Arxiv:Hep-Th/9712244V1 29 Dec 1997

Home , Landau pole

arXiv:hep-th/9712244v1 29 Dec 1997 eomlzdfrinmass, fermion renormalized h nieter sol plcbefrmmnasmaller momenta for applicable Λ only than is theory entire the ntolo etrainter smc h ae The same. the much situation is The (renormalized) theory trivial. perturbation is two-loop theory the in that goes charge meaning renormalized zero, the to infinity, to cut-off the sends a oele nargo fprmtrsaewihi made is which space parameter breaking. of symmetry chiral region spontaneous a by be- in Lan inaccessible relation the lies the that pole of reveals study quantities dau renormalized detailed and A bare vanishin tween limit. charge continuum renormalized the results the in find with we consistent mass are and charge which renormalized the For lations. h ocle adupl 1.I h edn logarithmic of leading existence the the finds In one to [1]. calculation due pole theory Landau the so-called problems the of potential are foundations there the that in theory. known perturbation been of long context has the It in is success its all But where edtectfft nnt hl keeping to while attempts infinity one When to cutoff cutoff. the ultra-violet the send is Λ and enb okn ttegueivratpr ftephoton the of part invariant be gauge also propagator the can at problem The looking by pole. seen Landau the of location the hc a hs oeat pole ghost a has which eebr1997 December HUB-EP-97/88 97-252 DESY nsthat finds E stebs etdo l unu edtheories. field quantum all of tested best the is QED eivsiaealtievrino E ynmrclsimu- numerical by QED of version lattice a investigate We d e etce lkrnnSnhornDS,HR n Institut and HLRZ DESY, Elektronen-Synchrotron Deutsches L β ( nteohrhn,we n keeps one when hand, other the On . R e D R k e e ≡ ( 1 stebr rnraie)charge, (renormalized) bare the is ) R 2 2 k iegsat diverges ) m − = β R e Λ = Λ a .INTRODUCTION I. 1 .GöckelerM. ∂m 2 function k ∂e ntttfu hoeicePyi,Universität Regensbu Physik, für Theoretische Institut c 2 = f ntttfu hoeicePyi,FeeUniversität Ber Freie Physik, für Theoretische Institut R 2 [1 R b ordZs-etu ¨rIfraintcnkBri,D- Berlin, für Informationstechnik Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum β

− ntttfu hsk ubltUiesta uBri,D- Berlin, Humboldt-Universität für zu Physik, Institut L e 1 2 e ln ≡ ( k = β etce lkrnnSnhornDS,D263Hamburg, D-22603 DESY, Elektronen-Synchrotron Deutsches 2 1 m m Λ = β Λ / N a R R )ln( 2) 1 1 .Horsley R. , steeaLna oePolmi QED? in Problem Pole Landau a there Is f e e β , R 4 L 2 β stenme fflavors of number the is 1 hswudma that mean would This . + 1 e 1 k R 2 = 2 β , /m 2 e 6 N R 6 π R 2 f 2 + )] , b e .Linke V. , · · · , R e xd one fixed, m xdand fixed R sthe is c (1) (4) (2) (3) .Rakow P. , g - 1 lcdt oe values lower to placed ean oiiefrall for positive remains h hrlcnest nlreltie 5.I hsletter this In [5]. lattices large compute computed we on recently condensate have We chiral the region. the of critical function the a in as charge cut-off renormalized the know to need e.Eeyter hc sntaypoial resuf- free Λ asymptotically While not problem. this is from which fers theory Every lem. lcrni osdrd Λ considered, is electron eowiekeeping while zero oe.I h iia uesmercSadr Model Standard Λ Supersymmetric (MSSM) Minimal the In Model. ige,wihoesaslto otesrn Pprob- Λ CP to strong down moves the pole to Landau solution the lem, a offers which Higgses, fteLna oei QED. in pole Landau the of h oi line solid The e h ahdline dashed The am h nes atc pcn ae vrterl fteultra- the lattice of the role cut-off, the On over violet takes lattice. spacing the lattice inverse on the problem natural is the investigate it Thus to QED. of academic. formulation means non-perturbative no by is pole Landau the Thus rniina togculn [3,4]: using coupling phase strong theory chiral at order the transition second a of undergoes formulation fermions staggered non-compact the that ennflcniumlmtcnb ae ttetricritical the at point taken be can limit continuum meaningful re hs rniin nwhich on transitions phase order c 2 oudrtn h otnu ii fteter,we theory, the of limit continuum the understand To E sntteol hoywt adupl prob- pole Landau a with theory only the not is QED ofidaslto oti rbe,oems osdra consider must one problem, this to solution a find To saln ffis re hrlpaetastos where transitions, phase chiral order first of line a is R ¨ rHceegehsk -53 ete,Germany Zeuthen, D-15735 für Hochenergiephysik, d , .Schierholz G. , am a 3 g -34 eesug Germany Regensburg, D-93040 rg, h ψψ i,D115Bri,Germany Berlin, D-14195 lin, ¯ Λ 0, = L L am 6 i 01 eln Germany Berlin, 10115 ≃ = a ,ee huhtebr asi zero. is mass bare the though even 0, = 49 eln Germany Berlin, 14195 am R − e m 10 2 1 am and R 20 = m ∼ e 0, = d,e β e,adi h SMwt four with MSSM the in and GeV, R e 1 .Erycluain aeshown have calculations Early Λ. 0, = e 1 c 2 e fixed. R Germany R 2 n .Stüben H. and eas eew a take can we here because , e L R 2 m nodrt nesadtefate the understand to order in n h adupl sdis- is pole Landau the and , ≃ β e en h aemass, bare the being 1 c 2 β 10 + e > 2 L e 34 β ≃ R 2 2 am e nteStandard the in GeV e 2 10 R 2 saln fsecond of line a is R 227 f , L β β a 1 2 2 ≃ e fol the only if GeV 3 . h 10 ψψ ¯ 17 i e [2]. GeV .A 0. = e a 2 (5) to > FIG. 1. The renormalized mass against the bare coupling FIG. 2. The chiral condensate against the renormalized 4 4 4 4 on 12 and 16 lattices. mass on 12 and 16 lattices.

and 12 in our case). To extrapolate to k = 0 we need to II. FERMION MASS make a fit to the photon propagator. The k dependence of the photon propagator is given by We obtain the renormalized mass from the fermion 1 1 propagator as outlined in Ref. [6]. We are using stag- 2 − 2 = −Π(k,mR,L) , (7) gered fermions which in the continuum limit correspond e D(k) e to N = 4 flavors of dynamical Dirac fermions. The re- f where Π is the polarization function. In the infinite vol- sults are shown in Fig. 1. ume limit we then have Fitting and extrapolating this data it greatly helps that 3 the chiral condensate σ = a hψψ¯ i is a function of amR 1 1 2 − 2 = −Π(0,mR, ∞) . (8) only [6]. In Fig. 2 we plot σ as a function of amR. We eR e observe that σ is well described by the polynomial 3 5 We have already seen that the non-perturbative Π is ac- σ =0.6197amR − 0.321(amR) +0.169(amR) tually very close to the result of one-loop renormalized 7 −0.040(amR) , (6) perturbation theory [6]. So it is reasonable to make an ansatz which is inspired by renormalization group im- where the first coefficient is given by the one-loop result. proved two-loop perturbation theory. In Ref. [7] it is This helps because we have already found an equation of shown that to next-to-leading logarithmic order the po- state (EOS) that describes the σ data [5]. Combining the larization function can be written EOS with the polynomial (6) gives the curves shown in V Fig. 1 and the extrapolation to am = 0. (Here we have Π= U − ln(1 − e2U) , (9) used fit 1 of Ref. [5]. Our results do not change quali- U tatively if we use any of the other fits described there.) 2 2 where U is the one-loop perturbative result, and V the For 1/e < 1/e chiral symmetry is broken, and even at c two-loop one. The lattice result for U is known [6]. For am = 0 the renormalized mass is non-zero. This means V we make the ansatz there is an excluded region shown in white in Fig. 1 (the accessible region being shown in gray). V = v0 + v1U . (10)

2 2 This is motivated by the small k and mR limits. For III. RENORMALIZED CHARGE 2 2 2 2 2 2 a mR ≪ a k ≪ 1 we should have V ≃ (β2/2) ln a k , 2 2 2 2 and for a k ≪ a mR ≪ 1 we should have V ≃ 2 2 The renormalized charge is obtained from the residue (β2/2) ln a mR. The one-loop result U has these proper- 2 2 of the photon propagator, eR = Z3 e and Z3 = ties. We ﬁt this ansatz to a total of 52 photon propaga- 4 4 2 limk→0 limV →∞ D(k). We can compute D(k) on the lat- tors on 16 and 12 lattices for various values of am, e tice, but not at k = 0. The smallest momentum that we in the range 0.005 ≤ am ≤ 0.16, 0.16 ≤ 1/e2 ≤ 0.22 close 2 can reach is 2π/aL, where L is the lattice size (L = 16 to the critical point at 1/ec =0.19040(9) [5]. A plot for

2 FIG. 3. The residue of the photon propagator against the 2 4 momentum for 1/e = 0.20,am = 0.005 on the 16 lattice. The open symbols are the data, the solid symbols are the ﬁt. one particular parameter set is shown in Fig. 3. For the ﬁt parameters we obtain v0 = −0.00207(2) and v1 = −0.0328(7), giving χ2/d.o.f. = 1.7. Two-loop continuum 2 perturbation theory would give v1 ≡ β2/β1 = 3/16π = 0.0190. In Fig. 4 we show the resulting β function for 2 2 e = ec. We compare this with the one-loop result. We see that the β function is a little smaller than the one- loop value and is positive. In particular this means that there is no ultra-violet stable zero in the β function out 2 2 2 to eR = ec, the maximal value eR can take because Z3 ≤ 1 [8,9]. As amR → ∞ fermion loops are suppressed and 2 2 eR → e , so that the β function vanishes. But this is of course not an interesting zero of the β function.

FIG. 5. A sketch of the mapping from the bare parameter plane (top) to the renormalized parameter plane (bottom).

IV. THE LANDAU POLE

Having calculated the renormalized mass and charge, we are now able to discuss the mapping from the bare parameters am, e to the renormalized parameters amR, eR. Qualitatively this is displayed in Fig. 5. One can choose any e2 ≥ 0, am shown in the top part of the figure by the gray region. This is then mapped onto the corresponding gray region in the bottom part of the 2 2 2 figure. The line am = 0 from e = 0 to e = ec is 2 2 2 mapped onto the point amR = eR = 0. For e > ec we have already seen in Fig. 1 that amR > 0, even when am = 0, because of chiral symmetry breaking. Thus the 2 2 2 line am = 0 from e = ec to e = ∞ is mapped onto FIG. 4. The β function against the renormalized charge. the border line of the gray regions, and the white area The solid curve is our result, the dashed curve is the lattice is inaccessible for any combination of bare parameters. one-loop result. From this figure we evidently have triviality. Removing

3 From eq. (8) we find the Landau pole by setting the bare charge to infinity. This gives the dotted line. We see that it completely lies in the inaccessible region. It runs roughly parallel to the border line am = 0. We also want to be sure that the photon propagator has no ghost pole for any k2. Beyond leading logarithmic order the extra pole in the photon propagator and the divergence in e2 need not appear at the same place. The ghost pole position (in the infinite volume) is given by 1/k2D(k) = 0. It has a solution if 1 2 < max Π(k,mR, ∞) − Π(0,mR, ∞). (11) eR k The solution is given by the dashed line in the bottom part of Fig. 6. This lies close to the Landau pole, even deeper in the inaccessible region.

V. CONCLUSION

From Figs. 5, 6 we see that the triviality of QED is in- timately connected with chiral symmetry breaking. Any attempt to remove the cut-oﬀ is always thwarted by the dynamically generated fermion mass. In particular this means that spinor QED does not exist as an interacting theory, similar to what Coleman and Weinberg [10] found for scalar QED. We have also seen that chiral symmetry breaking al- lows QED to escape the Landau pole problem. While the bare parameters of the theory can take any values, the renormalized parameters are restricted. The Landau pole and ghost problem only occur deep in the inaccessi- 2 ble eR, amR region. Chiral symmetry breaking is always strong enough to push the Landau pole above the cut-oﬀ.

FIG. 6. The (quantitative) mapping of the bare parameter plane (top) to the renormalized parameter plane (bottom). [1] L. D. Landau, in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, ed. W. Pauli (Pergamon Press, London, 1955). 2 [2] F. J. Yndura´ın, in Gauge Theories - Past and Future, eds. the cut-off (a → 0) is only possible at eR = 0. At any finite value of e2 there is a minimal possible value for R. Akhoury et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992). R [3] J. B. Kogut, E. Dagotto and A. Kocic, Phys. Rev. Lett. |amR|, namely the boundary of the gray region. The position of the Landau pole is sketched by the dotted 60, 772 (1988). [4] M. Göckeler, R. Horsley, E. Laermann, P. Rakow, G. line. Schierholz, R. Sommer and U.-J. Wiese, Nucl. Phys. We now turn to the quantitative analysis of the prob- B334, 527 (1990). lem. In Fig. 6 we plot again the bare and renormalized 2 2 [5] M. Göckeler, R. Horsley, V. Linke, P. Rakow, G. Schier- planes, this time using 1/e and 1/eR, respectively, as the holz and H. Stüben, Nucl. Phys. B487, 313 (1997). horizontal variables because this displays the asymptotic 2 [6] M. Göckeler, R. Horsley, P. Rakow, G. Schierholz and R. behavior best. The curves are lines of constant 1/eR Sommer, Nucl. Phys. B371, 713 (1992). (top part) and lines of constant am (bottom part), re- 2 [7] D. V. Shirkov, Theor. Mat. Fiz. (USA) 49, 1039 (1981); spectively. All lines of constant eR end on the first order Nucl. Phys. B371, 467 (1992). 2 phase transition line, and only the line eR = 0 goes into [8] J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum the critical point. This is another expression of trivial- Fields (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965). ity of the theory. In the bottom part of the figure the [9] M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B341, 341 (1990). gray region is again the allowed region, and the white [10] S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 1888 region is inaccessible. The border line is the line am = 0. (1973).