Organophosphate Insecticides

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organophosphate Insecticides CHAPTER 4 HIGHLIGHTS Organophosphate Insecticides Acts through phosphorylation of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme Since the removal of organochlorine insecticides from use, organophosphate at nerve endings insecticides have become the most widely used insecticides available today. More Absorbed by inhalation, than forty of them are currently registered for use and all run the risk of acute ingestion, and skin and subacute toxicity. Organophosphates are used in agriculture, in the home, penetration in gardens, and in veterinary practice. All apparently share a common mecha- Muscarinic, nicotinic & CNS nism of cholinesterase inhibition and can cause similar symptoms. Because they effects share this mechanism, exposure to the same organophosphate by multiple routes or to multiple organophosphates by multiple routes can lead to serious additive Signs and Symptoms: toxicity. It is important to understand, however, that there is a wide range of Headache, hypersecretion, toxicity in these agents and wide variation in cutaneous absorption, making muscle twitching, nausea, specific identification and management quite important. diarrhea Respiratory depression, seizures, loss of consciousness Toxicology Miosis is often a helpful Organophosphates poison insects and mammals primarily by phosphory- diagnostic sign lation of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme (AChE) at nerve endings. The result is a loss of available AChE so that the effector organ becomes overstimulated by Treatment: the excess acetylcholine (ACh, the impulse-transmitting substance) in the nerve Clear airway, improve tissue ending. The enzyme is critical to normal control of nerve impulse transmission oxygenation from nerve fibers to smooth and skeletal muscle cells, glandular cells, and Administer atropine sulfate autonomic ganglia, as well as within the central nervous system (CNS). Some intravenously critical proportion of the tissue enzyme mass must be inactivated by phospho- Pralidoxime may be rylation before symptoms and signs of poisoning become manifest. indicated At sufficient dosage, loss of enzyme function allows accumulation of ACh Proceed concurrently with peripherally at cholinergic neuroeffector junctions (muscarinic effects), skeletal decontamination nerve-muscle junctions, and autonomic ganglia (nicotinic effects), as well as centrally. At cholinergic nerve junctions with smooth muscle and gland cells, high ACh concentration causes muscle contraction and secretion, respectively. Contraindicated: At skeletal muscle junctions, excess ACh may be excitatory (cause muscle twitch- Morphine, succinylcholine, theophylline, ing), but may also weaken or paralyze the cell by depolarizing the end-plate. In phenothiazines, reserpine the CNS, high ACh concentrations cause sensory and behavioral disturbances, incoordination, depressed motor function, and respiratory depression. Increased pulmonary secretions coupled with respiratory failure are the usual causes of death from organophosphate poisoning. Recovery depends ultimately on gen- eration of new enzyme in all critical tissues. 34 ORGANOPHOSPHATES COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS acephate VC-13 Nemacide hosalone phosmet Orthene dichlorvos Zolone Imidan azinphos-methyl+ DDVP IBP Prolate Gusathion Vapona Kitazin phosphamidon+ Guthion dicrotophos+ iodofenphos Dimecron bensulide Bidrin Nuvanol-N phostebupirim Betasan dimefos+ isazofos Aztec Lescosan Hanane Brace phoxim bomyl+ Pestox XIV Miral Baythion Swat dimethoate Triumph pirimiphos-ethyl bromophos Cygon isofenphos+ Primicid Nexion DeFend Amaze pirimiphos-methyl bromophos-ethyl dioxathion+ Oftanol Actellic Nexagan Delnav isoxathion profenofos cadusafos disulfoton+ E-48 Curacron Apache Disyston Karphos propetamphos Ebufos ditalimfos leptophos Safrotin Rugby edifenphos Phosvel propyl thiopyro- carbophenothion+ endothion+ malathion phosphate+ Trithion EPBP Cythion Aspon chlorethoxyfos S-Seven mephosfolan+ prothoate Fortress EPN+ Cytrolane Fac chlorfenvinphos ethion merphos pyrazophos Apachlor Ethanox Easy off-D Afugan Birlane ethoprop Folex Curamil chlormephos+ Mocap methamidophos+ pyridaphenthion Dotan ethyl parathion+ Monitor Ofunack chlorphoxim E605 methidathion+ quinalphos Baythion-C Parathion Supracide Bayrusil chlorpyrifos thiophos Ultracide ronnel Brodan etrimfos methyl parathion+ Fenchlorphos Dursban Ekamet E 601 Korlan Lorsban famphur+ Penncap-M schradan+ chlorthiophos+ Bash methyl trithion OMPA Celathion Bo-Ana mevinphos+ sulfotep+ coumaphos+ Famfos Duraphos Bladafum Asuntol fenamiphos+ Phosdrin Dithione Co-Ral Nemacur mipafox+ Thiotepp crotoxyphos fenitrothion Isopestox sulprofos Ciodrin Accothion Pestox XV Bolstar Cypona Agrothion monocrotophos+ Helothion crufomate Sumithion Azodrin temephos Ruelene fenophosphon+ naled Abate cyanofenphos+ Agritox Dibrom Abathion Surecide trichloronate oxydemeton-methyl terbufos cyanophos fensulfothion+ Metasystox-R Contraven Cyanox Dasanit oxydeprofos Counter cythioate fenthion Metasystox-S tetrachlorvinphos Cyflee Baytex phencapton Gardona + Indicates high toxicity. Highly Proban Entex G 28029 Rabon toxic organophosphates have DEF Tiguvon phenthoate tetraethyl pyrophos- listed oral LD50 values (rat) less + + De-Green fonofos dimephenthoate phate than or equal to 50 mg/kg body E-Z-Off D Dyfonate Phenthoate TEPP weight. Most other organo- + + demeton N-2790 phorate triazophos phosphates included in this table systox formothion Rampart Hostathion are considered moderately toxic, demeton-S-methyl Anthio Thimet trichlorfon with LD50 values in excess of 50 + Duratox fosthietan phosalone Dipterex mg/kg and less than 500 mg/kg. MetasystoxI Nem-A-Tak Azofene Dylox dialifor+ heptenophos Zolone Neguvon Torak Hostaquick phosfolan+ Proxol diazinon hiometon Cylan dichlorofenthion Ekatin Cyolane ORGANOPHOSPHATES 35 Organophosphates are efficiently absorbed by inhalation, ingestion, and skin penetration. There is considerable variation in the relative absorption by these various routes. For instance, the oral LD50 of parathion in rats is between 3-8 mg/ kg, which is quite toxic,1,2 and essentially equivalent to dermal absorption with 2 an LD50 of 8 mg/kg. On the other hand, the toxicity of phosalone is much lower from the dermal route than the oral route, with rat LD50s of 1500 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg, respectively.2 In general, the highly toxic agents are more likely to have high-order dermal toxicity than the moderately toxic agents. Chemical Classes: To some degree, the occurrence of poisoning depends on the rate at which the pesticide is absorbed. Breakdown occurs chiefly by hydrolysis in the liver; rates of hydrolysis vary widely from one compound to another. In the case of certain organophosphates whose breakdown is relatively slow, significant temporary storage in body fat may occur. Some organophos- phates such as diazinon and methyl parathion have significant lipid solubility, allowing fat storage with delayed toxicity due to late release.3 Delayed toxicity may also occur atypically with other organophosphates, specifically dichlorofenthion and demeton-methyl.4 Many organothiophosphates readily undergo conversion from thions (P=S) to oxons (P=O). Conversion occurs in the environment under the influence of oxygen and light, and in the body, chiefly by the action of liver microsomes. Oxons are much more toxic than thions, but oxons break down more readily. Ultimately, both thions and oxons are hydrolyzed at the ester linkage, yielding alkyl phosphates and leaving groups, both of which are of relatively low toxicity. They are either excreted or further transformed in the body before excretion. The distinction between the different chemical classes becomes important when the physician interprets tests from reference laboratories. This can be espe- cially important when the lab analyzes for the parent compound (i.e., chlorpyrifos in its thiophosphate form) instead of the metabolite form (chlorpyrifos will be completely metabolized to the oxon after the first pass through the liver). Within one or two days of initial organophosphate binding to AChE, some phosphorylated acetylcholinesterase enzyme can be de-phosphorylated (reac- tivated) by the oxime antidote pralidoxime. As time progresses, the enzyme- phosphoryl bond is strengthened by loss of one alkyl group from the phosphoryl adduct, a process called aging. Pralidoxime reactivation is therefore no longer possible after a couple of days,5 although in some cases, improvement has still been seen with pralidoxime administration days after exposure.6 OPIDN: Rarely, certain organophosphates have caused a different kind of neurotoxicity consisting of damage to the afferent fibers of peripheral and cen- tral nerves and associated with inhibition of neuropathy target esterase (NTE). This delayed syndrome has been termed organophosphate-induced delayed neuropathy (OPIDN), and is manifested chiefly by weakness or paralysis and paresthesia of the extremities.7 OPIDN predominantly affects the legs and may 36 ORGANOPHOSPHATES persist for weeks to years. These rare occurrences have been found shortly after an acute and often massive exposure, but in some cases, symptoms have per- sisted for months to years. Only a few of the many organophosphates used as pesticides have been implicated as causes of delayed neuropathy in humans. EPA guidelines require that organophosphate and carbamate compounds which are candidate pesticides be tested in susceptible animal species for this neuro- toxic property. Three epidemiologic studies with an exposed group and a control group also suggest that a proportion
Recommended publications
  • ACEPHATE (Addendum)
    3 ACEPHATE (addendum) First draft prepared by Professor P.K. Gupta 1 and Dr Angelo Moretto 2 1 Rajinder Nagar, Bareilly, UP, India; 2 Dipartimento Medicina Ambientale e Sanità Pubblica, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy Explanation..........................................................................................................3 Evaluation for acceptable daily intake.................................................................4 Biochemical aspects ......................................................................................4 Oral absorption, distribution, excretion and metabolism .......................4 Toxicological studies.....................................................................................5 Acute toxicity.........................................................................................5 Short-term studies of toxicity.................................................................6 Special studies........................................................................................7 Studies on inhibition of cholinesterase activity in vitro ..................7 Short-term study of neurotoxicity ...................................................7 Developmental neurotoxicity..........................................................9 Observations in humans ..............................................................................10 Comments..........................................................................................................12 Toxicological evaluation ...................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Difference Between Pesticides, Insecticides and Herbicides? Pesticide Effects on Food Production
    What is the Difference Between Pesticides, Insecticides and Herbicides? Pesticides are chemicals that may be used to kill fungus, bacteria, insects, plant diseases, snails, slugs, or weeds among others. These chemicals can work by ingestion or by touch and death may occur immediately or over a long period of time. Insecticides are a type of pesticide that is used to specifically target and kill insects. Some insecticides include snail bait, ant killer, and wasp killer. Herbicides are used to kill undesirable plants or “weeds”. Some herbicides will kill all the plants they touch, while others are designed to target one species. Pesticide Effects on Food Production As the human population continues to grow, more and more crops are needed to meet this growing demand. This has increased the use of pesticides to increase crop yield per acre. For example, many farmers will plant a field with Soybeans and apply two doses of Roundup throughout the growing year to remove all other plants and prepare the field for next year’s crop. The Roundup is applied twice through the growing season to kill everything except the soybeans, which are modified to be pesticide resistant. After the soybeans are harvested, there is little vegetative cover on the field creating potential erosion issues for the reason that another crop can easily be planted. With this method, hundreds of gallons of chemicals are introduced into the environment every year. All these chemicals affect wildlife, insects, water quality and air quality. One greatly affected “good” insect are bees. Bees play a significant role in the pollination of the foods that we eat.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Approach to Fast Determination of 64 Pesticides Using of Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) Tomas Kovalczuk, Ondrej Lacina, Martin Jech, Jan Poustka, Jana Hajslova To cite this version: Tomas Kovalczuk, Ondrej Lacina, Martin Jech, Jan Poustka, Jana Hajslova. Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Food Additives and Contaminants, 2008, 25 (04), pp.444-457. 10.1080/02652030701570156. hal-00577414 HAL Id: hal-00577414 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00577414 Submitted on 17 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Food Additives and Contaminants For Peer Review Only Novel approach to fast determination of 64 pesticides using of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) Journal: Food Additives and Contaminants Manuscript ID: TFAC-2007-065.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Research Paper Date Submitted by the 07-Jul-2007 Author: Complete List of Authors:
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • CHLORPYRIFOS 2.5% GRANULAR INSECTICIDE for Professional Use Only
    CHLORPYRIFOS 2.5% GRANULAR INSECTICIDE For professional use only. Not for sale to homeowners. For Control of Various Insects (and Other Arthropods) Infesting Sod Farms, Golf Course Turf, Outdoor Areas around Industrial Plant Sites, and Ornamental Nurseries for Commercial Production Only. Active Ingredient: Chlorpyrifos: O,O-diethyl-0-(3,5,6-trichloro- 2-pyridinyl) phosphorothioate .... 2.5% Other Ingredients ....................... 97.5% Total ............................................ 100.0% FIRST AID ORGANOPHOSPHATE IF SWALLOWED: Call a physician or Poison Control Center. Drink 1 or 2 glasses of water and induce vomiting by touching back of throat with finger, or if available by administering syrup of ipecac. If person is unconscious, do not give anything by mouth and do not induce vomiting. IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water. Get medical attention if irritation persists. IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration, preferably mouth-to-mouth. Get medical attention. IF IN EYES: Flush eyes with plenty of water. Call a physician if irritation persists. FOR CHEMICAL EMERGENCY: Spill, leak, fire, exposure, or accident call CHEMTREC 1-800-424-9300. Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison control center or doctor, or going for treatment. For more information on this product (including health concerns, medical emergencies, or pesticide incidents), call the National Pesticide Information Center at: 1-800-858-7378. NOT TO PHYSICIAN: Chlorpyrifos is a cholinesterase inhibitor. Treat symptomatically. Atropine, only by injection, is the preferable antidote. PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS CAUTION: Harmful if swallowed or absorbed through skin or inhaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of Teresa Homan with Attachments
    Teresa Homan Watertown, SD 57201 I am a landowner in Deuel County, South Dakota. Our land boarders the Deuel Harvest Wind Project in Deuel county, Docket # EL 18-053. There are 112 towers cited in the project, with 9 towers within a mile of our property. We have spent over three decades developing this property to enhance wildlife and for the enjoyment of our family. Can you imagine how we felt when we found we have a population of eastern bluebirds? We have yellow warblers, which by the way feed on the web worms that form in our trees. We have orioles, cedar waxwings, brown thrashers, rose breasted grosbeaks, gold finches, purple finches, robins, blue jays, nuthatches, eastern kingbirds, bitterns, dark eyed juncos, red winged blackbirds, morning doves, owls, cow birds, northern mocking birds, grey cat birds, wood thrushes, tufted titmouse, king fishers, indigo buntings, scarlet tanagers, bobolinks, meadowlarks, many woodpeckers, turkeys, turkey vultures, even humming birds and bald eagles. There are more, just to numerous to list. Many of these birds we have seen for the first time in our lives on this property in the past 1 O years. Not only are these birds beautiful and fun to watch, they have their purpose in the ecosystem. We also see northern long eared bats, that are on the endangered list in South Dakota. These birds are making a come back after the use of insecticides that nearly wiped out many. In the 1940's the insecticide DDT was introduced for public use, it is now banned from sale. In 1976 the herbicide Roundup was introduced to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Properties of Chemicals Volume 2
    1 t ENVIRONMENTAL 1 PROTECTION Esa Nikunen . Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 1 O O O O O O O O OO O OOOOOO Ol OIOOO FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE • EDITA Esa Nikunen e Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 HELSINKI 1000 OlO 00000001 00000000000000000 Th/s is a second revfsed version of Environmental Properties of Chemica/s, published by VAPK-Pub/ishing and Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department as Research Report 91, 1990. The pubiication is also available as a CD ROM version: EnviChem 2.0, a PC database runniny under Windows operating systems. ISBN 951-7-2967-2 (publisher) ISBN 952-7 1-0670-0 (co-publisher) ISSN 1238-8602 Layout: Pikseri Julkaisupalvelut Cover illustration: Jussi Hirvi Edita Ltd. Helsinki 2000 Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 _____ _____________________________________________________ Contents . VOLUME ONE 1 Contents of the report 2 Environmental properties of chemicals 3 Abbreviations and explanations 7 3.1 Ways of exposure 7 3.2 Exposed species 7 3.3 Fffects________________________________ 7 3.4 Length of exposure 7 3.5 Odour thresholds 8 3.6 Toxicity endpoints 9 3.7 Other abbreviations 9 4 Listofexposedspecies 10 4.1 Mammais 10 4.2 Plants 13 4.3 Birds 14 4.4 Insects 17 4.5 Fishes 1$ 4.6 Mollusca 22 4.7 Crustaceans 23 4.8 Algae 24 4.9 Others 25 5 References 27 Index 1 List of chemicals in alphabetical order - 169 Index II List of chemicals in CAS-number order
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a CEN Standardised Method for Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Accurate Mass Spectrometry
    Development of a CEN standardised method for liquid chromatography coupled to accurate mass spectrometry CONTENTS 1. Aim and scope ................................................................................................................. 2 2. Short description ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Apparatus and consumables ......................................................................................... 2 4. Chemicals ........................................................................................................................... 2 5. Procedure ........................................................................................................................... 3 5.1. Sample preparation ................................................................................................... 3 5.2. Recovery experiments for method validation ...................................................... 3 5.3. Extraction method ...................................................................................................... 3 5.4. Measurement .............................................................................................................. 3 5.5. Instrumentation and analytical conditions ............................................................ 4 5.5.1. Dionex Ultimate 3000 .......................................................................................... 4 5.5.2. QExactive Focus HESI source parameters .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Emergency Response Commission
    Florida State Emergency Response Commission Sub-Committee on Training (SOT) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MEDICAL TREATMENT PROTOCOLS Version 3.3 TOXIDROMES Toxidromes are clinical syndromes that the patient presents with. These patterns of signs and symptoms are essential for the successful recognition of chemical exposure. The toxidromes identified in this protocol are chemical exposure based while others such as the opioids are found within general medical protocol. These chemical toxidromes are identified clinically into five syndromes: Irritant Gas Toxidrome Asphyxiant Toxidrome Corrosive Toxidrome Hydrocarbon and Halogenated Hydrocarbons Toxidrome Cholinergic Toxidrome Each can present as a clinical manifestation of the chemical/poisoning involved with some cross-over between toxidromes. This list combines the toxic syndromes found within NFPA 473 (A.5.4.1(2) and traditional syndromes. Toxidrome Correlation to NFPA Standard 473 and Traditional Syndromes Toxidrome NFPA 473 A.5.4.1(2) Hazardous Materials Protocol Correlation Irritant Gas (j) Irritants Bronchospasm OC Pepper spray & lacrimants Asphyxiant (c) Chemical asphyxiants Carbon Monoxide (d) Simple asphyxiants Aniline dyes, Nitriles, Nitrares (h) Blood Agents Cyanide & Hydrogen Sulfide (n) Nitrogen Compounds Closed Space Fires Simple Asphyxants Corrosive (a) Corrosives Hydrofluroic Acid (g) Vesicants Chemical burns to the eye Choramine and Chlorine Hydrocarbon (e) Organic solvents Phenol and (q) Phenolic Compounds Halogenated Hydrocarbons Halogenated Hydrocarbons Cholinergic (b) Pesticides
    [Show full text]
  • The Spruce Budworm, Choristoneura Fumiferana
    02-01370 Spruce Budworm Bro 10/10/02 11:09 AM Page 1 MORE INFORMATION The he spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana For more information on Spruce Budworms call: The Tree Line Spruce (Clemens), is the most destructive and widely (204) 945-7866. Or write: Budworm distributed forest defoliator in North America. Manitoba Conservation Forestry Branch In Manitoba T Forest Health and Ecology The destructive phase of this pest is the larval or caterpillar 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba R3J 3W3 stage. Massive budworm outbreaks occur periodically, Web site: www.gov.mb.ca/natres/forestry/ destroying hundreds of thousands of hectares of valuable fir and spruce. Aerial view of budworm damage In eastern Canada the budworm’s preferred food is balsam fir, Photos courtesy of Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, white spruce and red spruce. In Manitoba, the budworm Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and Northern Forest Research Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. feeds primarily on white spruce and balsam fir, and, less frequently, on black spruce. 02-01370 Spruce Budworm Bro 10/10/02 11:09 AM Page 2 DESCRIPTION OF LIFE STAGES LIFE CYCLE DAMAGE CONTROL The adult moth has a wingspread of The female moth lays In light and moderate infestations Various insecticides are used 21 to 30 mm. It is grey-brown in its eggs in July on the damage is restricted to a partial against the spruce budworm to colour with silvery white patches on underside of needles. loss of new foliage, particularly in protect valuable spruce and fir the forewings. Normally, the eggs the upper crown trees.
    [Show full text]
  • 422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
    Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Site-Selective Protein Modification JUSTIN M
    A “Tag-and-Modify” Approach to Site-Selective Protein Modification JUSTIN M. CHALKER, GONC-ALO J. L. BERNARDES, AND BENJAMIN G. DAVIS* Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Chemistry Research Laboratory, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom RECEIVED ON FEBRUARY 27, 2011 CONSPECTUS ovalent modification can expand a protein's functional capacity. Fluorescent or radioactive labeling, for instance, allows C imaging of a protein in real time. Labeling with an affinity probe enables isolation of target proteins and other interacting molecules. At the other end of this functional spectrum, protein structures can be naturally altered by enzymatic action. ProteinÀprotein interactions, genetic regulation, and a range of cellular processes are under the purview of these post- translational modifications. The ability of protein chemists to install these covalent additions selectively has been critical for elucidating their roles in biology. Frequently the transformations must be applied in a site-specific manner, which demands the most selective chemistry. In this Account, we discuss the development and application of such chemistry in our laboratory. A centerpiece of our strategy is a “tag-and-modify” approach, which entails sequential installation of a uniquely reactive chemical group into the protein (the “tag”) and the selective or specific modification of this group. The chemical tag can be a natural or unnatural amino acid residue. Of the natural residues, cysteine is the most widely used as a tag. Early work in our program focused on selective disulfide formation in the synthesis of glycoproteins. For certain applications, the susceptibility of disulfides to reduction was a limitation and prompted the development of several methods for the synthesis of more stable thioether modifications.
    [Show full text]