DOCSLIB.ORG

Bioastronautics Roadmap a Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Space Exploration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bioastronautics Roadmap a Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Space Exploration NASA/SP–2004–6113 Bioastronautics Roadmap A Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Space Exploration February 2005 THE NASA STI PROGRAM OFFICE . IN PROFILE Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION: Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical conferences, NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA or cosponsored by NASA. maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION: Scientific, technical, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by or historical information from NASA programs, Langley Research Center, the lead center for projects, and mission, often concerned with NASA’s scientific and technical information. The subjects having substantial public interest. NASA STI Program Office provides access to the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION: English- aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The language translations of foreign scientific and Program Office is also NASA’s institutional technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results are Specialized services that complement the STI published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating which includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results . even • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION: Reports of providing videos. completed research or a major significant phase of research, that presents the results of NASA For more information about the NASA STI Program programs and include extensive data or Office, see the following: theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant scientific and technical data and • Access the NASA STI Program Home Page at information deemed to be of continuing http://www.sti.nasa.gov reference value. NASA’s counterpart of peer- reviewed formal professional papers but has less • E-mail your question via the Internet to stringent limitations on manuscript length and [email protected] extent of graphic presentations. • Fax your question to the NASA Access Help • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: Scientific and Desk at (301) 621-0134 technical findings that are preliminary or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release reports, • Telephone the NASA Access Help Desk at (301) working papers, and bibliographies that contain 621-0390 minimal annotation. It does not contain extensive analysis. • Write to: NASA Access Help Desk • CONTRACTOR REPORT: Scientific and NASA Center for AeroSpace Information technical findings by NASA-sponsored 7121 Standard contractors and grantees. Hanover, MD 21076-1320 NASA/SP–2004–6113 Bioastronautics Roadmap A Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Space Exploration Previously published under JSC 62577 February 2005 Available from: This is a living document that undergoes periodic revision. Subsequent revisions are available at http://bioastroroadmap.nasa.gov/ NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7121 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161 This report is also available in electronic form at http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS DOCUMENT NUMBER: DATE: February 2, 2005 NASA/SP–2004–6113 Bioastronautics Roadmap A Risk Reduction Strategy for Human Space Exploration NASA/SP–2004–6113 i DOCUMENT NUMBER DOCUMENT CHANGE/ PAGE 1 OF 1 NASA/SP–2004–6113 REVISION LOG CHANGE/ DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE PAGES REVISION AFFECTED BASIC 02/02/05 Baselined Version ALL Altered pages must be typed and distributed for insertion. NASA/SP–2004–6113 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................7 2.0 ROADMAP HISTORY ................................................................................................................................7 2.1 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT.......................................................................................................8 2.2 BIOASTRONAUTICS CRITICAL PATH ROADMAP BASELINE DOCUMENT .......................................................8 2.3 BIOASTRONAUTICS STRATEGY ....................................................................................................................9 2.4 BIOASTRONAUTICS SCIENCE MANAGEMENT TEAM.....................................................................................9 3.0 ROADMAP CONTROL AND CONFIGURATION .................................................................................9 4.0 ROADMAP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................................10 5.0 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE ROADMAP .................................................................................................11 5.1 SETTING REFERENCE MISSION REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................................12 5.2 RISK IDENTIFICATION................................................................................................................................12 5.2.1 Risk Data Sheets ..................................................................................................................................14 5.3 IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY QUESTIONS ................................................................14 5.4 DEFINING DELIVERABLES .........................................................................................................................15 5.5 ASSESSING READINESS LEVELS.................................................................................................................17 6.0 ROADMAP RISKS AND RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY QUESTIONS ....................................18 7.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND RATING RESULTS....................................................................................24 7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT AND RATING................................................................................................................24 7.2 RISK RATING RESULTS..............................................................................................................................25 8.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT.........................................................................................30 8.1 ROADMAP INTEGRATION AND INTERACTION .............................................................................................30 8.2 USING A PROJECT APPROACH....................................................................................................................31 9.0 FORWARD WORK....................................................................................................................................31 9.1 BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS..........................................................................................................................31 9.2 METRICS ...................................................................................................................................................32 10.0 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................32 APPENDICES A. RISK DATA SHEETS ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 B. SPACE FLIGHT FACTOR INTERACTIONS ...................................................................................................... B-1 C. EXPLORATION SYSTEMS MISSION DIRECTORATE SCHEDULES AND MILESTONES ............................. C-1 D. ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................................... D-1 E. GLOSSARY........................................................................................................................................................ E-1 F. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. F-1 NASA/SP–2004–6113 iii INDEX OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables Page TABLE 5-1: ROADMAP REFERENCE MISSIONS (AS OF JULY 2003) ................................................................................12 TABLE 5-2: ROADMAP CROSSCUTTING AREAS AND DISCIPLINE TEAMS.......................................................................13 TABLE 5-3: RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY QUESTION CATEGORIES ................................................................................14 TABLE 5-4: AREAS TO WHICH ROADMAP DELIVERABLES CONTRIBUTE .......................................................................15 TABLE 5-5: COUNTERMEASURE/TECHNICAL READINESS LEVELS ................................................................................17 TABLE 6-1: RISKS AND R&TQ FOR EACH DISCIPLINE AND CROSSCUTTING AREA .......................................................18 TABLE 6-2: CROSSCUTTING AREA: HUMAN HEALTH AND COUNTERMEASURES ..........................................................19 TABLE 6-3: CROSSCUTTING AREA: AUTONOMOUS MEDICAL CARE .............................................................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-8 Satellites and “Weightlessness” Objects in Orbit Are Said to Experience Weightlessness
    5-8 Satellites and “Weightlessness” Objects in orbit are said to experience weightlessness. They do have a gravitational force acting on them, though! The satellite and all its contents are in free fall, so there is no normal force. This is what leads to the experience of weightlessness. 5-8 Satellites and “Weightlessness” More properly, this effect is called apparent weightlessness, because the gravitational force still exists. It can be experienced on Earth as well, but only briefly: Calculating the Local Force of Gravity So the local gravitational acceleration depends upon your distance from the center of mass. Usually this is your distance from the center of the Earth ConcepTest 5.9 Fly Me Away You weigh yourself on a scale inside an airplane that is flying with constant 1) greater than speed at an altitude of 20,000 feet. 2) less than How does your measured weight in the 3) same airplane compare with your weight as measured on the surface of the Earth? ConcepTest 5.9 Fly Me Away You weigh yourself on a scale inside an airplane that is flying with constant 1) greater than speed at an altitude of 20,000 feet. 2) less than How does your measured weight in the 3) same airplane compare with your weight as measured on the surface of the Earth? At a high altitude, you are farther away from the center of Earth. Therefore, the gravitational force in the airplane will be less than the force that you would experience on the surface of the Earth. ConcepTest 5.10 Two Satellites Two satellites A and B of the same mass 1) 1/8 are going around Earth in concentric 2) 1/4 orbits.
    [Show full text]
  • Asen 5016 Space Life Sciences
    January 15, 2019 ASEN 5016 SPACE LIFE SCIENCES Spring 2019 Tues/Thurs 2:0-3:15 pm ECCS 1B28 Instructor: Dr. David Klaus telephone: (303) 492-3525 email: [email protected] This course is intended to familiarize engineering students with factors affecting living organisms (ranging from single cells to humans) in the reduced-gravity and increased radiation environment of space flight, including orbital, lunar and Martian surface conditions. Unique insight will be gained regarding engineering design requirements for spacecraft habitats, life support systems and spacesuits, as well as space biology payloads. Life support needs, as they relate to basic human survival requirements, are covered initially. Next, the lectures turn to more detailed descriptions of the physiological adaptations that occur to people in space, with pertinent background information presented for each topic. Corresponding biomedical countermeasures used to maintain crew health for long duration missions will also be discussed. Finally, the underlying biophysical mechanisms affected by gravity, along with experiment design criteria, will be addressed. Current events within NASA’s research and exploration mission programs and the emerging commercial human space flight sector are reflected throughout the lecture topics. To further elaborate on the lecture material discussed in class, a series of integrated homework tasks provides a practical introduction to the process of journal article publishing and research proposal writing, including the anonymous peer review process used for each. The assignment involves writing a short journal article on an approved topic of your choice, your participation as a peer reviewer for the editor, revising your draft per the review comments you receive back, and resubmitting a final manuscript with a corresponding summary of changes made.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael R. Barratt (M.D.) NASA Astronaut
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 August 2020 Michael R. Barratt (M.D.) NASA Astronaut Summary: Dr. Michael R. Barratt was selected by NASA in 2000. Board certified in Internal and Aerospace Medicine, he has participated in two spaceflights. In 2009, Dr. Barratt served as Flight Engineer for Expedition 19/20. This marked the transition from three to six permanent International Space Station crew members. During this time, he performed two spacewalks. He also flew on STS-133, which delivered the Permanent Multipurpose Module and fourth Express Logistics Carrier. Currently, Dr. Barratt serves in the Mission Support branches providing medical and human factors expertise to multiple spaceflight programs. Personal Data: Born on April 16, 1959 in Vancouver, Washington. Considers Camas, Washington, to be his home town. Married to the former Michelle Lynne Sasynuik. They have five children. His mother, Donna Barratt, resides in Camas, Washington. Personal and recreational interests include sailing, boat restoration and nautical history, carpentry, writing, cooking good food in austere places, family and church activities. Education: Graduated from Camas High School, Camas, WA, 1977. Bachelor of Science in Zoology, University of Washington, 1981. Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) from Northwestern University, 1985. Completed a three-year residency in Internal Medicine at Northwestern University in 1988. Completed Chief Residency year at Veterans Administration Lakeside Hospital in Chicago in 1989. Completed residency and Master’s program in Aerospace Medicine at Wright State University in 1991. Board certified in Internal and Aerospace Medicine. NASA Experience: Dr. Barratt came to NASA JSC in May 1991 employed as a project physician with KRUG Life Sciences, working on medical systems for Space Station Freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • International Space Medicine Summit 2018
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE MEDICINE SUMMIT 2018 October 25–28, 2018 • Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy • Houston, Texas INTERNATIONAL SPACE MEDICINE SUMMIT 2018 October 25–28, 2018 • Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy • Houston, Texas About the Event As we continue human space exploration, much more research is needed to prevent and/or mitigate the medical, psychological and biomedical challenges spacefarers face. The International Space Station provides an excellent laboratory in which to conduct such research. It is essential that the station be used to its fullest potential via cooperative studies and the sharing of equipment and instruments between the international partners. The application of the lessons learned from long-duration human spaceflight and analog research environments will not only lead to advances in technology and greater knowledge to protect future space travelers, but will also enhance life on Earth. The 12th annual International Space Medicine Summit on Oct. 25-28, 2018, brings together the leading physicians, space biomedical scientists, engineers, astronauts, cosmonauts and educators from the world’s spacefaring nations for high-level discussions to identify necessary space medicine research goals as well as ways to further enhance international cooperation and collaborative research. All ISS partners are represented at the summit. The summit is co-sponsored by the Baker Institute Space Policy Program, Texas A&M University College of Engineering and Baylor College of Medicine. Organizers Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy The mission of Rice University’s Baker Institute is to help bridge the gap between the theory and practice of public policy by drawing together experts from academia, government, media, business and nongovernmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 2: Bodies in Orbit
    Episode 2: Bodies in Orbit This transcript is based on the second episode of Moonstruck, a podcast about humans in space, produced by Dra!House Media and featuring analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Aerospace Security Project. Listen to the full episode on iTunes, Spotify, or on our website. BY Thomas González Roberts // PUBLISHED April 4, 2018 AS A DOCENT at the Smithsonian National Air & Space But before humans could use the bathroom in space, a Museum I get a lot of questions from visitors about the lot of questions needed to be answered. Understanding grittiest details of spaceflight. While part of me wants to how human bodies respond to the environment of outer believe that everyone is looking for a thoughtful Kennedy space took years of research. It was a dark, controversial quote to drive home an analysis of the complicated period in the history of spaceflight. This is Moonstruck, a relationship between nationalism and space travel, some podcast about humans in space. I’m Thomas González people are less interested in my stories and more Roberts. interested in other, equally scholarly topics: In the late 1940s, American scientists began to focus on Kids: I have a question. What if you need to go to the two important challenges of spaceflight: solar radiation bathroom while you're in a spacesuit? Is there a special and weightlessness.1 diaper? Aren't you like still wearing the diaper when you are wearing a spacesuit? Let'sThomas start González with radiation. Roberts is the host and executive producer of Moonstruck, and a space policy Alright, alright, I get it.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Study Papers Download
    33 rd Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society Conference œ Vancouver œ June 15-18 2010 Topic Area - Physiological systems and models. Plantar Biophotonic Stimulation improves Ocular-motor and Postural Control in Motor Vehicle Accident Patients. Amanmeet Garg a, Michelle Bruner a, Philippe A. Souvestre b, Andrew P. Blaber a a) Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada. b) NeuroKinetics Health Services B.C. Inc., Suite 60 Hycroft Centre, 3195 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Introduction: Worldwide road accident related statistics reflect a consistent increase of motor vehicle accidents (MVA). Survivors of motor vehicle accidents experience a range of head injuries from whiplash, concussion, and mild to severe traumatic brain injuries, of which the most severe may result in incapacitation or death. Central sensory-motor controls (SMC), including ocular-visual, ocular-motor, vestibular, and cerebellar systems are primarily affected. Methods: Visual-ocular convergence (VOC) and postural balance (PB) tests are used among others to measure the degree of central sensory-motor controls dysfunction. This retrospective study (n=19) investigates the effect of passive biophotonic stimulation applied to plantar postural sensory afferents on VOC and PB tests conducted during a neurophysiological evaluation. Stabilogram diffusion analysis (SDA) of the centre of pressure trajectory from the PB test was used to determine the amount of stochastic activity and dynamic behavior of postural control (Collins and De Luca, Exp Brain Res 95:308-318, 1993). Results: Visual-ocular convergence was significantly closer (p<0.001) with stimulation (5.3±1.0 cm) than without (11±1.0 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Thought Experiments in Teaching Free-Fall Weightlessness: a Critical Review and an Exploration of Mercury’S Behavior in “Falling Elevator”
    OPEN ACCESS EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education ISSN: 1305-8223 (online) 1305-8215 (print) 2017 13(5):1283-1311 DOI 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00671a Thought Experiments in Teaching Free-Fall Weightlessness: A Critical Review and an Exploration of Mercury’s Behavior in “Falling Elevator” Jasmina Balukovic Druga Gimnazija, Sarajevo, BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA Josip Slisko Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, MEXICO Adrián Corona Cruz Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, MEXICO Received 9 May2016 ▪ Revised 7 June 2016 ▪ Accepted 7 June 2016 ABSTRACT Different “thought experiments” dominate teaching approaches to weightlessness, reducing students’ opportunities for active physics learning, which should include observations, descriptions, explanations and predictions of real phenomena. Besides the controversy related to conceptual definitions of weight and weightlessness, we report another controversy regarding the position of the person that weighs herself or himself in a freely-falling elevator, a “thought experiment” commonly used for introducing the concept of weightlessness. Two XIX-century “thought experiments”, one from America and one from Russia, show that they have a long tradition in physics teaching. We explored experimentally a “thought experiment” that deals with the behavior of a mercury drop in a freely-falling elevator. Our experimental results show that the mercury drop neither took the expected spherical shape nor performed oscillatory motions predicted by theory. Teachers should encourage
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Newsletter
    National Space Biomedical Research Institute Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nulla lectus mi, sodales ac, consectetuer sed, luctus sit amet, risus. Mauris tempusSociety quam sit amet mi. Mauris of sagittis Fellows augue nec augue. Fusce ipsum. Quarterly Newsletter Information for First Award Fellows Winter 2015 Cool Research Corner Measuring Intracranial Pressure aboard the Weightless Wonder VI Justin Lawley, Ph.D. 2013 NSBRI First Award Fellow In August of 2014, NSBRI investigators took to the sky in order to help identify the reason for visual impairments in astronauts. The current working hypothesis is that microgravity causes pressure inside the brain to increase, which causes deformation of the optic globe and thus changes in vision. To answer this question, Dr. Benjamin Levine of the Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine at UTSouthwestern Medical Center and his First Award Fellow, Dr. Justin Lawley, performed experiments onboard NASA’s C-9 aircraft (Weightless Wonder VI). Continued on Page 4 Thoughts from the Top: Interview with Dr. Jeffrey Sutton ……………… 2 2014 Summer Bioastronautics Institute Recap …………………………… 5 In This Issue: Fellow Spotlights: Allison Anderson and Julia Raykin ………………….. 7 Space Fun: Orion EFT-1 Quiz ……………………………………………. 10 Thoughts from the Top Interview of Dr. Jeffrey Sutton by 2013 NSBRI First Award Fellow Torin Clark, Ph.D. QN: Students and postdocs always wonder what the CEO does. Describe your “average day” at work. Dr. Sutton: The CEO is responsible for leading the development and execution of NSBRI’s strategy, in accord with our NASA cooperative agreement and to the benefit of all stakeholders. As CEO, I have daily management decisions, oversee the implementation of our plans, and am authorized to move funds, including those from the lead consortium institution (Baylor College of Medicine) to >60 recipient institutions in support of our science, technology, career development, and outreach programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Adaptation and Safety in Space
    SICSA SPACE ARCHITECTURE SEMINAR LECTURE SERIES PART II : HUMAN ADAPTATION AND SAFETY IN SPACE www.sicsa.uh.edu LARRY BELL, SASAKAWA INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SPACE ARCHITECTURE (SICSA) GERALD D.HINES COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TX The Sasakawa International Center for SICSA routinely presents its publications, Space Architecture (SICSA), an research and design results and other organization attached to the University of information materials on its website Houston’s Gerald D. Hines College of (www.sicsa.uh.edu). This is done as a free Architecture, offers advanced courses service to other interested institutions and that address a broad range of space individuals throughout the world who share our systems research and design topics. In interests. 2003 SICSA and the college initiated Earth’s first MS-Space Architecture This report is offered in a PowerPoint format with degree program, an interdisciplinary 30 the dedicated intent to be useful for academic, credit hour curriculum that is open to corporate and professional organizations who participants from many fields. Some wish to present it in group forums. The document students attend part-time while holding is the second in a series of seminar lectures that professional employment positions at SICSA has prepared as information material for NASA, affiliated aerospace corporations its own academic applications. We hope that and other companies, while others these materials will also be valuable for others complete their coursework more rapidly who share our
    [Show full text]
  • Human Adaptation to Space
    Human Adaptation to Space From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Human physiological adaptation to the conditions of space is a challenge faced in the development of human spaceflight. The fundamental engineering problems of escaping Earth's gravity well and developing systems for in space propulsion have been examined for well over a century, and millions of man-hours of research have been spent on them. In recent years there has been an increase in research into the issue of how humans can actually stay in space and will actually survive and work in space for long periods of time. This question requires input from the whole gamut of physical and biological sciences and has now become the greatest challenge, other than funding, to human space exploration. A fundamental step in overcoming this challenge is trying to understand the effects and the impact long space travel has on the human body. Contents [hide] 1 Importance 2 Public perception 3 Effects on humans o 3.1 Unprotected effects 4 Protected effects o 4.1 Gravity receptors o 4.2 Fluids o 4.3 Weight bearing structures o 4.4 Effects of radiation o 4.5 Sense of taste o 4.6 Other physical effects 5 Psychological effects 6 Future prospects 7 See also 8 References 9 Sources Importance Space colonization efforts must take into account the effects of space on the body The sum of mankind's experience has resulted in the accumulation of 58 solar years in space and a much better understanding of how the human body adapts. However, in the future, industrialization of space and exploration of inner and outer planets will require humans to endure longer and longer periods in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Medicine Association 2011 Executive Committee Ballot
    Space Medicine Association 2011 Executive Committee Ballot Candidates President Elect (1 vote): 1. Kaz Shimada 2. Vernon McDonald Treasurer (1 vote): 1. Serena Aunon 2. Shannan Moynihan 3. Yael Barr Members at Large (2 votes): 1. Michelle Christgen 2. Steve Vanderark 3. Tara Castleberry 4. Frederick Bonato 5. Azhar Rafiq Please see the short biographies on the next pages To cast your vote, please reply to this email or send an email to: [email protected] with the names of your selected candidates. President Elect Position Kazuhito Shimada, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Shimada is currently the chief of medical operations at Japanese space agency (JAXA). He has supported Japanese spaceflight crewmembers for STS-72, 87, 95, 92, 114, 123, 124, 119, 127, 131, and for ISS-19/20/21 and 22/23(21S). He supervised hypobaric and hyperbaric chamber operations, as well as weightlessness simulation diving at Tsukuba Space Cener. He served as Japanese and FAA AME, and is a vice president of FAI Medicophysiological Commission. He logged 700 hours on gliders and airplanes as a private pilot. 2010 Chief, JAXA Medical Operations 2008 AsMA Fellow 1997 ABPM board certification in Aerospace Medicine 1996 State of Ohio physician license 1993-1996 RAM at Wright State Univ.; 1995 MSci. in Aerospace Medicine 1993-present Flight Surgeon, JAXA (ex. NASDA, Japanese space agency) 1983-1992 Otolaryngology residence at Univ. of Tsukuba and Saku Central Hospital, then ENT practice at Ibaraki Kenritsu Chuo Hospital 1987 Ph.D.; Univ. of Tsukuba (auditory evoked response) 1983 M.D.; Univ. of Tsukuba, Japan President Elect Position Dr.
    [Show full text]