DOCSLIB.ORG

EPZA: Scoping Report in the SEA for the Leather Industrial Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) STUDY IN THE MASTERPLAN FOR THE LEATHER INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPSED AT KINANIE- ATHI RIVER, MACHAKOS COUNTY Draft SEA Report November 2015 EPZA: SEA Process in the Masterplan for the Leather Industrial Park-1st Draft DISCLOSURE PAGE This Detailed SEA Report prepared under auspices of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Study in the Master Plan for Development of the Kinanie Leather Industrial Park is hereby disclosed as follows:- Assignment: Strategic Environmental Assessment Study in the Master Plan for Development of the Kinanie Leather Industrial Park Parties to the Contract for SEA Study: Proponent SEA Consultant Administration Building, Repcon Associates Viwanda Road off Nairobi-Namanga The Repcon Center Highway, Sigona 410 off KEFRI/KARI Rd-Muguga Athi River, Kenya P.O. Box 79605-00200, Nairobi P.O. Box 50563 00200 Telefax: 254-20-2248119; Nairobi- Kenya Mobile: +254 -721-274358; ISDN +254-45-6621000 +254 732-274358 VoIP Lines: 020-7606040/3 Email:[email protected] Mobile: +254 713-051172/3 +254 786-683222 +254 733-683222 Email: [email protected] Fanuel Kidenda Date……………….. Michael Wairagu Date……………. Chief Executive Officer SEA Team Leader ii EPZA: SEA Process in the Masterplan for the Leather Industrial Park-1st Draft Executive Summary A. Background The Government of Kenya (GOK) through its implementing agency, the Export Processing Zones Authority-EPZA is developing a Leather Industrial Park at Kinanie, Machakos County. In line with requirements of the Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) of 1999, the proposed Master Plan was subjected to a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Study conducted as per Legal Notice 101 of June 2003 and the Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment issued by NEMA. Conduct of the SEA has been managed by Repcon Associates (NEMA Firm of Experts No. 0002), a Nairobi based consultancy duly registered and licensed by NEMA. The Detailed SEA Study stage which culminated in this report investigated likely economic, social and environmental impacts associated with the Masterplan proposals and identified mitigation measures that need to be put in place to ensure that the development and implementation of the Masterplan will be carried out in a sustainable manner. The SEA also identified options to enhance the technical sustainability, economic viability, and social acceptability in the implementation of the Masterplan. B. The Master Plan for the Proposed Leather Industrial Park The Masterplan for the Leather Industrial Park (LIP) has been conceived by the Ministry of Industrialization and Enterprise Development (MOIED) through the EPZA as a Kenya Vision 2030 flagship project targeting to enhance contribution of Manufacturing GDP growth to the national economy. The Masterplan proposes to create a Leather Industrial Park targeting Value additional and transformative research and innovation towards unlocking economic potential of the Leather sector in Kenya. The Masterplan for LIP targets LR 23961-a 301ha property situated on the banks of the Mbagathi River in Kinanie Division about 16 kilometers along the Mutonguni (E434) road between Athi River and Kangundo Rd. On the ground, the site is occupied by a Eucalyptus plantation located next to a sewerage treatment plant that handles sewerage delivered from the Athi River based EPZA complex through a 16km pipeline. Proposals for development as per the Masterplan include establishment of Infrastructure in form of 5Kms each of paved road, street lighting and sewerline, a power substation, boreholes for water supply, storm water drainage, culverts and a Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) in a site that is currently a forest plantation. The Masterplan proposes a phased development of 36 tanneries each to seat on a one ha plot complemented by an 18 leather value addition parks developed for purposes of transforming the leather produced into high value finished products for export. The VAPs will be complemented by SME parks and a Trade Center mainly for promoting and marketing high quality leather trade. Activities in Tanning and Value Addition will be underpinned by a Research and Development Centre charged with promoting development of leather industry mainly in quality control in processing and production of quality skins and hides together with leather industry information dissemination. Other support services in the LIP include an Administration Centre, Logistics and Customs area, and a housing estate comprised of 1,200 assorted units. Development of the proposed leather industrial park is in line with the objectives of the national industrial policy framework of creating an enabling environment for industrial development, enhancing value addition, and promoting development of SMEs. The export oriented park is legally anchored under the EPZA Act Cap 517 and will adhere to all laws and policies relevant in Kenya. C. Objectives and key milestones in the SEA Study This SEA Process is aligned to the broad objectives for SEA Studies identified by NEMA in the recently issued National Guidelines for SEA where the overriding goal is to ensure that a proposed PPP is compatible with sustainable environmental planning and management. Conduct of the SEA process is iii EPZA: SEA Process in the Masterplan for the Leather Industrial Park-1st Draft guided by the Legal Framework for environmental management in Kenya as provided by the National Constitution and the Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) 1999 and its legal tools. In conformity with this, core milestones have been achieved as follows:Screening Study: Screening was undertaken to determine whether the proposed Master Plan required a SEA process. After consultations with NEMA, it was determined that a SEA would be required. Scoping Study: Scoping of this SEA was carried out to define the scale of investigations to be undertaken during the detailed SEA stage. A SEA Scoping Report was prepared and submitted to NEMA. Detailed SEA Study: Core highlights of Detailed SEA Stage activities include: i) Situation analysis: Secondary data, especially on the pre-project baseline, was extracted from diverse reports, planning documents, etc obtained either from stakeholders or existing sources. Of critical importance were planning documents such as strategic plans from stakeholders which were analyzed towards collaborating and defining stakeholder interests and potential points of conflict with the proposed Master Plan. ii) Intensified Stakeholder analysis and consultation: Given the expectation for SEA studies to map potential areas of conflict between proposed Masterplan and existing stakeholder interests, considerable effort was invested in identifying, engaging and analyzing stakeholders. Such process proved quite useful in clarifying stakeholder interests, concerns and aspirations while providing useful linkage to other stakeholders and information. iii) Analysis of alternatives: The SEA study identified and analyzed alternative investment -use options against goals for meeting Vision 2030 objectives while sustaining environmental and social quality. iv) Identification of Impacts and their mitigation/enhancement: The SEA focused on significant impacts, both positive and negative, with a view of mitigating the adverse and enhancing the good. The efforts have been made to identify and highlight cumulative and induced impacts which may not be easily captured during the project specific IEE/IEA downstream. v) Formulation of an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP): The SEA process culminated in formulation of a tool to guide resolution of anticipated impacts both at the current (planning) and downstream implementation stages. D. Findings from the SEA Study: This SEA made numerous findings which, if applied, can greatly shape focus of the Master Plan towards securing a socially acceptable, technically viable and environmentally sustainable development of DK area. Key salient findings are highlighted below. The prevailing biophysical baseline: From the baseline characterization study, it emerged that the Mbagthi-Athi River basin in which the LIP will be situated is a water scarce area on account of aridity and overexploitation of available water as such, water to support operations of the LIP as currently conceived may not be available. It further emerged that, on account of draining Nairobi, Thika, Machakos, Athi River and other towns, the Mbagathi-Athi system already suffers a huge pollution load which already comprises viability of this river as a source of water supply for downstream communities. Stakeholders are supportive but also concerned: The SEA Team identified and consulted many stakeholders either through private interviews or public hearing meetings that culminated in a Disclosure workshop hosted by the EPZA at the Technology Development Center-TDC. The SEA Study encountered a charged ground comprised of residents who are aggrieved by the nuisances, disease and accidents hazards associated with operation of the EPZA owned iv EPZA: SEA Process in the Masterplan for the Leather Industrial Park-1st Draft sewer infrastructure. Indeed, failure by authorities to reign in operations of exhauster truck operators who often vandalize manhole covers and dump human waste in non-designated areas dominated any public forum arranged for the SEA. All stakeholders have however affirmed that they are not opposed to the proposed Leather Industrial Park. Investor interest at Kinanie: Investor interest in Kinanie
Recommended publications
  • A Water Infrastructure Audit of Kitui County

    A Water Infrastructure Audit of Kitui County

    Research Report Research Report Sustainable WASH Systems Learning Partnership A WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AUDIT OF KITUI COUNTY Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford January 2019 PHOTO CREDIT:PHOTO CLIFF NYAGA/UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Prepared by: Cliff Nyaga, University of Oxford Reviewed by: Mike Thomas, Rural Focus; Eduardo Perez, Global Communities; Karl Linden, University of Colorado Boulder (UCB); and Pranav Chintalapati, UCB. Acknowledgements: The Kitui County Government would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Further, the Kitui County Government appreciates its longstanding partnership with the University of Oxford and UNICEF Kenya through various collaborating programs, including the DFID-funded REACH Program. The leadership received from Emmanuel Kisangau, Kennedy Mutati, Philip Nzula, Augustus Ndingo, and Hope Sila — all from the County Ministry for Water Agriculture and Livestock Development — throughout the audit exercise is appreciated. The sub-county water officers were instrumental in logistics planning and in providing liaison between the field audit teams, communities, and County Ministries for Agriculture, Water, and Livestock Development and Administration and Coordination. A team of local enumerators led field data collection: Lucy Mweti, Grace Muisyo, Abigael Kyenze, Patrick Mulwa, Lydia Mwikali, Muimi Kivoko, Philip Muthengi, Mary Sammy, Ruth Mwende, Peter Musili, Annah Kavata, James Kimanzi, Purity Maingi, Felix Muthui, and Assumpta Mwikali. The technical advice and guidance received from Professor Rob Hope of the University of Oxford and Dr. Andrew Trevett of UNICEF Kenya throughout the planning, data collection, analysis, and preparation of this report is very much appreciated. Front cover: This Katanu Hand pump was developed in the late 1990s by the Government of Kenya and is the main water source for Nzamba Village in Ikutha Ward, Kitui.
  • Limuru Tea PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements

    Limuru Tea PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements

    LIMURU TEA PLC Annual Report & Financial STATEMENT 2020 2 LIMURU TEA PLC (formerly Limuru Tea Company Limited) ANNUAL REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020 3 Table of Contents Page Corporate information 4 Notice of Annual General Meeting 5 – 6 Chairman’s statement 7 – 8 Report of the directors 9 Directors’ remuneration report 10 – 11 Board of Directors and Directors’ profiles 12 – 14 Corporate governance 15 – 17 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 18 Report of the independent auditors 19 – 23 Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 26 Statement of financial position 27 Statement of changes in equity 28 Statement of cash flows 29 Notes to the financial statements 30 – 56 Principal shareholders and share distribution schedule 57 Proxy form 58 – 59 4 LIMURU TEA PLC (formerly Limuru Tea Company Limited) Corporate Information BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dr. Richard Korir Chairman Gerridina Johanna Maria Ten Den* Felgona Omollo Dorcas Muli Samson Korir Florence Mitei Kirui - resigned effective 1st April 2021 Felix Mutai - appointed effective 1st April 2021 *Dutch COMPANY SECRETARY Alison I.N Kariuki, LLB, M.A (staffs) CPS (K) REGISTERED OFFICE Nakuru – Kericho Highway PO Box 20 20200 – Kericho PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Limuru Tea Plc PO Box 1 00217 Limuru Telephone: 020 - 2489737 AUDITOR REGISTRARS KPMG Kenya Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited 8th Floor, ABC Towers Co-operative House, Haile Selassie Avenue Waiyaki Way PO Box 48231 PO Box 40612 00100 Nairobi GPO 00100 Nairobi GPO ADVOCATES Dentons
  • Geology of the Nairobi Region, Kenya

    Geology of the Nairobi Region, Kenya

    % % % % % % % % %% %% %% %% %% %% %% % GEOLOGIC HISTORY % %% %% % % Legend %% %% %% %% %% %% %% % % % % % % HOLOCENE: %% % Pl-mv Pka %%% Sediments Mt Margaret U. Kerichwa Tuffs % % % % %% %% % Longonot (0.2 - 400 ka): trachyte stratovolcano and associated deposits. Materials exposed in this map % %% %% %% %% %% %% % section are comprised of the Longonot Ash Member (3.3 ka) and Lower Trachyte (5.6-3.3 ka). The % Pka' % % % % % % L. Kerichwa Tuff % % % % % % Alluvial fan Pleistocene: Calabrian % % % % % % % Geo% lo% gy of the Nairobi Region, Kenya % trachyte lavas were related to cone building, and the airfall tuffs were produced by summit crater formation % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Pna % % % % %% % (Clarke et al. 1990). % % % % % % Pl-tb % % Narok Agglomerate % % % % % Kedong Lake Sediments Tepesi Basalt % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %% % % % 37.0 °E % % % % 36.5 °E % % % % For area to North see: Geology of the Kijabe Area, KGS Report 67 %% % % % Pnt %% % PLEISTOCENE: % % %% % % % Pl-kl %% % % Nairobi Trachyte % %% % -1.0 ° % % % % -1.0 ° Lacustrine Sediments % % % % % % % % Pleistocene: Gelasian % % % % % Kedong Valley Tuff (20-40 ka): trachytic ignimbrites and associated fall deposits created by caldera % 0 % 1800 % % ? % % % 0 0 % % % 0 % % % % % 0 % 0 8 % % % % % 4 % 4 Pkt % formation at Longonot. There are at least 5 ignimbrite units, each with a red-brown weathered top. In 1 % % % % 2 % 2 % % Kiambu Trachyte % Pl-lv % % % % % % % % % % %% % % Limuru Pantellerite % % % % some regions the pyroclastic glass and pumice has been
  • Bamburi Construction Solutions for Building Better Cities

    Bamburi Construction Solutions for Building Better Cities

    BAMBURI CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS FOR BUILDING BETTER CITIES Annual Report and Financial Statements 2014 MORE HOUSING 2 BAMBURI CEMENT LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2014 CONTENTSCONTENTS GROUP INFORMATION 4 2014 HIGHLIGHTS 6 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS 8 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 12 INTERVIEW WITH THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 14 OUR BUSINESS IN REVIEW WHAT WE DO 18 VALUE ADDED STATEMENT 19 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROFILES 22 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM 24 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 26 RISK PROFILE 29 SHAREHOLDER PROFILE 31 OUR OPERATIONS IN REVIEW KENYA 34 UGANDA 35 BUILDING THE BRANDS 36 OUR SYSTEMS 37 BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS BUILDING COMMUNITIES 38 BUILDING SUSTAINABLY 41 BUILDING A CIRCULAR ECONOMY 41 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 42 FINANCIAL REVIEW 46-114 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 118 PROXY FORM 119 3 BAMBURI CEMENT LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2014 GROUP INFORMATION Our Vision To delight our customers with innovative construction solutions while being committed to Ownership sustainability. We are committed to doing things differently and drive for results by thinking creatively so as to offer practical solutions to our customers through the Our Values involvement of all employees and contractors to We are committed to sustaining a culture that ensure the success of the organization. embodies Company values of Ownership, Accountability and Ambition among employees and contractors to drive priorities for the business. MORE CONNECTED Our Priorities To enable us achieve our vision, the Group identified priorities 4. Cost Management in six key areas: To be the lowest delivered cost in our markets through management of variable costs as well as the consistent 1.
  • Bamburi Company Profile

    Bamburi Company Profile

    BAMBURI VISION To delight our customers with innovative construction solutions while being CEMENT committed to sustainability LIMITED CONTENTS About Bamburi Cement Limited 4 Our Values 5 About LafargeHolcim 6 Our Business is based on four Strategic Pillars 7 Our Commitment 8 Some Of Our Partners 9 Customer Testimonials 10 Product Proposition 11 Nguvu 32.5 R 12 Tembo 32.5 N 13 Powermax 42.5 14 Powerplus 42.5 15 Powercrete 52.5 16 Roadcem HRB E3 17 Bamburi Readymix Concrete 18-19 Bamburiblox 20-21 Bamburi Precast Concrete 22 Available On Order 23 Our Quality Statement 24 Cement Quality Control 25 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Nguvu 32.5 R 26-27 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Tembo 32.5 N 28 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Powermax 42.5 29 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Powerplus 42.5 30 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Powercrete 52.5 31 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Readymix Concrete 32 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Bamburiblox 33 Kenya Bureau of Standards Certification - Bamburi Concrete 34-35 Research & Development at LafargeHolcim 36 Major Projects Undertaken Using Our Cement 37-40 Value Addition 41 Skilled People, Facilities, Processes & Culture 42 Bamburi Mobile Concrete Laboratory 43 Maskani (Affordable Housing) 44 Bamburi M-Service 45 Other Value Added Services 46 Silo Storage Capability 47 Payment Information 48 Contacts 49 3 ABOUT BAMBURI CEMENT LIMITED Bamburi Cement Limited (BCL) A subsidiary of LafargeHolcim, the world leader in the building materials industry. Two Plants located in Mombasa and Athi River respectively. COUNTRIES EMPLOYEES Hima Cement Limited (HCL) Uganda based subsidiary with a Plant located in Hima, Kasese.
  • Republic of Kenya Ministry of Roads and Publicworks Feasibility Study, Detailed Engineering Design, Tender Administration and C

    Republic of Kenya Ministry of Roads and Publicworks Feasibility Study, Detailed Engineering Design, Tender Administration and C

    ORIGINAL REPUBLIC OF KENYA COPY A I P O MINISTRY OF ROADS AND PUBLICWORKS I H T E O T T HI KA R IV ER CHANIA THIKA FEASIBILITY STUDY, DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN, TENDER ADMINISTRATION AND THIKA CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION OF NAIROBI – THIKA ROAD (A2) PHASE 1 AND 2 JUJ A FEASIBILITY AND DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN RUIRU ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT GITHURAIASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT KASSAR ANI FINAL REPORT RUARKA ` MUTHAI JULY 2007 GA PANGA MUSE NI UM NAIROBI GLOBE CINEMA R/A CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED 57, NEHRU PLACE, (5TH FLOOR), NEW DELHI - 110 019 in association with APEC LIMITED, NAIROBI Nairobi – Thika Road Upgrading project Sheet 1 of 88 2007025/Report 2/Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study Report Proponent: Ministry of Roads and Public Works. Activity: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study on the proposed Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Nairobi – Thika road, A2. Report Title: Environmental Project Report (Scoping): Proposed Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Nairobi – Thika Road, A2. Consulting Engineers Consulting Engineers Services (India) Private Limited In association with APEC Consortium Limited P. O. Box 3786 – 00100, NAIROBI, KENYA, Tel. 254 020 606283 NEMA Registration No. 0836 of Firm of Experts: Signed: ____________________________ Date: _____________________ Mr. Harrison W. Ngirigacha (MSc. WERM, BSc. Chem. Reg. Expert (NEMA)) LEAD EIA EXPERT NEMA Reg. No. 0027 For: Consulting Engineers Name and Address of Proponent: The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Roads and Public
  • Kenya, Groundwater Governance Case Study

    Kenya, Groundwater Governance Case Study

    WaterWater Papers Papers Public Disclosure Authorized June 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA GROUNDWATER GOVERNANCE CASE STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized Albert Mumma, Michael Lane, Edward Kairu, Albert Tuinhof, and Rafik Hirji Public Disclosure Authorized Water Papers are published by the Water Unit, Transport, Water and ICT Department, Sustainable Development Vice Presidency. Water Papers are available on-line at www.worldbank.org/water. Comments should be e-mailed to the authors. Kenya, Groundwater Governance case study TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................. vi ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................ xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... xiv 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. GROUNDWATER: A COMMON RESOURCE POOL ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2. CASE STUDY BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................
  • Influence of Institutional Factors on Pupils

    Influence of Institutional Factors on Pupils

    INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS ON PUPILS’ PERFORMANCE IN KENYA CERTIFICATE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION IN PUBLIC PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN KANGUNDO DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA Timothy Musyoka Nthumo A Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Education in Educational Administration University of Nairobi 2015 DECLARATION This research project is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. __________________________ Timothy Musyoka Nthumo E55/83715/2012 This research project has been submitted with our approval as university supervisors. _________________________ Dr. Mari Nelson Lecturer Department of Educational Administration and Planning University of Nairobi __________________________ Dr. Rose Obae Lecturer Department of Educational Administration and Planning University of Nairobi ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my wife Tabitha Musyoka, my children Dickson Kioko, Elizabeth Syokau, Solomon Ngete, my sister in-law Ruth Munyiva and my parents Samuel Nthumo and Naom Nthumo, for their patience , support and inspiration. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The successful completion of this study has been due to cooperation, assistance and encouragement of many people. Sincere appreciation to my concerned supervisors Dr. Mari Nelson and Dr. Rose Obae both lecturers in the Department of Educational Administration and Planning at the University of Nairobi for their insight, scholarly criticisms, friendly guidance and direction throughout the entire period of study, my deep gratitude also goes to the library staff for their invaluable assistance. My gratitude would be incomplete without expressing my heartily thanks to my wife Tabitha Mutindi who gave all the love, moral support and encouragement throughout the study.
  • Nairobi-Thika-Transp

    Nairobi-Thika-Transp

    FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce this 10-plan year which is a road map on how the Nairobi - Thika Superhighway Transport Corridor (NTTC) is geared to develop. This is the first comprehensive spatial plan covering the NTTC, which is within Ruiru and Juja Sub-Counties and it has been prepared at a time when Kiambu County is grappling with the challenges of tackling rapid urbanisation. I am happy to note that, this plan has been prepared in a participatory manner taking into account the contributions of various stakeholders whose role in the implementation of the proposals is fundamental. Kiambu is the third most urbanised County after Nairobi and Mombasa and has witnessed rapid urbanisation in the few decades with people moving into the County to settle, set business, and undertake other development activities. The NTTC has witnessed rapid urbanisation coupled with high population growth and economic activities in the last ten years since the onset of devolved government and the upgrading of the Nairobi-Thika Highway thus changing the corridor’s character. Due to this rapid growth as a County, we are expected to commit more investments to cope with this expansion. More people need to be accommodated in a suitable environment with ease of movement, adequate physical and social infrastructure and employment opportunities. However, most of this urbanisation is happening with little or no planning intervention as characterised by piecemeal subdivision and land-use conversions. Due to the absence of planning tools like the Plan to guide and manage this rapid urbanisation, the current development in these areas is suffering from uncoordinated growth, land use conflict, inadequate basic infrastructure facilities and services, poor housing, and inefficient public transportation system, amongst other challenges.
  • Industrialization of Athi River Town

    Industrialization of Athi River Town

    \l INDUSTRIALIZATION OF ATHI ( f RIVFR TOWN ' BY CALEB (m o * MIRERI This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requ i rements of the degree of Masters of Arts in Planning in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Development of the University of Nairobi. May 21st., 1992 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Cand idate---- 's“-— ^ ------ ignature ) Caleb Mc’Mireri DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING Faculty of Architecture. Design and Development P. 0. Bex 3 0 19 7 . Tel. 2 7 4 41 UNIVERSITY Of NAIROBI. This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as the University Supervisor. S i g n e d -^*3^l __ Dr. George Ngugi (Supervisor) June 21st, 1992. ITT DEDICATION In Memorium of Jaduong’ James Mireri IV Acknowledgement A great many people helped me develop this thesis most of whom I cannot mention their names here. 1 am indebted to them all but in particular to my Supervisor Dr. George Ngugi of the University of Nairobi. His comments were consistently thoughtful and insightful and he persistently sought to encourage and support me. Also, Dr. Peter Ngau of the University of Nairobi gave me a far reaching support throughout the time of this thesis writing, by his incisive comments. T also want to thank all academic members of staff and students of D.U.R.P, who listened to the early versions of this study in seminars and the information they offered was of great help.
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis

    KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis

    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
  • 5.8 Result of Test Drilling at 3 Target Communities

    5.8 Result of Test Drilling at 3 Target Communities

    5.8 Result of Test Drilling at 3 Target Communities Depth Depth (GL-m) (GL-m) Well structure Geological log Discription Well structure Geological log Discription Well structure Geological log Discription 0 Top red soil 11" Top clay soil Top red soil 0 11" 2 2.8 2 1.2 11" 2 3.6 Highly weathered gneiss 11" 6 11" Highly weathered gneiss Permanent 6" Slightly weathered gneiss 11" Permanent 8 Weathered gneiss Casing 8 10 Permanen 6" Biotite gneiss Casing 6" 10 Weathered gneiss 10 t Casing 6"uPCV 14 Slightly weatered gneiss Bentonite Partly weathered gneiss 14 16 Casing Biotite gneiss Seal 18 Slightly weathered gneiss 20 6"uPCV 18 Weathered gneiss 19.0 20 Massive Bentonite Casing 22 Seal 22 Partly weathered biotite gneiss Bentonite 6"uPCV 25.0 Weathered gneiss biotite gneiss 27.0 Seal Casing 28 28 30 30 30.0 Highly weathered gneiss 30 31.0 31.0 32 6"uPCV Weathered trachyte 33.0 Gravel 34.0 6"uPCV Screen 36 Packing Partly fractured Screen Weathered & fractured 40 Gravel 40.0 φ2-9mm biotite gneiss gneiss 40 Packing 43.0 Gravel Packing 44 φ2-9mm 46.0 6"uPCV Bbiotite gneiss Screen 48 φ2-9mm 48.0 48 50 49.0 Massive 50 52.0 52 biotite gneiss 51.0 54.0 55.0 Partly weathered Partly fractured biotite gneiss A5-8-1 58.0 60 61.0 biotite gneiss 61.0 60 60.0 Slightly weathered gneiss 60 64.0 Massive 67.0 biotite gneiss 66.0 70 70.0 70 73.0 73.0 72 Partly fractured 72.0 72 76.0 76 biotite gneiss 75.0 78.0 80 80 79.0 80 82.0 Biotite gneiss Weathered gneiss 85.0 84 85.0 84.0 Massive 90 91.0 91.0 biotite gneiss 90.0 90 90 94.0 Fractured biotite gneiss 94.0 100 100.0 100.0 100 103.0 103 103.0 103 110 110 5.9 Result of Wind Velocity Survey Possible Term to Start Pump up and Possible Time to Work about Windmill Pump Possible Term to Start Possible Time to Work（Hour） District Site No.