DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ISSUE of REBAPTISM at Issue Is How We Are to Understand the Purpose of Baptism As Well As the Mode of Baptism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ISSUE of REBAPTISM at Issue Is How We Are to Understand the Purpose of Baptism As Well As the Mode of Baptism THE ISSUE OF REBAPTISM At issue is how we are to understand the purpose of baptism as well as the mode of baptism. If baptism if for the purpose of receiving forgiveness from God for past sins, then one does not have salvation prior to baptism - because salvation cannot be granted us while we are still in our sinful state. If baptism is not for the purpose of receiving forgiveness for past sins, then it is not essential to salvation because our sinful state was changed prior to baptism. In this case, baptism is understood as a required rite, but one that only "testifies" to the forgiveness, acceptance, that God has already granted us. One key text in this discussion (but not the only one) is Acts 2:38. Below are several English translation renderings of this text. King James Version - "for the remission of sins. American Standard Version - "unto the remission of sins. New King James Version - "for the remission of sins." New International Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Revised Standard Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." New Revised Standard Version - "so that your sins may be forgiven." New American Standard Bible - " for the forgiveness of your sins." World English Bible - "for the forgiveness of sins." Bible in Basic English - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Contemporary English Version - "so that your sins will be forgiven." Good News Bible - "so that your sins will be forgiven." God's Word - "so that your sins will be forgiven." Young's Literal Translation - "to remission of sins." Modern King James Version - "to remission of sins." International Standard Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." English Standard Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Literal Translation of the Holy Bible - "to remission of sins." New English Translation - "for the forgiveness of your sins." New Living Translation - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Today's English Version - "so that your sins will be forgiven." The Douay-Rheims Bible - "for the remission of your sins." Hebrew Names Version - "for the forgiveness of sins." The Webster Bible - "for the remission of sins." Wesley's New Testament - "to the remission of sins." Third Millennium Bible - "for the remission of sins." The Darby Translation - "for the remission of sins." Page 1 of 4 J. B. Philips Translation - "so that you may have your sins forgiven." New American Bible - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Amplified Bible - "for the forgiveness of and release from your sins." Worldwide English Bible - "Your wrong ways will be forgiven you." Weymouth Bible - "with a view to the remission of your sins." Revised King James New Testament - "for the remission of sins." Modern Literal Version - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Common Version New Testament - "for the forgiveness of your sins." Interlinear Greek New Testament - "for remission of sins." Living Oracles - "in order to the remission of sins." Montgomery New Testament - "for the remission of your sins." The Emphasized Bible - "into the remission of your sins." Covenant Edition New Testament - "to cancel your sins." Christian Standard Bible - "for the forgiveness of your sins." According to these translations, the evidence seems to point to baptism as the point at which sins are forgiven - thus salvation granted. This would help our understanding of two additional texts. First, Mark 16:15-16 shows a connection between belief, baptism, and salvation. Second, Matthew 26:28, which uses the same construction ("for the remission of sins") seems best understood as Jesus sacrificing His life in order to secure, bring into effect the remission of sins. It would seem logical to understand two texts of scripture with the same construction to be understood in the same way. In addition to these thoughts concerning the purpose of baptism, we should consider the examples of people who were being saved as recorded in the book of Acts. What is interesting is that despite some differences in the cases, each involves baptism - as shown in the following matrix. Page 2 of 4 Examples of Conversion BELIEVED REPENTED CONFESSED BAPTIZED PENTECOST Repented Acts 2:14-41 Acts 2:37-38 Acts 2:38-41 SAMARIA Acts 8:5-13 Acts 8:12 Acts 8:12-13 ETHIOPIAN Acts 8:35-36 Acts 8:36-37 Acts 8:37 Acts 8:38 SAUL Acts 9, 22, 26 Acts 22:16 CORNELIUS Acts 10:34-38 Acts 10:43 Acts 10:48 LYDIA Acts 16:16 Acts 16:15 Acts 16:13-15 JAILOR Acts 16:31 Acts 16:33 Acts 16:30-34 One question that is impacted by this information is the question of "rebaptism". Why would someone ever need consider being rebaptized - especially if this person experienced proper mode (burial in water - Rom. 6:1-4)? The question has been poured over by many sincere and scholarly persons over the history of the church. I humbly offer this reasoning for rebaptism. This action is needed in cases where the scriptural mode of baptism (an immersion in water) has not been followed or the scriptural reason for baptism has not been understood. In the latter case, I do not think that a person needs to fully understand all that is involved in baptism. However, there must be a basic understanding of this command as is provided in the teaching of Jesus and His apostles. What is this basic instruction that is to be understood? Based upon Mark 16:15-16 and Acts 2:37-47, one must understand that baptism is for the purpose of being pardoned of all sin and thus saved. Page 3 of 4 The troubling part of this reasoning is clear. Perhaps first is the question of why a person who was immersed - yet thinking that his/her sins were already pardoned - needs to now be re-immersed. This is a fair and reasonable question. It would seem as if the act itself, even without the proper understanding of the act, would suffice. However, there is scriptural precedent to the contrary. Acts 19:1-5 tells of a scene where some believers had been immersed, but their immersion was done without their understanding the proper purpose of it. These individuals were taught to be re- immersed - now that they had a proper understanding of the act. While the circumstances of this case are not identical to those of our time who were immersed with the understanding that they had already been forgiven prior to immersion, there is still precedent that proper understanding of the reason for the act is required to acceptably submit to the command. Page 4 of 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oracles Scripture in Old Testament
    Oracles Scripture In Old Testament Dissociated Edwin sometimes uncap any terrorisers jangling autographically. If wrathless or uncovered Alic usually sensitizes his Maratha syllabised dissimilarly or departmentalized plaguily and unfilially, how clear is Siddhartha? Rushed and epigene Dabney still dissembles his pegh veritably. Points of reference New Testament disciples of Christ need some know take that ago can rightly divide handle accurately the efficient of. Few writings of the OT are so consistently and persistently rooted in the eschaton as five That classic eschatological formula in that day arms the. You need to scriptures speak words we are founded on, as his instruction in scripture. Christians saw were female oracles as divine Deseret News. ORACLE in the KJV Bible 21 Instances Page 1 of 1 Expand such Limit your Search Results All KJV books Old number only a Testament only Apocrypha. The short form JahYah which appears in Exodus 152 and 1716 Psalm 99 Song of Songs 6 is preserved also in theophoric names such as Elijah my errand is Jah Malchijah my marry is Jah and Adonijah my waffle is Jah etc as fertile as grasp the phrase Hallelujah. The name Malachi appears nowhere else spend the Hebrew Bible The only perk of. Romans 31-2 The Oracles of ballot by Carl Westerlund. Have been framed to scriptures mentioned but fruit. Oracles--A good translation the Scriptures of the correct Testament as containing a revelation of. It be developed different senses, brought you will pierce him speak to recall the problem of that there were intended to the testament scripture in old testament and.
    [Show full text]
  • CHOOSING a BIBLE TRANSLATION Reading, Studying and Praying
    CHOOSING A BIBLE TRANSLATION Reading, studying and praying through the Bible are an essential part of the Christian faith. The Bible teaches us about who God is; the purpose of human life; and how we should live in relation to God, to other people and to the created world. But more than just a source of information, beliefs, and practices, when we read the Bible with faith it becomes one of the key places where we encounter God. Indeed, when we pray for God’s Spirit to bring the ancient words alive, we are promised an encounter with God’s living Word – Jesus himself. All of this makes choosing which Bible translation to use an important decision. The two main things that go into this decision is how faithful it is to the original Hebrew and Greek Biblical manuscripts (so it will communicate what the Bible really says), and whether it’s easy to understand and enjoyable to read (so that you’ll actually want to read it). Picking a good translation means balancing the two – some translations focus on being as literal as possible (word-for-word), while others focus on taking the ideas spoken in the ancient languages and putting them into easily understandable modern English (thought-for-thought). Below I’ve listed four translations which are among the most common ones used today. NRSV (New Revised Standard Version) The NRSV is a mainly word- for-word translation of the Bible that is the most commonly used translation in university level Biblical studies. One of its distinctive features are the fact that it was translated by a group of scholars that included Protestant, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christians, which makes it largely free of bias towards any one Christian tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing a Bible TRANSLATION
    Even the kjv translators realized this. In a couple of places in the Old Testament, the Hebrew text literally reads, “God’s nostrils enlarged.” But, the kjv translates this as, “God became angry”—which is what the expression means. In Matthew 1:18 the kjv says that Mary was found to be with child. But the Greek is quite different and quite graphic: “Mary was having it in the belly!” In many places in Paul’s letters, the kjv reads, “God forbid!” But the original Choosing a Bible has neither “God” nor “forbid.” Literally, it says, “May it never be!” (as most modern translations render it). Therefore, when we speak of a translation being TRANSLATION faithful to the original, we need to clarify the question: Is it faithfulness to form? Or, faithfulness to meaning? Sometimes faithfulness to one involves lack of fidelity to the other. There are problems with each of the translation philosophies. The kjv, with its attempted fidelity to form, does not make sense in some passages. (In 1611, these instances did not make sense either). Likewise, The nasb often contains wooden, stilted English. On the other hand, functional equivalence trans- lations sometimes go too far in their interpretation of a particular phrase. The niv, in eph 6:6, tells slaves to “Obey (their masters) not only to win their favor.” However, the word “only” is not in the Greek, and I suspect that Paul did not mean to imply it either. This DANIEL B. WALLACE reveals one of the problems with dynamic equivalence translations: the translators don’t always know whether their interpretation is correct.
    [Show full text]
  • What About Young's 'Literal' Translation?
    What about Young's 'literal' translation? Young’s “literal” (Hah!) translation I recently had another conversation at one of the Christian Forums about whether or not there exists such a thing as a complete, inspired and 100% true Bible in any language, and I ran into another guy who was trying to push Young’s ‘literal’ translation as being better than the King James Bible. So, I addressed the points he raised and then finally decided to write something more about this bogus bible version so that everyone can see it for what it is - just another shabbily dressed impostor. Here is our initial conversation, followed by some more examples of just how pathetic this so called ‘literal” translation really is. Will (that’s me) said: "Young's has some very serious problems. Do you have eternal life or just "age during life"? Is God from everlasting to everlasting, or just "age during"? The man recommending Young’s then responds: [quote]” I believe that many people make the mistake of equating eternal to everlasting and the phrase age-during. Eternal is uncreated and not bound by time. Everlasting, Forever, or Age-During is a created state, but may go on without end. A Hebrew age is a reference to a thousand year lifespan such as Adam and Methuselah experienced. If you accept the holy-day prophecy of 6 thousand years of work and 1 thousand year reign of God, age-during makes sense in a dispensational way. The understanding of the Hebrew 'owlam' is persistent endurance which can render as everlasting, forever, or the during part of -age-during.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Lost in Translations'
    St Peter’s College 2020 – Bill Goodman ‘Lost in Translations’ Which Bible Shall We Read? How Do Bible Translators Work? Today we have numerous different Bible translations in English. The translators tend to use two different approaches: - Literal – try to translate the exact words and phrases of the original language. A ‘word-for-word’ approach; also known as ‘Formal Equivalence’. - Dynamic – try to translate the thoughts and ideas of the original text. Update words, idioms and grammar by finding equivalents in the receptor language. An ‘idea-for-idea’ approach; also known as ‘Functional Equivalence’. For examples of the difference, compare different translations of Mark 15:33 (in NT times, what we call ‘noon’ was ‘the sixth hour’) or Phil. 1:8 (literally ‘bowels’, understood to be where compassion arises). Most translations use both approaches, but prefer one more strongly than the other. The box below gives a rough guide to which way each of the most commonly available versions leans. Which Translation is Which Type? In very broad terms, we can think of a spectrum between these two approaches: Formal Equivalence Functional Equivalence (‘word-for-word’) (‘idea-for-idea’) KJV&NKJV RSV&NRSV NIV&TNIV NIrV GNB CEV NLT LB NASBu ESV ISV JPS REB NEB CEB rNJB NJB JB NCV Message BfE NETbib Abbreviations (‘--------’ indicates a family connection, usually a revision) BfE = Bible for Everyone (Goldingay & Wright) CEB = Common English Bible CEV = Contemporary English Version GNB = Good News Bible (originally called Today’s English Version) ISV =
    [Show full text]
  • "New Bible Translations," Scripture 4 No. 4
    102 SCRIPTURE difficulties of publication will not long delay the greatly desired works. Back numbers of SCRIPTURE. Complete sets are still a comprehensive price of 15 s. 6d. (1946 to date). Single copies each. Please apply to the Treasurer, 43 Palace Street, London It is now possible to subscribe to SCRIPTURE (6s. 6d. per: without becoming a member of the C.B.A. This facility use especially to overseas subscribers. BOOKS AND PERIODICALS RECEIVED . We acknowledge with thanks the following: Cultllra Biblica, Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Collationes Brugenses, Pax, Verbum Domini, Reunion. From Burns Oates and Washbourne: Knox translation The Gospel according to St. Matthew, The Gospel St. Mark, The Gospel according to St. Luke, The Gospel according Separately in paper covers. The Old Testament, Vo!. n. Palanque &c., The Church in the Christian Roman Empire, Vol. I. F. R. Hoare, The Gospel according to St. John. From the Catholic University of America: Heidt, Angelology of the Old Testament. From T. Nelson and Sons, Edinburgh: Harrison, The Bible in Britain. From Letouzey and Ane, Paris: Pirot-Clamer, La Sainte Bible, Tome IV (Par.-'-Job). NEW BIBLE TRANSLATIONS! HE June number of Theology contains an informing attiC: Dr. Hendry of Princeton Theological Seminary on t T translations of the Bible that are being prepared in Engla.' the United States. Each of the two versions is to be a new trans not a revision of any existing version; it will avoid all archaie and phrases (" the second person singular shall be employed q prayer "); it is to be based on what scholars consider to be th available texts, which for the Hebrew Old Testament means ...
    [Show full text]
  • Maybetoday.Org » Electronic Versions of the Bible in English.Xlsx
    The English Versions of Sacred Scripture Currently Available in Electronic Bible Study Software Editions Abbr. Name Date Accordance BibleWorks Logos OliveTree PC Study Bible PocketBible WORDsearch ESV2016 English Standard Version "Permanent Text Edition" 2016 $15 BP $10 $10 AMPU Amplified Bible, 2015 Update 2015 $15 $10 NLT15 New Living Translation 2nd ed. Rel. 4 2015 $15 MEV Modern English Version 2014 $24 $10 NLT13 New Living Translation 2nd ed. Rel. 3 2013 $40 $10 TLV Tree of Life Version 2013 $24 $20 LES Lexham English Septuagint 2012 $25 TV The Voice 2012 $40 CEB Common English Bible 2011 $15 BP $15 $10 $10 EOB Eastern/Greek Orthodox Bible ‐ NT (of PATr) 2011 BP BP $24 ESV2011 English Standard Version 2nd ed. 2011 Free BP $10 EXB Expanded Bible 2011 $30 ISV2 International Standard Version 2.0 2011 $10 $15 $18 NIV11 New International Version 2011 2011 $20 BP $10 Free $24 $10 $10 OEB Open English Bible 2011 NABRE New American Bible Revised Edition 2010 $15 BP $17 $20 $24 $15 CPDV Catholic Public Domain Version 2009 EXB‐NT Expanded Bible ‐ New Testament 2009 $19 $20 $10 GUV Grammar Uses Version 2009 HCSB‐SE Holman Christian Standard Bible 2nd ed. 2009 $15 BP $10 Free $15 Free NHEB New Heart English Bible 2009 C COM Comprehensive New Testament (Clontz) 2008 $50 LEB Lexham English Bible 2008 Free C MIT MacDonald Idiomatic Translation Bible 2008 BP SAAS Saint Anthanasius Academy Septuagint 2008 $40 VW Voice in the Wilderness 2008 NETS New English Translation of the Septuagint 2007 $30 BP $25 NLT07 New Living Translation 2nd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Got the Bible", ©1970 Gospel Services, Inc
    bA s d g j k l o I u y t rQ v w g E j r k How We Got t l y p the Bible u o Book 2 (Lessons 4-6) i i o u p y l t k r j eq g z d c s n a m Bible Study Center, Box 189, 6000 Cebu City z Tel# 414-6311 Cell: 0927-482-6921 a email: [email protected] c d v Z c v b n m l k j g e Original text and slides from "How We Got the Bible", ©1970 Gospel Services, Inc. Used by permission. Various edits and new audio recordings by the Bible Study Center 2006-2015. 2 Bible Study Center “How We Got the Bible” Welcome! We are excited that you have decided to continue your study with us in this course How We Got the Bible. Congratulations on completing book 1! We hope you enjoy book 2 as much as you enjoyed book 1. Your assignment is the same in this book as your previous book. Study through the material and answer the questions at the end of each lesson. Study each lesson carefully. At the back of the booklet you will find a supplementary material section which will have MAPS and a GLOSSARY of terms to help you in your studies. Once you have completed working your way through all of the material for the lesson you then proceed to answer the test questions found at the end of each lesson. Read each question carefully and consider all the possible answer choices, then record your answers on the Answer Sheet for each booklet that we will provide.
    [Show full text]
  • What Did God Say? a Critical Analysis of Dynamic Equivalence Theory Katelyn R
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Department of English, Literature, and Modern Linguistics Senior Research Projects Languages 4-26-2018 What Did God Say? A Critical Analysis of Dynamic Equivalence Theory Katelyn R. Fisher Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ linguistics_senior_projects Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative and Historical Linguistics Commons, Discourse and Text Linguistics Commons, Language Interpretation and Translation Commons, Semantics and Pragmatics Commons, and the Translation Studies Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Katelyn R., "What Did God Say? A Critical Analysis of Dynamic Equivalence Theory" (2018). Linguistics Senior Research Projects. 14. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/linguistics_senior_projects/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics Senior Research Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: WHAT DID GOD SAY? 1 What Did God Say? ​ ​ A Critical Analysis of Dynamic Equivalence Theory Katelyn R. Fisher Cedarville University WHAT DID GOD SAY? 2 Abstract This paper is a critical analysis of Eugene A. Nida’s theory of dynamic equivalence as it relates to Bible translation, largely through a comparative study of select passages from the biblical genres of poetry, proverbs, and Pauline epistles. In addition, a brief survey distributed to 72 students at Cedarville University provides both qualitative and quantitative data regarding which English Bible version they prefer and why. Identifying Nida’s contributions to translation studies and analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of his theory in practice serves to provide implications for believers who are seeking to discern which English version is the most accurate, natural, and clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Android Bible Apps Available Versions As of 2012.09.06
    Android Bible Apps Available Versions as of 2012.09.06 ANDBible 1.6.0 (install link) Note: Bibles available through Crosswire / Xiphos English Apostolic Bible (with Strong's) ASV BBE Douay-Rheims ESV Etheridge Peschito NT God's Word ISV JPS KJV LEB NT NET (limited) OEB Web YLT Greek Apostolic Bible (mostly unaccented Greek with Strongs) BYZ (unaccented Greek with Strongs) LXX (Rahlf's; with Strongs) SBLGNT (accented Greek does not display) Tisch (unaccented Greek) WHNU (unaccented Greek with Strongs) Hebrew Aleppo Open Scriptures Morphological Hebrew Bible (morph coming; with Strongs) Westminster Leningrad Codex Latin Vulgate Biblia.com (without signing in to a Logos account) This is not an actually an app. These are all online versions available in a web browser If you have a Logos account, all your resources will be available here as well. English ASV NASB (1995) AV NET (full notes) Douay-Rheims New Century ESV NIRV God's Word NIV (2011) Good News NKJV HCSB NLT KJV 1900 NRSV Lexham English Bible RSV Message Young's Greek Stephanus (1550) with morph ? Scrivener (1881) Scrivener (1894) with morph ? Westcott-Hort (1881) Tischendorf Elzevir TR (1624) with morph ? Byzantine (Robinson-Pierpont) SBL GNT and apparatus Hebrew -- Latin Clementine Vulgate CadreBible 4.7.5 (install link) English American Standard Version Free Amplified Bible US$6.49 Bible in Basic English Free Darby Free Douay-Rheims Free English Standard Version US$6.49 Holman Christian Standard Bible® US$6.49 Holman Christian Standard Bible® with Strong's Concordance US$16.99
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Chart with Grade Levels
    Bible Chart with Grade Levels Preface: I have been meaning to do a chart like this for some time; the problem being is, I don’t really know how to judge reading levels. However, I have thought about subdividing the translations for the exegetical study of each chapter of the Bible and adding in another category of easy-to-read translations. In order to do that, I needed to know which translations were easy-to-read. This resulted in the following chart, culled mostly from elsewhere, with the credit given at the bottom of the chart. Reading Level by Description/ Bible/ Published/ Grade/ Target Translation Commentary Distinctives Examples Abbreviation translators Audience Philosophy This translation is really a Dynamic 11th Grade mini-commentary which A popular translation used features a system of to understand the New Testament Amplified Bible Word-for-word Those looking for verse-end alternate hidden meaning of Greek 1958; Old plus additional more detailed translations and comments and Hebrew words. Break Testament 1964; AMP amplification of shades of meaning on different shades of through the language Revised 1987 word meanings in in Scripture meaning in the original barrier. brackets languages. Common English Bible 7th grade CBS, BY CEB This version seeks to be readable, yet faithful to the meaning of the original texts. Nouns describing God's actions (righteousness, Written at an 4th Grade Contemporary Paraphrase salvation, etc.) are rendered elementary-school 5.4 grade level New Testament English Version in varying ways. This version reading level, the CEV is 5th BY 1991; Old Thought-for- avoids complicated readable and Testament 1995 CEV thought language, obscure understandable for the Unchurched vocabulary and difficult modern reader.
    [Show full text]
  • "How to Buy a Bible"
    "How To Buy a Bible" "And some other related things" by John Karmelich ([email protected]) • Dozens of English Translations? • Commentaries? • "Devotional" Bibles? • Concordances? • "Study" Bibles? • Lexicons? • "Official" Bibles? • Study Guides? • "Red Letter" Bibles? • Audio Bibles? • "Giant Print" Bibles? • On-Line Bibles? • Literal vs. Paraphrase Bibles? • Bible Computer Software? "This book will keep you from sin & sin will keep you from this book" Swedish Proverb -------------------------------- "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. (2nd Timothy 3:16-17) -------------------------------- "Next to praying there is nothing so important in practical religion as Bible-reading. God has mercifully given us a book which is "able to make [us] wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus" (2nd Timothy 3:15). By reading that book we may learn what to believe, what to be, and what to do; how to live with comfort, and how to die in peace. Happy is that man who possesses a Bible! Happier still is he who reads it! Happiest of all is he who not only reads it, but obeys it, and makes it the rule of his faith and practice!" J. C. Ryle (1816-1900) Top Ten Bestselling Bibles in 2010 (Christian Booksellers Association) 1) New International Version (last revised 2011) 6) Reina Valera (Spanish) 1960 2) New Living Translation (last revised 2007) 7) Holman Christian Standard Bible (last revised 2004) 3)
    [Show full text]