Committee Agenda

COMMITTEE AGENDA

11 September 2015 8.30am Wynn Williams House, Level 5, 47 Hereford Street

GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 1

Committee Members

UDS Independent Chair Bill Wasley

Christchurch City Council Mayor Lianne Dalziel, Councillors Paul Lonsdale and Phil Clearwater

Environment Canterbury Commissioners Dame Margaret Bazley, Peter Skelton and Rex Williams

Selwyn District Council Mayor Kelvin Coe, Councillors Malcolm Lyall and Mark Alexander

Waimakariri District Council Mayor David Ayers, Councillors Jim Gerard and Neville Atkinson

Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Sir Mark Solomon and Lisa Tumahai

New Zealand Transport Agency (observer) Jim Harland

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (observer) John Ombler

Canterbury District Health Board (observer) David Meates

UDS Implementation Manager Keith Tallentire ph 9418590

Committee Adviser Warren Brixton ph 9415216 2 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 3

Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee (UDSIC) Terms of Reference (2015)

1. Purpose The UDSIC is a joint committee within the meaning of the Local Government Act 2002. In 2015 it absorbed additional functions from the former Recovery Strategy Advisory Committee established by the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority in 2012. Local authority members are Christchurch City Council, Waimakariri District Council, Selwyn District Council and Canterbury Regional Council. The joint committee has additional public body representation from tangata whenua and other agencies. It has been established to oversee implementation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (UDS), provide advice to the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery and ensure integration between earthquake recovery activity and longer term urban development activity, including: † Providing clear and united leadership in delivering the UDS vision and principles; † Promoting integration with the Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch, associated recovery plans and programmes including the implementation of the Land Use Recovery Plan (LURP) and Natural Environment Recovery Programme (NERP); and, † Supporting the delivery of aligned tangata whenua objectives as outlined in Ngāi Tahu 2025 and the Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan 2013. The Committee is a formal joint committee pursuant to the Local Government Act 2002, (Schedule 7, Section 30). The Local Authorities have resolved that the Committee is not discharged at the point of the next election period (in line with clause 30 (7) of schedule 7).

2. Membership The local authorities and Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu shall each appoint up to three representatives, including their respective Mayors, Chair and Kaiwhakahaere. The Chief Executives of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) and Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB), and the Regional Director of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) attend as observers and have speaking rights but in a non-voting capacity. There shall be an Independent Chair (non-elected member), appointed by the Committee, who has speaking rights and voting capacity. The standing voting membership is limited to 16 members (including the Independent Chair), but with the power to co-opt up to a maximum of two additional non-voting members where required to ensure effective implementation. The Committee shall also appoint a Deputy Chair, who shall be elected at the commencement of each triennium, and who shall be a member of the Committee. In accordance with Section 30A of Schedule 7 to the Local Government Act 2002, the quorum at a meeting of the Committee shall be eight voting members. Other representatives of voting and non-voting organisations are permitted to attend meetings of the Committee; however attendance at any public excluded session shall only be permitted with the prior approval of the Chair. Likewise, speaking rights of other representatives at Committee meetings (whether in public session or not) shall only be granted with the prior approval of the Chair. GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 4

3. Meeting Frequency

Monthly, or as necessary and determined by the Independent Chair. Notification of meetings and the publication of agendas and reports shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Part 7 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

4. Committee Delegations The UDS Implementation Committee is delegated the following functions in support of its overall purpose: General † Overseeing implementation of the UDS and recovery documents, including the LURP, NERP and associated documents, such as the Greater Christchurch Transport Statement † Advising the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery and the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority on the development and implementation of the Recovery Strategy and any associated matters, including programmes, plans, projects, systems, processes and resources led by CERA or any other central government agency for the purposes of the recovery of greater Christchurch (as defined in the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011) † Ensuring the integration between the UDS and any of the foregoing matters † Ensuring organisational systems and resources support implementation † Monitoring and reporting progress against actions and milestones † Managing any risks identified in implementation † Identifying and resolving any implementation inconsistencies arising from partner consultation processes † Facilitating consultation and establishing forums as necessary to support implementation and review † Periodically reviewing and recommending any adjustments to the UDS and recovery documents, including the LURP and NERP.

Specific † Selecting and appointing an Independent Chair and Deputy Chair † Taking responsibility for implementing any actions specifically allocated to the Committee † Implementing a Memorandum of Understanding, as adopted by the Committee for each triennial period, to provide and maintain partnership relationships and provide for the resolution of any conflict † Advocate for statements of intent of council owned companies to be aligned to implementation of the UDS and recovery documents, including the LURP and NERP where appropriate. † Champion integration and implementation through partner strategies, programmes, plans and policy instruments (including the Regional Policy Statement, Regional and District Plans, Long Term Plans (LTPs), Annual Plans, transport programmes and triennial agreements) and through partnerships with other sectors such as health, education and business. † Establish protocols to ensure that implementation, where necessary, is consistent, collaborative and/or coordinated to achieve optimal outcomes. † Making submissions, as appropriate, on Government proposals and other initiatives relevant to the implementation of the UDS and recovery documents, including the LURP and NERP. GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

Agenda Items

Page no 1. Apologies 9

2. Declaration of Interest 9 3. Deputations by Appointment 9

4. Confirmation of Minutes 9 5. Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan Update 17

6. Canterbury Regional Economic Development Strategy 19

7. Canterbury Economic Outlook 21

8. UDS Refresh Project Update 23

9. Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan 31

10. UDSIC secretariat update 35 11. The Thirty Year New Zealand Infrastructure Plan 2015 - Summary 49

12. Recovery Programmes Update 51 13. Central City Parking Plan Update 53

14. Resolution to Exclude the Public 61 6 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 7 S t a n d i n g I t e m s 8 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 9

1. APOLOGIES

2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.

3. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT

4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

It is recommended that the Committee confirm the minutes (both open and public excluded) of its meeting on 14 August 2015. 10 11

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE (UDSIC)

Held at Wynn Williams House, Level 5, 47 Hereford Street, Christchurch on 14 August 2015 at 9.00am

PRESENT: Urban Development Strategy (UDS) Bill Wasley (Independent Chair) Christchurch City Council Mayor Lianne Dalziel, Councillor Phil Clearwater and Councillor Paul Lonsdale Environment Canterbury Commissioners Dame Margaret Bazley, Rex Williams and Peter Skelton Selwyn District Council Mayor Kelvin Coe, Councillor Mark Alexander Waimakariri District Council Mayor David Ayers, Councillor Neville Atkinson Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Sir Mark Solomon

The meeting was adjourned for purposes of a workshop from 9.00am to 9.15am

The Chairman tabled a revised Agenda for the meeting, which was agreed to.

1. APOLOGIES

Apologies for absence were received from Elizabeth Cunningham (Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu) and Councillors Malcolm Lyall (Selwyn District Council Council) and Jim Gerard (Waimakariri District Council), Messrs. David Meates (Canterbury District Health Board), John Ombler (Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Authority) and Jim Harland (New Zealand Transport Agency), for absence and Mayor Lianne Dalziel for lateness. Mayor Lianne Dalziel who arrived at 9.07am, left the meeting at 10.40am and returned at 11.05am and Mayor Kelvin Coe left the meeting at 10.40am.

Moved: Neville Atkinson Seconded: Sir Mark Solomon

2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

No declarations were made.

3. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT

* UDS partners in respect of this matter are the Christchurch City Council, Selwyn District Council, Waimakariri District Council, Environment Canterbury, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and New Zealand Transport Agency. 12

Nil

4. CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES OF 10 JULY 2015

The Committee received the minutes of the previous meeting of 10 July 2015

Moved: Peter Skelton Seconded: Paul Lonsdale

11. UDS PARTNERSHIP SUBMISSION ON THE DRAFT TRANSITION RECOVERY PLAN

The Committee considered the submission made on the draft Transitional Recovery Plan, submitted to CERA on the 30 July 2015. A draft of the submission had previously been circulated to Mayors and Chairs and Chief Executives for feedback.

The Committee ratified the UDS Partnership submission on the draft Transitional Recovery Plan.

Moved: Peter Skelton Seconded: Dame Margaret Bazley

12. UDS PARTNERSHIP SUBMISSION ON THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION'S 'USING LAND FOR HOUSING' INQUIRY DRAFT REPORT

The Committee agreed to ratify the UDS Partnership submission on the Productivity Commissions 'Using land for housing' inquiry draft report.

Moved: Dame Margaret Bazley Seconded: Mayor Kelvin Coe

8. UPDATE FROM COMMITTEE SECRETARIAT

The report dealt with: · Greater Christchurch Bus Tour - a request was made for a future bus tour to also consider coast and estuary issues · Provisional Agenda for next UDSIC meeting - to have an economic 'theme' to presentations.

The Committee decided to receive the report.

Moved: Sir Mark Solomon Seconded: Mark Alexander

7. RECOVERY PROGRAMMES UPDATE

The report primarily covered updates during the period to 16 July 2015. Further information and clarification was sought in relation to the whole of recovery monitoring and reporting framework, the recovery lessons and legacy initiative and the parking plan for An Accessible City.

It was confirmed that Environment Canterbury had approved the draft Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan and submitted this to the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery.

The Committee decided to receive the report.

Moved: Neville Atkinson Seconded: Mayor Kelvin Coe

5. 100 RESILIENT CITIES -PRELIMINARY RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT AND FOCUS AREAS

Mike Gillooly, Chief Resilience Officer, Christchurch City Council spoke to his presentation contained in the Agenda.

He particularly referred to the challenges to be met, the key questions to be considered and sought direction from the meeting, as to the integration with the UDS Refresh and the future role of UDSIC in relation to the 100RC programme.

The Committee agreed to: · Hold over any discussion on the presentation until the UDS Refresh Project Planning report is considered · Receive the report

Moved: Mark Alexander Seconded: Mayor Lianne Dalziel.

6. UDS REFRESH PROJECT PLANNING

In conjunction with this item a letter from Dame Jenny Shipley, Chair of the Advisory Board on Transition to the UDS Chair, setting out the Advisory Board's proposals for the transition to long term recovery arrangements was tabled at the meeting

The Chair reminded members of the Committee's decision at the last meeting to seek feedback from CEAG on further developing proposals to undertake a UDS 'refresh' with a deadline for completion of April 2016.

Bill Bayfield Chief Executive, Environment Canterbury referred to discussions held at the CEAG meeting referring to an opportunity to work with the CDHB on a stakeholder engagement process and the tightness of the April deadline to achieve this, preferring July 2016 as an alternative date.

He undertook to come back to the next meeting on behalf of CEAG to lay out a programme for delivering a UDS Refresh for meeting the April 2016 date as a platform for further community engagement thereafter.

6 Cont'd The Committee agreed to:

a) Note the proposed UDS refresh delivery structures and timelines as discussed to ensure a refreshed UDS by April 2016 as a platform for community engagement by July 2015 b) Note that a suitable co-location space is to be utilised c) Note that CEAG has agreed that the identified UDS project budget be utilised for the UDS refresh and is considering how any additional budget needs would be borne amongst the partners. d) Confirm the establishment of a UDS Stakeholder forum, with Terms of Reference to be reported back to the September meeting of UDSIC. e) Note that the Project Advisor and Project Sponsor are working with the Project Leader to finalise a more detailed project plan and the nature of the phased approach for reporting back to UDSIC but in the interim work is commencing on the UDS refresh. f) Endorse the establishment of a UDSIC working group with a representative from each strategic partner who are members of the UDSIC, with such members being Neville Atkinson (WDC), Peter Skelton (Ecan) and Mayor Lianne Dalziel (CCC), with Selwyn District Council and TRoNT identifying their representatives at the earliest opportunity. NZTA and CDHB observers would also be included in working group discussions.

Moved: Neville Atkinson Seconded: Dame Margaret Bazley

9. PROGRESS ON CHRISTCHURCH HOUSING ACCORD FUND DEVELOPMENTS

Michael Read, Director of Social Housing Unit and Christchurch Housing Accord Fund (MBIE) provided a power point presentation covering progress with three developments located at:

· Awatea/Carrs Road · Welles Street · Colombo Street

The Committee agreed to receive the presentation.

Moved: Sir Mark Solomon Seconded: Dame Margaret Bazley

10. HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OVERVIEW

Tim Allen, Manager, Canterbury Investment Plan and Ray Tye, Stakeholder Relations Manager (HNZC) provided a power point presentation titled 'Towards a Thriving Christchurch' including:

· Recovery and future investment · Where we are now · Recent development · Going forward · Future portfolio and investment · Proposed portfolio reconfiguration · Understanding development constraints

10 Cont'd Discussion centred on issues relating to the development master-planning being undertaken in the Shirley area.

The Committee agreed to receive the presentation.

Moved: Sir Mark Solomon Seconded: Mark Alexander

13. 'HOUSING MATTERS' AND 'BUILD BACK SMARTER PROJECT UPDATES

Nick Collins, Beacon Pathway and Tony Moore (CCC) provided the Committee with a verbal update on the 'Housing Matters' and 'Build Back Better' projects. They also referred to the formation of Canterbury Sustainable Homes Working Party which came together after the Canterbury earthquake and which has sponsored a number of initiatives. A power point presentation on these matters would be circulated to the Committee.

The Build Back Smarter initiative was entering a new phase over the next two years and extended to the Selwyn and Waimakariri districts.

The Committee decided to receive the update

Moved: Sir Mark Solomon Seconded: Paul Lonsdale

14. RESOLUTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC

It was agreed on the motion of Peter Skelton, Seconded by Mark Atkinson, that the resolution to exclude the public set out on page 67 of the Agenda be adopted.

The meeting closed at 11.55am

5. WAIMAKARIRI RESIDENTIAL RED ZONE RECOVERY PLAN UPDATE

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To receive an update from CERA and Waimakariri District Council on recent activity in relation to the Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan and seek endorsement for some modifications to the Waimakariri FURZ Steering Group Terms of Reference. Further information with be supplied at or before the meeting of the Committee.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the update. 18 19 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

6. CANTERBURY REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To receive a presentation from Jim Palmer, Chief Executive of Waimakariri District Council (on behalf of the Canterbury Mayoral Forum) updating the committee on the recently released Canterbury Regional Economic Development Strategy.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the presentation. 20 21 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

7. CANTERBURY ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To receive a presentation from Nick Brunsdon, Economic Analyst at the Canterbury Development Corporation updating the committee on the Canterbury Economic Outlook.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the presentation. 22 23 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

8. UDS REFRESH PROJECT UPDATE

Author: Keith Tallentire, UDS Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To provide an update to the Committee on the delivery of the UDS Refresh project and seek agreement to terms of reference for the Stakeholder Forum and UDSIC working group.

Background

1. This Committee agreed at its meeting in August that a Refresh of the UDS occur by April 2016 as a platform for wider community engagement through to July 2016. It also agreed that the Refresh incorporate the 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) project and that an engagement process similar to that used by the CDHB health system transformation programme be investigated.

2. The meeting resolutions also confirmed the establishment of a Stakeholder Forum and a working group of UDSIC with regard to the UDS Refresh project.

Stakeholder Forum

3. Early establishment of a UDS stakeholder forum is recommended to maximise the potential for wider buy-in to both the process and the strategic directions contemplated as part of the UDS. 4. Proposed Terms of Reference for the Stakeholder Forum are included as Attachment A to this report and endorsement of these is sought from this Committee. 5. The Committee might wish to ask the Forum if they wish to suggest any alterations to these proposed Terms of Reference before formally endorsing them.

UDSIC working group

6. Partners have all now confirmed representatives to be part of this working group and a first meeting of the group has been held. 7. Proposed Terms of Reference for this UDSIC working group are included as Attachment B to this report and endorsement of these is also sought from this Committee.

Project delivery

8. CEAG have confirmed the project delivery arrangements to meet the above timeframes and a detailed project initiation document is being prepared in alignment with the broad scope outlined at the previous meetings of UDSIC. 24 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

9. Central to the UDS Refresh delivery is a core project team (CPT). This has staff representation from strategic partners and is now operating from dedicated office premises. It will work in liaison with refer a partner staff reference group to ensure a two-way flow of information and ideas. 10. The project delivery structures and an initial breakdown of the timelines and milestones is included as Attachment C. 11. Further detail and explanation will be presented to the Committee at the meeting.

Recommendation

That the Committee: a) Note the proposed UDS Refresh project delivery arrangements outlined in the report b) Agree the proposed Terms of Reference for the Stakeholder Forum c) Agree the proposed Terms of Reference for the UDSIC working group. 25

Urban Development Strategy Stakeholder Forum Terms of Reference (2015)

1. Purpose The UDS Stakeholder Forum is a body comprising representatives of groups from the Greater Christchurch business and community sectors which provides strategic advice and thinking to the UDS Implementation Committee (UDSIC) in relation to the development and implementation of the UDS. In the first instance this specifically relates to the UDS Refresh initiative endorsed by the strategic partners. This includes promoting ongoing innovation and maintaining joined up approaches.

2. Role The UDS Stakeholder Forum provides a knowledge pool of business and community views and information that can inform strategic decision-making by UDSIC. The Forum acts as a 'think tank' to assist integration and consensus building through a solutions orientated approach to working with strategic partners. In the first instance the Forum will provide advice on and contribute to the UDS Refresh: § project plan - process elements, methodology and engagement mechanisms § draft UDS Refresh output milestones - prepared between September 2015 and April 2016 § final draft UDS Refresh output - as a platform for wider engagement § enduring framework and mechanism for stakeholder and business/community engagement and thought leadership The strategic partners recognise that the success of a long term well-being strategy for Greater Christchurch is dependent on effective engagement with local communities and businesses and on approaches that enable local decision-making to the greatest extent possible while achieving shared outcomes. The Forum is a practical mechanism to assist collaborative dialogue to this end at a Greater Christchurch level but is not a substitute for more local and/or targeted engagement in respect of specific initiatives and projects.

3. Membership The UDS Stakeholder Forum shall comprise of up to sixteen representatives from organisations from across Greater Christchurch invited to participate by the UDSIC. The Forum representation should aim to reflect community and business sector interests across the broad range of issues and communities of interest that are central to the UDS. The UDS Independent Chair is also a member of the Forum. Forum representatives are responsible for engaging with, as far as possible, members of their organisation and field of interest to bring representative views into the work of the Forum and assist in feedback. Alternates from the same organisation of Forum representatives can be sent to Forum meetings in the absence of the nominated person. The Forum can invite guest presenters and co-opt additional representatives on a time limited basis to enable effective consideration of issues and the provision of advice to UDSIC. The operation of the Forum will be supported by the UDS Implementation Manager and relevant strategic partner staff.

4. Operational The UDS Stakeholder Forum reports to the UDSIC, through both formal written reports and oral 26 communication at UDSIC meetings as appropriate. The Forum is chaired by the UDS Independent Chair and appoints a Deputy Chair to act in the absence of the Chair. The Forum does not have delegated decision-making making from UDSIC. It provides formal advice to UDSIC to assist informed decision-making by that formal joint committee. The Forum will periodically hold joint meetings with the UDSIC to assist in building relationships, trust and understanding between the two bodies and the provision of advice. The Forum is responsible for determining its own agenda and meeting frequency, but should have regard to requests by UDSIC and CEAG. The Forum will agree a meetings protocol that enables open and respectful engagement and recognises that representatives may hold differing views. In the first instance the business of the Forum is to be focused on supporting the UDS Refresh. Forum meetings are open to the public unless otherwise agreed by the Chair to enable effective dialogue and confidential and/or sensitive matters. The Forum cannot direct the work of any strategic partner staff. Forum representatives are not authorised to speak publicly on behalf of the Forum without the agreement of the Chair. 27

UDSIC 'UDS Refresh' Working Group - Terms of Reference

Membership The working group is to have a representative from each of the partners, and in respect of the local government partners this is to be a governance representative who is on the UDSIC. In respect of other partners, representatives may be staff of those organisations preferably with knowledge and understanding of the partnership and UDS. The working group may also co-opt others from time to time to assist it in undertaking it’s role and tasks. The group is to be an advisory group and has no decision-making role. It is to provide guidance and direction. The group is to be chaired by the Independent Chair, Bill Wasley. Other partner representatives are: Mayor Lianne Dalziel (Christchurch City Council) Commissioner Peter Skelton (Environment Canterbury) Cr Malcom Lyall (Selwyn District Council) Cr Neville Atkinson (Waimakariri District Council) Dianne Turner (Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu) Jim Harland (Regional Director, NZTA) David Meates (Chief Executive, CDHB)

Meetings

It is to meet in between UDSIC meetings, both on a regular and on an ‘as and when’ required basis.

Role of Working Group

· Advise the core project team of political and any emerging issues during project roll-out · Provide guidance on ways to address issues particularly where they transcend multiple partners · Maintain strong awareness of the project outcomes and delivery phases · Assist in communicating the project back to respective partner agencies · Assist in ensuring partner agency endorsement at key project milestones · Work collaboratively to address any partner divergence on issues

1 28 UDS REFRESH ORGANISATIONAL CHART / DELIVERY

REFRESHED GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

PROJECT ADVISOR BILL WASLEY

WORKI PARTNERS NG GROUP

PROJECT SPONSOR JILL ATKINSON / DON CHITTOCK KEY PARTNERS REPRESENTATIVES WDC TRONT SDC CERA CCC CDHB ECAN NZTA PROJECT LEADER KEITH TALLENTIRE

PROJECT MANAGER KIRSTY MAHONEY / LEGAL TRACY COUCHMAN (REMOTE) FINANCE FACILITATOR DESIGNER GIS VISIONING PROJECT ASSISTANT PROJECT ADVISORS DELIVERY LEAD COMMUNICATIONS PRINTERS MILLY WOODS RORY SMEATON, CHELSEA HALLIWELL RICHARD HAMILTON / PEER REVIEWER JOHN MEEKER AND ROSS DENTON DR ANNA STEVESON (TBC) EDITOR

CORE PROJECT TEAM OUTLINE PROGRAMME FOR WORKSTREAMS

EXPECTED NO. OF PEOPLE ENGAGED WITH: 400 - 500 150 500 500 150 5000 15,000 - 20,000 TIMELINE: SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL TECHNICAL

Workshop inputs

ENGAGEMENT

Establish Stakeholder Forum

Procure Team

Stakeholder Workshop

– Invite Stakeholders

– 1 Hour Sessions

– 10 Stakeholders

– 2 Day Workshop (Create Story)

– Champion cause (Mini Stories)

– Follow up Workshop

Showcase Events

– Stakeholders (Design Lab)

– Public (Roadshow) 31 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

9. LYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN UPDATE

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To update the committee on the Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the report. 32 33

To Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee (UDSIC) From Sheila Watson, General Manager, Recovery Strategy & Planning, CERA Security Level In Confidence – Strategic Partners and Observers Only Date 3 September 2015 Action Discuss the contents of this memo at UDSIC meeting on 11 September 2015 Contact/s Andrew Hammond, 03 354 2791

Subject: Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan Update

Purpose This paper is to update you on the progress of the Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan.

Background In June 2014, the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery directed the Lyttelton Port Company and Environment Canterbury to prepare a draft Lyttelton Port Recovery Plan (the draft Recovery Plan). The preliminary draft underwent a period of public consultation which involved receiving written submissions and undertaking a hearing process chaired by the Honourable Sir Graham Panckhurst (Chair).

The hearings panel delivered its report and recommendations to Environment Canterbury on 6 July 2015. The Environment Canterbury Commissioners approved the draft Recovery Plan and delivered it to the Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Authority on 13 August 2015.

Discussion The draft Recovery Plan was publicly notified on Saturday 15 August 2015 with the written comment period closing on Monday 31 August 2015. Copies of the draft Recovery Plan were available on the CERA website, and at Council offices, service centres and libraries. Environment Canterbury wrote to those who submitted on the preliminary draft Recovery Plan to inform them of the notification of the draft Recovery Plan.

Written comments were received from 13 people and organisations on the draft Recovery Plan. There was support for all or large parts of the draft Recovery Plan and the overall process. No new material issues/matters were raised in the written comments. Matters raised in the written comments included: • cruise ship berth location • ferry terminal location • heritage value of pre-1900 wharfs • traffic on Norwich Quay • the risk assessment for the bulk liquids storage facilities • zoning of land • Mahinga kai • Fire Service requirements

Lead by example See it through Work together Have an impact Find a way 1

Next Steps The Minister will be provided with advice in dealing with recommendations for any changes to the draft Recovery Plan (if any are considered necessary). The Minister will then inform Cabinet of his decision. The final Recovery Plan is expected to be gazetted late October 2015.

Recommendations It is recommended that the Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee: • Note the contents of this paper.

Lead by example See it through Work together Have an impact Find a way 2

35 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

10. UPDATE FROM COMMITTEE SECRETARIAT

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To update the Committee on operational matters.

Changes to UDSIC representation

Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu have advised of a change to their representative to UDSIC (Attachment A).

UDSIC 14 August 2015

The presentation on the Canterbury Sustainable Homes Working Party, Build Back Smarter and the Housing Matters Workshop which was received at the UDSIC meeting on 14 August 2015 is attached to this report (Attachment B).

Response to the Advisory Board on Transition

The Independent Chair responded to the letter from Dame Jenny Shipley regarding implementation of the recommendations from the Board's First Report. The response letter, which followed liaison with partner Chief Executives is attached to this report (Attachment C).

Provisional agenda for next UDSIC meeting

Provisional items for the next meeting of this Committee on Friday 9th October 2015 include: § Strengthening the Youth Sector § Natural Environment Recovery Programme update § Health Precinct update § Sports and Recreation Recovery update § Metrosports Update

Provisional items for the November meeting: § Regenerate Christchurch (joint update CCC/CERA) § Margaret Mahy Playground/Avon River precinct update 36 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

All scheduled future meeting dates are: § Friday 09th October § Friday 06th November § Friday 11th December

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the report.

Attachments

A Letter regarding the Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu representation change B Presentation from Beacon Pathway and Christchurch City Council C Correspondence from the Independent Chair to Dame Jenny Shipley ATTACHMENT A 37 38 39 Canterbury Sustainable Homes Working Party

Industry Local / Regional Government

ATTACHMENT B New Zealand Institute Architects (NZIA) Environment Canterbury (Ecan) Architectural Designers New Zealand (ADNZ) Christchurch City Council (CCC) New Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC) Selwyn District Council (SDC) Building Research Association of New Zealand (BRANZ) Waimakariri District Council (WDC)

Central Government Health Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) Community Public Health (CDHB) Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)

NGOs Lifetime Designs (Lifemark) Tenants Protection Association Christchurch (TPA) Community Energy Action (CEA) Beacon Pathway Inc 40 Housing Matters

Learn, Share, Connect, Collaborate, Innovate 41 Housing Matters

Learn Share Connect Collaborate Innovate 42 Questions That Matter…

1. Site Visits of exemplar development 2. Learning about quality medium density housing 3. Encouraging Dialogue/Debate/Discussion 4. Demographics, market demands and housing forecasting 5. Delivery of social and affordable housing 6. Innovative financing and risk management approaches 7. Value delivered from off-site manufacture 8. Optimising development location and form 9. The value of going beyond the code 10. Placemaking and neighbourhoods 11. Collaboration and Open Table 43 44 45 46 Want a warmer, Free, independent, drier, healthier no obligation, face to face advice home that’s about:  Insulation cheaper to run?  Heating  Ventilation  Lighting  Glazing  Draft stopping  Curtains  Water efficiency  Healthy home tips  Funding support ATTACHMENT C 47

17 August 2015 Our ref: 1104

Dame Jenny Shipley Chair of the Advisory Board on Transition Private Bag 4999 Christchurch 8140

Dear Dame Jenny

Thank you for your letter of 13 August 2015, and I wish to advise that I tabled it at the meeting of the Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee on 14 August 2015. I understand you have sent similar letters to the chief executives of strategic partners so I have liaised with them to provide you with a coordinated response.

I wish to confirm that the Committee are actively considering the recommendations contained in the Board’s First Report.

In respect of the specific matters you referred to, I wish to advise as follows:

 That the Committee has confirmed that refresh of the UDS is to occur and that process is already underway. The intention is to have a reinvigorated UDS completed by April 2016 to provide a platform for broader community engagement through to July 2016.

 The Committee are very focused on maintaining a joined up approach. To this end a Forum across partners, regional leaders and a broad range of sectors representatives has also been endorsed. The terms of reference and membership of the forum will be considered in September by the Committee with a first meeting planned shortly thereafter.

 Matters relating to the visible leadership group, naming of the UDSIC and the interface with central government on UDS issues are also being considered as part of the refresh process and the Committee welcome the notion of a 'step change' in this regard as we enter this next phase of recovery and regeneration.

The UDSIC is more than happy to present and discuss with the Board any of the matters outlined.

Yours sincerely

Bill Wasley Independent Chair Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee

49 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

11. NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE UNIT: THIRTY YEAR NEW ZEALAND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN

Author: Keith Tallentire, UDS Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To provide the Committee with a summary of the National Infrastructure Unit's Thirty Year New Zealand Infrastructure Plan, which was released on 20 August 2015.

Report

1. The Thirty Year New Zealand Infrastructure Plan 2015 was released by the National Infrastructure Unit on 20 August. The plan focusses on the six infrastructure sectors; transport, telecommunications, energy, three waters, productive water and social infrastructure. The two desired outcomes from this long term plan are the better use of existing infrastructure, and the better allocation of new investment.

2. A number of key challenges in planning for resilient and coordinated infrastructure are identified. These include; infrastructure nearing the end of its life, affordability constraints, aging population, changing populations and uneven distribution of population increases, infrastructure provision for increased productivity, changing technology, infrastructure "pinch- points", the international economy, infrastructure to support the growing Maori economy. The plan puts forward a framework for responding to these challenges. The framework for infrastructure planning is comprised of three iterative steps, which are; determining levels of service, mature asset management and optimised decision making.

3. The first step in the response framework is gaining a greater understanding of the levels of service required, which is a departure from an asset-driven approach to planning for infrastructure. In order to move towards this approach, greater collaboration, integrated land use planning, a clear vision alignment between individual investment decisions and economic goals, and consideration of whole-of-life infrastructure costs are identified within the plan as critical.

4. Strengthening asset management practices is the second step of the response framework. It is considered essential for entities to have a good understanding of the assets that they have, the condition that they are in and how they contribute to service provision. Analysis of future asset needs is also important, as is a broader understanding of resilience to include attributes such as organisational performance, service delivery, adaptation, community preparedness, responsibility, interdependencies, financial strength and continuity. Three factors necessary for best practise asset management are identified, and these are: setting the right institutional incentives, the efficient use of asset management skills, and collecting the right kind of data using shared data standards.

5. The third step in the response framework is effective decision making processes. In order for this process to be optimised, the plan identifies a number of factors that need to be strengthened. These include having the right structures in place around governance and ownership, and having tools available for decision makers to both engage with communities and to make decisions prioritising investment. The plan promotes an increased focus on demand 50 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

management and examination of the effects of changing behaviours on existing infrastructure. Addressing issues within the regulatory system in order to provide higher levels of confidence to people and businesses is seen as important to enabling good decision making. Building greater procurement capability, and ensuring the full range of tools are considered during the investment decision making process is also identified as important in this step of the framework.

6. An action plan is included as an appendix to the plan, and includes a number of actions specific to each step of the response framework. The actions relating to determining levels of service include investigating options to support long term integrated regional infrastructure plans, potentially with legislative recognitions incorporating central and local government objectives. Actions aiming to strengthen asset management include the development of metadata standards for roads, buildings and water; establishing regional centres of excellence for the collation and making available the data obtained through shared metadata standards. Actions aiming to enable decision making are focussed on procurement, RMA changes and a longer term review of planning legislation and alignment.

7. The Plan is available online at www.infrastructure.govt.nz/plan.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the report. 51 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

12. RECOVERY PROGRAMMES UPDATE

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To receive an update on implementation in relation to the range of recovery programmes in sup• port of the Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch Mahere Haumanutaga o Waitaha.

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the update. 52 53 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

13. CENTRAL CITY PARKING PLAN UPDATE

Author: Keith Tallentire, Urban Development Strategy Implementation Manager Contact: 03 941 8590

Purpose

To update the Committee on Central City Parking Plan, as requested at the UDSIC meeting on 13 August 2015.

A memorandum from Christchurch City Council (Strategy and Planning) is attached to this report (Attachment A).

Recommendation

That the Committee receive the report. 54 55 Christchurch City Council Strategy and Planning Group Memo

Central City Parking Plan UDSIC update

Date: 31 August 2015

From: Ruth Hudson, Strategy and Planning Group

To: UDSIC

Cc: Mike Theelen

Purpose

The purpose of this memo is to provide an update to UDSIC on parking in the Central City, which was requested at the last UDSIC meeting on 13 August 2015.

Parking need

The supply of parking is a complex area, with supply and demand for parking constantly changing. Private sector investment is fundamental to the recovery of the Central City. Developers and prospective tenants want confidence that there will be adequate and easily accessible parking before they commit. Both the oversupply and the undersupply of parking would have significant implications for the Central City recovery. To estimate how much parking supply is needed, Council and CCDU jointly prepared the Christchurch Central Parking Plan. ECan and NZTA were also part of the document approval process as it formed part of the An Accessible City work programme.

Christchurch Central Parking Plan

The Christchurch Central Parking Plan (Parking Plan) was adopted by Council in May 2015. It is a non- statutory, live document which is supported by a parking model.

The Parking Plan forecasts the current and likely future (to 2041) parking demand and supply for the central city. This is based on the Urban Development Strategy projected land use scenario which shows the expected increase in the number of people living, working and visiting the central city. The data is used to estimate parking demand and supply for a range of activity types. The model uses the same mode shift projections as An Accessible City. Using this information, the Parking Plan identifies the likely locations of parking facilities needed to support the central city.

Short stay parking encourages people to visit the central city and helps to support people accessing the business, hospitality and retail sectors. The priority for the Council is to focus on the delivery of short stay (visitor, less than 3 hours) parking rather than long stay (commuter, longer than 3 hours) to encourage visitors and to support businesses. This may be through the rebuild of Council owned parking buildings, and provision of other parking areas and / or by working with the private sector to deliver parking. Long stay parking, as before the earthquakes, can be delivered through both private developments, shared public / private parking and by encouraging people to use other transport options.

The Parking Plan is intended to provide the key source of information for the Council, Crown and the development and business communities alike in gaining a shared understanding of ongoing parking needs and supply across the central city as it recovers. This information also enables the private sector to make informed decisions about their own parking provision and opportunities to be involved in the provision of private and public parking facilities. http://www.ccc.govt.nz/transport/improvements-and-planning/transport-planning/christchurch-central- parking-plan/ 56

Monitoring

The Council and CCDU are monitoring parking demand, supply and utilisation quarterly within the Central City. A parking dashboard has been prepared to summarise and monitor trends in parking, including private sector supply, so that we can respond in terms of temporary supply and understanding future parking need.

We have also engaged with stakeholders, particularly around the retail precinct, to understand what the parking needs are by Oct 2016, when much of the Retail Precinct will be open and government workers returned. Jointly with CCDU we have developed a contingency plan for the supply of Retail Precinct parking to address the forecast shortfall before Lichfield Street parking building is complete. Staff will continue to monitor the supply of parking, particularly to the Retail Precinct.

The amount of public on and off street parking currently within walking distance of the retail precinct is illustrated on the map below.

The forecast short stay parking supply and demand to 2019 within and around the retail precinct (this wider area is defined in the Christchurch Central Parking Plan), is shown in the graph below. The forecast includes both private and public off street supply but does not include on-street parking. Where supply does not meet demand within the Precinct, further supply can be found within 3 min walk (map above). 57

Parking buildings

The priority for the Council is to focus on the delivery of short stay (less than 3 hours) parking. This may be through the rebuild of Council owned parking buildings, and provision of other parking areas and / or by working with the private sector to deliver parking. As before the earthquakes, most parking supply is expected to be provided by the private sector, especially for long stay commuter parking. Council are monitoring resource consents and anchor projects to understand how much supply is expected to be provided. The map below identifies where off-street parking buildings are expected.

The Council released an EOI to the market on delivery options for Lichfield Street parking building and other off street public parking facilities in the central city parking, in March 2015. There was a good response to the EOI, and the Council is now moving forward with an RFP for the replacement of Lichfield Street. The replacement of Lichfield Street car park is seen as the highest priority to support the Retail Precinct. An RFP was released in late August for its replacement. The objective is to enable Council to select and appoint a contractor to provide a safe car park facility. This will include a minimum of 700 public spaces with mobility, cycle and motorcycle parking, parking technology and active commercial space provision on the ground floor. The demolition of the quake damaged Lichfield Street parking building is underway.

The replacement of the Crossing car park is under construction and is expected to be open by Oct 2016. 58 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 59 P u b l i c E x c l u d e d S e c t i o n 60 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 61

11 SEPTEMBER 2015

URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

RESOLUTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC

Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

I move that the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely item(s) 15.

Reason for passing this resolution: good reason to withhold exists under section 7. Specific grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution: Section 48(1)(a)

This resolution is made in reliance on Section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by Section 6 or Section 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as follows: 62 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE 63

ITEM GENERAL SUBJECT OF SUBCLAUSE & REASON UNDER ACT SECTION PLAIN ENGLISH REASON WHEN REPORT CAN BE NO. EACH MATTER TO BE RELEASED CONSIDERED

15. Review of the Land Use To protect information which is subject to an obligation of 7 (2) (c)(i) Information contained in the report After the Council meeting of Recovery Plan confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled has not yet been considered by a Environment Canterbury. to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the formal meeting of Environment making available of the information— Canterbury. (i) would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied

+. 64 65 GREATER CHRISTCHURCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

Chairperson’s Recommendation: That the foregoing motion be adopted.

Note

Section 48(4) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 provides as follows:

“(4) Every resolution to exclude the public shall be put at a time when the meeting is open to the public, and the text of that resolution (or copies thereof):

(a) Shall be available to any member of the public who is present; and (b) Shall form part of the minutes of the local authority.”