DOCSLIB.ORG

Patterns of Economic Development Under Socialism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : PATTERNS OF ECONOMI C DEVELOPMENT UNDE R SOCIALIS M AUTHOR : Professor Marvin R . Jackso n Department of Economic s Arizona State Universit y CONTRACTOR : Arizona State Universit y PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Professor Marvin R . Jackso n COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 800-1 2 DATE : April 198 9 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A . Introductio n The research in this project has sought answers to three questions : 1) In the time period 1950 to 1985, have patterns of economic developmen t in the communist-ruled countries of Eastern Europe differed from those i n capitalist countries ? 2) Have the patterns of two less developed communist-ruled countries , Bulgaria and Romania, differed from the common experience of that group ? 3) Have Bulgaria and Romania exhibited any significant variations tha t might suggest the limits to policy under the common institutiona l framework of communist political arrangements and socialist economi c institutions ? The research findings are compiled in a 400 page manuscript now bein g edited for publication . This final report includes the introductory chapte r and summaries of the nine substantive chapters of the manuscript . The chapte r titles are : II. Bulgaria and Romania : Past and Politics . III. Growth Patterns of National Product . IV. The Sources of Growth . V. Investments and Capital Accumulation . VI. Labor Force and Consumption . VII. Industrialization Patterns . VIII. The Contributions of Agriculture . IX. Foreign Trade and The CMEA . X. Challenges of World Markets . B . Some Concepts and Theory . The designation, "communist-ruled countries" has been chosen in place o f "socialist countries" because it is really communist rule that determines an d restricts choices of institutions and policy . What is more important is tha t the inquiry, mostly concerned with facts and their meanings, be directe d according to the existing body of theoretical-conceptual literature on th e expected economic effects of communist rule . These are discussed in Chapter I (enclosed) and again at the beginning of each chapter of the report . There is also a question of whether there are theoretical grounds fo r expecting the impact of communist rule to be different in Bulgaria and Romania , proxies for less developed countries . As will be explained shortly, being mor e or less developed has an impact on the development process which is independen t of institutional arrangements . Are there effects dependent on communist rule ? This question and a related one, are there conceptual or theoretica l grounds for expecting a different impact of communist rule on two seemingl y iii similar countries like Bulgaria and Romania, are discussed in Chapter II . The term, "development pattern", means the characteristics of economi c growth, including its sources and sectoral composition, and the main structura l changes taking place in a national economy over a period of time . If develop- ment patterns are representative of economic systems, they must be measured o n the basis of sufficient samples . In the project, the capitalist countries ar e usually taken to be the members of OECD, plus some East Asian and Latin American developing countries . At times the sample shrinks to the Wester n European and even only the Southern European countries . The sample for the communist-ruled countries nearly always includes th e six East European members of CMEA, often also the Soviet Union, and less ofte n Yugoslavia . A major research problem is how to decide if development patterns ar e "different" . Differences are sometimes presented as arithmetic averages acros s sample countries in each group . However, as often as has been possible , statistical tests are used to address the problem that nearly every importan t development pattern varies systematically with the level of GNP per capita an d sometimes with other factors such as country size (in the case of foreig n trade) . For example, growth rates of GNP tend to decline as the level of GN P per capita rises . So it would be biased to conclude that communist-rule d countries tend to grow faster merely on the grounds that average growth i s higher than for capitalist countries . Whenever possible the research employs a statistical regression t o "normalize" data for differences in the level of GNP before drawing conclusion s about system differences . This involves estimating an equation of the for m INDICATORi = an + b n* YCAP i + c n* POP i + d n* DUM j + e n , where INDICATOR is the nth pattern, a growth rate or a structural statistic , for the ith country, YCAP is national product per capita, POP is country siz e in terms of population, DUM is a dummy variable for the jth system or countr y group, and e is an error term . Differences in systems or country groups ar e estimated by the value and significance of the coefficient, d . A major part of the project is devoted to collection of a data set t o test differences . Data cover about 40 countries and more than 30 variables fo r the period from 1950 to 1985 . In order to manipulate data more easily, the y have been reduced to average values for five year periods (1950 to 1955, 195 5 to 1960, etc) . The usual sample set for testing differences between communist - ruled and capitalist countries is 256 observations . This sample is sometime s used to test differences between Bulgaria and Romania, and the other communist - ruled countries . When data unique to communist-ruled countries is used, test s are made with a 50 observation sample only for the communist-ruled countries . Comparisons of growth rates involving communist-ruled and capitalis t countries are always based on western estimates of GNP, industrial output, an d iv agricultural output for the former countries and official statistics for th e latter . When Bulgaria and Romania are compared with other communist-rule d countries, primary use is made of official statistics of net material produc t (NMP), gross industrial output (GIO), and gross agricultural output (GAO) . Some comparisons are also made with western estimates, and are always s o designated . C . Principal Finding s Summary Table 1 provides an overview of the main quantitative evidenc e generated and explored in the research . The major finding is that from 1950 t o 1985 communist-ruled countries grew less rapidly than capitalist countries a t any given level of income, a result attibutable to a combination of lowe r growth of productivity, labor force, and investment) This was despite greate r shifts of labor out of agriculture and higher rates of investment, highe r participation rates, and higher education rates . There was no difference i n growth rates of exports and imports . A second major finding is that communist-ruled countries have been "over - industrialized" . Shares of investment and labor force in industry, particu- larly heavy branches, have been larger than for a typical capitalist country a t the same level of income, while shares in services have been smaller . Other major findings concern the comparison of Bulgaria and Romania wit h the other communist-ruled countries . Bulgaria and Romania grew faster at a given level of income per capita than the others, exhibiting higher growth o f productivity, investments, exports and imports (but not labor force), an d greater shift of labor out of agriculture . 2 At the same time, neither in- dustrial output nor agricultural output grew faster in Bulgaria and Romani a than in the other countries . This suggests that the faster growth in Bulgaria and Romania was derived from the effects of shifting resources from agricultur e to industry (and perhaps was connected to relative pricing in the two sectors) . A second major finding in the case of Bulgaria and Romania is that mos t of their margin of faster growth compared to the other communist-ruled coun- tries was generated in the earlier years of communist rule . In 1976-80 and 1981-85 their behavior is more typical . This is consistent with the view tha t higher performance is connected to the (diminishing) possibilities of shiftin g resources from agriculture to industry . Many other minor findings and numerous qualifications in the methods, th e data, and the results are reported below . 1 This conclusion is based on western estimates of GNP for communist-rule d countries and corrected growth rates of investment, as explained in the body o f the report . 2Similar results are obtained when growth is measured in both GNP and NMP . Bulgarian and Romanian data in the two cases show no unusual deviations unti l the 1980s in the case of Romania . v Summary Table 1 DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH AND STRUCTURE : COMMUNIST-RULED VS CAPITALIST COUNTRIES AN D BULGARIA/ROMANIA VS OTHER COMMUNIST-RULED COUNTRIE S ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Communist - Ruled Bulgaria/Romani a Period versus versus Com - or Year Capitalist Growth or Development Pattern munist-Rule d ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 1950-85 lower 1) Growth of gross national product highe r 1950-79 same la) Stability of GNP 1950-79 same lb) Retardation of growt h 1950-85 lower 2) Growth of productivity (GNP) higher - converged * 1950-85 3) Growth of net material product highe
Recommended publications
  • Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems

    Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems

    Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Prof. Paczkowski Rutgers University Fall, 2007 Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 1 / 87 Part I Assignments Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 2 / 87 Assignments W. Baumol, et al. Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism Available at http://www.yalepresswiki.org/ Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 3 / 87 Assignments Research and learn as much as you can about the following: Real GDP Human Development Index Gini Coefficient Corruption Index World Population Growth Human Poverty Index Quality of Life Index Reporters without Borders Be prepared for a second Group Teach on these after the midterm: October 24 Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 4 / 87 Part II Introduction Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 5 / 87 Comparing Economic Systems How do we compare economic systems? We previously noted the many qualitative ways of comparing economic systems { organization, incentives, etc What about the quantitative? Potential quantitative measures might include Real GDP level and growth Population level and growth Income and wealth distribution Major financial and industrial statistics Indexes of freedom and corruption These measures should tell a story The story is one of economic performance Prof. Paczkowski (Rutgers University) Lecture 3: Quantitative Comparisons of Economic Systems Fall, 2007 6 / 87 Comparing Economic Systems (Continued) Economic performance is multifaceted Judging how an economic system performs, we can look at broad topics or issues such as..
  • Soviet Economic History and Statistics

    Soviet Economic History and Statistics

    Soviet Economic History and Statistics 1) Economic system in Russian agriculture after 1861 2) Revolution of 1905-07, 1917, War Communism, New Economic Policy 3) Industrialization Debate and How the Command Economy Emerged 4) Soviet Statistics 5) Was the Transition to the Command Economy Inevitable? Transitions from ME to CPE and back • 1918-20 - War Communism (directive planning) • 1921-29 - NEP market economy • 1929-91 – Command Economy • 1992-onwards - Market Economy Land system after Emancipation Act of 1861 • Land was divided in two parts - about half remained the property of the landlords, the rest was given to the peasants (6-12 hectares plots). The government bought out land from the landlords, so the peasants were indebted to the government • Heavy burden of redemption payments (abolished after 1905-07 revolution) • Inequality in land distribution • Agricultural commune (communal land tenure) was an obstacle for economic growth - egalitarian institution (taxes, redemption payments, communal works were the responsibility of the commune) - dismantled in 1906 by Stolypin’s decree Stolypin reforms of 1906 • Dissolution of the community – mir –obschina. Peasants got the right to leave the community - khutor and otrub peasants households • Mortgages for peasants to buy out land from the landlords • Migration to new territories Lenin's article “The Last Valve”: elimination of the commune is the last valve that could be opened in the overheating steam machine of the tsarist regime without liquidating large land ownership. No more valves
  • From Socialism to Market Economy: the Transition Problem

    From Socialism to Market Economy: the Transition Problem

    Upjohn Press Upjohn Research home page 1-1-1992 From Socialism to Market Economy: The Transition Problem William S. Kern Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://research.upjohn.org/up_press Part of the International Economics Commons Citation Kern, William S., ed. 1992. From Socialism to Market Economy: The Transition Problem. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880995641 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This title is brought to you by the Upjohn Institute. For more information, please contact [email protected]. C/5"T1 ^ut^r :Svv=a J^F>?MS 1^1^ ^^PSg-pwpt^lMl^S^^I5*! B-ft) From SOCIALISM to MARKET ECONOMY The Transition Problem William S. Kern, Editor 1992 W.E. UPJOHN INSTITUTE for Employment Research Kalamazoo, Michigan Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data From socialism to market economy: the transition problem / William S. Kern, editor, p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88099-129-1 (hard). — ISBN 0-88099-130-5 (pbk.) 1. Soviet Union—Economic policy—1986-1991—Congresses. 2. Post- communism—Soviet Union—Congresses. 3. Europe, Eastern—Economic policy—1989—Congresses. 4. Post-communism—Europe, Eastern— Congresses. I. Kern, William S., 1952- HC336.26.F77 1992 338.947—dc2 92-26336 CIP Copyright © 1992 WE. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 300 S. Westnedge Avenue Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007 THE INSTITUTE, a nonprofit research organization, was established on July 1, 1945. It is an activity of the W.E. Upjohn Unemployment Trustee Corporation, which was formed in 1932 to administer a fund set aside by the late Dr.
  • 77 3 the Estimation of Gross Domestic Product and Its Growth

    77 3 the Estimation of Gross Domestic Product and Its Growth

    LA7.772 - 3 The Estimation of Gross Domestic Product and Its Growth Rate for the German Democratic Republic Public Disclosure Authorized Irwin L. Collier . r', 'WORLD BANK STAFF WORKING PAPERS Number 773 A Background Study for Doilar GNPs of the U.S.S.R. anid Ensfern Euirope Public Disclosure Authorized 0- ..- Public Disclosure Authorized 0 0- Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD BANK STAFF WORKING PAPERS Number 773 A Background Study for Dollar GNPs of the U.S.S.R. and Eastern Europe The Estimation of Gross Domestic Producd and Its Growth Rate for the German Democratic Republic Irwin L. Collier The World Bank Washington, D.C., U.S.A. Copyright (© 1985 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing November 1985 This is a working document published informally by the World Bank. To present the results of research with the least possible delay, the typescript has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. The publication is supplied at a token charge to defray part of the cost of manufacdtue and distribution. The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressed herein, which are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organizations. The findings, interpretations, and conclusioins are the results of rescilch supported by the Bank; they do not necessarily represent official policy of the Bank.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Estimating Internationally Comparable Per Capita Income Numbers Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized International Economics Department June 24, 1994 Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................... 1 IT. Issues in measurement of income in national currencies ..................... 2 ill Issues in choice of a common numeraire ....................................... .5 IV. Country comparisons by composite indicators ................................ 11 V. The Bank's approach to country comparisons ................................ 13 VI. Conclusion .......................................................................... 17 Annexes I: Production Approach to Purchasing Power Parities ........................ 19 IT: GNP Estimates and ICP Aggregation Procedures ............................ 21 Til: The Standard Atlas Method of Estimating GNP in U. S. Dollars ......... 24 IV: Consistent use of SDR Deflator in the Bank's GNP Comparisons ........ 27 References ................................................................................... 29 Estimating Internationally Comparable Per Capita Income Numbers I. Introduction 1. This paper reviews the methodological and data issues in estimation of per capita income on an internationally comparable basis, and sets out the Bank's current and prospective practices in generating such numbers for operational uses. 1 Compilation of these estimates requires measurement
  • Liaiblity for Defective Products in the Soviet Union: Socialist Law Versus Soviet Reality Bruce L

    Liaiblity for Defective Products in the Soviet Union: Socialist Law Versus Soviet Reality Bruce L

    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 8 Issue 3 Winter Winter 1988 Liaiblity for Defective Products in the Soviet Union: Socialist Law Versus Soviet Reality Bruce L. Ottley Younghee Jin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the Products Liability Commons Recommended Citation Bruce L. Ottley, Younghee Jin, Liaiblity for Defective Products in the Soviet Union: Socialist Law Versus Soviet Reality, 8 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 640 (1987-1988) This Perspective is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. PERSPECTIVE Liability for Defective Products in the Soviet Union: Socialist Law Versus Soviet Reality Bruce L. Ottley* Younghee Jin** CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 641 II. PRODUCT LIABILITY WITHIN THE SOVIET UNION ......... 643 A. Contractual Liability ................................. 644 1. Liability of Trade Enterprises to Consumers ........ 644 2. Liability Between State Enterprises ................. 647 B. Tort Liability ........................................ 649 III. LEGAL REFORM AND SOVIET PRODUCT LIABILITY ........ 653 A. The Structure of the Soviet Economy ................. 654 B. W orker Attitudes ..................................... 657 C. Bureaucratic Resistance .............................
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    ReportNo. 8249-VN Vietnam Stabilizationand StructuralReforms An Economic Report April30, 1990 Public Disclosure Authorized CountryOperations Division CountryDepartment 11 AsiaRegion FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Docunentof theWorld Bank Thisdocument has a restricteddistribution and may be usedby recipients Public Disclosure Authorized only in theperformnance of their officialduties. Its contentsmay not otherwise be disclosedwithout World Bankauthorization. Currency Equlvalents The Vietnamese currency is the dong (D). A currency reform in 1985 replaced ten old dong with one new dong. Calendar 1989 December 1989 US$1.00 = D 3,996 US$1.00 = D 4,000 D 1,000 = US $0.25 D 1,000 = US$ 0.25 Fiscal Year January 1 - December 31 Wei2hts and Measures Metric System Ust of Acronvms ASEAN - Association of South East Asian Nations COMECON - Council of Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) EEC - European Economic Community FAO - Food and Agricultural Organization GDP - Gross Domestic Product GNP - Gross National Product GVAP - Gross Value of Agricultural Product IMF - International Monetary Fund MPS - Material Product System NFA - Net Foreign Assets NMP - Net Material Product TR - Transferable Ruble UNDP - United Nations Development Programme UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization UNICEF - United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY VIET NAM ECONOMIC REPORT Table of Contents Page No. SUFMARY.i... I. COUNTRY SETTING . .1 A. Introduction ..... .. B. Physical Setting and Human Resource Endowments 2 C. The Economy .... 7 II. RECENTECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS ............... 12 A. An Overview of Economic Reforms, 1986-89 .12 B. Developments in Output and Prices . 14 C. Public Finance .21 D. Monetary Policy and Interest Rates .
  • Post-War Reconstruction and Development in the Golden Age of Capitalism

    Post-War Reconstruction and Development in the Golden Age of Capitalism

    Chapter II Post-war reconstruction and development in the Golden Age of Capitalism Key messages • The World Economic and Social Survey was an early proponent of development as a process of large-scale struc- tural and institutional change for the promotion of high standards of living, full employment and social progress. Starting from the first edition, issued in January 1948, the Survey recognized the need for coordinated interna- tional action to accelerate economic growth, facilitate the cross-border flow of goods and services and support effective utilization of resources in the context of an expanding and integrated world economy. • The expansion of international trade and a functioning payments system were recognized as two critical factors for development in the post-Second World War period. However, large fluctuations in commodity prices and, cor- respondingly, in foreign exchange earnings were a source of economic instability for many developing countries back then and this has continued to be the case right up to the present. • In the 1950s, the flexibility that European countries were afforded in meeting their International Monetary Fund- related obligations enabled the successful creation of the multilateral international payments system. Six years after the initial commitment, most Western Europe countries had eliminated foreign exchange restrictions and established current account convertibility. A similar flexibility in debt negotiations was important for the facilita- tion of a rapid recovery in Europe in the post-Second World War period as well as in Latin America in the 1930s. • International solidarity has played an important role in development and reconstruction. Western European countries received resources equivalent to 1 per cent of the gross national product of the United States of Amer- ica in the period from 1948 to 1952 through the Marshall Plan.
  • Introduction of the Sna Into the Official Statistics of the Commonwealth of Independent States

    Introduction of the Sna Into the Official Statistics of the Commonwealth of Independent States

    Review of Income and Wealth Series 39, Number 3, Septembcr 1993 INTRODUCTION OF THE SNA INTO THE OFFICIAL STATISTICS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES BY YOURIIVANOV, BORIS RJABUSHKIN, AND TATJANAHOMENKO Statisticul Committee of the Cornmonweulth of Independent States The work on the introduction of the elements of the SNA into the official statistical practice of the former U.S.S.R. began in 1988 when estimates of the GDP using conversion keys were prepared. In 1991 the decision was made to implement the entire SNA gradually on the basis of the international standards. The methodology of compilation of the main accounts was formulated by the Statistical Committcc of the C.I.S. with the assistance of the OECD. It originally drew on the ESA with introduc- tion of elements of the revised SNA and adaption to specific economic processes in the country. It required solution of a number of conceptual and statistical problems referring to the treatment, allocation and valuation of selected activities. The estimates of the main accounts were made for the former U.S.S.R. by sectors and by industries for 1988-90. This project has provided the basis for further work on implementation of the SNA in C.I.S. countries. The purposes of this paper are: (i) to review briefly the current status of work, originally undertaken by the Goskomstat of the U.S.S.R. and later taken over by Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (C.I.S.) to introduce the system of national accounts into official statistical practice and to describe, in particular, the outline of the emerging accounting structure, (ii) to present the results of the compilation of the major aggregates and accounts for a number of recent years and (iii) to discuss selected conceptual and practical problems which arise in the context of this project.
  • Socialism, Growth and Theory: the Case of the USSR and Central Europe Ca

    Socialism, Growth and Theory: the Case of the USSR and Central Europe Ca

    Central planning, economic growth: a theoretical and empirical application on the USSR and Central Europe ca. 1920-2000 Peter Foldvari , Bas van Leeuwen and Dmitry Didenko Abstract On the one hand, many studies argue that physical capital accumulation drove economic growth in the early socialist period. Other studies, however, have argued that the physical/human capital ratio was negatively related to economic growth implying that fast growth of physical capital may lead to lower economic growth. In this paper we show theoretically and empirically that the physical to human capital ratio must be (slightly) higher than in the West. Applying regression analysis, we find that the effect of the physical to human capital is highly positive and significant during the socialist period. This effect is even bigger when we use NMP instead of GDP, once more confirming the logic behind the socialist growth model. Only after the fall of socialism the effect of the physical to human capital ratio turned negative. The same pattern can be found for Austria, having a positive (but less high) effect of the physical/human capital ratio in the 1950s-1970s, and a negative relation afterwards. This suggest that growth patterns were similar albeit more pronounced in the socialist countries. 1. Introduction The economic transition in the countries with centrally planned economy (those identified themselves as socialist and those were often referred to in a political slang as the „Eastern bloc‟) has triggered many studies in its underlying sources of growth. Many of those make use of some sort of growth accounting framework in which they decompose GDP growth in physical (or fixed) capital, sometimes human capital, and some sort of residual factor, TFP, which is supposed to capture technological change.
  • Soviet Foreign Trade and the Money Supply

    Soviet Foreign Trade and the Money Supply

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nakamura, Yasushi Working Paper Soviet foreign trade and the money supply BOFIT Discussion Papers, No. 30/2013 Provided in Cooperation with: Bank of Finland, Helsinki Suggested Citation: Nakamura, Yasushi (2013) : Soviet foreign trade and the money supply, BOFIT Discussion Papers, No. 30/2013, ISBN 978-952-6699-57-8, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition (BOFIT), Helsinki, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:NBN:fi:bof-201408072191 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/212785 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
  • Economy of the Public Disclosure Authorized USS-J% Public Disclosure Authorized

    Economy of the Public Disclosure Authorized USS-J% Public Disclosure Authorized

    9047 The Economy of the Public Disclosure Authorized USS-J% Public Disclosure Authorized International Monetary Fund The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Public Disclosure Authorized FILE COPY The Economy of the USSR Summary and Recommendations International Monetary Fund The World Bank Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development European Bank for Reconstruction and Development The World Bank Washington, D.C. @ 1990 International Monetary Fund; International Bank for Reconstruction and Devel- opment/The World Bank; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing December 1990 This study has been prepared by the staffs of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and by consultants to the designated president of the European Bank for Reconstruction and De- velopment. The findings, conclusions, and interpretations expressed in this paper are those of the staff concerned and should not be attributed to the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, to the executive boards or council of these organizations, or to their member governments. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Economy of the USSR: a study undertaken in response to a request by the Houston Summit: summary and recommendations/International Monetary Fund ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8213-1768-7 1. Soviet Union-Economic Conditions-1985- 2.