LP Scores Record-Shattering 59 Election Wins A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Iron Triangle
THE IRON TRIANGLE CHARLES J. SYKES f there was one they are about to unmistakable man- run up against one Idate from the of the state’s most November election it entrenched institu- was: don’t raise taxes. tions: the Iron Triangle. Jim Doyle won the governor’s chair back The Iron Triangle for the Democrats by The Iron Triangle saying that he would explains why spend- not raise any state ing and taxes are so taxes to close the high and so difficult state’s $2.8 billion bud- to cut here in get deficit. The public Wisconsin. apparently believed him. The other 55 per- One side of the cent who voted for Triangle consists of Scott McCallum and advocacy groups Ed Thompson also and activists who voted for candidates have a vested inter- who said they wouldn’t raise taxes. And in the est in spending programs; the second side, legislature, the GOP racked up big majorities in government bureaucracies that run the pro- both the Assembly and the Senate, running on grams; and the third, the friendly news media a no-tax platform. that can be counted on for sympathetic stories about the victims of budget cuts. Underlining the anti-tax mood, a Wispolitics.com poll in late November found Here’s an example of how it works. that 83 percent of Wisconsinites say they are Legislators propose a 5 percent cut in an somewhat opposed or strongly opposed to agency’s budget. The bureaucrats select a high- raising taxes — 66 percent saying they “strong- ly visible, popular program to cut; the advoca- ly” opposed tax hikes. -
2013-2014 Wisconsin Blue Book
STATISTICS: HISTORY 677 HIGHLIGHTS OF HISTORY IN WISCONSIN History — On May 29, 1848, Wisconsin became the 30th state in the Union, but the state’s written history dates back more than 300 years to the time when the French first encountered the diverse Native Americans who lived here. In 1634, the French explorer Jean Nicolet landed at Green Bay, reportedly becoming the first European to visit Wisconsin. The French ceded the area to Great Britain in 1763, and it became part of the United States in 1783. First organized under the Northwest Ordinance, the area was part of various territories until creation of the Wisconsin Territory in 1836. Since statehood, Wisconsin has been a wheat farming area, a lumbering frontier, and a preeminent dairy state. Tourism has grown in importance, and industry has concentrated in the eastern and southeastern part of the state. Politically, the state has enjoyed a reputation for honest, efficient government. It is known as the birthplace of the Republican Party and the home of Robert M. La Follette, Sr., founder of the progressive movement. Political Balance — After being primarily a one-party state for most of its existence, with the Republican and Progressive Parties dominating during portions of the state’s first century, Wisconsin has become a politically competitive state in recent decades. The Republicans gained majority control in both houses in the 1995 Legislature, an advantage they last held during the 1969 session. Since then, control of the senate has changed several times. In 2009, the Democrats gained control of both houses for the first time since 1993; both houses returned to Republican control in 2011. -
2015-2016 Wisconsin Blue Book: Chapter 8
STATISTICS: HISTORY 675 HIGHLIGHTS OF HISTORY IN WISCONSIN History — On May 29, 1848, Wisconsin became the 30th state in the Union, but the state’s written history dates back more than 300 years to the time when the French first encountered the diverse Native Americans who lived here. In 1634, the French explorer Jean Nicolet landed at Green Bay, reportedly becoming the first European to visit Wisconsin. The French ceded the area to Great Britain in 1763, and it became part of the United States in 1783. First organized under the Northwest Ordinance, the area was part of various territories until creation of the Wisconsin Territory in 1836. Since statehood, Wisconsin has been a wheat farming area, a lumbering frontier, and a preeminent dairy state. Tourism has grown in importance, and industry has concentrated in the eastern and southeastern part of the state. Politically, the state has enjoyed a reputation for honest, efficient government. It is known as the birthplace of the Republican Party and the home of Robert M. La Follette, Sr., founder of the progressive movement. Political Balance — After being primarily a one-party state for most of its existence, with the Republican and Progressive Parties dominating during portions of the state’s first century, Wisconsin has become a politically competitive state in recent decades. The Republicans gained majority control in both houses in the 1995 Legislature, an advantage they last held during the 1969 session. Since then, control of the senate has changed several times. In 2009, the Democrats gained control of both houses for the first time since 1993; both houses returned to Republican control in 2011. -
Third-Party Guys, the Real Threat
Third-Party Guys, The Real Threat By Lawrence R. Jacobs Washington Post, Sunday, October 19, 2003 The handicapping of the 2004 presidential election has so far ignored a potentially key factor -- the continuing and perhaps growing appeal of third parties. While the pundits focus on President Bush's chances against a stable of Democratic starters, the election next November is likely to be determined by the Green Party, the Independence Party or -- no joke -- the Libertarian Party. The omens are there. In the 2000 presidential election, third parties drew enough votes in 11 states to prevent either Bush or his Democratic rival, Al Gore, from winning a majority of votes. But the success of third parties in the 2002 gubernatorial and Senate races is, or should be, the real wake-up call. In 13 states, the number of voters who supported third-party candidates in statewide races last year was larger than the winning margin in the 2000 presidential election. Third parties may not be getting the attention they deserve because their display of electoral muscle has been so episodic. They were hardly present in the 1984 and 1988 presidential races, when the two major parties gobbled up 99 percent of the votes. But Ross Perot garnered a stunning 19 points as an independent presidential candidate in 1992 and a still impressive eight points in 1996. To those watching midterm and statewide elections, though, Perot's success shouldn't have come as a shock. When third parties have done well in midterm elections, they do well in the next presidential election. -
ALABAMA: GOVERNOR DON SIEGELMAN (D) Vs
ALABAMA: GOVERNOR DON SIEGELMAN (D) vs. REP. BOB RILEY (R) DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN Gov. Don Siegelman Rep. Bob Riley www.siegelman.com www.bobrileyforgovernor.com CM: Josh Hayes CM: Sam Daniels Press: Jim Andrews Press: Leland Whaley Media: Shorr & Assoc. Media: Alfano Productions Saul Shorr Kim Alfano Polls: Hickman Brown Polls: Market Research Institute Harrison Hickman Vern Kennedy Money Raised: $4.2 million (as of 9/30) Money Raised: $3.4 million (as of 9/30) Last Race (1998) Pop. Vote Vote % Don Siegelman (D) 760,155 58% Fob James (R) 554,746 42% Race Outlook: TOSS-UP Thanks to budget problems, an ethics investigation and charges that he’s funneled state contracts to friends and campaign donors, Gov. Don Siegelman is fighting to keep his job against Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Riley. Recent polls have consistently shown the two in a statistical dead heat, however, as recently as May, Siegelman was down 8 points to Riley. Clearly, this is not good for a first-term governor who won his last election by 16 points. A mid-September University of Alabama-Birmingham poll had Riley up 45-43% while an early September University of Southern Alabama poll showed Riley ahead 44-41%. Riley has hammered away at Siegelman’s ethics problems which include fees he’d received from his law firm while running the state (after an investigation, he was cleared) and giving state contracts to political cronies without bids from others. One of Riley’s ads boasts that he wants to “end corruption,” he’s “an honest leader,” and he kept his term-limits promise; another features an endorsement from his wife - Siegelman has stayed afloat by attacking his challenger on a variety of issues. -
Leaning Republican
LEANING REPUBLICAN The Rhodes Cook Letter December 2002 The Rhodes Cook Letter NOVEMBER 2002 / VOL. 3, NO. 6 Contents Leaning Republican . 3 Chart: Election 2002: Where Things Stand. 3 Chart: The Nationwide Vote in ‘02 for Congress and Governors. 4 Chart: The 2002 Election Compared to Midterm Elections Since 1990 . 5 Chart: Looking for Competition? Try the Gubernatorial Races . 6 Chart: The Dwindling Competition in House Races . 6 Chart: The Republican Majorities: 1994 - 2002 . 8 The Big Picture Chart and Map: 2002 Election Summary by State and Region . 9 Chart: Few Incumbents Defeated in 2002 General Election . 11 House Results Chart and Map: The House Marginals of 2002 . 12 Senate Results Chart: 2002 Senate Election Results by State . 14 Chart: 2002 Senate Elections: Small Change has Big Impact . 15 Governor Results Chart: 2002 Gubernatorial Elections: A Hotbed of Volatility . 16 Chart: 2002 Gubernatorial Election Results by State . 18 Presidents and Midterms Chart: Presidents, Midterms and the Next Election. 19 Chart: Presidential Nominees and the Midterm Bounce . 20 Changing Composition of the 107th Congress . 21 Special Election Results, 2001-02 . 22 Subscription Page . 23 The Rhodes Cook Letter is published by Rhodes Cook. Web: tion for six issues is $99. Make checks payable to “The Rhodes rhodescook.com. E-mail: [email protected]. Design Cook Letter” and send them, along with your e-mail address, by Landslide Design, Rockville, MD. “The Rhodes Cook Letter” to P.O. Box 574, Annandale, VA. 22003. See the last page of is being published on a bimonthly basis in 2002. A subscrip- this newsletter for a subscription form. -
Elections 10
Elections 10 Elections in Wisconsin: February 2010 through May 2011 primary, spring, general, and special elections 1911 Blue Book: Commissioners 866 WISCONSIN BLUE BOOK 2011 – 2012 ELECTIONS IN WISCONSIN I. The Wisconsin Electorate History of the Suffrage. When Wisconsin became a state in 1848, suffrage (the right to vote) was restricted to white or Indian males who were citizens of the United States or white male im- migrants in the process of being naturalized. To be eligible to vote, these men had to be at least 21 years of age and Wisconsin residents for at least one year preceding the election. Wisconsin extended suffrage to male “colored persons” in a constitutional referendum held in November 1849. In 1908, the Wisconsin Constitution was amended to require that voters had to be citizens of the United States. Women’s suffrage came with the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920. (Wisconsin was one of the first states in the nation to ratify this amendment, on June 10, 1919.) The most recent major suffrage change was to lower the voting age from 21 to 18 years of age. This was accomplished by the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified by the states in July 1971. Size of the Electorate. Based on information from the Department of Administration, it is estimated that in November 2008 there were about 4,331,000 potential voters 18 years of age and older. An estimated 69% of eligible voters cast 2,983,417 ballots in the 2008 presidential election. Age and Residence Requirements. -
What's Brewing in Wisconsin?; Why America's
What’s Brewing in Wisconsin?; Why America’s Dairyland Votes for Democrats in Presidential Elections and Republicans in Gubernatorial Elections Clara Schopf Hofstra University Advisor: Dr. James E. Wiley Committee: Dr. Rosanna Perotti and Valerie Rizzuto For departmental honors in Geography Department of Global Studies and Geography Spring 2015 2 Table of Contents Forward……………………………………………………………... 3 Introduction…………………………………………………………. 4 Literature Review…………………………………………………… 6 Case Study: Kenosha County, WI…………………………………... 13 Methodology………………………………………………………... 24 Results………………………………………………………………. 26 Conclusion…………………………………………………………... 41 Addendum…………………………………………………………… 44 Bibliography………………………………………………………… 48 3 Forward In the 2014 midterm elections, Democrats faced devastating losses in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. Some of the most unexpected midterm defeats happened in the state gubernatorial elections, where Republicans gained the Governorship in Massachusetts, Maryland, Arkansas, and Illinois. In the state of Wisconsin, incumbent Republican Governor Scott Walker defeated Democrat Mary Burke by over seven percent of the vote in a race that the polls had consistently considered a toss-up in the months leading up to the election. The U.S. state of Wisconsin has a long history of progressive political action, much of which continues up to the present day. In fact, Wisconsin has consistently voted to elect Democratic candidates in every presidential election throughout the past 30 years. Yet somehow, Wisconsinites reelected the highly controversial Republican Governor Scott Walker to office in 2014. However, this is not a one-time occurrence; the state of Wisconsin has elected more Republican governors than Democratic ones. Over the past 30 years, only two governors from the Democratic Party, serving a combined total of 12 years, have held the governorship.