DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ebionites As Depicted in the Pseudo-Clementine Novel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1783-08_JECS_06_Amersfoort 31-03-2009 13:43 Pagina 85 Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 60(1-4), 85-104. doi: 10.2143/JECS.60.1.2035276 © 2008 by Journal of Eastern Christian Studies. All rights reserved. THE EBIONITES AS DEPICTED IN THE PSEUDO-CLEMENTINE NOVEL JAAP VAN AMERSFOORT* Ebionitism is one of the movements opposed as heretical by the authors of the Early Christian Church. This movement and its adherents, the Ebion- ites, were contested by all the heresy hunters. They are mentioned by Irenaeus in his opus magnum Adversus Haereses, where he primarily polemicizes against the Gnostics. He described the Ebionites as denying the divine nature of Jesus Christ and as holding him to be the human son of Joseph and Mary.1 They are also mentioned by Origen2 and the great heresy hunter Epiphanius of Salamis, for whom Ebionitism was one of sixty Christian heresies, for which he could provide an appropriate medicine from his medicine basket, the Panarion. He also believed that the Ebionites viewed Jesus as only human, the son of Joseph and Mary. The Ebionites were also considered heretics by authors of a later generation.3 IS “HERESY” A MEANINGFUL CONCEPT IN THE EARLY CHURCH? Whether Ebionites were correctly considered heretics depends on what is considered heresy. It is usually defined as a doctrine deviating from official doctrine of the Christian Church. It is doubtful, however, whether one can speak of an official doctrine of the Church in the first three centuries of the Christian era. In this period, there was a great variety of religious ideas. The * Jaap van Amersfoort is lecturer emeritus in the History of the Early Church and also taught Latin and Greek. 1 Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses III, 21; W.W. Harvey, Sancti Irenaei Episcopi Lugdunensis libros quinque adversus haereses II (Cambridge, 1857), p. 110: ‘quos sectati Ebionaei, ex Ioseph generatum eum dicunt’. 2 Origenes, C. Celsum II, 1; M. Marcovich, Origenis contra Celsum libri VIII, Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, 54 (Leiden, 2001), p. 372, 28-30: ‘These are the two kinds of Ebionites, some confessing that Jesus was born of a virgin as we do and others who deny this but say that he was born like the other people’. 3 The Ebionites were mentioned and contested, for instance, by Jerome, Philastrius of Brescia, Augustine and Theodoret of Cyrrhus. 1783-08_JECS_06_Amersfoort 31-03-2009 13:43 Pagina 86 86 JAAP VAN AMERSFOORT local Christian churches differed from one another so much that what one church considered heretical another held to be orthodox. For instance, the Western part of the Roman Empire soon considered Gnosticism heretical, whereas the East did not condemn this movement. In the middle of the second century, the Church of Rome excommunicated Marcion as a heretic and returned all the money he had given to it.4 The Gnostic Valentinus taught freely in the Church of Alexandria, which was largely heretical accord- ing to Walter Bauer5 and where Gnostic doctrines were not considered incom- patible with orthodoxy. After some years he separated from the Church of Rome. According to Bauer, Gnostic heresies predominated in several local churches in the first centuries of our Christian era,6 though later orthodox church doctrine was spread from the West. Thus what was later called hereti- cal may have been a major component of the life and the doctrine of the Christian church. Research in this field cannot therefore be neglected. We are largely indebted for this insight to the eighteenth century church historian Gottfried Arnold for what he wrote in his Unparteiische Kirchen und Ketzer- historie.7 WHO WERE THE EBIONITES? The literature contains two definitions of Ebionite. Both set them in the Jewish Christian community. Irenaeus and Epiphanius considered them adher- ents of a movement within Jewish Christianity, namely the movement that holds Jesus to be only human, the natural son of Joseph and Mary. Another group within Jewish Christianity admitted the divine origin of Christ and the 4 Cf. Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem IV, 4, 3: ‘cum et pecuniam in primo calore fidei catholicae ecclesiae contulit, proiectam mox cum ipso, posteaquam in haeresim suam a nostra veritate descivit’. 5 Walter Bauer, Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (Tübingen, 1934; 21964), p. 57: ‘Es gab also in Ägypten am Anfang des 2. Jahrhunderts – wie lange zuvor schon, entzieht sich unserer Kenntnis – Heidenchristen neben Judenchristen beider Reli- gion auf synkretistisch-gnostischer Grundlage ruhend, …’. 6 Among others in Syrian Edessa, where the Marcionite church would have been the ear- liest one, and in Asia Minor, where several Gnostic sects were active. 7 Gottfried Arnold, Gottfrid Arnolds unparteyische Kirchen- und Ketzer-Historie: vom Anfang des Neuen Testaments biß auf das Jahr Christi 1688 (Frankfurt a.M., 1700-1715). 1783-08_JECS_06_Amersfoort 31-03-2009 13:43 Pagina 87 THE EBIONITES AS DEPICTED IN THE PSEUDO-CLEMENTINE NOVEL 87 virgin birth.8 According to a second definition, the term Ebionites means all Jewish Christians. The word ebion means “poor, humble” and was associated with the poor of Jerusalem, i.e. the first Church of Jerusalem.9 According to Tertullian and Epiphanius, however, this term was associated with a certain Ebion, who founded this sect within Jewish Christianity.10 J.-M. Magnin treats this question in a series of four articles in the periodical Proche-Orient Chrétien, in which he also surveys the history of Jewish Christianity and sug- gests that the movement could be one of the roots of Islam.11 ORIGINS OF THE EBIONITE GOSPEL Epiphanius mentions that the Ebionites used a gospel called the Hebrew Gospel, which they claimed as the Gospel of St Matthew.12 He gives several quotations from this Gospel. Whether this Gospel is dependent on the canon- ical gospels, as Joseph Verheyden still recently stated,13 or whether it contains an independent tradition of the words of Jesus is a matter of debate. It cer- 8 On the Nazoraeans see Petri Luomanen, ‘Nazarenes’, in A Companion to Second-Century Christian “Heretics”, eds. Antti Marjanen and Petri Luomanen, Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, 76 (Leiden – Boston, 2005), pp. 279-314. 9 Cf. Origenes, De Principiis IV, 3, 8; P. Koetschau, Origenes Werke V, de principiis, GCS, 22 (Leipzig, 1913), p. 334, 14-15: ‘id est Hebionitae, qui etiam ipso nomine pauperes appel- lantur (Hebion namque pauper apud Hebraeos interpraetatur)’. 10 Tertullianus, De praescr. haer. X, 8, CC, 1, p. 196, 19; De carne Christi 14, 5, CC, 2, p. 900, 35; Epiphanius, Panarion, 30, 2, 1; Karl Holl, Epiphanius, Ancoratus und Panarion I, GCS, 22 (Leipzig, 1913), p. 334, 7. 11 J.-M. Magnin, ‘Notes sur l’Ébionisme’, Proche Orient Chrétien, 23 (1973), pp. 232- 265; 24 (1974), pp. 225-250; 25 (1975), pp. 245-273; 28 (1978), pp. 220-248. On the Ebionites see also Simon C. Mimouni, Le judéo-christianisme ancien. Essais historiques, Patrimoines (Paris, 1998), pp. 257-286; Richard Bauckham, ‘The Origin of the Ebionites’, in The Image of the Judaeo-Christians in Ancien Jewish and Christian Literature, eds. Peter J. Tomson and Doris Lamberts-Petry, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Tes- tament, 158 (Tübingen, 2003), pp. 162-181; Sakari Häkkinen, ‘Ebionites’, in A Com- panion, pp. 247-278; Simon C. Mimouni, Les chrétiens d’origine juive dans l’antiquité, Présences du Judaisme, 29 (Paris, 2004), pp. 161-194. 12 Epiphanius, Panarion 30, 13, 1-2; Holl, I, pp. 348, 32 – 349, 4. 13 See his article ‘Epiphanius on the Ebionites’, in The Image of the Judaeo-Christians, pp. 182-208, here 189: ‘There can be little doubt about it that the author of GE must have been acquainted with at least the gospels of Matthew and of Luke. It is also quite obvious from the fragments that, as a rule, canonical Mt is the author’s primary source and guide. In so far, GE could be called “their gospel of Matthew”.’ 1783-08_JECS_06_Amersfoort 31-03-2009 13:43 Pagina 88 88 JAAP VAN AMERSFOORT tainly preserves synoptic material, so that it might be based on a gospel har- mony. Daniel A. Bertrand claimed that the Gospel of the Ebionites was a har- mony of the three Synoptic Gospels written before Tatian composed his Diatessaron,14 whereas the Gospel Harmony of Tatian made use also of the Gospel of St John. Bertrand thoroughly analysed the fragments to demon- strate elements of all three Synoptic Gospels, which were in the text sequence of Matthew. Moreover the text also contained some apocryphal elements. ‘L’EE considère les trois synoptiques, tandis que le Diatessaron englobe les qua- tre évangiles; le premier se règle sur Matthieu, cependant que le second préfère Jean (ou du moins superpose un cadre johannique à une trame matthéenne). En revanche ni l’un ni l’autre ne reculent devant l’intégration de données apocryphes neutres, comme les embellissements légendaires; et tous deux profitent même de leur travail rédactionnel pour introduire des corrections doctrinales, encratites notamment’.15 This theory of Bertrand has evoked various reactions. Philippe Henne questioned whether this gospel could be a harmony.16 He viewed the Gospel of the Ebionites as ‘une fausse harmonie, une vraie supercherie’, as an exam- ple of a modest but effective adaptation of the gospel text to existing tradi- tions. He dwells on the story of the baptism of Jesus, which was adapted to the views of the Ebionites. Their version of the story clearly denied that Jesus had a divine nature. ‘L’Évangile des Ébionites, tel qu’Épiphane le rapporte, est un bon exemple d’adap- tation discrète mais efficace de traditions préexistantes. Le baptême de Jésus, qui embarrasse les Évangiles synoptiques, devient sous la plume de l’auteur apoc- ryphe un récit narrant l’investiture messianique de Jésus et rejetant sa possible nature divine’.17 14 Daniel A.
Recommended publications
  • Hérésies : Une Construction D’Identités Religieuses

    Hérésies : Une Construction D’Identités Religieuses

    Hérésies : une construction d’identités religieuses Quelles sortes de communautés réunissent les hommes ? Comment sont- elles construites ? Où est l’unité, où est la multiplicité de l’humanité ? Les hommes peuvent former des communautés distinctes, antagonistes, s’opposant violemment. La division externe est-elle nécessaire pour bâtir une cohésion interne ? Rien n’est plus actuel que ces questions. Parmi toutes ces formes de dissensions, les études qui composent ce volume s’intéressent à l’hérésie. L’hérésie se caractérise par sa relativité. Nul ne se revendique hérétique, sinon par provocation. Le qualificatif d’hérétique est toujours subi par celui qui le porte et il est toujours porté DYE BROUWER, GUILLAUME CHRISTIAN PAR EDITE ROMPAEY VAN ET ANJA Hérésies : une construction sur autrui. Cela rend l’hérésie difficilement saisissable si l’on cherche ce qu’elle est en elle-même. Mais le phénomène apparaît avec davantage de clarté si l’on analyse les discours qui l’utilisent. Se dessinent dès lors les d’identités religieuses représentations qui habitent les auteurs de discours sur l’hérésie et les hérétiques, discours généralement sous-tendus par une revendication à EDITE PAR CHRISTIAN BROUWER, GUILLAUME DYE ET ANJA VAN ROMPAEY l’orthodoxie. Hérésie et orthodoxie forment ainsi un couple, désuni mais inséparable. Car du point de vue de l’orthodoxie, l’hérésie est un choix erroné, une déviation, voire une déviance. En retour, c’est bien parce qu’un courant se proclame orthodoxe que les courants concurrents peuvent être accusés d’hérésie. Sans opinion correcte, pas de choix déviant. La thématique de l’hérésie s’inscrit ainsi dans les questions de recherche sur l’altérité religieuse.
  • Charts on the Book of Revelation Is a Useful Supplement to Courses on the Book of Revelation in Both the Church and the Academy

    Charts on the Book of Revelation Is a Useful Supplement to Courses on the Book of Revelation in Both the Church and the Academy

    “Charts on the Book of Revelation is a useful supplement to courses on the book of Revelation in both the church and the academy. Wilson’s charts cover a range of historical, literary, rhetorical, and interpretive issues that will guide the careful student in making more viable interpretations of this difficult yet enriching book. An excellent resource to use with today’s visual learners as they approach this highly visual book for study.” —ROBERT WALTER WALL The Paul T. Walls Professor of Biblical and Wesleyan Studies Chair, Department of Christian Scriptures Seattle Pacific University Author of Revelation in the New International Biblical Commentary series “This is an enormously helpful book, bringing together in visual form extensive comparative data both from and about Revelation. Not to be confused with prophecy charts of a bygone era, here we find charts on everything from various views of authorship and date to extensive lists of scriptural allusions and verbal parallels, from John’s use of symbols and numbers to all references to angels and demons—and much else—seventy-nine in all. Each is carefully annotated with the source of the information. While the parallels are not always convinc- ing, they always provide an interesting place to start and will save the reader much time in collecting data.” —DAVID L. BArr Brage Golding Distinguished Professor Wright State University Editor of Reading the Book of Revelation “Wilson’s Charts on the Book of Revelation synthesizes an enormous amount of material relevant to the study of the Revelation of John and makes it available in a clear, useful, and unusual format for students of the Bible.” —DAVID E.
  • Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University

    Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria Jonathan Stephen Morgan Marquette University Recommended Citation Morgan, Jonathan Stephen, "Circumcision of the Spirit in the Soteriology of Cyril of Alexandria" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 277. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/277 CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA by Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT CIRCUMCISION OF THE SPIRIT IN THE SOTERIOLOGY OF CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA Jonathan S. Morgan, B.S., M.A. Marquette University, 2013 In this dissertation I argue that Cyril of Alexandria’s interpretation of “spiritual circumcision” provides invaluable insight into his complex doctrine of salvation. Spiritual Circumcision – or Circumcision by the Spirit -- is a recurring theme throughout his extensive body of exegetical literature, which was written before the Nestorian controversy (428). When Cyril considers the meaning and scope of circumcision, he recognizes it as a type that can describe a range of salvific effects. For him, circumcision functions as a unifying concept that ties together various aspects of salvation such as purification, sanctification, participation, and freedom. Soteriology, however, can only be understood in relation to other doctrines. Thus, Cyril’s discussions of circumcision often include correlative areas of theology such as hamartiology and Trinitarian thought. In this way, Cyril’s discussions on circumcision convey what we are saved from, as well as the Trinitarian agency of our salvation.
  • The-Gospel-Of-Mary.Pdf

    The-Gospel-Of-Mary.Pdf

    OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN GOSPEL TEXTS General Editors Christopher Tuckett Andrew Gregory This page intentionally left blank The Gospel of Mary CHRISTOPHER TUCKETT 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox26dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Christopher Tuckett, 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services Ltd., Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk ISBN 978–0–19–921213–2 13579108642 Series Preface Recent years have seen a signiWcant increase of interest in non- canonical gospel texts as part of the study of early Christianity.
  • Early Christianity in Transjordan

    Early Christianity in Transjordan

    Tyndale Bulletin 45.1 (1994) 97-117. EARLY CHRISTIANITY IN TRANSJORDAN Bastiaan Van Elderen Summary Considerable archaeological field work is currently being conducted in the area of the Decapolis, including the author’s involvement in the excavations of Abila. This article reviews the few references to northern Transjordan in the New Testament and the references in early Christian literature which suggest that Jewish Christianity flourished in Transjordan in the early Christian centuries. Archaeological evidence indicates a rich floruit of Byzantine Christianity in Transjordan. A study of literary allusions relating to this area and the current archaeological work promise new light on this little-known phase of early Christianity. One of the blank pages in ancient church history is the beginning stages of the movement of Christianity to the east. The movement of Christianity as presented in the Acts of the Apostles was to the west. Nothing is reported about the movement of Christianity to the south apart from the report of the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch; or of the movement to the east apart from the report of Christians in Damascus whom Saul sought to apprehend. On the other hand, there are some scattered references in the literature of the early church. In view of increasing archaeological work in the Transjordan area it may be useful to assemble some of these data from the literary sources to provide a framework in which to evaluate this current and future archaeological work. Perhaps a word of caution is in order first of all. Archaeological data relating to pre-Constantinian Christianity are extremely limited.
  • Arianism and Political Power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic Kingdoms

    Arianism and Political Power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic Kingdoms

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2012 Reign of heretics: Arianism and political power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic kingdoms Christopher J. (Christopher James) Nofziger Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Nofziger, Christopher J. (Christopher James), "Reign of heretics: Arianism and political power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic kingdoms" (2012). WWU Graduate School Collection. 244. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/244 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reign of Heretics: Arianism and Political Power in the Vandal and Ostrogothic Kingdoms By Christopher James Nofziger Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Peter Diehl Dr. Amanda Eurich Dr. Sean Murphy MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non- exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files.
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official

    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official

    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
  • Triumph in Defeat: Lost Origins of Jesus Sayings

    Triumph in Defeat: Lost Origins of Jesus Sayings

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Japanese Journal of Policy and Culture Vol. 26 (March 2018) 1 Triumph in Defeat: Lost Origins of Jesus’ Sayings Mark N. ZION Synopsis John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth proclaimed the arrival of a new kingdom for fi rst-century Palestine. Both turned away from the violence of Zealots (resistance fi ghters) and preached a higher way, creating in the process universal ideals. Working together, they launched a transformative moment in human history that is still shaping the world. John offered repentance to enter this newly forming kingdom and Jesus gave the lifestyle injunctions for how to live in it, for both believed that an age of peace and justice was about to begin. As Christianity developed early in the second-century CE, with Paul of Tarsus’ message of a completely spiritual kingdom, it appropriated John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth’s vision into its own framework and so severely contextualized it. Yet, the teachings of John and Jesus were too dynamic to keep under wraps for long and have tumbled out again and again in new ways. Studies of these origins have signifi cant applications for our time: how words and symbols have the power to inspire throughout the ages, how to sift through a mythology for core truths, the horrors of prejudice when combined with religious ideologies, even of how to approach ancient cultures for a greater understanding. Here I will consider a little of how these teachings originated and a few of those at the center of it.
  • Efm Vocabulary

    Efm Vocabulary

    EfM EDUCATION for MINISTRY ST. FRANCIS-IN-THE-VALLEY EPISCOPAL CHURCH VOCABULARY (Main sources: EFM Years 1-4; Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church; An Episcopal Dictionary of the Church; The American Heritage Dictionary) Aaronic blessing – “The Lord bless you and keep you . “ Abba – Aramaic for “Father”. A more intimate form of the word “Father”, used by Jesus in addressing God in the Lord’s Prayer. (27B) To call God Abba is the sign of trust and love, according to Paul. abbot – The superior of a monastery. accolade – The ceremonial bestowal of knighthood, made akin to a sacrament by the church in the 13th century. aeskesis –An Eastern training of the Christian spirit which creates the state of openness to God and which leaves a rapturous experience of God. aesthetic – ( As used by Kierkegaard in its root meaning) pertaining to feeling, responding to life on the immediate sensual level, seeing pleasure and avoiding pain. (aesthetics) – The study of beauty, ugliness, the sublime. affective domain – That part of the human being that pertains to affection or emotion. agape – The love of God or Christ; also, Christian love. aggiornamento – A term (in Italian meaning “renewal”) and closely associated with Pope John XXIII and Vatican II, it denotes a fresh presentation of the faith, together with a recognition of the wide natural rights of human being and support of freedom of worship and the welfare state. akedia – (Pronounced ah-kay-DEE-ah) Apathy, boredom, listlessness, the inability to train the soul because one no longer cares, usually called “accidie” (AX-i-dee) in English.
  • What the Religions Named in the Qur'ān Can Tell Us

    What the Religions Named in the Qur'ān Can Tell Us

    WHAT THE RELIGIONS NAMED IN THE QUR’ĀN CAN TELL US ABOUT THE EARLIEST UNDERSTANDING OF “ISLAM” A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Humanities By Micah David Collins B.A., Wright State University, 2009 2012 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 20, 2012 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Micah David Collins ENTITLED What the Religions Named In The Qur’an Can Tell Us About The Earliest Understanding of “Islam” BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Masters of Humanities. _______________________ Awad Halabi, Ph.D. Project Director _______________________ Ava Chamberlain, Ph.D. Director, Masters of Humanities Program College of Liberal Arts Committee on Final Examination: _______________________ Awad Halabi, Ph.D. _______________________ David Barr, Ph.D. _______________________ Mark Verman, Ph.D. _______________________ Andrew T. Hsu, Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Collins, Micah. M.A. Humanities Department, Masters of Humanities Program, Wright State University, 2012. What The Religions Named In The Qur’ān Can Tell Us About The Earliest Understanding of “Islam”. Both Western studies of Islam as well as Muslim beliefs assert that the Islamic holy text, the Qur’ān, endeavored to inaugurate a new religion, separate and distinct from the Jewish and Christian religions. This study, however, demonstrates that the Qur’ān affirms a continuity of beliefs with the earlier revealed texts that suggest that the revelations collected in the Qur’ān did not intend to define a distinct and separate religion. By studying the various historical groups named in the Qur’ān – such as the Yahūd, Ṣabī’ūn, and Naṣārā – we argue that the use of the term “islam” in the Qur’ān relates more to the general action of “submission” to the monotheistic beliefs engaged in by existing Jewish and Nazarene communities within Arabia.
  • “Sect” of Nazarenes Was First Described by Epiphanius of Salamis in His Panarion (Ca

    “Sect” of Nazarenes Was First Described by Epiphanius of Salamis in His Panarion (Ca

    Historiography A heretical “sect” of Nazarenes was first described by Epiphanius of Salamis in his Panarion (ca. 377). In Epiphanius’ view the Nazarenes were predecessors of the Ebionites. F.C. Baur’s critical study challenged this traditional picture by claiming that the Ebionies were the genuine successors of the first Christians in Jerusalem and the Nazarenes were their more orthodox followers (Baur 1966 [= 1860], 174), while A. Ritschl defended the traditional order (Ritschl, 1857, 152–154). Both these options have received support in later research (e.g. Pritz, 1988, 108–110; Lüdemann, 1996, 52–56). More recent research has emphasized the necessity to read the testimonies of the church fathers in their historical setting paying attention to the way the fathers relied on their predecessors heresiological treatises, before making any conclusions about the actual course of events (e.g. Luomanen, 2012 and 2017). Terminology(H1) In scholarly literature, the sect discussed in this entry is most often termed either Nazoreans or Nazarenes. Nazoreans is closer to the Greek form of the name in patristic sources, Ναζωραίοι/Nazōraioi. On the other hand, most English translations use the form Nazarene/Nazarenes when referring to Jesus’ byname derived from his hometown (Matt 2:23) and to the “sect of the Nazarenes” (Acts 24:5). Because the surviving literary sources link the name of the sect to Jesus’ hometown (see below), the form Nazarenes (reflecting the Latin Nazareus/Nazarei) is used here. A word of caution is in order concerning the term sect. Patristic authors regarded the Nazarenes as heretics, but in the present context the term does not imply any value judgment.
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Epiphanius’ Alogi and the Question of Early Ecclesiastical Opposition to the Johannine Corpus By T. Scott Manor Ph.D. Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2012 Declaration I composed this thesis, the work is my own. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or qualification. Name……………………………….. Date……………………………………… 2 ABSTRACT The Johannine literature has been a cornerstone of Christian theology throughout the history of the church. However it is often argued that the church in the late second century and early third century was actually opposed to these writings because of questions concerning their authorship and role within “heterodox” theologies. Despite the axiomatic status that this so-called “Johannine Controversy” has achieved, there is surprisingly little evidence to suggest that the early church actively opposed the Johannine corpus.