Eulamprus Tympanum)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eulamprus Tympanum) Ecology, 79(3), 1998, pp. 1073±1083 q 1998 by the Ecological Society of America REPRODUCTIVE ENERGY ALLOCATION AND LONG-TERM ENERGY STORES IN A VIVIPAROUS LIZARD (EULAMPRUS TYMPANUM) PAUL DOUGHTY1 AND RICHARD SHINE School of Biological Sciences, A08, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Abstract. When animals reproduce, does energy for the brood come from stored re- serves (from food eaten months or years before), or from food eaten during the current reproductive season? Variation in the duration of energy storage prior to reproduction is an important, but little-studied, axis of life history variation. We experimentally manipulated the availability of resources to females of a long-lived viviparous lizard (Eulamprus tym- panum, Scincidae) in the ®rst year of a two-year study to assess the relative importance of current food intake vs. stored reserves as sources of energy for breeding. Females given greater access to high temperatures (and hence, to resources) in the laboratory amassed larger caudal energy stores than did females with lesser opportunities. Energy intake during gestation slightly in¯uenced offspring size, but the magnitude of energy stores prior to ovulation had a more dramatic effect: females with larger caudal energy stores produced much larger litters in the following year. Growth rates of females were unaffected by basking treatments or by reproduction in either year, but females that reproduced in the second year showed a large concomitant decrease in caudal energy stores compared to females that did not reproduce, indicating a large energetic cost of reproduction. Hence, reproductive output within this species can be in¯uenced by resource availability over 12 months prior to reproduction, and simple comparisons of reproductive output with current resource avail- ability may fail to detect the ways in which phenotypically plastic life history traits are in¯uenced by environmental features. In addition to an appropriate temporal framework, models of resource allocation should also incorporate the possible roles of physiological and morphological constraints (e.g., maternal inability, in some species, to modify post- ovulation reproductive expenditure) and trade-offs with other life history currencies (e.g., decrements in maternal survival due to high relative clutch masses). The time lag between resource acquisition and expenditure may have signi®cant consequences for a population's demographic response to shifts in resource availability or predation pressure (via tail au- totomy). Finally, this study illustrates the way in which thermal aspects of the environment can in¯uence life history phenotypes in ectothermic vertebrates with long-term energy stores. Key words: energy allocation; Eulamprus tympanum; life history; lizard; reproduction; Scincidae; storage; time lags; trade-offs. INTRODUCTION ered a considerable time prior to their expenditure, be- cause of the scarcity or ephemeral nature of the re- The relative allocation of an organism's available source in question (e.g., Hahn and Tinkle 1965, Fraser resources among the competing demands of mainte- 1980, Reznick and Yang 1993, Chastel et al. 1995). nance, growth, and reproduction has been a central Thus, the magnitude and duration of the storage of theme of research into life history ``strategies'' ever resources, and their patterns of subsequent use, rep- since R. A. Fisher ®rst raised the question in 1930. resent important, but little-explored, axes of interspe- Although most work in this ®eld has focused on energy ci®c and intraspeci®c variation. acquisition and expenditure, there is a growing rec- From a life history perspective, reliance on energy ognition that one important component of Fisher's orig- storage ultimately concerns the bene®ts and costs of inal formulation has been largely neglected. This is the different schedules of energy acquisition and expen- issue of energy storage (e.g., Reznick and Braun 1987, diture (e.g., Fisher 1930, Hahn and Tinkle 1965, Rez- Hom 1988, Dunham et al. 1989, Perrin and Sibly 1993, nick and Braun 1987, Dunham et al. 1989, Perrin and Bernardo 1994, Rollo 1995, JoÈnsson 1997). There are Sibly 1993, Reznick and Yang 1993, Chastel et al. many circumstances in which resources must be gath- 1995). Energy storage can be advantageous because it enables an organism to decouple the acquisition of en- Manuscript received 2 August 1996; revised 23 April 1997; ergy from its expenditure on functions such as growth accepted 28 April 1997. 1 Present address: Department of Zoology, University of or reproduction. For example, if resources are plentiful Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Aus- early in the year and conditions are favorable for off- tralia. spring survival later in the year, then energy storage 1073 1074 PAUL DOUGHTY AND RICHARD SHINE Ecology, Vol. 79, No. 3 can allow an organism to ``save'' and ``spend'' energy the role of energy storage in reproduction. These me- (in economic terms) at different times, such that pa- dium-sized (;85 mm snout±vent length, 10 g body rental ®tness is maximized. Additionally, if the re- mass) diurnal scincid lizards are long-lived (.12 years sources necessary for a reproductive bout must be gath- in the wild, based on skeletochronology data; Tilley ered over a long period of time, then storage can pro- 1984; see also Blomberg 1994), and each year a large vide a means by which energy can be amassed and proportion of adult females does not reproduce spent in a single, large brood. This strategy, whereby (Schwarzkopf 1991, 1993, Rohr 1997). Eulamprus are reproduction is delayed (i.e., opportunities for repro- viviparous, but placental transfer of nutrients is be- duction are skipped) until the female has suf®cient en- lieved to be minimal; reproductive energy is allocated ergy to ®ll up her body cavity with embryos, may en- mostly at ovulation (Thompson 1981). Because the off- hance maternal ®tness if reproduction imposes high spring are nutritionally independent from birth, a fe- ``costs'' (in energy or risk) that are independent of the male's total energetic investment in her brood is con- level of fecundity (Bull and Shine 1979). In some cases, tained within the litter at parturition. the duration of energy storage may be very long. Less- The phylogenetic lineage of skinks that includes E. than-annual reproductive frequencies are common in tympanum is unusual in lacking abdominal fat bodies, long-lived species of lizards (e.g., Van Wyk 1991, so that the primary energy store is the base of the tail Schwarzkopf 1993, Cree and Guillette 1995), snakes (Greer 1986, 1989, Doughty 1996a, Doughty and Shine (e.g., Saint-Girons 1982, Seigel and Fitch 1985, Shine 1997, Rohr 1997; see also Taylor 1986, Xiang et al. 1986, Naulleau and Bonnet 1996), turtles (e.g., Gib- 1994). In the current study, we chose to focus on caudal bons and Semlitsch 1982, Limpus et al. 1984), and energy stores because of the wide variation in tail thick- salamanders (e.g., Maiorana 1977, Fraser 1980, Scott ness of adult females observed in the wild (from 6.5 and Fore 1995). mm to 11.0 mm; P. Doughty, unpublished data), and Ectothermic vertebrates thus provide some of the because of the negative correlation between reproduc- best examples of reproduction that is fuelled by energy tion and caudal energy stores in a closely-related spe- gathered over a long period prior to the time of ovu- cies that also lacks abdominal fat bodies (Taylor 1986; lation, rather than energy gathered during gestation see also Castilla and Bauwens 1990). Without invasive (e.g., Fraser 1980, Reznick 1983, Schultz et al. 1991, or lethal procedures, we assessed energy stores by mea- Naulleau and Bonnet 1996). However, work on small, suring the width of the tailbase, which is correlated short-lived species has provided both correlational with the amount of lipids stored in the tail (Doughty (e.g., Derickson 1976a, Ballinger 1977, Jones et al. 1996a). 1987, Smith et al. 1995) and experimental (Guyer 1988, The montane environment occupied by E. tympanum Ford and Seigel 1989, Reznick and Yang 1993, James has a cool and variable climate, which strongly affects and Whitford 1994, Jokela and Mutikainen 1995) ev- the animals' opportunities to maintain high body tem- idence that prey availability can in¯uence reproductive peratures. Such environmental constraints have strong output within a single season. It appears that repro- effects on these lizards' rates of feeding, digestion, and, ductive output in such taxa can be modi®ed relatively for gravid females, rates of embryogenesis that deter- quickly in response to changes in energy availability. mine the duration of pregnancy (Schwarzkopf and Nonetheless, studies of short-lived species are poorly Shine 1991, 1992, Blomberg 1994, Doughty 1996a). suited to analyses of longer term effects of energy stor- Thus, by modifying basking opportunities in the lab- age on reproductive output. If we are to develop general oratory, we were able to manipulate females' rates of models of energy allocation in ectotherms, and es- feeding and energy assimilation. This population of E. pecially if we are to determine whether patterns of tympanum has been under study since 1987, and much energy allocation differ fundamentally between long- is known of its demography, behavior, and reproduction and short-lived species (Sauer and Slade 1987, Wei- (Schwarzkopf 1991, 1992, 1993, Schwarzkopf and merskirch 1992, Perrin and Sibly 1993, Schwarzkopf Shine 1991, 1992, Blomberg 1994, Doughty 1996a, 1993), then data on long-lived species (including or- Doughty and Shine 1997; see also Rohr 1997). ganisms that frequently skip opportunities for repro- duction) are essential. In this paper, we describe an Experimental design experimental study on such an organism, to explore the In the ®rst year of the study, we manipulated basking role of energy storage in ectotherm reproduction, and opportunities of female water skinks during gestation speci®cally the degree to which reproduction is fuelled (that is, after litter size had been determined) to ex- by recently ingested energy vs.
Recommended publications
  • Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles
    Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles Geoff Robertson 4 June 2017 Turtle (1-2 species) Lizard Gecko (2) Legless lizard (4-5) Dragon (6) Gonna (2) Skink (32-35) Egernia group - chunky (9) Eugongylus group - striped (9-10) Sphenomorphus group - red (14) Snakes Blind (1) Total species = 57-66 Python (1?) Elapid (9-12) Murray (short-neck) turtle (above left) Emydura macquarii Eastern long-neck turtle (above right) Chelodina longicollis Lizards Monitors (goannas) Dragons Skinks Geckos Measuring length lizards & snakes: Legless TL - total length. lizards SVL - tip of the nose (snout) to vent. Dragons Physignathus lesueurii, Australia: 11 genera, 70 species. SVL 245 mm ACT/Yass: 5 genera, 6 species Common: Pogona barbata, Water dragon (top), Aust: 1 SVL 250 mm species. Eastern bearded dragon (bottom), Aust: 6 species. Jacky lizard or tree dragon. Three similar dragons Jacky (top), Nobbi (middle) and Mountain (bottom). SVL is Jacky - 120mm Nobbi - 84mm Mountain - 82mm However, all dragons (including water & bearded ) look similar when young. Photos top to bottom - Amphibolurus mutinous and A. nobbi, & Rankina diemensis. by Warren Saunders, John Wombey and Roger Farrow. Grassland earless dragon Eight earless dragon species in Australia. GED found in some natural grassland sites, climbs tussock grasses otherwise a ground dweller. Unlike other dragons, Tail slight/curls. Populations - ACT & southern Monaro. GED thought extinct, re-discovered, crashed in drought, captive breeding, future? Tympanocryptis pinguicolla. SVL 55mm. Bottom photo: Margaret Ning. Jacky dragon Bearded dragon Water dragon Nobbi dragon Mountain dragon Grassland earless dragon Gecko Australia: 18 genera & 111 species ACT/Yass: 2 species Stone gecko (right) Marble gecko (below) Diplodactylus vittatus, SVL 50mm Photo John Wombey Christinus marmaratus, SVL 70mm Photo Margaret Ning Legless lizards Related to geckos Australia: 7 genera & 38 species ACT/Yass: 2 genera & 5 species Unlike snakes: Lialis burtonis, SVL170mm Photo John Wombey • Large fleshy tongue (cf forked).
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Significant Flora and Fauna Surveys, Officer, Victoria
    FINAL REPORT: Officer Precinct Structure Plan: Targeted Significant Flora and Fauna Surveys, Officer, Victoria PREPARED FOR: Cardinia Shire Council on behalf of the Growth Areas Authority April 2009 Ecology Partners Pty Ltd HEAD OFFICE: 420 Victoria Street, Brunswick VIC 3056 MELBOURNE: PO Box 298, Brunswick VIC 3056 GEELONG: PO Box 8048 Newtown VIC 3220 Table of Contents Summary.............................................................................................................5 1 Introduction .............................................................................................9 1.1 Background...............................................................................................9 1.2 Flora Species of Conservation Significance .............................................9 1.2.1 Matted Flax-lily Dianella amoena .............................................................................. 9 1.2.2 Green Scentbark Eucalyptus fulgens ..................................................................... 11 1.2.3 Swamp Everlasting Xerochrysum palustre............................................................ 12 1.2.4 River Swamp Wallaby-grass Amphibromus fluitans............................................. 12 1.2.5 Veined Spear-grass Austrostipa rudis subsp. australis ...................................... 13 1.2.6 Arching Flax-lily Dianella sp. aff. longifolia (Benambra)....................................... 14 1.2.7 Maroon Leek Orchid Prasophyllum frenchii .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Do Operational Sex Ratios Influence Sex Allocation in Viviparous Lizards
    doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01086.x Do operational sex ratios influence sex allocation in viviparous lizards with temperature-dependent sex determination? D. J. ALLSOP, D. A. WARNER, T. LANGKILDE,1 W. DU2 & R. SHINE School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Keywords: Abstract litter sex ratio; Under certain environmental situations, selection may favour the ability of maternal effects; females to adjust the sex ratio of their offspring. Two recent studies have sex allocation; suggested that viviparous scincid lizards can modify the sex ratio of the sex-biased investment; offspring they produce in response to the operational sex ratio (OSR). Both of temperature-dependent sex determination. the species in question belong to genera that have also recently been shown to exhibit temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD). Here we test whether pregnant montane water skinks (Eulamprus tympanum) utilise TSD to select offspring sex in response to population wide imbalances in the OSR, by means of active thermoregulation. We use a combination of laboratory and field-based experiments, and conduct the first field-based test of this hypothesis by maintaining females in outdoor enclosures of varying OSR treatments throughout pregnancy. Although maternal body temperature during pregnancy was influenced by OSR, the variation in temperature was not great enough to affect litter sex ratios or any other phenotypic traits of the offspring. where the environment might have sex specific fitness Introduction effects on the offspring, and ask whether mothers In most sexually reproducing species, females are expec- facultatively adjust their offspring sex ratios in response ted to allocate equal effort to producing sons and to imbalances in the population adult sex ratio (termed daughters, assuming that the fitness returns from the the Operational Sex Ratio (OSR)).
    [Show full text]
  • Corangamite Water Skink Eulamprus Tympanum Marnieae
    Action Statement Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 142 Corangamite Water Skink Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Description and Distribution The Corangamite Water Skink, Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Hutchinson and Rawlinson 1995, is a medium-sized lizard of the family Scincidae. Adults may reach 100 mm snout-vent length, with a tail length of up to 145 mm - they show little sexual dimorphism, and have a body mass up to 20 grams. The Corangamite Water Skink is light to very dark brown on the dorsal surface of the head, body, tail and limbs, overlain by black markings. The general colour is suffused with yellow - often the underside of the belly, limbs and tail is bright yellow (Hutchinson & Rawlinson 1995). The main morphological differences separating the Corangamite Water Corangamite Water Skink Skink from the closely related Southern Water Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Skink (E. t. tympanum) are the higher numbers of (Photo: Peter Robertson) mid-body and para-vertebral scales, and the distinctive colour patterns. The Corangamite Water Skink was discovered in 1963 near Lismore, Victoria, and was described in 1995. It has since been found at 29 sites, probably representing at least ten discrete populations. It is restricted to the basalt plains of south-western Victoria, and has been recorded as a number of isolated populations between Colac in the south- east and lake Bolac in the north-west. More areas of seemingly potential habitat further west have been examined recently, with no Corangamite Water Skinks found there. Habitat The Corangamite Water Skink is restricted to Victoria. The subspecies is the only water skink Distribution in Victoria occurring within the naturally treeless grasslands [source: Atlas of Victorian Wildlife, DSE of south-eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Repeated Low-Intensity Fire on Reptile Populations of a Mixed Eucalypt Foothill Forest in South-Eastern Australia
    EcologicalThe effects of repeated Victorian low-intensity fire on reptile populations of a mixed eucalypt foothill forest in south-eastern Australia Research report no. 65 Effects of repeated low-intensity fire on reptile populations of a mixed eucalypt foothill forest in south-eastern Australia Research Report No. 65 Marc Irvin, Martin Westbrooke and Mathew Gibson Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat December 2003 This report was commissioned by Fire Management Department of Sustainability and Environment Victoria ii For further information contact: DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN 1 74106 895 9 Department of Sustainability and Environment, PO Box 500, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002. www.dse.vic.gov.au/fires This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind, or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes, and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Cover photographs 1. Spot fire ignition point, DSE/K.Tolhurst 2. Garden Skink, DSE/I.McCann The full series of Fire Research Reports can be found on: www.dse.vic.gov.au/fires (fire management; fire research) iii Foreword The vegetation, topography and climate of south-eastern Australia combine to make the region one of the most wildfire-prone areas on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Eulamprus Heatwolei ) Use Both Visual and Chemical Cues to Detect Female Sexual Receptivity
    Acta Ethol (2005) 8: 79–85 DOI 10.1007/s10211-005-0003-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Megan L. Head . J. Scott Keogh . Paul Doughty Male southern water skinks (Eulamprus heatwolei ) use both visual and chemical cues to detect female sexual receptivity Received: 14 December 2004 / Revised: 12 June 2005 / Accepted: 4 July 2005 / Published online: 2 August 2005 # Springer-Verlag and ISPA 2005 Abstract A wide range of organisms use chemical and favoured over small non-receptive females over the odour- visual cues in mate attraction and courtship; however, less control. We speculate that males use vision to find chemical discrimination relevant to reproduction and the females and then use their chemosensory ability to chem- interplay between these two types of communication are ically evaluate female sexual receptivity once the pair are in poorly understood in reptiles. We experimentally tested the close proximity. ability of male Eulamprus heatwolei, a scincoid lizard, to discriminate between sexually receptive and non-receptive Keywords Behavioural ecology . Mating system . females in two ways. First, we conducted 155 staged Chemical ecology . Courtship encounters between males and females over 29 days to determine the start and the duration of the female receptive period based on the date of copulations. These data suggest Introduction that the receptive period lasted for approximately 7 days in late October under controlled laboratory conditions. We Detecting the reproductive status of potential sexual part- also recorded 6,330 individual male and female behaviours ners is a crucial component of sexual behaviour in most during these trials to evaluate the frequency of female animals (Johnston 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
    State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to
    [Show full text]
  • 'At Risk' Species Near Wetlands and Keas Along the River Murray in SA
    Richness of ‘At Risk’ Species near Wetlands and KEAs along the River Murray in SA FINAL February 2011 Richness of 'At Risk' Species near Wetlands and KEAs This series of maps displays the number (or richness) of ‘at-risk’ species in proximity to wetlands and within Key Environmental Assets (KEAs) described in the Assessing vulnerability of fauna_climate change_SA River Murray_Final_June11.pdf report. Spatial data and research literature can be found in the Floodplain Information Package (FIP) 2012. Limitations from that report have been reproduced below: The methodology and data used in this project is detailed in the report AssessingFaunaCC_GISMethodsFeb2011.pdf. Conclusions, Limitations and Future Work Thirty-seven vertebrate fauna species (eleven fish, two frogs, nine reptiles, eleven birds and four mammals) were identified through the risk assessment process as most ‘at- risk‘ or most vulnerable under climate change in the South Australian Murray Darling Basin (from Wellington to SA-Vic Border). These are listed in Table below. Although many aspects of each species’ ecology, physiology, genetics and resilience influenced the assessments, the vulnerability of all species was driven principally by two main factors. Firstly, the forecast decrease in flood frequency, duration and extent along the River Murray resulting in a significant reduction in area and quality of foraging and breeding habitat (in particular floodplain and flowing habitat). Secondly, an increase in overall salinity levels coupled with a decrease in wetland, floodplain and river productivity and subsequent decline in diversity and abundance of flora and fauna that make up the food resources and habitat structure for all ‘at- risk‘ vertebrate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Coastal Ecosystems of East Gippsland Regional Bushfire Recovery Workshop Report
    Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report Summary of outcomes from the regional co-design workshop 1 September 2020 Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence except content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Inquiries about the licence and any use of this document should be emailed to [email protected]. Cataloguing data This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment 2020, Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, November. CC BY 4.0. ISBN 978-1-76003-351-4 This publication is available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/bushfire-recovery/regional-delivery- program Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 900 090 Web awe.gov.au The Australian Government acting through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence and for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying on any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered Or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14
    McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 L. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 July 2015 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture ii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture L. J. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 July 2015 iii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 This publication may be cited as: McLeay, L. J., Tsolos, A. and Boyle, M. K. (2015). Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries. Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5. SARDI Research Report Series No. 851. 78pp. Cover Photos: Australian Sea Lions and Long-nosed Fur Seal pup (courtesy of Crystal Beckmann). Little Penguin (courtesy of B. Page). Leafy Seadragon (courtesy of S. Sorokin). Great White Shark (courtesy of R. Saunders). South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/ DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC OFFICER:- R Longmore (1983-2007).; Scott Keogh (2008-)
    THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 43 History of Office Bearers Formation Committee (April 1964):- MJ Littlejohn (Convenor); State Reps IR Straughan (Qld), FJ Mitchell (SA), HG Cogger (NSW), G Storr (WA), RE Barwick (ACT), JW Warren (Vic), AK Lee (Editor). First AGM (23 August 1965):- President MJ Littlejohn, Vice-President NG Stephenson, Secretary-Treasurer AA Martin, Asst Secretary-Treasurer KJ Wilson, Ordinary Members FJ Mitchell and IR Straughan, Editor AK Lee. PRESIDENT:- MJ Littlejohn (1965-69); AK Lee (1969-70); HG Cogger (1971-73); J de Bavay (1974); H Heat- wole (1975-76); GC Grigg (1976-77); MJ Tyler (1978-79); GF Watson (1979-81); AA Martin (1981-82); RS Seymour (1982-83); R Shine (1983-84); GC Grigg (1984-86); J Coventry (1986-87); RE Barwick (1987-88); J Covacevich (1988-91); M Davies (1991-92); R Shine (1992-94); A Georges (1994-6); D. Roberts (1996-98); M Bull (1998-9); R Swain (1999-2001); Sharon Downes (2001-03); J Melville (2004-2005); Dr Jean-Marc Hero (2005-2007); P Doherty (2007-2008); M Thompson (2008-) VICE-PRESIDENT:- NG Stephenson (1965-67); RE Barwick (1967-69); HG Cogger (1969-70); MJ Littlejohn (1971-72); MJ Tyler (1973); HG Cogger (1974); J de Bavay (1975-76); H Heatwole (1976-77); GC Grigg (1977-79); MJ Tyler (1979-80); GF Watson (1981-82); AA Martin (1982-83); RS Seymour (1983-84); R Shine (1984-86); GC Grigg (1986-87); J Coventry (1987-88); RE Barwick (1988-91); J Covacevich (1991-92); M Davies (1992-94); R. Shine (1994-6); A Georges (1996-98); D Roberts (1998-99); M Bull(1999-2001); R Swain (2001-2003); S Downes (2004-5); J Melville (2005-2007); J-M Hero (2007-2008); P Doherty (2008-) SECRETARY/TREASURER:- AA Martin (1965-67); GF Watson (1967-72); LA Moffatt (1973-75); J Caughley (1975-76); RWG Jenkins (1976-77); M Davies (1978-83); G Courtice (1983-87); J Wombey (1987-99); S Ke- ogh (1999-2003); N Mitchell (2004-5).
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 10, 2008 W. Linn Montgomery1 and Yael Bernstein1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640 2 SWCA Environmental Consultants, 114 N. San Francisco St. #100, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society Bernstein, Y. and W.L. Montgomery. (2008, October 10) Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss; Walbaum, 1792): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rainbowtrout.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Richard Vacirca, Gary Patton, and David Winters of the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region for the opportunity to prepare this assessment and for their assistance at many points in its preparation and finalization. Thanks are also due an anonymous reviewer for many helpful comments. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES W. Linn Montgomery received B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees from the UC Berkeley, UCLA, and Arizona State University, respectively. As a postdoctoral researcher with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, he studied the ecology of Atlantic salmon and sea-run brook trout in eastern Quebec before joining the faculty at Northern Arizona University. From 1984 to 1987, he served on, and in 1986 chaired, the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. He also served as Commission representative to the Arizona Water Quality Control Council and various committees of the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. His students have studied rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon, tilapia, native and exotic cyprinids, marine surgeonfishes, damselfishes and scorpionfishes, rattlesnakes, ephemeral pond crustaceans, crayfish, river ecology, and fish paleontology.
    [Show full text]