Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Exoplanet Populations with NASA's Kepler Mission SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE SPECIAL FEATURE: Exploring exoplanet populations with NASA’s Kepler Mission Natalie M. Batalha1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, 94035 CA Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 3, 2014 (received for review January 15, 2014) The Kepler Mission is exploring the diversity of planets and planetary systems. Its legacy will be a catalog of discoveries sufficient for computing planet occurrence rates as a function of size, orbital period, star type, and insolation flux.The mission has made significant progress toward achieving that goal. Over 3,500 transiting exoplanets have been identified from the analysis of the first 3 y of data, 100 planets of which are in the habitable zone. The catalog has a high reliability rate (85–90% averaged over the period/radius plane), which is improving as follow-up observations continue. Dynamical (e.g., velocimetry and transit timing) and statistical methods have confirmed and characterized hundreds of planets over a large range of sizes and compositions for both single- and multiple-star systems. Population studies suggest that planets abound in our galaxy and that small planets are particularly frequent. Here, I report on the progress Kepler has made measuring the prevalence of exoplanets orbiting within one astronomical unit of their host stars in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Admin- istration’s long-term goal of finding habitable environments beyond the solar system. planet detection | transit photometry Searching for evidence of life beyond Earth is the Sun would produce an 84-ppm signal Translating Kepler’s discovery catalog into one of the primary goals of science agencies lasting ∼13 h. population statistics requires corrections for in the United States and abroad. The goal Kepler’s pixel and flux measurements (2) observation and detection biases. This is a looms closer as a result of exoplanet discov- are publicly available at the Mikulski Archive work in progress. However, occurrence rate eries made by the National Aeronautics and for Space Telescopes (MAST) (http://archive. calculations based on subsets of the data al- Space Administration’s(NASA)10thDiscov- stsci.edu/kepler). Transit searches have been ready indicate that nature produces small ery Mission, Kepler. Launched in March performed on successively larger data volumes planets relatively efficiently in the warmer 2009, the Kepler spacecraft is exploring the yielding incremental planet candidate cat- environs of a planetary system. Giant planets diversity of planets and planetary systems alogs that are hosted at NASA’sExoplanet in such orbits are orders of magnitude less within one astronomical unit (AU). The pri- Archive (NEA) (http://exoplanetarchive.ipac. frequent than their sub-Neptunian counter- mary mission objective is to determine the parts. Ironically, the hot Jupiters that com- caltech.edu). To date, approximately three- prevalence of potentially habitable, Earth-size prised the very first Doppler and transiting quarters of the data have been thoroughly planets in the galaxy. Discovering exoterrans exoplanet discoveries are actually quite rare. in the habitable zone (HZ), characterizing searched. As of this writing (April 2014), the Current results for habitable-zone planets tell those that have habitable environments, and archive is host to over 3,500 viable planet us that we may not have to look very far be- then focusing on the signatures of biological candidates (with radii smaller than twice fore happening upon a planet similar to Earth. chemistry is a path of exploration that Jupiter). All have been subjected to a series A comprehensive review of Kepler exo- stretches decades into the future. It begins of statistical tests (based on the Kepler data planet science is beyond the scope of this by determining if planets like Earth are itself) that ensure a low rate of instrumental contribution. Here, I focus on the science abundant. and astrophysical false positives (3). leading to the determination of planet oc- Kepler has a follow-up observation pro- currence rates, from the discovery catalogs ’ NASA s 10th Discovery Mission gram to increase the reliability of the catalog to the first calculations of the prevalence of From 2009 to 2013, Kepler monitored a 115- even further by (i) improving the accuracy Earth-like planets. square-degree field in the constellations of the host star properties which in turn Kepler Transforms the Discovery Space Cygnus and Lyra, collecting ultrahigh pre- improves the accuracy of the planet proper- Exoplanet discoveries trickled in at a steady cision photometry of over 190,000 stars si- ties (or changes the interpretation altogether) multaneously at a 30-min cadence. Nearly rate in the latter half of the 1990s. Approxi- and (ii) identifying bound stellar companions uninterrupted photometry is possible due mately 30 were reported with sizes ranging and line-of-sight neighbors that might in- to a heliocentric orbit and off-ecliptic point- from 0.4 to 8 Jupiter masses and orbital ing. The observations yield an evenly sam- dicate an astrophysical false positive. Ground- periods ranging from 3 to 3,800 d. Heralding pled, minimally gapped flux time series that and space-based telescopes with apertures in the new millennium, the first transiting can be searched for periodic diminutions of ranging from 1.5 to 10 m are being used to acquire high-resolution spectroscopy and light due to the transit of an exoplanet Author contributions: N.M.B. designed research, performed re- across the stellar disk in an aligned ge- high-contrast/high-spatial resolution images. search, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. ometry. The photometer was engineered to Strategic high-precision Doppler measure- The author declares no conflict of interest. achieve 20-ppm relative precision in 6.5 h ments are providing planet masses in an This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.S.B. is a guest editor for a 12th magnitude G-type main-sequence effort to delineate the transition between invited by the Editorial Board. star (1). For reference, the Earth orbiting terrestrial and giant planets. 1Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1304196111 PNAS | September 2, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 35 | 12647–12654 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 exoplanet was discovered (4, 5). The timing detections), they are estimated using a poly- 2,658 stars based on 1.5, 13, 16, 22, and 34.5 was a boon for Kepler as it was proposing to nomial fit to solar system planets (R = M0.4854) of the ∼48 mo of data acquired during the use this detection technique from space. In (6). Shown here are 3,553 Kepler discoveries primary mission (7–11). Kepler data in the 2000, Kepler was one of the three Discovery associated with 2,658 stars. Approximately prime mission were downlinked monthly but Mission proposals invited to submit a Con- 22% of the Kepler host stars are known to processed on a quarterly basis. Transit searches cept Study Report. It was selected for flight harbor multiple planet candidates. The over- and the associated planet candidate catalogs on December 20, 2001. all reliability of the catalog (80–90%) is are, therefore, referred to by the quarters As Kepler was being designed and built, discussed below. bracketing the data. The most recent planet exoplanet discoveries were growing at an The demographics of the observed pop- candidates were identified in a search of 12 accelerated pace. By the eve of Kepler’s ulation has changed remarkably. Kepler has quarters of data (Q1–Q12) where the first is launch, over 300 discoveries had been re- increased the roster of exoplanets by nearly only slightly longer than one month in du- ported including nearly 70 transiting systems. 400%. More remarkable still is the change in ration (hence the 34.5-mo time span). All non-Kepler discoveries up through April the distribution: 86% of the non-Kepler dis- Previously detected candidates are reex- 2014 are shown in Fig. 1, Left, in a plot of coveries have masses larger than Neptune amined as larger data volumes become avail- mass (or minimum mass for nontransiting whereas 85% of the Kepler discoveries have able. However, this does not occur with every planets) versus orbital period with symbols radii smaller than Neptune. Kepler is filling catalog release. Some of the candidates in the color-coded by the discovery method. (Meth- in an area of parameters space that was not cumulative archive at the NEA were discov- odologies with small numbers of discoveries previously accessible. The increase in sensi- ered with less than 34.5 mo of data and have have been left out for clarity). Collectively, tivity afforded us by Kepler has opened the not yet been reexamined. This nonuniformity there are 697 (non-Kepler)exoplanets(with floodgates to the small planets so difficult to will be resolved as Kepler completes its final a measured orbital period and radius or mass) detect from ground-based surveys. The most search and vetting of the entire 17 quarters associated with 583 unique stars. Approxi- common type of planet known to us is a (48 mo) of data acquired during its primary ’ mately 16% of these host stars are known to population that does not exist in ourown solar mission lifetime. Kepler splanetcandidate harbor multiple planets. system: the super-Earths and mini-Neptunes catalog is also known as the Kepler Object of Fig. 1, Right,showsthesamepopulation between1and4Earthradii. Interest (KOI) Catalog. However, KOIs also together with the Kepler planet candidate include events that are classified as false discoveries in the cumulative table at NEA Status of Kepler’s Discovery Catalogs alarms or astrophysical false positives. Only as of April 2014. Detections are plotted as Catalogs of Kepler’s viable planet candidates those flagged as planet candidates in the planet radius versus orbital period, and the have been released periodically since launch NEA cumulative catalog are shown in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Divinus Lux Observatory Bulletin: Report #28 100 Dave Arnold
    Vol. 9 No. 2 April 1, 2013 Journal of Double Star Observations Page Journal of Double Star Observations VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 April 1, 2013 Inside this issue: Using VizieR/Aladin to Measure Neglected Double Stars 75 Richard Harshaw BN Orionis (TYC 126-0781-1) Duplicity Discovery from an Asteroidal Occultation by (57) Mnemosyne 88 Tony George, Brad Timerson, John Brooks, Steve Conard, Joan Bixby Dunham, David W. Dunham, Robert Jones, Thomas R. Lipka, Wayne Thomas, Wayne H. Warren Jr., Rick Wasson, Jan Wisniewski Study of a New CPM Pair 2Mass 14515781-1619034 96 Israel Tejera Falcón Divinus Lux Observatory Bulletin: Report #28 100 Dave Arnold HJ 4217 - Now a Known Unknown 107 Graeme L. White and Roderick Letchford Double Star Measures Using the Video Drift Method - III 113 Richard L. Nugent, Ernest W. Iverson A New Common Proper Motion Double Star in Corvus 122 Abdul Ahad High Speed Astrometry of STF 2848 With a Luminera Camera and REDUC Software 124 Russell M. Genet TYC 6223-00442-1 Duplicity Discovery from Occultation by (52) Europa 130 Breno Loureiro Giacchini, Brad Timerson, Tony George, Scott Degenhardt, Dave Herald Visual and Photometric Measurements of a Selected Set of Double Stars 135 Nathan Johnson, Jake Shellenberger, Elise Sparks, Douglas Walker A Pixel Correlation Technique for Smaller Telescopes to Measure Doubles 142 E. O. Wiley Double Stars at the IAU GA 2012 153 Brian D. Mason Report on the Maui International Double Star Conference 158 Russell M. Genet International Association of Double Star Observers (IADSO) 170 Vol. 9 No. 2 April 1, 2013 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 75 Using VizieR/Aladin to Measure Neglected Double Stars Richard Harshaw Cave Creek, Arizona [email protected] Abstract: The VizierR service of the Centres de Donnes Astronomiques de Strasbourg (France) offers amateur astronomers a treasure trove of resources, including access to the most current version of the Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS) and links to tens of thousands of digitized sky survey plates via the Aladin Java applet.
    [Show full text]
  • KEPLER-21B: a 1.6 Rearth PLANET TRANSITING the BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 Steve B
    The Astrophysical Journal, 746:123 (18pp), 2012 February 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/123 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. ∗ KEPLER-21b: A 1.6 REarth PLANET TRANSITING THE BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 Steve B. Howell1,2,36, Jason F. Rowe2,3,36, Stephen T. Bryson2, Samuel N. Quinn4, Geoffrey W. Marcy5, Howard Isaacson5, David R. Ciardi6, William J. Chaplin7, Travis S. Metcalfe8, Mario J. P. F. G. Monteiro9, Thierry Appourchaux10, Sarbani Basu11, Orlagh L. Creevey12,13, Ronald L. Gilliland14, Pierre-Olivier Quirion15, Denis Stello16, Hans Kjeldsen17,Jorgen¨ Christensen-Dalsgaard17, Yvonne Elsworth7, Rafael A. Garc´ıa18, Gunter¨ Houdek19, Christoffer Karoff7, Joanna Molenda-Zakowicz˙ 20, Michael J. Thompson8, Graham A. Verner7,21, Guillermo Torres4, Francois Fressin4, Justin R. Crepp23, Elisabeth Adams4, Andrea Dupree4, Dimitar D. Sasselov4, Courtney D. Dressing4, William J. Borucki2, David G. Koch2, Jack J. Lissauer2, David W. Latham4, Lars A. Buchhave22,35, Thomas N. Gautier III24, Mark Everett1, Elliott Horch25, Natalie M. Batalha26, Edward W. Dunham27, Paula Szkody28,36, David R. Silva1,36, Ken Mighell1,36, Jay Holberg29,36,Jeromeˆ Ballot30, Timothy R. Bedding16, Hans Bruntt12, Tiago L. Campante9,17, Rasmus Handberg17, Saskia Hekker7, Daniel Huber16, Savita Mathur8, Benoit Mosser31, Clara Regulo´ 12,13, Timothy R. White16, Jessie L. Christiansen3, Christopher K. Middour32, Michael R. Haas2, Jennifer R. Hall32,JonM.Jenkins3, Sean McCaulif32, Michael N. Fanelli33, Craig
    [Show full text]
  • The Kepler Characterization of the Variability Among A- and F-Type Stars I
    A&A 534, A125 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics The Kepler characterization of the variability among A- and F-type stars I. General overview K. Uytterhoeven1,2,3,A.Moya4, A. Grigahcène5,J.A.Guzik6, J. Gutiérrez-Soto7,8,9, B. Smalley10, G. Handler11,12, L. A. Balona13,E.Niemczura14, L. Fox Machado15,S.Benatti16,17, E. Chapellier18, A. Tkachenko19, R. Szabó20, J. C. Suárez7,V.Ripepi21, J. Pascual7, P. Mathias22, S. Martín-Ruíz7,H.Lehmann23, J. Jackiewicz24,S.Hekker25,26, M. Gruberbauer27,11,R.A.García1, X. Dumusque5,28,D.Díaz-Fraile7,P.Bradley29, V. Antoci11,M.Roth2,B.Leroy8, S. J. Murphy30,P.DeCat31, J. Cuypers31, H. Kjeldsen32, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard32 ,M.Breger11,33, A. Pigulski14, L. L. Kiss20,34, M. Still35, S. E. Thompson36,andJ.VanCleve36 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 30 May 2011 / Accepted 29 June 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The Kepler spacecraft is providing time series of photometric data with micromagnitude precision for hundreds of A-F type stars. Aims. We present a first general characterization of the pulsational behaviour of A-F type stars as observed in the Kepler light curves of a sample of 750 candidate A-F type stars, and observationally investigate the relation between γ Doradus (γ Dor), δ Scuti (δ Sct), and hybrid stars. Methods. We compile a database of physical parameters for the sample stars from the literature and new ground-based observations. We analyse the Kepler light curve of each star and extract the pulsational frequencies using different frequency analysis methods.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Cosmic Distance Ladder Ii: Standard Candles
    5. COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER II: STANDARD CANDLES EQUIPMENT Computer with internet connection GOALS In this lab, you will learn: 1. How to use RR Lyrae variable stars to measures distances to objects within the Milky Way galaxy. 2. How to use Cepheid variable stars to measure distances to nearby galaxies. 3. How to use Type Ia supernovae to measure distances to faraway galaxies. 1 BACKGROUND A. MAGNITUDES Astronomers use apparent magnitudes , which are often referred to simply as magnitudes, to measure brightness: The more negative the magnitude, the brighter the object. The more positive the magnitude, the fainter the object. In the following tutorial, you will learn how to measure, or photometer , uncalibrated magnitudes: http://skynet.unc.edu/ASTR101L/videos/photometry/ 2 In Afterglow, go to “File”, “Open Image(s)”, “Sample Images”, “Astro 101 Lab”, “Lab 5 – Standard Candles”, “CD-47” and open the image “CD-47 8676”. Measure the uncalibrated magnitude of star A: uncalibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ Uncalibrated magnitudes are always off by a constant and this constant varies from image to image, depending on observing conditions among other things. To calibrate an uncalibrated magnitude, one must first measure this constant, which we do by photometering a reference star of known magnitude: uncalibrated magnitude of reference star: ____________________ 3 The known, true magnitude of the reference star is 12.01. Calculate the correction constant: correction constant = true magnitude of reference star – uncalibrated magnitude of reference star correction constant: ____________________ Finally, calibrate the uncalibrated magnitude of star A by adding the correction constant to it: calibrated magnitude = uncalibrated magnitude + correction constant calibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ The true magnitude of star A is 13.74.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Distance Ladder
    Cosmic Distance Ladder How do we know the distances to objects in space? Jason Nishiyama Cosmic Distance Ladder Space is vast and the techniques of the cosmic distance ladder help us measure that vastness. Units of Distance Metre (m) – base unit of SI. 11 Astronomical Unit (AU) - 1.496x10 m 15 Light Year (ly) – 9.461x10 m / 63 239 AU 16 Parsec (pc) – 3.086x10 m / 3.26 ly Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes worked out the size of the Earth around 240 BCE Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes used an observation and simple geometry to determine the Earth's circumference He noted that on the summer solstice that the bottom of wells in Alexandria were in shadow While wells in Syene were lit by the Sun Radius of the Earth From this observation, Eratosthenes was able to ● Deduce the Earth was round. ● Using the angle of the shadow, compute the circumference of the Earth! Out to the Solar System In the early 1500's, Nicholas Copernicus used geometry to determine orbital radii of the planets. Planets by Geometry By measuring the angle of a planet when at its greatest elongation, Copernicus solved a triangle and worked out the planet's distance from the Sun. Kepler's Laws Johann Kepler derived three laws of planetary motion in the early 1600's. One of these laws can be used to determine the radii of the planetary orbits. Kepler III Kepler's third law states that the square of the planet's period is equal to the cube of their distance from the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Distance Scale • Distance Information Is Often Crucial to Understand the Physics of Astrophysical Objects
    The cosmic distance scale • Distance information is often crucial to understand the physics of astrophysical objects. This requires knowing the basic properties of such an object, like its size, its environment, its location in space... • There are essentially two ways to derive distances to astronomical objects, through absolute distance estimators or through relative distance estimators • Absolute distance estimators Objects for whose distance can be measured directly. They have physical properties which allow such a measurement. Examples are pulsating stars, supernovae atmospheres, gravitational lensing time delays from multiple quasar images, etc. • Relative distance estimators These (ultimately) depend on directly measured distances, and are based on the existence of types of objects that share the same intrinsic luminosity (and whose distance has been determined somehow). For example, there are types of stars that have all the same intrinsic luminosity. If the distance to a sample of these objects has been measured directly (e.g. through trigonometric parallax), then we can use these to determine the distance to a nearby galaxy by comparing their apparent brightness to those in the Milky Way. Essentially we use that log(D1/D2) = 1/5 * [(m1 –m2) - (A1 –A2)] where D1 is the distance to system 1, D2 is the distance to system 2, m1 is the apparent magnitudes of stars in S1 and S2 respectively, and A1 and A2 corrects for the absorption towards the sources in S1 and S2. Stars or objects which have the same intrinsic luminosity are known as standard candles. If the distance to such a standard candle has been measured directly, then the relative distances will have been anchored to an absolute distance scale.
    [Show full text]
  • RR Lyrae Stars As Seen by the Kepler Space Telescope
    RR Lyrae stars as seen by the Kepler space telescope Emese Plachy 1;2;3,Robert´ Szabo,´ 1;2;3∗ 1Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklos´ ut´ 15-17, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary 2MTA CSFK Lendulet¨ Near-Field Cosmology Research Group 3ELTE Eotv¨ os¨ Lorand´ University, Institute of Physics, Budapest, Hungary Correspondence*: Robert´ Szabo´ [email protected] ABSTRACT The unprecedented photometric precision along with the quasi-continuous sampling provided by the Kepler space telescope revealed new and unpredicted phenomena that reformed and invigorated RR Lyrae star research. The discovery of period doubling and the wealth of low- amplitude modes enlightened the complexity of the pulsation behavior and guided us towards nonlinear and nonradial studies. Searching and providing theoretical explanation for these newly found phenomena became a central question, as well as understanding their connection to the oldest enigma of RR Lyrae stars, the Blazhko effect. We attempt to summarize the highest impact RR Lyrae results based on or inspired by the data of the Kepler space telescope both from the nominal and the K2 missions. Besides the three most intriguing topics, the period doubling, the low-amplitude modes, and the Blazhko effect, we also discuss the challenges of Kepler photometry that played a crucial role in the results. The secrets of these amazing variables, uncovered by Kepler, keep the theoretical, ground-based and space-based research inspired in the post-Kepler era, since light variation of RR Lyrae stars is still not completely understood. Keywords: RR Lyrae stars, Kepler spacecraft, Blazkho effect, pulsating variable stars, horizontal-branch stars, pulsation, asteroseismology, nonradial oscillations 1 INTRODUCTION RR Lyrae stars are large-amplitude, horizontal-branch pulsating stars which serve as tracers and distance indicators of old stellar populations in the Milky Way and neighboring galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assaj V4 N2 1937-Feb
    Vol. IV. No.2. acbt Janrnai of tlJt J\,strnnlltttl!al ~l1!ietu of ~l1ntb lfriea Edited by: J. JACKSON, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.A.S. otnntents : THE NEARER STARS 49 By J. Jackson, M.A., D.Sc., F.~.A.S. LIST OF NEAREST STARS 61. REPLY TO PROF. MILNE'S REVIEW OF MY PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 65 By J. K. E. Halm, Ph.D., F.R.A.S. ADDENDUM TO THE REMARKS IN MY ADDRESS ON THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGIN OF ICE AGES AND MOUNTAIN BUILDING .... 68 By J. K. E. Halm, Ph.D., F.R.A.S. REVIEWS 72 OBITUARIES 74 REPORT OF COUNCIL FOR 1935-36 77 SECTIONAL REpORTS:- Comet Section 79 Variable Star Section 81 Zodiacal Light Section 82 New Telescope and a New Observing Section 86 REPORT OF CAPE CENTRE 87 REPORT OF NATAL CENTRE 90 LIST OF OFFICE BEARERS 92 Published by the Society, P.O. Box 2061, Cape Town. Price to Members and Associates-One Shilling. Price to Non-Members-Two Shillings. FEBRUARY, 1937. ~be Journal of tbt ~5tronomical ~ocidlJ of ~ontb }.frica. VOL. IV. MARCH, 1937. No.2. THE NEARER STARS. By J. JACKSON, M.A., D.Sc. (PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 1935-1936.) The structure of the universe is a subject to which astronomers rightly devote a large portion of their time. There are many methods of approach to the subject, direct and indirect. Before the first determination of a stellar distance, not quite a century ago, the scale had to be a purely arbitrary one. Halley's detection of the proper motion of a few stars in the early years of the eighteenth century was the first demonstration that the stars are not at an infinite distance, but it was not till more than half a century later that the general structure of the galactic system was first revealed by Herschel's star gauges, or counts of the number of stars visible in his telescope when pointed in different directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Eclipsing Binary Stars. Vii. the Catalog of Eclipsing Binaries Found in the Entire Kepler Data Set
    The Astronomical Journal, 151:68 (21pp), 2016 March doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. KEPLER ECLIPSING BINARY STARS. VII. THE CATALOG OF ECLIPSING BINARIES FOUND IN THE ENTIRE KEPLER DATA SET Brian Kirk1,2, Kyle Conroy2,3, Andrej Prša3, Michael Abdul-Masih3,4, Angela Kochoska5, Gal MatijeviČ3, Kelly Hambleton6, Thomas Barclay7, Steven Bloemen8, Tabetha Boyajian9, Laurance R. Doyle10,11, B. J. Fulton12, Abe Johannes Hoekstra35, Kian Jek35, Stephen R. Kane13, Veselin Kostov14, David Latham15, Tsevi Mazeh16, Jerome A. Orosz17, Joshua Pepper18, Billy Quarles19, Darin Ragozzine20, Avi Shporer21,36, John Southworth22, Keivan Stassun23, Susan E. Thompson24, William F. Welsh17, Eric Agol25, Aliz Derekas26,27, Jonathan Devor28, Debra Fischer29, Gregory Green30, Jeff Gropp2, Tom Jacobs35, Cole Johnston2, Daryll Matthew LaCourse35, Kristian Saetre35, Hans Schwengeler31, Jacek Toczyski32, Griffin Werner2, Matthew Garrett17, Joanna Gore17, Arturo O. Martinez17, Isaac Spitzer17, Justin Stevick17, Pantelis C. Thomadis17, Eliot Halley Vrijmoet17, Mitchell Yenawine17, Natalie Batalha33, and William Borucki34 1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, North American ALMA Science Center, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA; [email protected] 2 Villanova University, Dept. of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, 800 E Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected] 3 Vanderbilt University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, VU Station B 1807, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; [email protected] 4 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Dept. of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, 110 8th St, Troy, NY 12180, USA 5 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR12HE, England 7 NASA Ames Research Center/BAER Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 8 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 9 J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Search for Variable Stars and Transit Timing Variations In
    A SEARCH FOR VARIABLE STARS AND TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS IN KNOWN EXOPLANETARY SYSTEMS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE BY DANIEL J. BROSSARD DR. RONALD KAITCHUCK – ADVISOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA JULY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................xi 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Objectives……………………………………………………..…………….…....1 1.2 Exoplanet Background…………………..……………………………...….….....1 1.2.1 Transit Method……………………………………………………………...….1 1.2.2. TTVs…………………………………………………………………..……..3 1.3. Variable Stars………………………………………………..………….…...6 1.3.1. Variable Star Candidates……………………………………….………..…..6 1.4. Targets…………………………………………………………………….....8 1.4.1. WASP-52 b…………………………………………….……………....…....8 1.4.2. K2-22 b…………………………………………………………………..….9 1.4.3. WD-1145+017 b……………………………….…………………………....9 1.4.4. HATS-25 b………………………………………………….……….…....…10 1.4.5. WASP-121 b…………………………………………..…………….…....…11 1.4.6. WASP-13 b……………………………………………………………...…..11 1.4.7. KPS-1 b………………………………………………………….……...…..12
    [Show full text]
  • An Ancient Extrasolar System with Five Sub-Earth-Size Planets
    The Astrophysical Journal, 799:170 (17pp), 2015 February 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/170 C 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. AN ANCIENT EXTRASOLAR SYSTEM WITH FIVE SUB-EARTH-SIZE PLANETS T. L. Campante1,2, T. Barclay3,4,J.J.Swift5, D. Huber3,6,7, V. Zh. Adibekyan8,9, W. Cochran10,C.J.Burke3,6, H. Isaacson11,E.V.Quintana3,6, G. R. Davies1,2, V. Silva Aguirre2, D. Ragozzine12, R. Riddle13, C. Baranec14, S. Basu15, W. J. Chaplin1,2, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard2, T. S. Metcalfe2,16, T. R. Bedding2,7, R. Handberg1,2, D. Stello2,7, J. M. Brewer17, S. Hekker2,18, C. Karoff2,19, R. Kolbl11,N.M.Law20, M. Lundkvist2, A. Miglio1,2, J. F. Rowe3,6, N. C. Santos8,9,21, C. Van Laerhoven22, T. Arentoft2, Y. P. Elsworth1,2,D.A.Fischer17, S. D. Kawaler23, H. Kjeldsen2, M. N. Lund2, G. W. Marcy11,S.G.Sousa8,9,21, A. Sozzetti24, and T. R. White25 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; [email protected] 2 Stellar Astrophysics Centre (SAC), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, 596 1st Street West, Sonoma, CA 95476, USA 5 Department of Astronomy and Department of Planetary Science, California Institute of Technology, MC 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6 SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Avenue #100, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 7 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney,
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Update: 2016
    Kepler Update: 2016 http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/side_image/public/thumbnails/imag e/286257main_07-3348d1-kepler-4x3_226-170.jpg?itok=hvzfdmjc The Kepler Mission NASA Discovery Mission # 10: “Are there other planets, orbiting other stars, with characteristics similar to Earth?” “The Kepler mission will challenge thousands of stars to a staring contest, you know, like the ones you used to have with your siblings when you were younger, and that you have with the cat every once in awhile?” — Davin Flateau, 365 Days of Astronomy podcast, March 1, 2009 http://www.nasa.gov/content/keplers-launch Kepler Overview • Mission Characteristics • Continuously point at a single star field in Cygnus-Lyra region except during Ka-band downlink • Roll the spacecraft 90 degrees about the line-of-sight every 3 months to maintain the Sun on the solar arrays and the radiator pointed to deep space • Monitor 150,000 main-sequence stars for planets • Mission lifetime of 3.5 years extendible to at least 6 years • Deep Space Network for telemetry • Routine contact – X-band contact twice a week for commanding, health, and status – Ka-band contact once a month for science data downlink NASA Exoplanet Archive—Detections http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/exoplanetplots/exo_dischist.png NASA Exoplanet Archive—Distribution http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/exoplanetplots/kepler_radperiod.png What I plan to talk about… … … Recovering From Emergency Mode http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/keplerbeautyshot.jpg Microlensing
    [Show full text]