DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Energy Efficiency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Energy Efficiency The History of Energy Efficiency Alliance Commission on National Energy Efficiency Policy JANUARY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 HISTORICAL ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS IN THE US ........................................................................................ 4 Federal Policies ThaT imPacT energy eFFiciency: 1975 - PresenT ................................................................ 8 FEDERAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES BY TOPIC AREA ........................................................................................ 11 ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY COMPARISON .................................................................................................................... 12 U.S. States .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 International Comparisons ................................................................................................................................ 14 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 CASE STUDIES AND BEST PRACTICES ........................................................................................................................ 17 Local ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 State ................................................................................................................................................................... 19 International ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Utility ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Industry.............................................................................................................................................................. 26 DENSO Manufacturing ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Alliance Commission on National Energy Efficiency Policy The History of Energy Productivity 2 INTRODUCTION For the purposes of this report, energy productivity will be defined as “measuring the output and quality of goods and services generated with a given set of inputs. Energy productivity is the inverse of the energy intensity of GDP, measured as a ratio of energy inputs to GDP.”1 To properly project and channel the future of energy productivity in the United States, we must first look back at over forty years of the history of energy use in the nation. We also need to examine the role played by energy efficiency policies, including their successes and shortcomings. The energy challenges faced in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s provide experiences and lessons likely to apply in coming decades. The history of energy efficiency in the U.S. provides a vital reference and guide to any future national energy-efficiency strategy. The Alliance to Save Energy’s Commission on National Energy Efficiency Policy (ACNEEP) established a goal of doubling U.S. energy productivity by 2030 relative to 2011. The Commission seeks to identify policies and actions that will double the amount of economic output derived per unit of energy used in the U.S. economy. Economic outputs include both the quantity and quality of production and economic activity. A more energy productive economy should be a more economically productive economy that delivers a higher quantity and quality of goods and services while enhancing incomes, employment, and quality of life for Americans. Improving energy productivity can be thought of as getting greater bang for each energy buck spent. Over the years, federal and many state and local governments have adopted a broad array of public policies aimed at increasing energy efficiency and productivity. The rationales and policy instruments have varied by time and place, with some common themes, including using government policy to reduce energy costs and cost volatility, avoid or defer investments in higher-cost energy supply options, enhance energy security and reliability, shrink the environment footprint of energy production and delivery, and stem the flow of energy-related expenditures out of a region’s economy. By necessity, federal policies for energy efficiency have tended to focus on product standards and fiscal tools, which affect the efficiency profile of products and investments that enter the market. For example, federal policies include appliance efficiency standards, vehicle efficiency standards, and tax incentives for private firms to make an investment in a more efficient product. By contrast, state efficiency policies have tended to focus on things more directly in their jurisdiction: energy efficiency provisions in building codes; land-use planning tools and support for public transit to slow growth in vehicle trips and vehicle miles travelled; state tax incentives; and programs operated by electric and natural gas distribution utilities to enhance consumer adoption of efficiency measures. Time and again the business case for energy efficiency is supported through real economic savings. Without the numerous energy efficiency improvements made since 1973, the U.S. would require about 50% more energy to deliver our current GDP.2 The adoption of more efficient products and services is responsible for 60% to 75% of the increase in energy productivity since 1970.3 While every region in the country has shown leadership in some area of energy efficiency, California, the Northeast and Mid- Atlantic regions,4 parts of the country with some of nation’s highest energy prices, have made some of the greatest progress in improving energy efficiency .. Despite significant past progress, great potential remains to improve the energy-efficiency policies and programs in every state, which can help drive further large increase in U.S. energy productivity. Recognizing the differences in the structure and features of different regional economies and climate zones across the U.S., these opportunities for adoption of policies to support greater energy efficiency investments and actions are strong in states with high energy use per unit of economic product, per square foot of floor space, per capita, or other measures of energy intensity. Before delving into the history of U.S. energy efficiency policy, it is relevant to look at how the Alliance has contributed to doing more while using less energy over the last thirty-five years. In 1978, the Alliance launched its first national TV public service advertising campaign with Gregory Peck promoting energy conservation by declaring “Don’t Blow it America.” Jumping to the 1980s, the Alliance initiated new research programs promoting energy efficiency in private markets through innovative methods, designed the first methodology to evaluate energy efficiency as a resource for public utilities, and helped nonprofit organizations across the country finance efficiency improvements through pooled performance contracting. 1 Farrell, Remes, and Charles, “Fueling Sustainable Development,” 8. 2 Alliance to Save Energy, “American Energy Initiative.” 3 Mims, Bell, and Doig, “Assessing the Electric Productivity Gap,” 7. 4 Hendricks, Campbell, and Goodale, “Efficiency Works,” 25. Alliance Commission on National Energy Efficiency Policy The History of Energy Productivity 3 The 1990s was another productive decade for the Alliance with the launching of its corporate partnership Associate program, its international program, and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). At the same time, the Alliance contributed to energy- efficiency provisions in the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 and the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and helped secure a $45 million increase in funding for federal energy-efficiency programs in 1998. Since the beginning of the 2000s, the Alliance has advocated for energy efficiency at the federal, state, and local level. Among important recent milestones are: » helping negotiate rules to increase the efficiency of clothes washers 35% by 2007; » instituting the Power Save campus program to introduce energy efficiency concepts in California universities; » ensuring strong energy-efficiency provisions in the federal Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005; » launching the Drive Smarter Challenge consumer campaign, designed to encourage fuel efficient driving; » helping create the Clean and Efficiency Energy Program (CEEP), an initiative with public power partners that promotes energy efficiency investments by public power utilities; and » establishing the Alliance’s Commission on National Energy Efficiency Policy.5 HistORICAL ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS IN THE US Over the past forty years, the United States made significant gains in energy productivity. U.S. economic output expanded more than three times since 1970 while demand for energy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza Kretanja Cijene Nafte Obzirom Na Pandemiju COVID-A 19 I Usporedba S Povijesnim Kretanjem Na Svjetskom Tržištu
    Analiza kretanja cijene nafte obzirom na pandemiju COVID-a 19 i usporedba s povijesnim kretanjem na svjetskom tržištu Njirić, Marin Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2020 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Rudarsko-geološko-naftni fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:169:342279 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-26 Repository / Repozitorij: Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering Repository, University of Zagreb SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU RUDARSKO-GEOLOŠKO-NAFTNI FAKULTET Preddiplomski studij naftnog rudarstva ANALIZA KRETANJA CIJENE NAFTE OBZIROM NA PANDEMIJU COVID-a 19 I USPOREDBA S POVIJESNIM KRETANJEM NA SVJETSKOM TRŽIŠTU Završni rad Marin Njirić N4350 Zagreb, 2020 Sveučilište u Zagrebu Završni rad Rudarsko-geološko-naftni fakultet ANALIZA KRETANJA CIJENE NAFTE OBZIROM NA PANDEMIJU COVID-a 19 I USPOREDBA S POVIJESNIM KRETANJEM NA SVJETSKOM TRŽIŠTU Marin Njirić Završni rad je izrađen: Sveučilište u Zagrebu Rudarsko-geološko-naftni fakultet Zavod za naftno-plinsko inženjerstvo i energetiku Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb Sažetak U svjetskoj ekonomiji nafta zauzima jednu od najvažnijih uloga za gospodarski razvoj svake zemlje. S obzirom da je izuzetno bitna sirovina, njena cijena utječe na sve grane gospodarstva, kretanja svjetskih političkih i gospodarskih trendova, kretanje indeksa na burzama te stanje svjetskog gospodarstva općenito. Tijekom povijesti, događali su se razni preokreti cijena nafte, čime bi mnoge zemlje ili tvrtke profitirale ili upale u krizu. U razdoblju COVID-a, cijena je drastično potonula te se u ovom radu prati taj pad cijene u usporedbi s cijenama tijekom prijašnjih kriza u povijesti.
    [Show full text]
  • Kateri Callahan President, Alliance to Save Energy
    Financing Energy-Efficient Infrastructure Unpacking The Toolbox of Best Practices and Partnerships Kateri Callahan President, Alliance to Save Energy ACEEE Energy Efficiency Finance Forum May 22, 2017 www.ase.org What Is the Alliance to Save Energy? • Structure Policy –Nonprofit organization headquartered in U.S. Leaders –International reach, but focus on federal energy efficiency policy • Vision Business Environmental Leaders Groups –A nation that uses energy more productively to achieve economic growth, a cleaner environment and greater energy security, affordability and reliability Academia • Organization –Founded in 1977—celebrating our 40th year! –Staff of 25 professionals –$7 million annual budget www.ase.org Board of Directors Honorary Chair Corporate Co-Chair First Honorary Vice Chairs Sen. Jeanne Shaheen Gil Quiniones Sen. Chris Coons Sen. Rob Portman (D-N.H.) CEO, NYPA (D-Del.) (R-Ohio) Honorary Vice Chairs Rep. Michael Burgess Sen. Susan Collins Rep. Adam Kinzinger Sen. Ed Markey Rep. David McKinley Sen. Lisa Murkowski Rep. Paul Tonko (R-Texas) (R-Maine) (R-Ill.) (D-Mass.) (R-W.Va.) (R-Alaska) (D-N.Y.) Sen. Mark Warner Rep. Peter Welch Sen. Ron Wyden Kandeh Yumkella www.ase.org (D–Va.) (D-Vt.) (D-Ore.) Former CEO, SEforAll Board of Directors www.ase.org Looking Back to ARRA: Infrastructure Investments in Smart Grid • DOE Investments of Over $31 Billion in Projects Across the Country –$4.5 billion for modernization of the nation’s electric grid –Private electric sector funding matched to total more than $9.5 billion • Documented
    [Show full text]
  • History of Energy
    CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF HISTORY OF ENERGY Editor C. CLEVELAND Boston University, Boston, MA, USA ELSEVIER Amsterdam—Boston—Heidelberg—London—New York—Oxford Paris—San Diego—San Francisco—Singapore—Sydney—Tokyo CONTENTS Editor's Preface vii Alphabetical List of Articles ix c Coal Industry, History of Jaak J K Daemen 1 Coal Mining in Appalachia, History of Geoffrey L Buckley 17 Conservation Measures for Energy, History of John H Gibbons, Holly L Gwin 27 Conservation of Energy Concept, History of Elizabeth Garber 36 E Early Industrial World, Energy Flow in Richard D Periman 45 Economic Thought, History of Energy in Paul Christensen 53 Ecosystems and Energy: History and Overview Charles AS Hall 65 Electricity Use, History of David E Nye 77 Energy in the History and Philosophy of Science Robert P Crease 90 Environmental Change and Energy 1 G Simmons 94 F Fire: A Socioecological and Historical Survey Johan Goudsblom 105 G Geographic Thought, History of Energy in Barry D Solomon, Martin J pasqualetti 117 H Hydrogen, History of Seth Dunn 127 Hydropower, History and Technology of John S Gulliver, Roger E A Arndt 138 M Manufactured Gas, History of Joel A Tarr 153 N Natural Gas, History of Christopher J Castaneda 163 Nuclear Power, History of Robert J Duffy 175 Contents O Oil Crises, Historical Perspective Mamdouh G Salameh 189 Oil Industry, History of August W Giebelhaus 203 OPEC Market Behavior, 1973-2003 A F Alhajji 215 OPEC, History of Fadhil J Chalabi 228 P Prices of Energy, History of Peter Berck, Michael J Roberts 241 Q Sociopolitical Collapse, Energy and Joseph A Tainter 251 Solar Energy, History of John Perlin 265 T Thermodynamic Sciences, History of Keith Hutchison 281 Transitions in Energy Use Arnulf Grübler 287 w War and Energy Vaclav Smil 301 Wind Energy, History of Martin Pasqualetti, Robert Righter, Paul Gipe 309 Wood Energy, History of John Perlin 323 World History and Energy Vaclav Smil 331 List of Contributors 343 Subject Index 345 vi.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges
    QUADRENNIAL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW AN ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES Chapter 1: Energy Challenges September 2015 1 Energy Challenges Energy is the Engine of the U.S. Economy Quadrennial Technology Review 1 1 Energy Challenges 1.1 Introduction The United States’ energy system, vast in size and increasingly complex, is the engine of the economy. The national energy enterprise has served us well, driving unprecedented economic growth and prosperity and supporting our national security. The U.S. energy system is entering a period of unprecedented change; new technologies, new requirements, and new vulnerabilities are transforming the system. The challenge is to transition to energy systems and technologies that simultaneously address the nation’s most fundamental needs—energy security, economic competitiveness, and environmental responsibility—while providing better energy services. Emerging advanced energy technologies can do much to address these challenges, but further improvements in cost and performance are important.1 Carefully targeted research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RDD&D) are essential to achieving these improvements and enabling us to meet our nation’s energy objectives. This report, the 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review (QTR 2015), examines science and technology RDD&D opportunities across the entire U.S. energy system. It focuses primarily on technologies with commercialization potential in the mid-term and beyond. It frames various tradeoffs that all energy technologies must balance, across such dimensions as diversity and security of supply, cost, environmental impacts, reliability, land use, and materials use. Finally, it provides data and analysis on RDD&D pathways to assist decision makers as they set priorities, subject to budget constraints, to develop more secure, affordable, and sustainable energy services.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Energy in an Electric Field
    Internal energy in an electric field In an electric field, if the dipole moment is changed, the change of the energy is, U E P Using Einstein notation dU Ek dP k This is part of the total derivative of U dU TdSij d ij E kK dP H l dM l Make a Legendre transformation to the Gibbs potential G(T, H, E, ) GUTSijij EP kK HM l l SGTE data for pure elements http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036459169190030N Gibbs free energy GUTSijij EP kK HM l l dG dU TdS SdTijij d ij d ij E kk dP P kk dE H l dM l M l dH l dU TdSij d ij E kK dP H l dM l dG SdTij d ij P k dE k M l dH l G G G G total derivative: dG dT d dE dH ij k l T ij EH k l G G ij Pk E ij k G G M l S Hl T Direct and reciprocal effects (Maxwell relations) Useful to check for errors in experiments or calculations Maxwell relations Useful to check for errors in experiments or calculations Point Groups Crystals can have symmetries: rotation, reflection, inversion,... x 1 0 0 x y 0 cos sin y z 0 sin cos z Symmetries can be represented by matrices. All such matrices that bring the crystal into itself form the group of the crystal. AB G for A, B G 32 point groups (one point remains fixed during transformation) 230 space groups Cyclic groups C2 C4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_group 2G Pyroelectricity i Ei T Pyroelectricity is described by a rank 1 tensor Pi i T 1 0 0 x x x 0 1 0 y y y 0 0 1 z z 0 1 0 0 x x 0 0 1 0 y y 0 0 0 1 z z 0 Pyroelectricity example Turmalin: point group 3m Quartz, ZnO, LaTaO 3 for T = 1°C, E ~ 7 ·104 V/m Pyroelectrics have a spontaneous polarization.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Sustainable Energy Accelerating Energy Transition in the UNECE Region
    UNEC E Pathways to Sustainable Energy Accelerating Energy Transition in the UNECE Region Energy underpins economic development and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and has a critical role to play in climate change mitigation. The recognition of the role that energy plays in modern society is highly signicant, however, there remains an important disconnection between agreed energy and climate targets and the Pathways to Sustainable Energy • Accelerating Transition in the UNECE Region approaches in place today to achieve them. Only international cooperation and innovation can deliver the accelerated and more ambitious strategies. Policies will be needed to ll the persistent gaps to achieve the 2030 Agenda. If the gaps are not addressed urgently, progressively more drastic and expensive measures will be required to avoid extreme and potentially unrecoverable social impacts as countries try to cope with climate change. This report uniquely focuses on sustainable energy in the UNECE region up to 2050 as regional economic cooperation is an important factor in achieving sustainable energy. Arriving at a state of attaining sustainable energy is a complex social, political, economic and technological challenge. The UNECE countries have not agreed on how collectively they will achieve energy for sustainable development. Given the role of the UNECE to promote economic cooperation it is important to explore the implications of dierent sustainable energy pathways and for countries to work together on developing and deploying policies and measures. Pathways to Sustainable Energy Accelerating Energy Transition in the UNECE Region 67UNECE Energy Series UNIT Palais des Nations CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland E Telephone: +41(0)22 917 12 34 D E-mail: [email protected] N A Website: www.unece.org TION S UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Pathways to Sustainable Energy - Accelerating Energy Transition in the UNECE Region ECE ENERGY SERIES No.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Aceon and Launching Our Virtual Power Plant
    Introducing AceOn And Launching Our Virtual Power Plant APSE Webinar 10 November 2020 AceOn Group +44 (0)1952 293 388 Unit 9B “Offering solutions today for [email protected] tomorrow’s world” Stafford Park 12 Telford www.aceongroup.com TF3 3BJ 1 INTRODUCING THE ACEON & RENEWERGY TEAM Richard Partington – Managing Director of AceOn Energy. Previously over 30 years in local government including 8 years as Managing Director of Telford & Wrekin Council. Mark Thompson – Director. Over 30 years’ experience in Battery Energy Storage and the design, manufacture and supply of batteries and battery packs. Loic Hares – Partner. Over 6 years’ experience working for ‘Big 6’ energy providers, acting as a consultant in the UK energy industry, and helping energy start-ups build successful operations Alex Thompson – Sales Director. 8 years’ experience in Energy storage, batteries and battery packs “AceOn and Renewergy have a unique combination of a wealth of experience across the public and private sectors as well in-depth knowledge of the battery storage and energy sectors” CONTENTS OF TODAY’S WEBINAR THE FORMAL LAUNCH OF RENEWERGY – ACEON’S VIRTUAL POWER PLANT 1. Overview of the Electricity Market, Issues, Challenges & Opportunities – Dr Neil Williams 2. Overview of AceOn & Introducing RENEWERGY, Our Virtual Power Plant – Richard Partington 3. How RENEWERGY Works In Detail – Loic Hares 4. Explaining The Hardware Behind RENEWERGY – NOT ALL BATTERIES ARE THE SAME! – Alex Thompson 5. Summary of The Benefits of RENEWERGY – Richard Partington 6. Questions 3 DR NEIL WILLIAMS Our Special Guest today – DR NEIL WILLIAMS Neil is an investor and advisor in the energy, cleantech and mobility sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Energy, Heat, and Work
    3. Energy, Heat, and Work 3.1. Energy 3.2. Potential and Kinetic Energy 3.3. Internal Energy 3.4. Relatively Effects 3.5. Heat 3.6. Work 3.7. Notation and Sign Convention In these Lecture Notes we examine the basis of thermodynamics – fundamental definitions and equations for energy, heat, and work. 3-1. Energy. Two of man's earliest observations was that: 1)useful work could be accomplished by exerting a force through a distance and that the product of force and distance was proportional to the expended effort, and 2)heat could be ‘felt’ in when close or in contact with a warm body. There were many explanations for this second observation including that of invisible particles traveling through space1. It was not until the early beginnings of modern science and molecular theory that scientists discovered a true physical understanding of ‘heat flow’. It was later that a few notable individuals, including James Prescott Joule, discovered through experiment that work and heat were the same phenomenon and that this phenomenon was energy: Energy is the capacity, either latent or apparent, to exert a force through a distance. The presence of energy is indicated by the macroscopic characteristics of the physical or chemical structure of matter such as its pressure, density, or temperature - properties of matter. The concept of hot versus cold arose in the distant past as a consequence of man's sense of touch or feel. Observations show that, when a hot and a cold substance are placed together, the hot substance gets colder as the cold substance gets hotter.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Minimum Principle
    ESCI 341 – Atmospheric Thermodynamics Lesson 12 – The Energy Minimum Principle References: Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, Callen Physical Chemistry, Levine THE ENTROPY MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE We’ve seen that a reversible process achieves maximum thermodynamic efficiency. Imagine that I am adding heat to a system (dQin), converting some of it to work (dW), and discarding the remaining heat (dQout). We’ve already demonstrated that dQout cannot be zero (this would violate the second law). We also have shown that dQout will be a minimum for a reversible process, since a reversible process is the most efficient. This means that the net heat for the system (dQ = dQin dQout) will be a maximum for a reversible process, dQrev dQirrev . The change in entropy of the system, dS, is defined in terms of reversible heat as dQrev/T. We can thus write the following inequality dQ dQ dS rev irrev , (1) T T Notice that for Eq. (1), if the system is reversible and adiabatic, we get dQ dS 0 irrev , T or dQirrev 0 which illustrates the following: If two states can be connected by a reversible adiabatic process, then any irreversible process connecting the two states must involve the removal of heat from the system. Eq. (1) can be written as dS dQ T (2) The equality will hold if all processes in the system are reversible. The inequality will hold if there are irreversible processes in the system. For an isolated system (dQ = 0) the inequality becomes dS 0 isolated system , which is just a restatement of the second law of thermodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 20 -- Thermodynamics
    ChapterChapter 2020 -- ThermodynamicsThermodynamics AA PowerPointPowerPoint PresentationPresentation byby PaulPaul E.E. TippensTippens,, ProfessorProfessor ofof PhysicsPhysics SouthernSouthern PolytechnicPolytechnic StateState UniversityUniversity © 2007 THERMODYNAMICSTHERMODYNAMICS ThermodynamicsThermodynamics isis thethe studystudy ofof energyenergy relationshipsrelationships thatthat involveinvolve heat,heat, mechanicalmechanical work,work, andand otherother aspectsaspects ofof energyenergy andand heatheat transfer.transfer. Central Heating Objectives:Objectives: AfterAfter finishingfinishing thisthis unit,unit, youyou shouldshould bebe ableable to:to: •• StateState andand applyapply thethe first andand second laws ofof thermodynamics. •• DemonstrateDemonstrate youryour understandingunderstanding ofof adiabatic, isochoric, isothermal, and isobaric processes.processes. •• WriteWrite andand applyapply aa relationshiprelationship forfor determiningdetermining thethe ideal efficiency ofof aa heatheat engine.engine. •• WriteWrite andand applyapply aa relationshiprelationship forfor determiningdetermining coefficient of performance forfor aa refrigeratior.refrigeratior. AA THERMODYNAMICTHERMODYNAMIC SYSTEMSYSTEM •• AA systemsystem isis aa closedclosed environmentenvironment inin whichwhich heatheat transfertransfer cancan taketake place.place. (For(For example,example, thethe gas,gas, walls,walls, andand cylindercylinder ofof anan automobileautomobile engine.)engine.) WorkWork donedone onon gasgas oror workwork donedone byby gasgas INTERNALINTERNAL
    [Show full text]
  • Using Four Different Online Media Sources to Forecast the Crude Oil Price
    Using Four Different Online Media Sources to Forecast the Crude Oil Price Elshendy, M., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Battistoni, E. & Gloor, P. A. This is the accepted manuscript after the review process, but prior to final layout and copyediting. Please cite as: Elshendy, M., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Battistoni, E. & Gloor, P. A. (2018). Using Four Different Online Media Sources to Forecast the Crude Oil Price. Journal of Information Science, 44(3), 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517698298 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. 2 Using Four Different Online Media Sources to Forecast the Crude Oil Price Mohammed Elshendy Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy. Andrea Fronzetti Colladon Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy. Elisa Battistoni Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy. Peter A. Gloor MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US. Abstract This study looks for signals of economic awareness on online social media and tests their significance in economic predictions. The study analyses, over a period of two years, the relationship between the West Texas Intermediate daily crude oil price and multiple predictors extracted from Twitter, Google Trends, Wikipedia, and the Global Data on Events, Language, and Tone database (GDELT). Semantic Analysis is applied to study the sentiment, emotionality and complexity of the language used.
    [Show full text]