DOCSLIB.ORG

I. Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I. Executive Summary I. Executive Summary I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Description of Proposed Action This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) has been prepared under provisions of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). It follows a DEIS Scope that was adopted by the Planning Board of the Village of Ossining, the designated lead agency for the SEQRA review. The Project Site is located in close proximity to the Hudson River near the northern end of the Village of Ossining, Westchester County, New York. The Site encompasses three tax parcels (tax lots designated as Section 3, Block 1, Lots 24, 24B and 42), totaling 8.2 acres and is located off of an extension of North Water Street. The Proposed Action calls for the rezoning of the PRD portion of the Project Site to WD-2 and the corresponding amendment to the Village Zoning Map. In addition, the WD-2 states that no one use shall exceed 70% of the total project. While the goal of encouraging mixed- use development is appropriate for the core downtown area, it is less desirable for the Project Site, which is not adjacent to the Village’s business district. Therefore, the Proposed Action also calls for a text amendment to the WD-2 zone providing the Planning Board with the authority to waive this requirement where it is determined that the overall objectives of the WD-2 zone would be better served by such modification or waiver. A set of guidelines is provided to assist the Planning Board in making its determination, including: the location of the site in relation to the Village’s downtown area; the relationship of the site to the Hudson River; the physical characteristics of the site, including its topography, vegetation, wetlands and other natural features; the character of surrounding land uses, especially to the extent that they are residential or include existing buildings that house multiple types of uses; the appropriateness of the site for accommodating a mix of uses due to the configuration and/or condition of an existing building on the site that is to be adaptively reused as part of a proposed project; and the nature and patterns of access to the site. Currently, the Project Site is located within two zoning districts. Two non-contiguous portions of the project site are zoned PRD Planned Residence District, comprising 4.725 acres. The remaining 3.45 acre central segment of the site is zoned WD-2 Waterfront Development District – East Side of the Railroad Tracks. This rezoning, which would allow for a uniform zone throughout the property, provides greater opportunity for a mix of housing types on the site. The Proposed Action includes the construction of 132 units (one of which is for the living quarters of an on-site superintendent) in four buildings, including: the renovated Brandreth Pill Factory building containing 24 units in three to four stories (50 feet), and an adjacent four story (44 feet) annex building with 40 units on the lower, northern portion of the site; a 56-unit, six-story (66 feet) plateau building; and 12, two and a half story (38 feet) townhouse units on the lower portion of the site, below the plateau, south of the Pill Factory. A conditional use permit, as granted by the Planning Board, is required for the proposed project to allow for the construction of multiple dwelling units with up to two-bedrooms per unit. An area variance, as granted by the Zoning Board, is required with respect to §270- Saccardi & Schiff, Inc. I-1 Executive Summary 46(B) of the Zoning Ordinance and §7-736 of the Village Law, addressing the Site’s street frontage. The Applicant must also obtain site plan approval from the Planning Board. B. Impact Analysis / Mitigation Measures The following table outlines the potential significant adverse impacts and the proposed mitigation measures: Table I-1 Impact/Mitigation Proposed Improvements/ Impact Category Impact Mitigation Measures Land Use and Zoning The Proposed Action calls for the rezoning of The proposed zoning expands the existing WD- the PRD portion of the site to WD-2, allowing 2 zoning on-site, to create a uniform zone for for a uniform zone throughout the property and the entire property. The proposed residential increased flexibility in the redevelopment of land use creates a transitional area between the Brandreth Pill Factory building. The existing residential uses to the north and east, maximum permitted net density is 18 units per and the light industrial uses to the west and acre, with no dwelling unit to contain more south. It is of the applicant’s opinion that there than two-bedrooms, and a maximum height of are no anticipated significant adverse impacts six stories. Upon, rezoning this requirement associated with the proposed residential uses on would be met. Following rezoning of the land use or zoning, and therefore, no mitigation plateau area from PRD to WD-2, the maximum is required. permitted height would increase from two and a half to six stories. While this portion of the The Applicant is seeking an area variance from Hidden Cove property would not be governed the Zoning Board with respect to §270-46(B) of by the Village’s Special Height Overlay the Zoning Ordinance and §7-736 of the district, the ridge of the proposed building Village Law. would be at elevation 127. This is substantially below the maximum 180 feet above sea level that is contained in the regulations for Height Zone B which covers the portions of the Hidden Cove property that are currently zoned WD-2. The WD-2 zone encourages mixed-use development. It is the view of the Applicant that mixed-use development is not appropriate for the unique location of the project site. As such, the Proposed Action includes amended language to the WD-2 zone, which would keep the intent of the zone for the other WD-2 areas, but would allow the Planning Board to waive this requirement where it is determined that the overall objectives of the WD-2 zone would be better served by such waiver. LWRP LWRP policies discussed/analyzed in Ch. III Mitigation measures that promote or advance are policies that are applicable to and/or relevant LWRP policies include: minimize the affected by the project. The proposed needed grading by taking advantage of development is generally consistent with the previously developed areas of the site and flat outlined policies of the LWRP. The proposed areas; implementation of an erosion control project does not promote or advance Policy 2- plan and stormwater management plan; Facilitate the siting of water dependent uses rehabilitation of the State and National Register and facilities on or adjacent to coastal waters. listed Brandreth Pill Factory; and redevelopment of a deteriorated and underutilized formerly industrial site for residential use. Saccardi & Schiff, Inc. I-2 Executive Summary Proposed Improvements/ Impact Category Impact Mitigation Measures Visual Resources It is the Applicant’s opinion that there are no It is of the applicant’s opinion that no anticipated significant adverse impacts on mitigation is necessary. visual resources. The proposed buildings are designed in terms of scale, shape, materials and colors to blend in with the surrounding environment. The shadow analyses show that the adjacent properties will not be significantly impacted by the shadows cast by the proposed buildings. Soils / Topography / Site disturbance will consist of grading of the Mitigation measures will include an erosion Steep Slopes land in preparation for the construction of control plan to stabilize disturbed areas. roads, buildings, and parking lots. Construction Roadway staging areas will be provided along of the building on the plateau will entail the roadway construction area. All pipes, catch removal of approximately 26.5 feet from the basins and other materials will be stored on top of the plateau to accommodate underground appropriate slopes with anchors to prevent parking for the building’s residents. movement during the construction period. On-site construction will likely involve blasting The Applicant will comply with the provisions around the area of the proposed plateau of Chapter 123 of the Village Code (Explosives building. There will be an estimated 64,454 cy and Blasting). of cut, of which, ±11,772 cy will be used as fill elsewhere on the site and ±52,682 cy of cut will be removed from the site. (See Appendix J for the Preliminary Blasting Plan Notes.) Flora and Fauna Development activities have been planned to To minimize loss of habitat, the removal of avoid impacts to the Federally regulated natural vegetation will be minimized as much watercourse that is the most sensitive area on as possible to preserve natural cover types on the property. No significant impact to this the site. Large contiguous forested areas will resource is anticipated. Forest construction remain and will continue to provide ecological activities including the placement of housing benefits. Other habitat aspects of the site will and appurtenant features will impact be preserved where they do not interfere with approximately 2.5 acres of mainly the oak-tulip the functioning of the development. tree forest portion of the site. These areas will Temporary wildlife displacement during be replaced with cultural cover types. Overall, construction is a short-term impact. Wildlife a decrease in natural wildlife habitat value is displaced during construction activities will anticipated although the species richness of the more than likely return after construction is local wildlife community should remain complete. It is of the applicant’s opinion that constant. The majority of the forest, especially no impact will occur, and therefore, no the more mature portion in the upper mitigation is proposed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Real Estate Record and Builders' Guide
    REAL ESTATE RECORD AND BUILDERS' GUIDE. VOL. XXV. NEW TORK, SATURDAY, MAY 1, 1880. No. Qf:: Published Weekly by sation all the various improvements that ought to troversy, maj, however, soon come up, when I will be done in the Park. It seems to have been for­ look into its various phases. As yet I have not TERMS. gotten that the most attractive features of the P.ark fully done so." ONE YEAR, in advance....SIO.OO. are, the lawns, the foliage, and drives, the flowers " NO 0CC.\.SI0N " FOR MEETINGS. and walks. Of "late years this does not appear_to Cnniraunications should be addressed to " Is it not singular that this question has not have been uppermost in the minds of the Commis­ been discussed at length at the meetings of your C. MV. SWEET, sioners, and too little attention has been paid to it. Board recently?" No. 137 BROADWAY When I practically ceased to have any control of "My dear sir, we have only two meetings a the Department in 1870 a variety of improve­ month now. When I say anything about this I am ANDREW H. GREEN AND THE PARKS. ments were proposed for the Park. The conserva­ told, ' there is no occasion for more meetings,' just IXTRUVIEW WITH THE NEW COMMISSIONEK — THE tory was cut off in 1874, the Belvidere plan has thinkof it, a department having charge of such NEGLECT IN THE CENTRAL PAllK, DECAY OF FOLI.iGE been, disfigured, a ridiculous sheep-fold has been vast interests only meeting twice a month. When .KSV STKUCTaRES—A'ANDALISM BY EX-COMMISSION- EIW—TIME RIPE FOR I3IPROVEMENT3 EVERYWHERE erected better fitted for a regiment of artillary I was Commissioner before, I gave up my entire —TIIE WORLD'S FAIR THE GREAT AGENCY FOR than for sheep, and since my return to the Board business, devoted my entire time to the important milLDING UP THE WEST SIDE—WHAT MUST BE DONE.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, March 4, 2019 7:30 PM
    VILLAGE OF OSSINING Planning Department John Paul Rodrigues Ossining Operations Center 101 Route 9A, Ossining, N.Y. 10562 Tel: (914)762-6232 www.villageofossiningorg HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, March 4, 2019 7:30 PM Members Present: Also Present: Chairperson Adam Markovics Tracey Corbitt, Director of Planning and Development Commission Member Catherine Wilson Manuel R. Quezada, Trustee Commission Member Dana White Stuart B. Kahan, Corporation Counsel Commission Member J. Phillip Faranda Absent: Commission Member Elizabeth Harlow Commission Member Gauri Gandbhir Commission Member Julia Quinn I. CONTINUING BUSINESS OF THE BOARD A. Local Landmarking Priorities The Commission discussed the possibility of pursuing the Sing Sing Warden's Residence as the next local landmarkingproject. Mr. Markovics mentioned that former HPC member Miguel Hernandez had prepared a lot of the background information for the application. Ms. Corbitt said some research may have to be done to A see if there were any restrictions as part of the sale of the property from New York State to its current owner. Mr. Kahan said that it would be beneficial to get the owner involved in the application process. Mr. Markovics suggested that Ms. Wilson explore the architectural aspects of the applicationto see if there is anything to add and asked Ms. White if she could research any further historical information that would enhance the application. Brandreth Pill Factory Office Building The Commission continued with the ongoing discussion regarding the Brandreth Office Building. The Commission has agreed that the best course of action is to cooperate with the developers of Hidden Cove to salvage as much as possible of the office building.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Ossining LWRP Described Below Be Incorporated As Routine Program Changes (Rpcs), Pursuant to Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Regulations at 15 C.F.R
    Village of Ossining Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Adopted: Village of Ossining Board of Trustees, July 2, 1991 Approved: NYS Secretary of State Gail S. Shaffer, July 11, 1991 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, June 8, 1993 Adopted Amendment: Village of Ossining Board of Trustees, March 16, 2011 Approved: NYS Secretary of State César A. Perales, October 25, 2011 Concurred: U.S. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management, February 1, 2012 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) has been prepared and approved in accordance with provisions of the Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing Regulations (19 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation of this Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State Coastal Management Program as a routine program change has been obtained in accordance with provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (p.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. [Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068.] The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department of State, Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Suite 1010, Albany, New York 12231-0001.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Medicine, Quack Cures, and Snake Oil: Why Do We Keep Falling for It?
    Patent medicine, quack cures, and snake oil: Why do we keep falling for it? Teaching American History March 2014 Cynthia W. Resor Do we still have a “patent medicine” problem? • Video • http://www.screencast.c om/t/VmN8qbM1cP • Captured parts of on- line videos (with sound) with Snag-it • http://www.techsmith.c om/snagit.html • 15 days free • $30 a year for teachers Why do we keep buying this stuff? • Many have the view the God or Nature has provided the remedies for the ailments of humans and even give clues to humans to find the right thing • Ignorance • Can’t tell the difference in proven medical practices and quackery • placebo effect • People believe it works; sometimes it has a therapeutic effect, causing the patient's condition to improve. • regression fallacy • Certain "self-limiting conditions", such as warts and the common cold, almost always improve • patient may associate the usage of alternative treatments with recovering, when recovery was inevitable 2. Why do we keep buying this stuff? • Distrust of conventional medicine • Many people, for various reasons including the risk of side effects, have a distrust of conventional medicines, the regulating organizations themselves such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or the major drug corporations • Conspiracy theories • Anti-quackery activists ("quackbusters") are accused of being part of a huge "conspiracy" to suppress "unconventional" and/or "natural" therapies, as well as those who promote them • believe the attacks on non-traditional medicine are backed and funded by the pharmaceutical industry and the established medical care system for the purpose of preserving their power and increasing their profits.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.5 Appraisal by Hudson Property Advisors
    PREPARED FALL 2012 HUDSON PROPERTY ADVISORS APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT PROPERTY OF PLATEAU ASSOCIATES “HIDDEN COVE ON THE HUDSON” LOCATED AT 36 WATER STREET VILLAGE OF OSSINING WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY JONATHAN BERNZ, MAI President SUBMITTED Hudson Property PLATEAU ASSOCIATES Advisors, LLC 427 BEDFORD ROAD PLEASANTVILLE, NY 10549 10 So. Moger Ave. VALUATION DATE Mt. Kisco, NY 10549 USA DECEMBER 6, 2012 File No. 2012.12001 HUDSON PROPERTY 10 South Moger Avenue ADVISORS, LLC Mt. Kisco, NY 10549 Jonathan A. Bernz, MAI Advanced Real Estate Appraisal and Consulting APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTY Summary Appraisal Report Property of Plateau Associates, LLC Hidden Cove on the Hudson 36 Water Street Village of Ossining Westchester County, New York (Our file # 2012.12001) Submitted Plateau Associates 427 Bedford Road Pleasantville, NY 10570 Date of Appraisal December 6, 2012 Date of Report December 10, 2012 Telephone (914) 244-3400 Fax (914) 244-3450 HUDSON 10 South Moger Avenue PROPERTY Mt. Kisco, NY 10549 Tel. (914) 244-3400 ADVISORS, LLC Fax (914) 244-3450 Jonathan A. Bernz, MAI Advanced Real Estate Appraisal and Consulting December 10, 2012 Plateau Associates 427 Bedford Road Pleasantville, NY 10570 Attention: Peter Stolatis Re: 36 Water Street (Hidden Cove on the Hudson) Village of Ossining Westchester County, NY (Our File No. 2012.12001) Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we inspected the captioned property, consisting of a 5.1415 acre parcel improved with a building known as the Brandreth Pill Factory, for the purpose of providing you with our estimate of market value of the fee simple interest under the following hypothetical conditions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ossining Downtown Redevelopment Working Committee Final Report
    OSSINING DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT WORKING COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT August 8, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction and Executive Summary II. Mission Statement III. Definition of Downtown IV. Summary of Upcoming Development in Downtown V. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: SWOT Analysis VI. Analysis of Comprehensive Plan and Existing Downtown Studies VII. Subject Area 1: Placemaking, Open Space, and The Built Environment VIII. Subject Area 2: Transportation and Parking ​ IX. Subject Area 3 Innovative Ideas ​ X. Subject Area 4: Outside Groups/Consulting ​ XI. Conclusion & Final Recommendations XII. Acknowledgments XIII. Appendices: A. Map of Downtown B. Empty Parcels C. Full SWOT Analysis D. Comprehensive Plan Spreadsheet E. Library of Links F. Additional Outside Groups Spreadsheet INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 2017, the Village of Ossining’s Mayor and Board of Trustees invited an energized group of community members to participate in a newly-formed Downtown Redevelopment Working Committee (DRWC). We are comprised of 20 community members from diverse backgrounds and age groups, including business owners, local not-for-profit leaders, commuters, and government officials. While the DRWC emerged from a vigorous village-wide debate over downtown traffic patterns, it evolved into an exciting process of reimagining, reigniting, and reinvigorating our Downtown. The DRWC was tasked with looking at our Downtown with a new lens. Our members imagined, without limits, what could be possible for our community. Our volunteers collectively spent hundreds of hours meeting as a large group, in subcommittees, and engaging in research individually. During our 90-day tenure, we shared visions for our Downtown, received a presentation from our Village Historian on the current state of development, engaged in an analysis of our Downtown’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (S.W.OT.), received a presentation on zoning from the Village Director of Planning and Development, and participated in a walking tour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Westchester Historian Index, 1990 – 2019
    Westchester Historian Index v. 66-95, 1990 – 2019 Authors ARIANO, Terry Beasts and ballyhoo: the menagerie men of Somers. Summer 2008, 84(3):100-111, illus. BANDON, Alexandra If these walls could talk. Spring 2001, 77(2):52-57, illus. BAROLINI, Helen Aaron Copland lived in Ossining, too. Spring 1999, 75(2):47-49, illus. American 19th-century feminists at Sing Sing. Winter, 2002, 78(1):4-14, illus. Garibaldi in Hastings. Fall 2005, 81(4):105-108, 110, 112-113, illus. BASS, Andy Martin Luther King, Jr.: Visits to Westchester, 1956-1967. Spring 2018, 94(2):36-69, illus. BARRETT, Paul M. Estates of the country place era in Tarrytown. Summer 2014, 90(3):72-93, illus. “Morning” shines again: a lost Westchester treasure is found. Winter 2014, 90(1):4-11, illus. BEDINI, Silvio A. Clock on a wheelbarrow: the advent of the county atlas. Fall 2000, 76(4):100-103, illus. BELL, Blake A. The Hindenburg thrilled Westchester County before its fiery crash. Spring 2005, 81(2):50, illus. John McGraw of Pelham Manor: baseball hall of famer. Spring 2010, 86(2):36-47, illus. Pelham and the Toonerville Trolley. Fall 2006, 82(4):96-111, illus. The Pelhamville train wreck of 1885: “One of the most novel in the records of railroad disasters.” Spring 2004, 80(2):36-47, illus. The sea serpent of the sound: Westchester’s own sea monster. Summer 2016, 92(3):82-93. Thomas Pell’s treaty oak. Summer 2002, 78(3):73-81, illus. The War of 1812 reaches Westchester County.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment H Explanatory Notes to Attachment H
    ATTACHMENT H EXPLANATORY NOTES TO ATTACHMENT H 1. This Attachment H consists of: (a) a Department of Environmental Conservation “Full Environmental Assessment Form” (“EAF”) for Verizon’s offering of cable service in Ossining, New York, with Part 1 filled in; (b) an EAF Addendum providing certain additional background information; and (c) exhibits to the Addendum, including maps showing environmentally relevant features of the franchise area and a list of sites included in the SPHINX database of historic sites, as described below. 2. The Attachment is submitted without prejudice to Verizon’s positions that: (a) the activities for which it seeks approval in this proceeding are not “actions” under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), and that therefore no EAF is required; and (b) if an EAF is required in this case, a short-form EAF will suffice. 3. The EAF and the EAF Addendum are based on information in Verizon’s possession or available to us through research in readily available sources. Beyond such sources, we have not undertaken any “new studies, research or investigation.”1 4. Historic site information was derived from the SPHINX database of the New York State Historic Preservation Office (see http://www.nysparks.state.ny.us/shpo/resources/ index.htm). Coastal area information was obtained from the New York State Geographic Information Systems Clearinghouse website (see http://www.nysgis.state.ny.us/gisdata/ inventories/details.cfm?DSID=317), as was flood plain data (see http://www.nysgis.state.ny.us/ gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=246). Information on wetlands locations was obtained from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Communities; Traffic Calming & Safety Policy Statements And
    Land Use Law Center Gaining Ground Information Database Topic: Healthy Communities; Traffic Calming & Safety Resource Type: Policy Statements and Planning Documents State: New York Jurisdiction Type: Municipal Municipality: Ossining Year (adopted, written, etc.): 2009 Community Type – applicable to: Urban; Suburban Title: Traffic Signals and Narrower Lanes to Improve Safety Document Last Updated in Database: March 18, 2019 Abstract Ossining, New York’s Comprehensive Plan includes traffic-calming measures to be implemented throughout the village, though particularly on Route 9. Route 9 is the primary north-south arterial reaching through Ossining and onto major highways in New York. Route 9’s increasingly congested condition has resulted in residential road use throughout the village. These residential roads are narrow, steep, and winding, and often dangerous during inclement weather. Ossining’s goal is to improve pedestrian safety and comfort, and to change the behavior of motorists who would otherwise use residential roads to bypass congestion on the major roads. One traffic-calming measure employed by the New York State Department of Transportation re-striping. Re-striping to a narrower lane slows traffic and increases the safety of the roads. What congestion might be created by this process is mitigated by the town’s restructured traffic signal timing and coordination which is based on traffic data collection. Restructured traffic signals are also meant to increase the safety of pedestrians crossing wide sections of Route 9 by increasing the time allotted. New traffic lights are to be implemented at strategic intersections where congestion and hazards typically occurs. Data collection is to be continued on the sections of the road that underwent re-striping and signal light restructuring in order to assess the effect of the measures.
    [Show full text]
  • J:N":Ou"St:Rial A.:Rch:Eology
    J:N":OU"ST:RIAL A.:RCH:EOLOGY Volume 9 Number 2 March 1980 LAST GASP OF LAST CHICAGO STATION? Always the country's premier railroad terminal city, Chicago extolled North Western as one of the most beautiful and efficient rapidly is coming close to losing its last station. Gradually, the city's urban terminals anywhere. Its architecture later lost critical favor onetime six passenger terminals have been demolished (IC's but its efficiency endured. Although the transcontinental and, Central, B&O's Grand Central), defiled (Union), or abandoned indeed, all intercity trains are gone, North Western was always (Dearborn). A fifth, LaSalle St., lives on borrow time, a shadow predominantly a suburban terminal - built to cope with hordes of of its former self. That leaves the Chicago & North Western's North people and multiple train movements in peak periods. Currently it Western Station (1908-11), a Neoclassic hulk located off the Loop serves a thriving commuter traffic of over 90,000 passengers a day, at W. Madison & N. Canal sts., still mostly in original condition. still far short of its designed capacity but more than double its 1915 load. Trains may have disappeared elsewhere, but rush hour at North Western is still a sight to behold. In fact, there is tentative talk of adding some Amtrak Milwaukee runs since Union Station (the city's other major station) is becoming overburdened. Happily, despite some 1965 interior alterations, North Western has survived in reasonably pristine original form, complete with its Bush trainshed and semaphore interlocking system. It is, in short, an almost perfectly preserved 1910-era metropolitan railroad terminal from its columned facade to its rear approach tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment
    G. Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND FIELD INVESTIGATION HIDDEN COVE DEVELOPMENT BRANDRETH PILL FACTORY VILLAGE OF OSSINING, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT and HELD INVESTIGATION HIDDEN COVE DEVELOPMENT BRANDRETH PILL EACTOR Y Village of Ossining, Westchester County, Ne\\-' York Prepared For: Peler StoJali~ 427 Bedford Road Pleasantville. NY 10570 Prepared Uy lli~lorical PerspcLlive~. Inc. P.O. I3(lX 3037 \liestport, CT 06880 Primary Author: Sara Mascia. Ph.D. Field DireclOr: James Cox September 201)6 Managemen! Summary SHPO Project Review Number (if available)c' _ Involved State and Federal Agencie~ (DEC, CORPS,FHWA.elc.): Phase ofSuT\iey:cPCh"",'~'_,~ _ Location lnfonnation Location: Water Street Minor CC;yC,","DC;",C;;C;oCoC'"TCoC.CnCoc,c'OnC"CiOoOinCgc-------------------­ County Westchesta Survey Area ~Metric & English) Length: _ Width: Depth (when appropriate): Numher ofAcres Survt"ved: <I Number of Square Meters & Feet E"xC'O'Cva=tC,Od"(~P~hc"'C'CIOI-,~P~hc",C,:-;;"~1Co=o~'y=)C,--------­ Percentage ofrhe Site Excavated (Phase II. Phase III only): U.5.G.S. 7.5 Minute Quadrangk Map: Ossining _ Archaeological Survey Oven'iew Number & Inter,a] of Shovel Tests: 15 at 15 meter interval or ~ma1Jer Number & Size ofunits,,'CC,,'o5_5cO""'"m'-'-v"S,OC'Cm"-­ _ Width of Plowed Strips: Surface Sur'iey of Transect rnterval: Results ofAn:haeological Survey Number & name of prehistoric sites identified: N:.0eo"''- _ Number & name of historic ~ites identitied: None Number & name of sites recommendcd for Phase "llc/AC--y-oC;dC,-,-,,-----------­ Results of Architectur<ll Survey Number ofbuildingsistructures/cemeteries within project area: I Number of buildings/structures/cemet~riesadjacent to project are",c.c3;---------­ NillIlher ofprrviously delem1ined NR listed or eligible buildings/structur.:slcemetcries/districis Number of identified eligible bui\dings/stTucrures/ccmeteries/districts: 3 Report Author ($): Sara F.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Statement Dated August 26, 2020
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED AUGUST 26, 2020 NEW AND RENEWAL ISSUE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES Statement Statement In the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings Official and court decisions, and assuming among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Notes is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Notes is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the Notes is exempt from personal income taxes imposed by the State of New York or any political subdivision thereof (including The City of New York). Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the Notes. See “Tax Matters” herein. shall this Preliminary this Preliminary shall The Notes will be “qualified tax-exempt obligations” pursuant to Section 265 (b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. VILLAGE OF OSSINING WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK $7,107,446 BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES, 2020 (the “Notes”) Date of Issue: September 24, 2020 Maturity Date: September 24, 2021 The Notes are general obligations of the Village of Ossining, Westchester County, New York (the “Village”), and will contain a pledge of the faith and credit of the Village for the payment of the principal thereof and interest thereon and, unless paid from other sources, the Notes are payable from ad valorem taxes which may be levied upon all the taxable real property within the Village, subject to applicable statutory limitations.
    [Show full text]