Speakers' Square

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Press release May 27, 2004 GET POLITICAL AT SPEAKER’S SQUARE IN TEMPLE BAR! On Sunday June 6 , local and European election candidates from across the political spectrum will converge on Speakers’ Square in Temple Bar to talk about their candidacy, the upcoming referendum and other issues they are passionate about. Starting at 2.30pm and running throughout the afternoon until 6pm, this is the first time such an event has occurred in the electoral history of Ireland and is the only chance the voting public will get to hear party representatives orate, challenge and debate with other candidates in an open forum. There are at any one time five speaking podiums on Speakers’ Square / Cearnóg na gCainteoirí, which will allow for participating candidates to be divided by their constituencies. Speakers’ Square / Cearnóg na gCainteoirí is an initiative by Rossa Ó Snodaigh in conjunction with Temple Bar Outdoors to provide a forum for city dwellers to address the public on matters that are of concern to them. Every week at Speakers’ Square / Cearnóg na gCainteoirí, intending speakers will write their names on the back of a chalkboard, and when their turn arises to speak, will write their issues on the front. Speakers will be encouraged to speak in any language, provided it's not foul language. The law of the land will apply as it does nationwide - In that it is an offence to incite hatred or slander anyone in public. Speakers’ Square / Cearnóg na gCainteoirí is part of Temple Bar Outdoors: Temple Bar Properties’ year-round programme of outdoor cultural events in the public spaces and squares of Temple Bar. For further information on Speakers’ Square / Cearnóg na gCainteoirí, please contact Rossa Ó Snodaigh at 086 8260860 / [email protected]. For media information on this or any aspect of Temple Bar Outdoors, please contact Annette Nugent/ Róisín McCarthy at Temple Bar Properties [01.6772255 / [email protected] / [email protected]. See also www.freespeech.community.ie, www.indiemedia.ie, www.templebar.ie Those who have agreed to speak Labour Party Sinn Féin Ivana Bacik (EU) Mary Lou Mac Donald (EU) Orla Farrell (Nth Ctrl) Dathaí Doolin (Sth Est) Willie Hamilton (Nth Ctrl) Robbie Seargent (Sth Ctrl) Paddy Burke (Nth Ctrl) Tony Smithers (Sth Ctrl) Dermot Lacey Ciarán Mac Anraí (Ctrl) Eric Burn (Sth Ctrl) Gearóid Ó Maol Mhichíl (Sth Ctrl) P.D’s Green Party Denis McIntyre (Nth Ctrl) Patricia McKenna (EU) John Kenny (Sth Est) Ryan Meade Tony Williams (Sth Est) Tommy Simpson Fine Gael Socialist Party Naoise Ó Muirí (Nth Ctrl) Terry Connoly (Sth Est) Dan Sullivan (Nth Ctrl) Bríd Smith (Sth Ctrl) John Barry(Sth Est) Independants Fianna Fáil Eoin Ryan Garry Keegan Those who are yet to confirm Prionsias de Rossa(L) Brian Tector (FG) Niamh Cosgrave (FG) Nessa Childers(GP) Phil Kearney(GP) Avril Doyle(FG) Mary Fitz Patrick(FF) Larry O Toole(SF) Richard Boyd Barrett(SW) ends .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Re-Tweeting Election #Ge11 Aodhán O Ríordáin TD
Re-Tweeting Election #ge11 Aodhán O Ríordáin TD 1 Re-Tweeting Election #ge11 Introduction The 2011 General Election was the first Twitter Election in Ireland. The appetite for increased engagement, accountability and interaction via the social media platform followed the resignation of Defence Minister Willie O’Dea in February 2010, in part because of a carefully composed tweet. By January 2011, Twitter was part of the daily political discourse, as candidates posted their thoughts, policies, pictures and links in the competitive war to raise profiles and attract eyeballs. The beauty of Twitter is that it allows your ‘followers’ to view you in a different lens from the normal political script, and to engage with you on a variety of topics political, personal, trivial and even philosophical. It also allows politicians break some news at appropriate times, and share views on national events without the constraints of a formal press release. This ebook is based on all the tweets published over the course of the General Election campaign, from the announcement of Labour’s motion of no confidence in the government to the day of the election result. It is important to consider that the commentary on the tweets was completed in the months immediately after the election in February 2011, when my memory of events and emotions was still raw and fresh, and not two years later. Therefore, the commentary provided is frozen in 2011 and has not been altered to take account of two years in government and developments in 2013. The tweets and reflections are frozen in time.
[Show full text]
The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
[Show full text]
Prohibition of Conversion Therapies Bill 2018
An Bille um Thoirmeasc ar Theiripí Tiontúcháin, 2018 Prohibition of Conversion Therapies Bill 2018 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated [No. 33.6 of 2018] AN BILLE UM THOIRMEASC AR THEIRIPÍ TIONTÚCHÁIN, 2018 PROHIBITION OF CONVERSION THERAPIES BILL 2018 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated CONTENTS Section 1. Interpretation 2. Prohibition of Conversion Therapy 3. Criminalisation of Conversion Therapies 4. Short title and Commencement [No.33.6 of 2018] ACT REFERRED TO Mercantile Marine Act 1955 (No. 29) 2 AN BILLE UM THOIRMEASC AR THEIRIPÍ TIONTÚCHÁIN, 2018 PROHIBITION OF CONVERSION THERAPIES BILL 2018 Bill entitled An Act to prohibit conversion therapy, as a deceptive and harmful act or practice against 5 a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression. Be it enacted by the Oireachtas as follows: Interpretation 1. In this Act— “conversion therapy”— 10 (a) means any practice or treatment by any person that seeks to change, suppress and, or eliminate a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression; and (b) does not include any practice or treatment, which does not seek to change a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression, or 15 which— (i) provides assistance to an individual undergoing a gender transition; or (ii) provides acceptance, support and understanding of a person, or a facilitation of a person’s coping, social support and identity exploration and development, including sexual orientation-neutral interventions; 20 “sexual orientation” refers to each person’s capacity
[Show full text]
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
[Show full text]
Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
[Show full text]
The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001
The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001 Troy James Piechnick Thesis submitted as part of the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program at Flinders University on the 1st of September 2016 Social and Behavioural Sciences School of History and International Relations Flinders University 2016 Supervisors Professor Peter Monteath (PhD) Dr Evan Smith (PhD) Associate Professor Matt Fitzpatrick (PhD) Contents GLOSSARY III ABSTRACT IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DEFINITIONS 2 PARAMETERS 13 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 MORE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 20 THESIS AND METHODOLOGY 24 STRUCTURE 28 CHAPTER 2 EARLY ANTECEDENTS OF IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM: 1886–1949 30 IRISH REPUBLICANISM, 1780–1886 34 FIRST HOME RULE BILL (1886) AND SECOND HOME RULE BILL (1893) 36 THE BOER WAR, 1899–1902 39 SINN FÉIN 40 WORLD WAR I AND EASTER RISING 42 IRISH DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 46 IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 1919 AND CIVIL WAR 1921 47 BALFOUR DECLARATION OF 1926 AND THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER IN 1931 52 EAMON DE VALERA AND WORLD WAR II 54 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ACT 1948 AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS 61 CONCLUSION 62 CHAPTER 3 THE TREATY OF ROME AND FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 64 THE TREATY OF ROME 67 IRELAND IN THE 1950S 67 DEVELOPING IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM IN THE 1950S 68 FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 71 IDEOLOGICAL MAKINGS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF A EUROSCEPTIC NATURE (1960S) 75 Communist forms of Irish euroscepticism 75 Irish eurosceptics and republicanism 78 Irish euroscepticism accommodating democratic socialism 85
[Show full text]
Seanad Reform Implementation Group Third Meeting
Seanad Reform Implementation Group Third Meeting - 5pm on 12th June 2018 Room 308 Department of the Taoiseach In attendance: Chair Senator Michael McDowell SC, Jack Chambers TD, Mary Butler TD, Senator Ned O’Sullivan, Thomas Byrne TD, Shane Cassells TD, Senator Ivana Bacik, Senator Alice Mary Higgins, Senator Fintan Warfield, Senator Niall O’Donnghaile, Senator Gabrielle McFadden, Senator Jerry Buttimer, Senator Maria Byrne, Senator Paddy Burke Secretariat, Department of the Taoiseach Síle de Búrca, Amanda Reilly. Apologies Fiona O’Loughlin TD, Noel Grealish TD, Tommy Broughan TD, Senator Grace O’Sullivan, Minister Shane Ross, John Brady T.D. Minutes of Meeting 1. Minutes from 2nd meeting agreed subject to names of nominees for Vice Chair being included. Agreed to publication on website. 2. Clerk of Seanad, Martin Groves, presented paper. (Appendix 1). The group thanked Mr. Groves for the detailed, informative paper. Ensuing discussion centred on - Need for Central Registrar/ Office for Seanad Elections in future - Reforms in Manning will not be able to happen overnight – implementing legislation must be modular with different rates of progress - Cost /effort involved cannot be used as reason to stymie reform – price of democracy - Some reforms can take place immediately e.g. special Panel debates - National Youth Council - timing of elections 3. Senator Ivana Bacik circulated a paper (Appendix 2) previously submitted to Manning Group and there was some discussion of matters raised. Sinn Féin offered to circulate a paper they also have on Seanad Reform (Appendix 3). 4. Next meeting 26 June 2018 @ 1700. - Revised list of topics to be will be discussed (nominating bodies to be added and list discussed by Chair and Vice Chair) - Future Experts: Franchise Section DHPLG / Dr.
[Show full text]
Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union
Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union Guide to Equality and the Policies, Institutions and Programmes of the European Union By Brian Harvey This document was commissioned by the Equality Authority and the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Equality Authority. Preface The European Union has played a valuable role in stimulating and shaping equality strategies in Ireland over the past three decades.The majority of key equality initiatives in Ireland can trace their origins to European Union directives, European case law or European Union action programmes. This influence continues to the present moment. However, innovation and ambition in our new equality legislation – the Employment Equality Act, 1998 and the Equal Status Act, 2000 – and our related equality institutions have changed this situation to one of mutual influencing. Europe now looks to the Irish experience of implementing a multi- ground equality agenda for learning. This publication provides an introductory briefing on approaches to equality at the level of the European Union – focusing on policy, institutions and funding programmes. It seeks to resource those who are engaging with the challenge to shape European Union policy and programmes in relation to equality. It aims to assist those addressing the impact of European Union policy and programmes on Ireland or to draw benefit from this influence. It is a unique document in bringing an integrated nine-ground equality focus to policy and programmes at European Union level.We are grateful to Brian Harvey for this work in drawing all this material together in this format.We are also grateful to Jenny Bulbulia B.L.
[Show full text]
National Women's Council of Ireland Annual Report 2000
National Women’s Council of Ireland Annual Report 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS National Women's Council of Ireland Annual Report - The Voice of Women in the New Millennium Who We Are - about the NWCI 3 Message from the Chairwoman 4 NWCI - The Voice of Women in the New Millennium 5 Highlights from 2000 6 • Paid Holiday Campaign • Partnership for Prosperity and Fairness negotiated • International Women's Day • Beijing +5 Meetings • NWCI Open Day • Closure of NOW • Poverty Seminar • AGM • Annual Conference • Budget 2001 • Panel Meetings • Childcare 2000 Campaign Around the Country - Affiliate Activities 10 Negotiating for Change - NWCI Policy Work 13 Beijing +5 Review 16 Projects 18 • Zest • EEI • Health Millennium Project 20 European Activities 22 Financial Report - Executive Board - Staff 23 Financial Accounts 24 List of Affiliate organisations 25 2 WHO WE ARE - ABOUT THE NWCI • Organisations where women comprise a majority of members Who We Are - About the NWCI How Do We Work With Our AffiliateOrganisations? The National Women’s Council of Ireland, Comhairle Affiliate organisations of the NWCI are encouraged to appoint Náisiúnta na mBan in Éirinn, is the national representative members to represent them at quarterly panel meetings, organisation for women and women’s groups in Ireland. Annual General Meetings, Annual Conferences, seminars and other events. We are working to make Ireland a better place for women. Our vision is the creation of a society where women can participate The four panels of the NWCI provide an effective opportunity equally in all aspects of social and economic life. for the affiliates to participate in the development of the policy within the NWCI.
[Show full text]
Labour: Working for Women
Labour: Working for Women March 2021 Contents Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………. 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….………. 7. Foreword Alan Kelly: Leader of the Labour Party …………………………………………………….. 10. Ivana Bacik: Labour Party Seanad Group Leader ………………………………………….. 11. Women in the Labour Party 13. Labour Legislating for Equality …………………………………………………………….…… 14. Labour’s Vision for Women in Ireland: Policies for Change 1. Women’s Health Labour’s Action: Legislating for Women’s Health ……………………….…………………. 16. Labour’s Vision for Women’s Health …………………………………………………………. 16. 1.1. Cervical Cancer ………………………………………………………………………… 17. 1.2. Assisted Reproduction ……………………….……………………………………….. 18. 1.3. Gynaecological Services ………………………………………………………………. 18. 1.4. Provide for Free Contraception ………………………………………………………. 18. 1.5. Enhance Early Screening ………………………………..…………………………….. 19. 1.6. HPV Vaccine Catchup …………………………………………..……………………… 19. 1.7. Sexual Health ……………………………………………………………………………. 20. 1.8. Transgender Healthcare ………………………………………………………………… 20. 1.9. Abortion ………………………………….………………………………………………. 20. 1.10. Support for Survivors of the Mother and Baby Homes and Adopted Persons .… 20. 1.11. Fund Mental Health and Primary Care Centres ………………..…………………… 21. Labour: Working for Women 2. Workers’ Rights: Women at Work 22. Labour’s Action: Legislation for Women in the Workplace …………………………..……… 23. Labour’s Vision for Women in the Workplace 2.1. A New Childcare Model: Pay Every Childcare Worker a Living Wage ……………… 24. 2.2. Support for Carers ……………………………………………………………………….
[Show full text]
Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups
European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues.
[Show full text]
Fifth Meeting - 5Pm on 10Th July 2018 Private Dining Room, Leinster House
Fifth Meeting - 5pm on 10th July 2018 Private Dining Room, Leinster House In attendance: Chair Senator Michael McDowell SC, Senator Alice Mary Higgins, Senator Fintan Warfield, Senator Gabrielle McFadden, Senator Grace O’Sullivan, Senator Ivana Bacik, Senator Jerry Buttimer, Senator Maria Byrne, Senator Paddy Burke, Secretariat, Department of the Taoiseach: Síle de Búrca, Elizabeth Lyne Invited Experts: Franchise Section DHPLG (Fiona Quinn, Barry Ryan, Mairead Ryan), Dr. Maurice Manning, Mr. Joe O’Toole Apologies Dr. Brian Hunt, Jack Chambers TD, Senator Ned O'Sullivan, Senator Niall Ó Donnghaile, Shane Cassells TD, Shane Ross TD, Tommy Broughan TD Minutes 1. Minutes from 4th meeting agreed with 1 minor amendment. 2. The Chair introduced the invited experts: Franchise Section DHPLG, Dr Manning and Mr. O’Toole. 3. The Franchise Section discussed work underway on electoral reform including the forthcoming referendum on presidential elections and the Programme for Government commitment on the establishment of an Electoral Commission. While it was acknowledged that the role of the Franchise section on Seanad Elections is limited, it was noted there is strong potential for cross-over with the Group’s work. It was advised there is considerable benefit to ensuring proposals developed by the Group are transferable and modular to the other proposed electoral reforms. 4. It was agreed by all present that the Group’s final recommendations and legislation should be produced in alignment with the Franchise Section’s work. With this in mind, the Chair will ask Brian Hunt to draft a modular bill that could be enacted in parts. 5. Both Dr Manning and Mr O’Toole contributed their expertise and experience throughout discussions, particularly in respect of discussion on voluntary registration processes, the security of online voting versus postal voting, and implementation timeframes.
[Show full text]