DOCSLIB.ORG

XB-91-016.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
XB-91-016.Pdf What Is To Be Done? Proposals for the Soviet Transition to the Market Merton J. Peck and Thomas J. Richardson Editors With Contributions by Wil Albeda Petr 0. Aven Richard N. Cooper Alfred E. Kahn William D. Nordhaus Kimio Uno Foreword by Stanislav S. Shatalin An IIASA Study Yale University Press New Haven and London Copyright © 1991 by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Baskerville type by The Composing Room of Michigan, Inc., Grand Rapids, Michigan. Printed in the United States of America by Vail-Ballou Press, Binghamton, New York. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data What is to be done? : proposals for the Soviet transition to the market / Merton j. Peck and Thomas j. Richardson, editors; foreword by Stanislav S. Shatalin. p. cm. "An IIASA study." Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-300-05466-1 (cloth). - ISBN 0-300-05468-8 (paper) I. Soviet Union-Economic policy-1986- 2. Economic stabilization-Soviet Union. 3. Privatization-Soviet Union. I. Peck, Merton j. II. Richardson, Thomas j., 1958­ III. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. HC336.26.W43 1992 338.947-dc20 91-30064 CIP The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Contents List of Tables VII Foreword by Stanislav S. Shatalin IX Acknowledgments Xl List of Contributors Xlii About the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis XVII Chapter One Introduction 1 Merton J. Peck Chapter Two The Soviet Economic Crisis: Steps to Avert Collapse 19 The Chairmen of the Study Groups and Others Chapter Three Price Deregulation, Corporatization, and Competition 38 Alfred E. Kahn and Merton J. Peck Chapter Four Stabilizing the Soviet Economy 83 William D. Nordhaus Chapter Five Opening the Soviet Economy 116 Richard N. Cooper Chapter Six Moderating the Social Costs of Unemployment 133 Wil Albeda Chapter Seven Privatization and the Creation of a Commercial Banking System 149 Kimio Uno vi Contents Appendix A Economic Policy and the Reforms of Mikhail Gorbachev: A Short History 179 Petr O. Aven Appendix B Participants in the Economic Reform and Integration Conference at Sopron, Hungary, July-August 1990 207 Index 213 Tables 3.1 Ratio of input costs to producers' price for selected consumer goods, 1989 3.2 Distribution of Soviet manufacturing product groups according to the share of the largest producer in total output, 1988 3.3 Distribution of concentration ratios: Soviet product groups and U.S. 4-digit manufacturing industries 4.1 Growth in national output in the Soviet Union: (a) historical data; (b) recent data 4.2 USSR: incomes and prices 4.3 USSR: money and credit 5.1 USSR: domestic and world energy prices 5.2 Hourly compensation in manufacturing 5.3 USSR: external debt and reserves 6.1 Estimates of unemployment with varying transitions to a market economy 7.1 Size distribution of industrial enterprises in the Soviet Union 7.2 Size of state retail shops 7.3 Consolidated balance sheet of the present Soviet banking system, December 1990 7.4 Balance sheet of the central bank in the two-tier banking system 7.5 Balance sheet of commercial banks in the two-tier banking system 7.6 Comparison of the proposals made in this chapter with those of the new Soviet banking legislation A.l Soviet annual growth rates A.2 Excess equipment in inventories at beginning of year A.3 Distribution of profits of state enterprises A.4 Decentralization of capital investment in the state sector A.5 Growth of wages and personal incomes A.6 Growth rates of selected indicators, official data Foreword I am pleased to add a brief foreword to this book, for it represents the culmination of a project that I initiated in the fall of 1989. My view was, and continues to be, that Western economists could con­ tribute to formulating plans for the very difficult transition of the Soviet economy to a market system. I further thought that the Inter­ national Institute for Applied Systems Analysis would be the best forum for providing such assistance. The record of the last eighteen months has vindicated my views. This Institute was able to attract distinguished Western economists to study and to write about the problems of the transition. During several conferences, they engaged in a true dialogue with my Soviet colleagues that we found very helpful. In their preliminary reports presented in the summer of 1990, these Western economists pro­ vided valuable materials for the report of the Working Group formed by thejoint decision of M. S. Gorbachev and B. N. Yeltsin. I was the head of the task force that wrote the report, also known as the Five-Hundred-Day Plan. This book is the final report of the Western economists who were enlisted in this project by the Institute. It offers the best analysis by Western economists of the problems of economic reform in the Soviet Union, and it presents proposals that would create an effec­ tive market system for our economy. This book, written in a lively style, is a major contribution to the scholarly literature concerning the transition of centrally planned economies to a market system. Economists, policy makers, journal­ ists, and all those who are concerned with how the largest European nation can share in and contribute to world prosperity should read it. I highly recommend it. Stanislav S. Shatalin ix Acknowledgments This book is a product of the Economic Reform and Integration Project at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) rather than the work ofa single scholar. A large number of individuals contributed to the project. We are pleased to recognize them here. As the introduction explains, the project owes its inception to the vision of Academician Stanislav Shatalin, who saw the need for an analysis of Soviet economic reform by Western economists. He launched the project and has been its steadfast supporter through­ out. Professor Evgenii Yasin, department chief of the USSR State Commission on Economic Reform, has worked closely with us in planning our work. He attended all ofour conferences. Petr Aven served as project coordinator with the responsibility for organizing the work ofSoviet experts for the project and undertak­ ing the coordination with the USSR State Commission. To both the authors and editors he made available his great knowledge of the economic institutions of the Soviet Union and of the previous re­ form efforts. His contributions enabled us to make our work more realistic and to reflect better the current situation in the Soviet Union. IIASA directors Robert Pry and Peter de Janosi fully supported this unique project and provided valued advice. Professor Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek, leader of IIASA's Technology, Economy, and So­ ciety Program, ofwhich this project was initially a part, taught us the mysteries ofplanning international conferences and gave us counsel on the substance ofthe project. Considerable help was given to us by IIASA staff members Janos Gacs, Shari Jandl, Gabrielle Schibich, Christoph Schneider, and Sabine Malek. Eryl Madel and Robert Duis of the IIASA Publications Department helped prepare the final manuscript. Much of the editing was done in New Haven, Connecticut. Roberta Dulong typed successive drafts ofmany ofthe chapters with dispatch. Yale students Tyrone Agar and Carolyn Kalhorn were able research assistants. Martha Ullberg typed the drafts of chapter 3. xi xii Acknowledgmenls As the introduction indicates, the main outlines ofthe ideas in this volume were developed at a conference in Sopron, Hungary, inJuly and August of 1990. About fifty economists from East and West were willing to interrupt their busy schedules and family vacations to contribute their knowledge to our discussions of economic reform. They are identified in Appendix B. We pay particular tribute to the five study group chairmen: Wil Albeda, Richard N. Cooper, Alfred E. Kahn, William D. Nordhaus, and Kimio Uno, who wrote the various memoranda that form the chapters of this book. This was truly a labor of love and one that made this book possible. Financial support for the project was provided by the USSR State Commission on Economic Reform, the Ford Foundation, the Pew Charitable Trusts, theJapan Foundation, the Sasakawa Foundation, and IIASA. Ofcourse, these organizations and the individuals who have helped us are not responsible for the views expressed here, which are solely those of the authors. The editors thank all those who have made our work possible. Merton J. Peck and Thomas J. Richardson Contributors Wil Albeda is the Belle van Zuylen Professor of Social Economic Policy at Utrecht University (Utrecht, Netherlands) and a part-time professorofeconomics at the University ofLimburg, Maastricht. He studied economics at the University ofRotterdam. Professor Albeda has written on economics, social policy, and labor relations; his most recent book was Neocorporatism. He also participated in a study on tripartism sponsored by the International Labour Organisation, for which he wrote the section on the Netherlands. Professor Albeda was minister of labor for the Netherlands from 1977 to 1981, and chairman ofthe Scientific Council for Government Policy from 1985 to 1990. He is currently chairman ofthe Public Service Advisory and Arbitration Committee in the Netherlands. Petr 0. Aven is a research scholar at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Laxenburg, Austria). He received his M.S. and his Ph.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Russian Revolutions: the Impact and Limitations of Western Influence
    Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Faculty and Staff Publications By Year Faculty and Staff Publications 2003 The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence Karl D. Qualls Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Qualls, Karl D., "The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence" (2003). Dickinson College Faculty Publications. Paper 8. https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications/8 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Karl D. Qualls The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence After the collapse of the Soviet Union, historians have again turned their attention to the birth of the first Communist state in hopes of understanding the place of the Soviet period in the longer sweep of Russian history. Was the USSR an aberration from or a consequence of Russian culture? Did the Soviet Union represent a retreat from westernizing trends in Russian history, or was the Bolshevik revolution a product of westernization? These are vexing questions that generate a great deal of debate. Some have argued that in the late nineteenth century Russia was developing a middle class, representative institutions, and an industrial economy that, while although not as advanced as those in Western Europe, were indications of potential movement in the direction of more open government, rule of law, free market capitalism. Only the Bolsheviks, influenced by an ideology imported, paradoxically, from the West, interrupted this path of Russian political and economic westernization.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems
    Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Prof. Paczkowski Rutgers University Fall, 2007 Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 1 / 87 Part I Assignments Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 2 / 87 Assignments W. Baumol, et al. Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism Available at http://www.yalepresswiki.org/ Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 3 / 87 Assignments Research and learn as much as you can about the following: Real GDP Human Development Index Gini Coefficient Corruption Index World Population Growth Human Poverty Index Quality of Life Index Reporters without Borders Be prepared for a second Group Teach on these after the midterm: October 24 Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 4 / 87 Part II Introduction Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 5 / 87 Comparing Economic Systems How do we compare economic systems? We previously noted the many qualitative ways of comparing economic systems { organization, incentives, etc What about the quantitative? Potential quantitative measures might include Real GDP level and growth Population level and growth Income and wealth distribution Major financial and industrial statistics Indexes of freedom and corruption These measures should tell a story The story is one of economic performance Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 6 / 87 Comparing Economic Systems (Continued) Economic performance is multifaceted Judging how an economic system performs, we can look at broad topics or issues such as..
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation
    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R
    STUDIA FORESTALIA SUECICA NR 39 1966 Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. An Analysis of Soviet Competitive Potentialities Skogsekonomi i Sovjet~rnionen rned en unalys av landets potentiella konkurrenskraft by KARL VIICTOR ALGTTERE SICOGSH~GSICOLAN ROYAL COLLEGE OF FORESTRY STOCKHOLM Lord Keynes on the role of the economist: "He must study the present in the light of the past for the purpose of the future." Printed in Sweden by ESSELTE AB STOCKHOLM Foreword Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. is a special study of the forestry sector of the Soviet economy. As such it makes a further contribution to the studies undertaken in recent years to elucidate the means and ends in Soviet planning; also it attempts to assess the competitive potentialities of the U.S.S.R. in international trade. Soviet studies now command a very great interest and are being undertaken at some twenty universities and research institutes mainly in the United States, the United Kingdoin and the German Federal Republic. However, it would seem that the study of the development of the forestry sector has riot received the detailed attention given to other fields. In any case, there have not been any analytical studies published to date elucidating fully the connection between forestry and the forest industries and the integration of both in the economy as a whole. Studies of specific sections have appeared from time to time, but I have no knowledge of any previous study which gives a complete picture of the Soviet forest economy and which could faci- litate the marketing policies of the western world, being undertaken at any university or college.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Intelligence in a Command Economy
    Counter-Intelligence in a Command Economy Mark Harrison* Department of Economics and CAGE, University of Warwick Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Birmingham Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Stanford University Inga Zaksauskienė** Faculty of History, Vilnius University Abstract We provide the first thick description of the counter-intelligence function in a command economy of the Soviet type. Based on documentation from Soviet Lithuania, the paper considers the KGB (secret police) as a market regulator, commissioned to prevent the disclosure of secret government business and forestall the disruption of government plans. Where market regulation in open societies is commonly intended to improve market transparency, competition, and fair treatment of consumers and employees, KGB regulation was designed to enforce secrecy, monopoly, and discrimination. One consequence of KGB regulation of the labour market may have been adverse selection for talent. We argue that the Soviet economy was designed to minimize the costs. Keywords: communism, command economy, discrimination, information, loyalty, regulation, security, surveillance, Soviet Union. JEL Codes: N44, P21. * Mail: Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]. ** Mail: Universiteto g. 7, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania. Email: [email protected]. First draft: 26 April 2013. This version: 11 December 2014. Counter-Intelligence in a Command Economy Data Appendix Table
    [Show full text]
  • De Liberale Opmars
    ANDRÉ VERMEULEN Boom DE LIBERALE OPMARS André Vermeulen DE LIBERALE OPMARS 65 jaar v v d in de Tweede Kamer Boom Amsterdam De uitgever heeft getracht alle rechthebbenden van de illustraties te ach­ terhalen. Mocht u desondanks menen dat uw rechten niet zijn gehonoreerd, dan kunt u contact opnemen met Uitgeverij Boom. Behoudens de in of krachtens de Auteurswet van 1912 gestelde uitzonde­ ringen mag niets uit deze uitgave worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch door fotokopieën, opnamen of enig andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever. No part ofthis book may be reproduced in any way whatsoever without the writtetj permission of the publisher. © 2013 André Vermeulen Omslag: Robin Stam Binnenwerk: Zeno isbn 978 90 895 3264 o nur 680 www. uitgeverij boom .nl INHOUD Vooraf 7 Het begin: 1948-1963 9 2 Groei en bloei: 1963-1982 55 3 Trammelant en terugval: 1982-1990 139 4 De gouden jaren: 1990-2002 209 5 Met vallen en opstaan terug naar de top: 2002-2013 De fractievoorzitters 319 Gesproken bronnen 321 Geraadpleegde literatuur 325 Namenregister 327 VOORAF e meeste mensen vinden politiek saai. De geschiedenis van een politieke partij moet dan wel helemaal slaapverwekkend zijn. Wie de politiek een beetje volgt, weet wel beter. Toch zijn veel boeken die politiek als onderwerp hebben inderdaad saai om te lezen. Uitgangspunt bij het boek dat u nu in handen hebt, was om de geschiedenis van de WD-fractie in de Tweede Kamer zodanig op te schrijven, dat het trekjes van een politieke thriller krijgt.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetenschappelljke Raad Voor Het Regerlngsbeleld
    Wetenschappelljke Raad voor het Regerlngsbeleld W53 The Future of Industrial Relations in Europe Conference Documents WJ. Dercksen (ed.) Exemplaren van deze uitgave zljn te bestellen bij het Dlstrlbutlecentrum OverheMspubllkatles, Postbus 20014, 2500 EA 's-Gmvenhage, door wennakfng van f 10,- op glro 751 dan we1 schriftelljk of telefonisch (070-3789880) onder vennelding van titel en ISBN-nummer en het aantal gewenste exemplaren. This Working Document can be ordered at 'Dlstrlbutlecentrum Overheidspublikaties', P.O. Box 20014, 2500 EA The Hague, by paying f 10,- on giro 751 or by letter or telephone (0703789880) in mentioning title and ISBN-number and the number of copies you want to have. ISBN 90 346 2421 8 Publikatle van de Wetenschappelljke Raad voor het RegerlngsbeleM (WRR), Postbus 20004, 2500 EA 's-Gravenhage (tel. 0704564600). (Publication of the Scientific Council for Government Policy). CONTENTS Introduction by W.J. Dercksen I THE SWEDISH MODEL 1. M. Bruyn-Hundt, The Swedish model for woman's economic independence 2. L. Delsen and T. van Veen, The Swedish model: partially relevant for other European countries II TRllATERALlSM IN EUROPE 3. H. Slomp, The future of tripartism in Europe 4. J. Goetschy-Hingel, 1992 and the social dimension 5. D. Corbey, European integration and the survival of triiateralism 6. A. Steen, The new Europe; boundless liberalism against cross-national trade union solidarity 111 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 7. C.J. Lwnstra and T.J.J.B. Wotters, Conflict management and comparative industrial relations: towards a unrfying research strategy 8. H.W.J. Moerel, L Douwes Dekker, T. Akkermans, The system of industrial relations in South Africa, Hungary and the Netherlands 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monetary Legacy of the Soviet Union / Patrick Conway
    ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL FINANCE are published by the International Finance Section of the Department of Economics of Princeton University. The Section sponsors this series of publications, but the opinions expressed are those of the authors. The Section welcomes the submission of manuscripts for publication in this and its other series. Please see the Notice to Contributors at the back of this Essay. The author of this Essay, Patrick Conway, is Professor of Economics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He has written extensively on the subject of structural adjustment in developing and transitional economies, beginning with Economic Shocks and Structural Adjustment: Turkey after 1973 (1987) and continuing, most recently, with “An Atheoretic Evaluation of Success in Structural Adjustment” (1994a). Professor Conway has considerable experience with the economies of the former Soviet Union and has made research visits to each of the republics discussed in this Essay. PETER B. KENEN, Director International Finance Section INTERNATIONAL FINANCE SECTION EDITORIAL STAFF Peter B. Kenen, Director Margaret B. Riccardi, Editor Lillian Spais, Editorial Aide Lalitha H. Chandra, Subscriptions and Orders Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conway, Patrick J. Currency proliferation: the monetary legacy of the Soviet Union / Patrick Conway. p. cm. — (Essays in international finance, ISSN 0071-142X ; no. 197) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88165-104-4 (pbk.) : $8.00 1. Currency question—Former Soviet republics. 2. Monetary policy—Former Soviet republics. 3. Finance—Former Soviet republics. I. Title. II. Series. HG136.P7 no. 197 [HG1075] 332′.042 s—dc20 [332.4′947] 95-18713 CIP Copyright © 1995 by International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Economic History and Statistics
    Soviet Economic History and Statistics 1) Economic system in Russian agriculture after 1861 2) Revolution of 1905-07, 1917, War Communism, New Economic Policy 3) Industrialization Debate and How the Command Economy Emerged 4) Soviet Statistics 5) Was the Transition to the Command Economy Inevitable? Transitions from ME to CPE and back • 1918-20 - War Communism (directive planning) • 1921-29 - NEP market economy • 1929-91 – Command Economy • 1992-onwards - Market Economy Land system after Emancipation Act of 1861 • Land was divided in two parts - about half remained the property of the landlords, the rest was given to the peasants (6-12 hectares plots). The government bought out land from the landlords, so the peasants were indebted to the government • Heavy burden of redemption payments (abolished after 1905-07 revolution) • Inequality in land distribution • Agricultural commune (communal land tenure) was an obstacle for economic growth - egalitarian institution (taxes, redemption payments, communal works were the responsibility of the commune) - dismantled in 1906 by Stolypin’s decree Stolypin reforms of 1906 • Dissolution of the community – mir –obschina. Peasants got the right to leave the community - khutor and otrub peasants households • Mortgages for peasants to buy out land from the landlords • Migration to new territories Lenin's article “The Last Valve”: elimination of the commune is the last valve that could be opened in the overheating steam machine of the tsarist regime without liquidating large land ownership. No more valves
    [Show full text]
  • From Socialism to Market Economy: the Transition Problem
    Upjohn Press Upjohn Research home page 1-1-1992 From Socialism to Market Economy: The Transition Problem William S. Kern Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://research.upjohn.org/up_press Part of the International Economics Commons Citation Kern, William S., ed. 1992. From Socialism to Market Economy: The Transition Problem. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880995641 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This title is brought to you by the Upjohn Institute. For more information, please contact [email protected]. C/5"T1 ^ut^r :Svv=a J^F>?MS 1^1^ ^^PSg-pwpt^lMl^S^^I5*! B-ft) From SOCIALISM to MARKET ECONOMY The Transition Problem William S. Kern, Editor 1992 W.E. UPJOHN INSTITUTE for Employment Research Kalamazoo, Michigan Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data From socialism to market economy: the transition problem / William S. Kern, editor, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88099-129-1 (hard). — ISBN 0-88099-130-5 (pbk.) 1. Soviet Union—Economic policy—1986-1991—Congresses. 2. Post- communism—Soviet Union—Congresses. 3. Europe, Eastern—Economic policy—1989—Congresses. 4. Post-communism—Europe, Eastern— Congresses. I. Kern, William S., 1952- HC336.26.F77 1992 338.947—dc2 92-26336 CIP Copyright © 1992 WE. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 300 S. Westnedge Avenue Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007 THE INSTITUTE, a nonprofit research organization, was established on July 1, 1945. It is an activity of the W.E. Upjohn Unemployment Trustee Corporation, which was formed in 1932 to administer a fund set aside by the late Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • KGB Boss Says Robert Maxwell Was the Second Kissinger
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 21, Number 32, August 12, 1994 boss says Robert axwe KGB M ll was the second Kissinger by Mark Burdman On the evening of July 28, Germany's ARD television net­ Margaret Thatcher, who was frantically trying to prevent work broadcast an extraordinary documentary on the life German reunification. and death of the late Robert Maxwell, the British publishing Stanislav Sorokin was one of several top-level former magnate and sleazy wheeler-and-dealer who died under mys­ Soviet intelligence and political insiders who freely com­ terious circumstances, his body found floating in the waters mented on Maxwell during the broadcast. For their own rea­ off Tenerife in the Canary Islands, on Nov. 5, 1991. The sons, these Russians are evidently intent on provoking an show, "Man Overboard," was co-produced by the firm Mit­ international discussion of, and investigation into, the mys­ teldeutscher Rundfunk, headquartered in Leipzig in eastern teries of capital flight operations out of the U.S.S.R. in the Germany, and Austria's Oesterreicher Rundfunk. It relied late 1980s-early 1990s. Former Soviet KGB chief Vladimir primarily on interviews with senior officials of the former Kryuchkov, a partner of Maxwell in numerous underhanded Soviet KGB and GRU intelligence services, who helped ventures who went to jail for his role in the failed August build the case that the circumstances of Maxwell's death 1991 putsch against Gorbachov, suggests in the concluding must have been intimately linked to efforts to cover up sensi­ moments of the broadcast, that f'the English-American [sic] tive Soviet Communist Party capital flightand capital transfer secret services, who are experienced enough, could, if they to the West in the last days of the U.S.S.R.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Intro.Indd
    AUGUST 1991 Introduction: Coup de Grâce? Ann E. Robertson The collapse of the Soviet N August 4, 1991, Soviet president Mikhail Gor- Obachev left for the Crimea, to relax at his newly con- Union was the product of a structed dacha in Foros. Russian president Boris Yeltsin retired to his dacha, a two-story building outside Moscow. multifaceted struggle for power Both leaders planned to return to work by August 20 to between the center (Moscow) sign a controversial new Union treaty. At the same time, opponents of the treaty were meet- and the extensive periphery. ing in secret near Moscow, debating whether to pre-empt the ceremony. These men held high-ranking positions in The August putsch was the all-Union institutions, such as the military, police, and critical tipping point at which intelligence services, and their power bases would be drastically reduced under the new confederal union. With the advantage shifted from the August 20 deadline looming, they resolved to seize power, overthrow Gorbachev, and preserve the Soviet Gorbachev to Yeltsin. Union. They failed on all counts. After the attempted coup failed, the editors of Problems of Communism solicited contributions for a special issue focusing on the August events. Starting from the assump- tion that “the swift, bloodless collapse of this abortive ‘state of emergency’ accelerated the very processes that the plotters hoped to block or reverse and effectively administered the coup de grâce to seven decades of Bol- shevik rule,”1 seven noted scholars were asked to analyze the August events and “reflect on the political, economic, social, and foreign policy ramifications of the disintegra- tion of the Soviet Union.”2 Their studies covered events through mid-October, when the November/December 1991 issue went to press.
    [Show full text]