DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstract When Discussing the Old Testament Concept That the Lord

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstract When Discussing the Old Testament Concept That the Lord Abstract When discussing the Old Testament concept that the Lord chose Zion and/or Jerusalem, there is a tendency amongst scholars to do so 1) part and parcel with a discussion of Deuteronomy’s Centralization Formula and 2) synonymously with other ideas of the election of Zion and/or Jerusalem. Unfortunately, this tendency neglects important considerations. This study investigates the Old Testament passages that explicitly mention the Lord’s choice of Zion and/or Jerusalem. These fourteen passages, all of with the Lord as the subject and either Zion or בחר which employ the verbal root Jerusalem as the object, constitute what has been coined the theme of the Lord’s choice of Zion/Jerusalem. In Part 1, the semantics of the theme are investigated. It is determined that this theme simultaneously draws upon Jerusalem’s cultic prestige and its connection with the Davidic dynasty. More specifically, with the exception of the occurrences of the theme in First Zechariah, all the occurrences display an explicit association with either the Deuteronomic ideology of centralization or particular ideological elements of the Davidic tradition. In 1 Kgs 11:29-39 many of these nuances converge. Through a redaction-critical investigation of this pericope, it is determined that this theme exhibits a history of development, wherein the earliest phase of the theme’s existence is intimately ideology of the Davidic tradition. In Part 2, the socio-historical נִ יר associated with the and literary-critical issues that bear upon the theme’s usage and development are investigated. This study reaches two major conclusions. First, the theme of the Lord’s choice of Zion/Jerusalem is a distinct thematic thread within the more extensive theme of the election of Zion/Jerusalem. Therefore, to speak of the Lord’s choice of Zion/Jerusalem and the election of Zion/Jerusalem interchangeably, without distinction, is imprecise. Second, while this theme was utilized for approximately two hundred years, it exhibits three identifiable phases of development, wherein the theme’s emphasis upon the Davidic facet in its earliest phase moves through a phase exhibiting a relative balance between facets and into a phase emphasizing the cultic facet. In phase one, the cultic facet informs the more salient issue, the privileged position of the Davidic dynasty for Ancient Israel. In phase two, the Davidic and cultic facets are brought into relative balance, and it is at this point that the ideology of the Lord’s choice of Jerusalem is explicitly linked to Deuteronomy’s Centralization Formula. Incidentally, to discuss the idea of the divine choice of Zion/Jerusalem part and parcel with Deuteronomy’s ideology of centralization is also imprecise. In phase three, the Davidic facet informs the more salient connotation of Zion/Jerusalem’s cultic prestige. There is reason to believe that the demise of the theme’s usage is linked to the absence of a Davidic descendent as a viable socio-political option for the community, and First Zechariah’s peculiar usage of the theme provides important evidence to support this conclusion. DISSERTATION APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation, entitled “For the Sake of Jerusalem, the City Which I Have Chosen”: On the Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem and Its Development in the Old Testament written by David Benjamin Schreiner and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been read and approved by the undersigned members of the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary ______________________________ Dr. Bill T. Arnold, Mentor ______________________________ Dr. Lawson G. Stone, Reader ______________________________ Dr. Michael D. Matlock, Examiner May 2012 “For the Sake of Jerusalem, the City Which I Have Chosen”: On the Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem and Its Development in the Old Testament A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary Wilmore, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy Dissertation Committee: Dr. Bill Arnold, Mentor Dr. Lawson Stone, Reader Dr. Michael Matlock, Examiner By David B. Schreiner May, 2012 Copyright 2012 David Benjamin Schreiner All rights reserved Table of Contents Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Prologue .............................................................................................................................. 1 Part 1: A Focused Investigation of the Theme of the Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem . 10 Chapter 1: An Introduction ............................................................................................... 12 1.1 Introduction to the Davidic Tradition................................................................. 13 1.2 Introduction to the Zion Tradition ...................................................................... 18 1.3 The Roots of the Davidic and Zion Traditions ................................................... 27 1.4 Synopsis and Conclusions .................................................................................. 34 Chapter 2: The Election of Zion/Jerusalem and the Theme of the Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem .................................................................................................................. 36 2.1 Methodological Considerations .............................................................................. 36 Passages .................... 38 בחר-The Election of Zion/Jerusalem According to the Non 2.2 2.2.1. Election and the Royal Institution................................................................... 38 2.2.2 Election and Future Restoration....................................................................... 45 2.2.3 Election and Divine Presence .......................................................................... 55 2.2.4 Miscellaneous Statements of Election ............................................................. 57 2.2.5 Election and Judgment ..................................................................................... 59 2.2.6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 61 Passages; The Theme of the בחר The Election of Zion/Jerusalem According to the 2.3 Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem.................................................................................. 61 2.3.1 The Choice of Jerusalem in 1 and 2 Kings and 1 and 2 Chronicles ................ 62 2.3.2 The Choice of Zion in Psalms .......................................................................... 78 2.3.3 The Choice of Jerusalem in Zechariah............................................................. 82 2.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 93 Chapter 3: The Lord’s Choice of Jerusalem and the Redaction of 1 Kgs 11:29-39 ......... 97 3.1 A Selected Forschungsgeschichte ........................................................................... 98 3.2 A Text-critical Discussion of 1 Kgs 11:29-39 ...................................................... 102 3.3 A Redactional Reconstruction .............................................................................. 106 i 3.3.1 The Tearing Away of the Kingdom ............................................................... 107 3.3.2 Syntactical Observations in 1 Kgs 11:29-39 .................................................. 110 3.3.3 A History of 1 Kgs 11:29-39 ......................................................................... 113 3.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 116 Passages of Kings and their Relationship to the Theme of the Lord’s נִ יר Chapter 4: The Choice of Zion/Jerusalem ............................................................................................... 119 Passages ................................ 119 נִ יר Initial Semantic Considerations of the Davidic 4.1 Passages ............................................................. 122 נִ יר The Function of the Davidic 4.2 4.2.1 Methodological Considerations ..................................................................... 123 Passages in Kings ................................................ 125 נִ יר An Examination of the 4.2.2 4.3 Final Assessment of Polzin’s Proposal and Conclusions ..................................... 140 Conclusion to Part 1 ........................................................................................................ 144 Part 2: Socio-historical and Literary Critical Issues Informing the Theme of the Lord’s Choice of Zion/Jerusalem ............................................................................................... 146 Chapter 5: A Historical Sketch ....................................................................................... 147 Chapter 6: Deuteronomy’s Ideology of Centralization ................................................... 163 6.1 Methodological Considerations ............................................................................ 164 6.2 An Analysis ........................................................................................................... 167 6.3 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 178 Chapter 7: The Literary Context of 1 and 2 Kings ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timeline of Old Testament Books & Their Parts
    Timeline of Old Testament Books & their Parts Timeline Historical Circumstances Torah/Pentateuch Historical Books Writings/Wisdom Lit. Prophets 1000 BC United Monarchy Yahwists begin national epic Psalms (1000–400s?) under David & Solomon Proverbs (950–450?) 922 Divided Monarchy Elohists write national epic for Elijah and Elisha Northern Kingdom = Israel the north capital, Samaria Southern Kingdom = Judah Hosea and Amos preach in capital Jerusalem Israel; Micah preaches in Judah 760 Isaiah of Jerusalem advises Assyria destroys Israel Judean king against alliances 721 (most of Isa 1–39) and reduces Judah to a vassal state; then must pull troops out to fight Babylon back in the East Job (600s–400s?) Deuteronomists edit Amos 622 King Josiah reunifies nation (2:4-5; 3:7) Deuteronomists (Josiah’s Deuteronomists write Joshua, under the old covenant, then is scribes) merge J and E and Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Nahum prophesies against As- killed at the Battle of Megiddo in syria just before Babylonians de- take up the story from Moses’ Kings 609 BCE stroy it; Zephaniah prophesies final words to a history of the Ruth? 587 Babylon destroys Judah vs. idol worship; Habakkuk people in the promised land; prophesies of the coming Baby- kills Davidic line and exiles top Dtrs write and revise through the lonian threat leadership to Babylon, but then Babylonian Exile must fight off Persia to east Jeremiah and Ezekiel 539 Persia defeats Babylon Priestly writers regroup nation, The Chronicler writes 1 & 2 prophesy before and through and allows the Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • David's Heir: the Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic King
    David’s Heir: The Five Prophecies of the Davidic Covenant; Three Words in the Covenant Establishing Perpetuity of Davidic Kings: “House, Kingdom, Throne,” 2 Sam 7:16; Matthew’s Messianic Genealogy of Jesus: the Chart Pedigree, Matt 1:1; Uses of the Title “Messiah”: the Anointed One, Ps 18:50; 89:20, 28–29, 34–36; 132:11 16. The Lord now reveals to Nathan the eternal significance of this covenant to David: 2 Samuel 7:16 - “Your [ David’s ] house [ the Davidic bloodline ] and your kingdom [ Israel ] shall endure before Me forever [ the kingdom is permanent ]; your throne shall be established forever [ rulership of the Davidic line through Christ is eternal ]. v. 17 - In accordance with all these words and all these visions, so did Nathan communicate the Davidic Covenant to David. 17. There are five prophecies contained in the Davidic Covenant: (1) David will have a son that will succeed him on the throne of Israel and who will establish his kingdom. (2) That son will be Solomon; it is he that will build the temple. (3) The Davidic dynasty on the throne of Israel is established for eternity. (4) Even though Solomon will fail, enter reversionism, and become involved in idolatry, the covenant will not be broken but remain in force. (5) The house of David, his throne, and his kingdom are established forever. 18. The Lord uses three words in the covenant that expresses the immutability of David’s right to the throne of Israel. 19. The word “house” is ty]B^ (bayith) and it refers to the dynasty of a monarch, in this case the house of David.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Ordinary People with an Extraordinary Story A
    TEN ORDINARY PEOPLE WITH AN EXTRAORDINARY STORY When you read Genesis 18, you’re actually picking up the story of how God is continually orchestrating His plan to make Israel a great nation. It’s the story of how one nation, born of an ordinary man and an ordinary woman with more than their share of problems changed the history of the world—for eternity. So if that sounds like you and you wonder how you could be of any significant value to the Kingdom of God—then listen up this morning, because this story is for you. Read Genesis 14; 18-19 Lot was Abraham’s nephew. In Genesis 14, Lot is given a chance to choose which part of the Promised Land he wants for his own. He selects an area known as Sodom – which bears the namesake for the word sodomy—which seems like a questionable decision about where to relocate your family—but like I said, the Bible isn’t afraid to take us places where ordinary people make messy decisions. This whole enterprise is based on a promise from God to Abraham, that he would have a son; and his children’s children would eventually grow into a vast nation of God-fearing people. But that takes a few hundred years, so in the meanwhile, Lot and Abraham are doing OK. Lot raises a family in the land of the Sodomites and gets himself elected as a judge. Then he finds himself in the middle of a war between two tribal groups and Uncle Abraham has to gather his 318 Navy Seals of the day to rescue Lot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wives of Solomon
    THE WIVES OF SOLOMON. BY MONCURE D. CONWAY. " CCORDING to the first book of Kings, Solomon's half-brother, ft Adonijah, after the defeat of an alleged (perhaps mythical) effort to recover the throne of which he had been defrauded, sub­ mitted himself to Solomon. He had become enamored of the vir­ gin who had been brought to the aged King David to try to revive some vitality in him; and he came to Bathsheba asking her to re­ quest her son the king to give him this damsel as his wife. Bath­ sheba proffered this "small petition" for Adonijah, but Solomon was enraged, and ironically suggested that she should ask the king­ dom itself for Adonijah, whom he straightway ordered to execu­ tion. The immediate context indicates that Solomon suspected in this petition a plot against his throne. A royal father's harem was inherited by a royal son, and its possession is supposed to have in­ volved certain rights of succession: this is the only interpretation I have ever heard of the extreme violence of Solomon. But I have never been satisfied with this explanation. Would Adonijah have requested, or Bathsheba asked as a "small" thing, a favor touch­ ing the king's tenure? The story as told in the Book of Kings appears diplomatic, and several details suggest that in some earlier legend the strife between the half- brothers had a more romantic relation to "Abishag the Shunammite," who is described as "very fair." Abishag is interpreted as meaning "father of error," and though that translation is of doubtful accuracy, its persistence in­ dicates the place occupied by her in early tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture: the Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A
    The Authority of Scripture: The Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A. Nagasawa, June 2005 Four Main Differences in the Genealogies Provided by Matthew and Luke 1. Is Jesus descended through the line of Solomon (Mt) or the line of Nathan (Lk)? Or both? 2. Are there 27 people from David to Jesus (Mt) or 42 (Lk)? 3. Who was Joseph’s father? Jacob (Mt) or Heli (Lk)? 4. What is the lineage of Shealtiel and Zerubbabel? a. Are they the same father-son pair in Mt as in Lk? (Apparently popular father-son names were repeated across families – as with Jacob and Joseph in Matthew’s genealogy) If not, then no problem. I will, for purposes of this discussion, assume that they are not the same father-son pair. b. If so, then there is another problem: i. Who was Shealtiel’s father? Jeconiah (Mt) or Neri (Lk)? ii. Who was Zerubbabel’s son? Abihud (Mt) or Rhesa (Lk)? And where are these two in the list of 1 Chronicles 3:19-20 ( 19b the sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam and Hananiah, and Shelomith was their sister; 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed, five)? Cultural Factors 1. Simple remarriage. It is likely that in most marriages, men were older and women were younger (e.g. Joseph and Mary). So it is also likely that when husbands died, many women remarried. This was true in ancient times: Boaz married the widow Ruth, David married the widow Bathsheba after Uriah was killed. It also seems likely to have been true in classical, 1 st century times: Paul (in Rom.7:1-3) suggests that this is at least somewhat common in the Jewish community (‘I speak to those under the Law’ he says) in the 1 st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Athaliah, a Treacherous Queen: a Careful Analysis of Her Story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21
    Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 Robin Gallaher Branch School of Biblical Sciences & Bible Languages Potchefstroom Campus North-West University POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 This article presents a critical look at the story of the reign of Athaliah, the only ruling queen of Israel or Judah in the biblical text. Double reference in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles shows her story’s importance and significance to the biblical writers. The largely parallel accounts read like a contemporary soap opera, for they contain murder, intrigue, harem politics, religious upheaval, and coup and counter-coup. Her story provides insights on the turbulent political climate of the ninth century BC. However, the purpose of the biblical writers is not to show Athaliah as the epitome of evil or that all women in power are evil. Opsomming Atalia, ’n verraderlike koningin: ’n noukeurige analise van haar verhaal in 2 Konings 11 en 2 Kronieke 22:10-23:21 In hierdie artikel word die verhaal van Atalia krities nagegaan. Atalia was naamlik die enigste koninging van Israel of Juda wie se regeringstyd in die Bybelteks verhaal word. Die dubbele verwysings na hierdie tyd in 2 Konings en 2 Kronieke dui op die belangrikheid en betekenis van haar verhaal vir die Bybel- skrywers. Die twee weergawes wat grotendeels parallelle weer- gawes is, lees byna soos ’n hedendaagse sepie, want hierdie verhale sluit elemente in soos moord, intrige, harempolitiek, godsdiensopstand, staatsgreep en kontrastaatsgreep.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Wife and Heterosexual Incestuous
    Judaica Ukrainica I (2012), 29–46 No Name WomaN: Noah’s Wife aNd heterosexual iNcestuous relatioNs iN GeNesis 9:18–29 corinne e. Blackmer Southern Connecticut State University [email protected] [Noah’s wife] was a nameless woman, and so at home among all those who were never found and never missed, who were uncommemorated, whose deaths were not remarked, nor their begettings1. I. The terse language and riddling innuendo of Gen 9:18–29, which narrates how Noah comes to curse Canaan, the son of Ham, has engaged the inter­ pretive energies of readers since the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud spe­ culated that Ham had castrated his father2. The language of this narrative, bristling with obscure phrases, loud hints of dreadful sexual transgression, and pious cover ups, has often left subsequent interpreters sensing that the story has meanings that the narrator declines to delineate. Indeed, the only thing that remains clear is that Gen 9:18–29 functions as an etiological myth to justify the permanent subordination of the tribes of Canaan. Canaan commits an un­ speakable sexual crime against Noah’s family that results in the subsequent physical displacement and sweeping rejection of the customs of the Canaanite peoples. Indeed, Israel’s secure possession of the Promised Land is predicated on repudiating the cultural institutions of the preceding Canaanites. Whatever the larger and associated issues, however, interpretive positions have gener­ 30 Corinne E. BLACKMER ally revolved around two broad questions. What was the nature of Ham’s of­ fense, such that when he “saw his father’s nakedness” and told his brothers, Shem and Japheth, it merited the terrible curse of permanent servitude Noah pronounced over him3? Second, what was the rationale for the punishment of Canaan and why, if Ham committed the crime, would his son Canaan suffer the penalty instead? Exegetical traditions have identified the deed for which Noah curses Ca­ naan either as voyeurism, castration, or homosexual paternal incest.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Apocalyptic Kingdom of God in Second Temple Jewish Literature and the Teachings of Jesus in Matthew
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE APOCALYPTIC KINGDOM OF GOD IN SECOND TEMPLE JEWISH LITERATURE AND THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS IN MATTHEW A THESIS SUBMITTED TO DR. C. FRED SMITH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE THESIS DEFENSE THEO 690 BY JEREMIAH STALLMAN MAY 8, 2013 ii THESIS APPROVAL SHEET _____________ GRADE ____________________________________________ THESIS CHAIR- DR. C. FRED SMITH ____________________________________________ READER- DR. GAYLEN LEVERETT iii ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE APOCALYPTIC KINGDOM OF GOD IN SECOND TEMPLE JEWISH LITERATURE AND THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS IN MATTHEW Jeremiah Stallman Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2013 Chair: C. Fred Smith The apocalyptic kingdom of God is a common theme in Second Temple Jewish literature. This kingdom is often presented differently in the various literary works of this era. This first chapter of this thesis considers the various aspects of the kingdom in relation to God’s coming judgment and the coming messiah who is often seen as the one bringing judgment and setting up the kingdom of God. The second chapter elaborates upon Jesus’ teachings about the apocalyptic kingdom of God and compares and contrasts them with the teachings of the kingdom in His day as understood through the Second Temple Jewish literature. Abstract Length: 102 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE KINGDOM OF
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D
    Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs by Daniel D. Stuhlman BHL, BA, MS LS, MHL In support of the Doctor of Hebrew Literature degree Jewish University of America Skokie, IL 2004 Page 1 Abstract Hebrew Names and Name Authority in Library Catalogs By Daniel D. Stuhlman, BA, BHL, MS LS, MHL Because of the differences in alphabets, entering Hebrew names and words in English works has always been a challenge. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is the source for many names both in American, Jewish and European society. This work examines given names, starting with theophoric names in the Bible, then continues with other names from the Bible and contemporary sources. The list of theophoric names is comprehensive. The other names are chosen from library catalogs and the personal records of the author. Hebrew names present challenges because of the variety of pronunciations. The same name is transliterated differently for a writer in Yiddish and Hebrew, but Yiddish names are not covered in this document. Family names are included only as they relate to the study of given names. One chapter deals with why Jacob and Joseph start with “J.” Transliteration tables from many sources are included for comparison purposes. Because parents may give any name they desire, there can be no absolute rules for using Hebrew names in English (or Latin character) library catalogs. When the cataloger can not find the Latin letter version of a name that the author prefers, the cataloger uses the rules for systematic Romanization. Through the use of rules and the understanding of the history of orthography, a library research can find the materials needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Idol Threats Cornerstone Connections
    real.solid.stories CORNERSTONECONNECTIONS FEBRUARYFEBRUARY06062016 Scripture Story: 1 Kings 11:14-43; 12:1-24; 2 Chronicles 9:29–12:16. Commentary: Prophets and Kings (or Royalty in Ruins), chapter 6. idol threats cornerstone connections 25 keytext Photo by Bill Wolf “After sheRehoboam’s had given positionhim a drink, as flashlight kingshe said,was established‘I’ll draw water and forhe yourhad camels too, until they have fin- “The twelve tribes of Israel were divided, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin composing the become strong, he and all Israel ished drinking’” lower or southern kingdom of Judah, under the rulership of Rehoboam; while the ten north- with him abandoned the law of the ern tribes formed and maintained a separate government, known as the kingdom of Israel, (Genesis 24:19, NIV). with Jeroboam as their ruler. Thus was fulfilled the prediction of the prophet concerning Lord.” the rending of the kingdom. ‘The cause was from the Lord’” (Prophets and Kings, p. 91). (2 Chronicles 12:1, NIV) “But as time passed, the king put his trust in the power of position and in the strongholds he had fortified. Little by little he gave way to inherited weakness, until he threw his influence wholly on the side of idolatry” (Prophets and Kings, p. 93). www.cornerstoneconnections.net heavy; I will make it even heavier. My father scourged you with whips; I will what scourge you with scorpions.’” do you think? “So all the Israelites went home. But as Rank the following items below in order of importance to the for the Israelites who were living in the average teenager (1 is most important, 10 is least important).
    [Show full text]
  • Placing and Displacing the Dead in the Book of Kings
    Placing and Displacing the Dead in the Book of Kings Francesca Stavrakopoulou University of Exeter Society of Biblical Literature San Diego, November 2007 Graves function as much for the living as they do for the dead. For the dead, graves might be understood as an unchanging, perpetual and specialised place of dwelling, or a transformative space in which one might enter into a new form of existence. 1 For the living, graves serve not only to hold the remains of the deceased, or to memorialise the existence of an individual but—significantly—a grave or collection of graves might also serve to mark the boundary of a given place or to signal possession or ownership of a territory.2 The interrelation of graves and boundaries is closely tied to the veneration of ancestors. Within ancient Near Eastern ancestor cults, perceptions of the continued existence of the dead were bound up with the family household; simply put, death did not break these domestic relationships, it merely altered the nature of family members’ interaction with one another. The ancestors played an important dual role within the lives of their descendants: they bore some responsibility for the fertility and perpetuation of the family line, and they acted as guardians and guarantors of hereditary property and places, including the land upon which most Near Eastern families lived, worked, died and were buried. 3 Ancestral tombs thus functioned as physical markers of the continued existence and permanent presence of the dead. 1 For anthropological discussions of death and burial, see, for example, P. Metcalf and R.
    [Show full text]
  • PLACE and TIME a Divided Kingdom
    joshua Hartwigsen, Wednesday adult class #6, Fall quarter, 2019.10.20, fellowship hall PLACE AND TIME A divided kingdom Summary of the story Israel, under the leadership of David and Solomon, reached it heights of power, influence and wealth (cf. 1 Kings 10:1-25), seemingly realizing its place as God’s “treasured possession” whom He promised to “set high above all nations which He has made, for praise, fame, and honor” (Deuteronomy 26:18-19). But God’s promises to bless the nation inseparably connected to its obedience (Deuteronomy 7:7- 10; 26:16-19), which the Bible’s record of Israel in 1 Samuel through 2 Chronicles measures through the behavior of its kings. The condition God placed on the blessings He gave to Israel prepares us for the nation’s sudden reversal of fortunes that followed Solomon’s apostasy - because of his sins, God divided the nation into two smaller nations (1 Kings 11:1-13), leaving only one tribe to the davidic line of kings (1 Kings 11:13) while promising the remaining tribes to Jeroboam (1 Kings 11:26-38). Selfish interests in power, wealth and influence combined with concerns over who would be the inheritor of God’s promises to create deep tensions between the newly formed northern joshua Hartwigsen, Wednesday adult class #6, Fall quarter, 2019.10.20, fellowship hall kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah (cf. 1 Kings 12:25-28; 14:30; 15:6; 2 Chronicles 11:1-12). The two nations, for example, battled over the border between their lands for about twenty years.
    [Show full text]