Do Operational Sex Ratios Influence Sex Allocation in Viviparous Lizards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Do Operational Sex Ratios Influence Sex Allocation in Viviparous Lizards doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01086.x Do operational sex ratios influence sex allocation in viviparous lizards with temperature-dependent sex determination? D. J. ALLSOP, D. A. WARNER, T. LANGKILDE,1 W. DU2 & R. SHINE School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Keywords: Abstract litter sex ratio; Under certain environmental situations, selection may favour the ability of maternal effects; females to adjust the sex ratio of their offspring. Two recent studies have sex allocation; suggested that viviparous scincid lizards can modify the sex ratio of the sex-biased investment; offspring they produce in response to the operational sex ratio (OSR). Both of temperature-dependent sex determination. the species in question belong to genera that have also recently been shown to exhibit temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD). Here we test whether pregnant montane water skinks (Eulamprus tympanum) utilise TSD to select offspring sex in response to population wide imbalances in the OSR, by means of active thermoregulation. We use a combination of laboratory and field-based experiments, and conduct the first field-based test of this hypothesis by maintaining females in outdoor enclosures of varying OSR treatments throughout pregnancy. Although maternal body temperature during pregnancy was influenced by OSR, the variation in temperature was not great enough to affect litter sex ratios or any other phenotypic traits of the offspring. where the environment might have sex specific fitness Introduction effects on the offspring, and ask whether mothers In most sexually reproducing species, females are expec- facultatively adjust their offspring sex ratios in response ted to allocate equal effort to producing sons and to imbalances in the population adult sex ratio (termed daughters, assuming that the fitness returns from the the Operational Sex Ratio (OSR)). sexes are equal (Fisher, 1930). However, sex specific The OSR is defined as the ratio of males to females that fitness returns may differ under a wide variety of are ready to mate in a population at any one time (Emlen circumstances (Bull, 1981; Bull & Charnov, 1988). For & Oring, 1977), and this ratio can have a large impact on example, when relatives interact with each other in the level of mating competition, and thus sexual competition for mates or resources, and these inter- selection (Kvarnemo & Ahnesjo, 1996,2002). A bias in actions differ between the sexes, fitness returns may be the OSR will usually result in increased competition for sex specific (Hamilton, 1967). In circumstances where mates or resources amongst individuals of the more fitness returns differ between sons and daughters, abundant sex, and the extent of the OSR bias will selection may favour maternal ability to shift sex determine the level of competition and the intensity of allocation to produce the ‘best’ sex for the prevailing sexual selection (Clutton-Brock & Parker, 1992). For social and ecological conditions (Hamilton, 1967; Trivers example, males of the common spider mite (Tetranychus & Willard, 1973; Charnov, 1982; Frank, 1990; West et al., urticae) increase their level of mating competition as the 2002; West & Sheldon, 2002). Here we investigate a case OSR shifts towards a male bias, and consequently sexual selection leads to an increase in male body size relative to Correspondence: David J. Allsop, School of Biological Sciences, The female size (Enders, 1993). In a sex-role-reversed shore- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. bird (Wilson’s phalarope, Phalatropus tricolor), the inten- Tel.: 61 02 9351 4661; fax: 61 02 9351 5609; sity of female–female competition diminishes as more e-mail: [email protected] males arrive at breeding grounds, levelling out the OSR 1Present address: T. Langkilde, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA (Colwell & Oring, 1988). 2Present address: W. Du, School of Life Sciences, Hangzhou Normal Sex allocation theory predicts that if the OSR is College, Hangzhou, 310012, China perturbed from unity (either in time or space), facultative ª 2006 THE AUTHORS 19 (2006) 1175–1182 JOURNAL COMPILATION ª 2006 EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 1175 1176 D. J. ALLSOP ET AL. sex ratio adjustment should cause females to over- context. To do so we combine the realism of field produce the rare sex. In this way, mothers can reduce conditions with the power of experimentation, by competition within the over-abundant sex, and thus allowing females to gestate in field enclosures in which maximise offspring fitness (Werren & Charnov, 1978; we have manipulated OSR. We further extend previous Werren & Taylor, 1984; West & Godfray, 1997). For such work by asking whether the two environmentally labile an effect to occur, there must be considerable overlap in sex allocation strategies (OSR and TSD) are linked in this generations, such that offspring have the opportunity to species, by measuring the thermal behaviour of pregnant compete with their mothers’ adult conspecifics. In addi- females throughout gestation in the laboratory whilst tion, mothers must have the ability to accurately perceive housed in varying OSR treatments. Our prediction is that the OSR and to make the relevant sex ratio adjustments pregnant females utilise TSD to alter their sex allocation (Werren & Charnov, 1978). Empirical evidence that OSR decisions in response to an unbalanced OSR, via active can influence sex ratio has come from disparate maternal thermoregulation during gestation. phylogenetic lineages, including plants (Lopez & Dominguez, 2003), insects (McLain & Marsh, 1990), Materials and methods and humans (Lummaa et al., 1998; Lazarus, 2002). Two recent studies on viviparous scincid lizards in The model system Australia have suggested the same ability in reptiles. The first of these studies, using free ranging populations of The southern water-skink, E. tympanum is a medium the Tasmanian snow skink, Niveoscincus microlepidotus, sized (mean adult snout-vent length (SVL) 82 mm) used correlational evidence to suggest that females insectivorous scincid lizard with a geographic range perceive the OSR through the number of potential mates stretching throughout much of montane SE Australia they encounter during the breeding season. They then (Cogger, 2000). Eulamprus tympanum is viviparous and is shift their litter sex ratios to track the OSR both among predominantly lecithotrophic, providing nutrients for the and within years (Olsson & Shine, 2001). The second developing embryos in a yolk sac (Thompson et al., example used the southern water skink, Eulamprus 2001a). Ovulation and mating occur in October, and the tympanum, and conducted laboratory experiments with females gestate their young over summer, giving birth to animals held in small sex-biased populations (Robert between one and five offspring in January/February et al., 2003). Robert et al. (2003) concluded that pregnant (Schwarzkopf & Shine, 1991). females use facultative sex allocation in response to OSR, by overproducing the sex that is in short supply. Laboratory experiment However, the mechanism by which female E. tympanum perceives the OSR remains elusive (Robert, 2003). Adult male and female E. tympanum were collected early Intriguingly, although the taxa involved belong to two in the breeding season (early October, 2004) from widely separated phylogenetic lineages, both belong to Kanangra-Boyd National Park (33 °58.270S, genera that have been reported to shift offspring sex 150 °03.346E), 160 km west of Sydney, New South ratios in response to thermal conditions during gestation Wales, in eastern Australia. Lizards were measured (temperature-dependant sex determination (TSD): Rob- (mass, SVL, tail length), sexed (by hemipene eversion: ert & Thompson, 2001; Wapstra et al., 2004). Harlow, 1996), and given a unique toe clip for individual The mechanism of sex determination in these vivipar- identification. Lizards were then kept in experimental ous lizards is poorly understood and remains controver- groups in animal housing facilities at the University of sial (Valenzuela et al., 2003). In the southern water Sydney. skink, E. tympanum, offspring sex ratio is sensitive to Animals were kept in plastic nally bins (645 · maternal temperature during gestation, suggesting a 413 · 276 mm) and provided with basking heat using possible role for TSD (Robert & Thompson, 2001). under-cage heating tape set to 40°C (average field Temperature-dependant sex determination is commonly basking temperature in field is 30°C (Schwarzkopf & associated with a lack of heteromorphic sex chromo- Shine, 1991). Thus, lizards in these enclosures were able somes (Bull, 1980), and karyotype analysis demonstrates to regulate their own temperatures behaviourally that the Eulamprus genus indeed shows no overt sex whenever the heating tape was switched on, from chromosome dimorphism (Donnellan, 1985). However approximately 16°C (air temperature) to 40°C (the the co-occurrence of TSD and genetic sex determination hottest point above the heat tape). Heat strips were (GSD) in sister taxa and even within a single species controlled with an electronic timer set to one of two (Wibbels et al., 1994; Shine et al., 2002) suggest that the contrasting basking length regimes in an attempt to boundary between TSD and GSD is blurred, and that the mimic thermal variation in the field. Half of the animals two mechanisms comprise points on a continuum rather were offered a limited
Recommended publications
  • Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles
    Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles Geoff Robertson 4 June 2017 Turtle (1-2 species) Lizard Gecko (2) Legless lizard (4-5) Dragon (6) Gonna (2) Skink (32-35) Egernia group - chunky (9) Eugongylus group - striped (9-10) Sphenomorphus group - red (14) Snakes Blind (1) Total species = 57-66 Python (1?) Elapid (9-12) Murray (short-neck) turtle (above left) Emydura macquarii Eastern long-neck turtle (above right) Chelodina longicollis Lizards Monitors (goannas) Dragons Skinks Geckos Measuring length lizards & snakes: Legless TL - total length. lizards SVL - tip of the nose (snout) to vent. Dragons Physignathus lesueurii, Australia: 11 genera, 70 species. SVL 245 mm ACT/Yass: 5 genera, 6 species Common: Pogona barbata, Water dragon (top), Aust: 1 SVL 250 mm species. Eastern bearded dragon (bottom), Aust: 6 species. Jacky lizard or tree dragon. Three similar dragons Jacky (top), Nobbi (middle) and Mountain (bottom). SVL is Jacky - 120mm Nobbi - 84mm Mountain - 82mm However, all dragons (including water & bearded ) look similar when young. Photos top to bottom - Amphibolurus mutinous and A. nobbi, & Rankina diemensis. by Warren Saunders, John Wombey and Roger Farrow. Grassland earless dragon Eight earless dragon species in Australia. GED found in some natural grassland sites, climbs tussock grasses otherwise a ground dweller. Unlike other dragons, Tail slight/curls. Populations - ACT & southern Monaro. GED thought extinct, re-discovered, crashed in drought, captive breeding, future? Tympanocryptis pinguicolla. SVL 55mm. Bottom photo: Margaret Ning. Jacky dragon Bearded dragon Water dragon Nobbi dragon Mountain dragon Grassland earless dragon Gecko Australia: 18 genera & 111 species ACT/Yass: 2 species Stone gecko (right) Marble gecko (below) Diplodactylus vittatus, SVL 50mm Photo John Wombey Christinus marmaratus, SVL 70mm Photo Margaret Ning Legless lizards Related to geckos Australia: 7 genera & 38 species ACT/Yass: 2 genera & 5 species Unlike snakes: Lialis burtonis, SVL170mm Photo John Wombey • Large fleshy tongue (cf forked).
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Significant Flora and Fauna Surveys, Officer, Victoria
    FINAL REPORT: Officer Precinct Structure Plan: Targeted Significant Flora and Fauna Surveys, Officer, Victoria PREPARED FOR: Cardinia Shire Council on behalf of the Growth Areas Authority April 2009 Ecology Partners Pty Ltd HEAD OFFICE: 420 Victoria Street, Brunswick VIC 3056 MELBOURNE: PO Box 298, Brunswick VIC 3056 GEELONG: PO Box 8048 Newtown VIC 3220 Table of Contents Summary.............................................................................................................5 1 Introduction .............................................................................................9 1.1 Background...............................................................................................9 1.2 Flora Species of Conservation Significance .............................................9 1.2.1 Matted Flax-lily Dianella amoena .............................................................................. 9 1.2.2 Green Scentbark Eucalyptus fulgens ..................................................................... 11 1.2.3 Swamp Everlasting Xerochrysum palustre............................................................ 12 1.2.4 River Swamp Wallaby-grass Amphibromus fluitans............................................. 12 1.2.5 Veined Spear-grass Austrostipa rudis subsp. australis ...................................... 13 1.2.6 Arching Flax-lily Dianella sp. aff. longifolia (Benambra)....................................... 14 1.2.7 Maroon Leek Orchid Prasophyllum frenchii .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corangamite Water Skink Eulamprus Tympanum Marnieae
    Action Statement Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 142 Corangamite Water Skink Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Description and Distribution The Corangamite Water Skink, Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Hutchinson and Rawlinson 1995, is a medium-sized lizard of the family Scincidae. Adults may reach 100 mm snout-vent length, with a tail length of up to 145 mm - they show little sexual dimorphism, and have a body mass up to 20 grams. The Corangamite Water Skink is light to very dark brown on the dorsal surface of the head, body, tail and limbs, overlain by black markings. The general colour is suffused with yellow - often the underside of the belly, limbs and tail is bright yellow (Hutchinson & Rawlinson 1995). The main morphological differences separating the Corangamite Water Corangamite Water Skink Skink from the closely related Southern Water Eulamprus tympanum marnieae Skink (E. t. tympanum) are the higher numbers of (Photo: Peter Robertson) mid-body and para-vertebral scales, and the distinctive colour patterns. The Corangamite Water Skink was discovered in 1963 near Lismore, Victoria, and was described in 1995. It has since been found at 29 sites, probably representing at least ten discrete populations. It is restricted to the basalt plains of south-western Victoria, and has been recorded as a number of isolated populations between Colac in the south- east and lake Bolac in the north-west. More areas of seemingly potential habitat further west have been examined recently, with no Corangamite Water Skinks found there. Habitat The Corangamite Water Skink is restricted to Victoria. The subspecies is the only water skink Distribution in Victoria occurring within the naturally treeless grasslands [source: Atlas of Victorian Wildlife, DSE of south-eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Repeated Low-Intensity Fire on Reptile Populations of a Mixed Eucalypt Foothill Forest in South-Eastern Australia
    EcologicalThe effects of repeated Victorian low-intensity fire on reptile populations of a mixed eucalypt foothill forest in south-eastern Australia Research report no. 65 Effects of repeated low-intensity fire on reptile populations of a mixed eucalypt foothill forest in south-eastern Australia Research Report No. 65 Marc Irvin, Martin Westbrooke and Mathew Gibson Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat December 2003 This report was commissioned by Fire Management Department of Sustainability and Environment Victoria ii For further information contact: DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN 1 74106 895 9 Department of Sustainability and Environment, PO Box 500, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002. www.dse.vic.gov.au/fires This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind, or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes, and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Cover photographs 1. Spot fire ignition point, DSE/K.Tolhurst 2. Garden Skink, DSE/I.McCann The full series of Fire Research Reports can be found on: www.dse.vic.gov.au/fires (fire management; fire research) iii Foreword The vegetation, topography and climate of south-eastern Australia combine to make the region one of the most wildfire-prone areas on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Eulamprus Heatwolei ) Use Both Visual and Chemical Cues to Detect Female Sexual Receptivity
    Acta Ethol (2005) 8: 79–85 DOI 10.1007/s10211-005-0003-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Megan L. Head . J. Scott Keogh . Paul Doughty Male southern water skinks (Eulamprus heatwolei ) use both visual and chemical cues to detect female sexual receptivity Received: 14 December 2004 / Revised: 12 June 2005 / Accepted: 4 July 2005 / Published online: 2 August 2005 # Springer-Verlag and ISPA 2005 Abstract A wide range of organisms use chemical and favoured over small non-receptive females over the odour- visual cues in mate attraction and courtship; however, less control. We speculate that males use vision to find chemical discrimination relevant to reproduction and the females and then use their chemosensory ability to chem- interplay between these two types of communication are ically evaluate female sexual receptivity once the pair are in poorly understood in reptiles. We experimentally tested the close proximity. ability of male Eulamprus heatwolei, a scincoid lizard, to discriminate between sexually receptive and non-receptive Keywords Behavioural ecology . Mating system . females in two ways. First, we conducted 155 staged Chemical ecology . Courtship encounters between males and females over 29 days to determine the start and the duration of the female receptive period based on the date of copulations. These data suggest Introduction that the receptive period lasted for approximately 7 days in late October under controlled laboratory conditions. We Detecting the reproductive status of potential sexual part- also recorded 6,330 individual male and female behaviours ners is a crucial component of sexual behaviour in most during these trials to evaluate the frequency of female animals (Johnston 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
    State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to
    [Show full text]
  • 'At Risk' Species Near Wetlands and Keas Along the River Murray in SA
    Richness of ‘At Risk’ Species near Wetlands and KEAs along the River Murray in SA FINAL February 2011 Richness of 'At Risk' Species near Wetlands and KEAs This series of maps displays the number (or richness) of ‘at-risk’ species in proximity to wetlands and within Key Environmental Assets (KEAs) described in the Assessing vulnerability of fauna_climate change_SA River Murray_Final_June11.pdf report. Spatial data and research literature can be found in the Floodplain Information Package (FIP) 2012. Limitations from that report have been reproduced below: The methodology and data used in this project is detailed in the report AssessingFaunaCC_GISMethodsFeb2011.pdf. Conclusions, Limitations and Future Work Thirty-seven vertebrate fauna species (eleven fish, two frogs, nine reptiles, eleven birds and four mammals) were identified through the risk assessment process as most ‘at- risk‘ or most vulnerable under climate change in the South Australian Murray Darling Basin (from Wellington to SA-Vic Border). These are listed in Table below. Although many aspects of each species’ ecology, physiology, genetics and resilience influenced the assessments, the vulnerability of all species was driven principally by two main factors. Firstly, the forecast decrease in flood frequency, duration and extent along the River Murray resulting in a significant reduction in area and quality of foraging and breeding habitat (in particular floodplain and flowing habitat). Secondly, an increase in overall salinity levels coupled with a decrease in wetland, floodplain and river productivity and subsequent decline in diversity and abundance of flora and fauna that make up the food resources and habitat structure for all ‘at- risk‘ vertebrate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Coastal Ecosystems of East Gippsland Regional Bushfire Recovery Workshop Report
    Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report Summary of outcomes from the regional co-design workshop 1 September 2020 Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence except content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Inquiries about the licence and any use of this document should be emailed to [email protected]. Cataloguing data This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment 2020, Forests and coastal ecosystems of East Gippsland regional bushfire recovery workshop report, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, November. CC BY 4.0. ISBN 978-1-76003-351-4 This publication is available at http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/bushfire-recovery/regional-delivery- program Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 900 090 Web awe.gov.au The Australian Government acting through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence and for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying on any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered Or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14
    McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 L. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 July 2015 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture ii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture L. J. McLeay, A. Tsolos and M. K. Boyle SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5 SARDI Research Report Series No. 851 July 2015 iii McLeay, L. et al. (2015) Wildlife Interactions in SA Managed Fisheries – 2013/14 This publication may be cited as: McLeay, L. J., Tsolos, A. and Boyle, M. K. (2015). Operational Interactions with Threatened, Endangered or Protected Species in South Australian Managed Fisheries. Data Summary: 2007/08 – 2013/14. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000544-5. SARDI Research Report Series No. 851. 78pp. Cover Photos: Australian Sea Lions and Long-nosed Fur Seal pup (courtesy of Crystal Beckmann). Little Penguin (courtesy of B. Page). Leafy Seadragon (courtesy of S. Sorokin). Great White Shark (courtesy of R. Saunders). South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/ DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC OFFICER:- R Longmore (1983-2007).; Scott Keogh (2008-)
    THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 43 History of Office Bearers Formation Committee (April 1964):- MJ Littlejohn (Convenor); State Reps IR Straughan (Qld), FJ Mitchell (SA), HG Cogger (NSW), G Storr (WA), RE Barwick (ACT), JW Warren (Vic), AK Lee (Editor). First AGM (23 August 1965):- President MJ Littlejohn, Vice-President NG Stephenson, Secretary-Treasurer AA Martin, Asst Secretary-Treasurer KJ Wilson, Ordinary Members FJ Mitchell and IR Straughan, Editor AK Lee. PRESIDENT:- MJ Littlejohn (1965-69); AK Lee (1969-70); HG Cogger (1971-73); J de Bavay (1974); H Heat- wole (1975-76); GC Grigg (1976-77); MJ Tyler (1978-79); GF Watson (1979-81); AA Martin (1981-82); RS Seymour (1982-83); R Shine (1983-84); GC Grigg (1984-86); J Coventry (1986-87); RE Barwick (1987-88); J Covacevich (1988-91); M Davies (1991-92); R Shine (1992-94); A Georges (1994-6); D. Roberts (1996-98); M Bull (1998-9); R Swain (1999-2001); Sharon Downes (2001-03); J Melville (2004-2005); Dr Jean-Marc Hero (2005-2007); P Doherty (2007-2008); M Thompson (2008-) VICE-PRESIDENT:- NG Stephenson (1965-67); RE Barwick (1967-69); HG Cogger (1969-70); MJ Littlejohn (1971-72); MJ Tyler (1973); HG Cogger (1974); J de Bavay (1975-76); H Heatwole (1976-77); GC Grigg (1977-79); MJ Tyler (1979-80); GF Watson (1981-82); AA Martin (1982-83); RS Seymour (1983-84); R Shine (1984-86); GC Grigg (1986-87); J Coventry (1987-88); RE Barwick (1988-91); J Covacevich (1991-92); M Davies (1992-94); R. Shine (1994-6); A Georges (1996-98); D Roberts (1998-99); M Bull(1999-2001); R Swain (2001-2003); S Downes (2004-5); J Melville (2005-2007); J-M Hero (2007-2008); P Doherty (2008-) SECRETARY/TREASURER:- AA Martin (1965-67); GF Watson (1967-72); LA Moffatt (1973-75); J Caughley (1975-76); RWG Jenkins (1976-77); M Davies (1978-83); G Courtice (1983-87); J Wombey (1987-99); S Ke- ogh (1999-2003); N Mitchell (2004-5).
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 10, 2008 W. Linn Montgomery1 and Yael Bernstein1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640 2 SWCA Environmental Consultants, 114 N. San Francisco St. #100, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society Bernstein, Y. and W.L. Montgomery. (2008, October 10) Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss; Walbaum, 1792): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rainbowtrout.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Richard Vacirca, Gary Patton, and David Winters of the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region for the opportunity to prepare this assessment and for their assistance at many points in its preparation and finalization. Thanks are also due an anonymous reviewer for many helpful comments. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES W. Linn Montgomery received B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees from the UC Berkeley, UCLA, and Arizona State University, respectively. As a postdoctoral researcher with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, he studied the ecology of Atlantic salmon and sea-run brook trout in eastern Quebec before joining the faculty at Northern Arizona University. From 1984 to 1987, he served on, and in 1986 chaired, the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. He also served as Commission representative to the Arizona Water Quality Control Council and various committees of the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. His students have studied rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon, tilapia, native and exotic cyprinids, marine surgeonfishes, damselfishes and scorpionfishes, rattlesnakes, ephemeral pond crustaceans, crayfish, river ecology, and fish paleontology.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles (PDF 137
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi National Park, ACT – November 2018 ACT Bush Blitz Squamate Reptile Group 27/11/2018-04/12/2018 Submitted: 23/04/2019 Christiana McDonald-Spicer Damien Esquerre Ian Brennan Jessica Fenker Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 10 Bush Blitz – Namadgi National Park, ACT – November 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections
    [Show full text]