Investigating Plasma Storms and Substorms in Our Near-Earth Backyard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating Plasma Storms and Substorms in Our Near-Earth Backyard Investigating Plasma Storms and Dr Tony Lui Substorms in our Near-Earth Backyard ‘This research has potential applications in understanding the physical processes responsible for many explosive phenomena in the universe at large’ INVESTIGATING PLASMA STORMS AND SUBSTORMS IN OUR NEAR-EARTH BACKYARD Space physicist Dr Tony Lui has spent four decades increasing our understanding of the mechanisms behind the magnetic disturbances and interactions of space plasma surrounding our home planet. Plasma, a ubiquitous state of matter candle flames and the cores of nuclear solar wind. This hot, ionised gas travels out reactors. Overall, roughly 99.9% of the matter from the star and interacts with any objects it In the calm and comfort of a classroom, we in the Universe exists as plasma, rather than encounters, particularly those with magnetic interacting with the Earth’s magnetosphere Apollo 11 lunar landing with Neil Armstrong A few years later, while studying auroral have all learned about atoms and molecules. the solid, liquid or gas we know here on fields. Thus, the Earth’s magnetosphere leads to a very practical question: what effect as the first human stepping on the surface images from Defence Meteorological We think of these tiny constituents of all Earth. And because the particles that make interacts with the solar wind as does the does all this have on our space objects, of the moon,’ he explains. ‘He left “the next Satellite Program satellites, Dr Lui described matter as having a compact nucleus with up plasma are electrically charged, they can magnetosphere of Jupiter or Mercury or such as telecommunication satellites or giant leap imprint”. I was attracted to space large-scale, saw-toothed undulations on a peaceful cloud of orbiting electrons. The conduct electricity and are influenced by any other planetary body with a magnetic the International Space Station? We know research by this exciting adventure.’ the equatorward edge of the visible diffuse positive charge of the nucleus and the magnetic fields. This makes for fascinating field. On the impact side of the planet – the that solar flares, or sun spots, dramatically aurora during magnetic storms. He found negative charge of the electrons sum to electromagnetic interactions, some of which planet’s ‘day’ side – there is a significant increase the solar wind at intervals, and Soon after this, some of his early research that the amplitude of these waveforms was zero and life is neutral and good. But what if Dr Lui has studied for most of his professional compression of the planet’s magnetic field may at times disrupt our communications. which was published in 1973 in Planetary large, from about 40 to 400 km, which would those atoms and molecules exist in regions life. by the solar or stellar wind, especially at How can we predict that or prevent it? What Space Science interpreted data from the explain why it had not been observed from of space where temperatures are, well, high altitudes. On the ‘night’ side of the about the effects on our orbiting electronics Canadian satellite ISIS-2, one of a series the ground. This phenomenon could last astronomically high – hot enough to strip The Earth’s Magnetosphere – a plasma planet – with the solar wind blowing on and people? We need to know how all this of Canadian satellites launched to study for about 0.5 to 3.5 hours. In each of the four these electrons from their nucleus? Then we playground past – the plasma flow actually causes the works so we can find answers to these the Earth’s ionosphere. ISIS-2 was able to cases he observed, the undulation occurred do not have the tame, neutral atoms and magnetosphere to stretch out into a ‘tail’, important questions. And that is what Dr take images of the entire Aurora Borealis during a geomagnetic storm interval near molecules we are familiar with on Earth – we The Earth, because of its liquid outer core conceptually similar to the tail of a comet. Lui has worked on for years, investigating from above. Dr Lui analysed the resulting the peak development of the storm time ring have plasma. of molten iron, is surrounded by an intrinsic the physical processes of near-Earth plasma images and discovered that, unlike images current. This finding was exciting enough magnetic field. Thus, we describe the Earth Here on Earth we see some of the interaction disturbances to hopefully allow forecasting taken from the ground, the big picture from to be reported in the local newspaper and Plasma – the so-called fourth state of as having a north ‘pole’ and south ‘pole’, between the solar wind and the Earth’s of space disturbances as we achieve a better above indicated that the aurora was not it was later published in the Journal of matter, is a gas so hot that its atoms are just as we would a magnet. The space magnetosphere, especially in the northern understanding of their underlying causes. individual auroral arcs as depicted in popular Geophysical Research. split into a cloud of ions and electrons surrounding the Earth where its magnetic and southern latitudes. Most commonly, the photographs. There was actually a diffuse that move and flow independent of each field significantly influences the plasma interactions result in spectacular light shows Let’s start by watching the light show! and uniform belt of aurora that contained As technology progressed, Dr Lui kept other. Astronomically speaking, plasma is contained there is called the magnetosphere. called aurorae. In the northern hemisphere, some discrete arcs and bands encircling progressing as well, particularly since satellite everywhere. Our sun and the stars are made Most of this plasma comes from the Sun in this is called the Aurora Borealis – the Dr Lui tells Scientia about what inspired him the poles. This was a significant leap in our auroral imagers were continuously being of plasma, for example. The solar wind and the form of the solar wind. Northern Lights, while in the south the same to dedicate his career to the study of space understanding of auroras and considered a improved with each new satellite mission the tails of comets contain plasma. Even phenomenon is known as Aurora Australis. phenomena. ‘The year I graduated with my major achievement in our understanding of and global views of auroras became more in our everyday experience here on Earth, The Sun, or any star for that matter, gives off But all consideration of visual spectacle physics degree from the University of Hong the solar-terrestrial relationship. abundantly available for investigation. This plasma can be found in such places as massive amounts of plasma in what is called aside, the fact that high energy ionic particles Kong was the year that the U.S. had the allowed researchers like Dr Lui to conduct fluorescent and neon lights, lightning flashes, a stellar wind. For our Sun, it’s termed the are dancing around our near-Earth space WWW.SCIENTIAPUBLICATIONS.COM WWW.SCIENTIAPUBLICATIONS.COM large analyses on auroral images to examine the dynamic behaviour DR TONY LUI of auroral activities – hence also magnetospheric activities – in an unprecedented way. Getting a bird’s-eye view of solar storms Early on, it was known that the worldwide depression of the geomagnetic field during magnetic storms was caused by the development of a ring current encircling the Earth. However, because of the lack of measurements covering the energies for the ring current, determination on the evolution of the ring current during a magnetic storm was lacking until the Active Magnetospheric Particle Particles and Ion Composition (EPIC) instrument on the Japanese- Tracer Explorers (AMPTE) mission was launched – three spacecraft NASA satellite Geotail in the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics designed to study the sources, transport, and acceleration of energetic Science Initiative (ISTP) program. It was launched in 1992 and the data magnetospheric ions. This was the first time that the evolution of is still flowing in. Dr Lui is also a co-investigator of the Research with the ring current during two magnetic storms was quantitatively Adaptive Particle Imaging Detectors (RAPID) instruments on European investigated. Dr Lui calculated from the data that the ring current Space Agency’s Cluster satellite mission, launched in 2000. The aim intensified initially at its outer edge and later evolved to cover over the of that instrument was to record data to generate 3-dimensional Meet the researcher entire radial range of the ring current. This was published in 1987 in the distributions of high-energy electrons and ions in plasma. Journal of Geophysical Research. Dr Tony Tat Yin Lui Senior Professional Staff Scientist Perhaps even more exciting, a new diagnostic tool for magnetospheric ‘The evolution of electrical currents in space plasma can be revealed in investigation was developed for looking at energetic neutral atom future suitable satellite constellation, which will yield very illuminating The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (ENA) emissions, produced by charge-exchange collisions between clues on the nature of physical processes that produce explosive Laurel, Maryland energetic magnetospheric ions and the cold neutral hydrogen atoms. energetic phenomena and turbulence in space plasmas.’ ENA measurements were taken with the Geotail satellite, a joint USA Japan-USA endeavour to study the structure and dynamics of the tail region of the magnetosphere with a comprehensive set of scientific In 2007, NASA launched a set of five satellites named THEMIS – Time instruments. Prior to the Geotail mission, no composition information History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms. for ENA emissions was available. The first composition information of The purpose of those satellites was to study substorms in the Earth’s ENA was reported with measurements from the Energetic Particles and magnetosphere, especially where they intensify auroras near the Dr Tony Tat Yin Lui received his PhD in Space Physics in 1974 from KEY COLLABORATORS Ion Composition (EPIC) instrument on Geotail.
Recommended publications
  • A Nonstorm Time Enhancement of Relativistic Electrons in the Outer Radiation Belt Quintin Schiller,1,2 Xinlin Li,1,2 Lauren Blum,1,2 Weichao Tu,3 Drew L
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 41, 7–12, doi:10.1002/2013GL058485, 2014 A nonstorm time enhancement of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt Quintin Schiller,1,2 Xinlin Li,1,2 Lauren Blum,1,2 Weichao Tu,3 Drew L. Turner,4 and J. B. Blake5 Received 29 October 2013; revised 27 November 2013; accepted 28 November 2013; published 15 January 2014. [1] Despite the lack of a geomagnetic storm (based on the [3] Acceleration mechanisms, which replenish the relativ- Dst index), relativistic electron fluxes were enhanced over istic electron content, can be classified into two broad catego- 2.5 orders of magnitude in the outer radiation belt in 13 h ries: radial transport and internal acceleration. Radial on 13–14 January 2013. The unusual enhancement was transport mechanisms can again be broadly classified into observed by Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS), two subcategories: radial diffusion and sudden injection, onboard the Van Allen Probes; Relativistic Electron and both of which violate the third adiabatic invariant. Radial Proton Telescope Integrated Little Experiment, onboard transport requires an electron source population at high L, the Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment; and such as the plasma sheet in the tail of the magnetosphere Solid State Telescope, onboard Time History of Events [e.g., Ingraham et al., 2001]. Radial transport by diffusion and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS). in the third adiabatic invariant is a result of incoherent scatter- Analyses of MagEIS phase space density (PSD) profiles ing by ULF waves in the Pc4–5 band [e.g., Tu et al., 2012]. show a positive outward radial gradient from 4 < L < 5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Geomagnetic Storms in South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA)
    Analysis of geomagnetic storms in South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) Júlia Maria Soja Sampaio, Elder Yokoyama, Luciana Figueiredo Prado Copyright 2019, SBGf - Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica Moreover, Dst and AE indices may vary according to the This paper was prepared for presentation during the 16th International Congress of the geomagnetic field geometry, such as polar to intermediate Brazilian Geophysical Society held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19-22 August 2019. latitudinal field variations. In this framework, fluctuations Contents of this paper were reviewed by the Technical Committee of the 16th in the geomagnetic field can occur under the influence of International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society and do not necessarily represent any position of the SBGf, its officers or members. Electronic reproduction or the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA). The SAMA storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent is a region of minimum geomagnetic field intensity values of the Brazilian Geophysical Society is prohibited. ____________________________________________________________________ at the Earth’s surface (Figure 1), and its dipole intensity is decreasing along the past 1000 years (Terra-Nova et. al., Abstract 2017). Geomagnetic storm is a major disturbance of Earth’s In this study we will compare the behavior of the types of magnetosphere resulted from the interaction of solar wind geomagnetic storms basis on AE and Dst indices. and the Earth’s magnetic field. This disturbance depends of the Earth magnetic field geometry, and varies in terms of intensity from the Poles to the Equator. This disturbance is quantified through geomagnetic indices, such as the Dst and the AE indices.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Emission of Cosmic Rays from Jupiter. Magnetospheres As Possible Sources of Cosmic Rays
    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Emission of cosmic rays from Jupiter. Magnetospheres as possible Sources of Cosmic Rays G.Pizzella Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. Measurements made recently with the PAMELA satellite have shown with good evidence that a fraction of the cosmic rays detected on Earth comes from Jupiter. This result draws attention to the idea that magnetospheres of astrophysical objects could contribute to the sources of cosmic rays. We discuss this conjecture on the basis of Earth installed instrumentation and of the measurements made with PAMELA. The experiments strongly favor the validity of the conjecture. In particular the PAMELA data show that the proton fluxes are larger when the Earth orbit intersects the lines of the interplanetary magnetic field connecting Jupiter with Earth. This effect shows up with more than ten standard deviations, difficult to explain without the idea that part of the cosmic ray protons comes directly from the Jupiter magnetosphere. PACS. 94.30 Magnetosphere { 98.40.S Cosmic Rays 1 Introduction 2 The trapped radiation An unexpected discovery was the Van Allen belt in 1958. It has been recently published a paper [1] showing good Although in earlier times Kristian Birkeland, Carl St¨ormer, evidence that a small but not negligible fraction of cos- and Nicholas Christofilos considered the possibility that mic rays detected by the Earth satellite PAMELA1 comes fluxes of charged particles could dwell in the magnetic field from the planet Jupiter. The suggestion was that higher surrounding the Earth, nobody was expecting so large energy particles leak out from the Jupiter trapped particle density of charged particle population that formed a sort region and then are ejected into space following the inter- of permanent belt surrounding the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • On Magnetic Storms and Substorms
    ILWS WORKSHOP 2006, GOA, FEBRUARY 19-24, 2006 On magnetic storms and substorms G. S. Lakhina, S. Alex, S. Mukherjee and G. Vichare Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, New Panvel (W), Navi Mumbai-410218, India Abstract. Magnetospheric substorms and storms are indicators of geomagnetic activity. Whereas the geomagnetic index AE (auroral electrojet) is used to study substorms, it is common to characterize the magnetic storms by the Dst (disturbance storm time) index of geomagnetic activity. This talk discusses briefly the storm-substorms relationship, and highlights some of the characteristics of intense magnetic storms, including the events of 29-31 October and 20-21 November 2003. The adverse effects of these intense geomagnetic storms on telecommunication, navigation, and on spacecraft functioning will be discussed. Index Terms. Geomagnetic activity, geomagnetic storms, space weather, substorms. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction latitude magnetic fields are significantly depressed over a Magnetospheric storms and substorms are indicators of time span of one to a few hours followed by its recovery geomagnetic activity. Where as the magnetic storms are which may extend over several days (Rostoker, 1997). driven directly by solar drivers like Coronal mass ejections, solar flares, fast streams etc., the substorms, in simplest terms, are the disturbances occurring within the magnetosphere that are ultimately caused by the solar wind. The magnetic storms are characterized by the Dst (disturbance storm time) index of geomagnetic activity. The substorms, on the other hand, are characterized by geomagnetic AE (auroral electrojet) index. Magnetic reconnection plays an important role in energy transfer from solar wind to the magnetosphere. Magnetic reconnection is very effective when the interplanetary magnetic field is directed southwards leading to strong plasma injection from the tail towards the inner magnetosphere causing intense auroras at high-latitude nightside regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Detailed Ionic Composition of the Near-Earth Plasma
    HeliophysicsHELIO 2050 2050 White Papers (2021) R. Ilie4094.pdf THE NEED FOR DETAILED IONIC COMPOSITION OF THE NEAR-EARTH PLASMA An impressive body of work has been devoted to the escape of H+, He+ and O+ ions from Earth’s ionosphere, and their circulation and redistribution throughout the terrestrial magneto- sphere (Schunk and Raitt, 1980; Schunk and Sojka, 1997; Winglee et al., 2002; Glocer et al., 2009; Ilie et al., 2015; Ilie and Liemohn, 2016). However, the transport and energization of N+, in addi- tion to that of O+, has not been considered by most studies, even though a number of direct and indirect measurements made to describe the ionic composition of the ionosphere-magnetosphere system, have established that N+ is a significant ion species in the ionosphere and its presence in the magnetosphere is significant. A wide range in the magnitude oftheN+ to O+ density ratio has been reported, with significant variations not only with geomagnetic activity, but also with solar cycle, season, time of day, latitude, etc (Mall et al., 2002; Christon et al., 2002). These vari- ations suggest that N+ and O+, while relatively close in mass, they obey different chemical and energization processes, and possibly follow different paths of energization. In addition, observations from the WIND STICS ISIS 2 spacecraft (Hoffman et al., 1974) indicated that not only N+, but also molecular ions were ob- served in the Earth’s magnetosphere Geotail STICS AMPTE and ionosphere. Measurements from CCE Explorer 31 Akebono SMS the Arase satellite (Miyoshi et al., MMS ISIS-2 IMS DE-1 RIMSS e-POP 2018) showed the existence of molec- OGO-6 OGOGO-2-2 IMSS Sputnik3 IMS AE-C ular ions in the Earth’s ring cur- RMS IMS rent region, even under moderate ge- omagnetic storm conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Magnetospheres
    CLBE001-ESS2E November 9, 2006 17:4 100-C 25-C 50-C 75-C C+M 50-C+M C+Y 50-C+Y M+Y 50-M+Y 100-M 25-M 50-M 75-M 100-Y 25-Y 50-Y 75-Y 100-K 25-K 25-19-19 50-K 50-40-40 75-K 75-64-64 Planetary Magnetospheres Margaret Galland Kivelson University of California Los Angeles, California Fran Bagenal University of Colorado, Boulder Boulder, Colorado CHAPTER 28 1. What is a Magnetosphere? 5. Dynamics 2. Types of Magnetospheres 6. Interaction with Moons 3. Planetary Magnetic Fields 7. Conclusions 4. Magnetospheric Plasmas 1. What is a Magnetosphere? planet’s magnetic field. Moreover, unmagnetized planets in the flowing solar wind carve out cavities whose properties The term magnetosphere was coined by T. Gold in 1959 are sufficiently similar to those of true magnetospheres to al- to describe the region above the ionosphere in which the low us to include them in this discussion. Moons embedded magnetic field of the Earth controls the motions of charged in the flowing plasma of a planetary magnetosphere create particles. The magnetic field traps low-energy plasma and interaction regions resembling those that surround unmag- forms the Van Allen belts, torus-shaped regions in which netized planets. If a moon is sufficiently strongly magne- high-energy ions and electrons (tens of keV and higher) tized, it may carve out a true magnetosphere completely drift around the Earth. The control of charged particles by contained within the magnetosphere of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE Grade Level 11–12
    IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE Grade Level 11–12 Instructional Objectives Key Topic Students will Atomic physics • practice and review atomic physics concepts and equations; Degree of Difficulty • apply Planck’s constant; Moderate • determine the deBroglie wavelength of a proton; and analyze the frequency of photons. • Teacher Prep Time 10 minutes Degree of Difficulty For the average student in AP Physics B, this problem is moderately difficult Class Time Required due to the limited amount of time available in AP Physics B to the study of 25–35 minutes atomic and nuclear physics. Students should be provided with the mass of a proton, speed of light, and the necessary equations located on the AP Technology physics equation sheet. - TI-Nspire™ Learning Handhelds For part C, students should understand the relationship between frequency - TI-Nspire document: and energy of electromagnetic waves, and the relationship between the Ionizing_Radiation.tns speed of these waves, both in wavelength and frequency. Materials Class Time Required AP Physics equation sheet This problem requires 25–35 minutes. -------------------------------- • Introduction: 10 minutes o Read and discuss the background section with the class before Learning Objectives for students work on the problem. AP Physics Atomic and Nuclear Student Work Time: 10–15 minutes • Physics: • Post Discussion: 5–10 minutes - Atomic Physics and Quantum Effects Background NSES This problem is part of a series of problems that apply Math and Science Standards Science @ Work in NASA’s research facilities. - Physical Science The International Space Station (ISS) orbits the Earth at an approximate - Science in Personal and altitude of 407 km (252 mi). At this altitude, astronauts are not as well Social Perspectives protected by the Earth’s atmosphere, and are exposed to higher levels of - History and Nature of space radiation than what is experienced on the Earth’s surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth's Radiation Belts
    Space Sci Rev (2012) 173:103–131 DOI 10.1007/s11214-012-9941-x Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth’s Radiation Belts R.M. Millan · D.N. Baker Received: 16 April 2012 / Accepted: 30 September 2012 / Published online: 25 October 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Discovered in 1958, Earth’s radiation belts persist in being mysterious and un- predictable. This highly dynamic region of near-Earth space provides an important natural laboratory for studying the physics of particle acceleration. Despite the proximity of the ra- diation belts to Earth, many questions remain about the mechanisms responsible for rapidly energizing particles to relativistic energies there. The importance of understanding the ra- diation belts continues to grow as society becomes increasingly dependent on spacecraft for navigation, weather forecasting, and more. We review the historical underpinning and observational basis for our current understanding of particle acceleration in the radiation belts. Keywords Particle acceleration · Radiation belts · Magnetosphere 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Shortly after the discovery of Earth’s radiation belts, the suggestion was put forward that processes occurring locally, in near-Earth space, might be responsible for the high energy particles observed there. Efforts were also carried out to search for an external source that could inject multi-MeV electrons into Earth’s inner magnetosphere where they could then be trapped by the magnetic field. Energetic electrons are in fact observed in interplanetary space, originating at both Jupiter and the sun. However, the electron intensity in Earth’s radiation belts is not correlated with the interplanetary intensity, and a significant external R.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplanetary Conditions Causing Intense Geomagnetic Storms (Dst 100 Nt) During Solar Cycle 23 (1996–2006) E
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, A05221, doi:10.1029/2007JA012744, 2008 Interplanetary conditions causing intense geomagnetic storms (Dst ÀÀÀ100 nT) during solar cycle 23 (1996–2006) E. Echer,1 W. D. Gonzalez,1 B. T. Tsurutani,2 and A. L. C. Gonzalez1 Received 21 August 2007; revised 24 January 2008; accepted 8 February 2008; published 30 May 2008. [1] The interplanetary causes of intense geomagnetic storms and their solar dependence occurring during solar cycle 23 (1996–2006) are identified. During this solar cycle, all intense (Dst À100 nT) geomagnetic storms are found to occur when the interplanetary magnetic field was southwardly directed (in GSM coordinates) for long durations of time. This implies that the most likely cause of the geomagnetic storms was magnetic reconnection between the southward IMF and magnetopause fields. Out of 90 storm events, none of them occurred during purely northward IMF, purely intense IMF By fields or during purely high speed streams. We have found that the most important interplanetary structures leading to intense southward Bz (and intense magnetic storms) are magnetic clouds which drove fast shocks (sMC) causing 24% of the storms, sheath fields (Sh) also causing 24% of the storms, combined sheath and MC fields (Sh+MC) causing 16% of the storms, and corotating interaction regions (CIRs), causing 13% of the storms. These four interplanetary structures are responsible for three quarters of the intense magnetic storms studied. The other interplanetary structures causing geomagnetic storms were: magnetic clouds that did not drive a shock (nsMC), non magnetic clouds ICMEs, complex structures resulting from the interaction of ICMEs, and structures resulting from the interaction of shocks, heliospheric current sheets and high speed stream Alfve´n waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Dynamics in the Earth's Radiation Belts: Review of Current
    INTRODUCTION TO Particle Dynamics in the Earth's Radiation Belts: Review A SPECIAL SECTION of Current Research and Open Questions 10.1029/2019JA026735 J.‐F. Ripoll1, S. G. Claudepierre2,3, A. Y. Ukhorskiy4, C. Colpitts5,X.Li6, J. F. Fennell2, and 7 Special Section: C. Crabtree Particle Dynamics in the Earth's Radiation Belts 1CEA, DAM, DIF, Arpajon, France, 2The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA, USA, 3Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA, 5School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Key Points: 6 7 • We review and discuss current LASP, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA research and open questions relative to Earth's radiation belts • Aspects of modern radiation belt Abstract The past decade transformed our observational understanding of energetic particle processes in research concern particle near‐Earth space. An unprecedented suite of observational systems was in operation including the Van acceleration and transport, particle loss, and the role of nonlinear Allen Probes, Arase, Magnetospheric Multiscale, Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during processes Substorms, Cluster, GPS, GOES, and Los Alamos National Laboratory‐GEO magnetospheric missions. • We also discuss new radiation belt They were supported by conjugate low‐altitude measurements on spacecraft, balloons, and ground‐based modeling capabilities, the fi quantification of model arrays. Together, these signi cantly improved our ability to determine and quantify the mechanisms that uncertainties, and laboratory plasma control the buildup and subsequent variability of energetic particle intensities in the inner magnetosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison
    Radio Science RESEARCH ARTICLE Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: 10.1029/2018RS006589 Comparison of ISIS-II With TDIM Special Section: J. J. Sojka1,2 , D. Rice2 , V. Eccles2 , M. David1 , R. W. Schunk1 , R. F. Benson3 , URSI General Assembly and and H. G. James4 Scientific Symposium (2017) 1Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA, 2Space Environment Corporation, 3 Key Points: Logan, UT, USA, Geospace Physics Laboratory, Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, • The paper focuses on prestorm and Greenbelt, MD, USA, 4Natural Resources Canada Geomagnetic Laboratory, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada main phase topside ionospheric response to a mild and a severe geomagnetic storm Abstract Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is • Simulations from an extensively used associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and F region model, TDIM, are compared fl fi to ISIS-II topside ionosphere ionosphere. One way to observe this energy ow is to look at the ionospheric electron density pro le observations (EDP), especially that of the topside. The altitude location of the ionospheric peak provides additional • Surprisingly, the TDIM is unable to information on the net field-aligned vertical transport at high latitudes. To date, there have been few simulate the observed storm response while satisfactorily studies in which physics-based ionospheric model storm simulations have been compared with topside simulating the prestorm topside EDPs. A rich database of high-latitude topside ionograms obtained from polar orbiting satellites of the International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies (ISIS) program exists but has not been utilized in comparisons with physics-based models.
    [Show full text]