DOCSLIB.ORG

The Background and Nature of Temple Mythology in Rabbinic Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Background and Nature of Temple Mythology in Rabbinic Literature Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 1976 The Background and Nature of Temple Mythology in Rabbinic Literature V. George Shillington Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Shillington, V. George, "The Background and Nature of Temple Mythology in Rabbinic Literature" (1976). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1448. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1448 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BACKGROUND AND NATURE OF TEMPLE MYTHOLOGY IN RABBINIC LITERATURE V. George Shillingtcn Thesis presented to the Department of Religion and Culture in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo 1976 L J 0o tf I) UMI Number: EC56376 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. JJML Dissertation Pubiishing UMI EC56376 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. *** ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge the invaluable expertise of his advisor. Professor Robert Fisher of Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo. His incisive analysis of content and style contributed significantly to whatever good qualities the essay may possess. The author also records his indebtedness to the members of the examining committee, including Dean Vallillee and Professors R. Teigen and D. Granskou of W.L.U. Their willingness to read and evaluate the thesis is greatly appreciated. Gratitude is also expressed to Professors Harold Remus of W.L.U. and Benjamin Hubbard of St. Jerome's College, Waterloo, for their helpful consultation. Any errors or shortcomings in the work are wholly the responsibility of the writer. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge the invaluable expertise of his advisor, Professor Robert Fisher of Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo. His incisive analysis of content and style contributed significantly to whatever good qualities the essay may possess. The author also records his indebtedness to the members of the examining committee, including Professors R. Teigan and D. Granskau of W.L.U. and B. Hubbard of St. Jerome's College, Waterloo. Their willingness to read and evaluate the thesis is greatly appreciated. Gratitude is also expressed to Professor Harold Remus of W.L.U. for his help­ ful consultation in some editorial matters. Any errors or shortcomings in the work are wholly the responsibility of the writer. CONTENTS Chapter page I Introduction 1 A. Aim and Scope of the Study 2 B. A Description of Primary Sources Used. 4 C. Myth and History 8 II The Historical Temple of the Jews 13 A. The Foundation: Davidic Contribution. 15 1. The City and The Sanctuary . ~\ ... 15 2. The Altar and the Sacrifices .... 19 B. The First Building: Solomonic Contribu­ tion 21 1. Architecture 21 2. Symbolism 28 C. The Second Building: Post Exilic Contribution 32 1. Conditions Promoting the Restoration of the Temple 32 a) Persian Policy 32 b) Prophetic Impetus 35 2. Function and History of the Temple After Restoration 38 Contents—continued Chapter page D. The Third Building: Herodian Contribu­ tion 43 1. Purpose of Reconstruction 45 2. Size and Beauty 46 3. Popularity and Destruction 49 III The Mythical Temple of the Rabbis 53 A. The Site and the Building 55 1. Microcosm 55 2. Centre of the Earth 58 3. Source of Fertility 61 4. Source of Light 67 5. Light and Water Ritual 69 B. The Furnishings 74 C. Temple Service 81 D. The Celestial Archetype 84 1. Background v . 84 2. Yahweh's Relation to Both Temples. 86 3. The Relation of Both Temples to Each Other 88 IV Factors Involved in the Rise of Temple Mythology 92 Contents—continued Chapter page A. Antecedent Factors 94 1. Homeland Inheritance 94 2. Exilic Analogy 99 a) Ezekiel 99 b) Second Isaiah 106 3. Post-Exilic Prototypes 108 a) Haggai and Zechariah 109 b) Ezra and Nehemiah 112 B. Contemporaneous Factors 116 1. In Palestine 117 a) Aftermath of Destruction .... 117 b) Taxation 120 c) Crop Failure 124 d) Occasions For Rebuilding .... 127 e) Messianism 133 2. In Babylonia 137 a) Migration of the Rabbinate . 138 b) Power Struggle Between Exilarch and Rabbi 145 c) Crises of Sasanian Measures. 152 C. Conclusion 157 V Summary and Conclusions 159 Contents—continued Chapter page A. The Place of the Historical Temple in the Rabbinic Temple of Myth 160 B. Contributing Factors Internal to Judaism. 163 C. Contributing Factors External to Judaism. 166 Bibliography 174 Appendix A 184 Appendix B 185 Appendix C 186 ABBREVIATIONS BASOR Bulletin of American Schools of Oriental Research"! New Haven: The American Schools of Oriental Research. BA Biblical Archaeologist. New Haven: The American Schools of Oriental Research. CBQ Catholic Biblical Quarterly. Washington: The Catholic Biblical Association of America. B.T. The Babylonian Talmud. Mid. R. Midrash Rabbah. M. The Mishnah. JQR The Jewish Quarterly Review, edited by I. Abrahams and C.G. Montefiore. New York: Ktav Publishing House Inc., 1966. JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. IB The Interpreter's Bible. IDB The Interpreter's Dictionary of The Bible. New York: Abingdon Press, 1962. JBL Journal of Biblical Literature. Philadelphia: The Society of Biblical Literature and Exegesis. TDNT A Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1964-1974. JE The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Ktav Publishing House, n.d. EJ Encyclopedia Judaica. Jerusalem: The Mac- Millan Co., 1971-1972. Jos. Wars. Josephus, Wars of the Jews. Jos. Ant. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Biblical References Gen. Genesis Ex. Exodus Lev. Leviticus Num. Numbers Deut. Deuteronomy Josh. Joshua Jud. Judges Sam. Samuel Chron. Chronicles Neh. Nehemiah Ps. Psalms Eccl. Ecclesiastes Is. Isaiah Jer. Jeremiah Lam. Lamentations Ez. Ezekiel Dan. Daniel Hos. Hosea Hag. Haggai Zech. Zechariah CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Rabbinic ideas concerning the Temple of Jerusalem captured the interest of the present writer as he was researching the biblical concept of sacrifice. It was fascinating to discover that the rich symbolism of the Temple in rabbinic thought developed in a period when the Temple did not exist. The presence of the mythical Temple in the liter­ ature of the Rabbis began to raise certain questions: Why did the Jewish leaders of the post-Temple era develop such an elaborate mythology of the Temple? Why did they continue to imagine a cultus which had long since vanished? These questions are compounded by the fact that the Babylonian academies, separated as they were from Palestine, should contribute so significantly to the corporate mythology 2 associated with the Temple of Jerusalem. Especially in J.R. Brown, Temple and Sacrifice in Rabbinic Judaism (Evanston: Seabury Western Theological Seminary, 1963) . 2 Jacob Neusner holds that the Babylonian Jews were more devoted to the Temple and its cult than the Palestinians. The extensive discussion of the Temple in the Babylonian Talmud was later espoused by the Palestinian group. See Neusner's "Foreword" to The Formation of the Babylonian Talmud (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1970), pp. ix-xii, and There We Sat Down (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1972), pp. 19-24"! 1 2 A. Aim and Scope of the Study The purpose of the research is to demonstrate the relationship of the mythical Temple in rabbinic literature both to its historical prototypes and to the conditions with­ in which the myth developed. To accomplish this aim the history of the Temple will be examined to illustrate the backdrop against which the Temple of myth was construed by the Rabbis. Questions will be raised regarding the employ­ ment of mythic elements characteristic of ancient Near Eastern religion. It will be debated whether Israel borrowed and adapted the mythic ideas of her neighbours to suit her own purposes. 3 The central aim of the thesis, however, will focus on the degree to which the political and socio-economic situa­ tions of the rabbinic period contributed to the rise of the mythic interpretations of the Temple. It should also become evident as the discussion progresses that the rich imagery associated with the Temple in rabbinic literature is due 4 largely to the Rabbis* devotion to the Torah. Since the 3 See S.H. Hooke, "The Myth and Ritual Pattern of the Ancient East," S.H. Hooke, ed., Myth and Ritual (London: Oxford University Press, 1933), p. 5. Cf. John Bright, A History of Israel (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972), pp. 155-6. 4 See Jacob Neusner, A History of the Jews in Babylonia, The Parthian Period, Vol. I (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1969) , pp. 145-174. "The school . embodied the central myth of Pharisaic-Rabbinical Judaism, the belief that the Mosaic Scriptures constituted divine revelation in written form. The 'whole Torah' consisted of both written and oral 3 Temple cult was prescribed by Torah, the Rabbis had to justify Jewish life without the Temple. They did so by rationalization and imaginative explanation. This explana­ tion, instead of diminishing the Temple's significant place in Judaism, greatly enlarged its mythological dimension. The scope of the study is circumscribed by an intentional concentration on rabbinic materials and the events of the period within which they were written, A.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Bibliographic References to Talmudic Literature
    H-Judaic Internet Resource: Index of Bibliographic References to Talmudic Literature Discussion published by Moshe Feifer on Thursday, March 19, 2015 THE SAUL LIEBERMAN INSTITUTE OF TALMUDIC RESEARCH THE JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY The Index of Bibliographic References to Talmudic Literature We are pleased to announce that the Lieberman Institute'sIndex of References Dealing with Talmudic Literature is available at http://lieberman-index.org. Introduction What is the Index? The Index is a comprehensive online research tool directing the user to discussions and interpretations of Talmudic passages found in both modern academic research and medieval Talmudic scholarship (Geonim and Rishonim). By clicking any Talmudic passage, the user will receive a list of specific books and page numbers within them discussing the selected passage. The Index is revolutionizing Talmudic research by supplying scholars with quick and easy access to pertinent information. Preceding the establishment of the index project, the task of finding specific bibliographical references that today takes minutes would take many hours or even days of work. The Index radically alters old methods of bibliographical searching and brings Talmudic research up to par with contemporary standards. In addition to those involved in Talmudic studies per se, the index is a vital aid to those engaged in all Judaic, ancient near east, or comparative religion studies to the extent that they relate at times to Talmudic texts. Thus, the database already makes an extremely significant contribution to all associated fields of research and study by enabling scholars, students or lay audience to quickly and comprehensively access relevant scholarship. Description Citation: Moshe Feifer.
    [Show full text]
  • By Tamar Kadari* Abstract Julius Theodor (1849–1923)
    By Tamar Kadari* Abstract This article is a biography of the prominent scholar of Aggadic literature, Rabbi Dr Julius Theodor (1849–1923). It describes Theodor’s childhood and family and his formative years spent studying at the Breslau Rabbinical Seminary. It explores the thirty one years he served as a rabbi in the town of Bojanowo, and his final years in Berlin. The article highlights The- odor’s research and includes a list of his publications. Specifically, it focuses on his monumental, pioneering work preparing a critical edition of Bereshit Rabbah (completed by Chanoch Albeck), a project which has left a deep imprint on Aggadic research to this day. Der folgende Artikel beinhaltet eine Biographie des bedeutenden Erforschers der aggadischen Literatur Rabbiner Dr. Julius Theodor (1849–1923). Er beschreibt Theodors Kindheit und Familie und die ihn prägenden Jahre des Studiums am Breslauer Rabbinerseminar. Er schil- dert die einunddreissig Jahre, die er als Rabbiner in der Stadt Bojanowo wirkte, und seine letzten Jahre in Berlin. Besonders eingegangen wird auf Theodors Forschungsleistung, die nicht zuletzt an der angefügten Liste seiner Veröffentlichungen ablesbar ist. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei seine präzedenzlose monumentale kritische Edition des Midrasch Bereshit Rabbah (die Chanoch Albeck weitergeführt und abgeschlossen hat), ein Werk, das in der Erforschung aggadischer Literatur bis heute nachwirkende Spuren hinterlassen hat. Julius Theodor (1849–1923) is one of the leading experts of the Aggadic literature. His major work, a scholarly edition of the Midrash Bereshit Rabbah (BerR), completed by Chanoch Albeck (1890–1972), is a milestone and foundation of Jewish studies research. His important articles deal with key topics still relevant to Midrashic research even today.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc Hirshman
    THE TIKVAH CENTER FOR LAW & JEWISH CIVILIZATION Professor Moshe Halbertal Professor J.H.H. Weiler Directors of The Tikvah Center Tikvah Working Paper 07/12 Marc Hirshman Individual and Group Learning in Rabbinic Literature: Some Key Terms NYU School of Law • New York, NY 10011 The Tikvah Center Working Paper Series can be found at http://www.nyutikvah.org/publications.html All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. ISSN 2160‐8229 (print) ISSN 2160‐8253 (online) Copy Editor: Danielle Leeds Kim © Marc Hirshman 2012 New York University School of Law New York, NY 10011 USA Publications in the Series should be cited as: AUTHOR, TITLE, TIKVAH CENTER WORKING PAPER NO./YEAR [URL] Individual and Group Learning in Rabbinic Literature INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP LEARNING IN RABBINIC LITERATURE: SOME KEY TERMS By Marc Hirshman A. Foundations of Education in Biblical and Second Temple Times Wilhelm Bacher, the great late 19th, early 20th scholar, published in 1903 a wonderful essay entitled " Das altjüdische Schulewesen", in which he declared Nehemiah 8, 1-8, which describes the public reading of scripture, " der Geburtstag des altjüdischen Schulweis". From that day on 1 Tishre 445 b.c.e, Bacher would have it, the public recitation of Torah and its teaching would become central to second Temple Judaism, and its rabbinic heirs in the first five centuries of the common era. Indeed, Ezra's commission from Artaxerxes includes appointments of "judges and magistrates to judge all the people… and to teach…" (Ezra 7, 25). This close connection between the judicial system and the educational system also characterizes the rabbinic period, succinctly captured in the opening quote of the tractate of Avot 1,1.
    [Show full text]
  • When Rabbi Eliezer Was Arrested for Heresy
    JSIJ 10 (2012) 145-181 WHEN RABBI ELIEZER WAS ARRESTED FOR HERESY JOSHUA SCHWARTZ and PETER J. TOMSON Introduction: A Shared History This study is part of a larger project the ultimate aim of which is to write a shared, twin or intertwined history of Jews and Christians in the first and second centuries CE. The first stage of the project will be to select relevant sources, to describe their literary and historical characteristics, and to read and reread them in view of their significance vis-à-vis other sources. The second stage will encompass the writing of a historical synthesis of the shared history. We stress the shared aspect of the history because Judaism and Christianity in the ancient world are usually studied separately, as though involving not just two distinct histories, but also two separate sets of sources, two frameworks of interpretation and reflection, two programs of academic teaching, research, and writing, and two canons of judgment and review. While Jewish and Christian history can be considered separately in the Middle Ages and later, including modern times, this is not the case for Antiquity, and particularly not regarding the first two centuries CE, before what is known as the “parting of the ways.” Although there was some movement toward separation during the first two centuries CE, as evinced, for instance, in such sources as the Didache, the Gospel of Matthew, and the Epistle of Barnabas, 1 this was by no means a “parting of the ways” and certainly does not justify separating the history of early Christianity from Jewish history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Mirror: Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha
    The Greatest Mirror Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha Andrei A. Orlov On the cover: The Baleful Head, by Edward Burne-Jones. Oil on canvas, dated 1886– 1887. Courtesy of Art Resource. Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2017 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu Production, Dana Foote Marketing, Fran Keneston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Orlov, Andrei A., 1960– author. Title: The greatest mirror : heavenly counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha / Andrei A. Orlov. Description: Albany, New York : State University of New York Press, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016052228 (print) | LCCN 2016053193 (ebook) | ISBN 9781438466910 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781438466927 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Apocryphal books (Old Testament)—Criticism, interpretation, etc. Classification: LCC BS1700 .O775 2017 (print) | LCC BS1700 (ebook) | DDC 229/.9106—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016052228 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For April DeConick . in the season when my body was completed in its maturity, there imme- diately flew down and appeared before me that most beautiful and greatest mirror-image of myself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Name of God the Golem Legend and the Demiurgic Role of the Alphabet 243
    CHAPTER FIVE The Name of God The Golem Legend and the Demiurgic Role of the Alphabet Since Samaritanism must be viewed within the wider phenomenon of the Jewish religion, it will be pertinent to present material from Judaism proper which is corroborative to the thesis of the present work. In this Chapter, the idea about the agency of the Name of God in the creation process will be expounded; then, in the next Chapter, the various traditions about the Angel of the Lord which are relevant to this topic will be set forth. An apt introduction to the Jewish teaching about the Divine Name as the instrument of the creation is the so-called golem legend. It is not too well known that the greatest feat to which the Jewish magician aspired actually was that of duplicating God's making of man, the crown of the creation. In the Middle Ages, Jewish esotericism developed a great cycle of golem legends, according to which the able magician was believed to be successful in creating a o ?� (o?u)1. But the word as well as the concept is far older. Rabbinic sources call Adam agolem before he is given the soul: In the first hour [of the sixth day], his dust was gathered; in the second, it was kneaded into a golem; in the third, his limbs were shaped; in the fourth, a soul was irifused into him; in the fifth, he arose and stood on his feet[ ...]. (Sanh. 38b) In 1615, Zalman �evi of Aufenhausen published his reply (Jii.discher Theriak) to the animadversions of the apostate Samuel Friedrich Brenz (in his book Schlangenbalg) against the Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tree in the Garden
    MAIER BECKER A Tree in the Garden The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge are one and the same tree. When the verse states ‘God caused to sprout the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge’ (Gen. 2:9) it should be understood to mean, God caused to 1 sprout the Tree of Life which is also the Tree of Knowledge . R. J OSEPH KIMHI THIS COMMENT SEEMS to fly in the face of the basic details of the creation story in the Bible. In fact, it appears to contradict outright an explicit Biblical verse where God says “now (that man has eaten from the Tree of Knowledge), lest he partake from the Tree of Life as well” (3:22). 2 If the trees are one and the same, then by eating from the Tree of Knowledge man had already partaken of the Tree of Life! This essay proposes a reading of the Genesis story which provides a textual and conceptual basis for R. Kimhi’s explication, based on midrashic sources. I will suggest that R. Kimhi’s com - mentary sheds light on fundamental issues relating to man’s mortality and his relationship with God. 3 The Textual Starting Point The Bible introduces the Tree of Life stating; “God caused to sprout from the ground every tree that was pleasing to the sight and the Tree of Life betokh— within, the garden” (2:9). The text could have simply stated “the Tree of Life bagan —in the garden.” What does the word betokh , come to add? Onkelos translates the word betokh in this verse to mean bemitsiut— in the middle of the garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Manuscripts in the Roth Collection’, Contributed by Cecil Roth Himself to the Alexander Marx Jubilee Volume (New York, 1950), Where It Forms Pp
    Handlist 164 LEEDS UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Provisional handlist of manuscripts in the Roth Collection Introduction Dr Cecil Roth (1899-1970), the Jewish historian, was born on 5 March 1899 in Dalston, London, the youngest of the four sons of Joseph and Etty Roth. Educated at the City of London School, he saw active service in France in 1918 and then read history at Merton College, Oxford, obtaining a first class degree in modern history in 1922, and a DPhil in 1924; his thesis was published in 1925 as The Last Florentine Republic. In 1928 he married Irene Rosalind Davis. They had no children. Roth soon turned to Jewish studies, his interest from childhood, when he had a traditional religious education and learned Hebrew from the Cairo Genizah scholar Jacob Mann. He supported himself by freelance writing until in 1939 he received a specially created readership in post-biblical Jewish studies at the University of Oxford, where he taught until his retirement in 1964. He then settled in Israel and divided his last years between New York, where he was visiting professor at Queens’ College in City University and Stern College, and Jerusalem. He died in Jerusalem on 21 June 1970. Roth’s literary output was immense, ranging from definitive histories of the Jews both globally and in several particular countries, to bibliographical works, studies of painting, scholarly research, notably on the Dead Sea scrolls, and biographical works. But his crowning achievement was the editorship of the Encyclopaedia Judaica, which appeared in the year of his death. Throughout his life Roth collected both books and manuscripts, and art objects.
    [Show full text]
  • אוסף מרמורשטיין the Marmorstein Collection
    אוסף מרמורשטיין The Marmorstein Collection Brad Sabin Hill THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Manchester 2017 1 The Marmorstein Collection CONTENTS Acknowledgements Note on Bibliographic Citations I. Preface: Hebraica and Judaica in the Rylands -Hebrew and Samaritan Manuscripts: Crawford, Gaster -Printed Books: Spencer Incunabula; Abramsky Haskalah Collection; Teltscher Collection; Miscellaneous Collections; Marmorstein Collection II. Dr Arthur Marmorstein and His Library -Life and Writings of a Scholar and Bibliographer -A Rabbinic Literary Family: Antecedents and Relations -Marmorstein’s Library III. Hebraica -Literary Periods and Subjects -History of Hebrew Printing -Hebrew Printed Books in the Marmorstein Collection --16th century --17th century --18th century --19th century --20th century -Art of the Hebrew Book -Jewish Languages (Aramaic, Judeo-Arabic, Yiddish, Others) IV. Non-Hebraica -Greek and Latin -German -Anglo-Judaica -Hungarian -French and Italian -Other Languages 2 V. Genres and Subjects Hebraica and Judaica -Bible, Commentaries, Homiletics -Mishnah, Talmud, Midrash, Rabbinic Literature -Responsa -Law Codes and Custumals -Philosophy and Ethics -Kabbalah and Mysticism -Liturgy and Liturgical Poetry -Sephardic, Oriental, Non-Ashkenazic Literature -Sects, Branches, Movements -Sex, Marital Laws, Women -History and Geography -Belles-Lettres -Sciences, Mathematics, Medicine -Philology and Lexicography -Christian Hebraism -Jewish-Christian and Jewish-Muslim Relations -Jewish and non-Jewish Intercultural Influences
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Intertestamental and Early Rabbinic Literature: an Annotated Bibliographic Resource Updated (Part 1)
    JETS 55/2 (2012) 235–72 JEWISH INTERTESTAMENTAL AND EARLY RABBINIC LITERATURE: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIC RESOURCE UPDATED (PART 1) DAVID W. CHAPMAN AND ANDREAS J. KÖSTENBERGER* Twelve years ago we published a bibliography that is now due for a substantial update. 1 The field of Jewish literature can be mystifying to the non- specialist. The initial obstacle often is where to go for texts, translations, concordances, and bibliography. Even many researchers more familiar with these materials often fail to take advantage of the best critical texts, translations, and helps currently available. The goal of this article is to summarize in a single location the principal texts, translations, and foundational resources for the examination of the central Jewish literature potentially pertinent to the background study of early Christianity. Generally, the procedure followed for each Jewish writing is to list the most important works in the categories of: bibliography, critical text, translation, concordance/index, lexical or grammatical aides, introduction, and commentary. Where deemed helpful, more than one work may be included. English translations, introductions, and helps are generally preferred. Most entries are listed alphabetically by author, but bibliographies and texts are typically listed in reverse chronological order from date of publication. Also provided in many instances are the language(s) of extant manuscripts and the likely dates of composition reflecting the current scholarly consensus. While the emphasis is on printed editions, some computer-based resources are noted. Many older printed texts have been scanned and are now available online; we will note when these appear on http://archive.org (often links can also be found through http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu or http://books.google.com).
    [Show full text]
  • A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story
    A WHITEHEADIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOHARIC CREATION STORY by Michael Gold A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May 2016 Copyright 2016 by Michael Gold ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to his committee members, Professors Marina Banchetti, Frederick E. Greenspahn, Kristen Lindbeck, and Eitan Fishbane for their encouragement and support throughout this project. iv ABSTRACT Author: Michael Gold Title: A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story Institution: Florida Atlantic University Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Marina P. Banchetti Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Year: 2016 This dissertation presents a Whiteheadian interpretation of the notions of mind, immanence and process as they are addressed in the Zohar. According to many scholars, this kabbalistic creation story as portrayed in the Zohar is a reaction to the earlier rabbinic concept of God qua creator, which emphasized divine transcendence over divine immanence. The medieval Jewish philosophers, particularly Maimonides influenced by Aristotle, placed particular emphasis on divine transcendence, seeing a radical separation between Creator and creation. With this in mind, these scholars claim that one of the goals of the Zohar’s creation story was to emphasize God’s immanence within creation. Similar to the Zohar, the process metaphysics of Alfred North Whitehead and his followers was reacting to the substance metaphysics that had dominated Western philosophy as far back as ancient Greek thought. Whitehead adopts a very similar narrative to that of the Zohar.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There an Authentic Triennial Cycle of Torah Readings? RABBI LIONEL E
    Is there an Authentic Triennial Cycle of Torah Readings? RABBI LIONEL E. MOSES This paper is an appendix to the paper "Annual and Triennial Systems For Reading The Torah" by Rabbi Elliot Dorff, and was approved together with it on April 29, 1987 by a vote of seven in favor, four opposed, and two abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Isidoro Aizenberg, Ben Zion Bergman, Elliot N. Dorff, Richard L. Eisenberg, Mayer E. Rabinowitz, Seymour Siegel and Gordon Tucker. Members voting in opposition: Rabbis David H. Lincoln, Lionel E. Moses, Joel Roth and Steven Saltzman. Members abstaining: Rabbis David M. Feldman and George Pollak. Abstract In light of questions addressed to the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards from as early as 1961 and the preliminary answers given to these queries by the committee (Section I), this paper endeavors to review the sources (Section II), both talmudic and post-talmudic (Section Ila) and manuscript lists of sedarim (Section lib) to set the triennial cycle in its historical perspective. Section III of the paper establishes a list of seven halakhic parameters, based on Mishnah and Tosefta,for the reading of the Torah. The parameters are limited to these two authentically Palestinian sources because all data for a triennial cycle is Palestinian in origin and predates even the earliest post-Geonic law codices. It would thus be unfair, to say nothing of impossible, to try to fit a Palestinian triennial reading cycle to halakhic parameters which were both later in origin and developed outside its geographical sphere of influence. Finally in Section IV, six questions are asked regarding the institution of a triennial cycle in our day and in a short postscript, several desiderata are listed in order to put such a cycle into practice today.
    [Show full text]