DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Crime and Consequence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Crime and Consequence The Monument Fellowship CRIME AND CONSEQUENCE What should happen to people who commit criminal offences? Edited by Anne Fox & Alison Frater “I can’t think of a better book on a more important subject.” Freddy Gray, Deputy Editor, The Spectator The Monument Fellowship CRIME AND CONSEQUENCE What should happen to people who commit criminal offences? Edited by Anne Fox & Alison Frater CONTENTS Acknowledgements viii Foreword Michael Spurr x The Monument Trust into the future Mark Woodruff xiii Introduction: Crime and Consequences Anne Fox and Alison Frater 1 Section 1 What happens to people who commit criminal offences – facts & figures 5 Section 2 Unintended consequences 15 Righting Wrongs: The need for dialogue Fergus McNeill 17 Rehabilitation – A new perspective for a new era Lisa Rowles and Kieran McCartan 21 Toward better punishment Phil Bowen 30 Punishing the most vulnerable Sophie Gibson 37 Exploring learning history to inform sentence practice Mark Humphries 45 The fallacy of rehabilitation E.R. Smyth 51 iii The case for custody The Tartan Con 57 Relationships are essential for rehabilitation Lord Farmer 61 Conscience is learnt through shame Gerard Lemos 68 British prisoners abroad Pauline Crowe 76 (Love and) Respect David McGuire 83 Applying Montessori principles to rehabilitation Nati Beltrán 88 ‘Tough on crime’ – why beliefs shape policy Penelope Gibbs with Anne Fox and Roma Hooper 97 Crime: A sign of our failure to organise for the common good Teresa Parker 103 Taking people seriously: Debating matters beyond bars Jacob Reynolds 107 More or less? Rob Allen 113 The business case for employing people who have committed criminal offences Anne Fox in conversation with Darren Burns, National Recruitment Ambassador, Timpson & Head of the Timpson Foundation 120 Criminals in your family and in your society Bruce Child 128 Writing about the perspective of children whose parents are imprisoned Lucy Baldwin 130 Who defines what is a crime? Dr John Davies 137 iv Why the ‘Why’ matters Judge Alex Calabrese and Amanda Berman 140 Developing a new sense of purpose: The role and value of access to arts and culture Richard Ings 149 The relationship between public attitudes, policy decisions by government and scrutiny by parliament Gemma Buckland 154 The ability to heal people within our current system Edwina Grosvenor 161 Section 3 Answering the question creatively 165 Construction of a criminal (poem) Talia Jay 167 Our voices should be heard (poetry, plays, text) Clean Break members 168 Crime and expectation (poem) Ashleigh Nugent 180 Creating identity through the arts Re/creations collective: Kristianne Drake, Xavier Fiddes and Dr Ronda Gowland-Pryde 183 The play is the thing Blackash collective 193 Killing the morning David Kendall 206 Making it out of prison – designing for change through ‘making’ Lorraine Gamman and Adam Thorpe 212 An alarm for every occasion Sean Bw Parker 218 Section 4 Alternatives to prison 219 v Diverting children from the criminal justice system Carmen Robin-D’Cruz 221 What? Do you mean no prisons? Charlotte Weinberg and Deborah H. Drake 227 Putting the community back into payback Dave Nicholson 234 Child to parent violence Restorative solutions Gary Stephenson 241 The case for decriminalisation Mark Alexander 249 Encourage or punish? The view of a prisoner Steve Shill 252 Change our attitude, change our approach Neil Wilson 254 Let the punishment fit the criminal Ben Leapman 256 Section 5 Images from ‘Another Me’ and ‘A Feeling We All Share’ – Koestler Arts exhibitions in 2019 259 Section 6 Not all crimes and not all who commit them are the same 269 Offences committed by women: Recognise the role of abuse Dame Vera Baird 271 Older men in prison: time to think differently? Louise Ridley 274 What should happen to people who commit murder? Ben Crewe, Susie Hulley, Serena Wright 281 The impact of criminal records from our youth: The case for change Anne Fox in conversation with Christopher Stacey, co-director of Unlock 288 vi What should happen to people who commit sexual offences? Lynn Saunders and Belinda Winder 296 Young people, arts and justice Alison Frater 301 You’re never really free until your mind is free Dawn Harrison 305 People with speech, language and communication needs: Are courts fair? Kim Turner 311 Crime and criminalising young people Anne Fox in conversation with Enver Solomon – CEO, Just for Kids Law 316 Transgender in the 21st Century prison system Sarah-Jane Baker 326 Hate crime: Restorative solutions Tehmina Kazi 329 What should happen to Muslim women who commit criminal offences? Sofia Buncy 338 Tackling the criminalisation of childhood neurodevelopmental disability Professor Nathan Hughes 344 Saints and Sinners: UK veterans in the criminal justice system Tony Wright 350 All equal before the law Simon Kenny 357 What should happen to people who commit criminal offences?: Exploring the issues Sarah Turvey 359 Contributors 363 References 379 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This collective volume has been a collective effort and we wouldn’t have it any other way. Clinks and the National Criminal Justice Arts Alliance work wherever possible in partnership with others, we believe together we can achieve much more than we ever could alone. We are grateful to the Monument Fellowship for the opportunity to curate this year’s book and for access to their networks and contacts from whom the contributions were sourced. Mark Woodruff and the trustees of The Woolbeding Charity, formerly The Monument Trust have provided unstinting support for our own work and for the joint work of the Monument Fellowship. We are delighted to be able to continue to add to the impressive legacy of the Trust which invested in so many innovations to improve outcomes for people at risk of entry to or already in the criminal justice system, over so many years. We are indebted to those individuals and organisations who have contributed to this volume from their professional and lived experience. We are also grateful to those who have supported them to do so, including the wonderfully helpful Paula Harriott and Soruche Saajedi of the Prisoner Policy Network at the Prison Reform Trust. They spread the word and made it possible for this volume to benefit from contributions from their network members, people currently in prison. Thanks also go to prison staff and friends and family of people in prison who made it easier for drafts to be sent back and forth. Thanks also go to Matthew Halliday also of the Prison Reform viii Acknowledgements Trust for reproduction of the graphs from Prison: the facts – Bromley Briefings Summer 2019, to Sally Taylor, Fiona Curran, Jo Tapp and the team at Koestler Arts for the reproduction of stunning images from the 2019 UK exhibitions ‘Another Me’ and ‘A Feeling We All Share’ and Sarah Turvey of Prison Reading Groups for the guide to exploring the issues in the book which we’ve been able to include. Thanks, as with anything we do, are owed to the Clinks staff – especially working in admin, communications and National Criminal Justice Arts Alliance roles. For this project we relied on really helpful and professional external support from the brilliant Claire Annals, for copyediting and proofreading, Mick and Tom Keates for design and Brian Parish for print. They’ve brought all the hard work together in a volume we hope you’ll enjoy reading and will recommend to others. ix FOREWORD Michael Spurr Last year we moved to live in a village for the first time and a few weeks ago I gave a talk for the local community in the village Church entitled ‘Reflections on Crime and Punishment’. The talk was well attended and from the feedback – well received. It wasn’t a talk to promote a particular agenda or to explicitly present a point of view but rather I simply presented facts about the realities of the Criminal Justice System today and reflections on changes that have occurred over the 36 years I have worked in it. It’s fair to say that most people came along knowing very little about the system and went away surprised and a little shocked about what they learned They weren’t aware, for example, that sentences today are much longer, harsher and more punitive than at any time since the abolition of capital punishment 50 years ago; they weren’t aware of what actually constitutes a custodial sentence, release arrangements or the licence restrictions placed on individuals following release; and they were amazed by the fact that there are over 7000 prisoners in custody for breach of those licence conditions. This wasn’t really a surprise. Most people have limited contact with the Criminal Justice System and for entirely understandable reasons give it little thought. The complexities of sentencing in particular are a mystery (including to many who work within the system!) and the execution of the sentence and its impact on individuals is routinely misunderstood or misrepresented in the media. But this isn’t a healthy position for our society. x Foreword Over the last two decades there has been a marked shift to what Professor Anthony Bottoms describes as ‘popular punitiveness’. Only a few days ago the Prime Minister promised to bring forward legislation in the Queens Speech to toughen sentences for serious crime. An urgent review of Sentencing is currently being conducted by the Ministry of Justice but the direction of this review and the outcome required has clearly been set already Of course in any civilised society crime has to be dealt with and most people (including me and almost all offenders I’ve worked with) accept this must include retribution for the offence. Punishment is necessary and important but it should be proportionate (the ‘just deserts’-principle).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 12-18 Videofest.Org Video Association of Dallas Make Films That Matter
    ANGELIKA FILM CENTER OCTOBER 12-18 VIDEOFEST.ORG VIDEO ASSOCIATION OF DALLAS MAKE FILMS THAT MATTER UNIVERSITY OF The Department of Art and TEXAS ARLINGTON Art History at UTA has an ART+ART HISTORY excellent reputation for FILM/VIDEO PROGRAM grooming young filmmakers, preparing WWW.UTA.EDU/ART 817-272-2891 them for the creative challenges and emotional rigors of the motion picture industry. Call our advising sta to find out how you can train to be a vital part of the film industry. Art Art History Department 2 CONTENTS 2 BROUGHT TO YOU BY 3 2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 4 SPONSORS & CONTRIBUTORS 8 WELCOME BY BART WEISS 10 ABOUT OUR JURORS 14 TEXAS SHOW JURORS 16 KOVACS AWARD 18 HONOREES 26 SCREENINGS 52 SCHEDULE 1 BROUGHT TO YOU BY BARTON WEISS YA’KE SMITH Artistic Director Festival Bumpers RAQUEL CHAPA MARK WICKERSHAM Managing Director KARL SCHAEFFER Transportation BOXOFFICE: PREKINDLE SELIG POLYSCOPE COMPANY CAMERON NELSON Videography Technical Supervisor REDMAN I AM CHRISTIAN VASQUEZ Trophies DAVID GRANDBERRY Technical Assistant MATTHIEU CARTAL DAKOTA FORD MARISSA ALANIS MATTHEW GEISE MARGARITA BIRNBAUM VIVIAN GRAY AMY MARTIN Outreach MIKE MILLER YUMA MORRIS KELLY J KITCHENS ELEONORA SOLDATI Interns RONI HUMMEL Media Relations/Entertainment Publicity BETH JASPER ALVIN HYSONG DANA TURNER MARSHALL PITMAN Program Editor WES SUTTON Programmers TAMITHA CURIEL Newsletter Editor RON SIMON Curator of Television Pasily Center CYNTHIA CHAPA Program Content ED BARK Critic Uncle Barkey SULLIVANPERKINS MICHAEL CAIN Graphic Design Filmmaker, former head of AFI Dallas Festival DESIGN TEXAS - UT ARLINGTON JOSH MILLS Program Book Design It’s Alive! Media & Management DEV SHAPIRO Kovacs Committee DARREN DITTRICH Webpage 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS JEFFREY A.
    [Show full text]
  • Social & Legal Studies
    Social & Legal Studies http://sls.sagepub.com/ 'Setting 'Em Up': Personal, Familial and Institutional Grooming in the Sexual Abuse of Children Anne-Marie Mcalinden Social & Legal Studies 2006 15: 339 DOI: 10.1177/0964663906066613 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Social & Legal Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sls.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sls.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/15/3/339.refs.html >> Version of Record - Aug 29, 2006 What is This? Downloaded from sls.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ALABAMA on August 13, 2012 ‘SETTING ’EM UP’: PERSONAL, FAMILIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL GROOMING IN THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN ANNE-MARIE MCALINDEN Queen’s University Belfast, UK ABSTRACT The term ‘grooming’ has been used to describe the offender’s actions during the preparatory stage of sexual abuse. This article will argue that current discourses on grooming have created ambiguities and misunderstandings about child sexual abuse. In particular, the popular focus on ‘stranger danger’ belies the fact that the majority of children are abused by someone well known to them, where grooming can also occur. Current discourses also neglect other important facets of the sex offending pattern. They fail to consider that offenders may groom not only the child but also their family and even the local community who may act as the gatekeepers of access.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science
    Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Other responses Contents-Other responses Organisation Name Response Type ACPO Substantive Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Substantive Analytical Services International Ltd Response on behalf of Analytical Services International Ltd both as an academic researcher and a forensic service provider Association of Forensic Service Providers' Body Substantive Fluid Forum CCL Forensics Substantive Cellmark Forensic Services Substantive Crown Prosecution Service Substantive DSTL Substantive Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine Substantive Forensic Access Ltd. Substantive Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spetrometry Substantive (FIRMS) Network Forensic Science Northern Ireland Substantive Forensic Science Service 1 Substantive Forensic Science Service 2 Substantive Forensic Science Society Substantive Forensic Telecommunication Services Ltd Substantive Forensic Working Group for the Partnership Substantive against Wildlife Crime Freelance Scientists (but aligned to universities) Substantive Home Office Scientific Development Branch Substantive (name changed to Centre for Applied Science and Technology in April 2011) Intellect (trade association for the IT, telecoms Substantive and electronics industries) LGC Forensics Substantive LTG Executive Committee Substantive The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen Substantive National DNA Database Ethics Group Substantive National Physical Laboratory Substantive National Policing Improvement Agency Substantive Natural History Museum Substantive Prospect
    [Show full text]
  • National Guidance on the Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records
    National Guidance on the minimum standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police Records These GUIDANCE NOTES contain information to assist policing in England, Wales & Northern Ireland. It is OFFICIAL under the Government Security Classification Scheme. It is disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. NPCC © 2016 Document information These Guidance Notes have been produced by the Information Management for the Police Service Group on behalf of the NPCC DP, FOI and RM Portfolio Group and were endorsed by NPCC Cabinet/Chief Constables’ Council. It will be updated according to legislative and policy changes and re-published as required. 2 Content Section Page 1 Background 4 4 2 Responsibilities for Records Retention & Disposal 4 3 Risk 4 4 Benefits of a Retention Schedule 5 5 Disposal 5 6 Management of Police Information (MoPI) 5 7 Maintenance 5 8 Glossary 5 9 Records Retention Tables 6 • Assets and Products 7 • Crime and Case Files 11 • Detecting 15 • Finance 23 • Information 29 • Organisation, Programmes & Projects 32 • People 37 • Preventing 43 • Property 47 • Prosecution 50 Appendix A : Table of Retention Periods 3 1. Background 1.1 The NPCC Guidance on The Minimum Standards for the Retention and Disposal of Police records has been produced by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) to assist police forces in their statutory responsibility to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) / Data Protection Act 2018, The Code of Practice on the Management of Police Information (2005) and other legislative requirements. The Information Management – Management of Police Information section of the Authorised Professional Practice (APP) is the detailed guidance referred to in the Code of Practice and supersedes ACPO (2010) Guidance on Management of Police Information.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Intelligence, Policing and the Use of Algorithmic Analysis
    Intelligence, policing and the use of algorithmic analysis: a freedom of information- based study Marion Oswald (University of Winchester) and Jamie Grace (Sheffield Hallam University)1 1. Introduction This article explores some of the legal and societal issues around algorithmic and computational intelligence analysis used within policing in the United Kingdom; methods which interlink with the use of so-called 'Big Data' and are commonly badged as data science. These techniques are used in modern law enforcement as aides to decision-making and evaluation, mapping crimes, and even predicting where the next crimes are likely to occur, and hence, purportedly assisting the police to prevent crimes occurring. In an era of austerity in which police are under pressure to do more with less, these techniques promise to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of a police force. Conversely, the use of algorithms combined with the rise of Big Data presents society with a number of privacy and ethical concerns. There has been a call for more predictive policing in the United Kingdom, using 'Big Data' techniques in intelligence analysis, as demonstrated by the National Policing Vision for 2016, which hopes that ‘predictive analysis and real-time access to intelligence and tasking in the field will be available on modern mobile devices.’2 This suggests the increasing importance of predictive policing, allowing forces to ‘drive improvements in investigations, proactive patrolling, the protection of vulnerable people and the management of offenders and dangerous people.’3 This statement indicates the variety of different aims to which algorithmic methods may contribute, both on the macro and the micro (individual) level, each of which involves differing benefits and risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61
    JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ ORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONTENTS Page NPAST AND PRESENT Notes and News . 5 Number 61 (2008) Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk Avril Lumley Prior . 7 The Peterborough Chronicles Nicholas Karn and Edmund King . 17 Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c. 1490-1500 Alan Rogers . 30 Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 Colin Davenport . 42 George London at Castle Ashby Peter McKay . 56 Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape Jenny Burt . 64 Politics in Late Victorian and Edwardian Northamptonshire John Adams . 78 The Wakerley Calciner Furnaces Jack Rodney Laundon . 86 Joan Wake and the Northamptonshire Record Society Sir Hereward Wake . 88 The Northamptonshire Reference Database Barry and Liz Taylor . 94 Book Reviews . 95 Obituary Notices . 102 Index . 103 Cover illustration: Courteenhall House built in 1791 by Sir William Wake, 9th Baronet. Samuel Saxon, architect, and Humphry Repton, landscape designer. Number 61 2008 £3.50 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2008 Number 61 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk . 7 Avril Lumley Prior The Peterborough Chronicles . 17 Nicholas Karn and Edmund King Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c.1490-1500 . 30 Alan Rogers Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 . 42 Colin Davenport George London at Castle Ashby . 56 Peter McKay Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape .
    [Show full text]
  • Safe from Harm? 10 Years After Soham
    Safe from harm? 10 years after Soham... Foreword The past 10 years, as a father, school governor and solicitor representing victims of child abuse, I have considered from different perspectives the impact of measures taken in response to the Soham tragedy. At the time of the murders in the summer of 2002 steps had already been initiated to improve upon child protection measures, under the Police Act 1997. However, further steps were taken, after Soham, to provide greater protection. In the past 10 years, from my different perspectives, I have had cause to wonder whether those steps have had the kind of beneficial effect that we all hoped for. I became concerned that, perhaps, inappropriate individuals were still working in schools. I therefore commissioned this report to ascertain whether those perceptions were real or imaginary. The information collated from the majority of England’s local education authorities supports my concern that there are still too many people gaining access to children, for their own iniquitous behaviour. Of equal concern is that some local education authorities were unable to provide answers to the requests, as they do not collate the statistics. As to those authorities that did respond, the replies reveal a high number of allegations of abuse and consequential action taken. This suggests further work needs to be done and I am delighted that so many stakeholders have participated in the report which, I hope, will promote further contributions on this very important subject. Malcolm Underhill Partner, IBB Solicitors Safe from harm? | 10 years after Soham | Page 3 Introduction Freedom of information.....
    [Show full text]
  • Restorative Justice Cover-02
    Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the harm caused by crime Roger Graef Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the Harm Caused by Crime Why Restorative Justice? Repairing the Harm Caused by Crime Roger Graef edited and additional material by Marian Liebmann CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN FOUNDATION, LONDON Dedication To Martin Wright, whose vision of restorative justice has not obscured his commitment to rigorous scholarship. This vision inspired me to see the potential of restorative justice to change our lives. Published by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation United Kingdom Branch 98 Portland Place London W1B 1ET Tel: 020 7636 5313 © 2000 Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The right of Roger Graef to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved; unauthorised reproduction of any part of this work in any medium is strictly prohibited. ISBN 0 903319 92 6 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Designed by Andrew Shoolbred Printed by Expression Printers Ltd, IP23 8HH Distributed by Turnaround Publisher Services Ltd, Unit 3, Olympia Trading Estate, Coburg Road, Wood Green, London N22 6TZ Tel: 020 8829 3000, Fax: 020 8881 5088, E-mail: [email protected] Cover photo: Still from In Search of Law and Order – UK (Channel 4). Contents Author’s Acknowledgements 6 Foreword by Ben Whitaker 7 Introduction 9 Chapter 1: The Need for Change 13 Chapter 2: Principles of Restorative Justice 18 Chapter 3: A Brief History 22 Chapter 4: The Victim 27 Chapter 5: The Offender 33 Chapter 6: The Community 38 Chapter 7: What Choices are There? 42 Chapter 8: Current Services 50 Chapter 9: New Government Legislation 55 Chapter 10: The Future 58 Retributive and Restorative Justice: A Comparison 63 Glossary 64 Further Reading 67 Organisations Involved in Restorative Justice 69 Index 71 Author’s Acknowledgements John Harding, one of the pioneers of restorative justice in Britain, has been extremely helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Report JO March09.Doc – Julia Overton March 2009 2 Screen Australia – March 2009
    T R IDFA & World Congress of Science and Factual Producers 2008, O with additional London meetings P Julia Overton, Investment and Development Manager – Documentary The objectives for attending IDFA and World Congress of Science and E Factual Producers were many. To have face-to-face meetings with potential co-producing partners, broadcasters, commissioning editors, sales agents and distributors who could work with Australian companies to enable R developed projects to be produced and finished projects to find a place in the market. To support the Australian filmmakers attending the events – in the case of IDFA it was those who had projects screening in the festival or who were pitching projects in the Forum or private meetings. To observe which L documentaries were finding an audience, and in what form. And to establish new contacts, particularly in the area of science producing, where the cost of production is such that numerous co-production partners are usually E essential. Attending the two events back-to-back was an interesting conjunction of market/festival. It is best expressed via two conversations I had on my first V day at each event. When asking a filmmaker at IDFA why they were there I was told it was with a film which was a ‘post-Brechtian deconstruction of the Israeli Palestinian conflict’ and on asking the same question at World A Congress the response was ‘to sell 26 hours on killer reptiles’. It gave a wonderful insight to the diversity of the world that is documentary. London R Before the festivals, time was spent in London having meetings with some of those with whom Screen Australia deals on a regular basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Stranger Than Fiction
    stf_2007 23/08/2007 11:30 Page i Stranger Than Fiction Documentary Film Festival and Market 13th-16th September 2007 stf_2007 23/08/2007 11:30 Page ii Introduction It’s my great pleasure to welcome This year’s opening feature The of the films screening, as well as you to this year’s Stranger Than Undertaking stands out as one of the contributions from David Norris, Fiction Festival. This is the sixth most beautiful films to come out of Louis de Paor, Stephen Rea and year of the event, and the first Ireland in many years. Richard Boyd Barrett. without the indomitable Gráinne The feature-length documentary This is perhaps a golden age of Humphreys at the helm. With continues to thrive on the inter- documentary film, and for the four Gráinne’s departure, Irish Film national scene, and I have selected 14 days of Stranger Than Fiction, I’d Institute Director Mark Mulqueen films which I hope you will at turns encourage you to come to the IFI to decided to approach this year’s find provocative, entertaining, heart- meet the filmmakers, to partake in festival in a different way, opting to breaking, hilarious; and always, I the market, to engage in the discus- bring an independent film-maker on hope, deeply affecting. Truth is indeed sions, and to see the finest of docu- board as Festival Director. stranger that fiction, and documen- mentary films from Ireland as well as As a documentary-maker used to taries tap into humanity in all its from throughout the world. submitting films to such festivals, I vagaries in ways that drama can’t; was delighted to be asked to put witness the delightful and witty James Kelly together this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92
    Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92 The Rt. Hon. Edmund Dell (Chairman 1981–87) Sir Richard Attenborough (Deputy Chairman 1981–86) (Director 1987) (Chairman 1988–91) George Russell (Deputy Chairman 1 Jan 1987–88) Sir Brian Bailey (1 July 1985–89) (Deputy Chairman 1990) Sir Michael Bishop CBE (Deputy Chairman 1991) (Chairman 1992–) David Plowright (Deputy Chairman 1992–) Lord Blake (1 Sept 1983–87) William Brown (1981–85) Carmen Callil (1 July 1985–90) Jennifer d’Abo (1 April 1986–87) Richard Dunn (1 Jan 1989–90) Greg Dyke (11 April 1988–90) Paul Fox (1 July 1985–87) James Gatward (1 July 1984–89) John Gau (1 July 1984–88) Roger Graef (1981–85) Bert Hardy (1992–) Dr Glyn Tegai Hughes (1983–86) Eleri Wynne Jones (22 Jan 1987–90) Anne Lapping (1 Jan 1989–) Mary McAleese (1992–) David McCall (1981–85) John McGrath (1990–) The Hon. Mrs Sara Morrison (1983–85) Sir David Nicholas CBE (1992–) Anthony Pragnell (1 July 1983–88) Usha Prashar (1991–) Peter Rogers (1982–91) Michael Scott (1 July 1984–87) Anthony Smith (1981–84) Anne Sofer (1981–84) Brian Tesler (1981–85) Professor David Vines (1 Jan 1987–91) Joy Whitby (1981–84) 435 Appendix B: Channel 4 Major Programme Awards 1983–92 British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) 1983: The Snowman – Best Children’s Programme – Drama 1984: Another Audience With Dame Edna – Best Light Entertainment 1987: Channel 4 News – Best News or Outside Broadcast Coverage 1987: The Lowest of the Low – Special Award for Foreign Documentary 1987: Network 7 – Special Award for Originality
    [Show full text]