e s U l a r u R
s e c r u o s e R l a r u t a N f o t n e m t r a p e D a n a i d n I d n a y e v r u S l a c i g o l o e G . S . U : s e c r u o S a t a D
D G M 0 0 5 > 2 1 0
N
S "
y t n u o C n o s n h o J
y l p p u S c i l b u
P ¸#
D G M 0 0 5 - 0 0 1
s e l i M
. c s i M ¸#
D G M 0 0 1 - 0 5
n i e s U d n
¸# a S " n o i t a g i r r I
y t i C D G M 0 5 - 0 1
y r t s u d n
I ¸#
D G M 0 1 <
y t n u o C
s e c r u o s e R r e t a W
g n i n i M / y g r e n
E ¸#
) D G M ( w o l F 2 Q 7 e t a t s r e t n I
E K A T N I L L E
¸# W
r e v i R
s e k a L r o j a M
n o i t a c o L l a w a r d h t i W
y t i n u m m o C r e s U S I G e h t d n a , o p o t s s i w s , P G I , N G I , d i r g o r e A , g n i p p a m t e G , X E A , S G S U , A D S U , d e b u c - i , e y E o e G , e b o l G l a t i g i D , i r s E : e c r u o S
d
B r o w n
o
B
r o w n
o
r M o r g a n
J e o h n
s o n
w
B r a
o h t o l
e m
w v t i
f
i
R
B a
r
t h
o
l
o
m e w J o h
n s r o n
D
S e h y b l S "
S "
s e k a L
h g r u b n i d E
s e c n i r P
S "
n w o t n a g r o
¸# M g i B
# B ¸l
u
e
R ¸# i
v # e ¸
r ¸#
¸#
S "
r a g l a f a r
¸# T
S "
n i l k n a r F J
M
o
o
5 h
6 r
n
-
g
I
s
¨ ¦ § a
o
n
n
S
" ¸# ¸#
e l l i v s r e g r a B
J
S
o
h h
e n
l
s
b
o
y
n
S
" ¸# d n a l e t i h W ¸#
S
" ¸#¸#
W
h
i t e
R
d n a l e t i h W
i v
e
w e N r
¸#
S " ¸#
¸#
S "
d o o w n e e r ¸#¸# G
¸#¸# M o r g a n
M a r i o n J o h n s o n
M a r i o n
S M ¸#
h
a
e
r
i
l
§ ¨ ¦ 4 o
b
7
- n
y I ¸# ¸#
¸#
S "
S " ¸#¸#¸# ¸# ¸#¸# Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Kyle J. Hupfer, Director Aquifer Systems Map 18-B
R. 4 E. R. 5 E. The occurrence of bedrock aquifers depends on the original composition of the rocks and
R. 3 E. R. 4 E. subsequent changes which influence the hydraulic properties. Post-depositional
E
d
0
R. 2 E. R. 3 E. R
0 processes, such as jointing, fracturing, and solution activity, generally increase the
s
3
b
d d 27 hydraulic conductivity (permeability) of the upper portion of bedrock aquifer systems.
m 28 a
R o 29
o 30 f 25 26C Because permeability is generally greatest near the bedrock surface, bedrock units within f R L F 27 lu 28 e la y a t
29 t B B 30 Pl th the upper 100 feet are commonly the most productive aquifers. 25 eas n e 26 a r 27 nt u r 28 C a 30 29 ree o R k u n C n C c Bedrock aquifer systems in the county are overlain by unconsolidated deposits of varying r h
d e d
R e thickness. Most of the bedrock aquifers in the county are under confined conditions. In Le R at k s he rwo n o w d other words, the potentiometric surface (water level) in most wells completed in bedrock
Greenwood i Creek
l
e k h County Road 950 N t 34
n 33 rises above the top of the water-bearing zone. a
a 31 32
36 r M ney 35 F o C 34 d H re 33 ek 32 R 31 The yield of a bedrock aquifer depends on its hydraulic characteristics and the nature of 34 35 36 33 m 32 a T. 14 N. the overlying deposits. Shale and glacial till act as aquitards, restricting recharge to
31 h
a Rocklane r T. 13 N. underlying bedrock aquifers. However, fracturing and/or jointing may occur in aquitards, er G which can increase recharge to the underlying aquifers. Hydraulic properties of the White R iv Smith Valley Rd T. 14 N. 3 bedrock aquifers are highly variable. 65 Allen Rd d 375 E 4 ¦¨§ 6 5 Rocklane Rd T. 13 N. 2 1 d 4 3 The susceptibility of bedrock aquifer systems to surface contamination is largely R Curry Rd 6 5 nty Roa k dependent on the type and thickness of the overlying sediments. Because bedrock aquifer c 3 2 1
5 o 4 d
T E Cou
6 County Road 325 E systems may have complex fracturing systems, once a contaminant has been introduced
d u
r 0 a ke
y 0 37 P P into a bedrock aquifer system it will be difficult to track and remediate.
6 e E
n Cre N e 00 d ad 8 0 k County Ro d
a
SR 5
R
o
2 10
C t 9 t uts 8 R
d in
g d Three bedrock aquifer systems are identified for Johnson County. They are, from west to i er
d Rd 7
r
a
y
R
R
e t
11o
12 k v
n east and youngest to oldest: the Borden Group of Mississippian age; the New Albany x 10 R
C e
u
ff i lu r A 9
B e e
o y e n
r 8 k t
i Demaree Rd 7 Shale of Devonian and Mississippian age; and Silurian and Devonian Carbonates.
l
C
n
l C
12 00 N h u Road 7 rt u 11 County o 10 y
N 9 o
e
M C 8 C
7 n o o
H E
u
H 5
o n 7 n t Mississippian -- Borden Group Aquifer System y d 5 e Crossing R Stones
R
T y d
r a
a C o o 15 v 17 16 a i d s r R
18 C e re 6 ek y
e 13 t 14 7
k 15 n
0 In Johnson County, the Mississippian age Borden Group Aquifer System is present in 16 u k L 17 E 18 e o i most of the western half of the county. This bedrock aquifer system is composed mostly
13 e C 14 t 15 r t 17 16 C l 18 e of siltstone and shale, but fine-grained sandstones are also common. Although
d k Travis R y S e s carbonates are rare, discontinuous interbedded limestone lenses are present, mostly in the u e s County Road 575 N g r a
ounty Road 600 N r a upper portion of the group. C C r G
y ad 550 N New t C County Ro s s
s 21 a 20 r a E 19 e 22 The Borden Group in Johnson County is up to 600 feet thick and generally thins as it dips Bluff d Whiteland
r e
d 24
R 23 k
22 to the southwest beneath younger rock formations. Depth to bedrock is typically 20 to 70
R
G
Creek n 21
19 20 k
w w
e feet. Well depths in the Borden Group Aquifer System range from 10 to 375 feet.
o o 24
t 22 23 e
R r
21 n k 31 However, wells are typically completed at depths of 55 to 125 feet and typically penetrate
20 a ut y e
19 B C g
e e lu r k r
f S o 10 feet or less of bedrock. o f E C R C
r M
k m ee 1 s 5 hiteland Rd E
W 2
S 4
4 g Whiteland 5
n 5
2 The Borden Group is generally not very productive and it is typically used only where
u d W
2
o a 27
5 28 W
e o
d
Y 7 29 overlying deposits do not contain an aquifer. Many wells, however, are able to produce
a
n 30 R
0
W 26 d
o 25 a
0
y
a c sufficient water for domestic purposes by relying on extra well-bore storage by drilling t R
4 27
5 i
o 29 28 n
2 r
d R
30 u 7
ty r
a
larger diameter and deeper wells. Typical yield of most domestic wells is less than 10
25 o 26 n
u S
y
o
d t
27 u C
a u
28 R
n H o
gpm with some dry holes reported. Yield may be greater in areas where thin outwash
o 29
g
30 u
y
C
R
t o
a
n deposits overlie the bedrock. Static water levels are typically between 10 and 35 feet
C
y r u t C
r k e o
n o
o ked Cre C below surface.
u C
o r
C e e 33 34 k The Borden Group is composed primarily of fine-grained materials that limit the Banta C 36 31 32 reek 41-03182-IR 34 35 movement of ground water. In areas where overlying clay materials are present, the 32 33 36 31 Borden Group Aquifer System is at low risk to contamination from the surface or near 34 35 C! T. 13 N.
32 33 d County Road 300 N Urmeyville surface. However, in some areas the bedrock is overlain by outwash materials that may R
31 T. 12 N.
e
n be capped by thin deposits of silt, lacustrine silt, or colluvium. These areas are at
a c
i moderate to high risk to contamination. r
Bargersville r u 3 H 4 T. 13 N. County Road 260 N 6 5 2 1 T. 12 N. 4 3 Devonian and Mississippian -- New Albany Shale 6 5 2 1 4 3 Road 200 N Aquifer System 6 5 County
N E nty Road 225
Cou E
0 The New Albany Shale Aquifer System in Johnson County is an extremely limited 0 k 0 e 0
e 5
4 ground-water resource. The outcrop/subcrop area for the New Albany Shale in Johnson
d
Cr d 10 d a 9
n R a
o
rs o 8 County is present along an approximate northwest to southeast trending band. This o e e 7
d R n n 11 12 R
e i
10 y
H l aquifer system consists mostly of brownish-black carbon-rich shale, greenish-gray shale,
t r 9 y
8 t n e
7 t n
u and minor amounts of dolomite and dolomitic quartz sandstone. n
11 12 u
9 10 o e
8 o
7 C C
C The New Albany Shale in Johnson County is up to 120 feet thick and generally increases County Road 100 N SR k 1 in thickness as it dips to the southwest beneath younger rock formations. Depth to ree 44 Franklin C bedrock is typically 25 to 130 feet. Completed well depths are commonly 55 to 140 feet County Road 575 W Providence 16 15 18 17 with wells typically penetrating less than 15 feet of bedrock. 14 13 tts 15 Sto 17 16 18 k ong 16 14 13 e This aquifer system is considered a poor ground-water resource and is generally 17 Pr 15 e 18 r SR 44 described as an aquitard. However, a few domestic wells have been completed in this C
th E system. Typical yields are 10 gpm or less with some dry holes reported. In some cases or N 0 County Road 750 W 0 well productivity is enhanced where outwash materials overlie the bedrock surface.
0 E 7 Division Rd Gr s e d Static water levels typically range from 10 to 40 feet below surface.
e W
e a 5 r n 22
s o 3
o 0 bu 21
W R o 0 r
1 20
g 19
1 R
0 y M
24 d Road 45
23 t
0 d R The permeability of shale materials is considered low. The New Albany Shale Aquifer
22 S n 6
a 21 oad 50 S
R ounty u reek o 20 C
C d
t 19 o System, therefore, has a low susceptibility to contamination introduced at or near the R a 23 24
s 22 C o o 21
20 y
19 t County
L R surface. However, in some areas the bedrock is overlain by outwash materials that may
u n Yo n
y g u t s o be capped by thin deposits of silt, lacustrine silt, or colluvium. These areas are at
n Cr
C u o County Road 100 S e moderate to high risk to contamination.
C e k O l 27 d 28 U 30 29 25 S 26 28 27 H Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer System 30 29 w 26 25 y 27 3 30 29 28 1 In Johnson County, the outcrop/subcrop area of the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates ¦¨§65 Bud Aquifer System is restricted to portions of the eastern third of the county. This system SR 44 eek h includes middle-Devonian age carbonates (limestone and dolomite) of the Muscatatuck Cr County Road 225 S c ay t 34 R i 33 Group and the underlying carbonates of Silurian age. Because carbonate units of Silurian County Road 250 S 32 D
W 31
36
5 34 35 and Devonian age are similar and cannot easily be distinguished on the basis of water
7 33 7 32
31 well records, they are considered as a single water-bearing system. 36 y d s eek 35
ott Cr 34 t T. 12 N. a t 32 33 S i o 31 m
R T. 11 N.
k g
y A The Muscatatuck Group in Johnson County is up to 125 feet thick and generally increases
t r n n o o u F in thickness as it dips to the southwest beneath younger rock formations. The underlying o Pr Road 300 S M
County E C Silurian carbonates are 125 to 175 feet thick and also thicken as they dip to the a T. 12 N. 0
u
0 W
h x
2 3 southwest. The combined thickness, therefore, is up to 300 feet with depth to bedrock
W
t County Road 225 W f 5 4
T. 11 N. W s e
t d o u 2 6 5
0 r
o 5
K a 1 r W
o 5 ranging from 80 to 250 feet below surface.
d
7 y
o 2 3
a Cou
S nty Road 350 S 4 5 3
R R
o 4 Amity
2 d k
d 5 d y
a e
R 6
a 1 6
t
e
3 2 o
o r
n y d
4 t Few water wells are completed in the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer System
5 R a 5 S u C
6 R 7 S ad 3 d 400 n o Roa y R nty
o t t ou oun o r C
y C a
u h
y k
t uc R t
C B in Johnson County. Prolific unconsolidated aquifer materials overlie the carbonate
o
n
n
E
y
u
C
u
t o
0 bedrock aquifer system and are used as the primary source of water. However, a few
o
n
0 C
u Y
C
8 o
ek wells penetrate 10 to 35 feet of the carbonate bedrock with completed well depths that o d C Trafalgar e u r a
C o range from 225 to 265 feet. n 9 10
r R
g 8
W 12 a
y 7 s
g t 0 10 11
u n 0
S u The Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer System is capable of meeting the needs of
8 9
8 C o d 12 7 SR 252 re e C
a 7 8 9 10 11 k domestic and some high-capacity users. Typical domestic yields are 10 gpm or greater o
R unty Road 500 S k Co with static water levels commonly reported from 60 to 90 feet below surface. One
y e t re
n C registered significant water withdrawal facility (one well) has a reported yield 80 gpm. u
o However, this well is located outside the outcrop area at a depth of 500 feet. Also, this
C W
well penetrates through the Mississippian Borden Group and Devonian New Albany
0 16 15 W s 0
W
e 17 n d
r 2 13 18 Shale Aquifer Systems. It is likely that there is some contribution from the overlying 0
a
B 0 0
d 14
0 d a 15 R y
3 bedrock aquifer systems.
5
r
R
S 16
o County Road 550
r d
d 17
R e h
a 13
a e
16 15 14 o 18 y 17 o B
18 v t
u uxf
R
e
R r
n n a
s Most of the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer System is overlain by thick clay y
2 u i
y in d
5 t t e M 2 o
n S N / n t deposits. Therefore, most of the aquifer system is considered at low risk to C S u ty Road 600 5 u Coun
3 ek o 1 o re C C contamination. However, in some areas the aquifer system is overlain by unconsolidated SR C se 31 oo ut County Road 650 S
W deposits composed primarily of sand and gravel outwash materials. In such areas, the G 21 22 5 20
2 North St 19 aquifer system is considered at moderate to high risk. d S 1 24
23 R u
d 22 ga d a 21 e r C R s 19 o 20 r r
24 u e
R e
e o Atterbury Fish 21 22 23 Gra k 19 20 ves v y h Rd i
t l r R
n o and e
u o v
o h i
c Wildlife Area
C S N R County Road 700 S in d e R ve
h Cree h 28 27 k c e
r 30 29
u A 25 l
27 26 I B nd e
28 n ian 29 Cr ek 25 30 to e 27 26 S g 29 28 d 0 S i 30 County Road 75 B
R
a
g Nineveh o Hospital Rd
e P Camp Atterbury Military Reservation SR 252 Camp Atterbury 34 32 33 36 31 Edinburgh Prince's 34 35 Driftwood 32 33 31 35 36 Lakes Fishing Area T. 11 N. 32 33 34 Military Reservation 31 P T. 10 N. r ince Creek R. 4 E. R. 5 E. T. 11 N. County Road 700 W R. 3 E. R. 4 E. R. 3 E.
Location Map EXPLANATION
C! Registered Significant Ground- water Withdraw Facility
County Road
State Roads & US Highways
Interstate
Stream
1010.5 Mile Lake & River
U.S. Military Reservation Camp Atterbury 1010.5 Kilometer
State Managed Property
Municipal Boundary
Map Use and Disclaimer Statement This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621) and Bedrock Aquifer Systems of Johnson County, Indiana We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were all from the Indiana Geological Map generated by Jennifer K. Mc Millan and Joseph L. Phillips from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale, except the Bedrock Geology of Indiana (polygon shapefile, by IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section 20020318) which was at a 1:500,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line Randal D. Maier September 2005 This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural shapefiles, 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Census Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Streams27 (line shapefile, 20000420) was from the “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map Center for Advanced Applications in GIS at Purdue University. Managed Areas 96 (polygon September 2005 is intended for use only at the published scale. shapefile, various dates) was from IDNR. Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Robert E. Carter Jr., Director Potentiometric Surface Map 17-B
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, INDIANA
R. 4 E. R. 5 E. R. 3 E. R. 4 E.
R. 2 E. R. 3 E.
E
0
0 3
27 d
a 30
o 25 Pleasant 29 L 28 C R e ree 26 at k 27 y h 26 25 28 t e 27 30 29 n r 29 28 u R Johnson County, Indiana is located in the central portion of the state and is situated within two 30 o un
C C r major drainage basins; the White and West Fork White River Basin to the west and the East Fork e d Lea e F R th k White River Basin to the east. erw la n oo i d C t l re k ek Greenwood n County Road 950 N a B The generalized potentiometric surface map (PSM) contour elevations represent lines of equal r 31 32 r F 33 34 a ney C 36 n elevation relative to the measured groundwater levels in wells. Static water level measurements o r 35 c H eek 33 34 h 35 32 Rocklane in individual wells used to construct the potentiometric surface map are indicative of the water 33 36 31 31 32 34 White and West T. 14 N. level at the time of well completion. Therefore, current site specific conditions may differ due to Fork White T. 13 N.
E
local or seasonal variations in measured static water levels. River Basin 5 White River 7 Smith Valley Rd 3
T. 14 N. d Coordinate locations of water well records were physically obtained in the field, determined 65 Allen Rd a T. 13 N. Frances ¨¦§ o 4 Rocklane Rd Smith R 6 5 3
through address geocoding, or reported on water well records. Elevation data were either y d Valley Curry Rd 5 2 1 t
6 3 n
R East Fork White
obtained from topographic maps or a digital elevation model (DEM). Elevation and location 1 4 u x
2 o
7 i 3
E n River Basin
4 C 3
6 i l
quality control/quality assurance procedures were utilized to refine or remove data where errors 5 0
l E
R 0
u
S 6
0
were readily apparent. M
5
d
a
2
ounty Road 800 N o
C d
R
a
tsinger Rd o
In Johnson County depth to bedrock varies ranging from less than 5 feet in the southwest up to 5 Cu y t
2 R 9 10
7 8 n y 7 u 250 feet to the northeast. There are approximately 493 located wells that are completed in Nor t th B o
luff n C
75 0 Demaree Rd u 12 o 11 bedrock. Wells are generally completed in shale and siltstone bedrock deposits of the 0 10 k 6 7 9 e Creek 8 C County Road 700 N 11 12 7 e Mississippian Borden Group or the Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale. However, 8 10 r 7 9 C much of the eastern part of Johnson County is lacking in data and/or covered by more prolific Stones 0 y 65 s T Crossing s unconsolidated deposits that limit the necessity to complete wells in bedrock. Therefore, r Stones Crossing Rd a av r
potentometric surface elevations contours have not been extended through these areas. is d G 17 t 18 16 15 C R reek 0 s
5 k a
7 e E 14 13 e
Potentiometric surface elevations range from a high of 850 feet mean sea level (msl) in the r 18 15 C
13 16 k
avis Rd 14
Tr 15 17 e
south-central region of the county near the basin divide, to a low of 650 feet msl in the northwest y 18 e 16 e
17 n r
and southeast parts of the county. Generalized groundwater flow direction for Johnson County is o County Road 600 N C
H
r towards major drainage relevant to the basin. Therefore, in the White and West Fork White a
County Road 600 N g u
River Basin, groundwater flow is west towards the White River, and to the east-southeast k
New S
e
k
e
20 21 e
19 l 22
towards Sugar Creek and the Big Blue River for the East Fork White River Basin. Bluff r
e Whiteland d t
e
23 24 t
R C
r i
Creek k
n
L y e
C s
w e
24 s r o 23
t s 20 22 a 19 C 21 n g 21 20 r 22 a 31 19 n
B g ¤£ G lu r u o o
f E f Y C S M r 5
eek R E
Whiteland Rd 2
1 5 5
4
4 2
d
W
2
a 28
5 e o
Whiteland d 29 7
a n 30 27
Kinder R
o 25 a
d d
c y a 26 27 R
i t R
28
o
r n y
30 t r
u R w 29
25 n
u o
o 26 y
27 u
t C
R H
o
30 29 n
y
C u
e o
k 28
C
o
m S Needham
d 34
EXPLANATION R
36 32 33
34 35 e 31 n
B 35 33 a a 36 32 c n 31 i t r a C 34 r lle T. 13 N. reek u Urmeyvi 33 ty Road 300 N T. 12 N. Line of equal elevation, in 32 H Coun 31 k e feet above mean sea level e 950 Bargersville r Old C Potentiometric Contour r 3
W 4 Bargersville a interval 10 feet T. 13 N. 5 0 5 5 ad 260 N 6 g
0 County Ro 2 7 8 u
T. 12 N. 7 7 3 2 1
5 4 S d 6 a 3 1 o 2 4 Stream R 5 S oad 200 N 6 R County R
y 1 t 4
n 4
u o County Road C
d 9 R
8 10
e 7
n
i l
r 11 12
State Road & US Highway e 10 11 12 8 t 9
7 n e
9 C 7 8 10 Hopewell ek County Road 100 N Interstate re C Providence Franklin W 18 17 15 0 16
5 14 13
7 15 s 13 18 16 Basin Boundary d 17 tt 17 a to 14 5 SR 44 o S 15 2 R 16 8 18 g
y n E t o 725 r n
P 0 u
th 0
o r
o 7
C N Division Rd
d a
Municipal Boundary W G o r
0 e 22
e R
n 0 s
b y
1 0
u t
5 rg n
d 7 23 24 R u
a d 19 o o 21 20 21
0 20 C
19 R 5 0 23 24 22
3 O 8 y
t l
Camp Atterbury Military 22 1 d n 21 U
19 u S
20 R Reservation k o
e Y H S e C w r o y C u st S 31 o County Road 100 n 65
g ¨¦§ L Mount s
27 W C Pleasant 28 State Managed Property 0 26 r 0 27 25 e 30 29
6 28
e 29 k
d 25 30 a o 27 26 R 28
30 29
y t 7 n Bud
u 0
o 0
Lake & River C SR 44
W ad 225 S 5 County Ro 7 34 5 6 2 2
33
W
C d 35 32
5 r 34 tts eek a 33 36 31 7 to S o 32 M
7 36 31
35 R a
d 34 32 g u T. 12 N.
No Aquifer Material 33 y a
t x
n o n f T. 11 N. 31 o e u
or Limited Data R r r
o r
y y t P C
n h R
u t County Road 300 S d
o u
C o
T. 12 N. S W
W k 3
e
T. 11 N. 0 e
5 r 1 4 5 7 3 2
3 C 5
4 0 0 Anita 6
d 4 7 d Amity a 5
a 1 6 o o
R t
R r
ha
k y y 3 2 k S t c oad 400 4 t u County R 5 e
6 n B
n e u
u r o o k
C C
C e 5 e 72 s r e C r n Trafalgar a r g a Su B 9 10 SR 252 8 12 7
d 11
R 10 7 8 9 12 h 9 10 11 5 7 8 e 00 S v 2 County Road 5
Samana e 7
n
i
N
W
0 13 18 16 2 0 14 17 15
5 2 2
R d S a County Road 550 S 5 o 15 3 R 17 1 16 R y 18 17 S 16 15 13 t 18 14 n
® 5 u Pisgah
2 o 7 C Lake
21 20 22 0 5 6 7 22 7 21 5
24 19 20 19 5 24 23 23 19 20 8 2 21 22 00 8 Atterbury Fish r and e v i
d Wildlife Area 31 R R e County Road 700 S ¤£
h u l 27 c 28 r 30 29 B
I A
n 25 g d i
e 26
ia 27 n n C 0 S B r County Road 75 o
ee Nineveh t k 25 S 1 0.5 0 1 Mile 27 26 30 29 28 SR 252 30 29 28
d
R Earlham a ry 6 g tterbu 00 Camp A 5 7 Lake o 0 e y Reservation P Militar 33 34 W
Prince's 31 32
0 36 Edinburgh
0 35 Lakes 34 7
Driftwood 1 0.5 0 1 Kilometer 32 Lamb d 031 33 a 34 35 36 85 Fishing Area Lake o T. 11 N. R
T. 10 N.
y 32 33 7 31 t
0 n
0 u o C R. 4 E. R. 5 E. T. 11 N. T. 10 N. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. R. 2 E. R. 3 E.
Location Map Hillshade Map of Johnson County, Indiana
Vertical Exaggeration = 10x
Map Use and Disclaimer Statement This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), and County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were all from the Indiana Geological Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line shapefiles, Potentiometric Surface Map of the We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 Bedrock Aquifers of Johnson County, Indiana from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Census Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Hydrography, Streams (NHD) Map generated by Scott H. Dean and Randal D. Maier, (line shapefile, 20081218), Rivers (NHD) (polygon shapefile, 20081218), Lakes (NHD) (polygon shapefile, 20081218) was from the by IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Managed Lands IDNR IN Randal D. Maier Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. (polygon shapefile, 20100920) was from IDNR and based on a 1:24,000 scale. County Hillshade image was from the U.S. Geological Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed Survey National Elevation Dataset (raster image, 20100324). No Aquifer Material and Limited Data (jonbednocov polygon shapefile, “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map Maier, 2012). Potentiometric Surface Map of the Bedrock Aquifers of Johnson County, Indiana (line shapefiles, Maier, 2012) was is intended for use only at the published scale. based on a 1:24,000 scale. September 2012
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Kyle J. Hupfer, Director Aquifer Systems Map 18-A
UNCONSOLIDATED AQUIFER SYSTEMS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Six unconsolidated aquifer systems have been mapped in Johnson County: the Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum; the New Castle Till; the New Castle Till R. 4 E. R. 5 E. Subsystem; the New Castle Complex; the White River and Tributaries Outwash; and the R. 3 E. R. 4 E. White River and Tributaries Outwash Subsystem. Boundaries of these aquifer systems
R. 2 E. R. 3 E. E Fl are commonly gradational, and individual aquifers may extend across aquifer system 0 at
0 boundaries.
3
d 27 a Br o 25 30 28 an Pleasa R 29 c The thickness of unconsolidated sediments in Johnson County is quite variable. Pre- nt C L h re 27 26 y e t a 30 29 28 ek t Wisconsin glacial sediments have completely covered the entire county followed by 26 25 n h 41-03437-PS 27 u er 29 28 o R Wisconsin glacial sediments that covered nearly all but the extreme southwestern area. C! C un C Sediments that overlie bedrock range from 5 feet, in areas where only residuum or thin 30 r e
d e drift is present, to as much as 250 feet. Le k R ath 41-00565-PS C! erwo n od i Creek l N Greenwood 41-01098-IR k County Road 950 34 Regional estimates of aquifer susceptibility to contamination from the surface can differ 41-04148-PS C! n 32 C! 31 a
35 r 33 considerably from local reality. Variations within geologic environments can cause F oney C 33 34 36 H re 31 32 variation in susceptibility to surface contamination. In addition, man-made structures ek C! 35 41-02307-PS 36 Rocklane 31 32 T. 14 N. such as poorly constructed water wells, unplugged or improperly abandoned wells, and 33 34 T. 13 N. open excavations, can provide contaminant pathways that bypass the naturally protective
E r clays. White ve 5 R i Smith Valley Rd 7 3 3 41-03308-IR C! 4 T. 14 N. Frances Allen Rd d 65 a 6 5 Rocklane Rd T. 13 N. Smith ¨¦§ o
1 R
d 3 2 Valley y
t R Curry Rd 5 4 6 Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum Aquifer System
n x
u
i 2
o n 1
7 i 4 3
l E
6 T C
5 l
3 u 0 u rk R ey 0
M 6
S P E
en C d
reek County Road 800 N 0 The Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum Aquifer System is mapped along portions a
5
o 2
9 10 of the western half of Johnson County, along a portion of Sugar Creek northwest of R
d C 8
u d tsinger R
d a 7
y R
t
10 o Edinburgh and in a small area of Edinburgh. The systems are mapped together because k
12 n
R
e u C
ff r e 9 o lu e y 11 they are similar in composition and aquifer characteristics. It is the most limited ground
B r ek 8 t
Demaree Rd C
n
11 C 7 h u County Road 700 N water resource of the unconsolidated aquifer systems in Johnson County. t 10 y or 9 o
N 41-03301-IR 12 e C n H C! o 7 8 Stones H o Unconsolidated deposits of this aquifer system consist mostly of till with thin layers of n e Crossing stratified drift and, in some areas along the southwestern portion of the county, thin, Tr Stones Crossing Rd y a C 15 v 17 16 eroded bedrock residuum. Thickness of these sediments typically range from less than 5 is r 18 C e feet (where only residuum is present) to 50 feet. However, there are a few isolated areas reek e 14 13 k 17 k where glacial deposits have filled small bedrock valleys and the thickness of sediments is 13 18 16 e 15
14 e k r e greater.
Travis Rd C e 16 15 r
k y 18 e
17 s C
e s County Roa Because this aquifer system is generally thin and not very productive, most drillers prefer d 575 N r r a
r a
C 41-01370-IN g County Road 600 N G to complete wells in the underlying bedrock aquifer. However, many large diameter
y u ounty Road 550 N s New t C
s C! S bucket or cable tool type wells are successful in meeting the needs of domestic users.
s a 21
20 e
a l 22
d Whiteland E 19
r Bluff t Total well depths are commonly 45 to 50 feet. Aquifer materials consist of thin sand and
d 24
R 23 t
21 i
G
R 22
n
k
Creek L gravel deposits that are typically less than 5 feet in thickness. Well capacities are less
w e w o e o 24
t 23 19 20 r than 5 gallons per minute (gpm) with static water levels commonly 8 to 30 feet below
R 20 n
21
a
k C y 31
19 e g B e ¤£ surface.
r e k
lu o 22 r o
S C! E f R
f M C m C 5
r k 1 E 2 ee S
4 Whiteland Rd 41-04245-PS Because of the low permeability of the surface materials, this aquifer system is not very 5
4 Whiteland 5
s
2 W
g d
2 a
n 27 susceptible to contamination from surface sources. 5 W 28
e o
d
u 7 29
a
0 n R
o
W
d o
Kinder 0 25 a
y a 30
4 Y c
t R 5 27 26
i o
28
n 2
d 29 r
y
R
u
7 a
30 t r
S
25 o o
n u y
d u
t u
27 C New Castle Till Aquifer System a
R 26 H
n g
o
o y 30 u
Crooked Creek a
C
t
R o
r
29 n C
y 28
u
t C
o
n C u r
o e
C e The New Castle Till Aquifer System in Johnson County is mapped mostly in the central 33 Needham k 31 32 and north-central portion of the county. Unconsolidated deposits range from 40 feet 34 anta 36 B Cre 35 (where bedrock is near the surface) to 250 feet (where thick glacial deposits have filled ek 33 34 31 32 35 36 bedrock valleys). Potential aquifer materials include outwash sands and/or gravels that 34 d T. 13 N.
R Urmeyville typically range from 10 to 15 feet thick and are generally overlain by 65 to 135 feet of
e County Road 300 N T. 12 N. 32 33
31 n clay.
a
c i
Bargersville r r Old u The New Castle Till Aquifer System is capable of meeting the needs of domestic and
H 3 Bargersville 4 T. 13 N. County Road 260 N 6 5 some high-capacity users. Well depths generally range from 75 to 150 feet below T. 12 N. 3 2 1 4 3 surface. Domestic well capacities are typically 10 to 15 gpm. There are four registered 6 5 2 1 significant water withdrawal facilities (6 wells) that report well capacities ranging from 5 4 County Road 200 N
6 County Road 225 N 41-03826-IR 41-04027-PS 70 gpm to 250 gpm. Static water levels range from 10 to 50 feet below surface with
E
C! E C! some reports of flowing wells.
0
0
0 0
5
4
d
d
d a
k R 9 The New Castle Till Aquifer System is generally not very susceptible to surface a
ee o 8 o
r e 11 7 10
R C n
R contamination because its intratill sand and gravel units are overlain by thick till deposits. W
n i 12
y o l 9
s t
y r r 5
e t n
8 e 10
d 7 t
7 n
n u
e 5
n u 11 12 41-00559-PS
H 10 o
e o d
7 C
a C 9 C! C 8 o R Hopewell New Castle Till Aquifer Subsystem y t
n County Road 100 N u ek o re 41-00219-IR C C SR 15
W Providence Franklin C! 18 16 14 0 4 17 The New Castle Till Aquifer Subsystem is mapped mostly in the central portion of 5 14 13 7
s tt 16 15 d to 17 Johnson County and southeast to the county boundary. The characteristics of the New a S 18
o k rong 15 14 13 e Castle Till Aquifer Subsystem are similar to that of the New Castle Till Aquifer System. R 18 17 P e
16 r 44 y SR t C However, thickness of potential aquifer materials and potential yield is significantly less.
n E u
th
o r Typical well depths range from 50 feet to 90 feet. Potential outwash aquifer materials o 0 C
N 0
7 include thin, intratill sand and gravel deposits that range from 1 to 8 feet in thickness. Division Rd 21
s 20 d
W G a
5 e r 22 The outwash aquifer deposits are capped by till generally 45 to 80 feet thick. Also, a few
r e o 3
o 0 en
R W
0 s
1 o 41-02403-PS
b
1 u S abandoned water wells at Camp Atterbury Military Reservation, along with some seismic
0 0 y M rg Road 5 23 ounty t
0 C R d R 19
C! 24 n a 6 d
S 21 data, indicate thickness of unconsolidated materials up to 130 feet.
u
o 20 d
19 22 o R
a 23 24
C
19 o
21 22 y
t
R
n oun The New Castle Till Aquifer Subsystem is capable of meeting the needs of some
y Y 20 u g t s
k o e n C
C domestic users. However, in some cases it is necessary for drillers to continue below the e u r r C o 100 S e C County Road st e aquifer bearing zone into underlying clay deposits. This increases well capacity by o k L O Mount l allowing for extra borehole storage. Typical well yields range from 4 to 10 gpm. Static d 28 27 Pleasant U S 29 water levels are generally 10 to 35 feet below land surface. Abandoned test wells located 26 28 25 H 30 at Atterbury Military Reserve report well yields of 15 to 40 gpm with static water levels 29 27 w 25 30 y 29 26 that range from 20 to 70 feet below land surface. However, significant drawdown is 28 27 3 30 1 reported on some well records indicating limited yield in isolated areas. 65 Bud reek ¨¦§ The New Castle Till Aquifer Subsystem is generally not very susceptible to surface y C SR 44 a h W ad 225 S County Ro c contamination because its intratill sand and gravel units are overlain by thick till deposits. R t 34 5 32 i 2 ad 250 S 31
W Ro D
2 County 33
5 ts C d 34 35
a 7 t Sto ree 33 36 y
k o 7 32 t 36 31 i R
d 35
a 31 g m
y T. 12 N. New Castle Complex Aquifer System o
32 t n 33 A n
R 34
k o T. 11 N.
r u
r y o
t o P C
n F u
o S h ounty Road 300 M
C E C t The New Castle Complex Aquifer System is mapped in portions of the eastern half of s a ot u 0
o u 0 T. 12 N. K o W
x 4 W
2 3
S 5 f Johnson County. The system is commonly mapped adjacent to outwash aquifer systems.
T. 11 N. W
e
0 d 2 5
r
5 a 5 County Road 350 S
r d
7 The New Castle Complex Aquifer System is characterized by unconsolidated deposits o
3 2 y
a
4
W R Amity
1 R
d o
Anita 4 a d k 5 3 that are quite variable in materials and thickness. Sand and gravel aquifer deposits vary d
5 y
R e 6 a
o t 2 6
2 e
o
n y 6
3 R r t
4 1
5 u from thin to massive and are typically overlain by a thick till. However, the system also 6 R 5 S C
n 7 S d 3 400 y ad ad nty Ro o ounty Ro
t u t C a u Co r
y ha C
t k
n o c
o Bu exhibits multiple layers of outwash and till of variable thickness above the aquifer
n
u
R C
u
o o
y resource. Total thickness of unconsolidated deposits can be as much as 250 feet.
C 41-04243-IR
t C n k C! u e o re
C Trafalgar C 10 Typical well depths range from 60 to 125 feet. Outwash aquifer materials range from 1 r a 9 g to 105 feet in thickness but are typically 5 to 30 feet thick. The aquifer deposits can be SR 252 12 8 u 11 7 S C! overlain by till up to 215 feet thick. However, the till cap is generally 35 to 90 feet. In
d 10 9 S
R 41-04362-IR 8 9 ek 12 7 8 u some areas the outwash aquifer materials are separated from upper sand and gravel e 10 11 h g r e a County Road 500 S C v r deposits (not typically used as a resource) by till that commonly ranges from 10 to 40 feet
e C
7 n
i r thick. The upper sands and gravels are typically 2 to 20 feet thick. Samana e C! N e k 41-03578-IR
es W arn
B 0 16 The New Castle Complex is capable of meeting the needs of domestic and some high- W
0 18
14 17
2 15 13 0
15 capacity users. Typical domestic yields range from 15 to 20 gpm. Three registered
0 d
W
a
3
0 o ty Road 550 S 16 significant water withdrawal facilities (5 wells) report pumping capacities that range from d Coun
0 41-04363-IR R a 13
5
o 18 17 2 y 70 gpm to 700 gpm. Typical static water levels range from 15 to 40 feet below surface. d 15 17 18 5 t C! 14 R
2 a
n B
o u
R y 16 u r
S t n
R o s
n i d
C e u y ad 600 S S The New Castle Complex Aquifer System is not very susceptible to contamination where 5 t ounty Ro 3 o C t 1 n ek C R u re thick clay materials overlie. However, in some areas where outwash is present at or near
S o C 31 oad 650 S C ¤£ 21 County R the surface and clay deposits are thin, the system is at moderate to high risk. e s 24 22 o 23 41-00375-IN o 22 C! G 21 19 20 24 19 20 21 22 23 G Atterbury Fish
19 20 raves Rd White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer System r
and e v
Wildlife Area i R
N d d in R
County Road 700 S e R
v e
e
h s
h The White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer System in Johnson County is mapped
u e 27
C c 28 r o
eek r
29 u h
30 l in the northwest corner along the White River and along most of the eastern third of the A l 25
27 26 o I e B
n o d 30 29 28 n county along Hurricane Creek, Sugar Creek and the Big Blue River. This system
i h
an o c
C 25 Nineveh t S r 26 S contains large volumes of outwash and alluvial deposits that filled the river valleys of the eek 27 d g 30 unty Road 750 S 41-00209-PS i SR 252 R Co B 28 White River and its major tributaries. As the glaciers melted, the quantity of sediment a C! 29 g 41-02465-PS o was too large for the streams to transport. As a result, the increased sediment load was
e
P C! 33 34 stored in the valley as vertical and lateral accretionary deposits. As long as the retreating Camp Atterbury glaciers continued to provide sediment in quantities too large for the streams to transport, Military Reservation 32 W
Prince's C! the main valley continued to be filled. These deposits formed the most prolific aquifer 0 35 36 31 Edinburgh 0 34 Driftwood 41-00395-MI
7 Lakes system in the county. 32 31 d 34 36 31 33 a 35 Fishing Area T. 11 N. o 32 33
R T. 10 N. P Total thickness of unconsolidated deposits can be as much as 165 feet with up to 110 feet
y r t ince Creek n of continuous sand and gravel. In some areas, however, stringers of silt, clay-sand or u o clay-gravel mixtures, generally 5 to 30 feet thick, disrupt the continuity of the sands and C R. 4 E. R. 5 E. T. 11 N. gravels. Well depths are typically 45 to 85 feet. Aquifer materials are commonly 10 to T. 10 N. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. 45 feet thick and may be capped by 5 to 25 feet of clay or silt. R. 2 E. R. 3 E. This system has the greatest potential of any aquifer system in Johnson County and can meet the needs of domestic and high-capacity users. Domestic well yields commonly range from 10 to 25 gpm. There are fourteen registered significant water withdrawal facilities (45 wells) in this system. Reported well capacities are up to 2700 gpm but are typically 500 to 1500 gpm. Static water levels range from 10 to 25 feet below surface with some reports of flowing wells.
In areas that lack overlying clays, this aquifer system is highly susceptible to Location Map EXPLANATION contamination from surface sources. Where the aquifer system is overlain by clay or silt deposits, the aquifer is moderately susceptible to surface contamination.
C! Registered Significant Ground- Municipal Boundary water Withdraw Facility White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Subsystem County Road U.S. Military Reservation Camp Atterbury In Johnson County the White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Subsystem is ® mapped in the southwest corner along Indian Creek and to the east of Franklin from the State Roads & US Highways State Managed Property confluence of Hurricane Creek and Youngs Creek continuing south to the Bartholomew County line.
Interstate There are few wells available in the White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Lake & River Subsystem. Well depths typically range from 35 to 60 feet below surface. Sand and gravel aquifer deposits are generally 10 to 35 feet thick. The sands and gravels may also Stream be capped by a silt or clay 5 to 20 feet thick. In a few isolated areas bedrock is shallow; some drillers bypass the unconsolidated sediments and continue to bedrock allowing for extra borehole storage. However, typical penetration of the bedrock is less than 10 feet and it is likely that the overlying sands and gravels contribute significantly to the well yield.
This aquifer system has the potential to meet the needs of domestic and some high- capacity users. Domestic well yields are typically from 10 to 25 gpm with static water levels 5 to 20 feet below surface. There is one registered significant water withdrawal 1 0.5 0 1 Mile facility (3 wells) in the outwash subsystem in Johnson County with reported capacities that range from 100 gpm to 450 gpm.
Areas within this aquifer system that have overlying clay and silt deposits are moderately susceptible to surface contamination; whereas, areas that lack overlying clay and silt 1 0.5 0 1 Kilometer deposits are highly susceptible to contamination.
This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana Map Use and Disclaimer Statement (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621) and County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were from the Indiana Geological Unconsolidated Aquifer Systems of Johnson County, Indiana We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line Map generated by Jennifer K. Mc Millan and Joseph L. Phillips from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section shapefiles, 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 by September 2005 This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Randal D. Maier Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. Census Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Streams27 (line shapefile, 20000420) was from Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed the Center for Advanced Applications in GIS at Purdue University. Managed Areas 96 (polygon “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map is intended for use only at the published scale. shapefile, various dates) was from IDNR. Unconsolidated Aquifer Systems coverage (Maier, September 2005 2005, Modified 2010) was based on a 1:24,000 scale. Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Robert E. Carter Jr., Director Potentiometric Surface Map 17-A
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE UNCONSOLIDATED AQUIFERS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, INDIANA
R. 4 E. R. 5 E. R. 3 E. R. 4 E.
R. 2 E. R. 3 E.
E
0
0 3
27 d
a 30 Pleasant o 25 29 L 28 C 26 R e 29 ree at k 27 y h 26 25 28 t e 27 30 n r Johnson County, Indiana is located in the central portion of the state and is situated within two 29 28 u R
30 o un 0
C C major drainage basins; the White and West Fork White River Basin to the west and the East Fork 3 F r l
7 e a d Lea e t White River Basin to the east. R th k erw n oo i d C B l re r k e 90 k a
7 n
The generalized potentiometric surface map (PSM) contour elevations represent lines of equal Greenwood County Road 950 N n a 0
r 32 c
6 31
F 33 h elevation relative to the measured groundwater levels in wells. Static water level measurements 0 ney 6 36 34 4 o Cr 35 6 H eek 32 33 34 in individual wells used to construct the potentiometric surface map are indicative of the water 35 Rocklane 33 36 31 level at the time of well completion. Therefore, current site specific conditions may differ due to 31 32 34 T. 14 N. 0 T. 13 N. 0 1 7 0
7 E
local or seasonal variations in measured static water levels. 0 6 8 720 9 0 5 6 4 W 7 hite River 6 7
3
Coordinate locations of water well records were physically obtained in the field, determined T. 14 N. d 65 Allen Rd a T. 13 N. Smith Frances ¨¦§ o 4 Rocklane Rd R 6 through address geocoding, or reported on water well records. Elevation data were either 5 3
y
d 2 Valley Curry Rd 5 1 t
6 3 n R
obtained from topographic maps or a digital elevation model (DEM). Elevation and location 4
1 u x
2 o
i 3 0
E n
4 8 C quality control/quality assurance procedures were utilized to refine or remove data where errors White and West
6 i 7
0 l 5 0
l 5
E
0
7 u Fork White
7 6 0 were readily apparent. 0 3
M 5
4 d a
6 R River Basin 2
S County Road 800 N o
d
R a
In Johnson County well depths 100 feet or less were a priority in mapping the potentiometric 0 o y 9
6 t
7 R 8 10
0 n
surface. However, portions of western and southern Johnson County are lacking in data and/or y u 0 East Fork White 7 Nor t th o B 7
luff n C are covered by deposits that have limited to non-existent aquifer potential. Therefore, Demaree Rd River Basin u 11 12 10 k o 9 0 C e reek 8 C 7 County Road 700 N potentometric surface elevations contours have not been extended through these areas. There are 11 12 7 e 7 8 10 0 r 7 9 0 8 C approximately 1,747 unconsolidated water well records in the county within the priority depth Stones y 650 s range with approximately 925 (53%) of these wells located. T Crossing s r Stones Crossing Rd a av r
is d G 17 t 18 16 15 Potentiometric surface elevations range from a high of 800 feet mean sea level (msl) in the east- C R reek s
k a
e E 14 13
central and north-central region of the county near the basin divide, to lows of 640 feet msl in the e
r 18 15
C 13 k
d 14 16
northwest and 650 feet msl in the southeast part of the county. Generalized groundwater flow Travis R 15 17 e y 18 e 16 e
17 n r
direction for Johnson County is towards major drainage relevant to the basin. Therefore, in the o County Road 600 N
C
H
White and West Fork White River Basin, groundwater flow is west towards the White River, and r a
County Road 600 N 0 g to the east-southeast towards Sugar Creek and the Big Blue River for the East Fork White River 8 u
k 7
New S
e
k
e
20 21 e
Basin. 19 l 22
Bluff r
e Whiteland d t
e
23 24 t
R C
r i
Creek 21 k
n
L y 22 e
C s
w 19 e
24 s r o 23
t s 20
22 a 21 n g C 20 r a 31 19 n
B g ¤£ G lu r u f o o
f Y E
M Cr S
eek R E 5
Whiteland Rd 2
14 5
5 2
4
W
2
d
W 28 a
5 e
Whiteland d 29
o
7 a 27 0 n 0 30
Kinder
o 0 a
5 26 25 R
d d
c
4 a
27 7 R i
y R
28
t
o r
d
y n
t r
a R
w 30 29
25 u n
o u
o 26
y o
27 u
t R
R H
o
C 29 n
30 y
y
C u
t
e
o n
k 28
u
C
o
o
m
C S
Needham
0
d
8 34 R
EXPLANATION 7 36 33
34 35 e 31 32 n
B 35 33 a a 36 32 c n 31 i t 0 r a 34 r T. 13 N. C 9 lle reek u Urmeyvi 33 7 ty Road 300 N T. 12 N. H Coun 32 0 Line of equal elevation, in 31 k 7 e 7 e feet above mean sea level Bargersville r 950 Old C Potentiometric Contour
r 3 W T. 13 N. Bargersville 5 a
interval 10 feet 5 County Road 260 N 6 4 g 2
u
T. 12 N. 7 3 2 1
5 4 S
d a 6 1 o 3 2 4 R 5 S oad 200 N Stream 6 R County R y 1 t 4
n 4
u
o C County Road
d 9 R W
8 10
e
5 7 n
7
i l 5
r 12 11
e 10 d 7 t 9
State Road & US Highway a 11 12 8 n
o e
R C
9 7 8 10 y t
n Hopewell u ek County Road 100 N o re Interstate C C Providence Franklin W 18 17 15 0 16
5 14 13
7 0 15 s 13 18 16 72 SR 44 d 17 tt 17 Basin Boundary a to 14 o S 15 R 16 18 g
y n E t o r n
P 0 u
th 0
o r
o 7
C N Division Rd d
G a o
Municipal Boundary 5 0 re 22 3 5 e R 7 n
1 s
b y
u t rg 24 n R 23 R
d u S 19 20 21 20 21 o
19 C 23 24 22 21 22 Camp Atterbury Military 19 20 800 O k ld Reservation ee 0 Y U r 7 o S 7 C u H
0 st w n o 1 y 65 L 7 g 3 ¨¦§ Mount 1 s
27 W C Pleasant 28 0 26 r
0 29 State Managed Property 27 25 e 30
6 28
e 30 29 740 k
d 25 a o 27 26 R 28
30 29 y t 73
n 0 u
o Bud Lake & River C SR 44 W ad 225 S County Ro 34 5 2 2
33
W
C d 35 32
5 34 tts reek a 33 36 31 7 to S o 32 M
7 36 31
35 R a
d 34 g u
33 y T. 12 N. a
32 t x
No Aquifer Material 31 n o n f T. 11 N. o e u R r r or Limited Data o r y y
t P C
n h R
u t County Road 300 S d o u
C o S
T. 12 N. W
W k
3
5 e 0
T. 11 N. 7 re 1 4
5 4
3 2
3 C 5
d Anita 6 6 a d 4 Amity
a 7 o 1 6 5
o 0 R 0 69
R rt
y a
t h k 2y k S 3 t 00 4 n uc County Road 4 5 e
6 n
u B
e
u o
r o C k C C e e s r e C r n Trafalgar a r g a u 7 SR 252 S 8 B 9 10 0 8 12 7
d 11
R 10 7 8 9 9 10 11 12 h 7 8 e 00 S v County Road 5
Samana e n i 7 0 8 N 6 700 0 6
0
13 8
W
6
0 18 16 2 0 14 17 15
5 2 2
R d S a County Road 550 S 5 o 15 ® 3 R 17 1 16 R y 18 17 S 16 15 13 t 18 14 n
u Pisgah o C Lake
21 20 22 22 21 24 19 20 24 19 23 23 660 19 20 21 22 Atterbury Fish r and e v i
d Wildlife Area 31 R R e County Road 700 S ¤£
h u l 27 c 28 r 30 29 B I A n 25 g d i
e 26
ia 27 n n C 0 S B r County Road 75 o ee Nineveh t
1 0.5 0 1 Mile k 25 S 27 26 30 29 28 SR 252 30 29 28
d 0 65 R Earlham a ry g Camp Atterbu
Lake o 6 e y Reservation 6 P Militar 34 33 0 W Prince's 31 32 6 0 36 Edinburgh
6
0 35 1 0.5 0 1 Kilometer Lakes 34
7 0
Driftwood 32 Lamb d 31 33 a 34 35 36 Fishing Area Lake o T. 11 N. R
T. 10 N.
y 32 33 31 t n u o C R. 4 E. R. 5 E. T. 11 N. T. 10 N. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. R. 2 E. R. 3 E.
Location Map Hillshade Map of Johnson County, Indiana
Vertical Exaggeration = 10x
Map Use and Disclaimer Statement This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), and County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were all from the Indiana Geological Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line shapefiles, Potentiometric Surface Map of the We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 Unconsolidated Aquifers of Johnson County, Indiana from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Census Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Hydrography, Streams (NHD) Map generated by Scott H. Dean and Randal D. Maier, (line shapefile, 20081218), Rivers (NHD) (polygon shapefile, 20081218), Lakes (NHD) (polygon shapefile, 20081218) was from the by IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Managed Lands IDNR IN Randal D. Maier Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. (polygon shapefile, 20100920) was from IDNR and based on a 1:24,000 scale. County Hillshade image was from the U.S. Geological Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed Survey National Elevation Dataset (raster image, 20100324). No Aquifer Material and Limited Data (jonuncnocov_83 polygon “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map shapefile) coverage is based on The Unconsolidated Aquifer Systems of Johnson County, Indiana (polygon shapefile, Maier, 2005), is intended for use only at the published scale. Potentiometric Surface Map of the Unconsolidated Aquifers of Johnson County, Indiana (line shapefiles, Maier, 2012) was based on September 2012 a 1:24,000 scale.