Sewer Odor Control

Home , WIPL

FRANK T. MARTINEZ rv OF Los ANGELE Office of the City Clerk CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK Council and Public Services KAREN E. KALFAYAN Room 395, City Hall Executive Officer Los Angeles, CA 90012 Council File Information - (213) 978-1044 General Information - (213) 978-1133 When :maldng inquiries Fax: (213) 978-1040 relative t.o this matter refer to File No. CLAUDIA M. DUNN ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA Chief, Council and Public Services Division 03-0153-82 MAYOR

July 5, 2006

Office of the Mayor City Administrative Officer Chief Legislative Analyst Board of Public Works

RE: NOTE AND FILE THE BUREAU OF SANITATION REPORT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS RELATIVE TO SEWER ODOR CONTROL

At the meeting of the Council held JUNE 28. 2006, the following action was taken:

Attached report adopted ...... ______Attached motion(-) adopted ...... ______Attached resolution adopted ...... ______FORTHWITH...... X Mayor concurred ...... ______To the Mayor FORTHWITH ...... ···------Motion adopted to approve communication recommendation(s) ...... ______Motion adopted to approve committee report recommendation(s) ... X

PLACE IN FILES

City Clerk kw

AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 33 File No. 03-0153-82

TO THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Your ENERGY AND ENVIRbNMENT COMMITTEE

report as follows:

Public Comments

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to sewer odor control.

Recommendation for Council action:

NOTE and FILE the May 8, 2006 Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) report and supplemental materials submitted in Committee on June 21, 2006 relative to sewer odor control, inasmuch as this report and supplemental materials are _for information only and no Council action is required.

Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable

Summary:

At its regular June 21, 2006 meeting, your Committee considered a May 8, 2006 BOS report and supplemental materials submitted in Committee relative to sewer odor control. According to the BOS, all sewers generate a rotten egg-odor caused by hydrogen sulfide which is produced by bacteria in the sewage. Significant amounts of hydrogen sulfide gas are produced where sewers bend, change slope, construct, and pass through junction and drop structures. This gas can escape from the sewer system through maintenance holes and sewer laterals in areas with high sewer gas pressure. The pressure usually increased as the sewer levels rise each day. Large sewers with high flows are particularly susceptible to odor problems caused by the release of hydrogen sulfide gas.

The BOS then provided an overview of its policies for the investigating and responding to sewer odor complaints and stated that wherever possible, the BOS will take corrective action. In complicated problems are referred to engineers who review the field investigations and sewer design and perform field tests to develop plans to reduce or eliminate the odors. The BOS also provided an overview of its maintenance program for minimizing sewer odors.

Finally, the BOS stated that in 2001, extensive monitoring and testing was done to pinpoint the high sewer pressure areas in large sewers located near La Cienega Boulevard, Jefferson Boulevard and Rodeo Road. Three Air Treatment Facilities (ATFs) were planned and will begin construction to discharge treated sewer gas pressure. Interim carbon scrubbers are being used at these locations until the ATFs are completed. Additional ATFs are also planned for four locations on the recently completed ECIS and NEIS sewers in anticipation of higher sewer gas pressure (a map detailing the locations of the proposed ATFs is attached to the Council file).

After further consideration and having provided an opportunity for public comment, the Committee moved to note and file the May 8, 2006 Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) report and supplemental materials submitted in Committee on June 21, 2006 relative to sewer odor control, inasmuch as this report and supplemental materials are for information only and no Council action is required. This matter is now forwarded to the Council for its consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

MEMBER VOTE PERRY: ABSENT UJS ANGELES CJ11 cou~ml GARCETII: YES GREUEL: YES LABONGE: YES PADILLA: ABSENT FORTHWITH

ARL 6/21/06 #030153-S2.wpd

Page2 of 2 •

COUNCIL VOTE

Jun 28, 2006 10:21:46 AM, #3

Items for Which Public Hearings Have Been Held - Items 17-53 Voting on Item(s): 26,29,31-37,39-40,42-51,53 Roll Call

CARDENAS Yes GREUEL Yes HAHN Yes HUIZAR Yes LAB ONGE Absent PADILLA Absent PARKS Yes PERRY Yes REYES Yes ROSENDAHL Yes SMITH Yes WEISS Yes WESSON Yes ZINE Yes *GARCETTI Yes Present: 13, Yes: 13 No: 0 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUGGESTED NOTIFICATION OF COUNCIL ACTION Council File No. o~ -01 S) -S'L-

D Petitioner/Communicant ------D Council Member(s} ______jg! Board of Public Works (Mail Stop 465) jg! Office of the Mayor (w/o file) jg! City Administrative Officer (CAO) jg! Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA)

D Department of Public Works (DPW)

D City Attorney (w/ Bluesheet) (w/o Bluesheet)

D Controller

D Bureau of Engineering (BOE) (Mail Stop 901)

D Bureau of Street Services (BSS) (Mail Stop 550)

D Bureau of Contract Administration (BCA) (Mail Stop 480)

D Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL) (Mail Stop 545)

D Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) D D To report sawer- odors call ------

1 · ' • 1-866-44$EWER (1·&66-447·3911) · Lo

1 2 3 MH 53710078 Pre and PostECIS Startup Pressure Test Intersection of 41st Pl. & Trinity

0.3 ,...... ,·····················r·········································-u--·,-···············

0.2

0.1

-0.1

-0.2'------; 8!'.30,20040:00 9/ll20040:00 9!3,Z(X)40:00 9&20040:00 gn l2004 o.oo 9,912C040:00 9/l 1/20040:00 9/13,20040:00 Time

1- PostECIS - PreECIS I

4 5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ H2S Before and After

t, - - H2S Reduction with Magnesium Hydroxide (Odalog: OL05103484)

1"3 -, y-····- --,.- fa jKJll... fl. -- ] ,t "" 1>l 00 120 79

78 " '16

____ _ 73

71 Fri16 Salli• ~m -m ~20 -~ ~n Peiiod displayed: Thu Sep 15 · MOil Seo 26 (Oda File: Riverside Dr EO l ankerst-..n 113- l S.05 to 09-26-ffi.odaJ

INST - Mll"",[Oppm] Ma..;[150ppmJ

6 41 st Pl and Trinity (NOS) Rodeo and Grayburn (No. Branch) Pre- and Post ECIS H2S Pre- and Post ECIS H2S oo r ~c~~-c=c-c~~~~c~~- 80 70 70 60 60 e50 Iii Max H2S c. .e,40 DAl\l H2S v, w ~ 30 ~ 30 20 20 10 10 0 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep·04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 - I 11111 - 1

':..__-=.___ __ - -- "' ------_ ------= -

7 Ventilation Related Odor Complaints CD8,9and10 12 ----~------i 10 8

=, "-""-,,1,411- ._"""'_ ::1:-- Cl ...... ~~I -,.,

_...._. .,..__,.,.____. -~-~·-...... ·~.--~·••-.,;w__ .... _

8 9 Report Rep e l,;,s ·sewer malos olores Odors del drenaje We hope you never need to make this call, Esperamos que nunca tenga que hacer esta but to report a sewer odor to the City of Los llamada, pero si necesita reportar malos olores del Angeles, call the Citywide toll free drenaje llame desde cualquier lugar de la number 311 or 1-866-44SEWER Ciudad de Los Angeles a la lfnea telef6nica ( 1-886-447-3937) . gratuita 311 6 al 1-866-44SEWER (1866- After selecting the language 447-3937). of preference, you will be Despues de seleccionar el idioma de su connected to a live preferencia, se le conectara con un operator. The operator operador, el cual ingresara la then will enter the odor informaci6n de la queja de los malos complaint information into olores en el Formulario de Respuesta a the Odor Complaint Response Form. las Ouejas de Malos Olores. Please have the following ready: Por favor tenga lista la siguiente informaci6n: • Your name • Su nombre • Phone number • Su numero de telefono • When and where you • Cuando y en donde detecto el detected odor mal olor A crew is then dispatched to investigate the Se enviara a un equipo que investigara la queja de odor complaint and necessary action will be los malos olores y se tomaran las medidas taken. If you want the results of the necesarias. Si desea obtener los resultados de la investigation, please indicate that in your investigaci6n, por favor indfquelo en su petici6n y request, and you will receive a call back by a usted recibira una llamada de un representante de representative of the Bureau of Sanitation. la Oficina de Salubridad. As a covered entity under Titl e II of the Americ ans with Disabiliti es Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate on the basis of disability and upon request. will provide Como una entidad cubierta bajo el Titulo II de la Ley de Ame ri canos con Di sca pac idades. la Ciudad reasonable accommodations to ensure equal access to its programs. services and de Los Angeles no discrimina en base a ninguna discapacidad fisica y en el momenta en el que se activities. le sol icite proporciona ra. dentro de lo posible. las arreg los necesari os para asegura r un igual acceso a sus programas. servicios y actividades. Printed on recycled paper. lmpreso en pa pel recic lado

CITY OF LOS ANGELES Department of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation 2714 Media Center Drive 311 oR 1-866-447-3937 www.lasewers.org Los Angeles, CA 90065 TOLL FREE • ENGLISH AND SPANISH * LA LLAMADA ES GRATUITA • INGLES Y ESPANOL •

CITY OF LOS ANGELES Department of Public Works• Bureau of Sanitation 2714 Media Center Drive Los Angeles, CA 90065

To report sewer

odors,, call Reporte los ma/os· olores de/ drenaje 311 or • o 1-866·44SEWER (1·866-447-3937) Toll free•La llamada es gratulta or r;o to • o visite www.1asewers.org

City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation

Report Sewer Odors What happens if some regional disaster, such Air Treatment Facilities (ATF) fl:!:~~d-:!IAire as a major earthquake, disrupts power to the 1.Que pasarra si atgun desastre regional, Air Treatment Facility? como un terremoto, llegara a ofectar Io In the event of equipment malfunction or any other energfo de Io Planta de Tratamiento de Aire? En caso de que el equipo tenga alg(m mal unusual occurrence, an alarm signal will be sent to funcionamiento o suceda alg(m acontecimiento fuera Bureau of Sanitation staff who will respond immediately. de lo normal, se enviara una serial de alarma al In the event of a shut down of the equipment, any air that personal de la Oficina de Salubridad el cual leaves the sewer would come up into the facility and will respondera inmediatamente. En caso de que se still be treated passively (more slowly). paralice el equipo, todo el aire que salga del drenaje pasara por la planta y se tratara de manera pasiva If +he Air Treatment Facility uses common \frnon (mas lentamente). t 10Iogy and solves sewer odor problems, . hasn't the City built any before now? This type of odor control technology is fairly new for Si Ia Planto de Tratamiento del Aire utlllza sewers. The technology has been used at the City.'s 0 303 N. San Fernando Road, LA tecnologfa comun y resuelve Ios problemas sewage treatment plants where large quantities of f) 886 N. Mission Road, LA de Ios molos olores del drenoJe, ipor que Ia odorous air are generated and treated, and staff are Q 633 S. Mission Road, LA Ciudad no habia construido uno antes? Este tipo de tecnologia para el control de malos olores working around the clock. The problem of sewer odors ... 0 2301 San Pedro Street, LA •iii es bastante nuevo para los drenajes. La tecnologia se has been addressed in years past in localized areas with ... Q 3410 S. La Cienega Boulevard, LA • ~=SEWERS ha usado en las plantas de tratamiento de drenaje de specific problems. The City's efforts are expanding now to .. G 6000 Jefferson Boulevard, LA "' Drenajes la Ciudad en donde se generan y tratan grandes become more proactive. • = G 9940 Jefferson Boulevard, Culver City cantidades de alre oloroso. Estas plantas cuentan con personal que trabaja dfa y noche. El problema de los How will the Air Treat~ent Facility be monitored malos olores del drenaje se ha atendido en los ultimas and maintained year after year, even In times tUtiliza qufmicos Ia planta que pueden ser tTrabaJaron tiempo completo Ios trobajadores pellgrosos? anos en areas en donde se han localizado problemas o ited City budgets? en Ia Plonta de Tratamlento del Aire o se Las Plantas de Tratamiento del Aire utilizan bacteria que especificos. Los esfuerzos de la Ciudad se estan onies needed for this service are not taken from operaro a troves de control remoto? se produce naturalmente ·y que se "alimenta" de los Las Plantas de Tratamiento del Aire se operaran y expandiendo de manera que sean de caracter mas the General Fund, which is sensitive to economic olores. Se lleva a cabo mas filtraci6n mediante un carb6n monitorearan a control remoto, llevando a cabo visitas proactivo. conditions. ATF operations and maintenance monies are hecho a base de cascara de coco el cual es similar al peri6dicas de mantenimiento para asegurarse que las allocated from the Sewer Construction and Maintenance carb6n utilizado en los filtros de los acuarios. No se instalaciones esten trabajando a su 6ptima eficiencia. (SCM) fund. The ATFs will receive prioritized funding every utilizara ningun qufmico peligroso. year.

As a covered entity under Title II of 1he Americans with Disabilities f!v;:t, the City of Los Angeles does not Como una entlded cublerta por el Tftulo ll de Ia Ley de Amerlcanos coo Dlscapacldades, Ia Cludad de discriminate on 1he basis of disability and, upon request, will pl'O'llde reasonable accommodation to ensure FOR MORE INFORMATION (866) 711 '1115 Los Angeles no dlscrlmlna en base a nlnguna dlscapacidad flsJca y en el momento en el qua se le equal access to Its programs, services, and activities. PARA MAYOR INFORMACl6N •1 sollclte proporclonan\, dentro de Jo poslble, Ios arreglos nacasarJos para asegurar un Jgual acceso a los programas, servicJos y activldades. IMPRESO EN PAPEL RECICLADO PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER What we're doing about Air Treatment Facilities

1,Por que puedo perciblr ocasionalmente sewe malos olores del drenaJe? Por lo general, los malos olores se quedan dentro del drenaje, pero cuando la tuberfa va demasiado o r Why can I occasionally smell sewage odors? llena y el drenaje cambia su elevaci6n -subterranea lo As part of the City's massive upgrade to its sewer Usually odors remain inside of the sewer, but when the suftciente como para remover el agua,y restringir el system, seven Air Treatment Facilities (ATFs) are pipe runs quite full and/or the sewer slope changes currently being designed and will be built by 2009 to paso de aire de adentro, los malos olores se pueden enough to stir up the water and restrict the air passage escapar al aire del exterior. Los malos olores pueden remove air and treat odors from our sewers and in turn, from your community. Most of the ATFs will be inside, odors can escape through holes in maintenance escaparse del drenaje a traves de los orificios de las constructed along the alignments of the new, state-of hole covers, through roof vents, and other very small tapas de las alcantarillas, a traves de los conductos the-art East Central Interceptor Sewer (ECIS) and North openings in the sewer system. de ventilaci6n del techo y de otras aberturas muy East Interceptor Sewer (NEIS). Interim odor scrubbers will pequefias en la tuberfa. be installed to mitigate potential odors until the permanent ATFs have been built. What does an Air Treatment Facility do? The Air Treatment Facility (ATF) will remove air and treat 1,Que hace una Planta de Tratamlento odors from sewers. del Aire? Lo que estamos haciendo La Planta de Tratamiento del Aire (ATF) eliminara el aire y tratara los malos olores de los drenajes. para eliminar los malos What will the Air Treatment Facility look like? The ATFs will be designed to fit in the neighborhoods in olores del drenaje which they are located, both in their function and 1,C6mo seni una Planta para el Tratamiento Como parte de mejoras masivas que la Ciudad esta llevando a appearance. Each location will be different in appearance. del Aire? cabo en su sistema de drenaje, actualmente se estan disefiando The site features, space availability, and capacity Las Plantas de Tratamiento del Aire se disefiaran de siete Plantas para el Tratamiento del Aire (ATFs, por sus siglas en requirements at each site will all play a role in manera que se adapten a los vecindarios en los que 0 ingles) y se construiran para el afio 2009 con el fin de eliminar el 0 determining the overall design concept for each facil" se localizan, en cuanto a su funcionamiento ya su aire y tratar los malos olores de nuestros desagues, y a su vez, aspecto. Cada sitio sera diferente. Las de su comunidad. La mayorfa de los ATFs se construiran a lo caracterfsticas, la disponibilidad de espacio, los largo de la Red de Drenaje lnterceptora del Este Central (ECIS, Does it use chemicals that can be dangerous? por sus siglas en ingles) y la Red de Drenaje lnterceptora del The ATFs use naturally occurring bacteria that "feed" on requisitos de capacidad en cada planta seran Noreste (NEIS, por sus siglas en ingles) recien construidas con the odors. Further filtering occurs in vessels filled with importantes para determinar el concepto general del una alta y modema tecnologfa. Se instalaran depuradores de carbon that is similar to carbon used in an aquarium filter. disefio de la planta. olores provisionales para mitigar los malos olores potenciales No dangerous chemical will be used. hasta que se hayan construido los ATFs permanentes.

Will people work at the Air Treatment Facility full-time or wlll It be operated remotely? City of Los Angeles The ATFs will be operated and monitored remotely, with BUREAU OF ENGINEERING periodic maintenance visits to make sure that the facilities BUREAU.OF SANITATION are running at optimal efficiency. I a la Comunidad

QUE

El Departamento de ublicas de la Ciudad de Los Angeles (Ciu dad) coloca( instalaci6n provisional de tratamiento de aire (ATF por sus en ingles) en su vecindad. Esta ATF provisional sera ubicada n 1403 North Gardner Street en el sitio de la antigua biblioteca publica de Durant (en la esquina de Gardner Street y DeLongpre Avenue). El ATF eliminara y tratara olores de las alcantarillas dentro y cerca de su COiiiuilidad donde el p1·obiema sea mas severe.

UPDATE: PRIOR TO MAY 15, 2006, THERE WILL BE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION WORK AT 1403 NORTH GARDNER THAT WILL REQUIRE 3 TO 4 DAYS OF ON-SITE EXPLORATORY DIGGING INVOLVING THE USE OF AN AIR COMPRESSOR AND JACK HAMMER. ACTUALIZACION: ANTES DEL 15 DE MAYO DEL 2006 OCURARA CONSTRUCCl6N PRELIMINAR EN CU ANDO 1403 NORTH GARDNER QUE REQUERIRA 3 A 4 DIAS DE PERFORACIONES EXPLORATORIAS CON UN COMPRESOR DE AIRE YUN MARTILLO NEUMATICO.

The temporary ATF is scheduled to be installed and connected to the La instalaci6n y conexi6n del ATF provisional al sistema de alcantarillado local sewer system from May 15 through July 15, 2006. Work will occur local esta programada desde 15 de mayo hasta el 15 de julio del 2006. Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. It may be necessary El trabajo se llevara a cabo de lunes a viernes desde las 8 a.m. hasta for work to occur on one or two Saturdays between the hours of 9:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Podra ser necesario que se trabaje uno o dos sabados entre to 5:30 p.m. Once installed, the temporary unit is estimated to be in opera las horas de 9 a.m. y 5:30 p.m. Despues de ser instalada, se estima que tion from Spring 2006 through Spring 2008. la edificaci6n provisional funcionara desde la primavera del 2006 hasta la primavera del 2008. Street Closures & Restricted Parking: During con struction , a section of De Longpre (between Gardner and Sierra Bonita) Cierres de calles y restricciones de estaciona will be closed for approximately four weeks (estimated to be May 15 miento: Durante la construcci6n , una parte de DeLongpre Avenue through June 15, 2006). Driveway access should not be affected during (entre Gardner y Sierra Bonita) sera cerrada por aproximadamente cu this period; however 2 to 3 parking spaces on the street will not be avail atro semanas (se estima que sea entre el 15 de julio del 2006) . No se able. Also, there will be intermittent street closures on Gardner from May afectara el acceso a caminos de entrada durante este periodo; sin em 15 through July 15, 2006 . bargo dos a treis espacios de estacionamiento en la calle no estaran dis ponibles . Tambien habra cierres intermitentes de Gardner desde el 15 de Project Background: Usually odors remain inside the City's mayo haste el 15 de julio del 2006, durante el periodo de construcci6n. sewers, but when a sewer pipe runs quite fuii andior ihe sewer siope changes enough to stir up the water and restrict the air passage inside Antecedentes del proyecto: Tipicamente olores se man the pipe , odors can escape through holes in maintenance hole covers, tienen dentro de las alcantarillas de la Ciudad , pero a la vez que una through roof vents and other very small openings in the sewer system. tuberia este llena y/o la pendiente cambia a niveles que se remueve el To address these types of sewer odors in your neighborhood, the City agua y restringe el paso de aire dentro de la tuberia, las olores se es will install the temporary ATF, which will include an "air scrubber" system . capan por los hoyos en las portadas de las hoyos de mantenimiento, por This scrubber system includes a carbon filter that will remove and treat conducto de ventilaci6n en el techo y otras aberturas muy pequef\as en the odors before they are released into the atmosphere. el sistema de alcantarilla. Para resolver estos tipos de olores en su vecin dad, la Ciudad instalara ATFs provisionales que incluiran un sistema de Once the temporary ATF is installed, the City will monitor and evaluate its limpieza de aire ("air scrubber"). Este sistema de limpieza incluye un effectiveness to determine if a permanent ATF is needed. If a permanent filtro de carbon que removera y tratara los olores antes de que alcancen ATF is necessary, the City will work closely throughout the process with el ambiente. you and other neighbors and businesses regarding the location of the ATF and how it would look. A la vez que se instale el ATF provisional, la Cuidad monitoreara y evalu ara su eficaz para determinar si se necesita un ATF permanente. Si un ATF permanente es necesario, la Cuidad trabajara estrechamente con Ud . y otros vecinos y negocios durante el proceso sobre la ubicaci6n del TELEPHONE ATF y como sera. TELEFONO 323.342.6249 323.342.6249 For more inform Para mas informaci6n please call: p~ favor llame al telefono: 323.342.624 323.342.6249 The City of Los Angeles Dep Public Works will install a te Air Treatment Facility (ATF) i community beginning Spring

Thank you for your patience as t City installs this facility that serve Gracias por su paciencia mientras la your neighborhood. Ciudad instala esta unidad que les servira a su vecindad.

99006 e1UJO!!ll!J 'sa1aBu\l so1 ms~ 8AIJO J8jU8J e!pa~ v~a uo!1e11ues JO neaJn9 S)IJOM O!lqnd JO 1uaw1Jedaa sa1aBu\l so1 JO Al!J

·sapep1A1pe /.. sop1AJas 'seweJ6oJd soi e os,me 1en61 un JeJn6ase eJed soµesa:iau so16aJJe soi 'a1q1sod 01 ap o.11uap 'eJeuo10JodoJd a1p11os a1 as anb 1a ua 01uawow 1a ua /.. ~!SJJ pepped~S!P eun6u1u e aseq ua eu1wuos1p ou sa1a6uv soi ap pep in:) a1 'sapeppedeos10 uoo sou~pawv ap f..a1 e1 ap ( ( OITll!l la Jod 1!1Ja1qno pep11ua eun OUJO:) ·samAnoe pue 'saO!MlS 'sweJ6oJd SI! 01 ssa:ioe 1enba aJnsua 01 uo~ -epowwoooe a1qeuoseaJ ap1A0Jd IIIM '1sanbaJ uodn 'pue f..t!llqes1p JO s1seq a41 uo a1eu1wuos1p 1ou saop sa1a6uv so110 At!:) a~1 'Pv' sam11qes10 4l!M su~µawv a41 JO ( ( ap11 Japun f..t~ua paJaAoo e sv

sa1a6u\l so1 ap pepn!:) e1 ap se::i!lq~d seJqQ ap 01uawe)Jedaa 1ap pep,ues ap eupro e1 Jed opez!leaJ sepe11unwo:> seJofaw ap 01:>aAOJd UO!JBJ!UBS JO neams S)IJOM O!lqnd JO 1uaw)Jedaa sa1a6u\l so1 Jo Al!:) AQ t:>9[0Jd tU9W9AOJdw1 At!UnWWO:) Sewer Odor Control Facilities

t-·. I NOS

Status: Under Study Start Date: 7129104

Sierra Bonita TEMPORARY CARBON SCRUBBER Status: Under Construction Estimated Start: : 8/1/2006

LCIS WHIS NEIS-Humboldt SCRUBBER THEN ATF Interim Start: 5/06 Estimated ATF Start: 3/26/09

Beverly Hills NEIS-Richmond INTERIM SCRUBBER/FUTURE ATF Interim Start: 5/06 Estimated ATF Start: 3/26/09

Genesee MLK!Rodeo ECIS-Mission & Jesse TEMPORARY CARBON SCRUBBER MAZE IV CONSTRUCTION SCRUBBER INTERIM SCRUBBER/FUTURE ATF Status: TBD Pending Review Interim Start: 8/27/04 Start Date: 4/15/04 ATF Estimated Start: 5/23/08

NOS ECIS-Jefferson & La Cienega /' INTERIM SCRUBBER/FUTURE ATF Interim Start: 8/26/04 A TF Estimated Start: 5/23/08

ECIS-Jefferson & Rodeo , INTERIM SCRUBBER/FUTURE ATF Interim Start: 7/20/04 ATF Estimated Start: 5/23/08

·51 ECJS-NORS Connection INTERIM SCRUBBER/FUTURE ATF Interim Start: Pending electricity ATF Estimated Start: TBD I Sewer Odor Control Facilities • Air Treatment Facility (ATF) No. Name Type Size(cfm) Cost($M) Existing Scrubber Interim Carbon Scrubber/ G) NEIS - Humboldt 10,000 0.4 then Future ATF 13,260 6.6 • Scrubber Under Construction Interim Carbon Scrubber/ G) NEIS - Richmond 10,000 0.4 then Future ATF 8 600 5.4 --- Outfalls Interim Carbon Scrubber/ G) ECIS • Mission & Jesse 10,000 0.2 then Future ATF 12000 4.9 Freeway Interim Carbon Scrubber/ G) ECIS - 23rd & San Pedro 10,000 0.2 then Future A TF 13,900 6.3 ~ Los Angeles City Interim Carbon Scrubber/ ECIS - Jefferson/La Cienega 10,000 0.3 G) then Future ATF 20,000 8.3 LJ Outside Los Angeles City Interim Carbon Scrubber/ G) ECIS-Jefferson & Roceo 10,000 0.3 then Future ATF 12 000 8.0 Interim Carbon Scrubber/ ECIS-NORS Connection 10,000 0.3 (j) then Future ATF 12,000 6.6 Definitions: TEMPORARY: Location under study for ATF G) NORS Carbon Scrubber 10 000 0.2 INTERIM: Future ATF G) Radford & Woocbridge Carbon Scrubber 5 000 0.3

@) Dacotah Pumping Plant Carbon Scrubber under Construction 3 000 0.5 Wastewater Engineering Services Division Bureau of Sanitation G Ba llona Pumping Plant Carbon Scrubber 5 000 0.5 City of Los Angeles • IO I~ SANITATION @ MLK & Roceo Carbon Scrubber • r ~ & • t • I • t • • 5 000 O&M 0 1,4002,800 5,600 8, 400 11,200 PUBLIC WOllKS m:::::11c:::i---==:::::1--•Feet Created 6/21/06 @ Genesee Siphon Carbon Scrubber 5000 0.3 S:\users\Odor MP INFO\Scrubber_ATFmapBsize2.mxd @ Sierra Bonita Gamon Scrubber in Pre-Design 10000 0.6 Thomas Bros Data reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS MAP City of •Los Angeles C::ITV 01'• I.OS AN

Community Feedback Survey

The City of Los Angeles has recently implemented a program to manage and treat sewer-related odors. The City requests your assistance by completing the following survey to help us evaluate our Odor Control Program. Please fill out the survey and mail or fax back to : Clarissa Filgioun The Robert Group 3108 Los Feliz Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90039 fax 323-669-9800

1. Do you notice sewer odors in your community? Yes O No O If yes, how frequently do you detect these odors?

2. On a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the worst, how would you rate the intensity of the odors? 10 20 30 40 so 3. Have you noticed a decrease in sewer odors in your community over the last 4 years? Yes O No O If yes, has the decrease been significant or minor? Significant D Minor O If no, have the odors gotten any worse? Yes O No O 4. What is your experience, if any, with the City's odor reporting hotline?

5. Do you have any suggestions to improve the odor reporting hotline system?

Street Address:

The City of Los Angeles appre:-iates your time and feedback, and looks forwar~ to continuing to work with you on this important program.

If you have any questions about the odor hotline, please call Scott Hare at 323.342.6231 If you have any questions about this survey, please call Clarissa Filgioun at 323.669.9500

Thank you. _;ITV OF Los ANGELE'- BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS

COMMISSIONERS BUREAU OF SANITATION

RITA L. ROBINSON CYNTHIA M. RUIZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT JOSEPH E. MUNDINE DAVID SICKLER EXECUTIVE OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA VAROUJ S. ABKIAN PAULA A. DANIELS TRACI J. MINAMIDE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE MAYOR ENRIQUE C. ZALDIVAR ASSISTANT DIRECTORS

YOLANDA FUENTES 1 1149 S. BROADWAY, 9 " FLOOR VALERIE LYNNE SHAW Los ANGELES, CA 90015 TEL: (213) 485-2210 May 8, 2006 FAX: (213) 485-2979

Honorable Jan Perry, Chair Honorable Energy & The Environment Committee Members c/o Frank Martinez, City Clerk Room 395, City Hall

Dear Councilmember Perry:

RE: Odor Control Report related to CF-03-0153-82

The Collection System Settlement Agreement requires the City to submit an annual progress report. The Bureau of Sanitation presented this report to your Committee in February (CF-03-0153-S2) and at that time you expressed concerns over sewer odors and asked for additional information. Enclosed for your Committee's review is a report summarizing Sanitation's efforts over the past several years to reduce sewer odors throughout the City.

If you have any questions or require additional information please contact Adel Hagekhalil of my staff at (323) 342-6225.

Sincerely, ~~ RITA L ROBINSON, Director Bureau of Sanitation

RLR:AHH:BUtn

CSSA Annual Report to EQ (TN.Folder) H:RLR153.CR

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT

AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER ~~!u~,.ii?.20~ r,: r= .. :·, : - JL.-' - r T\f r, .-,- I' • :- • -::::1 cE J. I L ·1, I

" ? 3 r. r1 8: 5 I

• BUREAU OF SANITATION ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM

Background All sewers generate a rotten egg-odor caused by hydrogen sulfide, H2S, which is produced by bacteria in the sewage. Significant amounts of H2S gas are produced where sewers bend, change slope, constrict, and pass thru junction and drop structures. This gas can escape from the sewer system through maintenance holes (MHs) and sewer laterals in areas with high sewer gas pressure. The pressure usually increases as the sewer levels rise each day. Large sewers with high flows are particularly susceptible to odor problems caused by the release of H2S gas. Sewer odors are being controlled by limiting the production of this gas and/or preventing it from escaping from the sewer using a combined approach as discussed herein.

Odor Complaint Response and Investigation The Bureau receives sewer odor complaints from various sources including a 24-hour operator-assisted hotline, through the City's website, or the 311 phone number. Field crews investigate and identify the source of the odors and, if sewer related, the crews seal the MH and take other corrective actions when possible. Hotline complaints are followed up within 7 days to inform the complainant of the investigation, corrective actions and to get additional information. Complicated problems are referred to engineers who review the field investigations and sewer design and perform field tests to develop plans to reduce or eliminate the odors. Solutions include moderate repairs, large capital improvement projects, hydraulic relief projects, air treatment facilities, or chemical addition systems.

Routine Sewer Maintenance Obstructions in the sewer slow the sewage flow and cause debris to settle promoting the generation of hydrogen sulfide. Preventative maintenance includes sewer cleaning, root control, trap inspection/maintenance, and sealing sewer MHs or other access structures to prevent the release of foul odors. An aggressive cleaning program cleans each sewer at least once every five years and more frequently in known "hot spot" areas. Approximately 2800 miles are cleaned annually. Approximately 400 miles of root-infested sewers are treated each year with chemicals to clear roots that contribute to debris settlement.

Trap MHs are used to block sewer gases and are typically located where small sewers connect to larger outfalls or interceptor sewers, which tend to have high pressures and high H2S concentrations. New trap MHs have been added to hotspot areas and all trap MHs are now inspected and cleaned on a quarterly basis.

The City has a number of sewer siphons that pass under obstructions such as rivers and large storm drains. These siphons remain full, even with small flows, causing sewage to move very slowly depositing debris that promote H2S generation. To prevent this, siphons are now cleaned quarterly. An air duct called an "air jumper" conveys airflow past a siphon so sewer gasses can travel downstream with the sewage and not buildup pressure as shown below. Our research indicates condensate can fill these jumpers and diminish their effectiveness so they are now inspected on a regular basis to insure they remain clear. Chemical Addition The Bureau started using odor control chemicals in 1997 after extensive analysis was done on complaint history, sewer plans, structures, siphons, and the chemistry of the wastewater. Problem areas were identified and trial applications were conducted to gauge effectiveness and fine-tune the application. Sodium hydroxide is currently applied upstream of the Maze system to control odors in the South LA area. It is added to sewage through MHs upstream of this area one to three times per week, depending on the temperature and time of year, to reduces odors for 3-5 days by elevating the pH of the sewage thereby killing odor-producing bacteria

A second treatment, using magnesium hydroxide, was started in September 2003 and it also raises the pH of sewage to kill bacteria and reduce odors. It is injected continuously at the Union Pacific Pump Plant in Boyle Heights. Another facility for treating the south branch of the Maze sewer system is under design. The following map shows the areas currently receiving chemical treatment in South LA.

9''1"! .,.. ...,.. -.,..1 1 ___".W,1!_ __ _

·+ ....

Magnesium hydroxide treatment was recently expanded to treat odors downstream of the Tillman Water Reclamation Plant after a successful pilot indicated it is effective in treating odors in the North Outfall Sewer and in the La Coinage San Fernando Relief Sewer. This application has reduced sewer odors around Studio City and Hollywood. Sewer Construction and Repair The Bureau has relieved full running sewers that are experiencing chronic odor problems with new sewers to provide additional capacity and lower sewer gas pressure. The East Central Interceptor Sewer (ECIS) reduced air pressure and odors in the NOS. A similar relief project is being designed to reduce air pressure within the Maze South Branch.

Air Treatment In 2001, extensive monitoring and testing was done to pinpoint the high sewer pressure areas in large sewers located near La Cienaga, Jefferson and Rodeo. Three Air Treatment Facilities (ATFs) were planned and will begin construction to discharge treated sewer gas and relieve the associated sewer gas pressure. Interim carbon scrubbers are being used at these locations until the ATFs are completed. They have been performing satisfactorily although some initial problems occurred on how often the carbon needed to be changed.

Additional ATFs were also planned for four locations on the recently completed ECIS and NEIS sewers in anticipation of higher sewer gas pressure. The locations are: 23rd and San Pedro, Mission and Jesse, Humboldt and Ave 20 and Mission and Richmond. Interim scrubbers were installed but subsequent operating experience indicates that not all locations require air treatment and are being re-evaluated. Carbon scrubbers have also been installed at several more locations throughout the City at other odor hotspots. The following is a list of thirteen carbon scrubbers currently being used or planned.

Sewer Odor Control

Location - Current System Type Size Facilities (cfm) Mission & Jesse ECIS Carbon 10,000 23ra & San Pedro ECIS Carbon 10,000 Jefferson & La Cienega ECIS Carbon 10,000 Jefferson & Rodeo NCOS Carbon 10,000 North Outfall Treatment Fae WLAIS Carbon 10,000 MLK& Rodeo Maze Carbon 5,000 Radford & Woodbridge NOS Carbon 5,000 Ballona Pump Plant Marina Carbon 5,000 Genesee & Venice LCSFVRS Carbon 5,000 Humboldt ECIS Carbon 10,000 NORS Portal NORS Carbon 10,000 Richmond ECIS Carbon 10,000 Dakotah Pump Plant BHASS Carbon 3,000

Under Construction System Type Size (cfm)

Sierra Bonita LCSFVRS Carbon 10,000 Monitoring Monitoring stations have been established to identify the cause of sewer odors at known odor hot spots, outfall and interceptor sewers, known pressure zones, areas of turbulence, sharp slope changes in sewer pipes (grade breaks), and sewer pipes with long detention times such as flat sewers. The stations evaluate wastewater chemistry, temperature, H2S concentrations, and air pressure. Monitoring is conducted at least semi-annually at designated points to gage the seasonal variation in odor generation and to monitor the adequacy and effectiveness of any chemical treatment. These results are being used to develop an Odor Master Plan expected to be completed by October 2006.

Conclusion

The Bureau has created an effective odor-control program by employing coordinated measures that address the many causes of sewer odors. The odor complaint hotline allows for a quicker response and resolution of odor complaints. The application of odor control chemicals has reduced hydrogen sulfide concentration in targeted sewers by up to 90%. The use of air scrubbers has reduced sewer pressures and the venting gasses. The construction of relief sewers has reduced the high air pressures occurring in overloaded pipes. The on-going repair of trap MHs and the construction of local sewers have alleviated the movement of odors from large-diameter sewers into neighborhoods, and the maintenance program has decreased the potential for septic conditions. As a result, odor complaints have fallen significantly in the targeted areas. While it is impossible to completely eliminate sewer odors, the Bureau has and will continue to mitigate odors through monitoring, complaint response, and effective implementation of odor control technologies.

One major element of this program, the ATF element is currently under review and the Bureau will report its finding on this element within the next couple of months. ANGELI FRANK T. MARTINEZ rv OF LOS Office of the City Clerk CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK Council a:nd Public Services KAREN E. KALFAYAN Room 395, City Hall Executive Officer Los Angeles, CA 90012 Council File Information - (213) 978-1044 General Information - (213) 978-1133 When making inquiries Fax: (213) 978-1040 relative to this matter refer to File No. CLAUDIA M- DUNN ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA Chief, Council and Public Services Division MAYOR

03-0153-82

April 7, 2006

All Councilmembers Chief Legislative Analyst Board of Public Works Bureau of Sanitation

RE: NOTE AND FILE THE BOARD OF PUBLIC. WORKS REPORT RELATIVE TO COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2005

At the meeting of the Council held April 5, 2006, the following action was taken:

Attached report adopted ...... ------Attached motion (-) adopted ...... ______Attached resolution adopted ...... ______FORTHWITH ...... ------Mayor concurred ...... ______To the Mayor FORTHWITH ...... ------Mot ion adopted to approve communication recommendation(s) ...... X Motion adopted to approve committee report recommendation(s) ... ______Ordinance adopted ...... ------Ordinance number ...... ______Publication date ...... ______Effective date ...... ______

City Clerk er

~ 4o i11\,{"' AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER COMMUNICATION

TO: LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL File No. 03-0153-82

FROM: COUNCILMEMBER JAN PERRY, CHAIR COUNICLMEMBER ALEX PADILLA, MEMBER ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

Public Comments

COMMUNICATION FROM CHAIR and MEMBER, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE relative to the Collection System Settlement Agreement first annual report for the period ending June 30, 2005.

Recommendation for Council action:

NOTE and FILE the Board of Public Works (BPW) report relative to the Collection System Settlement Agreement first annual report for the period ending June 30, 2005, inasmuch as the report was submitted for information only and no Council action is necessary.

Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

Summary:

In a report dated January 6, 2006, the BPW notes that after February 1998, the wettest February in Los Angeles history, sewer overflows occurred in a number of areas throughout the City. As a result, the Santa Monica Baykeeper (Baykeeper) filed a Federal lawsuit asking for injunctive relief and $549 million in penalties due to the spills. In January 2001, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and a number of community groups representing residents in South Los Angeles joined the Baykeeper in the lawsuit against the City. The plaintiffs alleged that the City had too many dry weather overflows and odor problems and sought a consent decree that would govern the management, operation, and maintenance of the wastewater collection system.

The BPWalso reports that following the filing of the lawsuit against the City, the parties continued to work towards a settlement while the City continued to make extensive improvements to the collection system through implementation of capital improvement projects and requisite operation and maintenance programs. The parties reached a Collection System Settlement Agreement on August 6, 2004. The agreement requires the City to submit annual progress reports by October 1, 2005 detailing its progress for Fiscal Year 2004-05 and by September 1 for subsequent years for the next nine years.

In an overview of the annual report, the Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering, and Sanitation noted that the City met and exceeded the requirements of the settlement agreement. Also, a majority of the required projects have been completed ahead of schedule. Furthermore, sanitary sewer overflows are declining. The annual report provides a brief summary of compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement on the following:

• Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects • Rehabilitation and Replacement - Mileage Requirements . '

• Sewer Relief Projects • Capacity Exceptions List • Wastewater Capital Improvements

The annual report also includes the following in its summary of the City's current 10-year capital improvement expenditure plan:

Sewer Cleaning Sewer Line Television Assessment - Mileage and Condition Ratings Fats, Oils and Grease Control Program Primary and Secondary Basin Plans Hydraulic Model of Urban Sewer Evaluation Chemical Root Control Settlement Agreement Implementation Failure to Comply Projects

At a regular meeting held on March 1, 2006, representatives from the Bureau of Sanitation gave a presentation on the first annual report for the Collection System Settlement Agreement to the Energy and Environment Committee. After a brief discussion, the Committee moved to note and file the first annual report for the Collection System Settlement Agreement inasmuch as the report was submitted for information only and no Council action is necessary. This matter is now forwarded to the Council for its consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

JAN PERRY, Chair Energy and Environment Committee

ALEX PADILLA, Member Energy and Environment Committee

MEMBER VOTE PERRY: YES GARCETTI: ABSENT GREUEL: ABSENT LABONGE: ABSENT PADILLA: YES

SG 3/14/06 #030153.2.wpd COUNCIL VOTE Apr 5, 2006 10:13:40 AM, #5 Items for Which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - Items 44-74 Voting on Item(s): 44-51,53-74 Roll Call CARDENAS Yes GREUEL Yes HAHN Yes HUIZAR Absent LABONGE Yes PADILLA Yes PARKS Yes PERRY Yes REYES Yes ROSENDAHL Yes SMITH Yes WEISS Absent WESSON Absent ZINE Yes *GARCETTI Yes Present: 12, Yes: 12 No: 0 ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Report/Communication for Signature Council File Number: 03-0(53-SZ- Committee Meeting Dat;;1i5!' / D(a Council Date: '1 '6fl __

COMMITTEE MEMBER YES NO ABSENT Councilmember Perry, Chair v Councilmember Garcetti ~ Councilmember Greuel ~ Councilmember La.Bonge ~ Councilmember Padilla

Remarks Altfkdr 57u!

Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant ------Telephone 978-1072 ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUGGESTED NOTIFICATION OF COUNCIL ACTION

Council File No. D?-D[ 5~S2- ~ncil Member(sl~+J\~l~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[]Mayor (with I without file)

[]City Attorney I City Attorney w/ Blue Sheet

[]City Administrative Officer

~f Legislative Analyst

[]Controller

[]Board of Water and Power Commissioners

[]Department of Water and Power

~d of Public Works

~eau of Sanitation

[]Department of Environmental Affairs

[]Environmental Affairs Commission

[]South Coast Air Quality Management District

[]State Solid Waste Management Board

[]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ []~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CITY OF Los ANGELES BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE MEMBERS BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 200 N. Spring SI .. Rm. 355, City Holl CYNTHIA M. RUIZ LOS ANGELES. CA 90012 PRESIDENT DAVID SICKLER JAMES A GIBSON VICE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAULA A. DANIELS PRESIDENT PRO-TEMPORE GENERAL INFORMATION YOLANDA FUENTES (213) 978-0261 COMMISSIONER ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA FAX: (213) 978-0278 MAYOR VALEIIJE LYNNE SHAW TDD: (213) 978-2310 COMMISSIONER

January 6, 2006

#1 SAN/CON AD/CE

City Council Room 395, CH

Subject: COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST ANNUAL REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2005

Please find attached for information only, a report of the Bureaus of Sanitation, Contract Administration and Engineering, adopted by the Board of Public Works on January 6, 2006 providing the collection system settlement agreement first annual report for the period ending June 30, 2005.

Respectfully submitted, ~~,~~ James A. Gibson Executive Officer Board of Public Works

JAG:cg

JAN 1120(15 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & WASTE MANAGEMENT

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY -AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 11=:('1-J\,'.-; 11.... \ /, __ ' l ·1~, './ ,..., : · ,-1,'"'r: C, 1 1' - .... ,.,c

;:T '. .J~N I I Ni IQ: 29 I . '

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

BUREAU OF SANITATION BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF ENGINEERING JOINT BOARD REPORT NO. 1 JANUARY 6, 2006

CD: ALL

COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST ANNUAL REPORT FOR. PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30. 2005 (CF# 03-0153)

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt and forward to the City Council

TRANSMITTAL

Copy of the Collection System Settlement Agreement Annual Report No. 1 Dated September 30, 2005.

DISCUSSION

Background

After February 1998, the wettest February in Los Angeles' history, sewer overflows occurred in a number of areas throughout the City. As a result, the Santa Monica Baykeeper (Baykeeper) filed a Federal lawsuit asking for injunctive relief and $549 million in penalties due to the spills. In January 2001, the EPA, the LARWQCB, and a number of community groups representing residents in South Los Angeles joined the Baykeeper in the lawsuit against the City. The plaintiffs alleged that the City had too many dry weather overflows and odor problems and sought a consent decree that would govern the management, operation, and maintenance of the wastewater collection system.

Following the filing of the lawsuit, the parties continued to work towards a settlement while the City continued to make extensive improvements to the . collection system through implementation of capital improvement projects and requisite operation and maintenance programs. Following lengthy legal discoveries and negotiations, the parties reached a Collection System Settlement Agreement (Agreement) on August 6, 2004. The City Council authorized the settlement on June 28, 2004. The Agreement was signed by all parties and was entered by the court on October 29, 2004.

The Agreement requires that the City submit annual progress reports by October 1, 2005 detailing its progress during fiscal year 2004-05 and by September 1 of subsequent years to report progress during the next nine Fiscal Years. The report transmitted herewith dated September 30, 2005 is Annual Report No. 1 and covers the year ending on June 30, 2005. The content and structure of this Report are based on the reqµirements set forth in Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the I ' .

BUREAU OF SANITATION BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF ENGINEERING JOINT BOARD REPORT NO. 1 JANUARY 6, 2006

PAGE2

Agreement. The Annual Report's sections appear in the same alphabetical order ("a" through "n") used in Section VI-G of the Agreement and continue with additional sections ("o" through ."r") in response to Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the Settlement Agreement.

An Overview of the Annual Report No. 1

The Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering, and Sanitation are pleased to report that the City met, and in many cases, exceeded the requirements of the Settlement Agreement as outlined in the Annual Report (Transmittal). The great majority.of.required .projects have been completed ahead of the scheduled dates. Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) are steadily declining. The overall SSOs in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004-05 were approximately 45 percent less than those of the baseline FY of 2000-01. It is noteworthy that spills continued to decline even with the City's recent second wettest season on record. Over the last two years, as a result of a focused chemical root control and sewer cleaning activities, root-caused SSOs have been reduced by 53 percent. SSOs caused by fats, oils, and grease (FOG) were reduced by 79 percent since the inception of the FOG control program in Fiscal Year 2000-01.

The following is a list of the Annual Report sections and provides a brief summary of compliance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement: a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects: Twenty-six of the 55 projects required by the Settlement Agreement for the first three years have been completed, most of them ahead of the schedules set forth in the Agreement.

b. Rehabilitation and Replacement - Mileage Requirements: This provision applies to Years Four through Ten of the Settlement Agreement.

c. Sewer Relief Projects: The Settlement Agreement requires construction of ten sewer relief projects during the first three years. The two largest of these projects, the East Central Interceptor Sewer and Northeast Interceptor Sewer, have been completed.

d. Capacity Exceptions List: As required, the sewers flowing at depth greater than 75 percent of the pipe diameter during peak dry weather flow (PDWF) are listed, along with the City's planned action for these locations. Also listed are the sewers with PDWF depth exceeding 50 percent but less than or equal to 75 percent of the pipe diameter. Many of these locations are already included in our ongoing planning and capacity assurance efforts.

e. Wastewater Capital Improvement$: The City expended $225 million in wastewater capital improvements in FY 2004-05, of which $130 million (58 percent) was spent for the collection system. For FY 2005-06, the projected total wastewater capital improvement expenditure is $280 million with $160 million (57 percent) designated for the collection BUREAU OF SANITATION BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF ENGINEERING JOINT BOARD REPORT NO. 1 JANUARY 6, 2006

PAGE3

system. Attachment "A" to the Annual Report is a summary of the City's current 10-year capital improvement expenditure plan. f. Sewer Cleaning: The City continues to implement its sewer-cleaning program, including hot spot cleaning. The City cleaned 82,000 pipes in FY 2004-05, 36 percent more than the 60,000 pipes required by the Settlement Agreement. In addition, quality assurance and follow-up inspection programs continue to ensure the effectiveness of cleaning operations. g. Sewer Line Television Assessment - Mileage: Using Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) technology and utilizing both City crews and contractors, the City assessed the structural and maintenance conditions of 821 miles of sewer lines, 36 percent beyond the 600 miles required by the Settlement Agreement. h. Sewer Line Television Assessment - Condition Ratings: The sewer line condition assessment for the 821 miles inspected by CCTV indicates that 87 percent of the sewers assessed are in good to excellent condition. i. Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Control Program: All permitted food service establishments (FSEs) have been inspected at least once as part of the City's FOG Control Program. j. Primary and Secondary Basin Plans: Primary sewers are the ones 18 inches or more in diameter. Secondary sewers are the smaller sewers. The City has made excellent progress on the development of its primary and secondary sewer master plans. Eight Primary Basin Plans are schedul.ed for completion by July 2006, and all 25 are scheduled for completion by March 2009. A total of nine Secondary Basin Plans have been completed to date, and twelve more are scheduled for completion by July 2006. k. Hydraulic Model of Urban Sewer Evaluation (MOUSE): The City has completed the development of the sewer pipes friction factors for the basins within the MOUSE predictive model. A pipe's friction factor is one of the parameters used in the calculation of the pipe's sewage flow rate.

I. Chemical Root Control: During FY 2004-05, 474 miles of root-infested sewers were chemically treated, far in excess of the Settlement Agreement requirement of 150 miles. This has resulted in significant reduction in root-caused sewer overflows, as indicated by the 53 percent reduction in root-related sewer overflows since program inception in FY 2002-03.

PAGE4

contribute to the sustained success of this program. The formation of the Settlement Agreement Committee; organizational changes; and improved planning, design, and operation and maintenance processes will provide further support to and focus on the Settlement Agreement compliance program. n. Failure to Comply Projects: The City has complied with all requirements of the Settlement Agreement to date.

The following is additional information on topics outside of those required by Section VI-G of the Settlement Agreement:

o. Odor Outreach in Accordance with Paragraph 36 of the Settlement Agreement: The City has implemented all of the required odor control and response modifications. The City's sewer odor hotline is in place and odor response measures, including chemical addition, are being employed. Odor control activities are routinely reported to the community Odor Advisory Board.

p. Odor Control Facilities per Paragraph 53: During this reporting period, four interim odor scrubbers were placed in operation. Two additional scrubbers under construction are 70 percent complete. Permanent air treatment facilities are in design.

q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program per Paragraph 57: Recommendations from the independent odor control consultant are being implemented.

r. Supplemental Environmental Projects per Paragraph 94: Status reports for the required Supplemental Environmental Projects are included in the Annual Report. Attachment "c· to the Annual Report is a draft work plan for the North Atwater Creek Restoration Project that which has been submitted to the LARWQCB for their review.

The Bureaus -of Contract Administration, Engineering, and Sanitation respectfully submit this report to the Board for its review with a recommendation to adopt and forward it to the City Council.

{ AH VA CS RTH )

Respectfully submitted, BUREAU OF SANITATION BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF ENGINEERING JOINT BOARD REPORT NO. 1 JANUARY 6, 2006

PAGES

L. REAMER, JR. 1~1i::o11tor of Public Works. Bureau of Contract Administration ti:ctlMfo:e~ City Engineer

Prepared by: Farsheed Farhang, WESD Phone: (323) 342-6223 Email: [email protected] CITY OF LOS ANGELES COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT First Annual Report FY 2004/05 '' Win- in uc e s to '' Renewing our sewer infrastructure / P-r-otecting the envir Fnent

6'> 44 E Enhancing the quality of life JeWi ff· - in our neighborhoods

... to protect public health and the environment Lawsuit/Settlement t · .>·.a-, Background

• As a result of 1998 • Settlement El Nino Storms & reached in sewer overflows August 2004 • Filed in 1998 by • Entered by Santa Monica Court on Baykeepers. October 29, • Joined in 2001 by 2004. US EPA, RWQCB and Citizen groups from South LA

... to protect public health and the environment

Settlement Agreement •~ Objectives • Resolve litigation. • Set out program for sewer cleaning, upgrades and repairs. • Reduce sewer overflows. • Reduce sewer odors. ~·-

... to protect public health and the environment

1 Settlement Agreement ···-.. Implementation

• Assigned highest priority

...... "c------. • Obtained necessary !:~ · resources -~ -- ·-M• .. ••11•uo• ·~~- • Established regular coordination and oversight

.. . to protect public health and the environment

Settlement Agreement (f@Implementation • Implemented ~~ organizational Changes

_"==- • Outreached to community • Reached out and coordinated with sewer contractors

... to protect public health and the environment

2 A Year After

• Full Compliance. • Exceeded requirements. • All required sewer projects were completed. • All re~uired odor control measures ~ were implemented. ~ • All sewer maintenance requirements were met. __ • Sewers spills & odors on steady decline. • Work on SEPs progressing well. ... to protect public health and the environment

fi) Sewer Maintenance

00,IX>l • Exceeded 82.0ll requirements. "'·"'" - • Cleaned 82,030 IU.IX>l sewer pipe reaches "'"'" (3,700 miles). 50.IX>l • Cleaned 60,873 hot 40.000 ll.lX>l ~ spot pipes. on e >J.IX>l ~t:Elli:mil 10,00J

Total No. of Pipe Reaches Cleaned No. of Hot Spot Pipes Cleaned

... to protect public health and the environment

3 ... to protect public health and the environment

Fats, Oils and Grease Control Program Outreach & Education

.. . to protect public health and the environment

4 Fats, Oils and Grease f'@ Control Program • Inspected 1OOo/o of all 7,832 permitted FSEs. • Conducted a total of 15,002 FSE inspections. • Issued 944 NOVs e::,~ • Forwarded 462 cases fotlflllr ...-~Bfll,ll:l• oniii enforcement. ~ • Reviewed program and

t,llef#"' ...... proposed enhancemen

.. . to protect public health and the environment

~ Root Control Program • IOutreach I Cit rof lm Angelt'S Dt>p.111111t>11l ol 1reePublic Works ~~ . Sanih1ry I Sewer r:i lines Sewer Cleaning

... to protect public health and the environment

1 (f@ Sewer Maintenance

• Exceeded requirements. Root Control • Treated 474 miles "'i------<114-- -l of root-infested ·~ sewers. 320 miles"' - more than .l .

requirement. 0£"'2'0 - ~----1 .!!.. :m :E "' 00

.. . to protect public health and the environment

Sewer Condition @ Assessment · r------====::::::::= 1Dlj---- • Exceeded "" --- requirements ii. ID) - ---- "" a:: !n) _ • Televised and ] .,, ~ assessed 821 ~.,, _ - H miles, 221 miles 1° more the 600 100

miles required. 4'.Xl ~-~les.of-5ewec..Eipe.Assessed __'

• 87°/o of sewer "" t-----1 inspected are in m t-----1 good to ""1------..j excel lent 2'.ll t---- -1 condition "" t---,,-0 ------1

A B C D E .. . to protect public health and the environment QrdtigJ l}ltincp

2 . Sewer Odor Control I ' • Continue to operate hotline and work with Odor Advisory Board. • Investigated and responded to 569 odor complainst with

only 18% caused by sewers. To report sewer odors can • Developed and implemnted outreach plan to advertise hotline Citywide. 3:il. ,, • 1·866·44SEWER (1·466~447-3937) lcil tr~ • lO 'lr.rn'"hlo ~Q1<:1"1.fto w~J;,~0e:;;';·; o,g

____,. , .. to protect public health and the environment

. Sewer Odor Control ' G' • Continue with proactive odor monitoring and assessment. • Continue with chemical addition to control odors. • Installed 4 new odor scrubbers ( 8 are in operation) with 2 near completion. • 7 permanent sate of the art 'f'W#• - Air treatment facilities are in design.

, .. to protect public health and the environment

3 (fj) Sewer Planning

• Completed the Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) .

. .. to protect public health and the environment

Capital (I'} Improvements • Expended $130 million for collection system capital improvements. • Plan to expend $160 million on collection system capital improvements in FY 2005/06. Capital Improvement 14% · Systemwile\ S8% ·CIolectilnSys

I 28% · Tr!JtmentPlant

... to protect public health and the environment

4 Sewer Rehabilitation fj} and Replacement

• Completed 26 of the 55 sewer projects designated for completion in the first 3 years. ~ • Most were completed ~ ahead of schedule .

. . . to protect public health and the environment

~ Sewer Relief ~ • Completed two major relief sewers. 0 East Central Interceptor Sewer (ECIS) 0 Northeast interceptor Sewer (NEIS -"'l'---1!'!!1"'1'""-"'!"""

... to protect public health and the environment

1 Supplemental Environmental & Projects • A restoration and revitalization of the LA River and its vicinity where wetlands existed along the riverbanks.

-~ I I I ,I· I i l

K Ir ...... ¥ •• -·~,- ~ ... < ' N-- "-'...... -r- l ,.• ;t ~,..,

Workplan prepared and being reviewed .

... to protect public health and the environment

Excellent results ~ 80°/o reduction in FOG \&,/ caused sewer overflows 300 _ --29{}______--,

250

~ 197 200 & Base lme 174 "C Year ~ 79% ai 150 - -- - - Reducti:,n ~ a: 32% fmm 117 Cl Reduction Baseline 0 fro m 40% Year "- 100 ~ Baseline ReductOn 0 Year fmm Baseline 62 .. Year Reduction 50 - ,~ ,- Year

200(}01 2001 ·02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Fiscal Year ... to protect public health and the environment

2 1iJ' Excel~;J,:~!~~~ion in root @ ~ caused sewer overflows

300 --- 29Q_ __ ------l

c!j 250 ?34, _____

"' First Year of "'al 200 - Root Control 1ii P rogram ai a: 19% Rcduction 150 137 15 from First Year 0 a: o f P rogram o 100 53 %Rcduction "" from First Year 50 of P rogram

... to protect public health and the environment

Excellent results ~ 45°/o reduction in overal~ sewer overflows 1,000

900 -

800

687 700 - 547 613 en 600 - Baseline 0en Year 6% Peduction ~--444 ~-- en 500 11 % From 0 Peduction .. 400 - Baseline -- 369 From Year 35% Baseline 300 - Peduction Year 46% From Peduction .et!E!!i.J..:1.!'.CiJi 200 - Baseline From Year Baseline 100 - Year ~ ·-

I }' 0 ·~ i« 2000-01 2001·02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 -~· Fiscal Year ... to protect public health and the environment

3 Excellent results . fj.

• Approved 5 year rate increase. • Improved bond rating.

-'. I I I I - ! - .e===----·' ·~5.e: ~=~.....- ..) !

.. . to protect public health and the environment

4 ' ' COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

September 30, 2005

lo lljl

••• to protect public health and the environment CITY OF Los ANGELE" BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS

COMMISSIONERS BUREAU OF SANITATION

YOLANDA FUENTES 433 SOUTH SPRING STREET VALERIE LYNNE SHAW Los ANGELES, CA 90013 TEL: (213) 473-7999 FAX: (213) 473-8100 September 30, 2005

Kathi Moore, Chief Clean Water Act Compliance (WTR-7) Water Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Attention: Mr. Ken Greenberg

Jonathan S. Bishop, Executive Officer Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board 320 W. 4th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, Ca. 90013 Attention: Mr. Sam Unger

Greetings:

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 FOR PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2005 COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER (CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-191-RSWL AND NO. 98-9039-RSWL CONSOLIDATED)

The City of Los Angeles is pleased to present the first annual report on the status of compliance with the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). The report was prepared and submitted for the period ending June 30, 2005 pursuant to Section VI-G (Paragraph 70 to 72) of the CSSA. The provisions of the CSSA are designed to protect neighborhoods and improve water quality throughout Los Angeles through a comprehensive program of sewer cleaning, upgrades and repairs. In partnership with the City's Department of Public Works' Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering and Sanitation, the City Attorney's Office and other City offices, consultant and contractors, this report demonstrates the City's diligent efforts in improving its performance. Our commitment has not only resulted in compliance but, in fact, surpassed the requirements of the CSSA and has resulted in excellent results.

The City has embraced this opportunity and has, in deed, assigned the CSSA compliance program the highest priority and provided the necessary resources to meet or exceed the requirements of the CSSA. Following an aggressive public outreach campaign that included over 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the importance of the CSSA and the need for additional funding, the City Council authorized sewer rate increases

AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Recyclllljellllllmadelicmrec)"l

Because of the complexity and time sensitive nature of the CSSA and the City's commitment to the CSSA, a committee called the Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) was created in September 2004. With representation from the various bureaus of the Department of Public Works and the City Attorney's Office, SAC oversees the progress of the CSSA compliance efforts. The SAC meets monthly to review and coordinate compliance activities and reports quarterly to the Board of Public Works.

The City is in full compliance with the CSSA and, in most cases, has exceeded the requirements. The great majority of projects have been completed ahead of the scheduled dates. Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) are steadily declining. For fiscal year 2004-05, SSOs were approximately 45 percent less than those in the baseline year of 2000-01. It is noteworthy to mention that spills continued to decline even with the City's recent second wettest season on record. Over the last two years, as a result of a focused chemical root control and sewer cleaning activities, root-caused SSOs have been reduced by 53 percent. SSOs caused by fats, oils and grease (FOG) were reduced by 80 percent since the inception of the FOG control program and as compared to those in the baseline year of 2000-01.

More sewers are being repaired. New sewers are being built. More sewers are being cleaned and inspected. New and state-of-the-art odor control facilities are being built. SSOs and odors continue to be on a steady decline. As a result of these efforts, our neighborhoods and the environment are getting healthier and safer.

A progress review meeting is being tentatively schedule for October 27, 2005 at 10:00 AM at our office at 2714 Media Center Drive. Formal notification will be made as soon as the date is confirmed.

In keeping up with our mission "to protect public health and the environment", I am grateful for the contributions of our dedicated staff to the success stories of this report. We all realize there is much more to do but I believe we have a good foundation and beginning.

If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the CSSA, please contact Mr. Adel Hagekhalil at (323) 342-6225.

Sincerely,

f L. NSON, Director Bureau of Sanitation RLR/AHH:tn/cr

l:\SA\1Annual Reports\2004-05\Actual Report\Annual Progress Report No 1 Final cover letter 093005.doc CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 FOR PERIOD ENDING ON JUNE 30, 2005

------~---j- - ··- ~ - .,,., ... ~-~ - • ,~ --<>-- ,.....,,,.,.,,_..,,__ ,,,-~ ~ - ,~~ ~=- -. -~'--

September 30, 2005

\ -:....--:::_1 (!--:.""_:-,..... ' . . ~··. _o (This page was intentionally left blank.) CERTIFICATION DECLARATION

I certify under penalty of law that this Annual Progress Report No. 1 for the Period Ending June 30, 2005 was prepared either by me personally or under my direction or supervision in a manner designed to ensure that qualified and knowledgeable personnel properly gathered and presented the information contained herein. I further certify, based on my personal knowledge or on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information and willful submission of a material false statement.

9/30/2005 Adel H. Hagekhalil Date Division Manager Wastewater Engineering Services Division Bureau of Sanitation (This page was intentionally left blank.) Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending on June 30, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... v

INTRODUCTION ...... 1

Purpose ...... 1 Background ...... 1 An Overview of the Annual Report ...... 2

ANNUAL REPORT ...... 5

a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects ...... 5 b. Rehabilitation and Replacement - Mileage Requirements ...... 10 c. Sewer Relief Projects ...... 10 d. Capacity Exceptions List ...... 13 e. Wastewater Capital Improvements ...... 23 f. Sewer Cleaning ...... 23 g. Sewer Line Television Assessment- Mileage ...... 25 h. Sewer Line Television Assessment- Condition Ratings ...... 26 i. Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program ...... 27 j. Primary and Secondary Basin Plans: ...... 30 k. MOUSE Model ...... 39 I. Chemical Root Control ...... 39 m. Significant Program Implementation ...... 40 n. Failure to Comply Projects ...... 41 o. Odor Outreach Plan ...... 41 p. Odor Control Facilities Construction Progress ...... 42 q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program ...... 45 r. Annual Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) Status Report ...... 47 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending on June 30, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FIGURES

Figure ES-1: Overall SSOs by Fiscal Year ...... vi Figure 1: Sewer Cleaning Progress ...... 24 Figure 2: Sewer Line Television Assessment Progress ...... 26 Figure 3: Condition Assessment Results ...... 27 Figure 4: FOG-Related SSOs by Fiscal Year ...... 30 Figure 5: Primary Basin Plans in Progress ...... 33 Figure 6: Secondary Sewershed Plans Completed ...... 37 Figure 7: Root Control Progress ...... 39 Figure 8: Root-Caused SSOs ...... 40

TABLES

Table 1 : Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects ...... 6 Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects...... 11 Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75% ...... 14 Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75% ...... 18 Table 5: Fiscal Year 2004-05 Sewer Cleaning Data ...... 24 Table 6: Television Assessment Overview ...... 25 Table 7: Condition Assessment Results ...... 26 Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results ...... 27 Table 9: Referral Investigation Summary ...... 29 Table 10: Status of Primary Sewer Plans ...... 30 Table 11: Completed Secondary Basin Plans ...... 35 Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities ...... 43 Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations ...... 45 Table 14: Summary of Progress on SEPs ...... 48

ATTACHMENTS

A: Wastewater Capital Improvement Program Summary B: Summary Status of CSSA Deliverables C: Summary Status of the North Atwater Creek Restoration & Water Quality Enhancement Project

ii Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending on June 30, 2005

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym or Definition Abbreviation ATF Air Treatment Facilitv Bavkeeper Santa Monica Bavkeeper CCTV Closed-Circuit Television CDO Cease and Desist Order Citv Citv of Los Angeles cos Coastal Interceptor Sewer CSSA Collection System Settlement Agreement d/D Flow depth (inches )!Pipe Diameter (inches) ECA Engineering Contractors Association ECIS East Central Interceptor Sewer ERIS Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer ERP/ERG Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response Guide FOG Fats, Oil and Grease FSE Food Service Establishment FY Citv of Los Angeles' Fiscal Year (July 1 through June 30) GBIS Glendale-Burbank Interceptor Sewer In. Inches IRP Integrated Resource Plan LARWQCB Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board MH Maintenance Hole MOUSE Model of Urban Sewer Evaluation NCOS North Central Outfall Sewer NEIS Northeast Interceptor Sewer No. Number NORS North Outfall Replacement Sewer NOS North Outfall Sewer NOV Notice of Violation NPDES National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System PDWF Peak Dry Weather Flow SAC Settlement Agreement Committee SEP Suoolementary Environmental Project SMARTS Sewer Management Automated Repair Tracking System SOPs Standard Operatina Procedures SS Os Sanitary Sewer Overflows SSRP Secondary Sewer Renewal Program US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agencv VSLFRS Valley Spring Lane & Forman Relief Sewer WCCD Wastewater Conveyance Construction Division WCIP Wastewater Capital Improvement Proaram WCSD Wastewater Collection System Division WLAIS West Los Angeles Interceptor Sewer

iii Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending on June 30, 2005

{This page was intentionally left blank.)

iv Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The City of Los Angeles is pleased to present the first annual report on the status of compliance with the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). The report was prepared and submitted for the period ending June 30, 2005 pursuant to Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the CSSA. This report is also available on the Bureau of Sanitation's website at http://www.lasewers.org/CSSA/arno1.pdf. The provisions of the CSSA are designed to protect neighborhoods and improve water quality throughout Los Angeles through a comprehensive management program including sewer cleaning, upgrades, and repairs. In partnership with the City's Department of Public Works' Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering, and Sanitation, the City Attorney's Office and other City offices, consultants, and contractors, this report demonstrates the City's diligent efforts which have not only resulted in compliance but, in fact, have surpassed the requirements of the CSSA with excellent results.

The City has embraced this opportunity and has, indeed, assigned the CSSA compliance program the highest priority and provided the necessary resources to meet or exceed the requirements of the CSSA. On February 2, 2005, the City Council authorized sewer rate increases for the next five years following an aggressive public outreach campaign that included over 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the importance of the CSSA and the need for additional funding. On June 7, 2005, the City Council authorized the addition of 21 staff to the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation to address the need for adequate staffing.

Because of the complexity and time sensitive nature of the CSSA, a committee called the Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) was created in September 2004. With representation from the various Bureaus of the Department of Public Works and the City Attorney's Office, the SAC oversees the progress of the CSSA compliance efforts. The SAC meets monthly to review and coordinate compliance activities and reports progress quarterly to the Board of Public Works.

The City is in full compliance with the CSSA and, in most cases, has exceeded the requirements. The great majority of required projects have been completed ahead of the scheduled dates. Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) are steadily declining. As shown in Figure ES-1, the overall SSOs in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004-05 were approximately 45 percent less than those of the baseline FY of 2000-01. It is noteworthy that spills continued to decline even with the City's recent second wettest season on record. Over the last two years, as a result of a focused chemical root control and sewer cleaning activities, root-caused SSOs have been reduced by 53 percent. SSOs caused by fats, oils, and grease (FOG) were reduced by 79 percent since the inception of the FOG control program in Fiscal Year 2000-01.

The City is fully committed to meeting all of the requirements of the CSSA as evidenced by its solid start during Year One of the CSSA. The accomplishments listed in this report show, in most cases, that the City moved beyond the requirements of the CSSA. Each future annual report will show additional enhancements to the wastewater collection system operation,

v Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

maintenance, and management. The City looks forward to continuing to support the ultimate objective of the CSSA, which is to protect our neighborhoods and improve water quality.

Figure ES-1: Overall SSOs by Fiscal Year

1,000

900

800 687 700 647 613

r-- II) 600 - Baseline 0 Year U) 6% U) - - Reduction f--- 500 11% 444 From 0 Reduction =It: Baseline 'llltft 400 - - f--- From r-- Year Baseline 35% Reduction 300 - - r-- Year r-- - 46% f-- From Reduction Baseline 200 - r-- f--- r-- r-- From - Year Baseline Year 100 - - f--- r-- r-- -

0 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Fiscal Year

The following is a brief summary of the City's compliance efforts during FY 2004-05:

• Forty-five of the 127 deliverables that are due during the 10-year term of the CSSA have been completed in Year One of the CSSA or ahead of schedule with the remaining deliverables being on target. • Twenty-six of the 55 projects designated by the CSSA for the first three years have been completed, most of them ahead of schedule. • The two largest sewer relief projects, the East Central Interceptor Sewer and the Northeast Interceptor Sewer, have been completed. • The City continues to implement its sewer-cleaning program, including hot spot cleaning. In FY 2004-05 the City cleaned 82,000 pipe reaches, which is 36 percent more than the 60,000 reaches required in the CSSA. In addition, the City's quality assurance and follow-up inspection programs ensure that cleaning operations are effective. • Using Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) technology and utilizing both City crews and contractors, the City assessed the structural and maintenance conditions of 821 miles of sewer lines, 36 percent beyond the 600 miles required by the CSSA.

vi Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA} Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

• The sewer line condition assessment in this report for the 821 miles inspected by CCTV indicates that 87 percent of the sewers assessed are in good to excellent condition. • All 7,832 permitted food service establishments (FSEs) have been inspected at least once as part of the City's FOG Control Program. A total of 15,000 inspections were conducted with a total of 944 notices of violation issued with 462 cases forwarded for further enforcement. Since the inception of the FOG Program in 2001, FOG-related SSOs have been reduced by 79 percent. • The City has made excellent progress on the development of its primary and secondary sewer master plans. • The City has completed the development of the "R" modeling factors for the basins within the MOUSE predictive model. • 474 miles of root-infested sewers were chemically treated, far in excess of the CSSA requirement of 150 miles. This has resulted in significant reduction in root-caused SSOs. • The City issued four quarterly reports summarizing the sewer overflows. Total SSOs for FY 2004-05 were approximately 45 percent less than those experienced in the baseline year of 2000-01. • The City amended its sewer design manual as required in Section V-D (Paragraph 20) of the CSSA to accommodate excessive wet weather flow. • The City has paid all negotiated civil penalties and attorney fees on schedule as set forth in the CSSA. • The City has implemented all of the required odor control and response modifications. The City's sewer odor hotline is in place and odor response measures, including chemical addition, are being employed. Odor control activities are routinely reported to the community Odor Advisory Board. • During this reporting period, four interim odor scrubbers were placed in operation. Two additional scrubbers under construction are 70 percent complete. Permanent air treatment facilities are in design. • Recommendations from the independent consultant for sewer odor control are being implemented. • The City has initiated the development of work plans for the Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs). The work plan for the North Atwater Creek Restoration and Water Quality Enhancement Project is currently being reviewed by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) staff. The next scheduled work plan is for the Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Project which will be completed by March 2006. • The City Council authorization of a sewer rate increase and 21 additional staff positions are significant program modifications that will contribute to the sustained success of this program. • The Settlement Agreement Committee will continue to provide oversight and support to the City's CSSA compliance program.

vii Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.)

viii Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

INTRODUCTION

Purpose

This first annual progress report (Annual Report) has been prepared by the City of Los Angeles (City) to comply with Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). This Annual Report summarizes the City's compliance efforts during the year ending on June 30, 2005. This report is also available on the Bureau of Sanitation's website at http://www.lasewers.org/CSSA/arno1.pdf.

Background

During February 1998, the wettest February in Los Angeles' history, sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) occurred in a number of communities with the majority occurring in the Eagle Rock and South Los Angeles areas. In response to these SSOs, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) requiring construction of several new sewer lines to prevent additional wet weather overflows. These projects were to be completed within seven years and approached a cost of $600 million. During the same time period, the Santa Monica Baykeeper (BayKeeper) filed a Federal lawsuit against the City asking for injunctive relief due to the SSOs. In January 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the LARWQCB and a number of community groups representing residents in South Los Angeles joined the BayKeeper in its lawsuit against the City. The plaintiffs alleged that the City's SSOs and odor problems violated the Clean Water Act and the terms and conditions of the National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for the Hyperion and the Terminal Island Treatment Plants for the operation and maintenance of the City's sewer system.

With the City's enhancements to its sewer system and renewed commitment by all parties to reach a manageable settlement that would protect neighborhoods and improve water quality throughout Los Angeles, the parties were able to reach this landmark settlement in August 2004. The objectives of the CSSA were: to resolve the pending consolidated litigation; to set out a program that the City would implement to reduce SSOs through a comprehensive program of sewer cleaning, upgrades, and repairs; and to investigate, resolve, and mitigate sewer odors to the maximum extent practicable. The CSSA was signed by all parties and filed with the court on August 5, 2004. On October 29, 2004, the United States Central District Court officially approved and entered the CSSA.

The following is a brief summary of the terms of the CSSA, which requires the City to:

1) Enhance the City's sewer condition assessment program. Assess a minimum of 600 miles of sewers annually with focus on older sewers and those susceptible to blockages.

1 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

2) Increase the City's sewer repair, rehabilitation, and replacement efforts. Commit to the current program for the first three years and evaluate future needs with a minimum commitment of renewal of 60 miles per year after the third year. 3) Continue with the City's Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program and enhance the inspection and enforcement of the Program. 4) Upgrade the sewer cleaning efforts with focus on those sewers that are prone to blockages. Commit to a minimum annual sewer cleaning of 60,000 pipe reaches or approximately 2,600 miles. 5) Continue with current chemical root control efforts in sewers prone to blockages and expand the program to meet needs. 6) Increase the City's collection system capacity evaluation and assurance efforts. Implement identified relief sewer projects for the first three years and evaluate needs for the future. Revise the City's sewer design criteria to account for wet weather flow. Perform the necessary master planning for both large and small sewers and upgrade computer modeling capabilities to be used as enhanced planning tools. 7) Operate the sewer odor hotline and the necessary odor control efforts while expanding it Citywide. Construct the planned odor control facilities and continue the odor assessment and mitigation measures including the preparation of a Citywide odor control master plan. 8) Implement $8.5 million in supplemental environmental enhancement projects in lieu of penalties. 9) Continue with the sewer spill reporting on a quarterly basis. 10)Abide by the term of the CSSA (10 years) with possible early termination.

An Overview of the Annual Report

This Annual Report presents the City's progress in its efforts to comply with the terms of the CSSA for the year ending on June 30, 2005. The content and structure of this Report are based on the requirements set forth in Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the CSSA. The Annual Report's sections appear in the same alphabetical order ("a" through "n") used in Section VI-G of the CSSA and continue with additional sections ("o" through "r") in response to Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the CSSA.

The followlng llsts the Report sections and provides a brief summary of compliance with the CSSA requirements: a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects: Twenty-six of the 55 projects designated by the CSSA for the first three years have been completed, most of them ahead of schedule. b. Rehabilitation and Replacement - Mileage Requirements: This provision applies to Years Four through Ten of the CSSA.

2 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

c. Sewer Relief Projects: The CSSA designated construction of ten sewer relief projects during the first three years. The two largest of these projects have been completed (East Central Interceptor Sewer and the Northeast Interceptor Sewer). d. Capacity Exceptions List: As required, this report includes the current capacity exceptions list. Listed are the sewers flowing at depth greater than 75 percent of the pipe diameter during peak dry weather flow (PDWF), along with the City's planned action for these locations. Also listed are the sewers with PDWF depth exceeding 50 percent but less than or equal to 75 percent of the pipe diameter. Many of these locations are already part of our ongoing planning and capacity assurance efforts. e. Wastewater Capital Improvements: The City expended $225 million in wastewater capital improvement in FY 2004-05, of which $130 million (58 percent) was spent for collection system improvements. For FY 2005-06, the projected total wastewater capital improvement expenditure is $280 million with $160 million (57 percent) designated for the collection system. Attachment "A" is a summary of the City's current 10-year capital improvement expenditure plan. A complete copy of the current 10-year Wastewater Capital Improvement Program (FYs 2005-06 through 2014-15) is available at http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf. A summary of the program is provided as Attachment A. The Wastewater Capital Improvement Program is currently undergoing its annual review and update. f. Sewer Cleaning: The City continues to implement its sewer-cleaning program, including hot spot cleaning. The City cleaned 82,000 pipes in FY 2004-05, 36 percent more than the 60,000 pipes required in the CSSA. In addition, quality assurance and follow-up inspection programs continue to ensure the effectiveness of cleaning operations. g. Sewer Line Television Assessment- Mileage: Using Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) technology and utilizing both City crews and contractors, the City assessed the structural and maintenance conditions of 821 miles of sewer lines, 36 percent beyond the 600 miles required by the CSSA. h. Sewer Line Television Assessment • Condition Ratings: The sewer line condition assessment in this report for the 821 miles inspected by CCTV indicates that 87 percent of the sewers assessed are in good to excellent condition. i. Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Control Program: All permitted food service establishments (FSEs) have been inspected at least once as part of the City's FOG Control Program. This report contains detailed information on the program implementation. j. Primary and Secondary Basin Plans: The City has made excellent progress on the development of its primary and secondary sewer master plans. Eight Primary Basin Plans are scheduled for completion by July 2006, and all 25 are scheduled for completion by March 2009. A total of nine Secondary Basin Plans have been completed to date, and twelve more are scheduled for completion by July 2006. k. MOUSE Model: The City has completed the development of the "R" modeling factors for the basins within the MOUSE predictive model. I. Chemical Root Control: During FY 2004-05, 474 miles of root-infested sewers were chemically treated, far in excess of the CSSA requirement of 150 miles. This has resulted in significant reduction in root-caused SSOs, as indicated by the 53 percent reduction in root-related SSOs since program inception in FY 2002-03.

3 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

m. Settlement Agreement Implementation: The City Council authorization of a sewer rate increase and 21 additional staff positions are significant program modifications that will contribute to the sustained success of this program. The formation of the Settlement Agreement Committee; organizational changes; and improved planning, design, and operation and maintenance processes will provide further support to and focus on the CSSA compliance program. n. Failure to Comply Projects: The City has complied with all requirements of the CSSA to date.

The following is additional Information on topics outside of those required by Section VI-G of the CSSA: o. Odor Outreach in accordance with Paragraph 36 of CSSA: The City has implemented all of the required odor control and response modifications. The City's sewer odor hotline is in place and odor response measures, including chemical addition, are being employed. Odor control activities are routinely reported to the community Odor Advisory Board. p. Odor Control Facilities per Paragraph 53: During this reporting period, four interim odor scrubbers were placed in operation. Two additional scrubbers under construction are 70 percent complete. Permanent air treatment facilities are in design. q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program per Paragraph 57: Recommendations from the independent odor control consultant are being implemented. r. Supplemental Environmental Projects per Paragraph 94: Status reports for SEPs are included in this report. Detailed progress on the North Atwater Creek Restoration SEP is also attached.

4 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

ANNUAL REPORT a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Prolects

Appendix "B" of the CSSA includes a list of designated sewer rehabilitation and replacement projects to be completed during the first three years of the CSSA. Table 1 summarizes completed projects and the current status of each ongoing project.

The City has been aggressively pursuing the implementation of all projects required by the CSSA and assigned them the highest priority and the necessary resources. As shown, 26 of the 55 projects listed in Appendix "B" have been completed to date, all of them well ahead of schedule. Of the remaining projects, only one, the Wilshire Area Northeast Sewer Rehabilitation Project, was not completed by its original scheduled completion date of August 30, 2005 due to unforeseen construction conditions. An extension to the schedule was granted by USEPA and the LARWQCB based on unforeseen conditions. The new completion date is November 30, 2005. However, the project was actually completed on September 9, 2005.

5 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Status Project Title Construction Comments (Yes or No) End Date

EQ RPR SWRS U298 12/14/2004 Yes Completed 6/9/04. Completed 188 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U277 01/13/2005 Yes Completed 7/20/04. Completed 177. days ahead of schedule. EQ RP~ SWRS U269 01/13/2005 Yes Completed 7/20/04. Completed 177 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U290 02/11/2005 Yes Completed 6/10/04. Completed 246: days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U289 02/11/2005 Yes Completed 6/10/04. Completed 246. days ahead of schedule. SAN PEDRO AREA SWR 02/28/2005 Yes Completed 9/7/04. Completed 174; days ahead of schedule. REHAB! EQ RPR SWRS U346 03/16/2005 Yes Completed 5/4/04. Completed 316 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U344 03/16/2005 Yes Completed 5/4/04. Completed 316 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U373 04/15/2005 Yes Completed 5/12/04. Completed 338 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U369 04/15/2005 Yes Completed 5/12/04. Completed 338 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U327 05/16/2005 Yes Completed 6/23/04. Completed 327 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPF{ SWRS U317 05/16/2005 Yes Completed 6/23/04. Completed 327 days ahead of schedule. SOUTH LA CSRP:U - 6 07/30/2005 Yes Completed 8/4/04. Completed 360 days ahead of schedule. ' . SOUTH LA CSRP U - 5 07/30/2005 Yes Completed 8/4/04. Completed 360 days ahead of schedule. SOUTH LA CSRP U - 3 07/30/2005 Yes Completed 12/22/04. Completed 220 days ahead of schedule.

6 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Status Project Title Construction Comments (Yes or No) End Date

WILSHIRE AREA NE SWR Original 08/30/05 No On Schedule Working closely with the contractor to complete REHAB Revised 11/30/05 construction by November 30, 2005. MT WASHINGTON AREA 09/30/2005 Yes Completed 11/2/04. Completed 332 days ahead of schedule. SWRREHAB S BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB 12/8/2005 Yes Completed 8/10/05.* Completed 120 days ahead of schedule. HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM 12/30/2005 Yes Completed 3/2/05. Completed 303 days ahead of schedule. SWRREHAB 4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR 12/30/2005 No On Schedule Construction is 15% complete. REHAB EQ RPR SWRS U274 03/16/2006 Yes Completed 10/6/04. Completed 526 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U340 04/15/2006 Yes Completed 3/25/05. Completed 386 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U283 04/15/2006 Yes Completed 3/25/05. Completed 396 days ahead of schedule. HARBOR AREA CSRP U- 6 05/30/2006 Yes Completed 8/2/05.* Completed 301 days ahead of schedule. NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR 05/31/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 95% complete. RE PLC EQ RPR SWRS U300 07/15/2006 Yes Completed 11 /15/04. Completed 607 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U299 07/15/2006 Yes Completed 11/15/04. Completed 607 days ahead of schedule. LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR 07/30/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 85% complete. REP LC

7 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Status Project Tltle Construction Comments (Yes or No) End Date

HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U- 07/30/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 98% complete. 2 EQ RPR SWRS U295 09/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U292 09/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U291 09/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U354 10/14/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U339 11/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 85% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U338 11/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 85% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U320 12/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U316 12/15/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 99% complete. WASHINGTON FLOWER 12/30/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 90% complete. GRAND SWR REPLC CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-5 12/30/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 90% complete. CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-3 & 12/30/2006 No On Schedule Bids were opened on June 22, 2005. Bid & U-4 Award is 90% complete. 12TH HILL SWR REHAB 12/30/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 92% complete. SAN FERNANDO PSDNA 12/31/2006 No On Schedule Design was completed on August 10, 2005. SWRREHAB

8 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

b. Rehabilitation and Replacement - Mileage Requirements

For Years four through Ten of the CSSA, the City is required to report the number of miles of sewer pipes that have been rehabilitated and replaced in the previous Fiscal Year, and, for Years Six through Ten, to report the three-year average of sewer pipes rehabilitated and replaced in the previous three Fiscal Years. There is no reporting requirement in this reporting period. c. Sewer Relief Projects

Appendix A of the CSSA includes a list of designated sewer relief projects to be completed during the first three years of the CSSA. Table 2 summarizes completed projects and the current status of each on-going project.

The City has been diligently pursuing the implementation of all projects required by the CSSA and assigned them the highest priority and the necessary resources. As shown, two of the ten projects have been completed to date. Of the remaining projects, five are in the bid and award process and two are under construction. Only one, the Avenue 45 Arroyo Drive Relief Sewer Project, is behind schedule.

The Avenue 45 Arroyo Drive Relief Sewer Project was to be completed by October 6, 2006. The project will construct 12,500 linear feet of new sewer to relieve an overloaded primary sewer system in the Eagle Rock and Highland Park Areas. The delay was due to unforeseen construction difficulties related to groundwater levels, access, easements and soil conditions. These unforeseen conditions also resulted in major complications in the bid and award of the construction contract, including limited and abnormally and excessively high bids. The City requested extension of the construction completion date to October 30, 2009 in a letter to USEPA and LARWQCB and dated August 25, 2005.

10 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabllltatlon and Replacement Projects I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Status Project Title Construction Comments (Yes or No) End Date

EQ RPR SWRS U294 01/13/2007 Yes Completed 6/15/05. Completed 587 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U293 01/16/2007 Yes Completed 6/15/05. Completed 590 days ahead of schedule. EQ RPR SWRS U319 02/15/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 50% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U318 02/15/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 50% complete. HARBOR AREA CSRP U-3 03/03/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 35% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U342 03/15/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 25% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U341 03/15/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 25% complete. FLINT AVE G ST SWR REPLC 03/24/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 90% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U304 04/14/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 16% complete. EQ RPR SWRS U296 04/14/2007 No On Schedule Construction is 16% complete. HOOVER ST SWR REHAB 05/02/2007 No On Schedule Design is 93% complete. LINCOLN 83RD SWR REPLC 06/30/2007 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 50% complete. HARBOR AREA CSRP U- 5 & 06/30/2007 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 50% complete. WILM U-20

9 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Title Construction Project Status Comments (Yes or No) End Date EAST CENTRAL 08/27/2004 Yes Completed 8/9/04. Completed 18 days ahead of schedule. INTERCEPTOR SEWER NORTH EAST INTERCEPTOR 10/30/2005 Yes Completed Completed 156 days ahead of schedule. SEWER, PHASE 1 5/27/05. AVE 45 ARROYO DR RELIEF 10/06/2006 No Behind Schedule Revising Construction Plans with a new project SEWER schedule. Request was made to Government Plaintiffs on August 25, 2005 for extension of Construction End Date to 10/30/2009. EAGLE ROCK INTERCEPTOR 10/30/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 62% complete. SEWER BAYWOOD BENEDICT 10/31/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 70% complete. EASEMENT SEWER FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO 10/31/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 30% complete. SEWER BUCKINGHAM ROAD 11/11/2006 No On Schedule Construction is 30% complete. DIVERSION SEWER SEPULVEDA SHERMAN OAKS 12/30/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 35% complete. NALLEY MEADOW RELIEF SEWER

11 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Title Construction Project Status Comments (Yes or No) End Date NOS DIVERSION AT 12/31/2006 No On Schedule Bid & Award is 90% complete. HUMBOLDT STREET BTW AVE 18 & SAN FERNANDO ROAD SLAUSON I VAN NESS I COS 12/31/2006 No On Schedule Design was completed on June 28, 2005. EXTERNAL BYPASS Currentlyin Bid & Award.

12 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

d. Capacity Exceptions List

The Capacity Exceptions List is provided below in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 Iists sewer gauging locations that exhibit peak dry weather flow (PDWF) levels exceeding 75 percent of the pipe diameter. Table 4 lists locations that exhibit PDWF levels exceeding 50 percent of the pipe diameter but less than or equal to 75 percent of the pipe diameter. The CSSA requires the City to report planned actions on the locations that exceed the City trigger flow level of 75 percent of the pipe diameter.

Many of these locations are either being addressed through an existing capital improvement project or being evaluated throughout master planning efforts. Some of the locations were reported to exhibit PDWF levels exceeding 50 percent of the pipe diameter based on the latest gauging data although the historical trend does not support this result. As such, these locations are being reviewed with the City's maintenance and engineering staff for necessary action.

13 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%

No. MH No. Location Size (in.) d/D Planned/Proposed Action 1 46715026 R/W 800' S/0 ECHO ST AT 18 Flowing Full The Avenue 45 Arroyo Dr Relief Sewer, which is currently in AVE50 design, will provide relief to this location. The completion of the Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer (ERIS} in spring 2006 will also help relieve this sewer. 2 53401077 GRANVILLE@ 30 Flowing Full Maintenance issue. The West Los Angeles Interceptor Sewer BROOKHAVEN (WLAIS) Maintenance Hole (MH} Addition project will provide new MHs and will clean the WLAIS System. Projected future flow does not indicate any need for future relief. After the WLAIS System is cleaned, the City will continue to reevaluate future capacity needs. 3 55807059 60TH PL 330W/O 34 Flowing Full Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue NORMANDIE AV Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and the Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will address ultimate relief ~or this system. 4 55807066 WESTERN AV CL 300' S/0 18 Flowing Full Debris in the Florence Avenue Sewer and resulting high flow 60TH PL contributes to the high d/D at this location. The Florence Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the Florence Avenue Sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS- Slauson and the Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-8Iauson will address ultimate relief for this system. 5 55807126 NORMANDIE AV AT 64TH ST 30 Flowing Full Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and the Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-81auson will address ultimate relief for this system.

6 55812097 FLORENCE AV 350' E/0 20 Flowing Full Debris downstream of this sewer contributes to the high d/D. The WERMONTAV Florence Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to reolace the downstream sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer

14 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%

No. MH No. Location Size (in.) d10· Planned/Proposed Action ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will address ultimate relief for this system. 7 61309059 KING AV 50' S/0 AL TON ST 18 Flowing Full Past Gauging data does not suggest a capacity problem. Further investigation underway. 8 62009134 HARBOR BL EIS AT 2ND ST 21 96% Maintenance Issue. Placed on a Regular Maintenance Program. S/PL Sewers will be monitored through the regular gauging program. There is no capacity issue. 9 53806111 SOTO ST 260 S/0 LUGO ST 27 95% MH 53806129 is an existing Venturi Flume measuring flow between the City of LA and City of Vernon downstream of this location. The ~ume restricts flow and creates upstream backwater conditions. The Soto St Gauging Chamber Modification project will modify the chamber. 10 55812086 FLORENCE AV 300' E/0 30 90% Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue NORMANDIE AV Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson Projects will address ultimate relief for this system. 11 55812093 FLORENCE AV 300' W/0 30 89% Debris in the sewer contributes to the high d/D. The Florence VERMONT AV Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson Projects will address ultimate relief for this system. 12 62013031 HARBOR BL R/W 33 89% The high d/D reading was due to construction activities for the Siphon Harbor Crossing Relocation, which was recently completed. Additional gauging will be requested to verify post-construction sewer conditions.

13 55807086 ~2ND ST N/S 33' E/0 54 88% The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to the Central HARVARD BL. Outfall Sewer (COS) will orovide relief for this sewer. Currentlv in

15 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%

No. MH No. Location Size (in.) d/D Planned/Proposed Action

Bid & Award process. High d/D is caused by the hydraulic restriction downstream. 14 55807040 ~OTH ST N/S 1ST MH W/0 39 86% Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue $T. ANDREWS PLACE Sewer Rehabilitation project will be built to replace the sewer. Ultimate relief will be addressed by the Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson. 15 55806217 l62ND ST E/0 HMS AV 54 86% The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to the COS will provide relief for this sewer. Currently in Bid & Award process. 16 55806220 tvAN NESS AV AT 59TH ST 54 85% The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to COS will provide relief for this sewer. Currently in Bid & Award process. 17 53504136 M.L.KING BL AT RODEO RD 54 85% The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to COS will 35' S/0 N/CURB) provide relief for this sewer. Currently in Bid & Award process. 18 44306177 IACAMA ST AT FAIR AV 57 84% High flow is due to reduction of flow at the Donald C. Tillman Water Reclamation Plant (DCTWRP) due to construction activities for the nitrogen removal projects. Long-term relief is being addressed in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The Valley Spring Lane & Forman Relief Sewer (VSLFRS), Glendale-Burbank Relief Interceptor Sewer (GBIS) and Northeast Interceptor Sewer (NEIS) Phase II will provide relief to this sewer. The draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the IRP, which will address GBIS and NEIS Phase II, will be out for public review by the end of the year. 19 51806192 ~RESCENT HEIGHTS BL AT 39 83% Past gauging events did not show any indication of high flow. IAIRDROME ST Review and validation of the recent gauging results is underway. 20 49208174 MARTEL AV. 400' N/0 72 82% High flow is due to reduction of flow at DCTWRP due to K)AKWOOD construction activities for the nitrogen removal projects and due to diversion of flow away from sewers prone to wet weather overflow. The Diversion will cease with the completion of the Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer. Long-term relief is being addressed in the IRP. The GBIS and NEIS Phase II will orovide relief to this sewer. The

16 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%

No. MHNo. Location Size (In.) d/D Planned/Proposed Action draft EIR for the IRP, which will address GBIS and NEIS Phase II, will be out for public review by the end of the year. 21 55802143 4TH AV W/S 75' N/0 75 82% The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to COS will SLAUSON AV provide relief for this sewer. Currently in Bid & Award process. 22 51815096 ADAMS BL AT BURNSIDE AV 21 81% The Adams Blvd Relief Sewer project will provide relief for this NORTH) sewer. Currently in Design. 23 46713275 S.F. RD EIS 2ND MH S/0 18 78% The Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer (ERIS) will provide relief to this ELM ST. sewer. ERIS is currently in construction and scheduled for completion in spring 2006. 24 55806046 ALLEY E/0 VAN NESS AV 30' 39 77% Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue S/059THST Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace the sewer. Ultimate relief will be addressed by the Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson. 25 46816021 NEWELL ST. 250' NE/0 24 76% The ERIS will provide relief to this sewer. ERIS is currently in BLAKE AV construction and scheduled for completion in spring 2006. 26 53410035 WICTORIA AV@ BUTLER AV 36 75% Maintenance issue. The WLAIS MH Addition will provide new MH and will clean the WLAIS System. Projected future flow does not indicate any need for future relief. After the WLAIS System is cleaned future capacity needs will be evaluated.

Notes: in. =inches d/D =measured gepth of flow (in.)/pipe Qiameter (in.) MH No. =Maintenance Hole Number PDWF = Peak Dry Weather Flow

17 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MH No. Location Size (In.) d/D

1 53410035 VICTORIA AV @ BUTLER AV 36 75% 2 35809050 FOX ST AT OMELVEN AV 18 73% 3 53602139 ARLINGTON AV EIS 175'SIO 36TH 30 73% ST 4 55807098 WESTERNAVATGAGEAV 18 73% 5 53603048 JEFFERSON BL SIS EIO 20 73% GRAMERCY PL 6 53401147 NATIONAL BLVD., 200' EIO 24 73% BARRINGTON 7 39515015 SHERMAN WAY NIS 300' W/0 24 72% lASMANAV 8 55812135 VERMONT AV EIS AT 75TH ST 27 72% 9 49401178 LOCKWOOD AV 350' EIO VIRGIL 15 71% AV 10 53503180 LA BREA AV WIO WIPL 729' N/0 54 70% RODEO RD 11 51816109 ADAMS BL S/S AT PALM GROVE 15 70% AV 12 38809101 WOODMAN AV EIS (IN PKWY} 600' 21 69% S/0 TERRA BELLA ST 13 55706031 lAVALON BL AT 59TH ST NE/MH 18 69% 14 39212013 PLUMMER ST. SIS 25' S/0 CL 50' 18 68% EIO HANNA AV 15 39913010 SHERMAN WY 650' W/0 27 68% HAZELTINE AV 16 55803144 NORMANDIE AV AT 58TH ST 16 68% 17 49307156 MAPLEWOOD AV AT HOBART BL 16 67% 18 49204111 VISTA ST WIS 235' SIO ROMAIN 42 67% ST(E&WMHS) 19 51716017 22ND ST N/S 50' EIO RAYMOND 18 67% IAV 20 51807118 GENESEE AV. 144' S/0 PICO 78 67% BLVD 21 53604056 !JEFFERSON BL 12' S/0 CL 1ST 14 67% MH EIO CATALINA ST 22 46812095 EAGLE ROCK BL. EIS 11 O' S/0 24 66% lAVE 30 CL PROJECTED 23 51810122 STEARNS DR AT GUTHERIE AV 39 66%

18 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MH No. Location Size (In.) d/D

24 55802170 SLAUSON AV AT CIMARRON ST 42 66% 25 55709117 74TH ST 1ST MH EIO HOOVER ST 36 66% 26 61311104 DST 210' EIO MCFARLAND ST 16 66% 27 42701116 LANKERSHIM BL. W/S AT HAMLIN 15 65% STW/INT. 28 61314067 ~STATMARINEAV 18 65% 29 56104084 IZANJA ST 50' W/0 WALNUT AVE 18 64% 30 49513076 GIBBONS ST 475' S/0 NORTH 24 64% MAIN ST. 31 51713017 !VIRGINIA RD 1ST MH N/0 23RD 15 63% ST 32 53401133 NATIONAL BL 200' EIO 30 63% BARRINGTON AV 33 49216010 MARTEL AV EIS 50' S/0 3RD ST 72 63% 34 49208011 ORANGE DR EIS 320' S/0 18 63% WILLOUGHBY AV 35 51814202 VENICE BL S/S 260' EIO DAUPHIN 24 63% AV 36 39510064 WOODLAKE AV E/S 417' S/0 15 63% SATICOYST 37 49413010 NORTH CORONDOLET ST AT 15 63% COUNCIL ST 38 53407095 !VENICE BL S/S 100' EIO 60 62% WESTWOOD BL 39 51712108 BUDLONG AV W/S AT 20TH ST 15 62% SIS 40 53803144 CONCORD ST AT OPAL ST 14 62% 41 56107230 WASHINGTON ST 42 62% 42 51814134 FAIRFAX AV. 495' S/0 SMILEY DR 98.5 62% 43 51805019 SHENANDOAH ST E/S 3RD MH 33 62% S/0 PICO BL. 44 39808045 VAN NUYS BL 330' N/0 BLYTHE 15 62% ST 45 53603058 JEFFERSON BL AT BRIGHTON AV 18 62% 46 51805082 SHENANDOAH ST EIS 90' S/0 33 61% PICKFORD ST 47 55701114 BROADWAY AT 58TH ST 16 61%

19 Collection System Settlement Agreement {CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MHNo. Location Size (in.) d/D

48 55710098 AVALON BL EIS N/0 71ST ST 21 61% 49 53614020 4TH AV 50' S/0 VERNON AV 75 61% 50 49513015 AVE 17 CL N/0 ALBION ST. EIS 54 61%

51 51812090 ORANGE DR 5' W/0 CL ALLEY S/0 45 60% WASHINGTON BL 52 56007001 HAVELOCK AV 200' W/0 24 60% MARSHALL DR 53 49316080 VERMONT AV S/0 4TH ST 20 60% 54 49510098 NORTH BROADWAY AT SICHEL 15 60% ST. 55 53203036 PCH @ 200" W/0 ENTRADA DR 42 59% 56 55702109 MAIN ST AT 58TH ST 16 59% 57 52115200 PCH W/S 336' N/0 OLD PUMP 30 59% PLANT 58 46812105 EAGLE ROCK BL. W/S 350' S/0 18 59% !AVE 30 59 51814020 WASHINGTON BL N/S 30' SW/0 15 59% FWY OFFRAMP CL 60 44202135 MILBANK ST AT MAMMOTH AV 18 59% 61 56108008 !ALLEY N/0 HAYWRD ST AT MARR 24 59% ST 62 49509071 !AVE 18 220' S/0 PASADENA AV. 24 59% 63 51810137 GENESEE AVE W/S 2ND MH S/0 84 58% VENICE BL 64 49311066 WESTERN AV 1ST MH S/0 14 58% BEVERLY BL 65 49204019 ORANGE DR EIS AT 320' S/0 15 58% FOUNTAIN AV 66 51703076 IROLO ST 225' S/0 7TH ST 20 58% 67 51509057 MISSION BL. AT 4TH ST. 48 58% 68 51814132 SMILEY DR 1ST MH EIO CLYDE 15 58% AV 69 56007106 RANDALL ST AT BEATRICE ST. 27 58% 70 51803032 8TH ST W/0 SIERRA BONITA AV 78 57% 71 49210068 LA CIENEGA BL W/S 2ND MH S/0 18 57% BEVERLY BL

20 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MHNo. Location Size (In.) d/D

72 49505104 S.F. RD EIS 300' N/0 HURON ST 24 57% 73 39611031 SATICOY ST N/S 270' W/0 OSO 15 57% AV 74 53602042 ARLINGTON AV E/S 175'S/O 30TH 24 57% ST

75 43008001 LOUISE AV 195' S/0 VICTORY BL 18 57% 76 49308082 NEW HAMPSHIRE AV W/S 400' 24 56% W/0 MELROSE AV 77 39713166 CREBS AND VANOWEN 450' 36 56% UPSTREAM OF 397-13-169. 78 42710069 rruJUNGA AVE/SAT COLLINS AV 15 56% 79 49503014 lAVE 43 500' SEIO FIGUEROA ST. 21 56% 80 52016161 lAMHERST AV AT ALLEY N/0 PICO 24 56% BL 81 53604022 VERMONT AV EIS AT 30TH ST 14 56% 82 42815021 CHANDLER BL AT ETHEL AV 48 55% 83 49505067 S.F. RD W/S AT 400' N/0 HURON 14 55% ST. 84 49214055 SAN VINCENTE BL AT 6TH ST 21 54% 85 42715053 BILOXI AV 27 54% 86 38805133 PIERCE ST 330' SW/0 VARNA AV 21 54% 87 39913052 HAZELTINE AV EIS AT GAULT ST 24 54% 88 42813007 CHANDLER BL 1O' S/0 N/RDWY 42 54% AT CALHOUN AV 89 55702119 AVALON BL EIS 250' N/0 18 54% SLAUSON AV 90 51608130 LOS ANGELES ST E/S 100' S/0 36 54% 3RDST 91 52016164 GRANVILLE AV EIS 2ND MH S/0 30 53% CLAYRESAV 92 53613008 VERNON AV 75' EIO 11TH AV 66 53% 93 53609063 BRONSON AV 150' S/0 41 ST ST 66 53% 94 56102019 MAIN ST 244' N/0 SUNSET AV 48 53% 95 56003108 HAVELOCK AV 218' EIO 15 53% LINDBLADE DR

21 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MHNo. Location Size (in.) d/D

96 46707081 AVE 50 W/S 230' S/0 MENDOTA 12 53% AV. 97 39513114 VANOWEN ST 16' N/0 CL 390' EIO 18 53% SHELTONDALE AV 98 51814001 LA CIENEGA BL W/S 400' N/0 18 53% !VENICE BL 99 51704174 NORMANDIE AV W/S 30' N/0 SAN 27 53% MARINO ST 100 51613046 UNION AV W/S AT 23RD ST 20 53% 101 44307150 LANKERSHIM BL 320' N/0 VALLEY 24 53% SPRING LANE 102 49316104 BERENDO ST S/0 5TH ST 20 52% 103 61306052 GULF AV 300' S/0 M ST 18 52% 104 51704146 9TH ST AND BERENDO 18 52% 105 53703007 GRIFFITH AVAT 15TH ST 40 52% 106 51805165 SHENANDOAH ST EIS 460' N/0 42 52% 18TH ST 107 38805021 PIERCE ST BTWN STANWIN AV 18 52% ~ND ARLETA AV 108 51705024 11TH ST 8' S/0 CL 1ST MH EIO 45 51% LUCERNE BL 109 44305264 VALLEY SPRING LN N/S 25' EIO 48 51% BECK AV 110 42813015 CHANDLER BL 1O' S/0 N/RDWY 54 51% ~30' W/0 RANCHITO AV 111 44305072 WOODBRIDGE ST 150 FT W/0 48 51% RADFORD AVE 112 53602148 ~RLINGTON AV W/S 75' S/0 36TH 42 51% PL 113 56504042 !VERMONT AV EIS 1ST MH N/0 27 51% MANCHESTER AV 114 51813160 SHENANDOAHSTW/S130'N/O 48 51% OLIN ST 115 51601061 HOOVER ST AT LEEWARD AV 20 51% 116 49514040 ~VE 17 AT MOZART ST 20 51% 117 49506084 ~VE 33AT POST ST 16 51% 118 51806094 CRESCENT HEIGHTS BL EIS @ 21 51% SATURN ST

22 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%

No. MHNo. Location Size (in.) d/D

119 56102092 BROOKS AV 150' W/0 PACIFIC AV 15 51% 120 44307151 CAHUENGA BL 260' N/0 VALLEY 18 51% SPRING LN

Notes: in.= inches d/D =measured gepth of flow (in.)/pipe Diameter (in.) MH No. = Maintenance Hole Number PDWF = Peak Dry Weather Flow e. Wastewater Capital Improvements

The City expended $225 million in wastewater capital improvement in FY 2004-05, of which $130 million (58 percent) was for collection system improvements. For FY 2005-06, the projected total wastewater capital improvement expenditure is $280.5 million with $160 million (57 percent) designated for the collection system. For the next ten years (FYs 2005-06 through 2014-15), the projected total expenditure is-$3.5 billion with $2.7 billion (77 percent) designated for the collection system.

A complete copy of the latest 10-Year Wastewater Capital Improvements Program is available at http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf. A summary of the Program is provided as Attachment "A" to this Annual Report. f. Sewer Cleaning

A summary of the sewer cleaning program progress is provided in Table 5 and Figure 1 below. As shown, the City complied with all requirements for Year One and exceeded the mandated cleaning of 60,000 pipe reaches by more than 22,000 reaches. Per the provisions of the CSSA, the City is allowed to "bank" the excess pipe reaches cleaned over the required 60,000 pipe reaches. The banked reaches can be used in the future to augment the quantity of sewer cleaning performed if it falls below the required 60,000 pipe reaches. The City is proposing to "bank" 22,030 pipe reaches.

23 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 5: Fiscal Year 2004-05 Sewer Cleaning Data

Number or Length of CSSA Requirement for Compliance Item Pipe Reaches Year One Completed Number of Pipe Reaches 60,000 82,030 Length of Pipe Reaches 2,600 Miles (approx.) 3,699 Miles Proposed Number of Pipe Not Applicable 22,030 Reaches Banked Number of Hot Spot Pipe 35,000 60,873 Reaches Cleaned Length of Hot Spot Pipe Not Applicable 2,745 Miles Reaches

Figure 1: Sewer Cleaning Progress

90,000 82,030 80,000

70,000

,:s 60,000 60,873 ! 60,000 I I 50,000 jf 0 c( u, =Q. u, it 40,000 (,) 35,000 I 0 } I j;_ o 30,000 z "D ·i ! "D c( 20,000 ·s ! U) - U) l g. (,) :- I " 10,000 «!~ J· .· 0 Total No. of Pipe Reaches Cleaned No. of Hot Spot Pipes Cleaned

The City continues to review its sewer maintenance efforts and to adjust the sewer cleaning schedule and cleaning frequencies accordingly. As a result, cleaning goals are established on

24 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

an annual basis to meet revised cleaning needs. The following is an estimated breakdown of the sewer cleaning for FY 2005-06:

• Total Pipe Reaches to be Cleaned as required in the CSSA: 60,000 pipes. However, the City has established an internal goal for cleaning of 90,000 pipe reaches. • Total Hot Spot Pipe Reaches to be Cleaned as required in the CSSA: 35,000 pipes. However, the City has established an internal goal for hot spot cleaning of 60,000 pipe reaches.

g. Sewer Line Televlslon Assessment - Mileage

A summary of the sewer line television assessment is provided in Table 6 below. As shown in Figure 2, the City complied with the requirement of the CSSA, exceeding the mandated inspection goal of 600 miles of pipe by 221 miles. Per the CSSA, the City is allowed to "bank" a percentage of the excess amount over 600 miles to be used in the future to augment the quantity of sewer line television assessment performed if it falls below the 600-mile requirement. The percentage of excess that can be banked is equal to the miles of pipe assessed for the first time divided by the total miles of pipe assessed. The City is proposing to "bank" 196 miles.

Table 6: Televlslon Assessment Overview

CSSA Requirement for Completed in Compliance Item Year One Year One Sewer Pipes Inspected 600 Miles 821 Miles Sewer Pipes Inspected for the Not Applicable 728 Miles First Time Sewer Pipe Inspected for the First Time As Percentage of Not Applicable 87% Total Inspected Inspected Sewer Pipes Not Applicable 196* Miles Proposed to Be Banked

Note:* {196 miles= (821miles -600 miles)*(87%)}

25 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Figure 2: Sewer Line Television Assessment Progress

900 821 800

700 600 ,,,______, Cl) 800 a. ii: 500 '5 (I) :! 400 :E 300

200 ' '-',

100

0 Miles of Sewer Pipe Assessed

h. Sewer Line Television Assessment - Condition Ratings

A summary of the sewer line television assessment findings is provided in Table 6 and Figure 3 below. As shown, 87% of the pipe assessed was found to be condition rating "C" or better.

Table 7: Condition Assessment Results

Pipe Assessed for Total Pipe Condition Condition Percent of the First-Time Assessed Rating Description Total (Miies) (Miles) A Very Good 100 110 13% B Good 323 363 44% c Fair 213 246 30% D Poor 79 86 11% E Emergency 13 16 2% Total 728 821 100%

26 Collection System ~ettlement Agreement (CSSA} Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Figure 3: Condition Assessment Results

400· 363 350

300 246 j 250

j 200 0 ~ 150 110 100 - AR

50 - 16 0 I I A B c D E Condition Ratings

Condition "E" sewers are referred to the Bureau of Engineering for immediate emergency repair. In FY 2004-05, 514 emergency sewer work requests were authorized and completed, requiring more than $20 million. This is equivalent to approximately 12 miles of sewers repaired during FY 2004-05. Projects to repair, rehabilitate, and/or replace Condition "D" sewers are scoped and then placed in the City's Wastewater Capital Improvements Program.

I. Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG} Control Program.

As summarized in Table 8 below, the City continues to implement its FOG Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response Guide (ERP/ERG). These procedures include permitting of FSEs, investigating referrals from Wastewater Collection System Division (WCSD), and taking enforcement actions against noncompliance. The ERP/ERG includes activities such as issuing Notices of Violation (NOVs), taking enforcement actions, and requiring grease interceptor installations.

Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results

Total for Summary of Weekly FOG Reports FY 04-05 CSSA Summary FY 04-05 Permitted Food Service Establishment (FSE) as of 7/1/2004 7,832 FSEs Inspected - Annual Inspections Conducted 7,832

27 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results

Total for Summary of Weekly FOG Reports FY 04-05 % Completed 100

Inspection Activity Summary Total Inspections of FSEs 15,002

Notice of Violation (NOV) Activity Summary Total NOVs Issued 944 NOVs Forwarded for Enforcement 462

Enforcement Case Summary Active Cases as of 6/30/2005 106 Completed Cases 462 Total Enforcement Cases Processed 568

Wastewater Collections System Division (WCSD) Referrals Summary Received 142 Investigated 142 FSEs Identified as Source of FOG Blockage - See Table 1.2 0 FSEs Issued NOV during Investigation - See Table 1.2 11 FSEs with an Enforcement Case-See Table 1.2 4 FSEs Ordered to Install Grease Interceptor - See Table 1.2 1

Conditional Waivers Processed Granted 0 Revoked 0 Denied 0

Modifications to the SOPs, ERP/ERG, and implementation of Conditional Waivers were pending Government Plaintiffs' approval of implementation plans presented in ''The FOG Report," as required by Paragraph 59 of the CSSA, and submitted to the Plaintiffs on April 22, 2005. The approval was granted on September 29, 2005.

One of the SOPs that the City implements as part of the FOG Control Program is that of conducting a field investigation of each referral from WCSD. When an investigation reveals noncompliance with the FOG Ordinance, the City activates its ERP/ERG. Table 9 identifies the City's ERP/ERG activities resulting from field investigations of WCSD referrals and names the FSEs affected.

28 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 9: Referral Investigation Summary

FSEs Identified as Source of FOG Blockage

None

FSEs Issued Notice of Violation {NOVl During Investigation

1. Acapulco Restaurant #53, 750 Sampson Way, San Pedro 2. BBQ Unlimited, 12980 Sherman Way, North Hollywood 3. Fay's Foods, 10650 Burbank Blvd., North Hollywood 4. Flores Meat Market, 1200 W. Anaheim St., Wilmington 5. Hop Li Sea Food, 10974 W. Pico, Los Angeles 6. Jack in the Box #292, 4210 Crenshaw Blvd., Los Angeles 7. KFC #x610126, 8515 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles 8. La Perla Blanca Seafood, 5400 S. Avalon Blvd., Los Angeles 9. M & M Soul Foods, 3552 W. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Los Angeles 10. Mount Carmel Treatment Center, 801 W. 70th St. Los Angeles 11. Tommy's Burgers #1, 137 E. Anaheim St., Wilmington

FSEs with an Enforcement Case

1. Hop Li Sea Food, 10974 W. Pico, Los Angeles 2. BBQ Unlimited, 12980 Sherman Way, North Hollywood 3. M & M Soul Foods, 3552 W. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Los Angeles 4. KFC #x610126, 8515 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles

FSEs Ordered to Install Grease lnterceetor

1. KFC #x610126, 8515 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles

Since the inception of the FOG Control Program in 2001 and the enhanced sewer cleaning and public outreach, FOG-caused SSOs were reduced by over 80 percent, as shown in Figure 4.

29 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Figure 4: FOG-Related SSOs by Fiscal Year

300 ?an

250 ~

:! 197 'a. 200 ,----- U) Baseline 174 Year I 79% ~ - ~ 150 ------· 32% from Reduction 117 Baseline from 40% Year 0~ 100 ,--- - Baseline - Reduction r--- Year from =It Baseline 60% 62 Year Reduction from 50 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Baseline Year

0 2000..()1 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Fiscal Year

i. Primary and Secondary Basin Plans

The CSSA requires completion of all 25 Primary Sewer Plans by the end of Year Five. Eight plans are currently in progress, including the Lincoln Heights Primary Sewer Plan, which is 95 percent complete. The remaining seven plans are all more than 50 percent complete. The City has prepared a completion plan and schedule for the Primary Sewer Basin Plans. A summary of the current status of each is provided in Table 10. A map showing the locations of the 25 basins is provided as Figure 5.

Table 1O: Status of Primary Sewer Plans

Primary Sewer Plan Projected Current Status ComDletion Date 1. Lincoln Heights Primary Sewer Plan November 2005 95% Complete 2. Venice Primary Sewer Plan January 2006 80% Complete 3. Northridge Primary Sewer Plan March 2006 80% Complete 4. Tarzana Primary Sewer Plan April 2006 75% Complete 5. Baldwin Hills Primary Sewer Plan June2006 75% Complete

30 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 10: Status of Primary Sewer Plans

Primary Sewer Plan Projected Current Status ComDletlon Date 6. Granada Hills Primary Sewer Plan June2006 75% Complete 7. Central City Primary Sewer Plan July2006 50% Complete 8. NOHO Primary Sewer Plan July2006 50% Complete 9. Highland Park Primary Sewer Plan September 2006 Scheduled for future years. 10. Wilshire Primary Sewer Plan December 2006 Scheduled for future years. 11. CBD Primary Sewer Plan March 2007 Scheduled for future years. 12. Boyle Heights Primary Sewer Plan March 2007 Scheduled for future years. 13. West LA Primary Sewer Plan March 2007 Scheduled for future years. 14. Hollywood Primary Sewer Plan March 2007 Scheduled for future years. 15. N.E. Wilshire Primary Sewer Plan March 2007 Scheduled for future years. 16. South LA Primary Sewer Plan May2007 Scheduled for future years. 17. Encino Primary Sewer Plan December 2007 Scheduled for future years. 18. Pacoima Primary Sewer Plan February 2008 Scheduled for future years. 19. Westchester Primary Sewer Plan February 2008 Scheduled for future years. 20. Brentwood Primary Sewer Plan March 2008 Scheduled for future years. 21. Wilmington Primary Sewer Plan March 2008 Scheduled for future years. 22. San Pedro Primary Sewer Plan March 2008 Scheduled for future years. 23. Woodland Hills Primary Sewer Plan May2008 Scheduled for future years. 24. Van Nuys Primary Sewer Plan December 2008 Scheduled for future years. 25. Chatsworth Primary Sewer Plan March 2009 Scheduled for future years.

31 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.)

32 Primary Basin Plans in Progress

D Baldwin Hills (78%) D Granada Hills/Mission Hills (75%) D North Hollywood/Sunland (50%) CJ Northrldge (80%) D Tarzana (80%) D Venice (80%) CJ Lincoln Heights (95%) Figure 5

GISGroup Wastewater Engineering Services Divsion Bureau of Sanitation City of Los Angeles

Created September 14, 2005

0 1 2 4 6 8 •-E:Jwm::::1111••c::=:::::1•••Miles S:\glsuniN>projecls\sewershedmaps\stalu8\PrlmaryPlannlngStatus.mxd Thomas Broe Data reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS MAP Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.)

34 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

The CSSA requires Secondary Basin Plans for the 100 highest priority basins to be completed by the end of Year Ten of the CSSA. To date, a total of nine Secondary Basin Plans have been completed, as shown in Table 11. Current projections are to complete an additional 12 Plans by the end of FY 2005-06. Figure 6 shows the locations of the secondary basins with completed Plans.

Table 11: Completed Secondary Basin Plans

Plan Name Completion Sewer Miles in Sewer Miles Date Basin Identified for Renewal

Secondary Sewer Basin 5/11/05 40.3 5.2 Plan for Basin 802 Secondary Sewer Basin 5/24/05 27.7 6.8 Plan for Basin H27 Secondary Sewer Basin 5/25/05 9.1 3.4 Plan for Basin C04 Secondary Sewer Basin 5/27/05 20.6 5.5 Plan for Basin U04 Secondary Sewer Basin 7/6/05 14.5 4.4 Plan for Basin P03 Secondary Sewer Basin 8/3/05 45.1 10.7 Plan for Basin H30 Secondary Sewer Basin 8/10/05 24.3 9.5 Plan for Basin H32 Secondary Sewer Basin 9/21/05 39.0 17.0 Plan for Basin H28 Secondary Sewer Basin 9/28/05 44.1 9.8 Plan for Basin A02

35 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.)

36 Secondary Sewershed Plans Completed

LJAD2 LJC04 LJH27 LJH28 LJH30 LJH32 LJP03 Oso2 Figure 6 LJU04 GIS Group Wastewater Engineering SelVices DMslon Bureau of Sanitation City of Los Angeles

Created September 14, 2005

OIIIC~1-=211111... 4====~6 ...... 8MD•

(This page was intentionally left blank.)

38 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Figure 8: Root-Caused SSOs

350

300 290

! 250 ..'>A I First Year of 200 Root Control ! Program i 19% Reduction 137 8 150 from First Year ....0:: of Program o 100 ~ 53% Reduction "" from First Year of Program 50 ~

0 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Fiscal Year

m. Significant Program Implementation

A summary of other significant program modifications and achievements made during the FY 2004-05 that affect compliance with the CSSA requirements is provided herein.

On February 2, 2005, following an extensive public outreach campaign that included more than 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the CSSA and the necessary rate increase, the City Council authorized the necessary sewer rate increase over the next five years to provide the necessary resources. On June 7, 2005, the City Council authorized an additional 21 staff to support the implementation of the CSSA in the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation. Representatives from the Department of Public Works and other City offices continue to meet monthly as part of the Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) to review and track progress and coordinate activities. Quarterly updates are given to the Board of Public Works. The City is currently launching a root control outreach and education program for private properties. The focus will be on areas where private laterals are prone to root intrusion and as evidenced by sewer television inspection. The City has implemented state-of-the-art field automation of our sewer maintenance trucks (FAST). All maintenance equipment is now equipped with an on-board computer with sewer information, work orders, etc. This has facilitated and streamlined work, as

40 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

k. MOUSE Model

As requested, "R" factors for all MOUSE model basins were developed based on historical rainfall and sewer flow data. A report on the "R" factors was submitted on April 29, 2005. The City will continue its wet-weather calibration and validation of the "R" factors as additional data is collected.

I. Chemical Root Control

The City continues its proactive root control program. A total of 11,608 pipes or 474 miles of root-infested sewers were chemically treated with root inhibitors. As shown in Figure 7, this corresponds to more than 3 times the CSSA requirement of 150 miles per year. Over the last two years alone, sewer overflows caused by roots were reduced by 53 percent (Figure 8).

Figure 7: Root Control Progress

500 ~·~

450

400

360

!. 300 Q. 0 250

I 200 i 150 150 T 100 Required 50 byCSSA

0 Miles of Pipe Treated with Root-Control Chemicals

39 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

evidenced by a reduction in response time and increased productivity demonstrated by the sewer maintenance crews. In an effort to improve communications and facilitate the timely completion of the CSSA deliverables, the City's Bureau of Contract Administration is reorganizing its sewer construction inspection staff. The plan will move sewer projects currently managed by three divisions and combine them under one division - the Wastewater Construction Division. The Emergency Sewer Repair Group was transferred to the Wastewater Construction Division. In an effort to ensure the availability of adequate resources in the construction community, the City is working closely with the Engineering Contractors Association (ECA), which represents many of the sewer contractors in the area. The ECA contractors felt confident that they could deliver the anticipated sewer repair and rehabilitation workload. The City and ECA agreed to meet on a semi-annual basis to review progress and coordinate activities. The City is currently evaluating various options to streamline the contracting process to expedite the bid and award of projects, including pre-qualification of contractors that will be bidding on sewer projects. The City's Bureau of Engineering has undergone necessary reorganization to accommodate the construction of the CSSA-required projects. A new construction division named the Wastewater Conveyance Construction Division (WCCD) was created and staffed for the construction management of sewer projects. The City's Bureau of Engineering has implemented a design tool called the Sewer Management Automated Repair Tracking System (SMARTS). SMARTS functions as a one-stop shop of information for Secondary Sewer Renewal Program (SSRP) engineers, using mapping resources and GIS technology to help engineers deliver design projects faster, more accurately, and more efficiently. SMARTS allows sewer information to be rendered on top of City base map components like parcels, streets, and freeways to better represent the location of damaged pipe. In addition, SMARTS renders data relating to condition assessment, sewer wyes, storm drains, substructures, aerial photographs, and existing projects to help engineers identify other factors critical to the sewer repair. n. Failure to Comply Proiects

The City has complied with all requirements of the CSSA for Year One. o. Odor Outreach Plan

As required by Section V-G (Paragraphs 34 and 36) of the CSSA, the City is required to update the Odor Outreach Plan for advertising the Sewer Odor Hotline and report progress on the implementation of the updated Odor Outreach Plan. A summary of the progress to date is provided herein.

The Draft Odor Hotline Publicity Outreach Plan, hereafter referred to as the Draft Outreach Plan, was developed and copies were provided to the Odor Advisory Board. The Odor Advisory Board input and comments as stated in the Board's meeting minutes over the last

41 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

two years were reviewed and incorporated into the Draft Outreach Plan. The Draft Outreach Plan was presented to the Odor Advisory Board at its meeting of March 14, 2005. The issue of effective outreach was discussed at length and the Board's comments were incorporated. The Final Odor Hotline Publicity Outreach Plan was submitted on April 27, 2005.

The City designed magnets and flyers that include updated contact and reporting procedures for both 3-1-1 and the Odor Hotline in both English and Spanish. The City ordered and received 1,500 magnets and is printing 5,000 flyers for distribution starting in October 2005. Meanwhile, the City is using various outreach materials that contain Odor Hotline information to inform the residents at many public events or meetings, including the following:

Boyle Heights 3rd Annual Resource Fair Southeast LA Awareness Walk Community Outreach Event Film Arts Community Outreach Event 2004 Coastal Bay Clean-up Event Solid Resources Collection North Central Yard Open House Event Solid Resources Collection South LA Yard Open House Event Solid Resources Collection West LA Yard Open House Event Neighborhood Clean Up event at Green Meadow Recreation Center Studio City Residents Association Presentation on the City of Los Angeles' Odor Control Effort Winnetka Neighborhood Council-Public Works Committee Tarzana Neighborhood Council Meeting Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council Meeting p. Odor Control Facilities Construction Progress

A summary of the construction status of the odor control facilities is provided in Table 12.

42 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Title Construction Project Status Comments (Yes or No) End Date Air Treatment Facllity (ATF) - 5123/08 No On Schedule ECIS/NORS Mission & Jesse No On Schedule Design is 75% complete. Design is 100% complete. Cu"ently In bid and 23d & San Pedro No On Schedule award. Jefferson Siphon No On Schedule Design is 90% complete. NORS Connection No On Schedule Design is 90% complete. ATF-NCOS 5/23/08 No On Schedule Design is 100% complete. Cu"ent/y In bid and Jefferson & Rodeo No On Schedule award. ATF-NEIS 3/26/09 No On Schedule Humboldt No On Schedule Design is 60% complete. Richmond No On Schedule Design is 60% complete. Interim Carbon Scrubber- Yes Completed NCOS Interim Carbon Scrubber - 8/27/04 Yes Completed ECIS/NORS Mission & Jesse Yes Completed 8126/04 Completed 1 day ahead of schedule. 23'1 & San Pedro Yes Completed 8126104 Completed 1 day ahead of schedule. Jefferson Siphon Yes Completed 8126104 Completed 1 day ahead of schedule.

43 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities

I I Shaded items indicate completed projects.

CSSA Completed? Project Title Construction Project Status Comments (Yes or No) End Date NORS Connection Yes Completed 8/27104 Completed 1 day ahead of schedule. An additional carbon scrubber was Installed at Interim Carbon Scrubber - 10/30/06 No On Schedule the Division Street site and placed In service on NEIS May 27, 2005. Humboldt No On Schedule Construction is 70% complete. Richmond No On Schedule Construction is 70% complete.

44 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program

The Final Report prepared by the designated independent review consultant issued in March 2004 included 16 recommendations in section 9.2 of the report. The City prepared the Draft "Responses to the Recommendations from Independent Review of the City of Los Angeles's Sewer Odor Control Program." The responses were presented to the Odor Advisory Board at its meeting of March 14, 2005. These recommendations were discussed at length at the meeting and the Board's comments were incorporated into the Final Report issued on April 27, 2005.

Table 13 provides the status of the 16 recommendations from the independent consultant report.

Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations

Number Recommendation Status 1 Conduct •before and after- monitoring of COMPLETED • •Before and after- ECIS on headspace pressures in both the north line pressure tests were conducted between and south branches of the NOS. April and October 2004. 2 If headspace pressures in the "Maze• NEEDS FURTHER EVALUATION • After the NOS are not sufficiently reduced to construction of "SlausonNanNess/COS prevent widespread odor releases, External Bypass• project, the City will proceed with the siting and design of air conduct another pressure test in the S. extraction/treatment systems. Maze. Based on results of the testing, the City will decide whether the odor releases have been controlled or if further action is required. 3 Proceed with the full scale testing of NOT APPLICABLE • The City proceeds with continuous magnesium hydroxide the application of magnesium hydroxide; addition to reduce the intensity of odors therefore, testing is not needed. emitted from the south branch of the NOS. 4 Increase the design air flows for ATFs COMPLETED. 5 Monitor wastewater characteristics and COMPLETED. headspace H~ and pressure levels in major interceptors outside the "Maze.• 6 Expand the odor hotline and complaint COMPLETED. database to all areas of the City. 7 Evaluate the feasibility of routing all odor COMPLETED. complaints through the odor hotline.

45 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations

Number Recommendation Status 8 Maintain a sewer odor advisory board ONGOING • During FY 2004-05, the Odor with representatives from various sectors Advisory Board conducted five meetings on of the City affected by sewer odors. Nov. 8 and Dec. 12, 2004; and Jan. 10, Mar. 14, and May 9, 2005. 9 The Odor Advisory Board should prepare NOT APPLICABLE TO THE CITY. a report that summarizes its accomplishments, conclusions, and recommendations. 10 Strive to become a center of excellence The City continues to work with experts in in the field of sulfide odor and corrosion the odor field. In April 2004, the City research, working with local universities, presented the topic "Los Angeles Selects experts in the field, and such Bio-Trickling/ Activated Carbon for Collection organizations as the Water Environment System• at the Water Environment Research Foundation. Federation/Air & Wastewater Management Association (WEF/WMA). The presentation was subsequently selected as one of the best at this conference and the City was invited to be on the panel for the American Water Works Association Conference in June 2004. The City is also joining CH2MHill in proposing to support the Water Environment Research Foundation research project, "Prevention and Minimization of Odors and Related Corrosion in Collections Systems". This project will examine the effectiveness of odor mitigation strategies that have been used to minimize odors and reduce corrosion within collection system. 11 Meet regularly with County Sanitation The City prefers to share/exchange Districts of Los Angeles County and the information on odor/corrosion control Orange County Sanitation District. strategies with other agencies, but in the forum of ad hoc meetings and discussions. 12 Change the design criteria of the Sewer COMPLETED. Design Manual to flow 50 percent full. 13 Research the adequacy of current design The work plan for the siphon air jumpers guidelines for air jumpers. research will be recommended in the Odor Master Plan.

46 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 14: Summary of Progress on SEPs

Name Project Description Status Eligible Costs North Atwater Creek Construct water quality improvements to an The draft work plan was submitted to the $70,300 Restoration & Water Quality area along the Los Angeles (LA) River in Regional Water Quality Control Board on Enhancement Project the vicinity of North Atwater Park. August 30, 2005 for review prior to proceeding with design. Additional information on this project is provided in Attachment C. South Los Angeles Storm Construct an advanced system for capture The work plan is scheduled for None Water Treatment Project at and treatment of urban runoff. completion in August 2007. The work 54th and Avalon St. plan may be expedited based on the availability of additional funding. Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restore and enhance a one-half-mile reach Seeking community and LARWQCB input None Restoration Project of the Hazard Creek corridor and 2.5 acres to develop project work plan. The work of wetlands habitat in the Lincoln Heights plan is scheduled for completion in March area of Los Angeles. 2006. Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution Address high bacteria levels at Inner Awaiting test results of a wave generator None Control and Water Circulation Cabrillo Beach. machine at Dana Point Harbor to reduce Enhancement Project bacteria count in the water. The work plan is scheduled for completion in August 2008. Downtown Los Angeles Construct a storm drain low-flow diversion The site has been selected. The work None Storm Drain Low-Flow structure to divert low flow from a storm plan is scheduled for completion in Diversion Project drain in the Downtown Los Angeles area August 2009. that discharges to the LA River.

48 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations

Number Recommendation Status 14 Re-evaluate the design of gas trap Inventory of the trap maintenance hole maintenance holes. structures was conducted. Crew interviews will be conducted to see if there is an existing structure type that the City owns and operates that is more reliable and requires less maintenance than the currently standard design in use. 15 & 16 Create an Odor Control Section with COMPLETED. adequate staff. r. Annual Supplemental Environmental Proiects (SEPs) Status Report

As required in Section VIII, Paragraph 94 of the CSSA, the following is a status report on each Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) for which a SEP Completion Report has not been submitted. The project status and a list of eligible SEP costs for each Tier 1 SEP are provided below in Table 14. In addition, a detailed update on the North Atwater Creek Restoration is provided as Attachment C.

47 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

ATTACHMENT A

WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY*

* The City's Wastewater Capital Improvement Program (WCIP) is currently undergoing its annual review and update. A complete copy of the City's current 10-year (FYs 2005-06 through 2014-15) WCIP is available at http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf. Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.) WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND 10-YEAR EXPENDITURE PLAN

(FISCAL YEARS 2005/08 - 2014/15)

CATEGORIES: » COLLECTION SYSTEM » DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT » EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY » HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT » LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT » PUMPING PLANTS » SYSTEMWIDE » TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT MAYOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA

COUNCIL MEMBERS 1ST DISTRICT 4TH DISTRICT 7TH DISTRICT 1OTH DISTRICT 13TH DISTRICT ED REYES TOM LABONGE ALEX PADILLA VACANT ERIC GARCETTI

2ND DISTRICT 5TH DISTRICT 8TH DISTRICT 11 TH DISTRICT 14TH DISTRICT WENDY GREUEL JACK WEISS BERNARD PARKS BILL ROSENDAHL VACANT

3RD DISTRICT 6TH DISTRICT 9TH DISTRICT 12TH DISTRICT 15TH DISTRICT DENNIS P. ZINE TONY CARDENAS JAN PERRY GREIG SMITH JANICE HAHN

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS CYNTHIA M. RUIZ, PRESIDENT DAVID SICKLER, VICE PRESIDENT PAULA A. DANIELS, PRESIDENT PRO-TEM VALERIE LYNNE SHAW, COMMISSIONER YOLANDA FUENTES, COMMISSIONER

BUREAU OF SANITATION BUREAU OF ENGINEERING RITA L. ROBINSON - DIRECTOR GARY LEE MOORE, P.E. - CITY ENGINEER D.C.TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DIVISION WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE ENGINEERING DIVISION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT INFORMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS DIVISION BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION LOS ANGELES-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT JOHN L. REAMER, JR. - INSPECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS DIVISION WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION MAYOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA

COUNCIL MEMBERS 1ST DISTRICT 4TH DISTRICT 7TH DISTRICT 1OTH DISTRICT 13TH DISTRICT ED REYES TOM LABONGE ALEX PADILLA VACANT ERIC GARCETTI

2ND DISTRICT 5TH DISTRICT 8TH DISTRICT 11TH DISTRICT 14TH DISTRICT WENDY GREUEL JACK WEISS BERNARD PARKS BILL ROSENDAHL VACANT

3RD DISTRICT 6TH DISTRICT 9TH DISTRICT 12TH DISTRICT 15TH DISTRICT DENNIS P. ZINE TONY CARDENAS JAN PERRY GREIG SMITH JANICE HAHN

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS CYNTHIA M. RUIZ, PRESIDENT DAVID SICKLER, VICE PRESIDENT PAULA A. DANIELS, PRESIDENT PRO-TEM VALERIE LYNNE SHAW, COMMISSIONER YOLANDA FUENTES, COMMISSIONER

PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2"dYear 3n1 Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year 9th Year 10thYear CATEGORY j 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEMS 134,533,003 193, 777,687 238,486,437 282,731,445 366,926,931 340,658,315 355,118,341 286,484,362 221,382,215 224, 770,211 D. C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT 37,429,010 42,468,436 10,982,060 3,555,893 3,539,873 666,667 99,999 33,333 0 0 EARTHQUAKE (ASRP) 18,000,000 10,900,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT 38,716,901 69,811,933 92,829,258 54,349,256 34,232,129 18,372,700 10,431,140 9,998,840 48,520 0 LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT 6,337,342 2,871,898 4,454,560 3,371,667 3,502,707 513,853 50,000 16,667 0 0 PUMPING PLANTS 5,817,425 828,740 6,816,460 20,094,180 13,751,820 0 0 0 0 0 SYSTEM WIDE 23,102,256 12,075,532 13,945,863 5,844,663 5,477,963 31,805,663 31,805,663 31,755,663 31,607,663 27,611,663 TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT 16,660,052 13,719,947 5,618,212 5,737,970 2,898,709 28,366,220 27,853,500 18,301,080 12,600,000 0

TOTALWCIP 280,595,989 346,454, 173 377,132,850 375,685,074 430,330, 132 420,383,418 425,358,643 346,589,945 265,638,398 252,381,874

Page 1 July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005106 • 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

CS PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2"dYear 3r11Year 4lh Year 5th Year 6111 Year T"Year 8th Year 9th Year 10th Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 4TH AVENUE SLAUSON SWR REHAB 0 331,060 456,940 495,000 8,470,850 7,702,010 54,880 0 0 0 4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR REHAB 461,320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6TH ST ABANDN DIV TO NOS 24, 100 124,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9TH BERENDO NORMANDIE SWR RLF 0 0 0 138,120 149,720 697,370 1,322,330 45,540 0 0 12TH HILL SWR REHAB 1,016,480 2,053,840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29TH CONGRESS RLF SWR 0 0 0 0 124,920 179,000 2,290,420 1,388,740 960 0 71ST AVALON SWR REHAB 0 0 157,080 163,640 1,368,238 2,289,042 9,760 0 0 0 ADAMS BL RELIEF SEWER 543,600 525,960 14,952,725 4,583,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TREATMENT EQUIP BIOTRICK 787,190 338,620 222,480 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TREATMENT FAC ECIS 12,437,720 8,842,410 2,137,830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TREATMENT FAC NCOS SIPHON 4,935,680 3,713,680 855,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TREATMENT FAC NEIS 400,320 8,093,500 6,637,940 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIR TREATMENT FAC NORS 2, 183,000 3,741,120 1,918,680 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALVARADO CRANDALL RLF SWR 320,000 4,918,000 1,814,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPLE ST RLF SWR 0 0 0 0 73,360 76,460 867,660 0 0 0 ARLINGTON RELIEF SEWER 306,906 5,680 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ASSESSMENT ACT SWRS 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000 464,000

AVE 45 ARROYO DR RLF SWR 939,860 12,821,870 17,399,890 17,352,385 4,949, 195 0 0 0 0 0 BALDWIN HILLS AREA SWR REHAB 97,260 140,240 1,017,620 1,849,900 10,400 0 0 0 0 0 BAYWOOD BNDCT ESMT SWR 1,439,720 1, 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BEACHWOOD CANYON MH ADDmON 161,260 369,480 128,520 1,292,570 1,847,735 1,847,735 602,800 0 0 0

Page3 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

18TYear 2"dYear 3n1Year 4"'Year 5"'Year 6th Year 7th Year 8111 Year 9th Year 10a. Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006107 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUCHANAN RELIEF SEWER 136, 720 134,880 1,162,414 715,566 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUCKINGHAM DIVR SWR 3,293,300 20,450 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL AREA CSRP U·3 & U-4 945,600 169, 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-5 649,440 2,240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRALAREACSRPU~ 0 16,080 1,378,636 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL BUS DST RLF SWR PH-5 0 0 105,560 368,900 368,900 2,372,200 7,965,180 3,880,840 21,920 0 COLL SYS ADV PLANNING (BOS) 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,600,000 1,450,000 300,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 COS REHAB MARKET ST TO RODEO 0 454,360 1,824,480 1,666,600 1,620,720 18,070,995 18,120,562 17,697,323 211,120 0 COS REHAB NORS DIV 4 TO MARKET 2,150,000 1,080,000 400,000 18,963,600 14,445,760 1,220,720 0 0 0 0 EAGLE ROCK INTER SWR 6,309,719 104,080 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST LA AREA PRIM SWR REHAB 88,740 88,920 413,218 1,525,030 1, 172, 172 10,320 0 0 0 0 EMERGENCY SEWER REPLACEMENT 9,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 6,060,000 ENTERPRISE ST SIPHON MOD 165,800 331,590 1,175,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EXPOSmON BL SWR REHAB 0 0 130,520 192,800 834,520 1,740,120 9, 120 0 0 0 FIGUEROA MERIDIAN YORK RLF SWR 103,000 107,000 688,814 1,078,486 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIGUEROA ST SWR REPLC 0 0 18,900 197,900 237,440 1,596,660 2,979,970 725, 170 0 0 FLINT AVE G ST SWR REPLC 407,005 960 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLORENCE AV SWR REHAB 386,340 6,328,500 10,222,020 3,372,720 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLOW MON REAL TIME & SCADA INT 393,440 499,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLOW MON REAL TIME-PILOT STUDY 51,160 48,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO SWR 3,150,000 398,760 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GLENDALE-BURBANK IN SWR (GBIS) 302,400 2,121,320 3,660,500 7,660,500 5,830,080 13,217,937 43,894,382 43,790,415 43,790,415 31,626, 111 HARBOR AREA CSRP U·1 586,260 803,020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page4 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

18 TYear 21111 Year 3"'Year 4111 Year 5t11Year 6111 Year 7111 Year am Year 9t11Year 10t11Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 HARBOR AREA CSRP U·3 1,358,280 1,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HARBOR AREA CSRP U-4 49,280 1,705,060 5,840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HARBOR AREA CSRP U-6 295,986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HARBOR CSRP U·5 & WILM U-20 1,544,546 814,934 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGHLAND PK EAGLE ROCK SWR RHB 0 0 0 0 0 156,460 134,960 1,855,600 1,752,100 5,600 HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U-2 1,891,467 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM SWR REHAB 576,171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOOVER ST SWR REHAB 1,055,000 665,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR REPLC 558,906 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LCIS REHAB & RELOC RODEO BLKWR 796,876 5,476,860 5,491,724 1,525,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 LCIS REHAB BLACKWELDER MELROSE 0 650,900 1,316,280 1,219,800 13,641,840 19,908,780 16,578,700 55,520 0 0 LINCOLN 83RD SWR REPLC 459,236 248,744 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAINTENANCE HOLE RESETTING 770,000 810,000 860,000 890,000 950,000 990,000 1,030,000 1,070,000 1, 110,000 1,150,000 MANCHESTER CENTRAi. & AVALON 110,360 171,760 1,366,150 2,358,190 9,520 0 0 0 0 0 MANHATTAN 4TH SWR REHAB 0 6,880 56,380 68, 168 299, 112 1, 120 0 0 0 0 MID NOS REHAB (U2) SANTEE ST 0 89,420 808,860 1,259,960 1,063,620 20,387,195 14,991,725 0 0 0 NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR REPLC 990,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORMANDIE FLORENCE SEWER REPL 5,750,000 8,625,000 2,185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N BROADWAY SWR REHAB 220,000 2,590,000 851,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NHIS CAHUENGA TO LCSFVRS 0 0 0 98,980 345,420 345,420 2,646,340 8,771,600 1,933,200 0 NEIS PH 1 2,900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEIS PH 2 268,800 6,641,440 7,122,040 1,938,140 55,622,695 52,144,775 55,746,658 45,583,272 0 0 NE WILSHIRE AREA CSRP U-3 0 15,440 1,259,600 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page5 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

1'" Year 2"dYear 3n1Year 4111 Year 5a,Year 6111 Year 7111 Year 8"'Year 9111 Year 10U1 Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014115 NE WILSHIRE AREA CSRP U-5 0 41,840 2,314,160 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOS DIV HUMBOLDT AV 18 & SFR 3,191,024 5,368, 167 19,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOS REHAB HTP TO SIPHON 29,909,805 21,911,730 238,880 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOS REHAB HUMBOLDT TO LAG 0 0 556,600 1,295,400 1,295,400 1,295,400 1,003,580 7,595,520 24,328,500 41,254,500 NOS REHAB MAZE PHASE 5 1, 152,250 7,383,250 7,383,250 1,763,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOS REHAB MISSION TO HUMBOLDT 184,500 642,500 642,600 349,200 3,918,600 12,561,300 12,561,400 2,973,500 0 0 NOS REHAB SIPHON TO LCIS JCT 6,484,340 20,223,448 19,415,267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOS REHAB TRINITY 6TH MISSION 303,520 1,059,160 1,062,000 532,480 13,512,850 16,062,900 11,708,090 124,560 0 0 NOS REHAB VAN NESS TO TRINITY 1,284,600 1,711,920 13,590,430 17,426,335 12,670,415 135,520 0 0 0 0 ODOR CTRL • FUTURE 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 ODOR CTRL SIERRA BONITA 815,000 397,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLANNED UPGR REPLC PROG 0 0 0 0 0 36,710,000 81,490,000 81,490,000 81,490,000 81,490,000 RODEO/ARLINGTON SWR MAINT FAC 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN FERNANDO PASADNA SWR REHAB 1,084,724 274,516 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN PEDRO 92ND SWR REPLC 0 16,480 503,420 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN PEDRO CSRP U-4 164,808 702,272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN PEDRO CSRP U-8 22,560 1,113,240 3,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SECONDARY SWR RENEWAL PROG (SSRP) 0 0 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 52,720,000 55,220,000 57,720,000 60,220,000 62,720,000 SEPULVEDA VAL MEADOW RLF SWR 1,811,874 1,757,756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEWER FLOW MONIT UPGR PH 1 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEWER FLOW MONIT UPGR PH 2 447,960 4,060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SLAUSON COMPTON SWR REHAB 0 0 244,580 328,320 307,800 1,916,560 6,981,800 1,540,320 0 0 SLAUSON/FLORENCE DIVR TO COS 1,276,362 725,658 2, 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page6 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005106 -2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

111T Year 2"aYear 3raYear 4th Year 5'"Year &'"Year 7"'Year 8th Year 9'"Year 10'"Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 SOTO PICO SWR REPLC 0 0 0 167,580 579,720 852,300 7,584,460 2,934,160 0 0

SOTO ST GAUGING CHAMBER MOD 102,900 740,460 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB 171,792 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SOUTH LA CSRP U • 1 67,460 1,402,920 742,920 6,480 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP A02 BALDWIN HILLS 0 0 2,176,200 12,192,600 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP C04 ROSE & WASHINGTON 190,000 544,000 3,693,000 4,290,000 9,000 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP COB BRENTWOOD P PALISADES 0 0 0 4,112,460 54,258,580 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP E02 NO HOLLYWOOD SUNLAND 0 0 0 1,794,000 40,735,400 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP H01 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 0 0 250,560 23,074,880 0 0 0 0

SSRP H04 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 0 1,928,700 16,770,100 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H26 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 2,694,600 22,434,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H27A BARHAM & CAHUENGA 228,300 1,448,320 2,040,880 532,300 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H27B CAHUENGA & MELROSE 332,900 5,760 3,400,000 1,226,260 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H27C CAHUENGA & HOLLYWOOD 338, 100 68,080 3,400,000 1,939,960 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H28 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 3,952,800 31,594,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP H30 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 0 2,569,590 23,258,570 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP H32 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 252,450 20,113,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP H35 HOLLYWOOD 0 0 0 0 2,240,640 32,392,720 0 0 0 0 SSRP P03A GOLDEN STATE & 10 FWY 29,900 278,300 1,278,638 2,307,602 10,960 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP P03B SOTO ST & 10 FWY 57,420 533,860 2,452,638 4,425,882 21,200 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP S02A RODEO RD & 52ND ST 349,172 670,539 2,207,254 698,887 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP 8028 LA BREA & CRENSHAW 292,500 775,935 2,553,710 808,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP SC05 LINCOLN & SUNSET 94,840 1,807,120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page7 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)

1srYear 2nd Year 3ra Year 4u,Year 5'"Year 6'"Year 7u,Year 8'"Year 9u,Year 10"'Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 SSRP U04A BEVERLYWOOD & 10 FWY 102,400 292,200 1,988,400 2,310,200 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 SSRP U04B VENICE BLVD & 10 FWY 100,200 287,900 1,959,100 2,275,100 5,000 0 0 0 0 0

SSRP U18 WEST LOS ANGELES 0 0 0 2,006,010 19,310,230 0 0 0 0 0 VAN NUYS SYLMAR SWR REHAB 0 0 77, 180 62,240 526,620 0 0 0 0 0 VERMONT AV SWR REPLC 0 0 162, 780 198,560 178,400 2,108,814 2,764,364 718,282 0 0 VERMONT MANCHSTER SWR REHAB 149,680 987, 140 1,221,960 8,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

VERMONT RLF SWR ECIS-SLAUSON 1,789,920 2,834,240 24,830,851 26,628,215 19,592,134 222,880 0 0 0 0 VERMONT RLF SWR FLOR-SLAUSON 626,800 1,147,600 1,125,600 7,960,633 10,201,845 4,942,322 35,200 0 0 0

VOS WASHINGTON SWR REHAB 165,380 1,723,596 564,904 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WASH FLOWER GRAND SWR REPLC 2,074,820 774,660 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WASH GRIFFITH LB SWR REPLC 22, 720 45,520 46,240 785,720 0 0 0 0 0 0

WASH OXFRD BEACH RLF SWR 63,480 62, 120 69,380 1,178,580 0 0 0 0 0 0

WEST LA INT SWR MH ADDITION 400,252 2,387,528 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WEST LA INT SWR REHAB OVERLAND • BARRY 412,092 412,092 6,341,832 9,665,320 84,000 0 0 0 0 0

WEST LA RLF SWR 0 474,340 849,380 7,496,890 15,404,990 34,400 0 0 0 0 WESTERN 35TH RLF SWR 397,240 4,151,080 5,826,800 60,640 0 0 0 0 0 0

WILMINGTON CSRP U-7 0 828,366 1, 145, 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WILSHIRE AREA JEFF SWR REHAB 247, 760 1,809,660 2,262,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WILSHIRE AREA OLYM SWR REHAB 0 113,100 119,020 91,560 3,415,120 0 0 0 0 0

WILSHIRE AREA SYS SWR REHAB 0 0 104,800 27,840 2,303,580 0 0 0 0 0 WILSHIRE WSTMORELAND SWR REHAB 0 0 45,000 16,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 WORKMAN MOZART INTER SWR 449,400 5,571,336 9,047,508 2,112,336 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL CS 134,533,003 193,777,687 238,486,437 282,731,445 366,926,931 340,658,315 355,118,341 286,484,362 221,382,215 224,770,211

Page8 cs July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005106 • 2014/15 DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (DCT)

DCT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2"dYear 3rc1Year 4t1t Year 5th Year em Year T"Year 8'"Year 9th Year 10th Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 DCT ADDL TERT FILTRATION 7,863,480 5,735,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT CAPITAL EQP REPLC 105,000 210,000 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT CAPITAL STR REPLC PROG 165,000 50,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT CHANNEL 2 CONC REHAB @ PH1 1,129,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT CHANNEL 2 CONC REHAB@ PH2 669,000 1,255,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT DCS REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 33,333 833,333 666,667 99,999 33,333 0 0 DCT DCS STANDARDIZATION 97, 159 55,779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT ELECTRICAL POWER SYS MODS 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT EMERGENCY BACKUP POWER 386,070 3,177,200 1,056,640 22,260 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT FILTER UPGRADE 61,355 166,145 188,380 3,499,540 2,706,540 0 0 0 0 0 DCT IRRIGATION CONY POT WATER 600,000 1,800,000 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT LAB FACILITY 290,600 3,135,905 975,580 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NDN • BLOWER FACILITY 5,672,070 5,992,930 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NDN • BLOWER PROCUREMENT 1,097,997 5,899,999 2,439,030 760 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NDN • CHEMICAL ADD SYSTEM 124,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NDN • EQUIP PROCUREMENT 1,618,559 877,878 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NDN • SEC CLAR SKIM AUTO 436,280 3,176,900 42,310 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NITROGEN REM CONVERSION 14,968,005 6,930,820 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT NITROGEN REMOV CONY SC MODS 219,785 194, 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM 1,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DCT PHASE II BARCREENS REPLC 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 145 DCT July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT {DCT)

1"' Year 2"d Year 3ra Year 4th Year 5'"Year &'"Year 7th Year 8a,Year 9th Year 10'"Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2006/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 OCT PLC REPLACEMENT 80,000 714,000 283,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCT POWER/ENERGY MGMT 0 52,000 255,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCT PREFILTER MIXING IMPR 15,250 43,645 52,120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCT UPGRADE LANDSCAPING 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL OCT 37,429,010 42,468,436 10,982,060 3,555,893 3,539,873 666,667 99,999 33,333 0 0

Page 146 OCT July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (EQ)

EQ PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1..rvear 2"dYear 3rc1vear 4v,Year 5t11vear 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year 9th Year 10th Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 CS EARTHQUAKE REPAIR WORK 18,000,000 10,900,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALEQ 18,000,000 10,900,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 173 EQ July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06-2014/15 HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT (HTP)

HTP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2"dYear 3n1vear 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year 9'"Year PROJECT TITLE 101hYear II 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 HTP 1 & 5 MILE OUTFALL REHAB 0 370,575 576,325 7,276,240 5,700,700 0 0 0 0 0 HTP BIOFILTER TESTING 51,060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP BOILER NO 3 OPTIMIZATION 405,500 238,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP CAPITAL EQP REPLC PROG 2,071,000 2,365,000 1,215,000 1,650,000 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 HTP CAPITAL STR REPLC PROG 614,000 603,650 353,650 150,250 150,250 0 0 0 0 0 HTP CAPITAL UTILITY REPLC PROG 300,000 355,000 360,000 365,000 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 HTP CENTRAL SOLIDS HNDLNG FAC 0 500,000 700,000 6,729,000 23,631,500 17,739,500 0 0 0 0 HTP CLASS A BATCH PROCESS EX 818,280 1,637,420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DCS REPLACEMENT 1,454,220 1,639,966 27,025,152 9,165,460 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG CEN WET CAKE PUMP IMPR 346,553 6,552,464 1,901,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG EXPANSION IMPR 144,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG GAS COMP FAC 826,886 4,843,293 19,542,215 95,948 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG GAS DESULF FAC IMPR 252,590 317,035 3,824,750 2,660, 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG GAS FLARE REPLC 0 248,690 399,200 3,504,680 1,243,020 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG GAS SILOXANE REMOV 585,390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DIG SCREENING FAC SCRUBBER MOD 482,672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP DISMANTLING UNUSED FAC 280,000 4,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS 265,840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP GRIT HANDLING IMPROVEMENT 214,000 4,400,000 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP INFLUENT CHANNEL REHAB 432,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP IPS ODOR CNTRL IMPR 264,904 1,308,640 1,210,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 177 HTP July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT (HTP)

11iTYear 2nc1Year 3ra Year 4UIYear 5th Year &'"Year 7th Year 8t11Year 9'"Year 1ot11 Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 HTP LAG & OCT MONITORING 29,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP LANDSCAPING 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP LIQUID SLUDGE STORAGE FAC 643,000 733,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP LPGH FLAME ARRESTER 206,000 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP ODOR CTRL HDWRKS SYS RPL 144,640 289,554 1,429,835 4,657,319 1,123,108 0 0 0 0 0 HTP ODOR CTRL PRIM SCRUB EXP 4,860,853 572,085 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP ODOR CTRL PRIM SCRUB PROC 2,365,506 538,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP OUTFALLS ASSESSMENT 289,000 1,424,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PARKING STRUCTURE REHAB 308,000 597,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HTP PRIM AND SEC SCUM HANDLING 114,704 564,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PRIM BATT B MOD 13,797,775 19,084,465 1,211,730 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PRIM BATT C MOD 1, 122,974 773,225 15,376,645 17,810,771 2,607 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PRIM POLYMER FACILITY 229,558 932,530 582,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PRIM SLUDGE PREHTR INST 236,660 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP PRIM SOLIDS CENTRIFUGE 987,502 7,376,541 12,519,558 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP REACT NITRGN PURGE SYS 1,141,394 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP REACT SELEC MIXER REMOTE 186,965 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP SEC CLARF EXPANSION 0 0 0 284,428 610,944 633,200 10,431,140 9,998,840 48,520 0

HTP SEC CLARF FLOW MEASUR 977,220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP SERVICE WATER FAC EXP 552,040 3,401,140 1,180,050 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP STANDBY BOILER #4 199,000 1,160,000 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HTP SUBSTATION SEPARATION 455,615 2,447,600 2,212,698 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALHTP 38,716,901 69,811,933 92,829,258 54,349,256 34,232,129 18,372,700 10,431,140 9,998,840 48,520 0

Page 178 HTP July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06-2014/15 LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (LAG)

LAG PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2"d Year 3n1 Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year 9111 Year 10th Year PROJECT TITLE ~ 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 LAG CAPITAL EQUIP REPL PROG 68,000 43,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG DCS REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 16,667 416,667 333,333 50,000 16,667 0 0

LAG ELECTRICAL POWER SYST MODS 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG NDN • BLOWERS MAN SYS 645,800 208,380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG NDN • CHEM ADDmON SYS 298,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG NDN • EQUIP PROCUREMENT 120,954 59,720 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG NITROGEN REMOVAL CONY 2,493,388 2,214,418 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG POWER/ENERGY MGMT IMPL 0 0 206,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG PROCESS PIPING REPLACEMENT 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG PROG LOGIC/DISTRIB CNTRL SYS UPGRADE 2,511,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG SURGE TANKS REPLACEMENT 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAG TERTIARY FILTER REPL 0 96,380 247,880 3,355,000 3,086,040 180,520 0 0 0 0

TOTAL LAG 6,337,342 2,871,898 4,454,560 3,371,667 3,502,707 513,853 50,000 16,667 0 0

Page223 LAG July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014115 PUMPING PLANTS (PP)

PP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2nc1vear 3111 Year 411,Year 511,Year 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year 9t11vear 10u, Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 DACOTAH PP VFD REPL 364,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH PULGA PP639 UPGRADE 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ODOR CONTROL BALLONA CREEK PP 192,344 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ODOR CONTROL DACOTAH PP SCRUBB 175,676 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TEMESCAL CANYON PP634 REHAB 15,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VENICE PP DUAL FORCE MAIN 4,470,720 722,040 6,816,460 20,094,180 13,751,820 0 0 0 0 0 VENICE PP HIGH RES GROUNDING 26,085 106, 700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VENICE PP SLUICE GATE REPLC 448,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL PP 5,817,425 828,740 6,816,460 20,094,180 13,751,820 0 0 0 0 0

Page237 pp July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 SYSTEMWIDE (SW)

SW PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2m1Year 3r11Year 4u,Year Su.Year 6u,Year 7111 Year 8111 Year 9u,Year 10u, Year ~ PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BALBOA LAKE IMPRV PH 2 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COLL SYS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SEPs 0 500,000 1,050,000 1,150,000 1,250,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,150,000 1,000,000 0 COMM INVLVMNT & PROJ MmGAT 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT 4,850,000 4,850,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 0

DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 661,585 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EMD LIMS REPLACEMENT 360,000 910,000 230,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EQP UPGR/REPLC TREATMENT PLANT 0 0 0 0 0 26,700,000 26,700,000 26,700,000 26,700,000 26,700,000 GREEN ACRES CERP 60,000 455,000 330,000 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 HTP S.A.F.E. COLLECTION CENTER 422,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J G & ADMIN BLD CCTV REPL 161,377 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JG CODE IMPROV 196,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JGCSRP 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 J G IRRIGATION 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J G KAWANA PAVILION 687,500 229,500 6,732,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J G SHOIN BLD IMPR 97,900 150,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT 636,000 350,000 71,000 440,000 314,300 0 0 0 0 0 LAG S.A.F.E. COLLECTION CENTER 351,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OPEN SYSTEMS WAN 386,000 46,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCADA REPLACEMENT FOR WCSD 644,800 344,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SMURRF 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663 161,663

TA·PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page247 SW July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005106 • 2014/15 SYSTEMWIDE (SW)

1STYear 2"dYear 3rc1Year 4tttYear 5tttYear 6th Year 7tnYear 8U!Year 9th Year 10tnYear PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 VIDEO CONFERENCING IMPLEMENTAT 39,931 138,069 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCSD CCTV STORAGE CABINETS 58,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCSD YARD CLARIFIER INSTALLS 402,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WISARD REPLACEMENT 1,100,000 600,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW COLLECTION YARD IMPR 2,450,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW FACILITIES PLAN 989,000 682,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW NETWORK SERVERS CERP 501,500 218,000 129,200 141,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW SYS FINANCIAL CNSLT (BONDS) 250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 WW SYSTEM AUDITOR 40,000 40,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 44,000 44,000 44,000 46,000 50,000 ZOO DRAINAGE FACILITY 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL SW 23,102,256 12,075,532 13,945,863 5,844,663 5,477,963 31,805,663 31,805,663 31,755,663 31,607,663 27,611,663

Page248 SW July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT (TITP)

TITP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1STYear 2nc1Year 3n1Year 4u,Year 561 Year 661 Year i"Year 861 Year 9th Year PROJECT TITLE 10thYear II 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 TITP AWTF BRINE LINE MODS 257,980 7,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP AWTF INTERIM LIME SATUR SYS 151,018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP AWTF LIME SATURATOR SYS 3,119,940 1,319,260 36,310 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP AWTF MEMB FILT PROC PH2 0 0 0 107,590 552,300 2,926,780 2,681,360 0 0 0 TITPAWTFPH2 0 0 0 1,808,915 1,942,670 21,967,440 21,700,140 5,329,080 0 0 TITP CAPITAL EQP REPLC 216,000 43,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP CAPITAL STR REPLC 850,000 710,000 372,000 372,000 372,000 372,000 372,000 372,000 0 0 TITP CENTRATE WET WELL REHAB 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE 122, 780 165,562 820, 751 363,338 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP DIG GAS CONDIT FAC 137,340 382,650 2,312,610 902,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP DIG MODERNIZATION 74,400 402,400 914,811 1,519,857 31,739 0 0 0 0 0 TITP EFF PUMP SUCTN VALV REPL 403,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITPRNALTANKSTRUCTRLREHAB 2,334,000 2,170,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP FUTURE UTIL CONCEPT RPT 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS 134,420 246,275 1, 121,730 663,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP INTERIM CENTRIFUGE IMP 3,410,000 6,480,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP KNIFE GATE HP GASKET REPL 81,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP OUTFALL ASSESSMENT 37,000 163,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITPPOWER/ENERGYMGMT 38,000 368,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP RENEWABLE ENERGY 2,382,454 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP RENEWABLE ENERGY SLUDGE PIPING 206,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page281 TITP July 1, 2005 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUREAU OF SANITATION WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 • 2014/15 TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT {TITP)

1..-rYear 2"aYear 3'°Year 4"'Year 5th Year 6th Year 7'" Year 8th Year 9th Year 10th Year PROJECT TITLE 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 TITP SEC AIR MOD I SCUM REMOV 1, 153,420 1,261,720 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TITP SOLIDS HANDLING MODS 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000 3,100,000 12,600,000 12,600,000 0

TOTAL TITP 16,660,052 13,719,947 5,618,212 5,737,970 2,898,709 28,366,220 27,853,500 18,301,080 12,600,000 0

Page282 TITP July 1, 2005 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

ATTACHMENT B

SUMMARY STATUS OF CSSA DELIVERABLES Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

(This page was intentionally left blank.) Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary

I I Shaded Items fndlcate completed projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date Status Completed on SA 1 Interim Scrubber at ECIS (Mission & Jesse) Onetime 8/27/2004 08/26/04. Completed on SA2 lnterlf!l Scrubber at ECIS (23rd & San Pedro) Onetime 8/27/2004 08/26/04. Completec:f on SA3 Interim Scrubber at ECIS (Jefferson Siphon) Onetime 8/27/2004 08/26/04. Completed on SA4 Interim Scrubber at ECIS (NORS) Onetime 8/27/2004 08/26/04. Completed on SA5 EAST CENTRAL INTERCEPTOR SEWER Onetime 8/27/2004 08/09/04. The City will monitor all the odor control facilities as necessary to comply with SA6 Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing all regulatorv and oermit reaulrements. The City will modify Its Odor Complaint Response Form to Include a Completed on SA 7 Onetime 10/29/2004 qualitative description of the wind condition {By entry 10/29/04) 07/01/04. The City will make an initial return call to the community member filing the sewer odor complaint through the Sewer Odor Hotline (complainant) within 1 Completed on SAS week from the receipt of the hotline complaint if,requested by the Ongoing 10/29/2004 07/01/04. complainant and the complainant has provided call back Information (By entry 10/29/04} The City will Investigate the sewer odor complaint received by the Sewer Odor Hotline and shall call the complainant to attempt to report findings and Completed on SA9 actions within 30 days from the receipt of the Sewer Odor Hotline complaint If Ongoing 10/29/2004 07/01/04. requested by the complainant and the complainant has provided call back Information {By entry 10/29/04} Within 30 days after the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement (By SA 10 entry 10/29/04), the City shall pay the United States the sum of $800,000 as Onetime 11/28/2004 Completed. a civil oenalty. Within two months after ECIS becomes operational, the City will conduct monitoring of hydrogen sulfide gas levels, air pressure, and other necessary Completed on SA 11 Onetime 10/9/2004 parameters. Within 3 months after ECIS, share the result with the Odor 11/08/04. Advisory Board. Within 45 days after the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement, the City SA 12 shall pay Baykeeper $1,600,000; the lntervenors $ 425,000; and the Onetime 12/13/2004 Completed. Reaional Board $71,745 (By entry 10/29/04). 1stQ 1st Q Completed 10/30/2004 10/26/2004. For the first year after the entry Into this Settlement Agreement, the City will 2ndQ 2nd Q Completed prepare quarterly reports reviewing the Sewer Odor Hotline program. The 01/30/2005 01/26/2005. SA 13 Quarterly final report, including any findings and recommendations for Improvement, 3rdQ 3rd Q Completed shall be posted on the sewer hotline web page. 04/30/2005 04/29/2005. 4thQ 4th Q Completed 07/30/2005 07/29/2005. 1stQ 1st Q Completed 10/30/2004 10/26/2004. The City will report quarterly to the Odor Advisory Board, or more frequently H 2ndQ 2nd Q Completed requested by the Odor Advisory Board, on the removal levels for hydrogen 01/30/2005 01/26/2005. SA 14 sulfide at each of the odor control facilities (Interim scrubbers and permanent Quarterly 3rdQ 3rd Q Completed ATFs) showing Inlet concentration and outlet concentration. The Information 04/30/2005 04129/2005. will also be posted on the odor hotline web site. 4thQ 4th Q Completed 07/30/2005 07/29/2005. 1stQ 1st Q Completed 10/30/2004 10/2612004. On the thirtieth day of January, April, July, and October (30 days after the enc 2ndQ 2nd Q Completed of the fiscal quarter) of each year until this Settlement Agreement Is 01/30/2005 01/26/2005. SA 15 Quarterly terminated, the City shall submit to Plaintiffs a summary of all SSOs occurring 3rdQ 3rd Q Completed during the previous fiscal quarter. 04/30/2005 04/29/2005. 4thQ 4th Q Completed 07/30/2005 07/29/2005.

B-1 Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary

I I Shaded Items indicate ccmpleted projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date Status Completed on SA 16 EQ RPR SWRS U298 Onetime 12/14/2004 06/09/04. Completed on SA 17 EQ RPR SWRS U277 Onetime 1/13/2005 07/20/04. Completed on SA 18 EQ RPR SWRS U269 Onetime 1/13/2005 07/20/04. Completed on SA 19 EQ RPR SWRS U290 Onetime 2/11/2005 06/10/04. Completed on SA20 EQ RPR SWRS U289 Onetime 2/11/2005 06/10/04.

No later than six months after entry of this Agreement (estimated at 4/29105), the City shall submit a report that evaluates the need for modifications to Its current FOG eontrol Program Standard Operating Procedures ("SOPs") and Completed on SA21 Onetime 4/29/2005 Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response Gulde ("ERG"}, 04/22/05. and applicable sections of its existing rules and regulations implementing its Grease Control Ordinance. Completed on SA22 SAN PEDRO AREA SWR REHAB Onetime 2/28/2005 09/07/04. Within six months after the entry of this Agreement, the City shall submit a Completed on SA23 report on the City's progress on the wet weather Calibration andValldatlon of Onetime 4/29/2005 11/17/04. the Cltv's MOUSE model Within six months from the entry of this Settlement Agreement, the City shall, Completed on SA24 If practicable, arrange for calls to the Sewer Odor Hotline to be answered and Onetime 4/2912005 06/01/04. documented bv a live nerson rather than a recordlna. Within six months from the entry Into this Settlement Agreement. the City will develop an updated Odor Outreach Plan for advertising the Sewer Odor Completed on SA25 Onetime 4/29/2005 Hotline. As part of the City's Odor Outreach Plan, the City w!II develop a 04/29/05. communltv feedback svstem. Within six months of the entry Into this Settlement Agreement, the City will Completed on SA26 prepare written procedures forthe odor control measures the City currently Onetime 4/29/2005 04/27/05. employs Including the addition of chemicals for sewer odor control. Within six months from entry Into this Settlement Agreement, the City will prepare an Implementation plan for implementing the recommendations Completed on SA27 Onetime 4/29/2005 made as part of the Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program 04/27/05. for the Cltv of Los Anaeles. Completed on SA28 EQ RPR SWRS U346 Onetime 3/16/2005 05104/04. Completed on SA29 EQ RPR SWRS U344 Onetime 3/16/2005 05104/04. Completed on SA30 EQ RPR SWRS U373 Onetime 4/15/2005 05112/04. Completed on SA31 EQ RPR SWRS U369 Onetime 4/1512005 05112/04. Completed on SA32 EQ RPR SWRS U327 Onetime 5/16/2005 06/23/04. Completed on SA33 EQ RPR SWRS U317 Onetime 5/1612005 06123/04. Starting with FY 04/05, the City shall clean a minimum of 60,000 sewer Pipe 82,030 reaches were SA34 Annual 6/30/2005 Reaches annually. cleaned. Starting with FY 06/07, maintain a Three-Year Rolling Average of 65,000 SA35 Annual 6/30/2007 N/A sewer Pipe Reaches cleaned. Starting with FY 04/05, at a minimum, the City shall use CCTV to inspect 600 821 mites were SA36 Annual 6/30/2005 miles of pipes annually. lnsnAetArl. No later than 6/30/05, the City shall add the agreed to language to Its design Completed on SA37 Onetime 6/30/2005 manual 12/13/04.

B-2 r Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary I I Shaded Items Indicate completed projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date Status

No later than 6/30/05, the City shall utilize all current and past valid flow data Completed on SA38 to complete the development of an "R" Factors for all model basins within the Onetime 6/30/2005 11/17/04. CitY's MOUSE model. 100 % of the FSEs SA39 Starting FY 04/05, the City shall inspect all permitted FSEs annually. Annual 6/30/2005 were Inspected.

On an annual basis, or as requested by the Odor Advisory Board, the City will Completed on SA40 share summary data with the Odor Advisory Board regarding the odor control Annual 10/1/2005 07/30/05. measures utilized by the City and any relevant information

Completed on SA41 SOUTH LA CSRP U - 6 Onetime 7/30/2005 08104104. Completed on SA42 SOUTH LA CSRP U - 5 Onetime 7/30/2005 08/04104. Completed on SA43 SOUTH LA CSRP U - 3 Onetime 7/30/2005 12/22/04. On schedule. Working Original closely with contractor 8/30/2005 SA44 WILSHIRE AREA NE SWR REHAB Onetime to complete Revised contstruction by 11/30/2005 11/30/2005. Completed on SA45 MT WASHINGTON AREA SWR REHAB Onetime 9/30/2005 11/02/04. The City will report on the construction progress of the odor control facilities Completed on SA46 Annual 10/1/2005 as part of the annual report 09/30/05. By October 1, 2005 and on September 1 of each following year this Completed on SA47 Settlement Agreement remains in effect, the City shall submit an Annual Annual 10/1/2005 09/30/05. Progress Report Completed on SA48 NORTH EAST INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PHASE 1 Onetime 10/30/2005 05/27/05. Completed on SA49 S BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB Onetime 12/8/2005 08/10/05. Completed on SA50 HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM SWR REHAB Onetime 12/30/2005 03/02/05. On schedule. SA51 4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR REHAB Onetime 12/30/2005 Construction is 15% complete. Completed on SA52 EQ RPR SWRS U274 Onetime 3/16/2006 10/06/04. Completed on SA53 EQ RPR SWRS U340 Onetime 4/15/2006 03125/05. Completed on SA54 EQ RPR SWRS U283 Onetime 4/15/2006 03115/05. Completed on SA55 Harbor Area CSRP U- 6 Onetime 5/30/2006 08/02/05.

On schedule. Bid & SA56 NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR REPLC Onetime 5/31/2006 Award is 95% complete.

SA57 No later than 6/30/06, the City shall submit a Capacity Report and Plan Onetime 6/30/2006 On schedule. No later than 6/30/06, the City shall submit a Rehabilitation and Replacement SA58 Onetime 6/30/2006 On schedule. Reoort and Plan. In FY 04/05 and FY 05/06, the City shall apply chemicals to a minimum of 474 miles were treated SA59 Annual 7/1/2005 150 miles of sewers annually to control the growth of roots. In FY04-05. Completed on SA60 EQ SWR RPR U300 Onetime 7/15/2006 11/15/04. Completed on SA61 EQ RPR SWRS U299 Onetime 7/15/2006 11/15/04. Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary , I I Shaded Items Indicate completed projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date status

On schedule. SA62 LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR REPLC Onetime 7/30/2006 Construction is 85% complete. On schedule. SA63 HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U- 2 Onetime 7/30/2006 Construction is 98% complete. The City will complete the preparation of its Odor Master Plan within 2 years SA64 Onetime 10/29/2006 On schedule. from the entrv into this SeWement Aareement. On schedule. SA65 EQ RPR SWRS U295 Onetime 9/15/2006 Construction Is 99% complete. On schedule. SA66 EQ RPR SWRS U292 Onetime 9/15/2006 Construction is 99% complete. On schedule. SA67 EQ RPR SWRS U291 Onetime 9/15/2006 Construction is 99% complete. No later than 9/30/06, the City shall submit an evaluation of the effectiveness SA68 Onetime 9/30/2006 On schedule. and annlicabillty of its use of root control chemicals.

Revising Construction Plans with a new project schedule. On August 25, 2005, a request was SA69 AVE 45 ARROYO DR RLF SWR Onetime 10/6/2006 made to Government Plaintiffs for extension of the Construction End . Date to 10/30/2009. On schedule. SA 70 EQ RPR SWRS U354 Onetime 10/14/2006 Construction Is 99% complete. On schedule. SA 71 Interim Scrubber at NEIS (Humboldt) Onetime 10/30/2006 Construction Is 70% complete. On schedule. SA 72 Interim Scrubber at NEIS (Richmond) Onetime 10/30/2006 Construction Is 70% complete. On schedule. SA 73 EAGLE ROCK INTER SWR Onetime 10/30/2006 Construction is 62% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA 74 BAYWOOD BNDCT ESMT SWR Onetime 10/31/2006 Award is 70% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA 75 FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO SWR Onetime 10/31/2006 Award is 30% complete.

On schedule. SA 76 BUCKINGHAM DIVR SWR Onetime 11/11/2006 Construction is 30% complete. On schedule. SA 77 EQ RPR SWRS U339 Onetime 11/15/2006 Construction is 85% complete. On schedule. SA 78 EQ RPR SWRS U338 Onetime 11/15/2006 Construction is 85% complete. On schedule. SA 79 EQ RPR SWRS U320 Onetime 12/15/2006 Construction is 99% comolete. On schedule. SA80 EQ RPR SWRS U316 Onetime 12/15/2006 Construction is 99% comolete.

B-4 Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary

I I Shaded Items Indicate oomp/eted projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date Status

On schedule. Bid & SA 81 SEPULVEDA VAL MEADOW RLF SWR Onetime 12/30/2006 Award Is 35% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA82 WASHINGTON FLOWER GRAND SWR REPLC Onetime 12/30/2006 Award Is 90% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA83 CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-5 Onetime 12/30/2006 Award is 90% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA84 CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-3 & U-4 Onetime 12/30/2006 Award Is 90% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA85 12TH HILL SWR REHAB Onetime 12/30/2006 Award is 92% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA86 NOS DIV HUMBOLDT AV 18 & SFR Onetime 12/31/2006 Award is 90% complete. On schedule. In Bid & SA87 SLAUSONNAN NESS/COS EXTERNAL BYPASS Onetime 12/31/2006 Award.

On schedule. Design SA88 SAN FERNANDO PSDNA SWR REHAB Onetime 12/31/2006 completed 08/10/2005.

Completed on SA89 EQ RPR SWRS U294 Onetime 1/13/2007 06/05/05 Completed on SA90 EQ RPR SWRS U293 Onetime 1/16/2007 06/05/05 On schedule. SA 91 EQ RPR SWRS U319 Onetime 2/15/2007 Construction Is 50% comolete. On schedule. SA92 EQ RPR SWRS U318 Onetime 2/15/2007 Construction Is 50% comolete. On schedule. SA93 Harbor Area. CSRP U- 3 Onetime 3/3/2007 Construction is 35% complete. On schedule. SA94 EQ RPR SWRS U342 Onetime 3/15/2007 Construction is 25% complete. On schedule. SA95 EQ RPR SWRS U341 Onetime 3/15/2007 Construction is 25% comolete. On schedule. SA96 FLINT AVE G ST SWR REPLC Onetime 3/24/2007 Construction is 90% comolete. On schedule. SA97 EQ RPR SWRS U304 Onetime 4/14/2007 Construction Is 16% comolete. On schedule. SA98 EQ RPR SWRS U296 Onetime 4/14/2007 Construction is 16% comolete. On schedule. Design Is SA99 HOOVER ST SWR REHAB Onetime 5/2/2007 93% complete. On schedule. Bid & SA 100 LINCOLN 83RD SWR REPLC Onetime 6/30/2007 Award is 50% complete.

On schedule. Bid & SA 101 Harbor Area CSRP U- 5 & WILM U-20 Onetime 6/30/2007 Award is 50% complete.

On schedule. Design Is SA 102 ATF at ECIS (Mission & Jesse) Onetime 5/23/2008 75% comolete.

B-5 Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary

I I Shaded Items Indicate completed projects.

No. Requirement Frequency SA Due Date Status On schedule. Project Is SA 103 ATF at ECIS (23rd & San Pedro) Onetime 5/23/2008 In Bid & Award. On schedule. Design Is SA 104 ATF at ECIS (Jefferson Siphon) Onetime 5/23/2008 90% comolete. On schedule. Design is SA 105 ATF at ECIS (NORS) Onetime 5/23/2008 90% comolete. On schedule. Project Is SA 106 ATF at NCOS (Jefferson and Rodeo) Onetime 5/23/2008 In Bid & Award. The City will develop written maintenance and operations manual for each of SA 107 Onetime 5/23/2008 On schedule. theATFs. SA 108 The Cltv will install an indicator liaht on the outside wall of each ATF Onetime 5/23/2008 On schedule. With the completion of each of the ATFs, the City will extend an invitation to SA 109 Onetime 5/23/2008 On schedule. the Odor Advlsorv Board to tour the facffitv. In FY 07/08 through FY 13/14, the City shall rehabilitate or replace 50 miles SA 110 Annual 6/30/2008 On schedule. minimum. On schedule. Design is SA 111 ATF at NEIS (Humboldt) Onetime 3/26/2009 60% comolete. On schedule. Design is SA 112 ATF at NEIS (Richmond) Onetime 3/26/2009 60% comolete. No later than 6/30/09, the City shall have expanded its MOUSE model to SA 113 Onetime 6/30/2009 On schedule. include all Primarv Sewers. No later than 6/30/09, the City shall complete and submit its Integrated SA 114 Onetime 6/30/2009 On schedule. Resources Plan ((RP) SA 115 No later than 6/30/09, the City shall complete all Primary Basin Plans. Onetime 6/30/2009 On schedule. If, in any three-Year period starting with the three-Year period comprising FY 7/08 through FY 09/10, the City rehabilltates or replaces, on a Three-Year Average, more miles of pipe than is required pursuant to the approved SA 116 Annual 9/1/2010 NIA Rehabilltation and Replacement Report and Plan submitted pursuant to Subsection VI.D. of this Settlement Agreement, the City may "bank" the excess miles of pipe. No later than 6/30/14, the City shall complete Secondary Basin Plans for the SA 117 Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. 100 hiahest orioritv secondary basins. The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP: SA 118 Onetime NIA On schedule. North Atwater Creek Restoration Proiect The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP: SA 119 South Los Angeles Storm Water Treatment Project at 54th Onetime NIA On schedule. and Avalon St. The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP: SA 120 Onetime N/A On schedule. Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Protect The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP: SA 121 Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution Control and Water Onetime NIA On schedule. Circulation Enhancements The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP: SA 122 Downtown Los Angeles Storm Drain Low-Flow Onetime NIA On schedule. Diversion Project The City shall complete the following SEP: SA 123 Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. North Atwater Creek Restoration Proiect The City shall complete the following SEP: SA 124 South Los Angeles Storm Water Treatment Project at 54th Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. and Avalon St. The City shall complete the following SEP: SA 125 Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Project The City shall complete the following SEP: SA 126 Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution Control and Water Circulation Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. Enhancements The City shall complete the following SEP: SA 127 Onetime 6/30/2014 On schedule. Downtown Los Anaeles Storm Drain Low-Flow Diversion Proiect - - Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

ATTACHMENT C

SUMMARY STATUS OF THE NORTH ATWATER CREEK RESTORATION & WATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

! .J Collection System Settlement- Agreement (CSSA) Annual• Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

NORTH ATWATER CREEK RESTORATION & WATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

PROJECT LOCATION

Area in Atwater Village located adjacent to the L.A. River in the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed.

DESCRIPTION (Refer to Figure C1)

The North Atwater Creek Restoration and Water Quality Enhancement Project will construct water quality physical and structural improvements to an area along the Los Angeles (LA) River. The project will restore wetlands for stormwater runoff capture and treatment and provide habitat linkage to the LA River. This will begin a restoration and revitalization of the LA River and its vicinity where wetlands existed along the riverbanks. The project will reconstruct an area along the LA River in the North Atwater community and restore wetlands to treat runoff from the North Atwater Creek storm drain. Water for irrigation of the site could potentially be pumped from the LA River, treated and applied to the landscape. In addition, runoff Best Management Practices will be implemented to minimize waste from horses using the LA riverbank from entering the LA River. This will directly benefit the East and Northeast LA communities, which are predominantly low income and minority.

The Los Angeles River through an area known as the Glendale-Narrows still contains a naturalized streambed and supports a rich diversity of bird life, as well as aquatic species. This project will create wetlands, a seasonal creek, trails and footbridges for the public to enjoy, as well as educational information so that the public can understand the fuller riparian ecosystem that once existed here. Water for the wetlands will be provided through stormwater runoff; irrigation water by pumping from LA River, treating it, and applying it to the landscape. The surrounding residential neighborhood is predominantly low income and minority. On the other side of the site are active recreation fields and equestrian amenities. The benefits this project provides are numerous: demonstrating that Los Angeles can revive its ecosystems with water that is currently discarded and thus at the same time show that the City can augment water supply by utilizing this water for landscaping; improving water quality through on-site treatment; restoring habitat; increasing open space, places for passive recreation and education; implementing non-point source Best Management Practices; as well as flood hazard mitigated through the use of the storm water capture and treatment. A significant planning effort is underway to revitalize the Los Angeles River from an economic, ecologic, and social perspective. This park and wetlands will provide early proof of many of the concepts that have been discussed for river revitalization and have a significant impact on the pace of the revitalization effort. Currently the site is used primarily for storage of tree cuttings. Implementing this project will provide a great opportunity to demonstrate how the City can tum the liability of runoff into an asset and start the process of becoming more sustainable in the use of regional water resources. It will also provide an opportunity for visitors to see a working wetland and enjoy nature as it once existed. Given its close proximity to active recreation, the project takes advantage of visitor use already, and provides ready opportunities for education.

C-1 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the project are: Wetlands creation and utilization of runoff; Restoration of riparian and upland habitat; Demonstration of sustainable use of local water resources; Implementation of non-point source Best Management Practices; Increased open space and passive recreation; Safe and pleasurable access to the Los Angeles River and bikeway; Ecosystem education; Improved water quality; and Post-project monitoring to understand the effectiveness and maintenance of the systems installed.

WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Ecosystem restoration* Environmental and habitat protection and improvement* Water supply reliability* Flood management* Groundwater management* Recreation and public access* Storm water capture and management* Water conservation* Water quality protection and improvement* Water recycling* Wetlands enhancement and creation* Conjunctive use Desalination Imported water Land use planning NPS pollution control Surface storage Watershed planning Water and wastewater treatment Water transfer

* Pursuant to ewe §§ 79562.5 and 79564, these water management strategies must be considered to meet the minimum IRWM Plan Standards.

Ecosystem Restoration: Much of the ecosystem of the Los Angeles River has been lost or degraded. This project will put back ecosystem function by creating a wetland and seasonal creek that typically would have existed along the river. Old maps of the Los Angeles River show a braided river with vast areas of wetlands and creeks, some ephemeral. This will mimic that function and structure.

C-2 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Environmental Protection and Habitat Improvement: The wetlands and surrounding area planted in California natives will provide high quality habitat adjacent to a naturalized portion of the LA River. The project will provide a habitat linkage to the river from an upland area. Educational materials can foster an appreciation of nature and expand the constituency to care and protect these special places.

Water Supply Reliability: Although minor in its immediate impact on water supply, this project can demonstrate how the region can better utilize its existing water resources without necessarily treating storm water to drinking water standards. It is estimated that 40-60% of all water use in Southern California is for landscaping. By using this resource for landscaping and habitat creation, the City can reduce its dependence on imported water.

Flood Management: The utilization of runoff from the surrounding area will keep some of the water out of the Los Angeles River and mitigate flood potential.

Recreation and Public Access: The site is already adjacent to a park with active recreation; this will enhance recreational opportunities and provide access to one of the naturalized streambed portions of the river. When the bike path along the river is eventually completed, this could provide an opportunity to create an entry point to the bike path, with the ability to bike all the way to Long Beach.

Storm Water Capture and Management: The primary objectives of the project are to use a wetland to capture and treat stormwater; install non-point source Best Management Practices in the parking lot; and treat the water pumped from the river for irrigation purposes.

Water Conservation: By eliminating the use of potable, imported water, the project conserves water for drinking purposes. The use of native plants will further conserve irrigation water.

Water Quality Protection and Improvement: All the water utilized on the project will be treated and improved. The project will remove typical constituents found in urban runoff such as oils, grease, and trash. It will also remove constituents such as nutrients from high quality effluent from upstream sewage treatment plants that discharge to the river.

Water Recycling: Much of the dry weather flows in the Los Angeles River are from the Donald C. Tillman and Los Angeles/Glendale sewage treatment plants. This project will recycle the water from those plants for irrigation purposes.

Wetlands Enhancement and Creation: This creates wetlands where none currently exists.

NPS Pollution Control: Urban runoff is ubiquitous; yet this project will capture the runoff from the surrounding neighborhood and treat it through a wetland. Best Management Practices installed on the parking lot on site will also treat NPS pollution. Both of these will prevent pollutants from entering the Los Angeles River.

Surface Storage: The wetland will provide surface storage of water.

Watershed Planning: This project has been identified as a key project in the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan, and with its multiple benefits and elements, is a good example of watershed planning and implementation.

C-3 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Water and Wastewater Treatment: The urban runoff will be directly treated through Best Management Practices and the wetland system. Additional wastewater treatment will be somewhat indirect, yet real, in that the primary source of dry weather flows in the river that will be pumped to the site are high quality effluent from the sewage treatment plants, which will be further treated through nutrient removal.

PARTNERSHIPS

The City of Los Angeles is the only agency needed to implement the project. However, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works is also supportive of the project. There is consensus within the City of Los Angeles - Bureau of Engineering, Bureau of Sanitation, Recreation and Parks Department, Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles River Ad Hoc Committee, and local City Council District are all in support of the project.

POLLUTION CONTROL

The project collects urban runoff and will reduce pollutant loads associated with the captured urban stormwater runoff, thereby incrementally reducing current and any future TMDL requirements (trash, bacteria, metals, etc) for the Los Angeles River. The project may also utilize various treatment techniques to improve water quality. Construction of the proposed wetlands will undoubtedly reduce the amount of nutrients downstream and will likely result in reduction of other pollutants.

WATER QUALITY MONITORING

WPD will monitor water quality before and after construction of the wetlands. The success of plant establishment and percentage of the native vegetation will be documented. Wildlife utilization of the wildlife corridor will be documented before and after project implementation. Water quality monitoring will be coordinated with Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to assist in data collection. Project success will be quantifiably measured through the improvement of water quality. The project will be monitored prior to construction to establish baseline water quality conditions. This will be accomplished by utilizing strategically located flow measuring devices, surface water and water quality monitoring devices. A final list of specific constituents to be monitored by the water quality monitoring program will be developed in collaboration with the stakeholders. For the first five years of project implementation, stormwater sampling will occur at least quarterly. Thereafter, a yearly sampling will be done unless otherwise determined through the analysis of the previously collected data. Currently, the City leads an established stormwater sampling program that can accomplish pre-project water quality monitoring.

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT

One of the key objectives of this project is to be a demonstration site for numerous technologies from created wetlands to installation of Best Management Practices. Monitoring will provide key information on the operation of the project and adjustments will be made throughout the life of the project, especially as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are implemented on the river and watershed management is implemented in the region. Through the monitoring results, the

C-4 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

project flow rates and treatment systems can be adjusted if necessary, along with maintenance operations.

DATA MANAGEMENT

The data will be gathered and tracked by the existing staff of the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Watershed Protection Division. Results will be made available to the public primarily through the use of the City's website: http://www.lastormwater.org. The data will also be incorporated with the Friends of the Los Angeles River (FoLAR) Riverwatch program that has been conducting water quality sampling along the river. The Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council has an extensive website and there will be a link from their website to the City's website. Finally, results of monitoring from this project, as well as others in the region will be presented at Watershed Council Stakeholder meetings.

CONNECTION TO LOCAL PLANNING

This project has been identified in the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the Upper Los Angeles River, as part of the early planning for the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan, and as a Supplemental Environmental Project as part of a settlement for sewage overflows.

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT

Leading the effort are the City of Los Angeles agencies, including the Recreation and Parks Department, the Council District, and the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation. Additional stakeholders include park users, the local Audubon Society, homeowner associations, Neighborhood Councils, and local businesses. Regulatory stakeholders include the California Department of Fish and Game, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Los Angeles County Vector Control District. Planning efforts have been ongoing for several years. These efforts have resulted in discussion among many of the stakeholders listed above, as well as public meetings intended to gather community input. Feedback has been very positive and supportive, and contacts have been excited about the implementation of a sustainable project that brings multiple benefits to the community and the watershed as a whole.

BENEFIT TO A DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY

The project is located in and provides a direct benefit to many disadvantaged communities. Matching funds will not be provided directly by the community and, therefore, the funding requirements will not pose a hardship to the community. I

C-5 Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA} Annual Progress Report No. 1 For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005

Figure C-1: LAYOUT AND SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED PROJECT

~ -(~A':,11 .e:ArfU.:f. ~M f llrtEql?A1'a> Im<' !;fl".€f.1'~\

C-6 '.'z

""" to rotect ubllc health and the environment