By Chun-Ting Jake Cheng a Thesis Submitted in Conformity with The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

By Chun-Ting Jake Cheng a Thesis Submitted in Conformity with The ASSEMBLY,INTEGRATION, AND TEST OF THE INSTRUMENT FOR SPACE ASTRONOMY USED ON-BOARD THE BRIGHT TARGET EXPLORER CONSTELLATION OF NANOSATELLITES by Chun-Ting Jake Cheng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Aerospace University of Toronto Copyright c 2012 by Chun-Ting Jake Cheng Abstract Assembly, Integration, and Test of the Instrument for Space Astronomy used on-board the Bright Target Explorer Constellation of Nanosatellites Chun-Ting Jake Cheng Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Aerospace University of Toronto 2012 The BRIght Target Explorer (BRITE) constellation is revolutionary in the sense that the same scientific objectives can be achieved smaller (cm3 versus m3) and lighter (< 10kg versus 1; 000kg). It is a space astronomy mission, observing the variations in the apparent brightness of stars. The work presented herein focuses on the assembly, integration and test of the instrument used on-board six nanosatellites that form the constellation. The instrument is composed of an optical telescope equipped with a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) imager and a dedicated computer. This thesis provides a particular in-depth look into the inner workings of CCD. Methods used to characterize the instrument CCD in terms of its bias level stability, gain factor determination, saturation, dark current and readout noise level evaluation are provided. These methodologies are not limited to CCDs and they provide the basis for anyone who wishes to characterize any type of imager for scientic applications. ii Dedication To my dear parents, especially my Mother, who had taken on such a tough role to provide care, guid- ance and encouragement throughout my childhood and teenage years and continues to be my most loyal supporter. Everything good I achieve in this life will be because of your nourishment. To my friends. Thank you all for putting up with my complaints while providing me with your un- biased views. I owe it to you guys for putting some sanity back in my life during stressful times. Admittedly it can be tough to be my friend and you guys deserve my greatest gratitude for being there and unknowingly living up to my high standard for being good friends. You guys deserve all the best in your future and I have no doubt you will attain it. To Science. It is one of my greatest desires that the BRITE mission will be a spectacular success in the scientific community. Moreover, my greed compels me to wish some of the greatest mysteries in nature would be resolved through BRITE. This way I could be content in life knowing that I had played a role in contributing to a major scientific revolution. iii Acknowledgements First deserving of acknowledgement is Dr. Robert Zee for offering me the opportunity to work on a real mission and putting it to space, this probably grants me the bragging rights amongst my friends for the foreseeable future. Particularly deserving of note is his support to grant me the chance to take on spacecraft assembly, a spacecraft thermal vacuum test campaign and the Small Satellite conference eye-opening experiences. Second, to BRITE mission manager Cordell Grant, who never ceases to impress me with how he is able to manage multiple missions of such high complexity. Furthermore, I would like to credit his patience for putting up with a lot of my recurring questions which in many occasions serve as real life examples to counter proof the phrase ”there is no stupid question”. Third, to BRITE instrument electronics designer Mihail Barbu, who deserves no less credit than any other for the amount of guidance he provided throughout. Thank you very much for explaining and helping me navigate through the vast realm of electronics. Too many times it almost seemed that your mere presence would influence the electronics and cause it to fix itself (and there are times when you gently reminded me to plug it in or turn it on). But lets call it even for getting you out of the dark room. Fourth, to fellow student Jakob Lifshits, who proves to be an invaluable asset to the lab, whose de- ductive reasoning permeates through the way he converses and shows wisdom beyond his age. Fifth, to the overall lab guru Daniel Kekez, who had consistently shown me immense patience and complete willingness to explain things down to the very detail. Thank you very much for your assistance throughout my time in the group. Sixth, to Dr. Stefan Mochnacki, who provided expert guidance and input on the various aspects of instrument testing. Your guided me, a complete amateur on the topic of charge coupled device, to carry out the various testing processes and provided me with sanity checks on the ideas and procedures I came up with. Thank you also for accompanying me with the outdoor field tests and lending my your vast knowledge in astronomy. Seventh, to Dr. Rainer Kuschnig for his collaboration, guidance, and efforts during the instrument focusing process. Your valuable inputs on the star fields to image are also much appreciated. Eighth, to my second thesis reviewer, Dr. Slavek Rucinski, for his time, attention and valuable feed- back. Most importantly you are the father of BRITE constellation. This thesis, let alone the BRITE iv mission, would never have existed without your successful proposal to adopt a nanosatellite platform to perform the specific science! Last, but not least, to all the staff and students, some of you who I wish I had more chance to interact with, but I am sure I have required help from every single one of you at some point during my time at the lab. You guys have enhanced my understanding of big words such as dedication, diligence and professionalism. I wish all of you the best in your future endeavors. v Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 History of Space Telescopes and the State of the Field . 1 1.1.1 Orbiting Astronomical Observatory 2 . 2 1.1.2 International Ultraviolet Explorer . 2 1.1.3 High Precision Parallax Collecting Satellite . 3 1.1.4 Hubble Space Telescope and Charge Coupled Devices Technology . 3 1.1.5 Microvariability and Oscillations of Stars . 4 1.1.6 Swift . 5 1.1.7 Convection Rotation et Transits Planetaires´ . 6 1.2 Thesis Objectives, Contributions, and Significance . 6 2 The CanX-3 BRIght Target Explorer (BRITE) 8 2.1 The Generic Nanosatellite Bus (GNB) . 8 2.1.1 Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem . 9 2.1.2 Power Subsystem . 10 2.1.3 On-Board Computer Subsystem . 12 2.1.4 Communication Subsystem . 12 2.2 Science Objective . 13 2.3 Mission Operation . 15 2.4 Formation of the BRITE Constellation . 17 3 BRITE Instrument 18 3.1 Detector Selection - From CMOS to CCD . 19 3.2 Charge Coupled Devices (CCD) . 19 3.3 Fundamentals of CCD Operation . 20 3.3.1 Charge Generation . 21 3.3.2 Charge Storage . 21 3.3.3 Charge Transfer . 22 vi 3.3.4 Charge Readout . 23 3.4 A Two Board CCD Driver Design . 23 3.4.1 CCD Header Board . 24 3.4.2 Instrument On-Board Computer (IOBC) . 25 3.4.3 Analog Front End (AFE) Chain . 27 3.5 Instrument Telescope Assembly . 28 3.5.1 Stray Light Suppression . 28 3.5.2 Instrument Optics and Point Spread Function . 29 3.5.3 Header Tray and Focusing Mechanism . 30 4 Instrument Hardware Qualification Tests 32 4.1 Environmental Tests . 33 4.2 Hardware Model Definitions . 34 4.3 Qualification Testing . 35 4.3.1 Type I Inspection, Rework and Delta Inspection . 35 4.3.2 IOBC Unit Level Functional Test . 35 4.3.3 Instrument Room Temperature LFFT . 41 4.3.4 Payload Instrument Scientific Acceptance Test (PISAT) . 45 4.3.5 Type II Inspection, Rework and Delta Inspection . 45 4.3.6 Thermal Shock, Post Thermal Shock Inspection and LFFT . 45 4.3.7 Thermal Vacuum Test . 46 4.3.8 Vibration Testing . 49 5 BRITE Payload Instrument Scientific Acceptance Test 50 5.1 Test Overview . 50 5.2 Test Setup . 51 5.3 Data Types . 52 5.4 Bias Level and Stability Test . 53 5.4.1 Requirements . 54 5.4.2 Data Gathering . 55 5.4.3 Data Analysis and Results for UniBRITE Instrument . 55 5.5 Gain Determination . 62 5.6 Gain Measurement . 63 5.6.1 Requirement . 64 5.6.2 Data Gathering . 64 5.6.3 Data Analysis and Results . 65 5.7 Saturation Test . 72 vii 5.7.1 Requirement . 72 5.7.2 Data Gathering . 72 5.7.3 Data Analysis & Results . 72 5.8 Dark Current Test . 73 5.8.1 Requirements . 73 5.8.2 Data Gathering . 73 5.8.3 Data Analysis and Results . 74 5.9 Readout Noise Level Test . 79 5.9.1 Requirement . 80 5.9.2 Data Gathering . 80 5.9.3 Data Analysis and Results . 80 6 Instrument Integration 81 6.1 Creating an Artificial Star Field . 81 6.1.1 Collimator Setup . 82 6.2 Instrument Focusing . 83 7 Field Testing with Real Stars 88 7.1 Paramount Tracking Platform . 88 7.2 Mobile Instrument Assembly . 89 7.3 Star Observation Setup . 90 7.4 Observing the Stars . 91 7.5 Image Processing . 91 7.6 Differential Photometry . ..
Recommended publications
  • Divinus Lux Observatory Bulletin: Report #28 100 Dave Arnold
    Vol. 9 No. 2 April 1, 2013 Journal of Double Star Observations Page Journal of Double Star Observations VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 April 1, 2013 Inside this issue: Using VizieR/Aladin to Measure Neglected Double Stars 75 Richard Harshaw BN Orionis (TYC 126-0781-1) Duplicity Discovery from an Asteroidal Occultation by (57) Mnemosyne 88 Tony George, Brad Timerson, John Brooks, Steve Conard, Joan Bixby Dunham, David W. Dunham, Robert Jones, Thomas R. Lipka, Wayne Thomas, Wayne H. Warren Jr., Rick Wasson, Jan Wisniewski Study of a New CPM Pair 2Mass 14515781-1619034 96 Israel Tejera Falcón Divinus Lux Observatory Bulletin: Report #28 100 Dave Arnold HJ 4217 - Now a Known Unknown 107 Graeme L. White and Roderick Letchford Double Star Measures Using the Video Drift Method - III 113 Richard L. Nugent, Ernest W. Iverson A New Common Proper Motion Double Star in Corvus 122 Abdul Ahad High Speed Astrometry of STF 2848 With a Luminera Camera and REDUC Software 124 Russell M. Genet TYC 6223-00442-1 Duplicity Discovery from Occultation by (52) Europa 130 Breno Loureiro Giacchini, Brad Timerson, Tony George, Scott Degenhardt, Dave Herald Visual and Photometric Measurements of a Selected Set of Double Stars 135 Nathan Johnson, Jake Shellenberger, Elise Sparks, Douglas Walker A Pixel Correlation Technique for Smaller Telescopes to Measure Doubles 142 E. O. Wiley Double Stars at the IAU GA 2012 153 Brian D. Mason Report on the Maui International Double Star Conference 158 Russell M. Genet International Association of Double Star Observers (IADSO) 170 Vol. 9 No. 2 April 1, 2013 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 75 Using VizieR/Aladin to Measure Neglected Double Stars Richard Harshaw Cave Creek, Arizona [email protected] Abstract: The VizierR service of the Centres de Donnes Astronomiques de Strasbourg (France) offers amateur astronomers a treasure trove of resources, including access to the most current version of the Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS) and links to tens of thousands of digitized sky survey plates via the Aladin Java applet.
    [Show full text]
  • KEPLER-21B: a 1.6 Rearth PLANET TRANSITING the BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 Steve B
    The Astrophysical Journal, 746:123 (18pp), 2012 February 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/123 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. ∗ KEPLER-21b: A 1.6 REarth PLANET TRANSITING THE BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 Steve B. Howell1,2,36, Jason F. Rowe2,3,36, Stephen T. Bryson2, Samuel N. Quinn4, Geoffrey W. Marcy5, Howard Isaacson5, David R. Ciardi6, William J. Chaplin7, Travis S. Metcalfe8, Mario J. P. F. G. Monteiro9, Thierry Appourchaux10, Sarbani Basu11, Orlagh L. Creevey12,13, Ronald L. Gilliland14, Pierre-Olivier Quirion15, Denis Stello16, Hans Kjeldsen17,Jorgen¨ Christensen-Dalsgaard17, Yvonne Elsworth7, Rafael A. Garc´ıa18, Gunter¨ Houdek19, Christoffer Karoff7, Joanna Molenda-Zakowicz˙ 20, Michael J. Thompson8, Graham A. Verner7,21, Guillermo Torres4, Francois Fressin4, Justin R. Crepp23, Elisabeth Adams4, Andrea Dupree4, Dimitar D. Sasselov4, Courtney D. Dressing4, William J. Borucki2, David G. Koch2, Jack J. Lissauer2, David W. Latham4, Lars A. Buchhave22,35, Thomas N. Gautier III24, Mark Everett1, Elliott Horch25, Natalie M. Batalha26, Edward W. Dunham27, Paula Szkody28,36, David R. Silva1,36, Ken Mighell1,36, Jay Holberg29,36,Jeromeˆ Ballot30, Timothy R. Bedding16, Hans Bruntt12, Tiago L. Campante9,17, Rasmus Handberg17, Saskia Hekker7, Daniel Huber16, Savita Mathur8, Benoit Mosser31, Clara Regulo´ 12,13, Timothy R. White16, Jessie L. Christiansen3, Christopher K. Middour32, Michael R. Haas2, Jennifer R. Hall32,JonM.Jenkins3, Sean McCaulif32, Michael N. Fanelli33, Craig
    [Show full text]
  • The Kepler Characterization of the Variability Among A- and F-Type Stars I
    A&A 534, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics The Kepler characterization of the variability among A- and F-type stars I. General overview K. Uytterhoeven1,2,3,A.Moya4, A. Grigahcène5,J.A.Guzik6, J. Gutiérrez-Soto7,8,9, B. Smalley10, G. Handler11,12, L. A. Balona13,E.Niemczura14, L. Fox Machado15,S.Benatti16,17, E. Chapellier18, A. Tkachenko19, R. Szabó20, J. C. Suárez7,V.Ripepi21, J. Pascual7, P. Mathias22, S. Martín-Ruíz7,H.Lehmann23, J. Jackiewicz24,S.Hekker25,26, M. Gruberbauer27,11,R.A.García1, X. Dumusque5,28,D.Díaz-Fraile7,P.Bradley29, V. Antoci11,M.Roth2,B.Leroy8, S. J. Murphy30,P.DeCat31, J. Cuypers31, H. Kjeldsen32, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard32 ,M.Breger11,33, A. Pigulski14, L. L. Kiss20,34, M. Still35, S. E. Thompson36,andJ.VanCleve36 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 30 May 2011 / Accepted 29 June 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Kepler spacecraft is providing time series of photometric data with micromagnitude precision for hundreds of A-F type stars. Aims. We present a first general characterization of the pulsational behaviour of A-F type stars as observed in the Kepler light curves of a sample of 750 candidate A-F type stars, and observationally investigate the relation between γ Doradus (γ Dor), δ Scuti (δ Sct), and hybrid stars. Methods. We compile a database of physical parameters for the sample stars from the literature and new ground-based observations. We analyse the Kepler light curve of each star and extract the pulsational frequencies using different frequency analysis methods.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Cosmic Distance Ladder Ii: Standard Candles
    5. COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER II: STANDARD CANDLES EQUIPMENT Computer with internet connection GOALS In this lab, you will learn: 1. How to use RR Lyrae variable stars to measures distances to objects within the Milky Way galaxy. 2. How to use Cepheid variable stars to measure distances to nearby galaxies. 3. How to use Type Ia supernovae to measure distances to faraway galaxies. 1 BACKGROUND A. MAGNITUDES Astronomers use apparent magnitudes , which are often referred to simply as magnitudes, to measure brightness: The more negative the magnitude, the brighter the object. The more positive the magnitude, the fainter the object. In the following tutorial, you will learn how to measure, or photometer , uncalibrated magnitudes: http://skynet.unc.edu/ASTR101L/videos/photometry/ 2 In Afterglow, go to “File”, “Open Image(s)”, “Sample Images”, “Astro 101 Lab”, “Lab 5 – Standard Candles”, “CD-47” and open the image “CD-47 8676”. Measure the uncalibrated magnitude of star A: uncalibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ Uncalibrated magnitudes are always off by a constant and this constant varies from image to image, depending on observing conditions among other things. To calibrate an uncalibrated magnitude, one must first measure this constant, which we do by photometering a reference star of known magnitude: uncalibrated magnitude of reference star: ____________________ 3 The known, true magnitude of the reference star is 12.01. Calculate the correction constant: correction constant = true magnitude of reference star – uncalibrated magnitude of reference star correction constant: ____________________ Finally, calibrate the uncalibrated magnitude of star A by adding the correction constant to it: calibrated magnitude = uncalibrated magnitude + correction constant calibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ The true magnitude of star A is 13.74.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Distance Ladder
    Cosmic Distance Ladder How do we know the distances to objects in space? Jason Nishiyama Cosmic Distance Ladder Space is vast and the techniques of the cosmic distance ladder help us measure that vastness. Units of Distance Metre (m) – base unit of SI. 11 Astronomical Unit (AU) - 1.496x10 m 15 Light Year (ly) – 9.461x10 m / 63 239 AU 16 Parsec (pc) – 3.086x10 m / 3.26 ly Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes worked out the size of the Earth around 240 BCE Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes used an observation and simple geometry to determine the Earth's circumference He noted that on the summer solstice that the bottom of wells in Alexandria were in shadow While wells in Syene were lit by the Sun Radius of the Earth From this observation, Eratosthenes was able to ● Deduce the Earth was round. ● Using the angle of the shadow, compute the circumference of the Earth! Out to the Solar System In the early 1500's, Nicholas Copernicus used geometry to determine orbital radii of the planets. Planets by Geometry By measuring the angle of a planet when at its greatest elongation, Copernicus solved a triangle and worked out the planet's distance from the Sun. Kepler's Laws Johann Kepler derived three laws of planetary motion in the early 1600's. One of these laws can be used to determine the radii of the planetary orbits. Kepler III Kepler's third law states that the square of the planet's period is equal to the cube of their distance from the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Distance Scale • Distance Information Is Often Crucial to Understand the Physics of Astrophysical Objects
    The cosmic distance scale • Distance information is often crucial to understand the physics of astrophysical objects. This requires knowing the basic properties of such an object, like its size, its environment, its location in space... • There are essentially two ways to derive distances to astronomical objects, through absolute distance estimators or through relative distance estimators • Absolute distance estimators Objects for whose distance can be measured directly. They have physical properties which allow such a measurement. Examples are pulsating stars, supernovae atmospheres, gravitational lensing time delays from multiple quasar images, etc. • Relative distance estimators These (ultimately) depend on directly measured distances, and are based on the existence of types of objects that share the same intrinsic luminosity (and whose distance has been determined somehow). For example, there are types of stars that have all the same intrinsic luminosity. If the distance to a sample of these objects has been measured directly (e.g. through trigonometric parallax), then we can use these to determine the distance to a nearby galaxy by comparing their apparent brightness to those in the Milky Way. Essentially we use that log(D1/D2) = 1/5 * [(m1 –m2) - (A1 –A2)] where D1 is the distance to system 1, D2 is the distance to system 2, m1 is the apparent magnitudes of stars in S1 and S2 respectively, and A1 and A2 corrects for the absorption towards the sources in S1 and S2. Stars or objects which have the same intrinsic luminosity are known as standard candles. If the distance to such a standard candle has been measured directly, then the relative distances will have been anchored to an absolute distance scale.
    [Show full text]
  • RR Lyrae Stars As Seen by the Kepler Space Telescope
    RR Lyrae stars as seen by the Kepler space telescope Emese Plachy 1;2;3,Robert´ Szabo,´ 1;2;3∗ 1Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklos´ ut´ 15-17, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary 2MTA CSFK Lendulet¨ Near-Field Cosmology Research Group 3ELTE Eotv¨ os¨ Lorand´ University, Institute of Physics, Budapest, Hungary Correspondence*: Robert´ Szabo´ [email protected] ABSTRACT The unprecedented photometric precision along with the quasi-continuous sampling provided by the Kepler space telescope revealed new and unpredicted phenomena that reformed and invigorated RR Lyrae star research. The discovery of period doubling and the wealth of low- amplitude modes enlightened the complexity of the pulsation behavior and guided us towards nonlinear and nonradial studies. Searching and providing theoretical explanation for these newly found phenomena became a central question, as well as understanding their connection to the oldest enigma of RR Lyrae stars, the Blazhko effect. We attempt to summarize the highest impact RR Lyrae results based on or inspired by the data of the Kepler space telescope both from the nominal and the K2 missions. Besides the three most intriguing topics, the period doubling, the low-amplitude modes, and the Blazhko effect, we also discuss the challenges of Kepler photometry that played a crucial role in the results. The secrets of these amazing variables, uncovered by Kepler, keep the theoretical, ground-based and space-based research inspired in the post-Kepler era, since light variation of RR Lyrae stars is still not completely understood. Keywords: RR Lyrae stars, Kepler spacecraft, Blazkho effect, pulsating variable stars, horizontal-branch stars, pulsation, asteroseismology, nonradial oscillations 1 INTRODUCTION RR Lyrae stars are large-amplitude, horizontal-branch pulsating stars which serve as tracers and distance indicators of old stellar populations in the Milky Way and neighboring galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assaj V4 N2 1937-Feb
    Vol. IV. No.2. acbt Janrnai of tlJt J\,strnnlltttl!al ~l1!ietu of ~l1ntb lfriea Edited by: J. JACKSON, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.A.S. otnntents : THE NEARER STARS 49 By J. Jackson, M.A., D.Sc., F.~.A.S. LIST OF NEAREST STARS 61. REPLY TO PROF. MILNE'S REVIEW OF MY PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 65 By J. K. E. Halm, Ph.D., F.R.A.S. ADDENDUM TO THE REMARKS IN MY ADDRESS ON THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGIN OF ICE AGES AND MOUNTAIN BUILDING .... 68 By J. K. E. Halm, Ph.D., F.R.A.S. REVIEWS 72 OBITUARIES 74 REPORT OF COUNCIL FOR 1935-36 77 SECTIONAL REpORTS:- Comet Section 79 Variable Star Section 81 Zodiacal Light Section 82 New Telescope and a New Observing Section 86 REPORT OF CAPE CENTRE 87 REPORT OF NATAL CENTRE 90 LIST OF OFFICE BEARERS 92 Published by the Society, P.O. Box 2061, Cape Town. Price to Members and Associates-One Shilling. Price to Non-Members-Two Shillings. FEBRUARY, 1937. ~be Journal of tbt ~5tronomical ~ocidlJ of ~ontb }.frica. VOL. IV. MARCH, 1937. No.2. THE NEARER STARS. By J. JACKSON, M.A., D.Sc. (PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 1935-1936.) The structure of the universe is a subject to which astronomers rightly devote a large portion of their time. There are many methods of approach to the subject, direct and indirect. Before the first determination of a stellar distance, not quite a century ago, the scale had to be a purely arbitrary one. Halley's detection of the proper motion of a few stars in the early years of the eighteenth century was the first demonstration that the stars are not at an infinite distance, but it was not till more than half a century later that the general structure of the galactic system was first revealed by Herschel's star gauges, or counts of the number of stars visible in his telescope when pointed in different directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Eclipsing Binary Stars. Vii. the Catalog of Eclipsing Binaries Found in the Entire Kepler Data Set
    The Astronomical Journal, 151:68 (21pp), 2016 March doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. KEPLER ECLIPSING BINARY STARS. VII. THE CATALOG OF ECLIPSING BINARIES FOUND IN THE ENTIRE KEPLER DATA SET Brian Kirk1,2, Kyle Conroy2,3, Andrej Prša3, Michael Abdul-Masih3,4, Angela Kochoska5, Gal MatijeviČ3, Kelly Hambleton6, Thomas Barclay7, Steven Bloemen8, Tabetha Boyajian9, Laurance R. Doyle10,11, B. J. Fulton12, Abe Johannes Hoekstra35, Kian Jek35, Stephen R. Kane13, Veselin Kostov14, David Latham15, Tsevi Mazeh16, Jerome A. Orosz17, Joshua Pepper18, Billy Quarles19, Darin Ragozzine20, Avi Shporer21,36, John Southworth22, Keivan Stassun23, Susan E. Thompson24, William F. Welsh17, Eric Agol25, Aliz Derekas26,27, Jonathan Devor28, Debra Fischer29, Gregory Green30, Jeff Gropp2, Tom Jacobs35, Cole Johnston2, Daryll Matthew LaCourse35, Kristian Saetre35, Hans Schwengeler31, Jacek Toczyski32, Griffin Werner2, Matthew Garrett17, Joanna Gore17, Arturo O. Martinez17, Isaac Spitzer17, Justin Stevick17, Pantelis C. Thomadis17, Eliot Halley Vrijmoet17, Mitchell Yenawine17, Natalie Batalha33, and William Borucki34 1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, North American ALMA Science Center, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; [email protected] 2 Villanova University, Dept. of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, 800 E Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected] 3 Vanderbilt University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, VU Station B 1807, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; [email protected] 4 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Dept. of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, 110 8th St, Troy, NY 12180, USA 5 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR12HE, England 7 NASA Ames Research Center/BAER Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 8 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 9 J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Search for Variable Stars and Transit Timing Variations In
    A SEARCH FOR VARIABLE STARS AND TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS IN KNOWN EXOPLANETARY SYSTEMS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE BY DANIEL J. BROSSARD DR. RONALD KAITCHUCK – ADVISOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA JULY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................xi 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Objectives……………………………………………………..…………….…....1 1.2 Exoplanet Background…………………..……………………………...….….....1 1.2.1 Transit Method……………………………………………………………...….1 1.2.2. TTVs…………………………………………………………………..……..3 1.3. Variable Stars………………………………………………..………….…...6 1.3.1. Variable Star Candidates……………………………………….………..…..6 1.4. Targets…………………………………………………………………….....8 1.4.1. WASP-52 b…………………………………………….……………....…....8 1.4.2. K2-22 b…………………………………………………………………..….9 1.4.3. WD-1145+017 b……………………………….…………………………....9 1.4.4. HATS-25 b………………………………………………….……….…....…10 1.4.5. WASP-121 b…………………………………………..…………….…....…11 1.4.6. WASP-13 b……………………………………………………………...…..11 1.4.7. KPS-1 b………………………………………………………….……...…..12
    [Show full text]
  • An Ancient Extrasolar System with Five Sub-Earth-Size Planets
    The Astrophysical Journal, 799:170 (17pp), 2015 February 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/170 C 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. AN ANCIENT EXTRASOLAR SYSTEM WITH FIVE SUB-EARTH-SIZE PLANETS T. L. Campante1,2, T. Barclay3,4,J.J.Swift5, D. Huber3,6,7, V. Zh. Adibekyan8,9, W. Cochran10,C.J.Burke3,6, H. Isaacson11,E.V.Quintana3,6, G. R. Davies1,2, V. Silva Aguirre2, D. Ragozzine12, R. Riddle13, C. Baranec14, S. Basu15, W. J. Chaplin1,2, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard2, T. S. Metcalfe2,16, T. R. Bedding2,7, R. Handberg1,2, D. Stello2,7, J. M. Brewer17, S. Hekker2,18, C. Karoff2,19, R. Kolbl11,N.M.Law20, M. Lundkvist2, A. Miglio1,2, J. F. Rowe3,6, N. C. Santos8,9,21, C. Van Laerhoven22, T. Arentoft2, Y. P. Elsworth1,2,D.A.Fischer17, S. D. Kawaler23, H. Kjeldsen2, M. N. Lund2, G. W. Marcy11,S.G.Sousa8,9,21, A. Sozzetti24, and T. R. White25 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; [email protected] 2 Stellar Astrophysics Centre (SAC), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, 596 1st Street West, Sonoma, CA 95476, USA 5 Department of Astronomy and Department of Planetary Science, California Institute of Technology, MC 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6 SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Avenue #100, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 7 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney,
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Update: 2016
    Kepler Update: 2016 http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/side_image/public/thumbnails/imag e/286257main_07-3348d1-kepler-4x3_226-170.jpg?itok=hvzfdmjc The Kepler Mission NASA Discovery Mission # 10: “Are there other planets, orbiting other stars, with characteristics similar to Earth?” “The Kepler mission will challenge thousands of stars to a staring contest, you know, like the ones you used to have with your siblings when you were younger, and that you have with the cat every once in awhile?” — Davin Flateau, 365 Days of Astronomy podcast, March 1, 2009 http://www.nasa.gov/content/keplers-launch Kepler Overview • Mission Characteristics • Continuously point at a single star field in Cygnus-Lyra region except during Ka-band downlink • Roll the spacecraft 90 degrees about the line-of-sight every 3 months to maintain the Sun on the solar arrays and the radiator pointed to deep space • Monitor 150,000 main-sequence stars for planets • Mission lifetime of 3.5 years extendible to at least 6 years • Deep Space Network for telemetry • Routine contact – X-band contact twice a week for commanding, health, and status – Ka-band contact once a month for science data downlink NASA Exoplanet Archive—Detections http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/exoplanetplots/exo_dischist.png NASA Exoplanet Archive—Distribution http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/exoplanetplots/kepler_radperiod.png What I plan to talk about… … … Recovering From Emergency Mode http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/keplerbeautyshot.jpg Microlensing
    [Show full text]