DOCSLIB.ORG

Engaged in Internal Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engaged in Internal Proceedings ÓÀØÀÒÈÅÄËÏÓ ÓÔÒÀÔÄÂÉÉÓÀ ÃÀ ÓÀÄÒÈÀÛÏÒÉÓÏ ÖÒÈÉÄÒÈÏÁÀÈÀ ÊÅËÄÅÉÓ ×ÏÍÃÉ GEORGIAN FOUNDATION FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES EXPERT OPINION MAMUKA KOMAKHIA BEHIND THE SCENES: KREMLIN’S POLICIES TOWARDS GEORGIAN OCCUPIED TERRITORIES 43 2015 The publication is made possible with the support of the US Embassy in Georgia. Editor: Jeffrey Morski Technical Editor: Artem Melik-Nubarov All rights reserved and belong to Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including electronic and mechanical, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Copyright © 2015 Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies ISSN 1512-4835 ISBN 978-9941-0-7962-7 Introduction Following the Russia-Georgia war of 2008 and Russia’s recognition of the Abkhazian and “South Ossetian” regimes as sovereign states, the Kremlin intensified its policies towards the two breakaway regions. The Kremlin’s growing interest in these regions has been manifested in the activities of the various departments in the executive branch of the Russian govern- ment focused on the development of relations with Abkhazia and “South Ossetia” and the integration of these regions into the Russian Federation. After the Russia-Georgia conflict, Russian state agencies have had limited coverage in Georgia. Besides security services and ministries, two govern- mental agencies representing the executive branch of the Russian govern- ment, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Presidential Administration, are especially active in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and “South Os- setia”. This article, on the basis of open source monitoring and analysis, will at- tempt to identify the state agencies and public officials behind the de- velopment and implementation of the Kremlin’s policies towards Georgia and especially in terms of the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and “South Ossetia”. Federal Agency for the CIS, Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation One of the objectives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Fed- eration is the conducting of information warfare against Georgia on the international arena and the employment of “soft power” to impact Geor- gian political life. In this regard, the Russian Center for International Sci- entific and Cultural Cooperation (RCISCC), operating under the Ministry, has been its primary foreign policy instrument since the 1990s. The Center provided funding for various cultural and humanitarian events in Georgia in 1994-2008. On September 6, 2008, as per the Russian presidential decree, a brief pe- riod after the conclusion of the Russia-Georgia war, the RCISCC was re- placed by the Federal Agency for the CIS, Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation (Rossotrudnichestvo)1 under the auspices of the Ministry. The principal objectives for the establishment of 3 the Agency are the improvement of Russia’s foreign image following the war with Georgia and the enhancement of Russia’s influence in the near and far abroad. The Agency operates in three key areas: humanitarian cooperation, public diplomacy and support for international development. Due to the relations between Georgia and Russia, the Agency’s activities in Georgia are limited; although, by means of its structural units, it funds various initiatives in Abkhazia and “South Ossetia” which are territories beyond the control of the central government of Georgia. The Department of the Russian Cen- ter of Science and Culture (RCSC) and Multilateral Cooperation within the CIS, headed by Sergey Medvedev, is tasked with maintaining relations with Abkhazia and “South Ossetia” while the development of relations with the breakaway regions has been the direct responsibility of the Division on the CIS, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, headed by Lydia Diachenko. On its initiative, on December 18, 2009, a representative office of the Agency was opened in Sokhumi2 and on September 6, 2010 – in Tskhinvali.3 The offices are headed by Russian Embassy staff and their key priorities are as follows: development of bilateral cultural, educational, scientific and technical as well as information links; cultural and educational activities involving Russian compatriots and the development of ties between international, regional and local organizations. The first Head of the Agency, Farit Mukhametshin, was replaced, as of March 5, 2012, by a prominent representative of the Russian political elite, Konstantin Kosachev, who frequently makes anti-Georgian statements and is an avid supporter of the Abkhazian and “South Ossetian” regimes. A member of the Federation Council, Lyubov Glebova, has been appointed as the Head of the Agency as of March 23, 2015. She replaced Kosachev who, in December 2014, became a member of the Federation Council and the Chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Prior to her ap- pointment, Glebova’s contact with the Abkhazian and “South Ossetian” regimes was minimal. Previously, Glebova, while serving as Head of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science (Rosobrnadzor), had insignificant contact with Abkhazia when thede facto Minister of Edu- cation, writer Daur Natchkebia, was awarded an Honorary Silver Order of the Russian Fund for “Public Recognition.” One of the signatures on the document certifying the award belonged to Glebova.4 4 Directorate for Interregional Relations and Cultural Contacts with For- eign Countries Several structural units under the Presidential Administration of Russia are tasked with working on Georgia-related issues. Among them is the Direc- torate for Interregional Relations and Cultural Contacts with Foreign Coun- tries, founded in March 2005. The key functions of the Directorate are the following: project design and implementation in the field of interregional and cultural ties with foreign countries and provision of information and analytical support to the President and the Head of the Presidential Ex- ecutive Office on issues of interregional and cultural relations with foreign countries.5 Against the background of the Rose and Orange Revolutions and owing to its targeted activities against the Georgian and Ukrainian governments, the Directorate has also been referred to as a “Counterrevolutionary Di- rectorate.” Following the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, the Directorate’s role with respect to Georgia has weakened. The breakaway regions of Abkha- zia and “South Ossetia”, where until 2013 the entity has played a key role, have become a priority area in the Directorate’s activities. Modest Kolerov The first Head of the Directorate, Modest Kolerov, led the development and implementation of the Kremlin’s policies against the “colored revolutions” in the post-Soviet space. During Kolerov’s tenure at the Kremlin, a number of organizations and information resources were established which were to help achieve the objectives of the Directorate. Among them, notewor- thy is the Regnum news agency (regnum.ru) with Kolerov still serving as its Chief Editor. The agency is well-known for its pro-government position and propagation of misinformation against Georgia. In order to achieve his objectives, Kolerov also employed the Caucasus Institute for Democracy and the Eurasian Studies Center, which presently continue to carry out Kremlin-funded projects. A special role is attributed to the Europe Pub- lishing House6 which was founded in 2005 under Kolerov’s guidance and publishes books of an anti-Western and anti-Georgian content. Sergey Vinokurov Despite the efforts of Modest Kolerov, his work was considered unsatis- factory and he was obliged to leave the Kremlin in 2007. As of that year, Kolerov was replaced by Sergey Vinokurov who, according to widely ac- 5 cepted belief, yielded to the Kremlin’s unsuccessful policy towards the unrecognized regions of “South Ossetia” and Transnistria in 2012. The Kremlin-favored candidates failed to win the illegitimate presidential elec- tions conducted in these regions. The Kremlin’s candidate of choice was “South Ossetia’s”de facto Minister of Emergency Situations, Anatoliy Bibi- lov, although the former de facto Minister of Education, Alla Dzhioyeva, won the election instead. In the spring of 2012, a repeat election was held in “South Ossetia” where a new Kremlin-backed candidate, Leonid Tibilov, gained the majority of the votes. In Transnistria, as per Vinokurov’s rec- ommendation, Moscow supported the Parliamentary Speaker, Anatoliy Kaminski, who lost the 2011 de facto presidential elections to the oppo- sitionist, Yevgeny Shevchuk. Shevchuk received no support from Moscow and, furthermore, was criticized. The accountability for failure in both illegitimate elections was imposed on Vinokurov since his Directorate was in charge of the election campaigns. The disgraced official was then ap- pointed as Deputy Head of the Foreign Intelligence Service.7 Vladimir Chernov Vladimir Chernov was appointed Head of the Directorate on April 28, 2012. Until January 17, 2012, Chernov headed the Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov’s Secretariat. Following his appointment as the Head of the Directorate, Chernov conducts periodic meetings with the de facto lead- ers of Abkhazia and “South Ossetia” to discuss bilateral relations.8 He also frequently congratulates them on holidays, including on anniversaries of the “victory against Georgia.”9 With Chernov’s appointment, his Deputy, Vladislav Gasumyanov, resigned from his position. In July 2012, Gasumya- nov’s post was occupied by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized
    Borderization in Georgia: Sovereignty Materialized Edward Boyle∗ Abstract This paper shall examine the process of borderization that has been proclaimed as occurring along the Georgian-South Ossetian boundary. This boundary is one that remains largely unrecognized, as the claims of the Georgian state to sovereignty over South Ossetia are accepted by the majority of the international community. The crucial exception to this is Russia, under whose aegis this process of borderization is occurring. The result is the creation of a physical barrier around the territory of South Ossetia, one that seeks to materialize what was previously an administrative fiction on the ground, halting the movement of people and goods across this border and dividing people from their livelihoods. The paper shall consider what meaning this fencing has within the context of Georgia’s borders, and reflect upon the larger lessons that can be drawn for the concept of sovereignty and the status of borders in the contemporary world. Reporting the Border On April 15, 2014, three crew members of a Tbilisi-based television station were detained by Russian forces close to the village of Adzvi bordering South Ossetia. TV3 announced that its reporter Bela Zakaidze, cameraman Vakhtang Lekiashvili and broadcast technician Mikheil Mikhoev had been detained while working on a report about the shifting of the boundary between South Ossetia and Georgia deeper into Georgian-controlled territory. RES, South Ossetia’s official news agency, citing the South Ossetian Special Envoy for Post-Conflict Issues, Murat Jioev, reported that “three Georgian citizens were detained in the vicinity of South Ossetia … for violating the state border.” 1 Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement that Russian border guards, protecting the boundary between Georgia and South Ossetia as per the agreement between the governments of Russia and South Ossetia, had arrested three Georgian journalists and that, “According to the rules the detainees were transferred to the South Ossetian authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • South Ossetia's Unification Referendum Poses a Dilemma for Both Georgia
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/10/26/south-ossetias-unification-referendum-poses-a-dilemma-for-both-georgia-and-russia/ South Ossetia’s unification referendum poses a dilemma for both Georgia and Russia On 19 October, the President of South Ossetia announced plans to hold a referendum on the territory’s unification with Russia. Till Spanke writes that while two previous referendums have been held following the territory’s declaration of independence from Georgia in 1990, a further referendum is unlikely to be welcomed in either Tbilisi or Moscow. He argues that there are few immediate advantages for Russia of pursuing a unification in the current climate and it is likely South Ossetia will come under pressure to delay or cancel the referendum process. South Ossetia, a breakaway region on the territory of Georgia in the South Caucasus, has announced its plan to hold a referendum on unification with the Russian Federation. This development may not come as a surprise for observers of the region, yet the announcement puts Georgia and Russia in a difficult situation as it comes at an inconvenient point in time for both countries. The region’s de facto president Leonid Tibilov informed the media on 19 October about his decision to initiate a referendum on joining the Russian Federation after a meeting with Vladislav Surkov, the Russian president’s advisor for separatist matters, according to the South Ossetian news agency Res. This would be the third referendum of its kind since 1992. South Ossetia and Russia South Ossetia declared independence from Georgia in 1990, which ultimately resulted in the South Ossetian War of 1991 and 1992 that was fought between Georgian and South Ossetian forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence
    N°70 - January 31 2008 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS SPOTLIGHT P. 1-3 Politics & Government c Medvedev’s Last Battle Before Kremlin Debut SPOTLIGHT c Medvedev’s Last Battle The arrest of Semyon Mogilevich in Moscow on Jan. 23 is a considerable development on Russia’s cur- Before Kremlin Debut rent political landscape. His profile is altogether singular: linked to a crime gang known as “solntsevo” and PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS sought in the United States for money-laundering and fraud, Mogilevich lived an apparently peaceful exis- c Final Stretch for tence in Moscow in the renowned Rublyovka road residential neighborhood in which government figures « Operation Succession » and businessmen rub shoulders. In truth, however, he was involved in at least two types of business. One c Kirillov, Shestakov, was the sale of perfume and cosmetic goods through the firm Arbat Prestige, whose manager and leading Potekhin: the New St. “official” shareholder is Vladimir Nekrasov who was arrested at the same time as Mogilevich as the two left Petersburg Crew in Moscow a restaurant at which they had lunched. The charge that led to their incarceration was evading taxes worth DIPLOMACY around 1.5 million euros and involving companies linked to Arbat Prestige. c Balkans : Putin’s Gets His Revenge The other business to which Mogilevich’s name has been linked since at least 2003 concerns trading in P. 4-7 Business & Networks gas. As Russia Intelligence regularly reported in previous issues, Mogilevich was reportedly the driving force behind the creation of two commercial entities that played a leading role in gas relations between Russia, BEHIND THE SCENE Turkmenistan and Ukraine: EuralTransGaz first and then RosUkrEnergo later.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence N°66 of November 22 2007) and About Whom Legal Char- the Hatchet Ges Are Never Ending
    N°67 - December 6 2007 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS KREMLIN P. 1-3 Politics & Government c KREMLIN Half-tinted election triumph c Half-tinted election triumph Election No, it wasn’t a resounding victory... Taking into account the means deployed, the multitude LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS Special of manipulations practice throughout the country abouty the level of participation and the c The Winers and losers of on the number of votes obtained by United Russia, the score of 64% in favour of the presi- December 2 dential party (and therefore Vladimir Putin), it could not be completely satisfactory for the Kremlin. It is ALERT far from the standard of 70% that many of those close to the President had announced as probable and so c Yevgeny Shkolov, or the it is natural that Vladimir Putin expressed his displeasure with these results and that he did not even see "Dresden connection" in the fit to visit the headquarters of United Russia Sunday night. Interior ministry FOCUS Also, this result does nothing to ease the embarassment that the Kremlin finds itself in concerning the c The strange confession by process of succession of Vladimir Putin. Even if it consecrates the pre-eminence of United Russia in the Oleg Shwartzman Duma (it passes from 305 to 315 seats), even if it confirms the popularity of Vladimir Putin with a majority BEHIND THE SCENE of Russians, this election changes nothing fundamental. It justifies the fact that Vladimir Putin can be des- c Vladimir Zhirinovsky : the little secrets behind an elec- ignated as Prime minister (but we hardly had any doubts about the fact that this could be technically pos- tion list sible), it could provide a basis for the creation of a status of “national leader” but it cannot hide the inter- nal contradiction in which the elites still find themselves : that Putin leaves the Kremlin while still remaining P.
    [Show full text]
  • Abkhazia: Deepening Dependence
    ABKHAZIA: DEEPENING DEPENDENCE Europe Report N°202 – 26 February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. RECOGNITION’S TANGIBLE EFFECTS ................................................................... 2 A. RUSSIA’S POST-2008 WAR MILITARY BUILD-UP IN ABKHAZIA ...................................................3 B. ECONOMIC ASPECTS ....................................................................................................................5 1. Dependence on Russian financial aid and investment .................................................................5 2. Tourism potential.........................................................................................................................6 3. The 2014 Sochi Olympics............................................................................................................7 III. LIFE IN ABKHAZIA........................................................................................................ 8 A. POPULATION AND CITIZENS .........................................................................................................8 B. THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL POLL ..................................................................................................10 C. EXTERNAL RELATIONS ..............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 82 • May 2012
    Issue 82 • May 2012 Implications of the Eurozone crisis for EU the continuation of this Western leadership preserve. The foreign policy - costs and opportunities voting weights are such that if the old West votes together in mutual support, as they have just done in both cases, Europe, or more precisely the eurozone, has become a they cannot be outvoted by the rest of the world. But now big problem for the world economy. This has profound the BRICS begin to discuss the feasibility of setting up implications for European foreign policy. Foreign ministers their own BRICS development bank, motivated at least may turn the other way, with remarks like ‘not our fault’, and in part by the slow and limited recognition by the West seek to get on with their business of making a better world of their underrepresentation. The BRICS have ample with projection of European values into the international capacity to do this on a grand scale. Brazil points out arena, no doubt stressing their continuing commitment to a that its own development bank alone has a balance sheet normative multilateral order. twice that of the World Bank. Sidelining of the World Bank would have major implications for the economic But this approach does not fly. The immediate consequence policy norms prevailing in global finance. The Europeans of the eurozone crisis is the degradation of reputation of the in particular, supposedly multilateralism’s best friend, European Union as a whole on two accounts: as a model of would be fostering a structural development at the level competent economic policy management, and as a model of global finance over which they would have no voice of enlightened regional integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia the Caucasus
    CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS Volume 13 Issue 4 2012 CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS Journal of Social and Political Studies Published since 2000 Volume 13 Issue 4 2012 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 1 Volume 13 IssueFOUNDED 4 2012 AND PUBLISHEDCENTRAL ASIA AND BYTHE CAUCASUS INSTITUTE INSTITUTE OF FOR CENTRAL ASIAN AND STRATEGIC STUDIES OF CAUCASIAN STUDIES THE CAUCASUS Registration number: 620720-0459 Registration number: M-770 State Administration for Ministry of Justice of Patents and Registration of Sweden Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press®. SWEDEN Registration number: 556699-5964 Journal registration number: 23 614 State Administration for Patents and Registration of Sweden E d i t o r i a l C o u n c i l Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council ISMAILOV Tel./fax: (994 - 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Murad ESENOV Editor-in-Chief Tel./fax: (46) 920 62016 E-mail: [email protected] Jannatkhan Deputy Editor-in-Chief EYVAZOV Tel./fax: (994 - 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Timur represents the journal in Kazakhstan (Astana) SHAYMERGENOV Tel./fax: (+7 - 701) 531 61 46 E-mail: [email protected] Leonid represents the journal in Kyrgyzstan (Bishkek) BONDARETS Tel.: (+996 - 312) 65-48-33 E-mail: [email protected] Saodat OLIMOVA represents the journal in Tajikistan (Dushanbe) Tel.: (+992-37) 221 89 95; (+992) 907 72 82 25 (mobile phone) E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Farkhad represents the journal in Uzbekistan (Tashkent) TOLIPOV Tel.: (9987-1) 125 43 22 E-mail: [email protected] Ziya KENGERLI represents
    [Show full text]
  • An Ambivalent 'Independence'
    OswcOMMentary issue 34 | 20.01.2010 | ceNTRe fOR eAsTeRN sTudies An ambivalent ‘independence’ Abkhazia, an unrecognised democracy under Russian protection NTARy Wojciech Górecki Me ces cOM Abkhazia – a state unrecognised by the international community and depen- dent on Russia – has features of a democracy, including political pluralism. This is manifested through regularly held elections, which are a time of ge- tudies nuine competition between candidates, and through a wide range of media, s including the pro-opposition private TV station Abaza. astern e The competing political forces have different visions for the republic’s deve- lopment. President Sergei Bagapsh’s team would like to build up multilateral foreign relations (although the highest priority would be given to relations 1 Despite the lack of with Russia), while the group led by Raul Khajimba, a former vice-president international recognition, entre for it seems unreasonable c and present leader of the opposition, would rather adopt a clear pro-Moscow to use the form ‘self- orientation. It is worth noting that neither of the significant political forces appointed’ or ‘so-called’ president, or to append wants Abkhazia to become part of Russia (while such proposals have been inverted commas to the term (which also con- made in South Ossetia), and a majority of the Abkhazian elite sees Russia’s NTARy cerns other Abkhazian recognition of the country’s independence as a Pyrrhic victory because Me officials and institutions) it has limited their country’s room for manoeuvre. However, all parties are because Bagapsh in fact performs this agreed in ruling out any future dependence on Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • ICC-01/15 13 October 2015 Original
    ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 1/160 EO PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/15 Date: 13 October 2015 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Joyce Aluoch, Presiding Judge Judge Cuno Tarfusser Judge Péter Kovács SITUATION IN GEORGIA Public Document with Confidential, EX PARTE, Annexes A,B, C, D.2, E.3, E.7, E.9, F H and Public Annexes 1, D.1, E.1, E.2, E.4, E.5, E.6, E.8,G ,I, J Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-01/15 1/160 13 October 2015 ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 2/160 EO PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Mrs Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Defence Support Section Mr Herman von Hebel Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section No. ICC-01/15 2/160 13 October 2015 ICC-01/15-4 13-10-2015 3/160 EO PT Table of Contents with Confidential, EX PARTE, Annexes C, D,E.3, E.7,E.9 H and Public Annexes, A, B,D, E.1, E.2, E.4, E.5, E.6, E.8, F,G,I,J................................................................................................1 Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 ....................................1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening the Russian–Georgian Railway Link Through Abkhazia
    CORE POLICY BRIEF 05 2013 Visiting Address: Hausmanns gate 7 gate Hausmanns Address: Visiting NO Grønland, 9229 PO Box (PRIO) Oslo Institute Research Peace Opening the Russian– Georgian railway link - 0134 Oslo, Norway Oslo, 0134 through Abkhazia A challenging Georgian governance initiative [email protected] www.projectcore.eu (CORE) India and Europe in Resolution Conflict and Governance of Cultures Soon after the parliamentary elec- Key Questions tion in 2012 Georgia’s new gov- ernment declared its willingness to How important is the restoration of the railway link for Georgia and Abkha- reconstruct and reopen the former zia, and particularly for the purpose of railway communication link with conflict resolution between the two? Russia through Abkhazia, which What are the political risks involved in the railway project? ISBN: ISBN: www.prio.no was interrupted as a result of the Does the new initiative meet the in- 978 978 Georgian–Abkhaz war in 1993. terests of all countries in the Caucasus - - 82 82 - - With its confidence-building charac- 7288 7288 region? - - 515 516 ter, the initiative is part of a broader - - 0 7 (print) Georgian foreign policy strategy aimed at re-establishing political and (online) economic relations with Russia, a development that would represent a significant geopolitical challenge for the countries of the South Cauca- sus. The initiative will test Tbilisi’s ability to prevent any changes to Abkhazia’s current political status and to keep the project purely eco- nomic in nature. Nona Mikhelidze Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) Opening the railway: A confidence- building measure The victory of Bidzina Ivanishvili’s coalition in the 2012 parliamentary elections in Georgia has brought about a fundamental change to the Georgian–Abkhaz peace process.
    [Show full text]