg–Antwerp–Le Havre– OICT NYK San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vancouver–Seattle/ Yang Ming Tacoma CMA-CGM California Bridge 2 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Southampton/London–Rotterdam–Hamburg– MOL AL5 EB NYK OICT Antwerp–Le Havre–Cartagena–San Pedro Bay– APL Oakland–Seattle/Tacoma–Vancouver CMA-CGM California Bridge 3 Hapag–Lloyd K Line MOL EC1 NB TRAPAC Manzanillo–Balboa–San Pedro Bay–Oakland NYK APL Non-alliance Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 MSC Gioia Tauro–Civitavecchia–La Spezia–Valencia–Sines– Cristobal–Balboa–Manzanillo MX–San Pedro Bay– California Express OICT Oakland–Vancouver–Seattle–Oakland– San Pedro Bay–Balboa–Cristobal–Gioia Tauro 2 CMA-CGM AZTECA Acajutla–Corinto–Buenaventura–San Lorenzo–Puerto WAMS Quetzal–Lázaro Cárdenas–San Pedro Bay–Oakland– Hamburg Sud OICT Lázaro Cárdenas–Puerto Quetzal–Acajutla–Corinto– Buenaventura–San Lorenzo 3 Hamburg Sud MCPS Cagliari–Livorno–Genoa–Fos–Barcelona– Hapag-Lloyd MPS Valencia–Tangier–Cartagena– Puerto Quetzal– Manzanillo–San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Seattle/ ZIM MPS OICT Tacoma–Vancouver–Manzanillo MX–Cartagena– Caucedo–Lisbon–Tangier–Valencia–Cagliari–Livorno– Genoa–Fos–Barcelona April 1, 2017 Oceania Services in Oakland Non-alliance Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 ANL PSW1 Hamburg Sud PANZ-PNW Auckland–Melbourne–Sydney–Tauranga–Papeete Hapag-Lloyd WAS OICT (fortnightly)–Oakland–San Pedro Bay PIL AOS MSC AUS LOOP 1 2 ANL PNW Fortnightly service: Tauranga–Sydney–Melbourne– Hamburg Sud PANZ-PSW OICT Adelaide–Auckland–Suva–Honolulu (every six Hapag-Lloyd WAN weeks)–Vancouver–Seattle–Oakland 3 Hamburg Sud SSEA Papeete–Nuku'alofa (monthly)–Apia–Pago Pago– OICT Polynesia Line POLYNESIA San Pedro Bay– Oakland Hawaii Services in Oakland Non-alliance Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 Matson Hawaii (1) Matson Honolulu–Oakland 2 Matson Hawaii (2) Matson Honolulu–San Pedro Bay–Oakland 3 Pasha CHX OICT Honolulu–Oakland–San Pedro Bay April 1, 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pathway to Zero Emissions CHE at the Port of Oakland
    Pathway to Zero Emissions CHE at the Port of Oakland Diane Heinze Environmental Supervisor Advanced Clean CHE: End-User Case Studies 8:30 a.m. D. Heinze Port of Oakland ACT Expo April 26, 2019 1 580 Some items not toscale MAGNETIC 14°11' 0 1/2 1 nautical mile BuildingLegend OCEAN CARRIER BY TERMINAL 0 1/2 1 mile 1 Impact Transportation (Buildings 807, 806,805) 0 1 kilometer 80 2 Port Transfer (Building804) TRAPACTERMINAL COSCO SHIPPING Lines 3 PCC Logistics (Building 803) - Customs Exam Station EBMUD Evergreen Line TerminalGates 4 Planned Site of port drayage truck Hapag - Lloyd fuel & service center Container Cranes (Port Owned) Ocean Network Express (ONE) 5 Port Truck CSC & Sea-Logix - 1425 MaritimeSt. * Yang Ming Line Container Cranes (TenantOwned) Toll Plaza City Truck Parking& (westboundonly) AncillaryServices 6 Shippers TransportExpress Cranes(Private) Northport 14 OverweightCorridor Beach 7 PacificTransload BEN E. NUTTERTERMINAL City OAB Area 8 GSCLogistics American President Lines (APL) PortScales AMNAVMaritime Tug Services 9 Unicold CMA CGM Shore PowerCapable 13 1 COSCO SHIPPING Lines 10 U.S. Customs and Border Protection 1 Evergreen Line A AdminBuildings Dredge * Materials 1 11 Port Harbor Facilities - 651 MaritimeSt. Rehandling 4 R RFID ServiceCenter Facility 12 Pacific LayberthingSouth 2 City OAB Area 13 ITS ConGlobal - WestBurma 12 R 3 OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL 14 OMSS CONTAINERTERMINAL 5 Port Truck Parking American President Lines (APL) & Ancillary Services * * ANL * CMA CGM 24 COSCO SHIPPING Lines Oakland * Evergreen Line Hamburg Süd B20-24 CenterPoint e Properties . * Hapag-Lloyd 1599 MaritimeSt. y w . * Hyundai Merchant Marine delin t (Available) t 980 Mandela Pk Union S S A * Maersk Line Turning * Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) STE * Ocean Network Express (ONE) 880 1,650 ft / 502.9 m * Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL) 1/2 6 7 8thSt.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaport Facilities
    SEAPORT FACILITIES 580 Some items not to scale MAGNETIC N 14° 11' 0 1/2 1 nautical mile Building Legend OCEAN CARRIER BY TERMINAL E 0 1/2 1 mile 1 Impact Transportation (Buildings 807, 806, 805) W 0 1/2 1 kilometer 80 2 Port Transfer (Building 804) TRAPAC TERMINAL S COSCO SHIPPING Lines 3 PCC Logistics (Building 803) - Customs Exam Station EBMUD Evergreen Line Terminal Gates 4 Planned Site of port drayage truck Hapag - Lloyd fuel & service center Container Cranes (Port Owned) Ocean Network Express (ONE) 5 Port Truck CSC & Sea-Logix - 1425 Maritime St. * Yang Ming Line Container Cranes (Tenant Owned) Toll Plaza City Truck Parking & (westbound only) Ancillary Services 6 Shippers Transport Express Cranes (Private) Northport 14 7 Overweight Corridor Beach Pacific Transload BEN E. NUTTER TERMINAL City OAB Area rologis 1 P 8 GSC Logistics West Grand A American President Lines (APL) Port Scales AMNAV Maritime v. Tug Services 9 Unicold CMA CGM 13 1 Shore Power Capable . rologis 3 9 P 10 COSCO SHIPPING Lines urma Rd U.S. Customs and Border Protection 8 ologis 2 1 West B 10 Dredge r Evergreen Line A Admin Buildings P 11 Materials 1 Port Harbor Facilities - 651 Maritime St. * Rehandling Facility 4 R RFID Service Center St. 12 Pacific Layberthing South 17th 2 City OAB Area 21 20 . 13 ITS ConGlobal - West Burma 12 3 d 7 22 R OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL 14 ridge tage R OMSS n CONTAINER TERMINAL X439 y B ro a F S 5 Pinnacle an Port Truck Parking P American President Lines (APL) Oakland B 14th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 72/Wednesday, April 14, 2004/Notices
    19852 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 72 / Wednesday, April 14, 2004 / Notices whether the proposed collection of paperwork implications. These are DC offices of the Commission, 800 information is necessary for the proper foreign ownership, substantial service, North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. performance of the functions of the and interference coordination. The Interested parties may submit comments Commission, including whether the foreign ownership and interference on an agreement to the Secretary, information shall have practical utility; requirements are only a one-time Federal Maritime Commission, (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s requirement unless the licensee’s Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance ownership changes or they change the of the date this notice appears in the the quality, utility and clarity of the service or equipment they are using. Federal Register. information collected; and (d) ways to The substantial service requirement Agreement No.: 011574–010. minimize the burden of the collection of would have to be made at the end of a Title: Pacific Islands Discussion information on the respondents, licensee’s license term. Agreement. including the use of automated Federal Communications Commission. Parties: P & O Nedlloyd Limited, Hamburg-Su¨ d, Polynesia Line Ltd., collection techniques or other forms of Marlene H. Dortch, information technology. FESCO Ocean Management Limited, Secretary. DATES: and Australia-New Zealand Direct Line. Written Paperwork Reduction [FR Doc. 04–8486 Filed 4–13–04; 8:45 am] (PRA) comments should be submitted Synopsis: The amendment revises the BILLING CODE 6712–01–P on or before June 14, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 3/Thursday, January
    528 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 3 / Thursday, January 4, 2018 / Notices CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics; and Street NW, #300, Washington, DC Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. 20036, [email protected], and Joshua (202) 694–1220. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; P. Stein, Cozen O’ Connor, 1200 19th Cozen O’Conner; 1200 Nineteenth Street Street NW, #300, Washington, DC Laura E. Sinram, NW; Washington, DC 20036. 20036, [email protected]. Deputy Secretary of the Commission. Synopsis: The amendment deletes Non-confidential filings may be [FR Doc. 2018–00057 Filed 1–2–18; 4:15 pm] Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. as a party submitted in hard copy to the Secretary BILLING CODE 6715–01–P to the Agreement. at the above address or by email as a By Order of the Federal Maritime PDF attachment to [email protected] Commission. and include in the subject line: P5–17 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Dated: December 29, 2017. (Commenter/Company). Confidential Rachel E. Dickon, filings should not be filed by email. A Notice of Agreements Filed confidential filing must be filed with the Assistant Secretary. The Commission hereby gives notice Secretary in hard copy only, and be [FR Doc. 2017–28485 Filed 1–3–18; 8:45 am] accompanied by a transmittal letter that of the filing of the following agreements BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P under the Shipping Act of 1984. identifies the filing as ‘‘Confidential- Interested parties may submit comments Restricted’’ and describes the nature and on the agreements to the Secretary, FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION extent of the confidential treatment Federal Maritime Commission, requested.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier Name SCAC Code ACL ACLU Alianca ANRM AML AKMR ANL ANNU APL APLU Arkas ARKU ARRC AROF Bahri NS
    Carrier Name (Abbreviated) Carrier Name SCAC code ACL Atlantic Container Line ACLU Alianca Alianca ANRM AML Alaska Marine Lines AKMR ANL Australia National Line ANNU APL American President Lines APLU Arkas Arkas Container Transport S.A. ARKU ARRC Atlantic Ro-Ro Carriers Inc AROF Bahri Bahri / National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia NSAU BCL Bermuda Container Line BCLU CGL Central Gulf Lines, Inc CEGL CCNI Compagnia Chilena de Navigacion Interoceanica SA CNIU CHIPOLBROK Chinese-Polish Joint Stock Shipping Company CPJQ CK Line CK Line CKLU Compagnie Maritime d Affretement Compagnie Generale CMA CGM Maritime CMDU CNC Line Cheng Lie Navigation Co.,Ltd 11DX COSCO COSCO Container Lines COSU Crowley Crowley CMCU/CAMN CSAV Compania Sud Americana de Vapores CHIW CSAV Norasia CSAV Norasia NSLU CSCL China Shipping Container Lines Co CHNJ Delmas Delmas DAAE Dole Dole Ocean Cargo Express DOLQ Ecuadorian Line Ecuadorian Line EQLI Eimskip Eimskip EIMU/EIMW Emirates Emirates Shipping Line ESPU Eukor Eukor EUKO Evergreen Evergreen Line EGLV FESCO Far Eastern Shipping Company FESO GAL Galborg GFAL Grieg Star Grieg Star Shipping ACSU Grimaldi Grimaldi GRIU GSL Gold Star Line Ltd. GSLU GWF Great White Fleet UBCU GES Great Eastern Shipping Inc. GESC HAMBURG SUD Hamburg Sud SUDU Hanjin Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd. HJSC Hapag Lloyd Hapag Lloyd Container Line/A> HLCU HMM Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd. HDMU Hoegh Hoegh Autoliners HUAU Horizon Horizon Lines HRZU Hyde Shipping Hyde Shipping HYDU ICL Independent Container Line IILU IMC Industrial Maritime Carriers (Intermarine) IDMC Interocean Lines Interocean Lines INOC K Line Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. KKLU King Ocean King Ocean Sercies KOSL KMTC Korea Marine Transport Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Transpacific Services in Oakland
    Transpacific Services in Oakland THE Alliance Hapag-Lloyd, K-Line, MOL, NYK, Yang Ming Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 APL JPX CMA-CGM FUJI Hapag–Lloyd K Line Kobe–Nagoya–Tokyo–Sendai–San Pedro Bay– PS1 OICT MOL Oakland–Tokyo–Nagoya–Kobe–Sendai NYK 2 COSCO Shipping PSW3 K Line MOL Kobe–Nagoya–Shimizu–Tokyo–San Pedro Bay– PS2 TRAPAC NYK Oakland–Tokyo–Kobe–Nagoya–Shimizu Yang Ming 3 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Singapore–Laem Chabang–Cai Mep–Hong Kong– MOL PS3 TRAPAC San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Tokyo–Hong Kong– NYK Singapore–Laem Chabang–Cai Mep Yang Ming 4 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Hong Kong–Yantian–Kaohsiung–Keelung– MOL PS4 OICT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Keelung–Kaohsiung– NYK Da Chan Bay/Shenzen–Hong Kong–Yantian Yang Ming 5 Hapag–Lloyd K Line MOL PS5 OICT Shanghai–Ningbo–San Pedro Bay–Oakland NYK Yang Ming 6 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Qingdao–Ningbo–Shanghai–Busan–San Pedro Bay– MOL PS6 TRAPAC NYK Oakland–Busan–Qingdao–Ningbo–Shanghai Yang Ming 7 K Line Dalian–Xingang–Qingdao–Busan–San Pedro Bay– MOL PS8 TRAPAC Oakland–Busan–Kwangyang–Dalian–Xingang– NYK Yang Ming Qingdao 8 Hapag–Lloyd K Line Tokyo–Kobe–Ningbo–Shanghai–Busan– MOL EC1 WB TRAPAC NYK San Pedro Bay–Oakland Yang Ming 2M Maersk, MSC Ocean Carrier Service Name Terminal Rotation 1 Maersk TP8 Xingang–Qingdao–Ningbo–Busan–Yokohama– OICT MSC ORIENT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vostochny–Xingang 2 Maersk TP2 Tanjung Pelepas–Cai Mep–Yantian–Shanghai– MSC JAGUAR OICT San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vostochny–Busan– Shanghai–Ningbo–Chiwan–Singapore Bolded Carrier(s) operates the majority of vessel within the service route.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Working Paper No
    UCL CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SPATIAL ANALYSIS WORKING PAPERS SERIES Paper 173 - Nov 11 Cooperation in container shipping: A small world network of agreements ISSN 1467-1298 Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis University College London 1 - 19 Torrington Place Gower St London WC1E 7HB Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 1782 [email protected] www.casa.ucl.ac.uk Cooperation in container shipping: A small world network of agreements Simone CASCHILI1 2, Francesca Romana MEDDA2, Francesco PAROLA3, Claudio FERRARI4 1Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London 2UCL QASER Lab, University College London, Faculty of Engineering 3Business Administration Department, University of Naples “Parthenope” 4Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods, University of Genoa Abstract: The recent economic downturn has increased the need for cooperation among carriers in the container shipping industry. We introduce in this work a network analysis to investigate the topology and hierarchical structure of inter-carrier relationships. Our dataset is comprised of 65 carriers that provide 604 container services. Main findings indicate that the Cooperative Container Network (CCN) belongs to the family of small world networks. We demonstrate that when we increase the value of the connectivity among carriers, the handled capacity increases linearly, whereas the clustering coefficient decreases linearly. We then show how the economic success of a container carrier is often based on cooperation but also on its strategic dominant positioning within the container market. Keywords: container shipping lines; cooperative agreements; small world networks; complex network analysis. Simone Caschili and Francesca Romana Medda acknowledge1 the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under the grant ENFOLD-ing - Explaining, Modelling, and Forecasting Global Dynamics, reference EP/H02185X/1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Carrier Services
    Ocean Carrier Services - Port of Oakland Transpacific Services THE Alliance Hapag-Lloyd, ONE, Yang Ming OCEAN CARRIER SERVICE NAME TERMINAL VESSEL SIZE ROTATION 1 ONE (5 vessels) FP1 Hapag-Lloyd CMA CGM(ⱡ) FUJI 4,888 - Singapore(ⱡ)–Kobe–Nagoya–Tokyo–San Pedro Bay– APL(ⱡ) JPX TRAPAC 4,992 Oakland–Tokyo–Shimizu(ⱡ)–Kobe–Nagoya– OOCL(ⱡ) JPX Evergreen(ⱡ) PS1 2 ONE Singapore–Laem Chabang–Vung Tau/Cai Mep–Hong Hapag–Lloyd Kong–Yantian–San Pedro Bay– Yang Ming FP2 TRAPAC TBA Oakland–Yokohama–Hong Kong–Laem Chabang–Vung Tau/Cai Mep– 3 Yang Ming ONE 8,070 - Hong Kong–Yantian–Kaohsiung–Keelung– PS4 TRAPAC Hapag-Lloyd 8,620 San Pedro Bay–Oakland–Keelung–Kaohsiung– 4 ONE Hapag-Lloyd 3,700 - Qingdao–Shanghai–Ningbo–San Pedro PS6 OICT Yang Ming 8,210 Bay–Oakland–Tokyo– 5 ONE Xiamen–Hong Kong–Yantian–San Pedro Hapag-Lloyd PS7 TRAPAC 10,000 Bay–Oakland–Kobe– Yang Ming 6 ONE Shanghai–Kwangyang–Pusan–San Pedro Hapag-Lloyd PS8 TRAPAC TBA Bay–Oakland–Pusan–Kwangyang–Incheon Yang Ming 2M Maersk, MSC OCEAN CARRIER SERVICE NAME TERMINAL VESSEL SIZE ROTATION 1 Maersk TP8 Tianjin/Xingang–Qingdao–Shanghai–Busan– MSC(ⱡ) ORIENT 11,000 - OICT Yokohama–Prince Rupert–San Pedro 11,300 Hyundai(ⱡ) PS4 Bay–Oakland–Vostochniy(ⱡ) Hamburg Sud(ⱡ) UPAS 1 2 Maersk TP2 MSC (ⱡ) JAGUAR Singapore–Cai Mep–Yantian–Ningbo–Shanghai–San Hyundai (ⱡ) PS3 11,075 - OICT Pedro Bay–Oakland–Vostochniy(ⱡ)–Busan– Hamburg Sud (ⱡ) 13,800 Shanghai–Ningbo–Chiwan/Shekou–Singapore. UPAS 2 Bolded Carrier(s) operates all or the majority of vessels within the service (Italicized Carrier) denotes non-alliance
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 148/Wednesday, August
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Notices 43769 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a telecommunications equipment Title: United States/Australasia summary of the Commission’s manufacturers and service providers to Discussion Agreement. document, DA 06–1485, released July ensure that their products are accessible Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and 21, 2006. This designation or updated and usable to persons with disabilities, Safmarine Container Lines NV; ANL designation information may be sent to when readily achievable to do so. (See Singapore Pte Ltd.; Australia-New the Commission via e-mail to Implementation of sections 255 and Zealand Direct Line; CMA–CGM, S.A.; [email protected]. Contact 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of Compagnie Maritime Marfret S.A.; CP information for section 255 1934, as enacted by the Ships USA, LLC; Hamburg-Su¨ d; Hapag- telecommunications equipment Telecommunications Act of 1996, Lloyd AG; and Wallenius Wilhelmsen manufacturers is posted on the Report and Order and Further Notice of Logistics AS. Consumer & Governmental Affairs Inquiry (RO and FNOI), WT Docket No. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Bureau’s Web site at: http:// 96–198, FCC 99–181, 16 FCC Rcd 6417 Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/ (September 29, 1999), published at 65 NW; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036. section255_manu.html; contact FR 63235, November 19, 1999). The Synopsis: The amendment reflects information for telecommunications regulations require, in part, that Hapag-Lloyd’s new corporate name. service providers is posted at: http:// equipment manufacturers and service Agreement No.: 011223–034.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/22/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-14814, and on FDsys.gov FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)- 523-5793 or [email protected]. Agreement No.: 011426-061. Title: West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement. Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; Hamburg-Süd; Hapg-Lloyd AG; Mediterranean Shipping Company, SA; and Seaboard Marine Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O’Conner; 1200 Nineteenth Street NW; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment would add King Ocean Services Limited, Inc. as a party to the agreement. Agreement No.: 011574-019. Title: Pacific Islands Discussion Agreement. Parties: Hamburg Sud KG doing business under its own name and the name Fesco Australia/New Zealand Liner Services (FANZL); and Polynesia Line Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O’Conner; 1200 Nineteenth Street NW; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment deletes CMA-CGM SA and Compagnie Maritime Marfret SA as parties to the agreement. Agreement No.: 012243-001. Title: MOL/Glovis Space Charter Agreement. Parties: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and Hyundai Glovis Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/23/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-28241, and on FDsys.gov FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)- 523-5793 or [email protected]. Agreement No.: 011117-057. Title: United States/Australasia Discussion Agreement. Parties: ANL Singapore Pte Ltd.; CMA-CGM.; Hamburg-Süd; Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.; and Pacific International Lines (PTE) LTD. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O’Connor; 1200 Nineteenth Street, NW; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment would add Compagnie Maritime Marfret S.A. as a party to the Agreement. Agreement No.: 011574-020. Title: Pacific Islands Discussion Agreement. Parties: Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft KG doing business under its own name and the name Fesco Australia/New Zealand Liner Services (FANZL); and Polynesia Line Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O’Conner; 1200 Nineteenth Street NW; Washington, DC 20036. Synopsis: The amendment would add Compagnie Maritime Marfret S.A. as a party to the Agreement. Agreement No.: 011223-054. Title: Transpacific Stabilization Agreement. Parties: American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co. PTE Ltd.; (operating as a single carrier); Maersk Line A/S; CMA CGM, S.A.; COSCO Container Lines Company Ltd; Evergreen Line Joint Service Agreement; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Mediterranean Shipping Company; Orient Overseas Container Line Limited; Yangming Marine Transport Corp.; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Note 17 Ver 16
    16th of August 2018 (Concept note #17) Making a fragmented and inefficient container industry more profitable through PortCDM by Mikael Lind, 1, 2 Michele Sancricca, 3 Andy Lane, 4 Michael Bergmann, 1 Robert Ward, 1 Richard T. Watson,1, 5 Niels Bjorn-Andersen,1 Sandra Haraldson, 1 Trond Andersen, 6 Phil Ballou 7 1RISE Viktoria, Sweden, 2Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, 3Mediterranean Shipping Company, USA, 4CTI Consultancy, Singapore, 5University of Georgia, USA, 6Port of Stavanger, Norway, 7Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, USA Introduction Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda are renowned for their relentless focus on cost reduction through first class optimization of their supply chains. In August 2018, they are reporting improving profits while US automakers are issuing profit warnings. 1 Toyota and Honda have successfully connected operational databases from the supporting business eco-systems in such a way that databases can be analysed intensively (AI, Business Analytics, etc.) to identify cost saving opportunities utilizing the Japanese kaizen philosophy for continuous improvement. They have learned that data-driven enterprises are more successful. In contrast, the self-organizing and fragmented nature of the maritime industry has traditionally deprived all actors of the data needed to achieve high levels of efficiency. Fragmentation is toxic to efficiency, but now we have an antidote - digital data sharing. The maritime segment of the container industry is very mature, but it is low-profit, fragmented and too many operations are not optimally synchronized. However, the adoption of the principles of Port Collaborative Decision Making (PortCDM) as an enabler of the Sea Traffic Management (STM) concept for shipping companies (within or outside alliances), ports, and terminals could substantially reduce the overall costs.
    [Show full text]