DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document 14 January 2004 B5-0014/2004 } B5-0017/2004 } B5-0021/2004 } B5-0024/2004 } B5-0027/2004 } B5-0029/2004 } RC1 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 50(5) of the Rules of Procedure, by – John Alexander Corrie, Jean-Pierre Bebear, Vitaliano Gemelli and Bernd Posselt on behalf of the PPE-DE Group – Margrietus J. van den Berg and Francisca Sauquillo Pérez del Arco on behalf of the PSE Group – Cecilia Malmström, Johan Van Hecke and Colette Flesch on behalf of the ELDR Group – Nelly Maes, Patricia McKenna and Didier Rod on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group – Pedro Marset Campos on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group – Niall Andrews, Gerard Collins, Brian Crowley, Jim Fitzsimons, Liam Hyland and Seán Ó Neachtainon behalf of the UEN Group replacing the motions by the following groups: – PSE (B5-0014/2004), – PPE-DE (B5-0017/2004), – Verts/ALE (B5-0021/2004), – ELDR (B5-0024/2004), – GUE/NGL (B5-0027/2004), – UEN (B5-0029/2004), on the situation in Burundi RC\520070EN.doc PE 340.696} PE 340.699} PE 340.703} PE 340.706} PE 340.709} PE 340.711} RC1 EN EN European Parliament resolution on the situation in Burundi The European Parliament, – having regard to Rule 50(5) of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Burundi, in particular that of 23 October 2003, – having regard to the declaration issued by the EU Presidency on 19 November 2003, A. shocked by the brutal murder of Monsignor Michael Courtney, the Apostolic Nuncio in Burundi, in a road ambush in Bururi province on 29 December 2003, B. whereas, although no one has yet claimed responsibility for this murder, suspicions point to the FLN, the only rebel movement which has not laid down its arms, C. whereas that movement has issued death threats against the Archbishop of Bujumbura, who was accusing them of the murder of the Apostolic Nuncio, D. whereas that movement denies responsibility for the murder, has lifted its ultimatum calling on the Archbishop of Bujumbura to leave the country, and, for the first time, has stated its willingness to meet the President of the Republic with a view to opening negotiations, E. whereas Monsignor Courtney had been helping the peace process in Burundi in a quiet and effective manner, after many years of dedicated service to the Holy See in many difficult and challenging postings, and had been instrumental in persuading some rebel groups to give up their armed struggle, F. whereas the peace process had recently been gathering momentum, with the signing on 16 November 2003 of the peace agreement between the Transitional Government of Burundi and the Forces for the Defence of Democracy (FDD) movement led by Pierre Nkurunziza, which follows the Pretoria Protocol signed on 8 October 2003 by the CNDD-FDD movement, and the subsequent agreements of 2 November 2003 signed by the FDD, G. regretting, however, that fighting is still going on in several provinces, especially in rural Bujumbura, and deploring in particular the killing of five people on 5 January 2004 in the eastern Bujumbura district of Gihosha, H. whereas attention must be drawn to the remarks by the UN Secretary-General to the effect that Burundians must experience an improvement in their living conditions or the budding peace process may be jeopardised, I. seriously concerned at the worsening human rights situation, which has prompted Oxfam to suspend its operations in the country, despite the desperate needs to be met, RC\520070EN.doc PE 340.696} PE 340.699} PE 340.703} PE 340.706} PE 340.709} PE 340.711} RC1 EN 1. Strongly condemns the brutal murder of Monsignor Courtney, who, as a diplomat, was entitled to special protection by the authorities, and calls for a full and independent investigation in order to identify and bring to justice those responsible; extends its condolences to his family and friends and to the Holy See; 2. Recognises and appreciates the quiet and effective ways in which Monsignor Courtney had been helping the peace process and alleviating the suffering of the people in Burundi; 3. Calls on all parties to move swiftly to implement the recent peace agreements and to observe a complete ceasefire during the negotiations; 4. Calls on Mr Agathon Rwasa's FNL movement to seize the opportunity presented by the forthcoming talks with President Ndayizeye to abandon the military option and join the peace process, and asks the Burundian authorities to do their utmost to foster negotiations with that movement; 5. Calls on the African Union and its Member States exert every possible pressure on the FLN with a view to bringing it to the negotiating table with the genuine aim of seeking a peaceful political settlement; 6. Calls on the UN Security Council to consider the rapid constitution and deployment of a UN peace-keeping operation, to support the peace process at this critical moment and to strengthen and complement the African Union peace-keeping mission already deployed; also calls on the Council and Commission to increase their contribution to Burundi's peace and reconstruction process; 7. Condemns the ongoing hostilities and human rights abuses, in particular as they affect women and children, and reaffirms that there cannot be any impunity for war crimes, in particular those committed against civilians; 8. Calls, to this end, on the Government of Burundi to implement the judicial reforms provided for in the Arusha Agreements, to end impunity and to proceed with the ratification of the Statute of the International Criminal Court; 9. Calls on all States participating at the donor conference for Burundi to make sure that there are sufficient funds for human rights promotion and protection; 10. Believes that initiatives by the international community which are focused on obtaining a political settlement will be sustainable only if fundamental human rights issues are addressed at every stage of the peace and democratisation process; 11. Calls on all parties to allow the civilian population unhindered access to humanitarian aid and to encourage and facilitate the work of NGOs, especially in the health sector; RC\520070EN.doc PE 340.696} PE 340.699} PE 340.703} PE 340.706} PE 340.709} PE 340.711} RC1 EN 12. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the African Union Commission and Executive Council and the governments of Burundi, Tanzania, South Africa and the Holy See. RC\520070EN.doc PE 340.696} PE 340.699} PE 340.703} PE 340.706} PE 340.709} PE 340.711} RC1 EN .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (515Kb)
    European Community No. 26/1984 July 10, 1984 Contact: Ella Krucoff (202) 862-9540 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: 1984 ELECTION RESULTS :The newly elected European Parliament - the second to be chosen directly by European voters -- began its five-year term last month with an inaugural session in Strasbourg~ France. The Parliament elected Pierre Pflimlin, a French Christian Democrat, as its new president. Pflimlin, a parliamentarian since 1979, is a former Prime Minister of France and ex-mayor of Strasbourg. Be succeeds Pieter Dankert, a Dutch Socialist, who came in second in the presidential vote this time around. The new assembly quickly exercised one of its major powers -- final say over the European Community budget -- by blocking payment of a L983 budget rebate to the United Kingdom. The rebate had been approved by Community leaders as part of an overall plan to resolve the E.C.'s financial problems. The Parliament froze the rebate after the U.K. opposed a plan for covering a 1984 budget shortfall during a July Council of Ministers meeting. The issue will be discussed again in September by E.C. institutions. Garret FitzGerald, Prime Minister of Ireland, outlined for the Parliament the goals of Ireland's six-month presidency of the E.C. Council. Be urged the representatives to continue working for a more unified Europe in which "free movement of people and goods" is a reality, and he called for more "intensified common action" to fight unemployment. Be said European politicians must work to bolster the public's faith in the E.C., noting that budget problems and inter-governmental "wrangles" have overshadolted the Community's benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C92E Volume 47 of the European Union 16 April 2004
    ISSN 1725-2423 Official Journal C92E Volume 47 of the European Union 16 April 2004 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2003 — 2004 SESSION Sittings of 12 to 15 January 2004 Monday 12 January 2004 (2004/C 92 E/01) MINUTES PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING . 1 1. Resumption of session . 1 2. Announcements by the President . 1 3. Approval of Minutes of previous sitting . 1 4. Withdrawal of a Member's parliamentary rights . 2 5. Documents received . 2 6. Petitions . 6 7. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 7 8. Order of business . 7 9. Decision on urgent procedure (Rule 112) (vote) . 8 10. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance . 8 11. Air safety and the EU-US agreement on the transmission of personal data relative to transatlantic flights (statement followed by debate) . 9 12. Introduction of sanctions for pollution offences ***I — Transfer of cargo and passenger ships between registers ***I — Combating ship-source pollution * (debate) . 9 EN (Continued) Notice No Contents (continued) Page 13. Management of nuclear waste * — Safety of nuclear installations * (debate) . 10 14. Euratom loans for nuclear power stations * (debate) . 11 15. Agenda for next sitting . 11 16. Closure of sitting . 11 ATTENDANCE REGISTER . 12 Tuesday 13 January 2004 (2004/C 92 E/02) MINUTES PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING . 14 1. Opening of sitting . 14 2. Documents received . 14 3. Debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (announcement of motions for resolutions tabled) . 14 4. Decision on urgent procedure . 15 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
    Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001
    The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001 Troy James Piechnick Thesis submitted as part of the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program at Flinders University on the 1st of September 2016 Social and Behavioural Sciences School of History and International Relations Flinders University 2016 Supervisors Professor Peter Monteath (PhD) Dr Evan Smith (PhD) Associate Professor Matt Fitzpatrick (PhD) Contents GLOSSARY III ABSTRACT IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DEFINITIONS 2 PARAMETERS 13 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 MORE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 20 THESIS AND METHODOLOGY 24 STRUCTURE 28 CHAPTER 2 EARLY ANTECEDENTS OF IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM: 1886–1949 30 IRISH REPUBLICANISM, 1780–1886 34 FIRST HOME RULE BILL (1886) AND SECOND HOME RULE BILL (1893) 36 THE BOER WAR, 1899–1902 39 SINN FÉIN 40 WORLD WAR I AND EASTER RISING 42 IRISH DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 46 IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 1919 AND CIVIL WAR 1921 47 BALFOUR DECLARATION OF 1926 AND THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER IN 1931 52 EAMON DE VALERA AND WORLD WAR II 54 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ACT 1948 AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS 61 CONCLUSION 62 CHAPTER 3 THE TREATY OF ROME AND FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 64 THE TREATY OF ROME 67 IRELAND IN THE 1950S 67 DEVELOPING IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM IN THE 1950S 68 FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 71 IDEOLOGICAL MAKINGS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF A EUROSCEPTIC NATURE (1960S) 75 Communist forms of Irish euroscepticism 75 Irish eurosceptics and republicanism 78 Irish euroscepticism accommodating democratic socialism 85
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union
    Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union By Brian Harvey This document was commissioned by the Equality Authority and the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Equality Authority. Preface The European Union has played a valuable role in stimulating and shaping equality strategies in Ireland over the past three decades.The majority of key equality initiatives in Ireland can trace their origins to European Union directives, European case law or European Union action programmes. This influence continues to the present moment. However, innovation and ambition in our new equality legislation – the Employment Equality Act, 1998 and the Equal Status Act, 2000 – and our related equality institutions have changed this situation to one of mutual influencing. Europe now looks to the Irish experience of implementing a multi- ground equality agenda for learning. This publication provides an introductory briefing on approaches to equality at the level of the European Union – focusing on policy, institutions and funding programmes. It seeks to resource those who are engaging with the challenge to shape European Union policy and programmes in relation to equality. It aims to assist those addressing the impact of European Union policy and programmes on Ireland or to draw benefit from this influence. It is a unique document in bringing an integrated nine-ground equality focus to policy and programmes at European Union level.We are grateful to Brian Harvey for this work in drawing all this material together in this format.We are also grateful to Jenny Bulbulia B.L.
    [Show full text]
  • National Women's Council of Ireland Annual Report 2000
    National Women’s Council of Ireland Annual Report 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS National Women's Council of Ireland Annual Report - The Voice of Women in the New Millennium Who We Are - about the NWCI 3 Message from the Chairwoman 4 NWCI - The Voice of Women in the New Millennium 5 Highlights from 2000 6 • Paid Holiday Campaign • Partnership for Prosperity and Fairness negotiated • International Women's Day • Beijing +5 Meetings • NWCI Open Day • Closure of NOW • Poverty Seminar • AGM • Annual Conference • Budget 2001 • Panel Meetings • Childcare 2000 Campaign Around the Country - Affiliate Activities 10 Negotiating for Change - NWCI Policy Work 13 Beijing +5 Review 16 Projects 18 • Zest • EEI • Health Millennium Project 20 European Activities 22 Financial Report - Executive Board - Staff 23 Financial Accounts 24 List of Affiliate organisations 25 2 WHO WE ARE - ABOUT THE NWCI • Organisations where women comprise a majority of members Who We Are - About the NWCI How Do We Work With Our AffiliateOrganisations? The National Women’s Council of Ireland, Comhairle Affiliate organisations of the NWCI are encouraged to appoint Náisiúnta na mBan in Éirinn, is the national representative members to represent them at quarterly panel meetings, organisation for women and women’s groups in Ireland. Annual General Meetings, Annual Conferences, seminars and other events. We are working to make Ireland a better place for women. Our vision is the creation of a society where women can participate The four panels of the NWCI provide an effective opportunity equally in all aspects of social and economic life. for the affiliates to participate in the development of the policy within the NWCI.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Our Mistakes: the Aftermath of the American Divorce Revolution As a Lesson in Law to the Republic of Ireland
    LEARNING FROM OUR MISTAKES: THE AFTERMATH OF THE AMERICAN DIVORCE REVOLUTION AS A LESSON IN LAW TO THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND This process of learning from each other is at least as old as our nations, and its role in our development as nations has been incalculably beneficial. I would say that this process of learning from each other, far from being over, is as vital now as it has been at any point in the past. INTRODUCTION On November 24, 1995, the people of the Republic of Ireland voted in favor of ending a fifty-eight-year-old constitutional ban on divorce.2 The vote to amend the nation's 1937 constitution in order to allow divorce was secured by the narrowest margin in any Irish referendum.3 Of the 1.6 million Irish citizens who voted on the referendum, 50.3 % voted to allow divorce, while 49.7% voted against lifting the prohibition then in place.4 As a result of the vote, Ireland will amend its constitution near the end of 1996, and the Irish Parliament will enact a formal divorce bill alongside the amendment.5 Ireland's new divorce laws "will be the most conservative in Europe. "6 The Fifteenth Amendment to the Irish Constitution will do more than simply remove the constitutional ban on divorce: it will provide "the actual ground rules for divorce in Ireland. "' Specifically, before granting a divorce, an 1. Mary Robinson, ConstitutionalShifts in Europe and the United States: Learning from Each Other, 32 STAN. J. INT'L L. 1, 5 (1996).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee
    [Show full text]
  • PDF(All Devices)
    Published by: The Irish Times Limited (Irish Times Books) © The Irish Times 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of The Irish Times Limited, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation or as expressly permitted by law. Acknowledgements A large thank you to all the authors who have contributed to this eBook: Una Mullally, Ursula Halligan, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin, Benedict O Floinn, Stephen McIntyre, Patricia McKenna, Maire Geoghegan Quinn, Heather Barwick, Finn Murray, Noel Whelan, Colm Toibin, Vincent Twomey, Rosaleen, McDonagh, Kathy Sheridan, William Binchy, Diarmaid Ferriter, Breda O’Brien, Fintan O’Toole, Patrick Comerford, Colm O’Gorman, Paddy Monaghan, Derek J. Byrne, Jane Suiter, James Kelly, Juan Carlos Cordovez-Mantilla, David Hoctor, John Holden, Quentin Fottrell, Jensen Byrne, Aoife Byrne, Ronan Mullen, Ivana Bacik, Prof Ray Kinsella, Denis Staunton, Fiach Kelly, Kathy Sheridan, Stephen Collins, Marie O’Halloran, Ruadhan Mac Cormaic, Miriam Lord, Patsy McGarry and David Norris Foreword Ireland's referendum to legalise same-sex marriage was the first of its kind in the world and the campaign to change the Constitution was unlike any the country had seen before. Just over two decades after homosexuality was decriminalised in Ireland, all the political parties represented in parliament and much of civil society came together to back marriage equality. But the campaign was led by a small group of gay and lesbian activists and the most powerful arguments for change came in the form of personal testimonies of individual gay men and lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • With Compliments Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement
    Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement :w lkechpark lfoad, I· O'\rock, Duhlin 18. With l rdand. Compliments . - - ... IRISH ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT 20 Beechpark Road, Foxrock, Dublin 18 Tel. 01-895035 21st December 1987 Comrade President Oliver Tambo SPONSORS Afr ican National Congress Niall Andrews MEP P.O. Box 31791 William Artley Monica Barnes TD Lusaka Professor Kevin 8oyie Zambia Dr Noel Browne Senator Katharine Bulbulia John F Carroll Dear Comr ade President Frank Cluskey TD Sheila Conroy Fergal Costello I regre t very mu ch that I was unable to attend the Dr. Cyril Cusack Dr. Liam de Paor Movement's histori c conference of solidarity held in Arusha Margaretta D'Arcy earlier this month. Our representative, Rafique Mottiar, was Professor James Dooge Lord Dunleath able to provide a very full report about the remarkable effect Brian Farrell the confe rence had on participants and how strengthened their Fr. Austin Flannery OP John Freeman convicti on was concerning the ANC'S leadership and vitality. Seamus Heaney Michael D. Higgins TD John Hume MEP The reason for my absence was firstly due to demands Noreen Kearney at the university from which I could not withdraw. All I could do Justin Keating PC K ilroy was to pr epare a paper on the illegitimacy of the regime and look Chris Kirwan forward to your visit to Dublin next March for our rally on Tom Kitt TD Denis Larkin sanctions and solidarity. Professor Mary McAleese Sean Mc Bride SC Inez McCormack What I was able to do was to attend a meeting of the Sr .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Perspectives on Irish Homelessness)
    Perspectives on Irish Homelessness: past, present and future Edited by Dáithí Downey Cover:Layout 1 30/06/2008 18:05 Page 1 Cover:Layout 1 30/06/2008 18:05 Page 2 © Homeless Agency and respective authors, 2008 The moral right of the Author to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with Copyright law. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise except as permitted by the Irish Copyright, Designs and Patents legislation, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published in 2008 by the Homeless Agency, Parkgate Hall, 6-9 Conyngham Road, Islandbridge, Dublin 8, Ireland. ISBN: 978-0-9559739-0-1 The views expressed by contributors to this publication are personal and do not necessarily represent the views of the organisation they work for, or of the Homeless Agency, its Board of Management or its Consultative Forum. Inside:Layout 1 30/06/2008 16:42 Page 1 Perspectives on Irish Homelessness: Past, Present and Future Edited by Dáithí Downey Inside:Layout 1 30/06/2008 16:42 Page 2 CONTENTS Foreword.....................................................................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]