MUNOZ-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf (14.23Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MUNOZ-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf (14.23Mb) ANALYSIS OF THE SEDIMENTARY AND GEOMORPHIC SIGNATURE OF RETREATING TIDEWATER GLACIERS IN WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA BAYS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geology By Yuribia Patricia Muñoz May 2018 ANALYSIS OF THE SEDIMENTARY AND GEOMORPHIC SIGNATURE OF RETREATING TIDEWATER GLACIERS IN WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA BAYS _______________________________________________ Yuribia P. Muñoz APPROVED: _______________________________________________ Dr. Julia S. Wellner Chair of the Committee Dept. Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston _______________________________________________ Dr. Joel Saylor Dept. Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston _______________________________________________ Dr. Paul Mann Dept. Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston _______________________________________________ Dr. John B. Anderson Dept. Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences Rice University _______________________________________________ Dean College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics University of Houston ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am very grateful to have worked with Dr. Julia S. Wellner. Julia has been an advisor and a mentor since before starting my Ph.D. journey. This journey has been full of new and fulfilling experiences from a micropaleontology class in Italy to hiking in Svalbard and sailing in Antarctica. Julia has inspired me to not only be a better scientist but also to keep striving to become a better person. Thank you! I also want to thank my committee members, Dr. Joel Saylor, Dr. Paul Mann, and Dr. John Anderson for their advice and constructive feedback on this dissertation. I want to thank the crew and science parties of expeditions NBP0201, NBP0502, NBP0602A, NBP0703, NBP1001, NBP1203, and NBP1502 on board the RV/IB Nathaniel B. Palmer. In addition, expeditions ARA1304 and ANA07D on board the RV/IB Araon. Also, thanks to Dr. Kyu-Cheul Yoo, Dr. Min Kyung Lee, and Dr. Sung Han Kim that invited me to participate in the ANA07D expedition on the RV/IB Araon. The people in the LARISSA program with whom I first traveled to Antarctica: Dr. Eugene Domack, Dr. Amy Leventer, Dr. Maria Vernet, and specially Dr. Stefanie Brachfeld, were an inspiration to undertake and complete the research presented here. Dr. Charlotte Sjunneskog, Steven Petrushak, Dr. Vincent Salters, and the staff from the Antarctic Marine Research Facility at Florida State University were extremely helpful sampling cores and for that I am very thankful. I am very grateful to Dr. Claire Allen, Dr. Patricia Manley, Dr. Alastair Graham, and Dr. Stephen Livingstone for their helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved my writing. iii My friends and lab mates with whom I have spent countless hours in the lab, in the field, and also having, much needed, fun away from my desk: Proma Bhattacharyya, Janet Kong, Delaney Robinson, Rachel Clark, Alicia Staszyc, Laurin Hardin Musso, Helena Manuel, and Reham Rafe. Jennifer Campo has been the most fun partner during fieldtrips and also a great help dealing with some stubborn software. Carolina Ramon- Dueñas has also been a dear partner in fieldtrips and in the lab, may we keep having ideas to publish! Colleagues from other labs have also inspired me through their hard work and dedication: Dr. Rebecca Minzoni, Dr. Rodrigo Fernandez, Dr. Lauren Simkins, Lindsay Prothro, Ruthie Halberstadt, and Dr. Veronica Sanchez. I am definitely forgetting to include some people, but I really appreciate all the help throughout my years at UH. And finally, my family that has supported me throughout the many years of school; mis queridas hermanas y por supuesto mi madre, porque gracias a ella todo esto ha sido posible. Funding for my research was provided by the National Science Foundation through a Graduate Research Fellowship and the Office of Polar Programs grant no. OPP0739596 to Julia S. Wellner and John B. Anderson. Additional funding was provided by the Merage Foundation for the American Dream Fellowship, the Association for Women Geoscientists, the British American Foundation of Texas, the Houston Geological Society, and several scholarships from UH and the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department. iv ANALYSIS OF THE SEDIMENTARY AND GEOMORPHIC SIGNATURE OF RETREATING TIDEWATER GLACIERS IN WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA BAYS An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geology By Yuribia Patricia Muñoz May 2018 v ABSTRACT The Antarctic Peninsula (AP) is the northernmost extent of the Antarctic continent. Due to the location of this small ice cap, it is being subjected to warming earlier than the Antarctic mainland and serves as a natural laboratory to study changes in glacial stability and the resulting sediment deposits. The AP is a rapidly changing area and assessing past responses to climate events in this region would enable us to predict more accurately future trends as climatic conditions fluctuate in the AP and in other areas in Antarctica. Sediment analysis coupled with 210Pb, 137Cs, and radiocarbon dating, as well as multibeam swath bathymetry and shallow seismic (CHIRP) were used to study the modern surface sediment distribution in Flandres Bay, the geomorphic seafloor features in bays throughout the AP, and Holocene sediment cores from Flandres, Collins, and Beascochea bays. In Flandres Bay, grain size coarsens from the inner to the outer bay. Discrete areas of the bay are affected differently by varying factors to distribute sediment; these factors include persistent fast sea ice, differential rates of primary productivity, and winnowing of fine grained sediments away from the bay. The geomorphology found in the seafloor of western AP bays indicates that bay geometry exerts a control on the number and type of landform features found in the bays. We identified networks of channels carved in bedrock, likely produced by subglacial meltwater channels, which highlights the presence of subglacial meltwater production in the northern AP region, possibly through several glacial cycles. vi Results from sediment core analysis from Collins Bay suggest deglaciation started before 9280 cal. yr B.P., while in Beascochea Bay deglaciation started much later, possibly around 5910 cal. yr B.P. A recent glacial advance was interpreted in the inner bay areas of Collins, Beascochea, and Flandres bays, roughly corresponding to the Little Ice Age. This conclusion is also supported by geomorphic features found in proximal bay areas which indicate a recent glacial advance. The modern glacial retreat is observed in most bays studied in the AP indicating a common forcing mechanism, likely the intrusion of warmer water melting the glacier fronts. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. iii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... xi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 Tectonic setting of the Antarctic Peninsula ........................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 LOCAL CONTROLS ON SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND DISTRIBUTION IN FLANDRES BAY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PALEOENVIRONMENTAL INTERPRETATIONS ......................................................... 8 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 2. Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Background.................................................................................................................. 12 2.2. Setting ........................................................................................................................... 13 3. Methods ............................................................................................................................... 16 3.1. Multibeam swath bathymetry .................................................................................. 16 3.2. Sediment cores ............................................................................................................ 17 4. Results .................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1. Bathymetry .................................................................................................................. 19 4.2. Surface sediment description .................................................................................... 21 4.2.1. Sediment texture and lithology........................................................................ 21 4.2.2. Sediment facies
Recommended publications
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY of the SCOTT GLACIER and WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA
    This dissertation has been /»OOAOO m icrofilm ed exactly as received MINSHEW, Jr., Velon Haywood, 1939- GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 Geology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Velon Haywood Minshew, Jr. B.S., M.S, The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by -Adviser Department of Geology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report covers two field seasons in the central Trans- antarctic Mountains, During this time, the Mt, Weaver field party consisted of: George Doumani, leader and paleontologist; Larry Lackey, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant. The Wisconsin Range party was composed of: Gunter Faure, leader and geochronologist; John Mercer, glacial geologist; John Murtaugh, igneous petrclogist; James Teller, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant; Harry Gair, visiting strati- grapher. The author served as a stratigrapher with both expedi­ tions . Various members of the staff of the Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, as well as some specialists from the outside were consulted in the laboratory studies for the pre­ paration of this report. Dr. George E. Moore supervised the petrographic work and critically reviewed the manuscript. Dr. J. M. Schopf examined the coal and plant fossils, and provided information concerning their age and environmental significance. Drs. Richard P. Goldthwait and Colin B. B. Bull spent time with the author discussing the late Paleozoic glacial deposits, and reviewed portions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Geological Process in Illinois Glacial
    INTRODUCTION TO GEOLOGICAL PROCESS IN ILLINOIS GLACIAL PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPES GLACIERS A glacier is a flowing mass of ice. This simple definition covers many possibilities. Glaciers are large, but they can range in size from continent covering (like that occupying Antarctica) to barely covering the head of a mountain valley (like those found in the Grand Tetons and Glacier National Park). No glaciers are found in Illinois; however, they had a profound effect shaping our landscape. More on glaciers: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10ad.html Formation and Movement of Glacial Ice When placed under the appropriate conditions of pressure and temperature, ice will flow. In a glacier, this occurs when the ice is at least 20-50 meters (60 to 150 feet) thick. The buildup results from the accumulation of snow over the course of many years and requires that at least some of each winter’s snowfall does not melt over the following summer. The portion of the glacier where there is a net accumulation of ice and snow from year to year is called the zone of accumulation. The normal rate of glacial movement is a few feet per day, although some glaciers can surge at tens of feet per day. The ice moves by flowing and basal slip. Flow occurs through “plastic deformation” in which the solid ice deforms without melting or breaking. Plastic deformation is much like the slow flow of Silly Putty and can only occur when the ice is under pressure from above. The accumulation of meltwater underneath the glacier can act as a lubricant which allows the ice to slide on its base.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • A News Bulletin New Zealand, Antarctic Society
    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND, ANTARCTIC SOCIETY INVETERATE ENEMIES A penguin chick bold enough to frighten off all but the most severe skua attacks. Photo: J. T. Darby. Vol. 4. No.9 MARCH. 1967 AUSTRALIA WintQr and Summer bAsts Scott Summer ila..se enly t Hal'ett" Tr.lnsferrea ba.se Will(,t~ U.S.foAust T.mporArily nen -eper&tianaJ....K5yow... •- Marion I. (J.A) f.o·W. H.I.M.S.161 O_AWN IY DEPARTMENT OF LANDS fa SU_VEY WILLINGTON) NEW ZEALAND! MAR. .•,'* N O l. • EDI"'ON (Successor to IIAntarctic News Bulletin") Vol. 4, No.9 MARCH, 1967 Editor: L. B. Quartermain, M.A., 1 Ariki Road, Wellington, E.2, ew Zealand. Assistant Editor: Mrs R. H. Wheeler. Business Communications, Subscriptions, etc., to: Secretary, ew Zealand Antarctic Society, P.O. Box 2110, Wellington, .Z. CONTENTS EXPEDITIONS Page New Zealand 430 New Zealand's First Decade in Antarctica: D. N. Webb 430 'Mariner Glacier Geological Survey: J. E. S. Lawrence 436 The Long Hot Summer. Cape Bird 1966-67: E. C. Young 440 U.S.S.R. ...... 452 Third Kiwi visits Vostok: Colin Clark 454 Japan 455 ArgenHna 456 South Africa 456 France 458 United Kingdom 461 Chile 463 Belgium-Holland 464 Australia 465 U.S.A. ...... 467 Sub-Antarctic Islands 473 International Conferences 457 The Whalers 460 Bookshelf ...... 475 "Antarctica": Mary Greeks 478 50 Years Ago 479 430 ANTARCTI'C March. 1967 NEW ZEALAND'S FIRST DECAD IN ANTARCTICA by D. N. Webb [The following article was written in the days just before his tragic death by Dexter Norman Webb, who had been appointed Public ReLations Officer, cott Base, for the 1966-1967 summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Climate Change in Kalabaland Glacier from 2000 to 2013 S
    The Asian Review of Civil Engineering ISSN: 2249 - 6203 Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 8-13 © The Research Publication, www.trp.org.in Impact of Climate Change in Kalabaland Glacier from 2000 to 2013 S. Rahul Singh1 and Renu Dhir2 1Reaserch Scholar, 2Associate Professor, Department of CSE, NIT, Jalandhar - 144 011, Pubjab, India E-mail: [email protected] (Received on 16 March 2014 and accepted on 26 June 2014) Abstract - Glaciers are the coolers of the planet earth and the of the clearest indicators of alterations in regional climate, lifeline of many of the world’s major rivers. They contain since they are governed by changes in accumulation (from about 75% of the Earth’s fresh water and are a source of major snowfall) and ablation (by melting of ice). The difference rivers. The interaction between glaciers and climate represents between accumulation and ablation or the mass balance a particularly sensitive approach. On the global scale, air is crucial to the health of a glacier. GSI (op cit) has given temperature is considered to be the most important factor details about Gangotri, Bandarpunch, Jaundar Bamak, Jhajju reflecting glacier retreat, but this has not been demonstrated Bamak, Tilku, Chipa ,Sara Umga Gangstang, Tingal Goh for tropical glaciers. Mass balance studies of glaciers indicate Panchi nala I , Dokriani, Chaurabari and other glaciers of that the contributions of all mountain glaciers to rising sea Himalaya. Raina and Srivastava (2008) in their ‘Glacial Atlas level during the last century to be 0.2 to 0.4 mm/yr. Global mean temperature has risen by just over 0.60 C over the last of India’ have documented various aspects of the Himalayan century with accelerated warming in the last 10-15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosional and Depositional Study Guide
    Erosional and Depositional Study Guide Erosional 32. (2pts) Name the two ways glaciers erode the bed. 33. (6pts) Explain abrasion. Use the equation for abrasion to frame your answer. 34. (3pts) Contrast the hardness of ice compared to the hardness of bedrock. What is doing the abrading and why? 35. (3pts) Contrast the normal stress (weight of the ice) on the rock tool in the ice compared to the contact pressure. Are they the same, different? Why? 36. (3pts) The tools in the ice abrade along with the bedrock so the tools must be replenished for the glacier to erode over its entire base. What is the source of the tools? Explain. 37. (3pts) What is the role of subglacial hydrology in abrasion? Explain. 38. (3pts) Although we did not explicitly discuss this in class, consider abrasion and bulk erosion in a deforming subglacial till. Explain what might be happening. 39. (2 pts) Name the two ways plucking occurs. 40. (5pts) Explain how plucking occurs at a step in the bedrock. 41. (3pts) What is a roche mountonee and how does it form? 42. (3pts) Name 3 erosional landscapes created by glaciers. Do not include roche mountonee and U-shaped valley. 43. (6pts) How does a U-shaped valley form? Be specific. Depositional 44. (3pts) How does a glacier transport rock debris? 45. (3pts) Where do you find lateral moraines on a glacier and what glacial processes determine their location? Draw a plan view diagram of a glacier, identify its relevant parts and the locations of lateral moraines. 46. (3pts) In class we discussed how the vertical extent of moraines is not correlated with glacier size.
    [Show full text]
  • Crag-And-Tail Features on the Amundsen Sea Continental Shelf, West Antarctica
    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on November 30, 2016 Crag-and-tail features on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, West Antarctica F. O. NITSCHE1*, R. D. LARTER2, K. GOHL3, A. G. C. GRAHAM4 & G. KUHN3 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 3Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) On parts of glaciated continental margins, especially the inner leads to its characteristic tapering and allows formation of the sec- shelves around Antarctica, grounded ice has removed pre-existing ondary features. Multiple, elongated ridges in the tail could be sedimentary cover, leaving subglacial bedforms on eroded sub- related to the unevenness of the top of the ‘crags’. Secondary, strates (Anderson et al. 2001; Wellner et al. 2001). While the smaller crag-and-tail features might reflect variations in the under- dominant subglacial bedforms often follow a distinct, relatively lying substrate or ice-flow dynamics. uniform pattern that can be related to overall trends in palaeo- While the length-to-width ratio of crag-and-tail features in this ice flow and substrate geology (Wellner et al. 2006), others are case is much lower than for drumlins or elongate lineations, the more randomly distributed and may reflect local substrate varia- boundary between feature classes is indistinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Alpine Club Antarctic Expedition Report.Pdf
    EXPEDITION REPORT 2013 Alpine Club Antarctic Expedition December 28th 2012 – January 31st 2013 The Alpine Club team approaching the north buttress of Alencar Peak. Photo: Phil Wickens Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................1 Summary Itinerary ..............................................................1 Mountains Climbed.............................................................1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................2 MEMBERS ................................................................................4 SAILING SOUTH ........................................................................5 ACCESSING THE KIEV PENINSULA ..............................................6 ALENCAR PEAK (1592M)...........................................................7 PEAK 1333M (1333M) ..............................................................8 ‘BELGICA DOME’ (2032M) .........................................................9 VALIENTE PEAK (2270M) ........................................................10 PEAK C.1800M (C.1800M) ......................................................11 PEAK 1475M (1475M) ............................................................12 LANCASTER HILL (642M & 616M) ............................................13 RETURN JOURNEY ..................................................................14 SEA ICE .................................................................................15 WEATHER ..............................................................................16
    [Show full text]