DOCSLIB.ORG

The Permian System in Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Permian System in Kansas Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin 257 The Permian System in Kansas by R. R. West1, K. B. Miller2, and W. L. Watney3 1Emeritus Professor, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 2Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 3Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 2010 West et al.—The Permian System in Kansas i COVER—The broad, fl at surface in the center of the photo is the top of the Glenrock Limestone Member of the Red Eagle Limestone and the Carboniferous–Permian boundary at Tuttle Creek Lake Spillway in Pottawatomie County, Kansas. The Kansas Geological Survey does not guarantee this docu- Editor: Marla D. Adkins–Heljeson ment to be free from errors or inaccuracies and disclaims any Graphics: Jennifer Sims responsibility or liability for interpretations based on data used Cover: P. Acker in the production of this document or decisions based thereon. ISBN: 978-1-58806-333-X ii Kansas Geological Survey—Bulletin 257 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Historical Aspects ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Permian Recognized in Kansas ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Original Description ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Past to Present ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Nineteenth Century................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Early Twentieth Century – (1900–1959) ............................................................................................................................... 3 Late Twentieth Century – (1960–1999) ................................................................................................................................ 3 Early Twenty-fi rst Century .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Rocks Currently Recognized as Permian in Age...................................................................................................................... 4 Lower Boundary of the Permian ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Upper Boundary of the Permian ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Distribution in Kansas ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 General Geologic Setting ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Major Subdivisions ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Wolfcampian ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Lithostratigraphic Units ................................................................................................................................................ 11 Council Grove Group ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Red Eagle Limestone ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Roca Shale ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Grenola Limestone ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Eskridge Shale ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Beattie Limestone .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Stearns Shale .......................................................................................................................................................... 20 Bader Limestone .................................................................................................................................................... 20 Easly Creek Shale .................................................................................................................................................. 20 Crouse Limestone .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Blue Rapids Shale .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Funston Limestone ................................................................................................................................................. 21 Speiser Shale .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Composite Sequences in the Council Grove Group ............................................................................................. 21 Chase Group ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Wreford Limestone ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Matfi eld Shale ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 Barneston Limestone ............................................................................................................................................. 26 Doyle Shale ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 Winfi eld Limestone ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Odell Shale ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Nolans Limestone .................................................................................................................................................. 33 Upper Boundary of the Wolfcampian ........................................................................................................................... 33 Lithofacies and Thickness of the Wolfcampian ............................................................................................................ 33 Depositional Environments and Source Areas of the Wolfcampian ............................................................................. 39 Leonardian ........................................................................................................................................................................ 43 Lithostratigraphic Units ................................................................................................................................................ 43 Sumner Group .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 Wellington Formation ............................................................................................................................................ 43 Ninnescah Shale ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 Stone Corral Formation ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baylor Geological Studies
    BAYLORGEOLOGICA L STUDIES PAUL N. DOLLIVER Creative thinking is more important than elaborate FRANK PH.D. PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY BAYLOR UNIVERSITY 1929-1934 Objectives of Geological Training at Baylor The training of a geologist in a university covers but a few years; his education continues throughout his active life. The purposes of train­ ing geologists at Baylor University are to provide a sound basis of understanding and to foster a truly geological point of view, both of which are essential for continued professional growth. The staff considers geology to be unique among sciences since it is primarily a field science. All geologic research in­ cluding that done in laboratories must be firmly supported by field observations. The student is encouraged to develop an inquiring ob­ jective attitude and to examine critically all geological concepts and principles. The development of a mature and professional attitude toward geology and geological research is a principal concern of the department. Frontis. Sunset over the Canadian River from near the abandoned settlement of Old Tascosa, Texas. The rampart-like cliffs on the horizon first inspired the name "Llano Estacado" (Palisaded Plain) among Coronado's men. THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PRESS WACO, TEXAS BAYLOR GEOLOGICAL STUDIES BULLETIN NO. 42 Cenozoic Evolution of the Canadian River Basin Paul N. DoUiver BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Department of Geology Waco, Texas Spring 1984 Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer Jenness, M.S., Editor environmental and medical geology O. T. Ph.D., Advisor, Cartographic Editor what have you Peter M. Allen, Ph.D. urban and environmental geology, hydrology Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsolved Geological Problems in Oklahoma in 1925
    136 THE UNIVERSlTY OF OKLAHOMA XXXII. UNSOLVED GEOLQGICAL PROBLEMS IN OKLAHOMA IN 1925 By eha•. N. Gould, Oklahoma Geological Survey Thirty years ago Mr. Joseph A. T~f of the. Unit.ed Statc~ Geological Survey began work'on the coal fields of Indian 'Uddea. 1. A.. The'lUaa Rock of tile HiP PIaiu. BaD. A.-oc. Pet. (ieoI.. .~oI. VII. J'23, p. 12·74. THE OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE 137 Territory., Twenty-~ive yea~s,ago the writer founded the D.epart­ ment of Geology at the University of Oklahoma. For more thaa half the in'tervening time there were relatively few working geolo­ gists in Oklahoma but during the last decade the numb'er has in­ creased. The exact number o~ 'geologists living in Oklahoma is un­ known' but. there are somewhere around 300 names registerett irom this state on t,he rolls of American Association of Petroleum Geologists, and this of course does not represent the entire' nunt- I,er of geologists in the state. ', It might appear to the casual observer that300 men, :fome O'! who~ have been wor'king for at least a decade, should hav" ~olved practically all the ge'ological probiems in the state: As early as 1905, when E. G. Woodruff and I were the 'onl)' working geologists in Oklahoma, in order to attempt to outlin!: the magnftude o~ the <£ubject I prepared a list of the probleQ\ll to be solved in 'Oklahoma geology. So far as I know this list was never pu'blished and I am not now able to find it.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO
    Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO by James Daniel Pike, B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee Tom M. Lehman Jeffery A. Lee Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2017 Copyright 2017, James D. Pike Texas Tech University, James Daniel Pike, August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my advisor Dr. Dustin Sweet, who was an excellent advisor during this research. Dr. Sweet was vital throughout the whole process, be it answering questions, giving feedback on figures, and imparting his extensive knowledge of the ancestral Rocky Mountains on me; for this I am extremely grateful. Dr. Sweet allowed me to conduct my own research without looking over my shoulder, but was always available when needed. When I needed a push, Dr. Sweet provided it. I would like to thank my committee memebers, Dr. Lee and Dr. Lehman for providing feedback and for their unique perspectives. I would like to thank Jenna Hessert, Trent Jackson, and Khaled Chowdhury for acting as my field assistants. Their help in taking measurements, collecting samples, recording GPS coordinates, and providing unique perspectives was invaluable. Thank you to Melanie Barnes for allowing me to use her lab, and putting up with the mess I made. This research was made possible by a grant provided by the Colorado Scientific Society, and a scholarship provided by East Texas Geological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa by ROBERT D
    Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa By ROBERT D. MILLER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 472 Prepared as a part of a program of the Department of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology .of the Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Iowa. 'iV ashington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 70 p. illus., maps (3 col.) diagrs., tables. 30 em. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 472) Part of illustrative matter fold. in pocket. Prepared as a part of a program of the Dept. of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin. Bibliography: p. 67-70. (Continued on next card) Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology of the 0maha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. 1964. (Card 2) 1. Geology-Nebraska-Omaha region. 2. Geology-Iowa-Council Bluffs region. I. Title: Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ 1 Stratigraphy--Continued Introduction ______________________________________ _ 2 Quaternary System-Continued Location ______________________________________ _ 2 Pleistocene Serie!Y-Continued Present investigation ___________________________ _ 2 Grand Island Formation ________________ _ 23 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 3 Sappa Formation __________
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Structure on the East Flank of the Ne:Aha Anticline in Northeast Pottawatomie County, Kansas
    SURFACE STRUCTURE ON THE EAST FLANK OF THE NE:AHA ANTICLINE IN NORTHEAST POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, KANSAS by GENE A. RATCLIFF B. S. Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 156 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology and Geography KANSAS STATE COLLEGE CF AGRICULTUhE AND APPLIED SCIENCE 1957 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Location of the Area 1 Geologic Setting 1 Statement of the Problem 4 nAPPING PROCEDURE 5 GEOLOGIC HISTORY 6 Paleozoic Era 6 :csozoic Era 7 Cenozoic Era 7 STRATIGRAPHY 11 Pennsylvanian System 11 Wabaunsee Group 11 Permian System 13 Admire Group 13 Council Grove Group 14 Chase Group 18 quaternary System 18 Pleistocene Series 18 STR7CTURE 19 Regional Structures 19 Nemaha Anticline 19 Forest City Basin 19 Local Structures 20 Humboldt Fault 20 Fault Description 21 iii Relationship to Regional Structures 21 Age of Faulting 24 CONCLUSION 25 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 29 LITERATURE CITED 30 APPLNDIX 31 INTRODUCTION Location of the Area The area covered by this investigation is located in the northeast corner of Pottawatomie county, Kansas. The Pottawa- tomie-Nemaha county line is the northern boundary and township seven south is the southern boundary. The area is approximate- ly two miles wide and 12 miles long in a southwest direction from the extreme northeast corner of Pottawatomie county. Geologic Setting The problem area lies within the Western Interior Province and is located on the east flank of the Nemaha Anticline. The two main structural features are the Nemaha Anticline and the Forest City Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Studies of Union County, New Mexico
    Bulletin 63 New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Geologic Studies of Union County, New Mexico by Brewster Baldwin and William R. Muehlberger SOCORRO 1959 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY KENNETH W. FORD, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director GEORGE S. Austin, Deputy Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, Secretary-Treasurer, 1961-1985, Hobbs Judy Floyd, President, 1977-1981, Las Cruces Owen Lopez, 1977-1983, Santa Fe Dave Rice, 1972-1983, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1985, Socorro BUREAU STAFF Full Time MARLA D. ADKINS, Assistant Editor LYNNE MCNEIL, Staff Secretary ORIN J. ANDERSON, Geologist NORMA J. MEEKS, Department Secretary RUBEN ARCHULETA, Technician I ARLEEN MONTOYA, Librarian/Typist WILLIAM E. ARNOLD, Scientific Illustrator SUE NESS, Receptionist ROBERT A. BIEBERMAN, Senior Petrol. Geologist ROBERT M. NORTH, Mineralogist LYNN A. BRANDVOLD, Chemist JOANNE C. OSBURN, Geologist CORALE BRIEBLEY, Chemical Microbiologist GLENN R. OSBURN, Volcanologist BRENDA R. BROADWELL, Assoc. Lab Geoscientist LINDA PADILLA, Staff Secretary FRANK CAMPBELL, Coal Geologist JOAN C. PENDLETON, Associate Editor RICHARD CHAMBERLIN, Economic Geologist JUDY PERALTA, Executive Secretary CHARLES E. CHAPIN, Senior Geologist BARBARA R. Popp, Lab. Biotechnologist JEANETTE CHAVEZ, Admin. Secretary I ROBERT QUICK, Driller's Helper/Driller RICHARD R. CHAVEZ, Assistant Head, Petroleum MARSHALL A. REITER, Senior Geophyicist RUBEN A. CRESPIN, Laboratory Technician II JACQUES R. RENAULT, Senior Geologist Lois M. DEVLIN, Director, Bus.-Pub. Office JAMES M. ROBERTSON, Mining Geologist KATHY C. EDEN, Editorial Technician GRETCHEN H.
    [Show full text]
  • Bivalvia, Late Jurassic) from South America
    Author's personal copy Pala¨ontol Z DOI 10.1007/s12542-016-0310-z RESEARCH PAPER Huncalotis, an enigmatic new pectinoid genus (Bivalvia, Late Jurassic) from South America 1 2 Susana E. Damborenea • He´ctor A. Leanza Received: 29 September 2015 / Accepted: 16 March 2016 Ó Pala¨ontologische Gesellschaft 2016 Abstract The extensive outcrops of the Late Jurassic– orientated at right angles to the shell margins. A few speci- Early Cretaceous Vaca Muerta Formation black shales and mens were found on the outside of large calcareous con- marls in the Neuque´n Basin have yielded very few bivalves, cretions within black shales; these are often articulated, and these are not well known. The material described here complete shells, which preserve the original convexity of the was collected in central Neuque´n, from late Tithonian cal- valves. In some cases these articulated shells seem to be careous levels within the black shales, between beds with associated with large ammonite shells, suggesting an epi- Substeueroceras sp. and with Argentiniceras noduliferum byssate (possibly also pseudoplanktonic) lifestyle. (Steuer). The material is referred to the new genus Huncalotis and to the new species H. millaini. The strongly Keywords Late Tithonian Á Neuque´n Basin Á Vaca inequivalve shells, the ligamental area with a triangular Muerta Formation Á Argentina Á Peru Á Bivalvia Á slightly prosocline resilifer, the right valve with ctenolium Pectinoidea Á Pectinidae and a very deep byssal notch, and the lack of radial orna- mentation make the shell of this new genus strikingly similar Kurzfassung Die reichlich zutage tretenden Schwarz- to the Triassic pectinid Pleuronectites.
    [Show full text]
  • Merciad Writer "Hangs Out" with Yamato Page 8 Hurst Soccer I
    THE STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF MERCYHURST COLLEGE SINCE 1929 ARTS& Hurst ENTERTAINMENT soccer I Merciad writer teams head "hangs out" with to playoffs Yamato page 8 page 12 Vol 75 No. 7 Mercyhurst College 501 E. 38th St. Erie, Pa. 16546 November 8; 2001 Anthrax threat turns out to be hoax By Annie DeMeo Staff writer The "Mercyworld" bubble was de- cidedly popped Tuesday. Oct. 30 when a Mercyhurst employee opened an envelope postmarked Cairo, Egypt containing a suspicious white pow- der. * The Federal Bureau of Investiga- tion notified the college at about 2 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 2 with test re- sults revealing that the powder was not anthrax. Despite the fact that the letter was a hoax, it was successful in upsetting the routine of the college. Thirty seven individuals that c a m e in closest contact with the letter were quarantined immediately. F ™ t* About 500 students, faculty, staff; and administrators that were believed to be at risk of exposure were in- structed to undergo testing and, in most cases, prescribed to take the an- Annie Sitter/Merciad photographer tibiotic Cipro as a preventative mea- Effects of the national crisis touched Mercyhurst College Tuesday October 31 after a letter, threatening that it contained anthrax, was sure. * received in the admissions office. The letter, postmarked Cairo* Egypt, was later determined to be a hoax, testing negative for anthrax. Classes in Old Main were cancelled for both Wednesday and Thursday, 'The staff acted very quickly as blocked off. ing they were wearing as well as any dents through both the Cohen Student further disrupting the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantitative Study of Benthic Faunal Patterns Within the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian
    PALAIOS, 2006, v. 21, p. 316–324 Research Report DOI: 10.2110/palo.2005.P05-82e A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF BENTHIC FAUNAL PATTERNS WITHIN THE PENNSYLVANIAN AND EARLY PERMIAN NICOLE BONUSO* AND DAVID J. BOTTJER Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 3651 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California, 90089-0740, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT primary literature. Mudge and Yochelson’s (1962) monograph describes the stratigraphy and paleontology of the Pennsylvanian–Permian Mid- Using abundance data, this study explores quantitative patterns from continent of Kansas using over 300 fossil collections. Yancey and Stevens marine benthos, including implications for paleogeography, deposi- (1981) studied the Early Permian of Nevada and Utah extensively, re- tional environment, stratigraphic position, taxonomic groups (bra- corded abundance data from 55 localities, and identified paleocommun- chiopod or mollusc), substrate preferences, and ecological niches. ities based on the faunal comparisons and relative abundances within each Twenty-nine brachiopod- and bivalve-dominated fossil assemblages sample collected. As a result, three groups of commonly occurring com- from the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian of North and South Amer- munities emerged: (1) nearshore, mollusc-dominated; (2) open-shelf, non- ica, Thailand, and Australia were analyzed from carbonate-platform molluscan; and (3) deeper water, offshore mollusc-dominated. More re- environments; specifically, Nevada, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, cently, Olszewski and Patzkowsky (2001) documented the reoccurrence New Mexico, Venezuela, Kanchanaburi (Thailand), and Queensland of Pennsylvanian–Permian Midcontinent brachiopod and bivalve associ- (Australia). Samples were categorized by paleogeographic location, de- ations through time (Olszewski and Patzkowsky, 2001). Using a combi- positional environment, and age to help differentiate factors control- nation of data from Mudge and Yochelson (1962) and their own data, ling the faunal patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROJECT for Pottawatomie COUNTY, KANSAS
    Report No. K-TRAN: KU-06-5 FINAL REPORT CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INVENTORY/ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, KANSAS Evan Franseen, Ph.D. Galen Worthington Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas March 2008 A CooperatiVE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROGRAM BETWEEN: KANSAS Department OF Transportation KANSAS State UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KU-06-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Construction Materials Inventory/Geographic Information March 2008 System Development Project for Pottawatomie County, 6 Performing Organization Code Kansas 7 Author(s) 8 Performing Organization Report No. Evan Franseen, Ph.D., Galen Worthington 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas 1930 Constant Avenue 11 Contract or Grant No. Lawrence, KS 66047 C1578 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Covered Kansas Department of Transportation Final Report Bureau of Materials and Research Fall 2005 - Fall 2007 700 SW Harrison Street 14 Sponsoring Agency Code Topeka, Kansas 66603-3745 RE-0414-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. 16 Abstract Construction Materials Inventories (CMI) created for the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) for 36 Kansas counties are from 23 to 42 years old and in need of updating. New data, GIS technologies, and computer display tools offer new capabilities for the development of interactive web-based CMIs that can be continuously updated. This project developed a pilot CMI interactive website for Pottawatomie County. The county has been experiencing population growth, no state CMI had ever been produced, and the relevant USGS Material Construction Bulletin 1060-C was printed in 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Elementary School Geology Packet
    Garden of the Gods Park Contact: Bowen Gillings City of Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Email: [email protected] P: (719) 219-0108 Program updates can be found at: https://gardenofgods.com/educational/edu- 1/school-field-trips Land Use Acknowledgement: We gratefully acknowledge the native peoples on whose ancestral homeland we gather, as well as the diverse and vibrant Native communities of Colorado today. Geology of the Park Program Welcome! We look forward to sharing the geological story of Garden of the Gods with your students. We align with current Colorado Academic Standards for K-5 Earth and Space Science. Goals: Students recognize the exceptional geological wonder of the Garden of the Gods. Students gain a broad understanding of the geological events that shaped the Pikes Peak region Students gain a broad understanding of and appreciation for the science of geology. Students identify the three rock types and the three geological processes. Students recognize the geological formations in the Park, their ages, and composition. 1 Teacher Reference Guide: Basic Geology of Garden of the Gods The Pike’s Peak region has been shaped by millions of years of mountain building and erosion. There have been three different mountain building events in the geological history of this area: 1. The Ancestral Rockies (320-310 million years ago). The erosion of these first Rocky Mountains formed the sedimentary Fountain Formation and the Lyons Sandstone layers. 2. The Laramide Orogeny (70-65 million years ago). This process uplifted the Front Range. The layers seen in the Garden were forced upright as the land broke along the Rampart Range Fault.
    [Show full text]