DOCSLIB.ORG

From Salmonberry to Sagebrush Exploring Oregon’S Native Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Salmonberry to Sagebrush Exploring Oregon’S Native Plants From Salmonberry to Sagebrush Exploring Oregon’s Native Plants An ecoregional curriculum for grades 9-12 Written by Jennie Cramer, Jody Einerson Significant contributions from: Carolyn Menke, Ian Silvernail, and Sarah Stevens Cover Art by: Paula Fong Illustrations by: Amanda Devine Jody Einerson Barbara Gleason Graphic Design by: BGleason Design © 2011 Institute for Applied Ecology P.O. Box 2855 Corvallis Oregon 97339-2855 • 541–753-3099 • www.appliedeco.org ii Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their contribution in producing From Salmonbery to Sagebrush: Exploring Oregon’s Native Plants. Special thanks to the following for their vision in making this curriculum possible Peggy Olwell—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Conservation Lead, BLM National Program Joan Seevers—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Conservation Lead BLM, Oregon/Washington Nancy Sawtelle—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Ecologist, Eugene District, Oregon In addition we have had numerous people who have acted as advisors and have contributed botanical, ecological, or educational expertise, and painstakingly edited and re-edited materials. Thank you all, your contribution has been important and appreciated. Advisory Council Teresa Matteson, Benton Soil & Water Melissa Kirkland, USFS Botanist Conservation District Jenny Lippert, USFS Botanist Heath Keirstead, Benton Soil & Water Holly LeMasurier, Middle Fork Willamette Conservation District Watershed Council Maggie Livesay, OSU Extension Faculty Tim Whitley, Rachel Carson High School 4-H Youth Development Loren Gerig, Woodburn High School Jeff Mitchell, Philomath High School Elly Veyera, Wy’east Middle School Paul Bradley, Wilson Elementary School Mary Ann Schmidt, Oregon Trout Healthy Dan Bregar, Crescent Valley High School Waters Institute Holly McRae, Willamette Resources & Jennifer Martin, Owyhee Watershed Council Education Network Jon Souder, Coos Watershed Association Sujaya Rao, OSU Faculty Rural Science Education Susan Sahnow, Oregon Natural Resource Kendra Mingo, Willamette University Botanist Education Program Brad Withrow-Bobinson, OSU Extension LeeAnn Mikkelson, Oregon Natural Resource Faculty Forestry Education Program Andy Moldenke, OSU Botany & Plant Pathology Nancy Sawtelle, BLM Plant Ecologist Dio Morales, Curriculum Design Consultant Joleen Schilling, OSU Graduate Student Eve Montanaro, Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council Content Reviewers and Resource Experts Tom Kaye, Institute for Applied Ecology Director, Melanie Gisler, Institute for Applied Ecology, Botany & Plant Pathology Restoration Ecologist Carolyn Menke, Institute for Applied Ecology, Matt Blakeley-Smith, Institute for Applied Plant Conservation Biologist Ecology, Restoration Biologist Rob Fiegener, Institute for Applied Ecology, Amanda Stanley, Institute for Applied Ecology, Native Seed Network Ecologist iii Content Reviewers and Resource Experts, continued Stacy Moore, Institute for Applied Ecology, Douglas Kendig, BLM Medford District, Botanist Environmental Education Director Teresa Matteson, Benton Soil & Water Berta Youtie, Eastern Oregon Stewardship Services Conservation District Tim Rodenkirk, BLM Coos Bay, Botanist Kathy Pendergrass, NRCS Plant Material Laura Potash Martin, Mt. Baker Snoqualmie Specialist—Oregon National Forest, Botanist Marcia Wineteer, BLM Medford District, Botanist Kristi Mergenthaler, Siskiyou Field Institute, Botanist Robert Kentta, Cultural Resources Director, Gene Yates, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Botanist Wenix Red Elk, Public Outreach & Education Katie Grenier, Deschutes/Ochoco National Coordinator, Confederated Tribes of the Forests, Botanist Umatilla Indian Reservation Reid Schuller, Botanist Misty Thorsgard, Cultural Resources, The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Marty Stein, Siuslaw National Forest, Botanist Mary Van Brocklin, Falconproof Susan Fritts, BLM Medford Distric, Botanist Piloting Teachers April Fong, Linda Wolf, Sean Kenna, Loren Gerig, Edith Moore, Kevin Celtura, Tim Whitley, Jonathan Pope, Michelle Barray, Lacy Beahm, Brian Wach, Jeff Michell Thank you to our funders USDA Bureau of Land Management—vision and creation National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Native Plant Conservation Initiative—printing and distribution Special thanks to Earth Partnership for Schools Program for acting as a model in developing place- based curriculum and for allowing us to adapt some of their materials for Oregon. University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum, 1207 Seminole Highway, Madison WI 53711. www.uwarboretum.org About Institute for Applied Ecology Founded in 1999, the Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) is a non-profit organization established to provide a service to public and private agencies and individuals by developing and communicat- ing information on ecosystems and effective management strategies. IAE offers habitat restoration services complete with habitat management plans, site preparation, maintenance and monitoring. Our Native Seed Network connects buyers and sellers of native seed while our Conservation and Research division conducts native ecosystem research and monitoring and provides surveys for rare plants. The Ecological Education Program provides opportunities for K-12 students, teachers and the adult community in place-based education and service learning projects. For additional copies of the curriculum contact: Institute for Applied Ecology P.O. Box 2855, Corvallis Oregon 97339-2855 541-753-3099 • www.appliedeco.org iv From Salmonberry to Sagebrush: Exploring Oregon’s Native Plants Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ..................................................................................................................... ix SECTION 1: PLANT IDENTIFICATION Section1: Plant Identification Section Divider ................................................................. xii 1. Botany Bouquet .......................................................................................................... 1 Explore and become familiar with plant names, and the usefulness of a common plant language. 2. Botanical Terms Challenge ........................................................................................... 5 . A plant structure and function vocabulary-building lesson using vocabulary sheets or a crossword puzzle. 3. The Secret Life of Flowers .......................................................................................... 14 An art-based activity using the flower paintings of Georgia O’Keefe for inspiration. Students dissect, observe, and record flower anatomy. 4. Drupes, Pomes, & Loculicidal Capsules: A Botanist’s Lingo for Describing Native Fruits ...22 Understand the different types of native fruits and learn to categorize them. 5 . What’s in a Name? ..................................................................................................... 27 A technology-based lesson on the importance of using scientific names. 6. Plants Have Families Too ............................................................................................ 33 Learn nine common Oregon plant families and explore the science of taxonomy. 7. Mechanics of a Key .................................................................................................... 39 Learn the basics of how a dichotomous key works and how to construct one by keying out the students in the classroom. 8. Make a Field Guide for Your School .......................................................................................45 . Construct a dichotomous key and field guide to a natural area near the school grounds. 9. Make Your Own Plant Collection ..........................................................................................5 .0 Make a herbarium of local species. Learn proper technique for collecting, pressing, labeling, mounting, and storage of the collection. 10. Create-a-Plant ........................................................................................................... 5 6 . Create a fictional plant and field guide entry to demonstrate understanding. v SECTION 2: ECOREGIONS OF OREGON Section2 ........................................................................................................................... 64 11. Explore Oregon’s Ecoregions ..................................................................................... 65 . An overview of Oregon’s eight ecoregions. Learn about the biological, climatic, and geographical diversity of the state. 12. The Place I Call Home ................................................................................................. 74 Explore what makes your or each ecoregion different from its neighbors, find out about human influences, land use, and a few of the special species that live there. 13. Ecosystem Comparisons ............................................................................................. 81 Collect data to compare and contrast different native habitats in their ecoregion. 14. An Ecosystem through an Artist’s Eye ........................................................................ 89 Explore the concept of ecological scale through art to encourage aesthetic appreciation of natural landscapes. SECTION 3: ECOLOGY of NATIVE PLANTS Section3 ........................................................................................................................... 93 15 . What’s Goin’
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oviposition Preference of Botanophila Flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) Towards Stroma Size of Epichloe¨ (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) Hosts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library BEHAVIOR Oviposition Preference of Botanophila Flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) Towards Stroma Size of Epichloe¨ (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) Hosts 1,2 3 4 1 K. GO´ RZYN´ SKA, Z. OLSZANOWSKI, A. LEUCHTMANN, AND M. LEMBICZ Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 107(2): 532Ð538 (2014); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN13094 ABSTRACT Stromata of grass-infecting fungi from the genus Epichloe¨ (Clavicipitaceae: Ascomy- cota) serve as a food source and egg-laying surface for ßies of genus Botanophila (Diptera: Antho- myiidae). Larger stromata should make it possible for ßies to lay more eggs and provide more food to offspring. This hypothesis was tested in four different grassÐfungus associations that occur in central Poland. In two of these associations, Epichloe¨ bromicola on Elymus repens and Epichloe¨ typhina on Puccinellia distans, ßies showed a preference for longer stromata, and egg density on these stromata was signiÞcantly higher than in the other two associations. A negative correlation between egg density and offspring success was observed in only one association, E. bromicola–El. repens. However, offspring success in this association did not differ signiÞcantly from offspring success in associations with lower egg density on the stromata, in which ßies showed no preference for the stroma length. Long-term observations (2000Ð2010) of ßyÐfungus interaction in the E. typhinaÐP. distans association showed that ßy preference toward stroma length may vary over time but with no clear tendency. No signiÞcant correlations were found between the larval density on a stroma and either larval weight or mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Liliaceae S.L. (Lily Family)
    Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Ben Legler Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Lilium columbianum Xerophyllum tenax Trillium ovatum Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Fritillaria lanceolata Ref.1 Textbook DVD KRR&DLN Erythronium americanum Allium vineale Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Herbs; Ref.2 Stems often modified as underground rhizomes, corms, or bulbs; Flowers actinomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals, 6 stamens, 3 carpels, ovary superior (or inferior). Tulipa gesneriana Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) “Liliaceae” s.l. (sensu lato: “in the broad sense”) - Lily family; 288 genera/4950 species, including Lilium, Allium, Trillium, Tulipa; This family is treated in a very broad sense in this class, as in the Flora of the Pacific Northwest. The “Liliaceae” s.l. taught in this class is not monophyletic. It is apparent now that the family should be treated in a narrower sense and some of the members should form their own families. Judd et al. recognize 15+ families: Agavaceae, Alliaceae, Amarylidaceae, Asparagaceae, Asphodelaceae, Colchicaceae, Dracaenaceae (Nolinaceae), Hyacinthaceae, Liliaceae, Melanthiaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae, Themidaceae, Trilliaceae, Uvulariaceae and more!!! (see web reading “Consider the Lilies”) Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Iris pseudacorus Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Photo: Yaowu Yuan Sisyrinchium douglasii Sisyrinchium sp. Iridaceae (Iris family) Iridaceae - 78 genera/1750 species, Including Iris, Gladiolus, Sisyrinchium. Herbs, aquatic or terrestrial; Underground stems as rhizomes, bulbs, or corms; Leaves alternate, 2-ranked and equitant Ref.3 (oriented edgewise to the stem; Gladiolus italicus Flowers actinomorphic or zygomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals; Stamens 3; Ovary of 3 fused carpels, inferior.
    [Show full text]
  • Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • an Elevational Zone Just Below Timberline but Above the Reach of More Or Less Continuous Tree Or Shrub Cover
    Sub-Alpine/Alpine Zones and Flowers of Mt Rainier Lecturer: Cindy Luksus What We Are Going To Cover • Climate, Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • Common Flowers, Shrubs and Trees in Sub- Alpine and Alpine Zones by Family 1) Figwort Family 2) Saxifrage Family 3) Rose Family 4) Heath Family 5) Special mentions • Suggested Readings and Concluding Statements Climate of Mt Rainier • The location of the Park is on the west side of the Cascade Divide, but because it is so massive it produces its own rain shadow. • Most moisture is dropped on the south and west sides, while the northeast side can be comparatively dry. • Special microclimates result from unique interactions of landforms and weather patterns. • Knowing the amount of snow/rainfall and how the unique microclimates affect the vegetation will give you an idea of what will thrive in the area you visit. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • The zones show regular patterns that result in “associations” of certain shrubs and herbs relating to the dominant, climax tree species. • The nature of the understory vegetation is largely determined by the amount of moisture available and the microclimates that exist. Forest Zones of Mt Rainier • Western Hemlock Zone – below 3,000 ft • Silver Fir Zone – between 2,500 and 4,700 ft • Mountain Hemlock Zone – above 4,000 ft Since most of the field trips will start above 4,000 ft we will only discuss plants found in the Mountain Hemlock Zone and above. This zone includes the Sub-Alpine and Alpine Plant communities. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • An elevational zone just below timberline but above the reach of more or less continuous tree or shrub cover.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Terminology
    PLANT TERMINOLOGY Plant terminology for the identification of plants is a necessary evil in order to be more exact, to cut down on lengthy descriptions, and of course to use the more professional texts. I have tried to keep the terminology in the database fairly simple but there is no choice in using many descriptive terms. The following slides deal with the most commonly used terms (more specialized terms are given in family descriptions where needed). Professional texts vary from fairly friendly to down-right difficult in their use of terminology. Do not be dismayed if a plant or plant part does not seem to fit any given term, or that some terms seem to be vague or have more than one definition – that’s life. In addition this subject has deep historical roots and plant terminology has evolved with the science although some authors have not. There are many texts that define and illustrate plant terminology – I use Plant Identification Terminology, An illustrated Glossary by Harris and Harris (see CREDITS) and others. Most plant books have at least some terms defined. To really begin to appreciate the diversity of plants, a good text on plant systematics or Classification is a necessity. PLANT TERMS - Typical Plant - Introduction [V. Max Brown] Plant Shoot System of Plant – stem, leaves and flowers. This is the photosynthetic part of the plant using CO2 (from the air) and light to produce food which is used by the plant and stored in the Root System. The shoot system is also the reproductive part of the plant forming flowers (highly modified leaves); however some plants also have forms of asexual reproduction The stem is composed of Nodes (points of origin for leaves and branches) and Internodes Root System of Plant – supports the plant, stores food and uptakes water and minerals used in the shoot System PLANT TERMS - Typical Perfect Flower [V.
    [Show full text]
  • Homologies of Floral Structures in Velloziaceae with Particular Reference to the Corona Author(S): Maria Das Graças Sajo, Renato De Mello‐Silva, and Paula J
    Homologies of Floral Structures in Velloziaceae with Particular Reference to the Corona Author(s): Maria das Graças Sajo, Renato de Mello‐Silva, and Paula J. Rudall Source: International Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 171, No. 6 (July/August 2010), pp. 595- 606 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653132 . Accessed: 07/02/2014 10:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Plant Sciences. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 186.217.234.18 on Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:04 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Int. J. Plant Sci. 171(6):595–606. 2010. Ó 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2010/17106-0003$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/653132 HOMOLOGIES OF FLORAL STRUCTURES IN VELLOZIACEAE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE CORONA Maria das Grac¸as Sajo,* Renato de Mello-Silva,y and Paula J. Rudall1,z *Departamento de Botaˆnica, Instituto de Biocieˆncias, Universidade
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Exclusion Between Salmonberry and Douglas-Fir in the Coast Range of Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1972 Mutual exclusion between Salmonberry and Douglas-fir in the Coast Range of Oregon Kenneth Ray Still Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Still, Kenneth Ray, "Mutual exclusion between Salmonberry and Douglas-fir in the Coast Range of Oregon" (1972). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 963. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.963 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. I. fl r I'· AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kenneth Ray Still for the Master of Science presented June 12. 1972. Title: Mutual Exclusion between Salmonberry and Douglas-fir in the Coast Range of Oregon. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITEE: Richard D. Tocher Clyde • Calvin . One serious problem faced by the forest industry in the Pacific Northwest is poor regeneration of commercial trees ~ land which is har­ vested and subsequently dominated by brush species. In Coastal Oregon, salmonberry is one of these brush species. Detailed investigations of field sites indicate that light i~tensity in the brush stands was low but sufficient for germination and early growth of Douglas-fir seedlings and soil moisture percentages and nutrient levels were high enough to support early Douglas-fir growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Samara Newsletter July & August 2020
    SamaraThe International Newsletter of the Millennium Seed Bank Partnership Special issue featuring projects and research from The Global Tree Seed Bank Programme, funded by the Garfield Weston Foundation August/September 2020 Issue 35 ISSN 1475-8245 Juglans pyriformis in the State of Veracruz Conserving and investigating native tree seeds to support community-based reforestation initiatives in Mexico Veracruz Pronatura Photo: Mexico is the fourth richest country in the world in terms of plant Millennium Seed Bank. Seed research has species diversity, after Brazil, China, and Colombia with a flora of been carried out on 314 species to study ca. 23,000 vascular plants. Around half of the plant species are their tolerance to desiccation for seed endemic and nearly 3,500 are trees. banking and to determine germination requirements to inform propagation activities. One of the key project species ELENA CASTILLO-LORENZO (Latin America Projects Coordinator, RBG Kew), MICHAEL WAY is Cedrela odorata (Spanish cedar), whose (Conservation Partnership Coordinator (Americas, RBG Kew) & TIZIANA ULIAN (Senior Research conservation status is vulnerable (IUCN Leader – Diversity and Livelihoods, RBG Kew) 2020) due to exploitation for its highly Trees and forests provide multiple goods Iztacala of the Universidad Autónoma valued wood. C. odorata is also used for and benefits for humans, such as high- de México (Fes-I UNAM). The aim medicinal purposes by local communities quality wood, fruit, honey, and other of this project was to conserve tree in Mexico, with the leaves being prepared ecosystem services, including clean water, species through a collaborative research in herbal tea to treat toothache, earache, prevention of soil erosion and mitigation of programme focusing on endemic, and intestinal infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits: Kinds and Terms
    FRUITS: KINDS AND TERMS THE IMPORTANT PART OF THE LIFE CYCLE OFTEN IGNORED Technically, fruits are the mature ovaries of plants that contain ripe seeds ready for dispersal • Of the many kinds of fruits, there are three basic categories: • Dehiscent fruits that split open to shed their seeds, • Indehiscent dry fruits that retain their seeds and are often dispersed as though they were the seed, and • Indehiscent fleshy fruits that turn color and entice animals to eat them, meanwhile allowing the undigested seeds to pass from the animal’s gut We’ll start with dehiscent fruits. The most basic kind, the follicle, contains a single chamber and opens by one lengthwise slit. The columbine seed pods, three per flower, are follicles A mature columbine follicle Milkweed seed pods are also large follicles. Here the follicle hasn’t yet opened. Here is the milkweed follicle opened The legume is a similar seed pod except it opens by two longitudinal slits, one on either side of the fruit. Here you see seeds displayed from a typical legume. Legumes are only found in the pea family Fabaceae. On this fairy duster legume, you can see the two borders that will later split open. Redbud legumes are colorful before they dry and open Lupine legumes twist as they open, projecting the seeds away from the parent The bur clover modifies its legumes by coiling them and providing them with hooked barbs, only opening later as they dry out. The rattlepods or astragaluses modify their legumes by inflating them for wind dispersal, later opening to shed their seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Species
    Appendix B: Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Plants Found in Ten Northern Rocky Mountains National Parks Introduction The Invasive Plant Management Plan was written for the following ten parks (in this document, parks are referred to by the four letter acronyms in bold): the Bear Paw Battlefield-BEPA (MT, also known as Nez Perce National Historical Park); Big Hole National Battlefield-BIHO (MT); City of Rocks National Reserve-CIRO (ID); Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve-CRMO (ID); Fossil Butte National Monument-FOBU (WY); Golden Spike National Historic Site-GOSP (UT); Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site-GRKO (MT); Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument-HAFO (ID); Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument-LIBI (MT); and Minidoka National Historic Site-MIIN (ID). The following information is contained for each weed species covered in this document (1) Park presence: based on formal surveys or park representatives’ observations (2) Status: whether the plant is listed as noxious in ID, MT, UT, or WY (3) Identifying characteristics: key characteristics to aid identification, and where possible, unique features to help distinguish the weed from look-a-like species (4) Life cycle: annual, winter-annual, biennial, or perennial and season of flowering and fruit set (5) Spread: the most common method of spread and potential for long distance dispersal (6) Seeds per plant and seed longevity (when available) (7) Habitat (8) Control Options: recommendations on the effectiveness of a. Mechanical Control b. Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Koexistence a Rozdělení Niky U Pavouků Rodu Philodromus
    Masarykova univerzita Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Koexistence a rozdělení niky u pavouků rodu Philodromus Diplomová práce Autor: Radek Michalko Brno 2012 Vedoucí DP: doc. Mgr. Stano Pekár Ph.D. 1 Souhlasím s uloţením této diplomové práce v knihovně Ústavu botaniky a zoologie PřF MU v Brně, případně v jiné knihovně MU, s jejím veřejným půjčováním a vyuţitím pro vědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, ţe převzaté informace budou řádně citovány a nebudou vyuţívány komerčně. V Brně 8.1.2012 ………………………………… Podpis 2 PODĚKOVÁNÍ Zejména bych chtěl poděkovat vedoucímu mé diplomové práce panu docentu Stanu Pekárovi, ţe mi umoţnil pracovat na tomto tématu, za trpělivé vedení a uţitečné rady. Dále bych chtěl velice poděkovat mým rodičům, bez jejichţ osobní a finanční podpory by tato práce nevznikla. Rovněţ bych chtěl poděkovat Lence Sentenské, Evě Líznarové, Pavlovi Šebkovi a Stanovi Korenkovi za podporu a cenné rady všeho druhu. 3 ABSTRAKT Koexistence a rozdělení niky pavouků rodu Philodromus V této diplomové práci byl zkoumán mechanismus umoţňující koexistenci mezi Philodromus albidus, P. aureolus a P. cespitum. Studie probíhala na území významného krajinného prvku U Kříţe v Brně Starém Lískovci. Studované území se skládá ze třech typů biotopů: listnatý les, křoviny a monokultura švestek. Pavouci byli získáváni pomocí sklepávání. U zkoumaných druhů byly porovnávány různé dimenze niky. Prostorová nika byla zkoumána na základě mikro- aţ makrobiotopových preferencí. Trofická nika byla zkoumána na základě velikosti a typu přirozené kořisti a pomocí laboratorních experimentů potravních preferencí. Časová nika byla zkoumána na základě fenologie jednotlivých druhů. Studované druhy se lišily v prostorové a trofické nice.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]