RERL Fact Sheet 1, Community Wind Technology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RERL Fact Sheet 1, Community Wind Technology Renewable Energy Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Wind Power: Wind Technology Today Community Wind Power on the Community Scale Wind Power Fact Sheet # 1 RERL—MTC Community Wind Wind Power Technology for Fact Sheet Series Communities In collaboration with the Mas- sachusetts Technology Col- This introduction to wind power technology is We also recommend a visit to a modern wind laborative’s Renewable Energy meant to help communities begin considering or power installation – it will answer many of your Trust Fund, the Renewable planning wind power. It focuses on commercial initial questions, including size, noise levels, foot- Energy Research Lab (RERL) and medium-scale wind turbine technology avail- print, and local impact. Some possible field trips able in the United States. are listed on the back page. brings you this series of fact sheets about Wind Power on the community scale: Wind Power Today 1. Technology 2. Performance Wind power is a growing industry, and the technol- 3. Impacts & Issues ogy has changed considerably in recent decades. 4. Siting What would a typical commercial-scale* turbine 5. Resource Assessment installed today look like? 6. Wind Data • Design - 3 blades 7. Permitting - Tubular tower The focus of this series of fact • Hub-height - 164 - 262 ft (50 - 80 m) sheets is medium- • Diameter: - 154 - 262 ft (47 - 80 m) and commercial- • Power ratings available in the US: scale wind. - 660 kW - 1.8 MW * Other scales are discussed below. A wind turbine’s height is usually described as the height of the center of the rotor, or hub. Inside this Edition: Technology Size Ranges What do we mean here when we say “community-scale wind power”? Introduction p. 1 Windpower can be divided into three size ranges, • Diameter: 13 - 30 m (43 - 100 ft) Wind Power Today p. 1 which are used for different applications. The focus • Height: 35 - 50 m (115 - 164 ft) of this series of fact sheets is medium and commer- • Example: 597,000 kWh/year cial-scale wind power. The size is chosen differ- Size ranges p. 1 Commercial scale: 500 kW - 2 MW ently depending on the turbine’s purpose. Typical • Usually fed into the grid, not sized to a single Vocabulary p. 2 sizes in the three ranges available in the US are: Residential: below 30 kW load • Diameter: 47 - 90 m (155 - 300 ft) Power & Energy p. 3 • Choose a size based on electrical load • Diameter: 1 - 13 m (4 - 43 ft) • Height: 50 - 80 m (164 - 262 ft) Sources for Teachers & p. 4 • Height: 18 - 37 m (60 - 120 ft) • Example: 4,300,000 kWh/year For comparison, an average Massachusetts house- Kids • Example: 21,000 kWh/year hold uses 7,200 kWh/year Nearby Wind p. 4 Medium: 30 - 500 kW Example annual production is for comparison only. Based on sea- Installations • May be sized to a load. Typically used when level mean winds of 7m/s (15.6 mph); manufacturer’s data for the For More Info p. 4 there is a large electrical load. following turbines: Residential: Bergey XL-S (7.5kW); Medium: Fuhrländer FL 250 (250 kW); Commercial: GE 1.5 SL (1500 kW) . Page 2 Community Wind Power Fact Sheet #1 The Vocabulary of Wind Power Turbine: a turbine is a device that converts the Up-wind turbines: Modern commercial tur- kinetic energy of a moving fluid into rota- bines yaw themselves so the rotor is facing tional energy (engineers call both liquids and into the wind, i.e. upwind of the tower. gases “fluids” – i.e. things that flow). A Cut-in speed: the wind speed at which a wind wind turbine’s blades use aerodynamic lift turbine begins to generate electricity. Typi- and drag to capture some of the wind’s en- cally 4 m/s (9 mph) for commercial wind ergy and turn the generator’s shaft. turbines. The main parts of a typical wind turbine are: Cut-out wind speed: the - Rotor: a wind tur- high wind speed at which bine’s blades and the turbine must shut the hub to which down and turn perpen- they attach form dicular to the wind to the rotor. protect itself from being - Nacelle: the frame overpowered. Typically and housing at the 25 m/s (56 mph) top of the tower. It Variable-speed turbines: protects the gear- Some turbines incorpo- box and the gen- rate power electronics erator from that allow them to opti- weather, and helps mize their power output control the me- by varying their speed, chanical noise for instance, from 10 to level. 20 rpm. Other types vary -Tower: a steel struc- their speed little or not at ture, typically all. tubular, with a Variable blade pitch: ladder up the in- many turbines can change side for mainte- the angle of their blades nance access. to optimize performance. -Base or foundation: Horizontal axis: All com- made of concrete mercial-scale turbines reinforced with today have the rotor turn steel bars. Typi- around a horizontal axis. cally either a shal- Historically, vertical axis low flat disk or a turbines have been tested, deeper cylinder. such as the “Darrieus” egg-beater design, but have not been as efficient Diagram courtesyofJames Rowe Other useful terms are: or able to survive high winds. Yaw: commercial-scale turbines have a motor Penetration: The amount of wind energy in a to yaw, or turn the rotor to face into the given area of the grid, as a percentage of wind. At high wind-speeds, they yaw out of total production. In the US, wind penetration the wind to protect themselves. is under 1%. Northern Germany and parts of Denmark have penetrations of around 20% (2003 figures). Renewable Energy Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Wind Technology Today Page 3 The Power & Energy in Wind The Power in Wind The Power from a Wind Turbine The first law of thermodynamics tells us that The power a turbine actually gets from the energy can neither be created nor destroyed, wind is: Energy but it can change forms. Anything that is in 3 P = Cp ½ U A motion – such as moving air – contains a form is the ability to change one- You can see that we have added two things to of energy we refer self or one's surroundings to as kinetic en- the original equation of the power in the wind: ergy. Slowing air Cp = the turbine’s power coefficient down reduces its = eta = the turbine’s mechanical & elec- kinetic energy and trical efficiencies. that energy has to go somewhere. Cp must be less than the Betz limit. In practice, Power Wind turbines it varies with wind speed, turbulence and oper- slow wind down and convert some of the en- ating characteristics; for example it could be is a rate of using or produc- ergy to mechanical and electrical energy. around 44% for a commercial-scale turbine, in ing energy. winds of 10 m/s. A typical overall efficiency, Kinetic energy is: , would be in the range of 90%. Power = energy / time 2 KE = ½ mU To estimate the power output of a given com- where m stands for mass (in kg) and U stands mercial turbine, we do not have to use the for velocity (in m/s). This allows us to calcu- power equation; rather we use power curves supplied by the manufacturer. late the amount of power in moving air. The Units of Measure power of the wind passing perpendicularly Wind Turbine Power Curve through a circular area is: 1,600 1,400 A kilowatt-hour (kWh) is a 3 P = ½ U A 1,200 unit of Energy 1,000 Where: 800 A kilowatt (kW) is a unit of P = the power of the wind (in Watts). 600 Power. So are watts, mega- Power (kW) Power 400 3 watts, and horsepower. = rho = the density of the air (in kg/m ) 200 (1.225 kg/m3 for dry air at sea level) - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 U = the velocity of the wind measured in m/s Wind Speed (m/s) A = r2 = the area swept by the circular rotor, in square meters, and What does the power equation tell us? = pi = 3.1416... Even though we do not use the power equation r = the radius (half the diameter) of the to calculate power output of a particular tur- rotor (in meters) bine, the power equation tells us useful infor- mation about significant factors that determine Betz’s Limit on what we can extract what we can get from a wind turbine: A wind turbine slows air down, but it cannot U3 : The power available in the wind is propor- remove 100% of the air’s kinetic energy – tional to the cube of the wind speed. There obviously the air cannot stop completely, or is much more energy in high-speed winds else it would pile up behind the turbine. In than in slow winds. 1919 German physicist Albert Betz figured A : Power is proportional to the swept area, out that the upper limit to the amount of en- and to the square of the diameter. Dou- ergy you can capture from the wind is 16/27 bling the diameter quadruples the avail- or about 59%. In practice, all real wind tur- able power. bines extract less than this hypothetical maxi- mum. : Air density matters too. The lower density of warmer air, and air at higher altitudes somewhat reduces the power available in the wind. Renewable Energy Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Page 4 Community Wind Power Fact Sheet #1 Renewable Sources for Teachers & Kids Energy Research Spirit Lake, Iowa, has 2 wind turbines on their Scholastic books offers wind energy activities for Laboratory school grounds.
Recommended publications
  • A Method That Lends Wings
    FLASHBACK_Aerodynamics A method that lends wings Mathematician Irmgard Flügge-Lotz was one of the first female researchers in the field of aerodynamics and automatic control. While working at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Flow Research, she succeeded in simplifying the calculations required for aircraft construction. Flügge-Lotz was later appointed the first female Professor of Engineering at Stanford University. In the U.S., her work is still held in high esteem. In Germany, however, she has been all but forgotten. TEXT KATJA ENGEL Goettingen, 1931. Leading flow researcher could only be tested by means of complex Ludwig Prandtl was astonished. His colleague, wind tunnel measurements. Ludwig Prandtl, at 28 just half his age, had just handed him who is generally thought to be the founder of the solution to a mathematical puzzle that no- aircraft aerodynamics, and his team in Goet- body had been able to crack for more than ten tingen carried out pioneering work on the years. This conundrum was on his “menu”, as theoretical description of lift. However, math- he called his list of uncompleted research ematical calculations of his wing theory tasks. The result went down in the history of turned out to be difficult. In 1919, Albert Betz, aerodynamic research together with the a doctoral student in Goettingen who was young researcher's name. The "Lotz method" later to become Prandtl’s successor at the In- makes it possible to calculate the lift on an air- stitute, finally succeeded in the describing lift plane wing with comparative ease. by means of differential equations. However, Prandtl soon made the woman who had so his formulae were too complex for practical impressed him an (unofficial) Head of Depart- use when constructing new profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Management of Flap-Edge Trailing Vortices*
    4th Flow Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, June 23-26, 2008 Active Management of Flap-Edge Trailing Vortices* David Greenblatt Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel Chung-Sheng Yao† NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton VA, USA Stefan Vey,‡ Oliver C. Paschereit¶ Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany Robert Meyer§ German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany The vortex hazard produced by large airliners and increasingly larger airliners entering service, combined with projected rapid increases in the demand for air transportation, is expected to act as a major impediment to increased air traffic capacity. Significant reduction in the vortex hazard is possible, however, by employing active vortex alleviation techniques that reduce the wake severity by dynamically modifying its vortex characteristics, providing that the techniques do not degrade performance or compromise safety and ride quality. With this as background, a series of experiments were performed, initially at NASA Langley Research Center and subsequently at the Berlin University of Technology in collaboration with the German Aerospace Center. The investigations demonstrated the basic mechanism for managing trailing vortices using retrofitted devices that are decoupled from conventional control surfaces. The basic premise for managing vortices advanced here is rooted in the erstwhile forgotten hypothesis of Albert Betz, as extended and verified ingeniously by Coleman duPont Donaldson and his collaborators. Using these devices, vortices may be perturbed at arbitrarily long wavelengths down to wavelengths less than a typical airliner wingspan and the oscillatory loads on the wings, and hence the vehicle, are small. Significant flexibility in the specific device has been demonstrated using local passive and active separation control as well as local circulation control via Gurney flaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimenting Close to the Wind
    FLASHBACK_Aerodynamics Experimenting Close to the Wind Wind energy is a technology with a future – and with origins that can be traced far back into the past. One of its pioneers was Albert Betz, who was a Director at the Max Planck Institute for Fluid Dynamics in Göttingen from 1947 to 1956. TEXT MICHAEL GLOBIG “When, after the war, our economy was be allowed to flow through without reduc- Inspired by the sophisticated criteria for suffering acutely from the general shortage ing the air speed at all – in which case, aircraft propellers, in the mid-1920s Betz of coal, attention once again turned more once again, no energy would be “tapped.” turned his attention to windmill sails and eagerly to other sources of energy. In addi- discovered that these are subject to the tion to the development of hydropower, it GÖTTINGEN BECOMES THE same laws as propellers: a propeller driven was primarily recommended to make CENTER OF EXISTENCE by an engine creates air pressure, whereas greater use of wind energy. This interest windmills rotate in response to natural air continued even after the coal shortage was It can thus be assumed that, between pressure. Exactly the same aerodynamic overcome.” Albert Betz, who wrote these these two extremes, there must be an area laws apply to both and can be calculated lines, was himself one of the pioneers of in which mechanical energy can be extract- using the same equations. However, wind- wind power. It was he who postulated a ed by slowing the wind down. Upon closer mills with sails that exhibit an exact pro- law, now named after him, that no engi- examination, it becomes apparent that peller shape have a very low starting neer can afford to ignore.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter on Prandtl
    2 Prandtl and the Gottingen¨ school Eberhard Bodenschatz and Michael Eckert 2.1 Introduction In the early decades of the 20th century Gottingen¨ was the center for mathemat- ics. The foundations were laid by Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777–1855) who from 1808 was head of the observatory and professor for astronomy at the Georg August University (founded in 1737). At the turn of the 20th century, the well- known mathematician Felix Klein (1849–1925), who joined the University in 1886, established a research center and brought leading scientists to Gottingen.¨ In 1895 David Hilbert (1862–1943) became Chair of Mathematics and in 1902 Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909) joined the mathematics department. At that time, pure and applied mathematics pursued diverging paths, and mathemati- cians at Technical Universities were met with distrust from their engineering colleagues with regard to their ability to satisfy their practical needs (Hensel, 1989). Klein was particularly eager to demonstrate the power of mathematics in applied fields (Prandtl, 1926b; Manegold, 1970). In 1905 he established an Institute for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics in Gottingen¨ by bringing the young Ludwig Prandtl (1875–1953) and the more senior Carl Runge (1856– 1927), both from the nearby Hanover. A picture of Prandtl at his water tunnel around 1935 is shown in Figure 2.1. Prandtl had studied mechanical engineering at the Technische Hochschule (TH, Technical University) in Munich in the late 1890s. In his studies he was deeply influenced by August Foppl¨ (1854–1924), whose textbooks on tech- nical mechanics became legendary. After finishing his studies as mechanical engineer in 1898, Prandtl became Foppl’s¨ assistant and remained closely re- lated to him throughout his life, intellectually by his devotion to technical mechanics and privately as Foppl’s¨ son-in-law (Vogel-Prandtl, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Minimum Induced Drag of Wings
    On the Minimum Induced Drag of Wings Albion H. Bowers NASA Dryden Flight Research Center AIAA/SFTE AV Chapters Lancaster, CA 16 August, 2007 Introduction λ The History of Spanload Development of the optimum spanload Winglets and their implications λ Horten Sailplanes λ Flight Mechanics & Adverse yaw λ Concluding Remarks History λ Bird Flight as the Model for Flight λ Vortex Model of Lifting Surfaces λ Optimization of Spanload Prandtl Prandtl/Horten/Jones Klein/Viswanathan λ Winglets - Whitcomb Birds Bird Flight as a Model or “Why don’t birds have vertical tails?” λ Propulsion Flapping motion to produce thrust Wings also provide lift Dynamic lift - birds use this all the time (easy for them, hard for us) λ Stability and Control Still not understood in literature Lack of vertical surfaces λ Birds as an Integrated System Structure Propulsion Lift (performance) Stability and control Dynamic Lift Early Mechanical Flight λ Otto & Gustav Lilienthal (1891-1896) λ Octave Chanute (1896-1903) λ Samuel P Langley (1896-1903) λ Wilbur & Orville Wright (1899-1905) Otto Lilienthal λ Glider experiments 1891 - 1896 Dr Samuel Pierpont Langley λ Aerodrome experiments 1887-1903 Octave Chanute λ Gliding experiments 1896 to 1903 Wilbur & Orville Wright λ Flying experiments 1899 to 1905 Spanload Development λ Ludwig Prandtl Development of the boundary layer concept (1903) Developed the “lifting line” theory Developed the concept of induced drag Calculated the spanload for minimum induced drag (1908?) Published in open literature (1920) λ Albert Betz Published
    [Show full text]
  • Schnellflug- Und Pfeilflügeltechnik
    Der weitere Rundgang in der Halle 2 - die Schnellflugausstellung und die Geschichte der aerodynamischen Pfeilflügeltechnik mit der durch sie veränderten Welt Bevor wir Sie weiter durch unsere Ausstellung führen, wollen wir Sie ein wenig über die Hintergründe unserer Arbeit vertraut machen. Wir benötigen dafür Fachwissen mit breitem Hintergrund, und das müssen wir zusammen- tragen. Im Lauf der letzten 25 Jahre ist das eine stattliche Menge geworden und wird in unserem Archiv in einem Nebengebäude bearbeitet und verwaltet. Selbstverständlich müssen schon Grundkenntnisse durch eine längere Beschäftigung mit diesem komplexen Thema vorhanden sein, seien es technische, historische oder noch andere Zugänge. Unser Archiv: Oben links die Büchersammlung, rechts ebenso mit einem Teil der Flugzeug- Typensammlung, unten die Buchstaben A - D der Typensammlung in den A4-Ordnern. Doch kann man sich auch als Fachfremder gut darin einarbeiten, wenn man "zur Stange" hält. Wir alle sind als ehrenamtliche Mitarbeiter im Museumsteam keine studierten Museums- pädagogen oder sonstige Fachwissenschaftler, sondern Menschen aus allen möglichen Berufen, Handwerker und Juristen, Verwaltungsleute und Mediziner. Uns eint die Liebe zur Fliegerei, deren Technik und der Wille zur historischen Einordnung. Und ordentlich mit solchen Themen umzugehen, haben wir in anderen Berufen gelernt. Im Archivgebäude haben wir mehrere Räume, in denen einmal so um 4 - 5 tausend Bücher, diverse Luftfahrtzeitschriften und andere Periodika versammelt sind. Dazu kommt eine ausgedehnte Flugzeugtypensammlung, die sich aus Veröffentlichungen einheimischer und auswärtiger Luftfahrtzeitschriften über die letzen 60 - 70 Jahre speist, mit Motor-, Segel- und UL-Flugzeugen sowie Hubschraubern. Das sind noch einmal gute 800 A-4 Bände, Die verschiedenen Typen sind nach Herstellern alphabetisch sortiert. Dieses Archiv dürfen Sie nach tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Induced Drag & Bending Moment
    On the Minimum Induced Drag of Wings -or- Thinking Outside the Box" Albion H. Bowers! NASA Dryden Flight Research Center! 04 Sep11! Introduction" " The History of Spanload# Development of the optimum spanload# Winglets and their implications! " Horten Sailplanes! " Flight Mechanics & Adverse yaw! " Concluding Remarks! Birds" Bird Flight as a Model! or “Why don#t birds have vertical tails?”" " Propulsion# Flapping motion to produce thrust# Wings also provide lift# Dynamic lift - birds use this all the time (easy for them, hard for us)! " Stability and Control# Still not understood in literature# Lack of vertical surfaces! " Birds as an Integrated System# Structure# Propulsion# Lift (performance)# Stability and control! " Wright dis-integrated the bird! " Its time to reintegrate bird-flight! Dynamic Lift Spanload Development" " Ludwig Prandtl# Development of the boundary layer concept (1903)# Developed the “lifting line” theory# Developed the concept of induced drag# Calculated the spanload for minimum induced drag (1908?)# Published in open literature (1920)# " Albert Betz# Published calculation of induced drag# Published optimum spanload for minimum induced drag (1914)# Credited all to Prandtl (circa 1908)! Spanload Development (continued)" " Max Munk# General solution to multiple airfoils# Referred to as the “stagger biplane theorem” (1920)# Munk worked for NACA Langley from 1920 through 1926# " Prandtl (again!)# “The Minimum Induced Drag of Wings” (1932)# Introduction of new constraint to spanload# Considers the bending moment as well
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Trajectories and Corporate Competences in Wind Energy
    Historical Trajectories and Corporate Competences in Wind Energy Geoffrey Jones Loubna Bouamane Working Paper 11-112 Copyright © 2011 by Geoffrey Jones and Loubna Bouamane Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Historical Trajectories and Corporate Competences in Wind Energy* Geoffrey Jones Loubna Bouamane Harvard Business School Harvard Business School May 2011 Abstract This working paper surveys the business history of the global wind energy turbine industry between the late nineteenth century and the present day. It examines the long- term prominence of firms headquartered in Denmark, the more fluctuating role of US- based firms, and the more recent growth of German, Spanish, Indian and Chinese firms. While natural resource endowment in wind has not been very significant in explaining the country of origin of leading firms, the existence of rural areas not supplied by grid electricity was an important motivation for early movers in both the US and Denmark. Public policy was the problem rather than the opportunity for wind entrepreneurs before 1980, but beginning with feed-in tariffs and other policy measures taken in California, policy mattered a great deal. However, Danish firms, building on inherited technological capabilities and benefitting from a small-scale and decentralized industrial structure, benefitted more from Californian public policies. The more recent growth of German, Spanish and Chinese firms reflected both home country subsidies for wind energy and strong local content policies, whilst successful firms pursued successful strategies to acquire technologies and develop their own capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Göttinger Monograph N: German Research and Development on Rotary-Wing Aircraft (1939-1945)
    Göttinger Monograph N: German Research and Development on Rotary-Wing Aircraft (1939-1945) Edited by Berend G. van der Wall, German Aerospace Center (DLR) Book Review by Walter G.O. Sonneborn fter the end of World War II, the Origin of the AVA Monograph N; Short maximum takeoff weight of 4,300 kg British Ministry of Supply — Biographies; Index; Supporting Materials (9,480 lb) and a Vh of 210 km/hr (113 kt), Ainterested in German aeronautical This 245 page book is a must for and achieved a ceiling height of 7,100 m technology developed during war rotorcraft history buffs as it gives a (23,000+ ft). — ordered the German aeronautical comprehensive view of the efforts of Configurations from pure autogyros, research establishments in Göttingen the German rotorcraft pioneers during single rotor helicopters (some with and Braunschweig to summarize their the years from 1939 through 1945. Their transition to autogyro flight for high research. The Göttingen Monographs work was contemporaneous with that of speed), intermeshing rotors, and side- About Advancements of the German Ludwig Prandtl (1875-1953), the founder by-side configurations were developed. Aeronautical Research Since 1939 of modern aerodynamics, working at the With today’s renewed interest in comprised several volumes. Volume University of Göttingen and founder of compound helicopters, the Flettner N, German Research and Development the famous AVA (Aerodynamic Research Fl-185 helicopter deserves special on Rotary-Wing Aircraft – written by Establishment). mentioning, as it used two propellers Gerhard Sissingh and O.H. Nagel and However, this book should also for both automatically adjusted torque edited by Albert Betz (as in the Betz be of great interest to any student reaction as well as auxiliary thrust.
    [Show full text]
  • Transonic Flow Around Swept Wings
    Transonic Flow Around Swept Wings: Revisiting Von Kármán’s Similarity Rule by Jeffrey J Kirkman A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2016 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Timothy Takahashi, Chair Valana Wells Marcus Herrmann ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2016 ABSTRACT Modern aircraft are expected to fly faster and more efficiently than their predecessors. To improve aerodynamic efficiency, designers must carefully consider and handle shock wave formation. Presently, many designers utilize computationally heavy optimization methods to design wings. While these methods may work, they do not provide insight. This thesis aims to better understand fundamental methods that govern wing design. In order to further understand the flow in the transonic regime, this work revisits the Transonic Similarity Rule. This rule postulates an equivalent incompressible geometry to any high speed geometry in flight and postulates a “stretching” analogy. This thesis utilizes panel methods and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to show that the “stretching” analogy is incorrect, but instead the flow is transformed by a nonlinear “scaling” of the flow velocity. This work also presents data to show the discrepancies between many famous authors in deriving the accurate Critical Pressure Coefficient (Cp*) equation for both swept and unswept wing sections. The final work of the thesis aims to identify the correct predictive methods for the Critical Pressure Coefficient. i TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Prandtl Took up the Chair of Applied Mechanics Göttinger Klassiker Der Strömungsmechanik Bd
    When Ludwig Prandtl took up the Chair of Applied Mechanics Göttinger Klassiker der Strömungsmechanik Bd. 9 at Göttingen University in 1904, the small university town be- herausgegeben von Andreas Dillmann came the cradle of modern fl uid mechanics and aerodynamics. Not only did Prandtl found two research institutions of world- wide renown, the Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt (AVA) and the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Strömungsforschung, but with the so-called ‘Göttingen School’ he also established an excep- Johanna Vogel-Prandtl tionally fertile line of scientifi c thinking, unique for its special balance of intuition for physics and mathematical precision. Ludwig Prandtl The scientifi c methods developed by Prandtl and his pupils are A Personal Biography Drawn from Memories manifested in numerous dissertations, monographs and text- books that now rate as classics and hence belong to the fun- and Correspondence damental works on fl uid mechanics. Yet many of these publi- cations have long been out of print and inaccessible for study. The series Göttinger Klassiker der Strömungsmechanik is thus making available selected publications that emerged from Lud- wig Prandtl’s ‘Göttingen School’ or stand in a particular histo- rical relationship to it. This highly personal biography of Ludwig Prandtl compiled by his daughter, Johanna Vogel-Prandtl, is complemented by nu- merous photographs depicting Prandtl’s working and private life. It completes the picture of the founding father of modern fl uid mechanics whose scientifi c importance continues to reso-
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Correlation Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Operating at High-Interference Flow Regimes
    energies Article A Novel Correlation Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines Operating at High-Interference Flow Regimes Anurag Rajan and Fernando L. Ponta * Department of Mechanical Engineering—Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: fl[email protected] Received: 13 December 2018; Accepted: 21 March 2019; Published: 25 March 2019 Abstract: Driven by economics-of-scale factors, wind-turbine rotor sizes have increased formidably in recent years. Larger rotors with lighter blades of increased flexibility will experiment substantially higher levels of deformation. Future turbines will also incorporate advanced control strategies to widen the range of wind velocities over which energy is captured. These factors will extend turbine operational regimes, including flow states with high interference factors. In this paper we derive a new empirical relation to both improve and extend the range of Blade Element Momentum (BEM) models, when applied to high interference-factor regimes. In most BEM models, these flow regimes are modeled using empirical relations derived from experimental data. However, an empirical relation that best represents these flow states is still missing. The new relation presented in this paper is based on data from numerical experiments performed on an actuator disk model, and implemented in the context of a novel model of the BEM family called the DRD-BEM (Dynamic Rotor Deformation—BEM), recently introduced in Ponta, et al., 2016. A detailed description of the numerical experiments is presented, followed by DRD-BEM simulation results for the case of the benchmark NREL-5MW Reference Wind Turbine with this new polynomial curve incorporated. Keywords: wind turbines; innovative interference model; blade aeroelastic modeling 1.
    [Show full text]