Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Final Report Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Final Report Prepared by: GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd for City of Canada Bay Council on 20/08/19 Reference: N161710 Issue #: Final Local Movement Strategy City of Canada Bay Final Report Client: City of Canada Bay Council on 20/08/19 Reference: N161710 Issue #: Final Quality Record Issue Date Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By Signed Volker Buhl, Zara Abbasi, A-Dr 15/05/19 Draft Report Nick Buchanan Steve Enticott Okka Maw, John Devney Final 20/08/19 Final Report Zara Abbasi Nick Buchanan Nick Buchanan © GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd) 2018 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property Melbourne | Sydney | Brisbane contained in this document remains the property of GTA Consultants. GTA Report Adelaide | Perth CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction and Background 2 1.2. Scope 2 1.3. Study Area 2 2. Policy Context 3 2.1. Policies and Strategic Context 4 2.2. Vision and Objectives 9 3. Land Use and Transport Context 11 3.1. Land Use 12 3.2. Population, Employment and Demographics 12 3.3. Travel Patterns and Demand 14 4. Existing Travel Networks 17 4.1. Active Transport Network 18 4.2. Public Transport Network 20 4.3. Road Network 28 4.4. Freight 33 4.5. Road Safety 34 4.6. Parking 38 5. Future Transport Network Changes 39 5.1. Committed and Planned Transport Projects 40 5.2. Future Issues and Opportunities 44 6. Future Demographic and Travel Pattern Changes 52 6.1. Future Population and Employment 53 6.2. Assessment of Travel Pattern Changes 54 6.3. Emerging Transport Trends 59 6.4. Implications 61 7. Actions 62 7.1. Overview 63 7.2. Active Transport 63 7.3. Public Transport 67 7.4. Road Network 72 7.5. Travel Demand Management 78 7.6. Land Use 80 N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay Figures Figure 1.1: Canada Bay Transport Network Overview 2 Figure 2.1: Map of Precincts within the Parramatta Road Corridor 6 Figure 2.2: Overview of sub regional transport projects 8 Figure 3.1: Population and employment growth 12 Figure 3.2: Current Forecast Population Growth (2016 to 2036) 13 Figure 3.3: Current Forecast Employment Growth (2016 to 2036) 14 Figure 3.4: Mode Share for all trips in Canada Bay LGA 15 Figure 3.5: Percentage of Residential Location of local Workers, 2016 16 Figure 3.6: Trip Purpose for Canada Bay 16 Figure 4.1: Walking catchments for centres within the City of Canada Bay 19 Figure 4.2: Cycling catchment within City of Canada Bay 20 Figure 4.3: Bus network within City of Canada Bay LGA 21 Figure 4.4: AM Peak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 22 Figure 4.5: Interpeak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 23 Figure 4.6: PM Peak Hour Bus Services by Bus Stop 24 Figure 4.7: Peak Train Load for the T1 Line (estimate load factor at Redfern) 25 Figure 4.8: Bus and Rail Boarding 26 Figure 4.9: Bus and Rail Alighting 27 Figure 4.10: 30 Minute Public Transport Accessibility to Drummoyne 28 Figure 4.11: Road Hierarchy 29 Figure 4.12: 2016 AM 2 hour peak period road volumes 30 Figure 4.13: 2016 PM 2 hour peak period road volumes 31 Figure 4.14: 30 Minute Driving Accessibility to Rhodes 32 Figure 4.15: B-double routes within Canada Bay LGA 33 Figure 4.16: Rear loading and servicing for small businesses 34 Figure 4.17: Loading docks for larger shopping centres and supermarkets 34 Figure 4.19: Intersection Pedestrian Crash Density 36 Figure 4.20: Intersection Risk Rating 37 Figure 5.1: WestConnex 40 Figure 5.2: M4 East 41 Figure 5.3: Sydney Metro West Key Station Precincts 43 Figure 5.4: Parramatta Light Rail stage 1 and 2 43 Figure 5.5: Parramatta River Ferry Route: Proposed ferry wharf at Rhodes 44 Figure 5.6: Issues and opportunities for active transport (Walking and Cycling) 46 Figure 5.7: Issues and opportunities on public transport 49 Figure 5.8: Issues and opportunities on road networks 50 Figure 5.9: Issues and opportunities summary 51 Figure 6.1: Distribution of population growth to 2036 53 Figure 6.2: Distribution of employment growth to 2036 54 Figure 6.3: Existing travel modes (2016) 55 Figure 6.4: Travel mode by trip purpose (2016) 55 N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay Figure 6.5: Origin-destination pairs to other LGAs (2016) 56 Figure 6.6: Future travel modes (2026 Project Case) 56 Figure 6.7: Travel mode by trip purpose (2026 Project Case) 57 Figure 6.8: Future travel modes (2036 Project Case) 57 Figure 6.9: Travel mode by trip purpose (2036 Project Case) 58 Figure 6.10: Origin-destination pairs to other LGAs (2016-2036) 58 Figure 6.11: GTA Assessment tool for future trends 59 Figure 7.1: Local Movement Strategy Process 63 Figure 7.2: Canada Bay strategic bicycle map 64 Figure 7.3: Active Transport Actions 65 Figure 7.4: Public Transport Actions 69 Figure 7.5: Movement and Place street type definitions 73 Figure 7.6: Movement and place methodology 74 Figure 7.7: Proposed Future Movement and Place for Canada Bay 74 Figure 7.8: Road Network Actions 75 Tables Table 2.1: Summary Results for Homebush, Burwood and Kings Bay Precincts 7 Table 4.1: Bus Frequencies at select locations 22 Table 4.2: Key State and Regional Roads 29 Table 4.3: 2016 Volume-capacity ratios throughout City of Canada Bay 32 Table 4.4: Summary of Crashes and Casualties from 2013 to 2017 35 Table 4.5: Trends of crashes and casualties from 2013 to 2017 36 Table 5.1: Future Key Transport Projects 40 Table 5.2: Issues and opportunities related to walking across Canada Bay LGA 45 Table 5.3: Issues and opportunities related to cycling across Canada Bay LGA 45 Table 5.4: Issues and opportunities related to the bus network & services across Canada Bay LGA 47 Table 5.5: Issues and opportunities related to the ferry network & services on Parramatta River 48 Table 5.6: Issues and opportunities related to the rail network & services across Canada Bay LGA 48 Table 5.7: Issues and opportunities related to the road network across Canada Bay LGA 49 Table 5.8: Issues and opportunities related to freight across Canada Bay LGA 50 Table 5.9: Issues and opportunities related to parking across Canada Bay LGA 50 Table 6.1: Preliminary Outcomes for Canada Bay (2036) 60 Table 6.2: Canada Bay Mode Share Targets (2026 and 2036) 61 N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 01 N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introduction and Background GTA Consultants (GTA) has been commissioned by the City of Canada Bay Council (Council) to prepare a Local Movement Strategy and Action Plan (LMS). Recent amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) require Council to review and amend the Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan (LEP) as soon as practicable, to address the requirements in the Eastern City District Plan. Council is intending to amend the LEP within two years. The Act also requires Council to undertake the review in a strategic manner, by developing a Local Strategic Planning Statement that will set out t he community’s 20-year vision for land-use in the local area (as also expressed in Council’s Community Strategic Plan) and how change will be managed into the future. 1.2. Scope This report provides an overview of the existing transport situation, relevant transport opportunities and constraints, future transport and land use trends and changes. It also presents a series of actions per travel mode that support overarching strategic objectives across the Canada Bay Local Government Area (LGA). 1.3. Study Area Figure 1.1 illustrates the study area for this report, which is the entire City of Canada Bay Council LGA. It includes major roads on the boundaries (such as Parramatta Road) and train stations such as Strathfield. Figure 1.1: Canada Bay Transport Network Overview N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 2 POLICY CONTEXT 2. POLICY CONTEXT 02 N161710 // 20/08/19 Final Report // Issue: Final Local Movement Strategy, City of Canada Bay 3 POLICY CONTEXT 2.1. Policies and Strategic Context Introduction This section of the report summarises the major planning policies and strategies that influence the development of a n LMS for the City of Canada Bay. A Metropolis of Three Cities -The Greater Sydney Region Plan A Metropolis of Three Cities -The Greater Sydney Region Plan is a State Government report that establishes a 40-year strategic land use plan for Sydney. The plan was developed concurrently with Future Transport Strategy 2056 prepared by Transport for NSW, which aims to deliver better connectivity and accessibility for the residents of Greater Sydney.
Recommended publications
  • Map of the Division of Reid
    REID S wa in Campbell es C Park re B e EA k 151°10'E C M ON HART OO D LA S AN M Lowanna F AR L O IE H D S VE O S OOLAROO Park Coolaroo P L A L C D S T E D N E T I R Park Chatswood FARRAN E ST D F T WILLOUGHBY Y E T Athletic S V R A D Park HA E W 151°9'E MPL K MOWBRAY RD W Y R LANE COVEMOWBRAY L AL RD W W T MA Lane RD DA H G S DA DRA LA T T LA N MINDARIE ST G D CA Cove N S NORTH OR R D MOW R E A BRAY O E C T ON T R P O L CR N P V S ES S R National I E L eek A NG T I r UNN C T L T RD rk N T A E A ba A y S M L W MURRAY S Park g O P D rin P R E St Upper A 151°8'E C A Batten T N E Lower ROSLYN CE I R I ST ON E T Stringybark C D Y S A G Y V re P Stringybark MURRA L A T ek MER SOURCESCreek Lower Stringybark V A N C R W O E E Creek S RD OX A R RT H D Reserve Creek E THIRD AVE O S D AT Stringybark K M T R CA Reserve Stringybark O T L RES O RF a A C Creek Reserve T K N N S E N T AVE r NB Reserve S E OR E A T l R N A P D T HA i ORIO C TON LL S n HNS RI RD N A P W OV JO Reserve H K E R S F Y W E T G E L s Batten T M T L O T L S I O A O E RR S N IZ N H L RD O S N A G W TU E I M AB T K G H Magdala RE E R E Creek N L P B AR D 151°7'E N A E D S R E A KL S R This map has been compiled Nby Spatial Vision from data supplied by the AustralianAND H L CLE T E L ST Park E A NUNDA U H L ER O D O AD S T D D S Tantallon O R Reserve P RD Z A S O Pryor D G T Y A W A I S G Y VE R R N N T T O P I V D T S R K A T Electoral Commission, Geoscience Australia, DepartmentL ofT the Environment, Water, HANCOTT ST R U R O K A T T IN Park E S D E S D F S S E B M D Park i E W V R P Wallumatta tt PAG S G R N U CL G L y E T ARA A U s ER LAND K C N F S Heritage andLD the Arts andB PitneyRD Bowes Business Insight.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Parks, Urban Icons? the Case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney
    U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 505 Urban Parks, Urban Icons? The case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney Catherine Evans Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW [email protected] This paper explores the question of how urban parks function as urban icons. It examines Bicentennial Park in Homebush Bay, 12 km west of the Sydney Central Business District (CBD) as a case study. Bicentennial Park was planned and designed between 1983 and 1988, a time when Australia, and its cities in particular, grappled with tensions between celebrating achievements of two hundred years of European settlement and redressing the cultural and ecological harm wrought by those achievements. The research focuses on a review of material related to the design and promotion of the park, and early reviews of the park. The discussion explores the influence of specific ideas about the city and ecology on the transformations of use, materiality, and physical form of the land that became Bicentennial Park. Findings reveal that Bicentennial Park at Homebush Bay was conceived as an awkwardly scripted design, which in turn reflects a convergence of urban planning initiatives, intensifying environmental awareness and ideological tensions within the then nascent Australian- based profession of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Meeting Meeting Held on 28/09/2020
    Preface The NSW Government is committed to delivering a reformed infrastructure contributions system that achieves greater certainty, transparency, efficiency, and fairness in infrastructure funding and delivery in New South Wales. On 15 April 2020, I was appointed by the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces to undertake a comprehensive review of the infrastructure contributions system in New South Wales (the Review). This follows the Premier’s announcement in November 2019 that the Government would progress planning reforms to: 1. Cut red tape, increase transparency, reduce assessment timeframes and make e-planning mandatory for metro councils 2. Supercharge new hubs across New South Wales to ensure people can live in communities close to their work 3. Fix the uncertainty of developer contributions to boost investment, and 4. Preserve our heritage, create beautiful new public planes, and promote good design. As part of the Review’s Terms of Reference, I was tasked with reviewing and making recommendations to deliver an infrastructure contributions system that: ▪ delivers the public infrastructure required to support development in New South Wales ▪ achieves greater certainty, transparency, efficiency and fairness in the setting of infrastructure contributions ▪ identifies legislative regulatory changes necessary to implement the proposed reforms. During May and June 2020, I heard from some peak stakeholder groups and this helped me better understand the issues in the current infrastructure contributions system and shape the discussion in the Issues Paper. This Issues Paper is not NSW Government policy, but rather a broad summary of key issues with the existing system. It is designed to support community feedback on how we can best address these issues and ask questions that will inform broad reform directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gladesville Bridge
    Gladesville Bridge – 50th Anniversary Ken Maxwell – Associate Technical Director, Bridges Hyder Consulting, Sydney Gladesville Bridge – Opened 2nd October 1964 Outline of Presentation • Old Gladesville Bridge. • Early concept design options for replacement bridge. • DMR tender design. • Accepted alternative design. • Arch falsework. • Arch design. • Arch construction. • Approach spans – design and construction. • Heritage recognition. • Opening ceremony. Gladesville Bridge – Parramatta River Old Gladesville Bridge • Constructed 1878 to 1881. • Wrought iron lattice girder spans. • Swing span for navigation purposes. Old Gladesville Bridge (approximate location) 1956 1881 Reasons for New Gladesville Bridge • New bridge originally intended to be part of Sydney’s North Western Expressway (road linking Sydney City to the northern suburbs and through to Newcastle). • Earlier bridge’s useful service life exceeded. • Only two-lane traffic capacity – ‘bottleneck’ to traffic flow. • Swing span – abrupt interference to traffic flow. • North Western Expressway project was abandoned in the 1970s due to protests about the freeway's projected route through inner city suburbs such as Glebe and Annandale. Early Concept Designs • Concept designs developed by DMR’s Bridge Section, headed by Design Engineer Cliff Robertson (one of John Bradfield’s senior assistants on Sydney Harbour Bridge). • Bridge Section of DMR included a number of other highly-respected bridge engineers during this period, namely Vladimir Karmalsky, Albert Fried and Brian Pearson. DMR Tender Design – Steel Cantilever Bridge Tender Process • 1957 – tenders invited by Department of Main Roads (DMR), based on steel cantilever bridge, but alternative designs permitted (tenders closed October 1957). • Four (4) companies tendered for the steel design. • Tenders ranged from £2.51 M to £3.87 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Project Submissions
    M4 Extension M4 PART 3: INITIAL PROJECT SUBMISSIONS M4 Extension NSW GOVERNMENT SUBMISSION TO INFRASTRUCTURE AUSTRALIA TEMPLATE FOR SUMMARIES OF FURTHER PRIORITY PROJECTS JULY 2010 Project Summary (2 pages, excluding attachments) Initiative Name: M4 Extension Location (State/Region(or City)/ Locality): Sydney, NSW Name of Proponent Entity: Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW Contact (Name, Position, phone/e-mail): Paul Goldsmith General Manager, Motorway Projects Phone: 8588 5710 or 0413 368 241 [email protected] Project Description: • Provide a description of the initiative and the capability it will provide. The description needs to provide a concise, but clear description of the initiative’s scope. (approx 3 paragraphs) A motorway connection, mainly in tunnel, from the eastern end of the Western Freeway (M4) at North Strathfield to the western outskirts of the Sydney CBD and the road network near Sydney Airport. It would link M4 to the eastern section of the Sydney Orbital via the Cross City Tunnel and Sydney Harbour Bridge. The eastern section of the M4 (east of Parramatta) would be widened/upgraded. A twin tube tunnel is proposed from North Strathfield to just south of Campbell Road at St Peters with connections to the City West Link at Lilyfield/Rozelle and Parramatta Road/Broadway at Glebe/ Chippendale. A bus only connection at Parramatta Road, Haberfield is also possible. A further tunnel is proposed to connect Victoria Road near Gladesville Bridge to the main tunnel in the Leichhardt area. There is a proposed surface motorway link from just south of Campbell Road to the road network around Sydney Airport probably connecting to Canal Road and Qantas Drive (the latter subject to M5 East Expansion planning and Sydney Airport Corp Ltd agreement) with a potential link to M5 at Arncliffe.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange Improvement Case Reference: TR010030 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government) pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 January 2018 [This page has been intentionally left blank] 2 Scoping Opinion for M25 Junction 10/A3 Wisley Interchange CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................. 5 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation ........................................ 7 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union ..................................... 7 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 8 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ....................................... 8 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ........................................... 9 3. EIA APPROACH ................................................................................ 13 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................. 13 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs) .................................. 13 3.3 Scope of Assessment .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parramatta River
    anchorage anchorage ail far enough along the Parramatta River held at Homebush Bay in 2000, there has wetlands, vast stretches of open space, sailing Sand you can’t fail to notice a broken white been a dramatic rise in activity on the river. and rowing clubs, unit blocks and posh parramatta column mounted on a rock near the water’s On any given day, it bustles with yachts and waterfront mansions. Yaralla House, in Concord edge at Henley. powerboats, tinnies, canoes, kayaks and (pictured here) is one of the oldest and largest This simple monument is dedicated to the RiverCat ferries (seven low-wash catamarans and has considerable historical significance. short but spectacular life of Henry Searle, one of named after famous Australian sportswomen). There are four islands along the river: Australia’s greatest scullers, who died in 1889 at The river, which is tidal to Charles Street Rodd Island in Iron Cove, and Cockatoo, just 23. The column also marks the finish line Weir at Parramatta, is jam-packed with things to Spectacle and Snapper islands huddled between where, a year earlier, Searle comprehensively see – if you know what to look for. Woolwich and Birchgrove. In the late 19th defeated the world rowing champion. century, Rodd Island was used as a biological Searle’s Monument is one of the landmarks colonial History laboratory by a team from the Pasteur Institute along the Parramatta River, which officially As a key link between the settlements of Sydney in France, and also as a temporary quarantine merges with Sydney Harbour at Longnose Point, and Parramatta, the Parramatta River played an area for a pet dog that French actress Sarah Birchgrove and Manns Point, Greenwich.
    [Show full text]
  • EPISODE 61 SUBURB SPOTLIGHT on GLADESVILLE Marcus
    EPISODE 61 SUBURB SPOTLIGHT ON GLADESVILLE Marcus: Good morning and welcome to another episode of the Sydney property inside podcast, your weekly podcast series that talks about all things property related in the city of Sydney. Michelle, how are you doing this fine morning? Michelle: Good, how are you? Marcus: Very very well. So today, we are going to back to one of our series which is the Suburbs Spotlight series and today, we're focused on Gladesville. Michelle: I know Gladesville. I know it well, I used to live there for a long time, actually. Marcus: Oh did you, I didn't know? Oh wow. Michelle: Yeah, I did. Marcus: 'Cause I personally don't know that much about Gladesville so this was certainly interesting reading for myself. Michelle: Yeah, Gladesville is a really interesting suburb. For those of you who don't know where it is, it's on the lower North Shore, northern suburbs of Sydney although sometimes it's counted as being part of the Inner West now, too. So it's situated on the northern banks of the Parramatta river and it's next to Hunters Hill to the northeast and Boronia Park to the north, with Ryde to the western side of it. It's approximately 10 Ks from the city and it's placed in between the local government area of the City of Ryde and the municipality of Hunters Hill. Michelle: So it's really got a very rich history, most of which I found on the dictionary of Sydney which is a fantastic website with lots of information about the history of different suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminant Chemistry and Toxicity of Sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: Spatial Extent and Chemistry–Toxicity Relationships
    Vol. 363: 71–87, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published July 15 doi: 10.3354/meps07445 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Contaminant chemistry and toxicity of sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia: spatial extent and chemistry–toxicity relationships Gavin F. Birch1,*, Stephanie McCready1, Edward R. Long2, Stuart S. Taylor1, 3, Gina Spyrakis1 1School of Geosciences, Environmental Geology Group, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia 2ERL Environmental, 3691 Cole Road South, Salem, Oregon 97306, USA 3URS, 116 Miller St., North Sydney, New South Wales, 2060, Australia ABSTRACT: The spatial distribution of chemical contamination and toxicity of surficial sediments in Sydney Harbour, Australia, was investigated in a 3-tiered, hierarchical approach. An initial chemical investigation throughout the entire estuary (Stage 1) indicated wide ranges and different spatial patterns in sediment chemical concentrations. Sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) were used as a preliminary estimate of possible toxicity in Stage 2 of the investigation. Assessment of chemical mixtures indicated that sediments in a small part (~2%) of the harbour had the highest probability of being toxic (~75%), whereas sediment in almost 25% of the port was estimated to have an inter- mediate (~50%) probability of being toxic. The SQG assessment in Stage 2 enabled careful stratifica- tion of the harbour into areas with different toxicity risks, reducing cost and time commitments in the final tier of assessment. The spatial survey carried out in Stage 3 involved concurrent chemical and ecotoxicological analyses. In this final stage, the degree of response in tests of amphipod survival in whole sediment samples, as well as in tests of microbial metabolism (Microtox©) and sea urchin egg fertilisation and embryo development in pore waters, generally increased with increasing chemical concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Construction Site: Victoria Road, Rozelle
    Community Update July 2018 Western Harbour Tunnel Temporary construction site: Victoria Road, Rozelle Western Harbour Tunnel is a The NSW Government has now major transport infrastructure A temporarily tunnelling site for Western Harbour Tunnel is released the proposed project project that makes it easier, proposed adjacent to Victoria reference design and there will faster and safer to get around Road, Rozelle. be extensive community and Sydney. This site is only needed stakeholder engagement over the temporarily and no major coming months. As Sydney continues to grow, our permanent facilities will be located transport challenge also increases We now want to hear what here. The site will be left clear for you think about the proposed and congestion impacts our future urban renewal. economy. reference design. Roads and Maritime recognises Your feedback will help us further While the NSW Government actively the importance of this site as refine the design before we seek manages Sydney’s daily traffic the home of the Balmain Tigers demands and major new public Leagues Club and will work with planning approval. transport initiatives are underway, it’s all parties concerned. There will be further extensive clear that even more must be done. community engagement once the Seaforth Spit Bridge Environmental Impact Statement Western Harbour Tunnel will provide is on public display. Northbridge a new motorway tunnel connection Balgowlah Heights Artarmon across Sydney Harbour between Seaforth Rozelle and the Warringah Freeway Spit Bridge near North Sydney. Northbridge Balgowlah Heights Artarmon It will form a new western bypass Lane Cove of the Sydney CBD, providing an Cammeray Ernest St alternative to the heavily congested St Leonards Mosman Falcon St Sydney Harbour Bridge, Western Lane Cove Crows Nest OFF Cremorne Distributor and Anzac Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet — Parklands
    Fact Sheet — Parklands The parklands at Sydney Olympic Park provide 430 hectares of open space, recreation areas, wetlands and waterways for the people of Sydney located in the heart of the growing metropolitan Sydney. • One of Australia’s largest urban parklands, Sydney Olympic Park is a diverse and special place where protected remnant woodlands, rare saltmarshes, waterbird refuge and mangroves stand alongside places of heritage significance to create a unique parkland setting. • A lasting legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic and Paralympic Games, the parklands have been designed and built on land formerly used by government industries including the State Abattoirs, State Brickworks and Commonwealth Department of Defence, and are the result of remediating industrial land — an internationally recognised leading environmental remediation and urban renewal project. • Today, the parklands are playing an increasingly important role as both a local park and as a significant regional park destination as Sydney grows. The parklands are an association of many different parks and places brought together as a single entity for management purposes. • The suburb of Sydney Olympic Park covers an area of 640 hectares, of which 430 hectares are parklands. • There are now over 2.7 million visits to the parklands annually, representing 27.5 percent of Sydney Olympic Park total visitation. • The parklands include the leisure and play areas of Bicentennial Park, Wentworth Common and Blaxland Riverside Park; the sporting grounds at Wilson Park and Archery Park, and Monster and Mountain X facilities; the state heritage listed Newington Armory; the more natural areas of Newington Nature Reserve and Badu Mangroves; the Brickpit and 100 hectares of wetlands and waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Auction Catalogue Ards Aw Wi a Nn V E a R N •
    LOCAL EXPERTISE | NATIONAL COVERAGE PROPERTY AUCTION CATALOGUE ARDS AW WI A NN V E A R N • THURSDAY 28 FEBRUARY 2019 AT 2:00 pm P • R R A O E THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR HOTEL, 37 CONDUIT STREET P Y E R E MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF T H Y T A F U O CT E ION HOUS www.networkauctions.co.uk 00875_NA_Cover_FEB 19.indd 3 04/02/2019 12:36 VENUE LOCATION THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR 37 CONDUIT STREET, MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF Opened in 1955, The Westbury Mayfair is primely located on Bond Street, in the heart of Mayfair’s fashion and arts district. The only hotel to occupy such a prized address, it shares its illustrious position with prestigious boutiques, arts institutions and city landmarks, offering an ideal base from which to explore the individuality and authentic personality of the neighbourhood. Heathrow Express at Paddington Station 3/4 mile Directions: The hotel is situated on Conduit Street between Regent Street and New Bond Street. Valet parking is available, please contact EDGWA R E R O A D the hotel for details. CARNABY STREET ST GEORGE STREET Nearest tube station: N E W B O N D REGENT STREET Oxford Circus BROOK STREET STREET CONDUIT STREET G R E E N S T www.marriott.co.uk | +44 20 7629 7755 GROSVENER STREET W O O D S M E W S UPPER BROOK ST C U L R O S S S T BURTON STREET OLD BOND STREET BERKELEY UPPER GROSVENORPARK STREET ST SQUARE DOVER STREET T 020 7871 0420 | E [email protected] www.networkauctions.co.uk INTRODUCING THE AUCTION TEAM Toby Limbrick Guy Charrison Stuart Elliott FNAVA FRICS, PPNAVA (Hons), FNAEA, FARLA, FRSA FNAVA, MARLA
    [Show full text]