Mpifg Report 2008–2009 Directors Prof
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
UNIVERSITY of COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 UNIVERSITY of COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 Contents
UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 Contents Foreword 5 Highlights 2016 6 Research 10 Teaching 38 University and Society 56 Honours 66 Personnel 76 Infrastructure 88 Governance 96 Donations 114 List of Abbreviations 119 Publication Details 120 University of Cologne Foreword 6 | 7 Professor Dr Axel Freimuth With its educational mandate and as an engine for research and innovation, the University of Cologne is making a major contribution to the development of our society. Universities stand for new ideas and current scientific developments and opportunities and makes it possib- change, often coming from a com- firmly embedded in social discourse. le for us to become involved in a pletely unexpected direction. They Our dynamic international network diverse range of areas. Moreover, are an engine for research and in- – with 85 partner universities and I would like to thank our many fri- novation and help to solve pressing more than 500 Faculty partnerships ends and benefactors as well as problems in our society. Moreover, – as well as the international and di- our collaboration partners for their they are in increasing demand as verse life on campus create a cosmo- continuous and generous support. educational institutions: Today, one politan and stimulating atmosphere Their commitment helps to stimula- in two young people in Germany and excellent opportunities for aca- te social discourse with and within starts a degree programme. Besi- demic exchange. our university, thus creating a fer- des preparing our students for a tile environment for contemporary professional career, the UoC’s stu- This Annual Report provides infor- research and teaching. -
Governing Society – Politics Versus Markets?
MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR GESELLSCHAFTSFORSCHUNG MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES MPIfG Press Release | 20 November 2009 Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG) Paulstr. 3 | 50676 Köln Germany The Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Celebrates Editorial and Its Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Public Relations Unit Governing Society – Politics versus Markets? Christel Schommertz phone 0221 2767-130 Since 1984 the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG) has been fax 0221 2767-430 conducting research on the governance of modern societies. It is one of the lea- [email protected] ding research institutes in the world in this field. Today the institute’s research The MPIfG online concentrates on the social and political foundations of modern economies. On www.mpifg.de December 4, 2009, the MPIfG will mark its twenty-fifth anniversary with a cele- bration at the Wallraf-Richartz-Museum in Cologne. When it founded the Max Planck Insti- tute for the Study of Societies in 1984, the Max Planck Society reinforced its interest in supporting research on hu- man society. Like all other Max Planck institutes, the MPIfG is committed to basic research and theory develop- ment. The newly created institute began by examining the governance of modern societies. The objective was to deve- Gebäude des MPIfG in der Kölner Südstadt lop a realistic, practically useful social science-based theory of the governance of modern societies by an interventionist state in cooperation with an organized society. A second phase of research beginning in the 1990s concentrated on new forms of multilevel policymaking and the impact of economic liberalization on countries and governments. -
Ringberg Meeting “Bounding the Aerosol Effective Radiative Forcing”
Ringberg meeting “Bounding the aerosol effective radiative forcing” 26 February – 2 March 2018, Schloss Ringberg, Kreuth, Germany Goal: The aim1 is to exclude unlikely strong and weak aerosol forcings (e.g. provide arguments why the aerosol forcing cannot be more negative than -1.5 Wm-2, or why it cannot be positive). We aim for likelihood rather than certainty. Each participant is invited to submit a 1-page list of theses about likely/unlikely aerosol to the group ([email protected]) before the workshop. Concept: One presenter per session - prepares a limited number of theses that quantify or constrain forcings/mechanisms - all participants are invited to submit theses to the presentations - theses can (should) be corroborated briefly by explanations/graphics/references - presenters distribute the theses until late January so participants can prepare for the discussions At the meeting, one rapporteur per session - moderates the plenum discussions and - takes notes for the wrap-up discussions on Friday A large part of the discussions will be in breakout groups: - three breakout groups with 10-12 participants each; - distribution will be randomly selected and change each time, and - a rapporteur per breakout group per session will also be randomly appointed Location: Ringberg Castle (www.schloss-ringberg.de). Participants are expected to cover their own expenses (travel to Munich + 2 hr train from airport / 1 hr from railway station plus 126 € / night including all meals) and be in residence for the duration of the workshop. If financial restrictions might prevent you from coming please let us know and we will look for ways to help offset some or all of the costs. -
Joshua Telser Curriculum Vitae
JOSHUA TELSER CURRICULUM VITAE Department of Biological, Physical, and Health Sciences voice: 1 312 341 3687 Roosevelt University fax: 1 312 341 4358 430 S. Michigan Ave. E-mail: [email protected] Chicago, IL 60605-1394 USA Website: http://blogs.roosevelt.edu/jtelser/ EDUCATION: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL; USPHS/NIH Postdoctoral Fellow, September 1984 – September 1986. Postdoctoral advisor: Prof. Brian M. Hoffman. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry, December 1984. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; graduate student in Inorganic Chemistry, 1980 – 1983. Thesis advisor: Prof. Russell S. Drago (deceased). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; A.B. in Chemistry (with distinction), May 1980. WORK EXPERIENCE: 9/95 – present: Associate Professor of Chemistry, Roosevelt University, Chicago/Schaumburg, IL; Chemistry Program Coordinator, 1998 – 2000. Assistant Chair, Department of Biological, Chemical and Physical Sciences, 2005 – 2012; 2016 – 2018; Assistant Chair, Department of Biological, Physical, and Health Sciences, 2018 – present. 9/90 – 9/95: Assistant Professor of Chemistry. Taught General Chemistry I and II (CHEM 201, 202), Organic Chemistry Survey (CHEM 210), Inorganic Chemistry (CHEM 341/441), Organometallic Chemistry (CHEM 319/419), Bioinorganic Chemistry (BCHM/CHEM 344/444), and Analytical, Organic, Inorganic, and Physical Chemistry Laboratory courses (CHEM 203, 210, 347, 325), Chemistry Seminar (CHEM 393/493). Research in paramagnetic resonance and magnetic properties of inorganic and biological systems. 9/89 – 9/90: Research Associate, Department of Biochemistry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Research on enzyme catalysis using nitroxide spin-labeled substrates and vanadyl-nucleotide complexes. 4/88 – 9/89: Research Investigator, Contrast Media Department, Squibb Institute for Medical Research, New Brunswick, NJ. -
Germany Differentiates Its Universities Toni Feder
Germany differentiates its universities Toni Feder Citation: Phys. Today 65(8), 24 (2012); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.1673 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1673 View Table of Contents: http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/PHTOAD/v65/i8 Published by the American Institute of Physics. Additional resources for Physics Today Homepage: http://www.physicstoday.org/ Information: http://www.physicstoday.org/about_us Daily Edition: http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition Downloaded 21 Aug 2012 to 141.20.210.36. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://www.physicstoday.org/about_us/terms issues and events pressurization typically lasts for only a agree that these risks are serious, I dis- tus, a climate economist with the Union few hours. By contrast, the injection of agree with the authors’ claim that they of Concerned Scientists. “Honestly, the large volumes of CO2 over many years will likely render CCS unsuccessful,” he challenges to CCS are so significant on will steadily build pressure in the reser- says. The quakes attributed to fluid in- the economic front that this is just going voir, according to the NRC committee jection have been at magnitudes below to be one more thing that makes people and Zoback. the damage threshold, Juanes notes. The question the risk of going down that But a breach in the sealing cap evidence presented by Zoback and path versus other options that are read- doesn’t necessarily mean that the CO2 Gorelick is anecdotal and “does not jus- ily available and much less risky, such will return to the biosphere, Litynski tify the conclusion that moderate-size as wind and solar,” she says. -
20 Jahre Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
2 3 INHALT 49 Im Gespräch – Vorsitzende und Präsidenten von 1995–2015 50 Joachim Treusch 5 54 Detlev Ganten 58 Walter Kröll 7 Vorwort 62 Jürgen Mlynek 9 Die Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft in historischer Perspektive 121 Die Gemeinschaft und ihre 18 Forschungs zentren 66 Die Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 122 Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum im Porträt für Polar- und Meeresforschung 124 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY 70 Forschungsbereiche auf einen Blick 126 Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum 72 Energie 128 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt 80 Erde und Umwelt 130 Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative 88 Gesundheit Erkrankungen (DZNE) 96 Luftfahrt, Raumfahrt und Verkehr 132 Forschungszentrum Jülich 104 Materie 134 GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum 112 Schlüsseltechnologien für Ozeanforschung Kiel 136 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung 138 Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie 140 Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf 142 Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung 144 Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ 146 Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Zentrum für Material- und Küstenforschung 148 Helmholtz Zentrum München – Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt 150 Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam – Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ 152 Karlsruher Institut für Technologie 154 Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin (MDC) Berlin-Buch 156 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 159 Impressum 6 Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, 7 die Geschichte der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft ist auch eine Geschichte der Forschung in der Bundesrepublik -
Cv Pascalfries.Pdf
Prof. Dr. Pascal Fries Tel: (+49) (0)69 96 769 500 Director Fax: (+49) (0)69 96 769 555 Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in [email protected] Cooperation with Max Planck Society http://www.esi-frankfurt.de http://www.esi- Deutschordenstraße 46 frankfurt.de/research/fries-lab 60528 Frankfurt am Main CV Prof. Dr. Pascal Fries 10 June 2021 Citations Date of birth 28 January 1972 Education 2000 Ph.D. from Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Medical School. Supervisor: Prof. Wolf Singer, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany. 1998 M.D. from Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Medical School, Frankfurt, Germany. Professional Since 2009 Director of the Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for experience Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany. Since 2008 Scientific Member of the Max Planck Society. Since 2008 Professor of Systems Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2001 - 2009 Principal Investigator, F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 1999 - 2001 Postdoctoral Research Fellow with Dr. Robert Desimone, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 1998 - 1999 Postdoctoral Research Fellow with Prof. Wolf Singer, Max Curriculum Vitae | Prof. Dr. Pascal Fries 1 Planck Institute for Brain Research, Department of Neurophysiology, Frankfurt, Germany. 1998 - 1999 Residency at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Frankfurt, Germany. Awards and Honors 2020 2020 Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher (formerly known as “ISI highly Cited of Thomson Reuters). 2019 2019 Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher 2018 2018 Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher 2017 2017 Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher 2016 2016 Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher 2008 Boehringer Ingelheim FENS (Federation of European Neuroscience Societies) Research Award. -
Curriculum Vitae
CURRICULUMVITAE Ralf S. Klessen Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Universitätsprofessor Zentrum für Astronomie (ZAH) Dr. rer. nat. Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik (ITA) Albert-Ueberle-Str. 2, 69120 Heidelberg Germany Tel: +49-6221/54-8978 Fax: +49-6221/54-4221 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/∼ralf Personal Data: German, born 18th February 1968, married, four children Wilhelm-Blum-Straße 12–14, 69120 Heidelberg Education and Working Experience: 9/14 — 6/15 Sabbatical Stay at UC Santa Cruz and Stanford University 9/12 — 8/14 Dean of Study, Faculty for Physics and Astronomy 11/11 — Member of the Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR) 1/10 — 8/10 Sabbatical Stay at Stanford University and UC Santa Cruz 11/07 — 10/12 Managing Director of the Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics 8/08 — 12/13 Deputy Director of the Center of Astronomy at Heidelberg University 4/06 — Professor (W3) of Theoretical Astrophysics at Heidelberg University 4/04 Appointment as Privatdozent at Potsdam University 3/03 — 1/04 Habilitation at Potsdam University 1/02 — 3/06 Head of the Emmy Noether Research Group in “Theory of Star Forma- tion” at the Astrophysical Institute Potsdam 10/00 — 12/01 Otto Hahn Fellow at Lick Observatory, Santa Cruz, sponsored by the Max Planck Society 9/98 — 8/00 Postdoctoral position at Leiden Observatory, The Netherlands 11/94 — 6/98 Dissertation at the University of Heidelberg. Thesis research at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg. Title of thesis: “Fragmenta- tion of Molecular Clouds: The Initial Phases of a Stellar Cluster”. -
Gene Center Munich Report 2004-2008 Contents
GENE CENTER MUNICH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOR THE LIFE SCIENCES GENE CENTER MUNICH REPORT 2004-2008 CONTENTS Publisher: Gene Center Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 25 81377 Munich Germany Phone: +49 89 2180 - 769 65 Fax: +49 89 2180 - 769 99 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.lmb.uni-muenchen.de INTRODUCTION BY PAST GROUP LEADERS Planning, co-ordination, graphics, and editing: Manuela Niessing, Gene Center Munich THE PRESIDENT OF LMU MUNICH Page 03 Ralf-Peter Jansen Page 42 Claudia Petritsch Page 44 Co-ordination LMU Munich: THE DIRECTOR’S REPORT Page 04 Stefan Weiss Page 46 Communications & Media Relations, LMU Munich Contributions: CURRENT GROUP LEADERS FACILITIES AND SERVICES Responsible for the contents are Patrick Cramer and the Roland Beckmann Page 14 LAFUGA Page 48 other group leaders of the Gene Center Munich. Karl-Klaus Conzelmann Page 16 New research facilities Page 50 Layout and design: Patrick Cramer Page 18 Administration and service personnel Page 54 Christine Meyer Design, Munich Klaus Förstemann Page 20 Translations: Ulrike Gaul Page 22 APPENDICES Alison Moffat, Translation Services, Munich Karl-Peter Hopfner Page 24 Publications and invited lectures Page 56 Ulrich Koszinowski Page 26 Service and patents Page 72 Print: Peschke Druck GmbH, Munich Dierk Niessing Page 28 Seminars Page 74 Johannes Söding Page 30 Gene Center in the media Page 78 Photography: Katja Strässer Page 32 Campus Grosshadern-Martinsried Page 84 Gene Center Munich Communications & Media Relations, LMU Munich Achim Tresch Page 34 Jan Greune Petra Wendler Page 36 Thorsten Naeser Daniel N. Wilson Page 38 Sebastian Vollmert Tobias Koschubs Eckhard Wolf Page 40 Otto Berninghausen Elmar Czeko Anselm Kusser Heidi Feldmann Manfred Schülein All copy rights of the scientific figures are owned by the respective group leaders. -
Nanomagnetism
Message from the Director 6 The Very Best of nanoGUNE 8 1 Researchers in Action 10 Nanomagnetism 12 Nanooptics 14 Self-Assembly 16 Nanodevices 18 Electron Microscopy 20 Theory 22 Nanomaterials 24 Nanoimaging 26 2 State-of-the-art Infrastructure 28 3 Scientific Outputs 32 Highlighted publications 34 Conferences, workshops, and schools 56 Invited Talks 58 Seminars 63 ISI Publications 66 Cooperation agreements 72 4 Industry Overview 74 5 Connecting with Society 78 6 Organization and Funding 82 nanoPeople 90 Message from the Director Advances in nanoscience and nanotechnology are nowadays at the heart of the technological development of our soci- ety. Our current ability to observe and control matter at the atomic and molecular scale (the nanoscale) will allow, in the next few decades, the design of new objects and the devel- opment of more efficient and less expensive manufacturing processes in a great variety of industry sectors. At CIC nanoGUNE Consolider, it is our mission to carry out world-class nanoscience research, thus contributing to the creation of the necessary conditions for the Basque Country (and the humanity, in general) to benefit from a wide range of nanotechnologies: confronting new scientific challenges through cooperation with other research and technological agents in the Basque Country and worldwide, building bridges that fill the gap between basic science and technology, as well as promoting high-level training and out- reach activities. In the launching period 2007-2010, we were successful in putting together a state-of-the-art -
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Stuttgart Center for Electron Microscopy – StEM Heisenbergstrasse 3, D-70569, Stuttgart, Germany www.is.mpg.de/StEM StEM Workshop at Ringberg Castle, Lake Tegernsee, Germany July 11th – July 13th, 2012 Programme Wednesday, July 11th, 2012 12.30 Lunch 14.30 – 14.40 Opening and Welcome Peter A. van Aken Chair: Wilfried Sigle 14:40 – 15:20 Fritz Phillipp, StEM The long way to the Cs-Corrector in Electron Microscopy 15:20 – 15:40 Nahid Talebi, StEM Outlooks and progresses in EELS of Plasmonic modes 15:40 – 16:00 Burcu Ögüt, StEM Tomorrow of plasmonics with aberration corrected transmission electron microscopy 16:00 Coffee break 16:30 – 16:50 Eric Detemple, StEM The benefit of Cs-corrected STEM for the study of nickelate superlattices 16:50 – 17:10 Dmitry Tyutyunnikov, StEM Data acquisition for 3D strain mapping 17:10 – 17:30 Cigdem Özsoy, StEM What could be the benefits of Cs correction for electron holography? 18:00 Dinner Thursday, July 12th, 2012 Chair: Fritz Phillipp 09:00 – 09:40 Masashi Watanabe, Betlehem, USA Atomic resolution chemical analysis towards quantification 09:40 – 10:20 Vesna Srot, StEM Electron tomography and analytical STEM for characterization of composite materials 10:20 – 10:40 Dan Zhou, StEM Delithiation Process Study of LiFePO4 with Transmission Electron Microscopy 10:40 Coffee break 11:00 – 11:40 Wilfried Sigle, StEM Annular bright-field imaging 11:40 – 12:20 Behnaz Rahmati, StEM Implementation of Vortex Aperture into JEM-ARM 200 F Microscope for performing EMCD Experiments -
Booklet Peter Gruss.Pdf
KAPITELÜBERSCHRIFT INHALTSVERZEICHNIS IMPRESSUM 05 Erneuerungsfähigkeit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft stärken Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. 27 Exzellente Köpfe gewinnen Hofgartenstr. 8, D - 80539 München Tel.: +49 (0) 89 2108-1276 39 Internationale Sichtbarkeit erhöhen E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.mpg.de 47 Deutsches Wissenschaftssystem voranbringen Redaktion 55 Finanzierung sichern Iris Karabelas / Mechthild Schmid 63 Anliegen der Wissenschaft in Politik und Öffentlichkeit vermitteln Grafiken Dalija Budimlic 71 Offenen Zugang zu Forschungsergebnissen ermöglichen Gestaltung 77 Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft zusammenführen HAAK & NAKAT, München [www.haak-nakat.de] 87 Chronik, Weitere Funktionsträger an der Seite des Präsidenten, Vita 3 ERNEUERUNGSFÄHIGKEIT DER MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT STÄRKEN 1 80% DER NEUBERUFUNGEN SIND NICHT IM FELD DES VOrgÄNgers ERNEUERUNGSFÄHIGKEIT DER MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT STÄRKEN PERSPEKTIVENKOMMISSION THEMEN REDE VOR DEM WISSENSCHAFTLICHEN RAT kommissionen gesteuert. Es war ein wichti- 19.02.2009 ger Schritt, die perspektivische Planung der Oft wird von außen übersehen, dass die Max- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft auf eine breite, und Planck-Gesellschaft weit mehr ist als die Sum- zwar Max-Planck-weite Basis zu stellen – sozu- me ihrer Institute. Die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft sagen den Max-Planck-Organismus zu kräfti- ist vielmehr ein Organismus, der sich aus dem gen! Mittlerweile haben alle drei Sektionen Zusammenwirken ihrer Wissenschaftlerinnen Perspektivenkommissionen eingerichtet, die die und Wissenschaftler bildet. Das einzelne Max- Konzepte der Institute im Bezug auf die ganze BERATUNGSPROZESS Planck-Institut ist kein Satellit, der auf Dauer Sektion betrachten. erfolgreich alleine fliegen kann oder gar abge- Die Aufgabenstellung und der Grad der perspek- trennt an einer anderen Einrichtung erfolgreich tivischen Analyse in der Perspektivenkommissi- weiterbestehen könnte.