DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisheries Around Tasman Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisheries Around Tasman Peninsula 117 FISHERIES AROUND TASMAN PENINSULA by A.I. Harrison Department of Sea Fisheries, Ta smania The waters around the Tasman Peninsula have sustained commercial fishing for more than 150 years. Prior to 1950 the area was a major supplier of rock lobster (crayfish), and scale fish for the Hobart market. Since 1965 abalone diving has become a most important commercial fishery. Recently the peninsula's protected bays have become prize sites for aquaculture. Initially this form of marine farming was directed at shellfish, particularly oysters and mussels. Cage culture of rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon recently has become important. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, commercial fisheries, recreational fisheries, aquaculture. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS HISTORY ENOUGH? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE PRESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA . Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 117-119. INTRODUCTION CRAYFISHING The waters surrounding Tasman Peninsula have been In the light of recent high-profile campaigns of a rich source of seafood for more than 150 years. conservation groups it is not surprising that concern Like much of the rest of Australia it is the invertebrate for protection of our natural resources is widely fisheries which are of overriding importance. The assumed to be a modem phenomenon. In fact the spiny rock lobster (crayfish), crabs, oysters, scallops, health of fisheries today is due to conservation mussels and abalone have all been harvested from measures instituted in the past, in some cases over a this area. The ports of Nubeena and Dunalley have century ago; traditionally provided the shore base for local The success of these measures can be gauged fishermen; however, in recent years larger and faster by a record harvestof crayfishin the 1984-85seaSo n vessels have reduced their importance relative to despite almost two centuries of exploitation. The Hobart. framework of today's conservation measures was set The availability of light-weight, trailerised, down in the Crayfish Protection Act of 1885. This outboard-powered small boats - generally 3-7 m act followed a Royal Commission of 1882 which long - has stimulated a substantial expansion in reviewed the industry and the resources on which it recreational fishing around Tasman Peninsula. was based and recommended a minimum size of Eaglehawk Neck, Fortescue Bay, Port Arthur and 10 inches overall. Whilst the current minimum size Murdunna, as well as the traditional ports, are now is slightly different, the survival of the industry is the popular centres for the amateur crayfisherman due almost entirely to this law introduced 101 years and diver. The pressure of this recreational fishing ago. has forced many commercial fishermen from the By 1881 crayfishing in this area was already inshore grounds. well developed. In the report to the Tasmanian The area now produces around 150 tonnes of Parliament of the 1882 Royal Commission, entitled crayfish and 300 tonnes of abalone. Small catches of Ta smanian Fisheries, Robert Smith a local fisherman crab, octopus, scallops and squid are also made but told the Commission, "We get crayfishanywhere but the crayfishermen and abalone diver now dominate they are not so plentiful as formerly." Francis Rush the industry. Commercial fishermen now receive more reported, "The average weight of a full grown male than $5 million a year for their catches from the is 4 lbs, big fish weigh 7 lbs. The run is now smaller waters surrounding the peninsula. than it used to be; they are much scarcer. This arises from over fishing and catching the female fish." Fishing was by hoop nets also called rings. Whilst 118 kJ. Harrison , pots were used in the Bass Strait, they were considered DlSClJSSION destructive by southern fishemJen and nol legalised here un til after anorher in 192t In answer to the question "Is historyenoue hT', history Wllliam Henry deOlcribed himself as a is certainly enough to \-varrant a "ii�jt to TaS1Dan "deep sea tishelTnan" and described his vessel as "an Peninsula, and is enough to the preservation ordinary openwell boat (of average size, feet and display of the historical However, if i" 6 inches long, 7 fect inch beam and 2 feet inches clearly not enough in terms of the deep). The ooab are safi,;, and 10 mun c()ntributl0n the area can rnakc �he econOD1Y of drowned, due to bad handling. I don't think Tasmania. There are many example, here of the it would be of service to have the boats decked " difficultie, which be encountered by regions The main for crayfish were from which depend 011 single industries. This cannot Bay to Island and Martin fished down expect 10 be from the volatile to fathoms. The male crayfish weighed economic which is likely alter viability 4 1bs (about 2 with big over 3 kg. An average-- of all industries including tourism. The present sized fish returned about two cents to the fishennan economy of Tasmania is straining to maintain the and it was common for the fish to he llsed as bait to past standard of and Hfe -style of the Tasmanian catch or real trumpeter. population. Assuming a desire in the season the Hv'=,,,�e-, community to at least the quality of life we catch was 730 gm but clllTently enjoy. then we must ellsure that our Throughout the past 100 years small numbers economic potential is utilised 10 the full. To close off crabs have also b,�en caught along with the industries in this region would be to a needed contribution to the weB-being all Taslnanians. In telms of fisheries, the future of the region involves three industries - traditional commercial OTHER FISHING All to rigorous Port Arthur and Marion Bay have always supponed they do nor adversely affectother activities intermittent for however, the most on land. important area this has been Norfolk Potting for crayfish and diving for abalone will Bay. A small sdtlement of scallops in Norfolk Bay continue to be the most important commercial around 1948 was fished in 1950. It may have been fishelies and it seems likely that they will at spawned in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel and carried much the same levels as present. They return to Norfolk Bay as larvae by water movement substantial economic benefit to a relatively small A major settlement 1953 sustained substantial number of fishennen. The vessels involved and the fishing in 1955, ] 956 and 1957 -- some 300 million processors of the catch wiil have little significant scallops being taken those three years. impact on 1he region. Some small-scale commercial DespiTe regular scallop boats in and drop lining on the edge transit from Channel to l.he east cnnli1,,,,,,t�1 shelf will also be a feature of this coast grounds, during industry_ has been found sillce of Recreational has expanded dramatically in the past 20 years Tasman Peninsula, with a --- crayfish- is perhaps still the most impmtant, the Humher of substantial protected bays adjacent to abalone, is the most valuable. About 24 populru fishing grounds, is one of the major fish the waters of StOl1ll Bay and around recreational fishing areas in southern Tasmania. It Tasman Peninsula. Tn ] 9g5 these divers harvested seems likely thm most recreational fishing in this 328 tonnes of abalone. some 700 000 individual fish. area is conducted by residents, be they penn anent At today's prices this represents about $4 million to part-lime, Pirates Bay is an important game t1shing the divers. This has been ill existence for some centre hut unlikely 10 develop mueh more than its 22 .and Tasman has been a favoured present 5t8lJding due to competition from ofher centres site throughout that time. Following some early in wamler areas and to the depressed state of the the grounds have yielded a consi,lent wodd's stocks of southem hluefin tuna. Recreational almost 20 years and seem likely 10 cray continue to be productive whilst lhe present strict management mles apply. Fisheries 119 Whilst no reliable statistics exist on the amount are to annual licensing and rigorous ,:ontrols of fish by recreational fishemlen it is on impacl. Experience elsewhere has now, or in the near future, total demonstrated thal marine and tourism are recreational catches in this area may approach those complementary industries. themselves of commerCial fishermen. This growth of recreational attracl and the seafood produced fishing may not create significant demands on the on the fann::; is in demand by visitor�. infrastmcturc of the peninsula, other thal' those cfCated Niany rnar:ne fanris require no shore-based support by an increase in parl-lime residents. There may he facilities; thus if the farming ceases) the demands for additional jetties and boat ramps, together environrnent quickly retulus to original state. with some traffic congestion as recreational fishermen Thc government has recently announced a take trailerised boats to launching ramps. The moratorium on applications for new marine [arm sites appearance of some sheltered anchorages may in Tasmania, nevertheless applications under with an increase in permanent moorings consideratiun prior to the moratorium are likely to recreational vessels. result in some new salmon fauns in the area ant! one The most dramatic developments in the or two additional shellfish fmms. A govemmeni fisheries around Tasman Peninsula will be in the field to evaluate the of sca!lop- of marine fanning. Tasman Peninsula is a highly farms will, if successful, to several private desirable aquaculture site to its substantial scallop fanns in the vicinity of Tasman Peninsula. It expanses of semi-protected clean cold water, its is considered tbat Norfolk Bay will bc an attractive proximity to markets and the developed area for these operations. infrastructure at centres like N ubeena Dunalley. There are already seven marine farms established in the waters around the peninsu la alld a further seven CONCLUSION adjacent to Forestier Peninsula.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks
    1979/3. Groundwater, mineral resources and land stability in the Tasman Peninsula. W.C. Cromer, R.C. Donaldson P. C. Stevenson V.N. Threader Abstract Groundwater prospects, mineral deposits and land stability are discussed to provide information for a planning study of the Tasman Peninsula. INTRODUCTION This report was written at the request of the Commissioner for Town and Country Planning, and is the result of a map compilation, a search of records and field work during the period 20 - 24 November 1978. 1. Groundwater from fractured rocks P.C. Stevenson The amoun~ of water that may be obtained from the hard rocks of the Peninsula by boreholes is controlled by the composition and conditions of weathering and fracture. The amount of direct information is limited because only eight bore­ holes have been recorded, all at Koonya, Premaydena or Nubeena, but exper­ ience in other parts of the State enable some general comments to be made. The geology of the Peninsula is shown in Figure 1. The Jurassic dolerite, which forms many of the most rugged and remote parts of the Peninsula, has not been drilled for water but is regarded throughout Tasmania as an extremely poor prospect; very hard to drill, almost always dry and where water exists it is hard and saline. It cannot be recommended. The Permian mudstone and fine-grained sandstone have not been drilled in the Peninsula, but elsewhere are reliable producers of good quality groundwater. yields of 20 to 150 l/min and qualities of 200 - 600 mg/l of total dissolved solids are usual.
    [Show full text]
  • SORELL/TASMAN Recovery News Edition 5: 25 March 2013
    SORELL/TASMAN Recovery News Edition 5: 25 March 2013 Welcome to Recovery News. This newsletter will provide those affected by the recent bushfires with practical information and advice. There will be future editions providing updates as required. Victorian volunteers repay the favour When mother of 12 Megan Edwards returned to the fire- “Today, that same kindness is coming back to us,” Marian ravaged site of her family home in January, she didn’t know said. “It’s a great thing to know that people do care, and if she and her husband David had the strength to start that whatever good you do in this world comes back to again. But standing on her Murdunna block last week, where you ten-fold.” a small army of Victorian Rotary volunteers was erecting a shed and the fence for a new orchard, Megan said the family could again see a future. “For the first time we’re starting to say maybe and yes…,” Megan said, “That’s what this support means to us. It’s brought us a step closer to our new start.” The Edwards’ home was the first stop for a host of volunteer Rotarian workers from the Hazelwood Rotary Club, the Traralgon South Community, and the Callignee, Woori Yallock, It’s a step closer to a new start for Megan and David Edwards, with Churchill, Warburton, and Morwell areas of Victoria. their children Sarie-Anne, Uriah, Jasmine, Lilly, Nekoda, Seth, Willow and Emma-Lee. (Tammy, Eli, Simeon and Bridgit are absent). Photo by Marian Larner, a past president and now the Publicity Officer Coralie Walker, Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Capes Track
    DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Three Capes Track Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ISBN 978-0-9871899-2-9 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9871899-3-6 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2011 Cover image: Cape Pillar by Joe Shemesh Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2011, Draft Three Capes Track Development Proposal and Environmental Management Plan, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart CONTENTS Forward ............................................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Current Status of the Proposal ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Approvals Process
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Peninsula
    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Bay and Frederick Henry Bay Monitoring Program
    EPA Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Norfolk Bay, 2018-19 Introduction The EPA has undertaken to conduct water quality monitoring within Norfolk Bay (and Frederick Henry Bay) to assist in understanding of the marine environment and provide an independent validation of water quality data provided by the aquaculture industry. Aims To provide water quality information to increase the understanding of water quality within Norfolk Bay and Frederick Henry Bay To provide water quality information to assist nutrient dispersion modelling and biogeochemical model development and validation To provide independent validation of water quality information collected by (or on behalf of) Huon Aquaculture. Description Norfolk Bay forms the northern extent of the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farm Development Plan Area (MFDPA). The monitoring program is to commence during August 2018, prior to the Huon Aquaculture Permit Area being stocked with fish. Under the terms of Environmental Licence 9957 held by Huon Aquaculture, water quality monitoring is to be conducted at six (6) locations within Norfolk Bay and Fredrick Henry Bay. Of these five (5) were selected for monitoring under this program for validation purposes (See Table 1). Water quality data is to be collected on a monthly basis. Program commencement: August 2018 Scheduled completion: January 2019 Extension of the monitoring program is subject to review. An overview of the monitoring locations is shown in Table 1 and a map of the locations is shown in Figure 1. A list and overview of the environmental parameters to be collected is shown in Table 2. EPA Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Norfolk Bay 2018 1 Table 1: List and overview of monitoring locations WQ monitoring Distance from Site ID Location Easting Northing Latitude longitude Comments required lease boundary Nutrients, phytoplankton, ~13.3 km EPA-NB1 Eaglehawk Bay 567205 5237334 -43.0137 147.8247 field measurements Far-Field Nutrients, phytoplankton, ~ 600 m Baseline site 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW of VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION and SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS
    Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Voluntary Amalgamation and Shared Services Options 1 FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS: SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Author Local Government Board GPO Box 123 ISBN Hobart, TAS, 7001 978 0 7246 5748 7 Publisher Date Local Government Board August 2018 © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania July 2018 2 CONTENTS The Local Government Board 5 Abbreviations 6 Definitions 7 Foreword 8 Executive Summary 9 1. Introduction 13 1.1. Background to the Review 13 1.2. Scope of the Review 14 1.3. Process for the Review 17 2. Local Government Reform Context: Amalgamations and Shared Services 19 2.1. Insights from shared services 20 2.2. Insights from previous amalgamation processes and outcomes 22 2.3. Other recent Tasmanian shared services and voluntary amalgamation studies 24 3. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Municipal Areas 26 3.1. Introduction 26 3.2. Demography 27 3.3. Economy 30 3.4. Social 32 4. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Councils 34 4.1. Introduction 34 4.2. Current financial viability/performance 35 4.3. Councillors and staff 37 4.4. Current Shared Services Arrangements between Sorell and Tasman Councils 38 4.5. Role of Shared General Manager of Sorell and Tasman Councils 40 3 5. Stand-Alone Councils (Option 1 – No change) 41 5.1. Introduction 41 5.2. Financial Sustainability as Stand-Alone Councils: (10-20 year outlook) 42 5.3. Effective local representation 55 5.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Council 10/11
    Tasman Council 10/11 Tasman Council 10/11 TASMAN COUNCIL 1713 MAIN ROAD NUBEENA TAS 7184 PH 6250 9200 FX 6250 9220 [email protected] www.tasman.tas.gov.au 2 Tasman Council 10/11 MUNICIPALMUNICIPAL OVERVIEWOVERVIEW The Tasman municipality is located on Tasmania‟s picturesque southeast coast approximately 90 minutes from Hobart. As in many rural communities, Tasman‟s population is dispersed with the majori- ty of people centered in and around the township of Nubeena and the localities of White Beach, High- croft, Port Arthur, Premaydena, Saltwater River, Koonya, Taranna, Eaglehawk Neck and Murdunna. The municipal area covers approximately 659.3 square kilometres. Practically an island, the diversity and abundance of wildlife and plant life is truly remarkable. The population is relatively stable at approximately 2400, which swells to between 8,000 and 9,000 as a result of tourists and visitors during the summer months who come to enjoy favorable beaches, bush walking and fishing areas as well as many other tourist attractions. Tasman strives to be a welcoming community with an unbeatable quality of life which boasts a number of boating and sporting clubs with tourism services catering for all ages and interests. Tasman is also proving to be an attractive area for property developers, people seeking a „sea change‟ and retirees looking for a quieter lifestyle. The Tasman Peninsula was formally a bustling industrial zone fuelled by convict labor. In the era be- tween convict settlement and the introduction of the modern tourist industry the area was mostly en- gaged in timber and fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Act 1934 (Tas) [Transcript
    [Received from the Clerk of the Legislative Council the 10th day of January 1935 A.G. Brammall Registrar Supreme Court] TASMANIA. _________ THE CONSTITUTION ACT 1934. _________ ANALYSIS. PART I. – PRELIMINARY. Division III. – The Assembly. 1. Short title. 22. Constitution of the Assembly. 2. Repeal. 23. Triennial Parliaments. 3. Interpretation. 24. Election of Speaker. 25. Quorum of the Assembly. PART II. – THE CROWN. Division IV. – Electoral Divisions and 4. Parliament not dissolved by demise Qualifications Of Electors. of the Crown. 5. Demise of the Crown not to affect 26. Council Divisions. things done before proclamation 27. Assembly Divisions. thereof. 28. Qualification of electors for the 6. All appointments, &c., by the Gover- Legislative Council. nor to continue in force notwith- Joint tenants. standing demise of the Crown. 29. Assembly electors. 7. All civil or criminal process, and all contracts, bonds, and engagements Division V. – Disqualification; Vacation with or on behalf of His Majesty Of Office; Penalty. to subsist and continue notwith- standing demise. 30. Oath to be taken by members. 8. Deputy-Governor’s powers. 31. Commonwealth membership. Interpretation. 32. Office of profit. Exercise of powers by Deputy- 33. Contractors. Governor. 34. Vacation of office for other causes. Provision as to deputy of Lieutenant- 35. Penalty for sitting when disqualified. Governor or Administrator. Act to be retrospective. PART IV. – MONEY BILLS; POWERS OF HOUSES PART III. – PARLIAMENT. 36. Interpretation. Division I. – Both Houses. 37. Money bills to originate in the Assembly. 9. Continuation of existing Houses. 38. All money votes to be recommended Continuance in office of existing by the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development Information to Accompany
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY A REQUEST TO AMEND THE TASMAN PENINSULA AND NORFOLK BAY MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2005 This environmental impact statement has been prepared by; Tassal Operations Pty Ltd. G.P.O. Box 1645 Hobart Tasmania Australia 7001 Phone: 1300 TASSAL (1300 827725) Fax: 1300 880 179 Web: www.tassal.com.au E-mail: [email protected] ii GLOSSARY ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon Aquaculture Standard CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Rate GDA Geocentric Datum of Australia GPS Global Positioning System HAB Harmful Algal Bloom IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement MAST Marine and Safety Tasmania MFDP Marine Farming Development Plan MFPA Marine Farming Planning Act 1995 MFPRP Marine Farming Planning Review Panel PA Planning Authority PS Proposal Summary PSEG Proposal Specific Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines ROKAMBA Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement SCUBA Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus TSPA Threatened Species Protection Act iii 1 Table of Contents Contents GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................... III 1 ......... Table of Contents .......................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Mount Koonya Area
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE, Record 2003/08 ENERGY and RESOURCES Geology of the Mount Koonya area by S. M. Forsyth CONTENTS SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………… 5 Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………… 5 GEOLOGY ……………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Previous geological maps and investigations …………………………………………………… 6 Stratigraphy ………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Lower Parmeener Supergroup ……………………………………………………………… 7 Upper Parmeener Supergroup ……………………………………………………………… 7 Cygnet Coal Measures correlate — Permian? ………………………………………………… 7 Dominantly quartz sandstone sequence (Rqph) — Early Triassic ………………………………… 8 Interbedded siltstone, fine-grained sandstone and mudstone sequence (Rqm) — Early Triassic ………… 8 Quartz sandstone unit with granules (Rvvp) — Middle? Triassic………………………………… 9 Undifferentiated quartz rich lithic sandstone, quartz sandstone and mudstone (Rvv)— Middle Triassic … 10 Quaternary deposits ……………………………………………………………………… 10 Slope deposits …………………………………………………………………………… 10 Other Quaternary deposits ………………………………………………………………… 11 Igneous rocks ………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Jurassic dolerite …………………………………………………………………………… 11 Metamorphic effects of the dolerite …………………………………………………………… 12 Structure …………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Attitude of Upper Parmeener Supergroup …………………………………………………… 13 Dolerite structure ………………………………………………………………………… 13 Faults ……………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report for the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay
    Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report for the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farming Development Plan Area for the period June 2017 to May 2018 July 2018 AQUENAL www.aquenal.com.au Aquenal Pty Ltd Tasman Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report July 2018 Document Control and Distribution Document Date Name Company Version Copies Type 31/7/2018 Matt Barrenger Tassal Electronic 1.0 1 1/8/2018 Mark Churchill EPA Electronic 1.0 1 COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Aquenal Pty Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. DISCLAIMER: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Aquenal Pty Ltd’s client and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Aquenal Pty Ltd and its Client. Aquenal Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. 2 Aquenal Pty Ltd Tasman Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report July 2018 Table of Contents 1. Operational Summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Land Assessment and Classification Project Consultation Report and Recommended Allocations for the Municipality of Tasman
    Crown Land Assessment and Classification Project Consultation Report and Recommended Allocations for the Municipality of Tasman CLAC Project Team DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT March 2005 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................3 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................3 1.2 CONSULTATION PROCESS .....................................................................................................3 2 CONSULTATION REPORT...............................................................................................3 2.1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................3 2.2 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS ....................................................................................................4 2.2.1 Infrastructure on Coastal Land...................................................................................4 2.2.2 Land Transferred to Other Government Agency.........................................................5 2.2.3 Support for Suggested Allocation................................................................................5 2.2.4 Sufficiency of Reserve Category to Protect Values.....................................................6 2.2.5 Conservation Values that Require Reservation or other Protection...........................6
    [Show full text]