Digital Map Guide to Leadville
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range -
Section Six: Interpretive Sites Top of the Rockies National Scenic & Historic Byway INTERPRETIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Copper Mountain to Leadville
Top Of The Rockies National Scenic & Historic Byway Section Six: Interpretive Sites 6-27 INTERPRETIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN INTERPRETIVE SITES Climax Mine Interpretive Site Introduction This section contains information on: • The current status of interpretive sites. • The relative value of interpretive sites with respect to interpreting the TOR topics. • The relative priority of implementing the recommendations outlined. (Note: Some highly valuable sites may be designated “Low Priority” because they are in good condition and there are few improvements to make.) • Site-specific topics and recommendations. In the detailed descriptions that follow, each site’s role in the Byway Interpretive Management Plan is reflected through the assignment of an interpretive quality value [(L)ow, (M)edium, (H) igh], an interpretive development priority [(L)ow, (M)edium, (H)igh], and a recommended designation (Gateway, Station, Stop, Site). Interpretive value assesses the importance, uniqueness and quality of a site’s interpretive resources. For example, the Hayden Ranch has high value as a site to interpret ranching while Camp Hale has high value as a site to interpret military history. Interpretive priority refers to the relative ranking of the site on the Byway’s to do list. High priority sites will generally be addressed ahead of low priority sites. Top Of The Rockies National Scenic and Historic Byway INTERPRETIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 6-1 Byway sites by interpretive priority HIGH MEDIUM LOW • USFS Office: Minturn • Climax Mine/Freemont Pass • Mayflower Gulch -
Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21 -
Draba Weberi Price & Rollins
Draba weberi Price & Rollins (Weber’s draba): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 31, 2006 Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Decker, K. (2006, July 31). Draba weberi Price & Rollins (Weber’s draba): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/drabaweberi.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the employees of Colorado Springs Utilities (Mike Herrin, Bruce Newell, and Kirsta Scherff-Norris) and Colorado Division of Water Resources (Mark Haynes) who responded quickly and openly to my inquiries about the upper Blue Lake Reservoir. USDA Forest Service personnel, including Steve Olson, Paul Semmer, Terry Edelmon, and Greg Laurie, were also extremely helpful in determining the status of Draba weberi and its environs. Dr. Michael Windham of the Utah Museum of Natural History provided helpful clarification of the status of the genus Draba. Bill Jennings provided photographs and records of his observations. Georgia Doyle and Ellen Mayo provided information from the most recent observations of D. weberi. Thanks also to David Anderson and Jill Handwerk of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program for assisting with the preparation of this assessment. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY Karin Decker is an ecologist with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). She works with CNHP’s Ecology and Botany teams, providing ecological, statistical, GIS, and computing expertise for a variety of projects. She has worked with CNHP since 2000. -
Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA
Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA Table of Contents Acronyms...................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Background.......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Prior Appropriation System .....................................................................1-2 1.4.2 Reclamation and Green Mountain Reservoir...........................................1-2 1.4.3 Western Area Power Administration.......................................................1-4 1.4.4 Springs Utilities’ Collection Systems and Customers .............................1-4 1.4.5 Blue River Decree....................................................................................1-7 1.4.6 Substitution Year Operations...................................................................1-8 1.4.7 Substitution Memorandums of Agreement............................................1-10 -
Ralph Nevy to His Wife Erminia
A letter from Ralph Nevy to his wife Erminia Colorado 1915 by Joan Lander July 26, 2016 Another priceless gem has recently surfaced in the Nevy family — a letter Nonno (Ralph Nevy) sent to Nonnie (Erminia Nevy) back in 1915 from Leadville, Colorado. Nonnie was staying in Denver at the time. They had just been married in Pennsylvania in January of that year. Family stories say they decided to leave the Nevy brothers’ store in Vintondale and strike out for new horizons. They both worked in Denver, but Nonno had gone on to Leadville seeking new job possibilities. Christine Albetta gave a copy of this letter to Janet Orsinger McIntyre, who gave it to Barbara Orsinger Adolfson’s daughter Kristin to share with all of the Nevy family. This letter was written over a hunded years ago! The envelope says “Leadville Colorado, the top of the world. Souvenir folder.” So it may have contained some postcards of the area. The stamp on the envelope says U.S. postage - 1 cent. There’s also a picture on the front of the envelope showing Mount Elbert. This is one of the mountain peaks that Carol Lander climbed a couple years ago. The letter has revealed some connections and opened new questions. Read on! The flap says: From: Ralph Nevy Leadville, Colo Here is the body of the letter from Ralph to Erminia. Sandra Nevy did the English translation. She wasn’t able to make out all the words that Nonno wrote, but here is her best guess. (Sandra says this could also be translated as “I have arrived in Leadville.”) Ralph’s letter is addressed to Mrs. -
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections. -
Colorado Byways Strategic Plan 2017
Strategic Plan for the Colorado Scenic and Historic Byways Commission It is with great pleasure and pride that the Colorado Scenic and Historic Byway Commissioners present our Strategic Plan to support the next three years of the program’s vision. The Colorado Scenic and Historic Byways program isn’t just a list of roads connecting one place to another. The 26 Byways have been carefully selected by the Commissioners to awe, instruct, delight, inform, physically challenge, soothe, and bolster the physical and spiritual health of the thousands of travelers who traverse Colorado’s chosen trails. There isn’t one formula that defines a Colorado Byway, but when you are driving, cycling, or walking on one of these routes you feel a “wow” factor that can’t be denied. Whether you are an outdoor recreationist, history buff, nature lover, tourist, or conservationist, you will recog- nize the work of devoted locals who share their bounty with you through resource stewardship. And that devotion is paid back to the local businesses, non-profits, and local citizens through renewed pride in their resources, community coalescence, and economic development. For the immediate future, the Commissioners want to chart innovative ways to support and guide Colorado’s Scenic and Historic Byways. Please join us in celebrating past accomplish- ments and envisioning new journeys. Colorado Scenic and Historic Byways Commission—January 2017 Silver Thread THE COLORADO SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAYS COMMISSION Rep. K.C. Becker, Chair: Representing the Robert John Mutaw: Rep. History Colorado Colorado General Assembly Jack Placchi: Rep. U.S. Bureau of Land Kelly Barbello: Rep. -
PIKE and SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 Acres)
PIKE AND SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 3 Aspen Ridge (14,200 acres) ............................................................................................................ 4 Babcock Hole (8,900 acres) ............................................................................................................ 5 Badger Creek (12,400 acres)........................................................................................................... 7 Boreas (10,200 acres)...................................................................................................................... 8 Buffalo Peaks East (5,700 acres) .................................................................................................... 9 Buffalo Peaks South (15,300 acres) .............................................................................................. 10 Buffalo Peaks West (8,300 acres) ................................................................................................. 12 Burning Bear (19,300 acres) ......................................................................................................... 13 Chicago Ridge (5,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 14 Chipeta (28,700 acres) .................................................................................................................. 15 Cuchara North -
EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED the COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I
EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED THE COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I. Last Name First Peak Month Year Last Peak Month Year 1. Carl Blaurock (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2. William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3. Albert Ellingwood 4. Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 Sep 1934 5. Carl Melzer 1937 6. Robert B. Melzer 1937 7. Elwyn Arps Eolus, Mt. 1920 Jul 1938 8. Joe Merhar Pyramid Peak Aug 1938 9. O. P. Settles Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1939 10. Harry Standley Elbert, Mt. 1923 Sep 1939 11. Whitney M. Borland Pikes Peak Jun 1941 12. Vera DeVries Longs Peak 1936 Kit Carson Peak Aug 1941 13. Robert M. Ormes Pikes Peak Capitol Peak Aug 1941 14. Jack Graham Sep 1941 15. John Ambler Sep 1943 16. Paul Gorham Pikes Peak 1926 Aug 1944 17. Ruth Gorham Grays Peak 1933 Aug 1944 18. Henry Buchtel Longs Peak 1946 19. Herb Hollister Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1947 20. Roy Murchison Longs Peak 1908 Aug 1947 21. Evelyn Runnette Longs Peak 1931 Uncompahgre Peak Sep 1947 22. Marian Rymer Longs Peak 1926 Crestones Sep 1948 23. Charles Rymer Longs Peak 1927 Crestones Sep 1948 24. Nancy E. Nones (Perkins) Quandary 1937 Eolus, Mt. Sep 1948 25. John Spradley Longs Peak 1943 Jul 1949 26. Eliot Moses Longs Peak 1921 Jul 1949 27. Elizabeth S. Cowles Lincoln, Mt. Sep 1932 Wetterhorn Peak Sep 1949 28. Dorothy Swartz Crestones Aug 1950 29. Robert Swartz Bross, Mt. 1941 Crestones Aug 1950 30. -
Ce Standards Outlined in FHWA’S Monitoring Plan and As Required by the USACE Section 404 Permit Conditions
Fremont Pass Rec Pathway Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity 2 Fremont Pass Rec Pathway Purpose and Need The purpose of the proposed project is to improve the safety of cyclists traveling along State Highway (SH) 91 in Tenmile Canyon. Currently, cyclists travelling south from Copper Mountain toward Fremont Pass must ride on SH 91 through Tenmile Canyon. This situation presents safety concerns for cyclists and drivers through this approximately 3.3-mile segment of highway as it has limited shoulder widths, tight curves, high speeds, and short line of sight distances. In addition, there is a need to provide additional multi-use pathways in Summit County, Colorado. Not only does Summit County aim to accomplish its objectives to maintain, enhance, connect, and expand the recreation pathway system, the Tenmile Canyon corridor south of Copper Mountain has been identified as a high priority pathway in Governor Hickenlooper’s “Colorado the Beautiful: Colorado’s 16” trails initiative. The recreation pathway system in Summit County continues to experience increased demand and utilization. The proposed project would complement the current recreation pathway in Summit County by offering an extension of this system with the proposed pathway towards Fremont Pass. In addition to benefiting cyclists, the multi-modal pathway will allow walkers, runners, and other non-motorized recreational users to access this section of Tenmile Canyon. Description of the Proposed Action Construction of the new recreation pathway would be on National Forest system lands managed by the USFS. The proposed pathway alignment would use the existing, abandoned railroad grade in Tenmile Canyon. This alignment is on the east side of both Tenmile Creek and SH 91. -
Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas
Southern Rockies Lynx Amendment Appendix D - Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas The goal of linkage areas is to ensure population viability through population connectivity. Linkage areas are areas of movement opportunities. They exist on the landscape and can be maintained or lost by management activities or developments. They are not “corridors” which imply only travel routes, they are broad areas of habitat where animals can find food, shelter and security. The LCAS defines Linkage areas as: “Habitat that provides landscape connectivity between blocks of habitat. Linkage areas occur both within and between geographic areas, where blocks of lynx habitat are separated by intervening areas of non-habitat such as basins, valleys, agricultural lands, or where lynx habitat naturally narrows between blocks. Connectivity provided by linkage areas can be degraded or severed by human infrastructure such as high-use highways, subdivisions or other developments. (LCAS Revised definition, Oct. 2001). Alpine tundra, open valleys, shrubland communities and dry southern and western exposures naturally fragment lynx habitat within the subalpine and montane forests of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Because of the southerly latitude, spruce-fir, lodgepole pine, and mixed aspen-conifer forests constituting lynx habitat are typically found in elevational bands along the flanks of mountain ranges, or on the summits of broad, high plateaus. In those circumstances where large landforms are more isolated, they still typically occur within 40 km (24 miles) of other suitable habitat (Ruggerio et al. 2000). This distribution maintains the potential for lynx movement from one patch to another through non-forest environments. Because of the fragmented nature of the landscape, there are inherently important natural topographic features and vegetation communities that link these fragmented forested landscapes of primary habitat together, providing for dispersal movements and interchange among individuals and subpopulations of lynx occupying these forested landscapes.