DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond the Landau Paradigm Beyond the Landau Paradigm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond the Landau Paradigm Beyond the Landau Paradigm Topological phase transitions Beyond the Landau paradigm Beyond the Landau paradigm Topological phase transitions " for topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter " Nobel Prize in Physics in 2016 Nobel Prize in Physics in 2016 " for topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter " David Thouless Michael Kosterlitz Duncan Haldane U. of Washington Brown U. Princeton U. Berezinskii - Kosterlitz - Thouless transition BKT transition Vadim Berezinskii Michael Kosterlitz David Thouless topological phase transitions BKT transition Vadim Berezinskii Michael Kosterlitz David Thouless topological phase transitions Berezinskii - Kosterlitz - Thouless transition topological phase transitions Berezinskii - Kosterlitz - Thouless transition BKT transition Vadim Berezinskii Michael Kosterlitz David Thouless Ising model; si = ±1; x y XY model; ~si = (si ; si ) = (cos θi ; sin θi ) P HIsing = −J si sj discrete sym. <i;j> P P HXY = −J ~si · ~sj = −J cos θi − θj continuous sym. <i;j> <i;j> Ising modeld ` = 1 XY modeld ` = 2 symmetry Ising modeld ` = 1 XY modeld ` = 2 symmetry Ising model; si = ±1; x y XY model; ~si = (si ; si ) = (cos θi ; sin θi ) P HIsing = −J si sj discrete sym. <i;j> P P HXY = −J ~si · ~sj = −J cos θi − θj continuous sym. <i;j> <i;j> symmetry Ising model; si = ±1; x y XY model; ~si = (si ; si ) = (cos θi ; sin θi ) P HIsing = −J si sj discrete sym. <i;j> P P HXY = −J ~si · ~sj = −J cos θi − θj continuous sym. <i;j> <i;j> Ising modeld ` = 1 XY modeld ` = 2 discrete symmetry d = 1: m(T ; 0) = 0 (T > 0) 8 < 0; T > Tc d ≥ 2: m(T ; 0) = : 6= 0; T < Tc Mermin - Wagner theorem ('66) d = 1; 2; m~ (T ; 0) = 0 (T > 0) 8 < 0; T > Tc d ≥ 3; m~ (T ; 0) = : 6= 0; T < Tc continuous symmetry continuous symmetry Mermin - Wagner theorem ('66) d = 1; 2; m~ (T ; 0) = 0 (T > 0) 8 < 0; T > Tc d ≥ 3; m~ (T ; 0) = : 6= 0; T < Tc no long-range order in two-dimensional XY- model no spontaneous symmetry breaking in two-dimensional XY- model no spontaneous symmetry breaking in two-dimensional XY- model no long-range order in two-dimensional XY- model discrete symmetry Ising model d > 1 Γ(r; T ; h = 0) = lim [ < s~r 0 s~r 0+~r > − < s~r 0 > < s~r 0+~r > ] 1 8 −r/ξ(T ) e ; T ! T <> r d−2+η c Γ(r; T ; h = 0) ∼ :> 1 ; T = T r d−2+η c correlation function Ising model d > 1 Γ(r; T ; h = 0) = lim [ < s~r 0 s~r 0+~r > − < s~r 0 > < s~r 0+~r > ] 1 8 −r/ξ(T ) e ; T ! T <> r d−2+η c Γ(r; T ; h = 0) ∼ :> 1 ; T = T r d−2+η c correlation function discrete symmetry Γ(r; T ; h = 0) = lim [ < s~r 0 s~r 0+~r > − < s~r 0 > < s~r 0+~r > ] 1 8 −r/ξ(T ) e ; T ! T <> r d−2+η c Γ(r; T ; h = 0) ∼ :> 1 ; T = T r d−2+η c correlation function discrete symmetry Ising model d > 1 correlation function discrete symmetry Ising model d > 1 Γ(r; T ; h = 0) = lim [ < s~r 0 s~r 0+~r > − < s~r 0 > < s~r 0+~r > ] 1 8 −r/ξ(T ) e ; T ! T <> r d−2+η c Γ(r; T ; h = 0) ∼ :> 1 ; T = T r d−2+η c continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation Z ( 1 2 + K 2 aτ + 2 A u 2 H [Φ ; Φt ] = G + d~r (rΦ ) + (Φ ) + eff ` 0 2 ` 2 ` 1 2 ) K 2 aτ + 6 A u 2 + (rΦt ) + (Φt ) 2 2 I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) - transverse fluctuation I Gaussian Heff [m~ ] I correlation functions: 0 00 0 00 Γ`;`(~r ; ~r ) = < Φ`(~r )Φ`(~r ) > 0 00 0 00 Γt;t (~r ; ~r ) = < Φt (~r )Φt (~r ) > K 1 2 I 2 = aτ + 2 A u ξ` K 1 2 2 = aτ + 6 A u ξt correlation functions continuous symmetry d > 2 m~ = m1 e~1 + m2 e~2 = A cos θ e~1 + A sin θ e~2 I state with spontaneously broken continuous symmetry: q 6ajτj A = A = u ; θ = θ = 0 =) m~ 0 = (m1;0; 0) = A e~1 I consider a small fluctuation around this state: m~ 0 −! m~ = A + Φ`(~r) e~1 + Φt (~r) e~2 I Φ`(~r) - longitudinal fluctuation, Φt (~r) -
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes on Statistical Field Theory
    Lecture Notes on Statistical Field Theory Kevin Zhou [email protected] These notes cover statistical field theory and the renormalization group. The primary sources were: • Kardar, Statistical Physics of Fields. A concise and logically tight presentation of the subject, with good problems. Possibly a bit too terse unless paired with the 8.334 video lectures. • David Tong's Statistical Field Theory lecture notes. A readable, easygoing introduction covering the core material of Kardar's book, written to seamlessly pair with a standard course in quantum field theory. • Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group. Covers similar material to Kardar's book with a conversational tone, focusing on the conceptual basis for phase transitions and motivation for the renormalization group. The notes are structured around the MIT course based on Kardar's textbook, and were revised to include material from Part III Statistical Field Theory as lectured in 2017. Sections containing this additional material are marked with stars. The most recent version is here; please report any errors found to [email protected]. 2 Contents Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Phonons...........................................3 1.2 Phase Transitions......................................6 1.3 Critical Behavior......................................8 2 Landau Theory 12 2.1 Landau{Ginzburg Hamiltonian.............................. 12 2.2 Mean Field Theory..................................... 13 2.3 Symmetry Breaking.................................... 16 3 Fluctuations 19 3.1 Scattering and Fluctuations................................ 19 3.2 Position Space Fluctuations................................ 20 3.3 Saddle Point Fluctuations................................. 23 3.4 ∗ Path Integral Methods.................................. 24 4 The Scaling Hypothesis 29 4.1 The Homogeneity Assumption............................... 29 4.2 Correlation Lengths.................................... 30 4.3 Renormalization Group (Conceptual)..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Mathematical Crystallisation May 2016 Organiser: Stefan Adams, Markus Heydenreich, Frank Den Hollander, Sabine Jansen
    Trends in mathematical crystallisation May 2016 Organiser: Stefan Adams, Markus Heydenreich, Frank den Hollander, Sabine Jansen Description and aim: The workshop concentrates on the mathematical theory of crystallisation. More precisely, we focus on five topics that are closely connected with crystallisation, and approach these topics from different mathematical angles. These five topics are: (1) Spatial symmetry breaking at positive temperature (2) Crystallisation and surface effects at zero temperature (3) Continuum particle systems (Gibbs point fields, metastability, and Percolation) (4) Elasticity (variational analysis & gradient fields and quasi-crystals and liquid crystals (5) Differential/integral geometry We expect participants from analysis, statistical physics and probability. Our primary goal is to discuss the different approaches towards crystallisation in these disciplines. Vision: Crystallisation is the (natural or artificial) process of formation of solid crystals precipitating from a solution, melt or more rarely deposited directly from a gas. Crystallisation is also a chemical solid-liquid separation technique, in which mass transfer of a solute from the liquid solution to a pure solid crystalline phase occurs. In chemical engineering crystallisation occurs in a crystalliser. Crystallisation is therefore an aspect of precipitation, obtained through a variation of the solubility conditions of the solute in the solvent, as compared to precipitation due to chemical reaction. Crystallisation poses major challenges for mathematicians - it is one of the challenging open interdisciplinary problems involving analysts, probabilists, applied mathematicians, physicists and material scientists. There are many open questions, among which are the following. Most of these have been discussed at the workshop 'Facets of mathematical crystallization' - Lorentz Center Leiden, September 2014. A key challenge of the workshop is to address and clarify their potential further.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosterlitz–Thouless Physics: a Review of Key Issues Accepted for Publication 7 October 2015 Published 28 January 2016
    Reports on Progress in Physics REVIEW Related content - Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition Kosterlitz–Thouless physics: a review of key and two-dimensional melting V N Ryzhov, E E Tareyeva, Yu D Fomin et issues al. - Depinning and nonequilibrium dynamic phases of particle assemblies driven over To cite this article: J Michael Kosterlitz 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 026001 random and ordered substrates: a review C Reichhardt and C J Olson Reichhardt - Quantum phase transitions Matthias Vojta View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Isolating long-wavelength fluctuation from structural relaxation in two-dimensional glass: cage-relative displacement Hayato Shiba et al - Disappearance of the Hexatic Phase in a Binary Mixture of Hard Disks John Russo and Nigel B. Wilding - Berezinskii—Kosterlitz—Thouless transition and two-dimensional melting Valentin N. Ryzhov et al This content was downloaded from IP address 128.227.24.141 on 25/02/2018 at 11:47 IOP Reports on Progress in Physics Reports on Progress in Physics Rep. Prog. Phys. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 026001 (59pp) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/2/026001 79 Review 2016 Kosterlitz–Thouless physics: a review of key © 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd issues RPPHAG J Michael Kosterlitz 026001 Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA J M Kosterlitz E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 June 2015, revised 5 October 2015 Kosterlitz–Thouless physics: a review of key issues Accepted for publication 7 October 2015 Published 28 January 2016 Printed in the UK Abstract This article reviews, from a very personal point of view, the origins and the early work on ROP transitions driven by topological defects such as vortices in the two dimensional planar rotor model and in 4Helium films and dislocations and disclinations in 2D crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1101.4337V2 [Cond-Mat.Stat-Mech] 18 Mar 2011 Havior in Agreement with the KTHNY Predictions
    Characterization of the Melting Transition in Two Dimensions at Vanishing External Pressure Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations Daniel Asenjo1;4, Fernando Lund1, Sim´onPoblete2, Rodrigo Soto1, and Marcos Sotomayor3 1Departamento de F´ısica and CIMAT, Facultad de Ciencias F´ısicas y Matem´aticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 2Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Neurobiology Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 4Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. A molecular dynamics study of a two dimensional system of particles interacting through a Lennard-Jones pairwise potential is performed at fixed temperature and vanishing external pressure. As the temperature is increased, a solid-to-liquid transition occurs. When the melting temperature Tc is approached from below, there is a proliferation of dislocation pairs and the elastic constant approaches the value predicted by the KTHNY theory. In addition, as Tc is approached from above, the relaxation time increases, consistent with an approach to criticality. However, simulations fail to produce a stable hexatic phase using systems with up to 90,000 particles. A significant jump in enthalpy at Tc is observed, consistent with either a first order or a continuous transition. The role of external pressure is discussed. I. INTRODUCTION On the numerical side, molecular dynamics and Monte- Carlo simulations19,20 of systems with a small number of particles (N) broadly detected a transition where the Melting of an infinite solid in two dimensions has number of dislocations proliferates, but failed to pro- been described as a process driven by a proliferation vide clear evidence for the nature of the observed tran- of thermally excited dislocation pairs in the Kosterlitz- sition.
    [Show full text]
  • Defects in Two Dimensional Colloidal Crystals
    Defects in Two Dimensional Colloidal Crystals by Lichao Yu B.Sc., University of Science and Technology of China; Hefei, China, 2010 M.Sc., Brown University; Providence, RI, 2013 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Physics at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND May 2015 c Copyright 2015 by Lichao Yu This dissertation by Lichao Yu is accepted in its present form by Department of Physics as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Xinsheng Sean Ling, Ph.D., Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date John Michael Kosterlitz, Ph.D., Reader Date Robert Pelcovits, Ph.D., Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii Vitae Lichao Yu was born in the city of Nanchang, Jiangxi, P. R. China, on July 12th 1990. He obtained his Bachelor of Science from University of Science and Technology of China in 2010, and a Master's degree in Physics from Brown University in 2013. iv Acknowledgements Time flies. Five years went really fast. I still have a vivid recollection of the day I stepped into the campus of Brown. It's sunny, warm breeze carasses my face. At that moment, I know I would, with no regret, spend the best five years of my life, here at Brown, dedicating to Physics research, the great journey of exploration. This is meant to be a wonderful experience throughout my life. First of all, I would like to give my thanks to my advisor Professor Xinsheng Sean Ling for his professional advice and guidance on research.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank's Constant in the Hexatic Phase
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E 75, 031402 ͑2007͒ Frank’s constant in the hexatic phase P. Keim,1 G. Maret,2 and H. H. von Grünberg1 1Universität Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria 2Universität Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany ͑Received 1 September 2006; revised manuscript received 25 January 2007; published 22 March 2007͒ Using videomicroscopy data of a two-dimensional colloidal system the bond-order correlation function G6 is ␰ calculated and used to determine both the orientational correlation length 6 in the liquid phase and the modulus of orientational stiffness, Frank’s constant FA, in the hexatic phase. The latter is an anisotropic fluid phase between the crystalline and the isotropic liquid phase. FA is found to be finite within the hexatic phase, takes the value 72/␲ at the hexatic↔isotropic liquid phase transition, and diverges at the hexatic↔crystal transition as predicted by the Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young theory. This is a quantitative test of the mechanism of breaking the orientational symmetry by disclination unbinding. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.031402 PACS number͑s͒: 82.70.Dd, 64.70.Dv, 68.35.Rh I. INTRODUCTION type. Defect dissociation is completed at a temperature where the thermally averaged pair distance The theory of melting in two dimensions ͑2D͒, developed ␤ ͐ 2 2 − Hd by Kosterlitz, Thouless, Halperin, Nelson, and Young 2 d rr e 2−cd 2 ͗r ͘ = ␤ = r ͑2͒ ͑KTHNY͒ has been a matter of debate over decades. In a 2D ͐ 2 − Hd c d re 4−cd crystal, the density-density correlation function is an algebra- → ically decaying function and is not given by a set of ␦ peaks diverges which is obviously the case if cd 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Existence of a Hexatic Phase in Porous Media
    VOLUME 89, NUMBER 7 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 12AUGUST 2002 Existence of a Hexatic Phase in Porous Media Ravi Radhakrishnan,1 Keith E. Gubbins,2 and Malgorzata Sliwinska-Bartkowiak3 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 66-021, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 2North Carolina State University, 113 Riddick Labs, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 3Institute of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan, Poland (Received 7 August 2000; revised manuscript received 17 April 2002; published 25 July 2002) Molecular simulations for simple fluids in narrow slit-shaped carbon pores exhibit crystal-hexatic and hexatic-liquid transitions that are consistent with Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young theory. The temperature range over which the hexatic phase is stable is dramatically widened under confinement. Remarkably, the transitions, which are continuous for a single adsorbed layer, become weakly first order when the pore can accommodate two molecular layers. Nonlinear dielectric effect measurements for CCl4 and aniline in activated carbon fibers (pore width 1.4 nm) show divergence at these transitions, confirming the hexatic phase. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.076101 PACS numbers: 68.35.Rh Two-dimensional systems have a special significance for ment of thermal equilibrium because of large particle sizes phase transitions in which continuous symmetry is broken compared to molecular dimensions. (such as freezing transitions). The Mermin-Wagner theo- Activated carbon fibers (ACF) possess microcrystallites rem states that true long-range order cannot exist in such made up of graphene sheets that tend to align in similar systems [1]. Nelson and Halperin [2] proposed the directions, with slit-shaped voids between the microcrys- KTHNY (Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young) tals.
    [Show full text]
  • Melting of Two-Dimensional Colloidal Crystals: a Simulation Study of The
    Melting of two-dimensional coliloidal crystals: A simulation study of the Yukawa system Kevin J. Naidoo and Jurgen Schnitker Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055 (Received 13 July 1993;accepted 3 November 1993) The two-dimensional melting transition of charged polystyrene spheres in aqueous colloidal suspensionhas been studied by molecular dynamics simulation of a screenedCoulomb system. Some central predictions of the Kosterhtz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young theory of defect-mediatedmelting are confirmed, such as an apparent divergenceof the correlation lengths for translational and bond-orientational order at different thermodynamic state points, but there are also predictions of the theory that are violated. The defect topology is very complex, with oscillation periods of the defect density of many million time steps duration. The need for extensive sampling and, to a lesser degree,the choice of potential function continue to be the crucial issuesfor any attempt to generatea hexatic structure by meansof computer simulation. 1. INTRODUCTlON KTHNY theory, no consensushas emergedconcerning its applicability to real systems.Nevertheless, it seemsthat at Monodispersecolloidal particles in aqueoussuspension least some experimental systems, such as certain smectic provide a model system of unique versatility for the study liquid crystals,lo have provided good indications in support of classical condensedphase phenomena. “’ Thus such sus- of the theory. Probably the most compelling evidence for pensionshave
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Dimensional Colloidal Systems in Time-Dependent Magnetic Fields
    Two-dimensional colloidal systems in time-dependent magnetic fields How to define crystallinity in 2D on a local scale Patrick Dillmann, Georg Maret, and Peter Keima Universit¨atKonstanz, Fachbereich Physik, 78467 Konstanz, Germany Abstract. We use super-paramagnetic colloidal particles confined by gravitation to a flat water-air interface as a model system to study the non-equilibrium liquid-solid phase transition in two dimensions. The system temperature is adjustable by changing the strength of an exter- nal magnetic field perpendicular to the water-air interface. Increasing the magnetic field on a timescale of milliseconds quenches the liquid to a strongly super-cooled state. If the system is cooled down out of equilib- rium the solidification differs drastically from the equilibrium melting and freezing scenario as no hexatic phase is observable. The system solidifies to a polycrystalline structure with many grains of different orientations. Since the local closed packed order in two dimensions is sixfold, in both the fluid and the crystalline state, sensitive measures have to be developed. In the present manuscript we compare different methods to identify crystalline cluster locally and motivate the thresh- old values. Those are chosen in comparison with the isotropic fluid on one hand and large mono-crystals in thermal equilibrium on the other hand. With the given criteria for crystalline cluster the cluster are found not to be circular and fractal dimensions of the grains are given. 1 Introduction Since the work of Peierls [1] and Mermin and Wagner [2,3] it is known that strictly speaking no crystals exist in systems with dimension d<3 at finite temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Melting of Polydisperse Hard Disks
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Disorder in entropic solids Pronk, S. Publication date 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Pronk, S. (2003). Disorder in entropic solids. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 7 Melting of Polydisperse Hard Disks In the 1930's, Landau and Peierls showed that two-dimensional solids are qual­ itatively different from their 3D counterpart, as they lack long-ranged positional order (see e.g. 40). However, 2D crystals do have long-ranged bond-orientational order and, in this respect, they differ form the isotropic liquid phase where both translational and bond-orientational order are short ranged. In the 1970's, Kosterlitz and Thouless suggested that the melting of two-dimen­ sional crystals may be quite different form 3D melting.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Work on Defect Driven Phase Transitions
    May 13, 2013 11:19 8572: 40 Years of BKT Theory chap1 Chapter 1 Early Work on Defect Driven Phase Transitions J. Michael Kosterlitz Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA David J. Thouless Department of Physics, Box 351560, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA This article summarizes the early history of the theory of phase transitions driven by topological defects, such as vortices in superfluid helium films or dislocations and disclinations in two-dimensional solids. We start with a review of our two earliest papers, pointing out their errors and omis- sions as well as their insights. We then describe the work, partly done by Kosterlitz but mostly done by other people, which corrected these over- sights, and applied these ideas to experimental systems, and to numerical and experimental simulations. by WSPC on 11/13/13. For personal use only. 1.1. Introduction The idea that certain phase transitions might be driven by the occurrence of an equilibrium concentration of defects such as dislocations in solids or 40 Years of Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless Theory Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com quantized vortices in superfluids is almost as old as the recognition that such defects have an important role in the mechanical or electrical prop- erties of such materials. Indeed, in Onsager’s incredibly brief initial note on the existence of quantized vortices in superfluid helium, the possibility of a vortex-driven transition from the superfluid phase to the normal fluid phase is mentioned,1 and this possibility was later presented by Feynman2 in a much more accessible form.
    [Show full text]
  • Phases of Active Matter in Two Dimensions
    Phases of active matter in two dimensions Leticia F. Cugliandolo Sorbonne Universit´e, Laboratoire de Physique Th´eoriqueet Hautes Energies, CNRS UMR 7589 Tour 13, 5`eme´etage,4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France Giuseppe Gonnella Universit`adegli Studi di Bari and INFN Sezione di Bari, Dipartimento di Fisica, via Amendola 173, I-70126 Bari, Italia arXiv:1810.11833v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 28 Oct 2018 iv 1 v Preface These notes focus on the description of the phases of matter in two dimensions. Firstly, we present a brief discussion of the phase diagrams of bidimensional interacting pas- sive systems, and their numerical and experimental measurements. The presentation will be short and schematic. We will complement these notes with a rather complete bibliography that should guide the students in their study of the development of this very rich subject over the last century. Secondly, we summarise very recent results on the phase diagrams of active Brownian disks and active dumbbell systems in two dimensions. The idea is to identify all the phases and to relate, when this is possible, the ones found in the passive limit with the ones observed at large values of the ac- tivity, at high and low densities, and for both types of constituents. Proposals for the mechanisms leading to these phases will be discussed. The physics of bidimensional active systems open many questions, some of which will be listed by the end of the Chapter. Acknowledgements We want to warmly thank our collaborators on studies of active matter; in alphabeti- cal order Mathias Casiulis, Olivier Dauchot, Pasquale Digregorio, Gianluca Laghezza, Antonio Lamura, Demian Levis, Davide Loi, Davide Marenduzzo, Alessandro Mossa, Stefano Mossa, Ignacio Pagonabarraga, Isabella Petrelli, Antonio Suma, and Marco Tarzia, from whom we learnt most of what we present in these notes.
    [Show full text]