Kanun and Sharia: Ottoman Land Law in Şeyhülislam Fatwas from Kanunname of Budin to the Kanunname-I Cedid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kanun and Sharia: Ottoman Land Law in Şeyhülislam Fatwas from Kanunname of Budin to the Kanunname-I Cedid View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Istanbul Sehir University Repository KANUN AND SHARIA: OTTOMAN LAND LAW IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS FROM KANUNNAME OF BUDİN TO THE KANUNNAME-İ CEDİD BÜNYAMİN PUNAR İSTANBUL ŞEHİR UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2015 KANUN AND SHARIA: OTTOMAN LAND LAW IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS FROM KANUNNAME OF BUDİN TO THE KANUNNAME-İ CEDİD A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF İSTANBUL ŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BY BUNYAMİN PUNAR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY AUGUST 2015 ABSTRACT KANUN AND SHARIA: OTTOMAN LAND LAW IN ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FATWAS FROM KANUNNAME OF BUDİN TO THE KANUNNAME-İ CEDİD PUNAR, BÜNYAMİN. MA, Department of History. Advisor: Assist. Prof. Abdurrahman Atçıl August 2015, 126 Pages This study explores the question of Islamic character of the Ottoman land law through scrutinizing the administration of proprietary claims on the land in the şeyhülislam fatwas. It also tracks the changes in the fatwas related to the proprietary claims on the land. ʿUlamaʾ views had a central role in the Ottoman land law from the beginning. First land codes were done either on the direction of their consultancies or directly by them. Therefore, as şeyhülislams were the head of that ulema, their fatwas played significant roles on the land issues. Basics of the Ottoman thinking on the land system was first set by Ebussuud from a sharia-centred perspective. Later şeyhülislams mainly remained loyal to Ebussuud’s doctrine and built the land law upon that base. However, new circumstances forced some little but important changes on the proprietary claims on the lands. Tracking these changes, reveals some clues for the Ottoman mentality on land law. This study finds those clues through analysing şeyhülislam fatwas between Ebussuud’s first extensive explanation in the code of Buda (1542) and the most extensive early-modern Ottoman achievement on land codification: Kanunname-i Cedid (dated 1674). It tackles the kanun-şeriat discussion in the context of the land law. iv There were some attempts to make changes in Ebussuud’s doctrine such as the fatwas of Hocazade Esad Efendi. However effects of such fatwas lasted short and were eliminated in the text of Kanunname-i Cedid at the end. In short Ottoman land law was standartised according to Ebussuud’s doctrine. This thesis argues that the Islamic legal tradition provided the overarching paradigm for Ebussuud’s and other şeyhülislams’ opinions on the land law. Keywords: Ottoman Land Law, Şeyhülislam Fatwas, Sharia, Kanun, Land Ownership. v ÖZ KANUN VE ŞERİAT: BUDİN KANUNNAMESİ’NDEN KANUNNAME-İ CEDİDE ŞEYHÜLİSLAM FETVALARINDA OSMANLI TOPRAK HUKUKU PUNAR, BÜNYAMİN. MA, Tarih Bölümü. Tez Danışmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Abdurrahman Atçıl Ağustos 2015, 126 Sayfa Bu çalışma Osmanlı toprak hukukunun şerʿi karakteri sorunsalına, toprak üzerindeki mülkiyet haklarının idaresini şeyhülislamların verdiği toprak fetvaları ışığında inceleyerek muhtemel cevaplar aramaktadır. Ayrıca bu tez toprak üzerindeki mülkiyet haklarının tarihsel süreç içerisindeki seyrini de bu fetvaların gözünden takip etmektedir. Daha ilk başından beri Osmanlı toprak hukukunda ulema merkezî bir role sahipti. İlk toprak kanunları ya onların danışmanlığında veya direkt olarak onlar tarafından hazırlanmıştı. Bu bağlamda, ulemanın başı olarak şeyhülislam ve onun fetvaları toprak meselelerindeki en önemli kaynak türüdür. Osmanlı toprak sisteminin arkasındaki zihniyet muhtemelen bu mantık çerçevesinde ilk defa Ebussuud tarafından şeriat merkezinde ortaya konulmuştu. Daha sonraki şeyhülislamlar da Ebussuud’un bu söylemine sadık kalmış ve toprak hukukunu bu temel üzerinde inşa etmişlerdi. Ancak yeni şartlar sonraki şeyhülislam fetvalarında toprak üzerindeki mülkiyet hakları bakımından bazı ufak olmakla beraber önemli değişiklikleri zorunlu kılmıştı. İşte bu değişimleri takip etmek toprak hukuku konusundaki Osmanlı zihniyeti hakkında bazı ipuçlarını ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu tezin yaptığı iş tam olarak Ebussuud’un 1542 Budin Kanunnamesindeki ilk kapsamlı açıklaması ve toprak hukuku alanında Yeniçağ Osmanlı’sının en kapsamlı başarısı olan Kanunname-i Cedid (1674) arasındaki şeyhülislam toprak fetvalarını vi inceleyerek bu ipuçlarını yakalamak ve bu ipuçları üzerinden Osmanlı hukuk tarihindeki şeriat-örf tartışmasına toprak bağlamında cevaplar üretmektir. Bahsi geçen dönem içerisinde (1542-1674), Ebussuud’un söylemlerine sadık kalma bağlamında Hocazade Esad Efendi gibi bazı fetva mecmualarında sapma eğilimleri görülmektedir. Ancak bu minvaldeki fetvaların etki süresi kısa olmuş ve sonradan Kanunname-i Cedid nezdinde yok hükmüne geçmişlerdir. Sonuç olarak, Osmanlı toprak hukuku Ebussuud’un şerʿi söylemi çerçevesinde standartlaşmıştır. Bu tezin argümanı ise Ebussuud öncesi dönem ve sonraki sapma eğilimi de dahil olmak üzere bütün Osmanlı toprak hukukunun başından beri şeriat çerçevesinde şekillendiğidir ki bu tezin kullandığı tüm birincil kaynaklar fetvalardaki detaylar bunu destekler niteliktedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Osmanlı Toprak Hukuku, Şeyhülislam Fetvaları, Şeriat, Kanun, Toprak Mülkiyeti. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my thesis advisor, Abdurrahman Atçıl for his invaluable patience, support and encouragement throughout the preparation process of this thesis. I would like to extend my thanks to Yunus Uğur from whom I learned a lot during my graduate years in Şehir University and whose comments for this thesis have been greatly enriching. I am also deeply grateful to Mehmet İpşirli who inspired me during my undergraduate and graduate years with his wonderful personality and great academic works. He kindly accepted to serve as my committee member and I am pleased to have his stimulating comments for this thesis. I am also thankful to Engin Deniz Akarlı for his continuous guidance and support since my first semester at İstanbul Şehir University. I also owe thanks to Mehmet Genç who inspired me with his great character and lessons without even knowing it. I am thankful to Kemal Karpat who taught to me a life lesson along with his priceless academic instructions despite his advanced age. Above all, I want to thank Şehir University History department for providing me with a chance to meet such wonderful personalities. The financial support from the The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), National Directorship of Supporting Program of Scientists (BİDEB) made this study possible. The library of The Center for Islamic Studies (İSAM) provided many primary and secondary sources that I used in this study. I could not have written this thesis without the facilities that the İSAM Library provided me. I would also like to express my thanks to the staff of İSAM Library, Library of Şehir University as well as the manuscript libraries of Süleymaniye and Istanbul Municipality Atatürk Library for allowing me to use their collections. During the process of writing this thesis, many dear friends and colleagues encouraged and supported me with their priceless friendships. I am grateful to all of them and pleased to be able to express my thanks to Mehmet Yılmaz Akbulut, Murat Hatip, Mehmet Akif Berber, Cankat Kaplan, Bünyamin Cansev, Ömercan Tohti, Ahmet Tahir Nur, Gürzat Kami, Abdurrahman Nur, Yunus Babacan, and many others. My beloved fiancée Büşra Betül Öztunca deserves the warmest thanks for her viii love and for being a constant source of psychological support for this thesis. It would be much harder to finish this study without her support. Finally, I owe thanks to my family. My sisters Filiz Korkmaz and Meryem Barındık together with my elder brothers, Habil Punar, Yusuf Punar and Yunus Emre Punar, were always there with their generous support and understanding. My father Niyazi Punar showed continuous self-sacrifice, support, affection and patience that cannot be adequately expressed during this process. I thank him for his supportive stand. ix In Loving Memory of Nazife Punar… x TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................... iv Öz ................................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... viii CHAPTERS 1. Introduction: The Ottoman Land Law and Şeyhülislam Fatwas ..................... 1 1.1. Why to study Ottoman land issues and the question of religious law system? ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Nature of the Fatwas .................................................................................. 4 1.3. Conceptual Framework .............................................................................. 6 1.4. Literature Review ...................................................................................... 9 1.5. Sources ..................................................................................................... 13 1.6. Outline of the Chapters ............................................................................ 14 2. Ebussuud and Ottoman Land System ............................................................ 16 2.1. The Context.............................................................................................. 16 2.2. Hanafite Origins ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Application of Islamic Law Of
    236 Tahsin ÖZCAN institution lending to individuals. Legitimization of the cash foundations was very THE LEGITIMIZATION PROCESS OF CASH controvertial and it was one of the most debated legal institutions by the Ottoman scholars during the mid-sixteenth century. Legitimization of cash foundations is, FOUNDATIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION as an institution, generally accepted as the contribution of the Ottomans to the OF ISLAMIC LAW OF WAQF IN THE Islamic civilization. On the other hand, it was also observed as contradicting to the Islamic law. During the Ottoman era, cash foundations were generally accepted as 1 OTTOMAN SOCIETY valid and legal institutions, except for a short prohibition period in the mid- sixteenth century. Depending on its increasing importance, it became the subject of a fevered discussion in the mid 16th century among the Ottoman scholars. The discussion process took a few decades to conclude, and as a result of the Tahsin ÖZCAN' discussion, cash foundations were banned for a few years. But finally, the issue was re-examined by a group of scholars and it was declared that cash foundations are legal and void according to the Islamic Law (Hanafite School). In this paper, the process of the legitimization of the cash foundations is analyzed and discussed ÖZET in detail. PARA VAKIFLARININ MEŞRULAŞTIRILMASI SÜRECİ: Keywords: Ottoman Society, Islamic Law, Law of Waqf, Cash Foundation, İSLAM VAKIF HUKUKUNUN OSMANLI TOPLUMUNDA UYGULANMASINA DAİR BİR ANALİZ Foundation. Osmanlı toplumu tarihçilerin "Vakıf Medeniyeti" olarak adlandırmasına yol açacak derecede gelişmiş bir vakıf sistemine sahipti. Bu sistem içinde para vakıfları Osmanlılara özgü bir uygulama olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebussuud Efendi
    Christian-Muslim Relations A Bibliographical History Volume 7. Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa and South America (1500-1600) Edited by David Thomas and John Chesworth with John Azumah, Stanisław Grodź, Andrew Newman, Douglas Pratt LEIDEN • BOSTON 2015 For use by the Author only | © 2015 Koninklijke Brill NV CONTENTS Foreword ....................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations ............................................................................................... xi Martha Frederiks, Introduction: Christians, Muslims and empires in the 16th century .................................................................................... 1 Alan Guenther, The arrival of European Christians in India during the 16th century .......................................................................................... 15 Works on Christian-Muslim relations 1500-1600 ................................ 27 Central and Eastern Europe ..................................................................... 29 Middle East and North Africa .................................................................. 549 Asia, Africa and South America ............................................................... 743 Index of Names ............................................................................................ 933 Index of Titles ............................................................................................... 946 For use by the Author only | © 2015 Koninklijke
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ideas of Derviş Vahdeti As Reflected in Volkan Newspaper (1908-1909)
    THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) by TALHA MURAT Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University AUGUST 2020 THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) Approved by: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel . (Thesis Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Ayşe Ozil . Assist. Prof. Fatih Bayram . Date of Approval: August 10, 2020 TALHA MURAT 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) TALHA MURAT TURKISH STUDIES M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Derviş Vahdeti, Volkan, Pan-Islamism, Ottomanism, Political Islam The aim of this study is to reveal and explore the political ideas of Derviş Vahdeti (1870-1909) who was an important and controversial actor during the first months of the Second Constitutional Period (1908-1918). Starting from 11 December 1908, Vahdeti edited a daily newspaper, named Volkan (Volcano), until 20 April 1909. He personally published a number of writings in Volkan, and expressed his ideas on multiple subjects ranging from politics to the social life in the Ottoman Empire. His harsh criticism that targeted the policies of the Ottoman Committee of Progress and Union (CUP, Osmanlı İttihâd ve Terakki Cemiyeti) made him a serious threat for the authority of the CUP. Vahdeti later established an activist and religion- oriented party, named Muhammadan Union (İttihâd-ı Muhammedi). Although he was subject to a number of studies on the Second Constitutional Period due to his alleged role in the 31 March Incident of 1909, his ideas were mostly ignored and/or he was labelled as a religious extremist (mürteci).
    [Show full text]
  • Osmanli Devleti'nin “Resm-I Çift”
    Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi XXXI / 1, 2016, 177-217 OSMANLI DEVLETİ’NİN “RESM-İ ÇİFT” UYGULAMALARINI YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK* Osman Gümüşçü** - Emine Erdoğan Özünlü*** Öz Osmanlı sosyal, ekonomik, idari ve askeri sisteminin timar temelli bir sistem üzerine inşa edildiği malumdur. Bu temel ise, adına çift-hâne sistemi denilen ve bir ailenin geçimini sağlayacak büyüklükte toprağı işlemesine dayanmaktaydı. Mülkiyeti devlete ait olan bu toprağa, “çift” adı veriliyor ve aile elindeki bu toprağı zorunlu haller dışında sürekli işlemekle yükümlü tutuluyordu. Ailenin işletme hakkını elinde tuttuğu bu toprak için devlete, yani onun temsilcisi sipahiye ödediği vergiye, “resm-i çift” adı veriliyor ve bu ödemeyi aksatmadan yaptığı sürece, toprağı kontrolünde bulunduruyor, hatta işlediği bu toprağı babadan oğula intikal ettirebiliyordu. Osmanlı yönetimi, fethettiği bölgelerde öteden beri sürdürülen sosyal ve ekonomik düzeni başlangıçta olduğu gibi benimsemiş, gerekli durumlarda ise zamana yayarak bir takım değişikliklere gidebilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, reâyâdan alınan en önemli vergilerden biri olan resm-i çift, imparatorluğun her tarafında farklı bedeller üzerinden alınabilmiştir. Esas itibariyle topraktan alınan verginin “alâ-evsât-ednâ” olarak üç kategori üzerinden alınmasına rağmen, resm-i çift için çok farklı miktarların uygulanması izaha muhtaçtır. Gerçekten de belgeler ve çalışmalar üzerine yaptığımız taramada, Osmanlı topraklarında çift vergisi, mekâna ve zamana göre değişmekle birlikte bu verginin 6 ile 100 akçe arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada bahsi geçen farklılığın nedenleri üzerinde durularak, Barkan ve diğerleri tarafından söylenen “önceki yönetimlerden devralınan tarihî faktörler”in tek sebep mi olduğu; yoksa bu husus yanında “mekânsal faktörler”in de etkili olup olmadığı sorusu cevaplandırılmaya çalışılmış ve özellikle “arz-talep” dengesinin ön plana çıktığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Anahtar kelimeler: Resm-i çift, çift-hâne sistemi, çiftlik, Osmanlı tarımı, Osmanlı devleti.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Kânûnnâme Writing in the 16 and 17
    THE EVOLUTION OF KÂNÛNNÂME WRITING IN THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY-OTTOMAN EMPIRE: A COMPARISON OF KÂNÛN-İ „OSMÂNÎ OF BAYEZĠD II AND KÂNÛNNÂME-İ CEDÎD A Master‟s Thesis by FATMA GÜL KARAGÖZ Department Of History Bilkent University Ankara September 2010 THE EVOLUTION OF KÂNÛNNÂME WRITING IN THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY-OTTOMAN EMPIRE: A COMPARISON OF KÂNÛN-İ „OSMÂNÎ OF BAYEZĠD II AND KÂNÛNNÂME-İ CEDÎD The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by FATMA GÜL KARAGÖZ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA September 2010 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Halil Ġnalcık Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Evgeni R. Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Bahaeddin Yediyıldız Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT THE EVOLUTION OF KÂNÛNNÂME WRITING IN THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY-OTTOMAN EMPIRE: A COMPARISON OF KÂNÛN-İ OSMÂNÎ OF BAYEZĠD II AND KÂNÛNNÂME-İ CEDÎD Karagöz, Fatma Gül M.A., Department of History Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLISHER S Iranian Opposition to the Shah
    HAH S Guide Iranian Opposition to the Shah Advisor: Wolfgang H. Behn Staatsbibliothek Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin RANIAN OPPOSITION TO THE I AIDC PUBLISHERP U R L 1 5H E R S S BRILLB RI LL WolfgangWolfgang H.H. Behn,Behn, StaatsbibliothekStaatsbibliothek Preussischer Preussischer Kulturbesitz,Kulturbesitz, BerlinBerlin GuideGuide to the microform collection collection IDC numbersnumbers NE-1550NE-1550 - NE-1578 NE-1578 MU IDCIDC PUBLISHERSPUBLISHERS 1988 The Iranian opposition to the Shah The overthrow of the Shah came as a great surprise, even to many Iranists, in spite of the fact that the revolution had been in the air in Tehran long before this was realized in the West. More enigmatic than the Islamic revolution itself were the aims of its supporters, although most of the opposition groups had explicitly stated their objectives in their publications long before the revolution. But the tightening censorship in Iran had forced the whole spectrum of the opposition to publish abroad. The evasive nature of dissident literature makes bibliographical control, and acquisition in general, extremely difficult. In the case of the Iranian revolution we are fortunate that "W.H. Behn has taken on the formidable task of listing (in his bibliographies) every publication of an anti-Pahlavi nature in Persian, or in other languages about Iran, published outside Iran between 1962 and the establishment of the Islamic Republic in 1979. The measure of his success is that he has amassed a total of some 800 books and pamphlets... [The ] work... will be an indispensable tool for anyone studying the recent history of Iran and the sources of the opposition to the Shah that led to the revolution of 1979" (Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The State's Religion Is Islam
    REMOVAL OF THE STATEMENT “THE STATE’S RELIGION IS ISLAM” FROM THE CONSTITUTION IN 1928 Assist. Prof. Dr.Mehmet BICICI Gaziantep University Introduction Historically, the concept of a Constitution first appeared in the late 1700s. In order to limit the power of the state and, at the same time, guarantee the rights and freedoms of the citizens, the need arose to enact laws which would stand above other laws and which could not be easily amended, leading to the emergence of the concept of a constitution. Before the constitutional movements started gaining a foothold, countries maintained law and order through their own legislation or edicts. But none of these laws had a privileged status in the hierarchy of laws and they were very easy to change. The first constitution known to have been written is the 1787 United States Constitution. The Constitution of the United States of America was followed by the 1791 French Constitution , the 1809 Swedish Constitution, the 1812 Spanish Constitution, the 1814 Norwegian Constitution, the 1831 Belgian Constitution, the 1848 Swiss Constitution, the 1848 Italian Constitution, the 1848 Prussian Constitution, the 1849 Danish Constitution, the 1849 Luxembourgian Constitution, the 1864 Greek Constitution, the 1866 Romanian Constitution and finally the 1876 Ottoman Constitution (Gözler, 2004; p.13-19). Prior to the Ottoman Constitution that came into force in 1876, the legal system of the Ottoman Empire, which had a monarchical and theocratic structure and consisted of two basic elements. The first of these were the rules of Islamic law (Shariah or Ahkam-i Şer’iyye), and the second were the set of rules dictated by the Ottoman sultans (customary laws, laws, code of customary laws).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman State and Semi-Nomadic Groups Along
    HStud 27 (2013)2, 219–235 DOI: 10.1556/HStud.27.2013.2.2 THE OTTOMAN STATE AND SEMI-NOMADIC GROUPS ALONG THE OTTOMAN DANUBIAN SERHAD (FRONTIER ZONE) IN THE LATE 15TH AND THE FIRST HALF OF THE 16TH CENTURIES: CHALLENGES AND POLICIES NIKOLAY ANTOV University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA E-mail: [email protected] The main subject of this article is the relationship between the Ottoman state and semi-nomadic groups in the Ottoman Danubian frontier zone (serhad) in the late 15th and the first half of the 16th century. Taking the two extremities of the Danubian frontier zone – the provinces of Smederevo in Serbia and Silistre in the northeastern Balkans – as case studies, the article compares the ways in which the Ottoman state dealt with semi-nomadic Vlachs at one end of the frontier zone and Turcoman yürüks (and related groups) at the other. Placing the subject in the broader context of the historical development of the Danubian frontier zone, the author analyzes the Ottoman state’s changing policies toward these two groups. Taking into account the largely different historical legacies and demographic make-ups, the article analyzes the many commonalities (as well as some important differences) in the way the Ot- toman government integrated such groups in its administrative structure. It high- lights the process in which such semi-nomadic groups, traditionally utilized by the Ottoman state as auxiliary soldiers, were gradually “tamed” by the state in the course of the 16th century, becoming gradually sedentarized and losing their privi- leged status. Keywords: Ottoman, frontier, 16th century, semi-nomads, Vlachs, Yürüks The frontier and (pastoral) nomadism are two concepts that have fascinated (Mid- dle Eastern and) Ottomanist historians from the very conception of these fields of historical inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • ANG TARIQA AY NAGTUTURO NG MAGANDANG ASAL Assalamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh
    ANG TARIQA AY NAGTUTURO NG MAGANDANG ASAL Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh. Authu Billahi Minash-shaytanir Rajeem, Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem. Madad Ya Rasulallah, Madad Ya As’habi Rasulallah, Madad Ya Mashayikhina, Shaykh Abdullah Daghestani, Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani. Dastur. Abu Ayyub al-Ansari. Madad. Tariqatunas sohba, wal khayru fil jam’iyya. Ang pagiging marespeto sa awliya, sa mga Ulama at sa mga magulang ang tinuturo sa Tariqa. “At-Tariqatu kulluha adab.”Ang tariqa ay binubuo ng magandang asal.Walang magandang asal kung walang tariqa. Karamihan sa mga muslim ngayon ay wala ng magandang asal. Maganda ang pagiging masunurin at magandang asal sa mga mgaulang pero ngayon wala ng kagandahang asal dahil di na sila sumusunod sa tariqa.Ang tariqa ay nagututuro ng kagandahang asal. Dito sa Anatoia, ang mga tariqa ay pinagbawala. Nung mawala ang Ottomans napuno na ng demonyo ang lugar na ito. Ang Tariqa ay pinagbawal din sa ilang muslim na bansa. Mayroon din na ibang bansa ang masama ang tingin sa tariqa. Sabi nila kapag nagpakita ka ng magandang asal at respeto ay masama ka daw. Ganito ang pagkagalit nila sa Tariqa. Sinusundan nila ang shaytan. Akala nila na dasal at pag-ayuno lang ang kailangan sa Islam. Mahalaga ang matutuo ng kagandahan asal. Tinuruan ng magandang asal ang Banal Propeta Muhammad alayhis salatu was salam at kanya naman ito naituro sa mga Sahaba. Ang mga Sahaba naman ang nagturo sa mga Ulama at Awliya. Ito ang daan niya. May mga zawiyas na ipinasara na dahil nawala na ang mga Shaykhs at Ulama. Ang mga natira na lang ay mga masasamang loob.May ilan din ang mga sumusunod sa kanila at nadadala sa kasamaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Iranian-Saudi Relations in the Persian Gulf Regional Security Complex (1920-1979) Nima Baghdadi Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-22-2018 Dynamics of Iranian-Saudi Relations in the Persian Gulf Regional Security Complex (1920-1979) Nima Baghdadi Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC006552 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Baghdadi, Nima, "Dynamics of Iranian-Saudi Relations in the Persian Gulf Regional Security Complex (1920-1979)" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3652. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3652 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida DYNAMICS OF IRANIAN-SAU DI RELATIONS IN THE P ERSIAN GULF REGIONAL SECURITY COMPLEX (1920-1979) A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICAL SCIENCE by Nima Baghdadi 2018 To: Dean John F. Stack Steven J. Green School of International Relations and Public Affairs This dissertation, written by Nima Baghdadi, and entitled Dynamics of Iranian-Saudi Relations in the Persian Gulf Regional Security Complex (1920-1979), having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. __________________________________ Ralph S. Clem __________________________________ Harry D.
    [Show full text]
  • 9783319925219.Pdf
    MARXISM & LEFT-WING POLITICS in Europe and Iran Yadullah Shahibzadeh Marxism and Left-Wing Politics in Europe and Iran Yadullah Shahibzadeh Marxism and Left-Wing Politics in Europe and Iran Yadullah Shahibzadeh Oslo, Norway ISBN 978-3-319-92521-9 ISBN 978-3-319-92522-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92522-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952228 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]