Download Crime and Consequence
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
October 12-18 Videofest.Org Video Association of Dallas Make Films That Matter
ANGELIKA FILM CENTER OCTOBER 12-18 VIDEOFEST.ORG VIDEO ASSOCIATION OF DALLAS MAKE FILMS THAT MATTER UNIVERSITY OF The Department of Art and TEXAS ARLINGTON Art History at UTA has an ART+ART HISTORY excellent reputation for FILM/VIDEO PROGRAM grooming young filmmakers, preparing WWW.UTA.EDU/ART 817-272-2891 them for the creative challenges and emotional rigors of the motion picture industry. Call our advising sta to find out how you can train to be a vital part of the film industry. Art Art History Department 2 CONTENTS 2 BROUGHT TO YOU BY 3 2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 4 SPONSORS & CONTRIBUTORS 8 WELCOME BY BART WEISS 10 ABOUT OUR JURORS 14 TEXAS SHOW JURORS 16 KOVACS AWARD 18 HONOREES 26 SCREENINGS 52 SCHEDULE 1 BROUGHT TO YOU BY BARTON WEISS YA’KE SMITH Artistic Director Festival Bumpers RAQUEL CHAPA MARK WICKERSHAM Managing Director KARL SCHAEFFER Transportation BOXOFFICE: PREKINDLE SELIG POLYSCOPE COMPANY CAMERON NELSON Videography Technical Supervisor REDMAN I AM CHRISTIAN VASQUEZ Trophies DAVID GRANDBERRY Technical Assistant MATTHIEU CARTAL DAKOTA FORD MARISSA ALANIS MATTHEW GEISE MARGARITA BIRNBAUM VIVIAN GRAY AMY MARTIN Outreach MIKE MILLER YUMA MORRIS KELLY J KITCHENS ELEONORA SOLDATI Interns RONI HUMMEL Media Relations/Entertainment Publicity BETH JASPER ALVIN HYSONG DANA TURNER MARSHALL PITMAN Program Editor WES SUTTON Programmers TAMITHA CURIEL Newsletter Editor RON SIMON Curator of Television Pasily Center CYNTHIA CHAPA Program Content ED BARK Critic Uncle Barkey SULLIVANPERKINS MICHAEL CAIN Graphic Design Filmmaker, former head of AFI Dallas Festival DESIGN TEXAS - UT ARLINGTON JOSH MILLS Program Book Design It’s Alive! Media & Management DEV SHAPIRO Kovacs Committee DARREN DITTRICH Webpage 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS JEFFREY A. -
Social & Legal Studies
Social & Legal Studies http://sls.sagepub.com/ 'Setting 'Em Up': Personal, Familial and Institutional Grooming in the Sexual Abuse of Children Anne-Marie Mcalinden Social & Legal Studies 2006 15: 339 DOI: 10.1177/0964663906066613 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Social & Legal Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sls.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sls.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339.refs.html >> Version of Record - Aug 29, 2006 What is This? Downloaded from sls.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ALABAMA on August 13, 2012 ‘SETTING ’EM UP’: PERSONAL, FAMILIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL GROOMING IN THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN ANNE-MARIE MCALINDEN Queen’s University Belfast, UK ABSTRACT The term ‘grooming’ has been used to describe the offender’s actions during the preparatory stage of sexual abuse. This article will argue that current discourses on grooming have created ambiguities and misunderstandings about child sexual abuse. In particular, the popular focus on ‘stranger danger’ belies the fact that the majority of children are abused by someone well known to them, where grooming can also occur. Current discourses also neglect other important facets of the sex offending pattern. They fail to consider that offenders may groom not only the child but also their family and even the local community who may act as the gatekeepers of access. -
Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science
Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Other responses Contents-Other responses Organisation Name Response Type ACPO Substantive Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Substantive Analytical Services International Ltd Response on behalf of Analytical Services International Ltd both as an academic researcher and a forensic service provider Association of Forensic Service Providers' Body Substantive Fluid Forum CCL Forensics Substantive Cellmark Forensic Services Substantive Crown Prosecution Service Substantive DSTL Substantive Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine Substantive Forensic Access Ltd. Substantive Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spetrometry Substantive (FIRMS) Network Forensic Science Northern Ireland Substantive Forensic Science Service 1 Substantive Forensic Science Service 2 Substantive Forensic Science Society Substantive Forensic Telecommunication Services Ltd Substantive Forensic Working Group for the Partnership Substantive against Wildlife Crime Freelance Scientists (but aligned to universities) Substantive Home Office Scientific Development Branch Substantive (name changed to Centre for Applied Science and Technology in April 2011) Intellect (trade association for the IT, telecoms Substantive and electronics industries) LGC Forensics Substantive LTG Executive Committee Substantive The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen Substantive National DNA Database Ethics Group Substantive National Physical Laboratory Substantive National Policing Improvement Agency Substantive Natural History Museum Substantive Prospect -
National Guidance on the Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records
National Guidance on the minimum standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records These GUIDANCE NOTES contain information to assist policing in England, Wales & Northern Ireland. It is OFFICIAL under the Government Security Classification Scheme. It is disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. NPCC © 2016 Document information These Guidance Notes have been produced by the Information Management for the Police Service Group on behalf of the NPCC DP, FOI and RM Portfolio Group and were endorsed by NPCC Cabinet/Chief Constables’ Council. It will be updated according to legislative and policy changes and re-published as required. 2 Content Section Page 1 Background 4 4 2 Responsibilities for Records Retention & Disposal 4 3 Risk 4 4 Benefits of a Retention Schedule 5 5 Disposal 5 6 Management of Police Information (MoPI) 5 7 Maintenance 5 8 Glossary 5 9 Records Retention Tables 6 • Assets and Products 7 • Crime and Case Files 11 • Detecting 15 • Finance 23 • Information 29 • Organisation, Programmes & Projects 32 • People 37 • Preventing 43 • Property 47 • Prosecution 50 Appendix A : Table of Retention Periods 3 1. Background 1.1 The NPCC Guidance on The Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police records has been produced by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) to assist police forces in their statutory responsibility to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) / Data Protection Act 2018, The Code of Practice on the Management of Police Information (2005) and other legislative requirements. The Information Management – Management of Police Information section of the Authorised Professional Practice (APP) is the detailed guidance referred to in the Code of Practice and supersedes ACPO (2010) Guidance on Management of Police Information. -
Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control. -
1 Intelligence, Policing and the Use of Algorithmic Analysis
Intelligence, policing and the use of algorithmic analysis: a freedom of information- based study Marion Oswald (University of Winchester) and Jamie Grace (Sheffield Hallam University)1 1. Introduction This article explores some of the legal and societal issues around algorithmic and computational intelligence analysis used within policing in the United Kingdom; methods which interlink with the use of so-called 'Big Data' and are commonly badged as data science. These techniques are used in modern law enforcement as aides to decision-making and evaluation, mapping crimes, and even predicting where the next crimes are likely to occur, and hence, purportedly assisting the police to prevent crimes occurring. In an era of austerity in which police are under pressure to do more with less, these techniques promise to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of a police force. Conversely, the use of algorithms combined with the rise of Big Data presents society with a number of privacy and ethical concerns. There has been a call for more predictive policing in the United Kingdom, using 'Big Data' techniques in intelligence analysis, as demonstrated by the National Policing Vision for 2016, which hopes that ‘predictive analysis and real-time access to intelligence and tasking in the field will be available on modern mobile devices.’2 This suggests the increasing importance of predictive policing, allowing forces to ‘drive improvements in investigations, proactive patrolling, the protection of vulnerable people and the management of offenders and dangerous people.’3 This statement indicates the variety of different aims to which algorithmic methods may contribute, both on the macro and the micro (individual) level, each of which involves differing benefits and risks. -
Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61
JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ ORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONTENTS Page NPAST AND PRESENT Notes and News . 5 Number 61 (2008) Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk Avril Lumley Prior . 7 The Peterborough Chronicles Nicholas Karn and Edmund King . 17 Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c. 1490-1500 Alan Rogers . 30 Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 Colin Davenport . 42 George London at Castle Ashby Peter McKay . 56 Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape Jenny Burt . 64 Politics in Late Victorian and Edwardian Northamptonshire John Adams . 78 The Wakerley Calciner Furnaces Jack Rodney Laundon . 86 Joan Wake and the Northamptonshire Record Society Sir Hereward Wake . 88 The Northamptonshire Reference Database Barry and Liz Taylor . 94 Book Reviews . 95 Obituary Notices . 102 Index . 103 Cover illustration: Courteenhall House built in 1791 by Sir William Wake, 9th Baronet. Samuel Saxon, architect, and Humphry Repton, landscape designer. Number 61 2008 £3.50 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2008 Number 61 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk . 7 Avril Lumley Prior The Peterborough Chronicles . 17 Nicholas Karn and Edmund King Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c.1490-1500 . 30 Alan Rogers Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 . 42 Colin Davenport George London at Castle Ashby . 56 Peter McKay Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape . -
Safe from Harm? 10 Years After Soham
Safe from harm? 10 years after Soham... Foreword The past 10 years, as a father, school governor and solicitor representing victims of child abuse, I have considered from different perspectives the impact of measures taken in response to the Soham tragedy. At the time of the murders in the summer of 2002 steps had already been initiated to improve upon child protection measures, under the Police Act 1997. However, further steps were taken, after Soham, to provide greater protection. In the past 10 years, from my different perspectives, I have had cause to wonder whether those steps have had the kind of beneficial effect that we all hoped for. I became concerned that, perhaps, inappropriate individuals were still working in schools. I therefore commissioned this report to ascertain whether those perceptions were real or imaginary. The information collated from the majority of England’s local education authorities supports my concern that there are still too many people gaining access to children, for their own iniquitous behaviour. Of equal concern is that some local education authorities were unable to provide answers to the requests, as they do not collate the statistics. As to those authorities that did respond, the replies reveal a high number of allegations of abuse and consequential action taken. This suggests further work needs to be done and I am delighted that so many stakeholders have participated in the report which, I hope, will promote further contributions on this very important subject. Malcolm Underhill Partner, IBB Solicitors Safe from harm? | 10 years after Soham | Page 3 Introduction Freedom of information..... -
Restorative Justice Cover-02
Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the harm caused by crime Roger Graef Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the Harm Caused by Crime Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the Harm Caused by Crime Roger Graef edited and additional material by Marian Liebmann CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN FOUNDATION, LONDON Dedication To Martin Wright, whose vision of restorative justice has not obscured his commitment to rigorous scholarship. This vision inspired me to see the potential of restorative justice to change our lives. Published by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation United Kingdom Branch 98 Portland Place London W1B 1ET Tel: 020 7636 5313 © 2000 Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The right of Roger Graef to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved; unauthorised reproduction of any part of this work in any medium is strictly prohibited. ISBN 0 903319 92 6 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Designed by Andrew Shoolbred Printed by Expression Printers Ltd, IP23 8HH Distributed by Turnaround Publisher Services Ltd, Unit 3, Olympia Trading Estate, Coburg Road, Wood Green, London N22 6TZ Tel: 020 8829 3000, Fax: 020 8881 5088, E-mail: [email protected] Cover photo: Still from In Search of Law and Order – UK (Channel 4). Contents Author’s Acknowledgements 6 Foreword by Ben Whitaker 7 Introduction 9 Chapter 1: The Need for Change 13 Chapter 2: Principles of Restorative Justice 18 Chapter 3: A Brief History 22 Chapter 4: The Victim 27 Chapter 5: The Offender 33 Chapter 6: The Community 38 Chapter 7: What Choices are There? 42 Chapter 8: Current Services 50 Chapter 9: New Government Legislation 55 Chapter 10: The Future 58 Retributive and Restorative Justice: A Comparison 63 Glossary 64 Further Reading 67 Organisations Involved in Restorative Justice 69 Index 71 Author’s Acknowledgements John Harding, one of the pioneers of restorative justice in Britain, has been extremely helpful. -
Travel Report JO March09.Doc – Julia Overton March 2009 2 Screen Australia – March 2009
T R IDFA & World Congress of Science and Factual Producers 2008, O with additional London meetings P Julia Overton, Investment and Development Manager – Documentary The objectives for attending IDFA and World Congress of Science and E Factual Producers were many. To have face-to-face meetings with potential co-producing partners, broadcasters, commissioning editors, sales agents and distributors who could work with Australian companies to enable R developed projects to be produced and finished projects to find a place in the market. To support the Australian filmmakers attending the events – in the case of IDFA it was those who had projects screening in the festival or who were pitching projects in the Forum or private meetings. To observe which L documentaries were finding an audience, and in what form. And to establish new contacts, particularly in the area of science producing, where the cost of production is such that numerous co-production partners are usually E essential. Attending the two events back-to-back was an interesting conjunction of market/festival. It is best expressed via two conversations I had on my first V day at each event. When asking a filmmaker at IDFA why they were there I was told it was with a film which was a ‘post-Brechtian deconstruction of the Israeli Palestinian conflict’ and on asking the same question at World A Congress the response was ‘to sell 26 hours on killer reptiles’. It gave a wonderful insight to the diversity of the world that is documentary. London R Before the festivals, time was spent in London having meetings with some of those with whom Screen Australia deals on a regular basis. -
Stranger Than Fiction
stf_2007 23/08/2007 11:30 Page i Stranger Than Fiction Documentary Film Festival and Market 13th-16th September 2007 stf_2007 23/08/2007 11:30 Page ii Introduction It’s my great pleasure to welcome This year’s opening feature The of the films screening, as well as you to this year’s Stranger Than Undertaking stands out as one of the contributions from David Norris, Fiction Festival. This is the sixth most beautiful films to come out of Louis de Paor, Stephen Rea and year of the event, and the first Ireland in many years. Richard Boyd Barrett. without the indomitable Gráinne The feature-length documentary This is perhaps a golden age of Humphreys at the helm. With continues to thrive on the inter- documentary film, and for the four Gráinne’s departure, Irish Film national scene, and I have selected 14 days of Stranger Than Fiction, I’d Institute Director Mark Mulqueen films which I hope you will at turns encourage you to come to the IFI to decided to approach this year’s find provocative, entertaining, heart- meet the filmmakers, to partake in festival in a different way, opting to breaking, hilarious; and always, I the market, to engage in the discus- bring an independent film-maker on hope, deeply affecting. Truth is indeed sions, and to see the finest of docu- board as Festival Director. stranger that fiction, and documen- mentary films from Ireland as well as As a documentary-maker used to taries tap into humanity in all its from throughout the world. submitting films to such festivals, I vagaries in ways that drama can’t; was delighted to be asked to put witness the delightful and witty James Kelly together this event. -
Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92
Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92 The Rt. Hon. Edmund Dell (Chairman 1981–87) Sir Richard Attenborough (Deputy Chairman 1981–86) (Director 1987) (Chairman 1988–91) George Russell (Deputy Chairman 1 Jan 1987–88) Sir Brian Bailey (1 July 1985–89) (Deputy Chairman 1990) Sir Michael Bishop CBE (Deputy Chairman 1991) (Chairman 1992–) David Plowright (Deputy Chairman 1992–) Lord Blake (1 Sept 1983–87) William Brown (1981–85) Carmen Callil (1 July 1985–90) Jennifer d’Abo (1 April 1986–87) Richard Dunn (1 Jan 1989–90) Greg Dyke (11 April 1988–90) Paul Fox (1 July 1985–87) James Gatward (1 July 1984–89) John Gau (1 July 1984–88) Roger Graef (1981–85) Bert Hardy (1992–) Dr Glyn Tegai Hughes (1983–86) Eleri Wynne Jones (22 Jan 1987–90) Anne Lapping (1 Jan 1989–) Mary McAleese (1992–) David McCall (1981–85) John McGrath (1990–) The Hon. Mrs Sara Morrison (1983–85) Sir David Nicholas CBE (1992–) Anthony Pragnell (1 July 1983–88) Usha Prashar (1991–) Peter Rogers (1982–91) Michael Scott (1 July 1984–87) Anthony Smith (1981–84) Anne Sofer (1981–84) Brian Tesler (1981–85) Professor David Vines (1 Jan 1987–91) Joy Whitby (1981–84) 435 Appendix B: Channel 4 Major Programme Awards 1983–92 British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) 1983: The Snowman – Best Children’s Programme – Drama 1984: Another Audience With Dame Edna – Best Light Entertainment 1987: Channel 4 News – Best News or Outside Broadcast Coverage 1987: The Lowest of the Low – Special Award for Foreign Documentary 1987: Network 7 – Special Award for Originality