DOCSLIB.ORG

Vascular Plant Inventory for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Public Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vascular Plant Inventory for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Public Version National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vascular Plant Inventory for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Public Version Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/LEWI/NRTR—2012/603.N ON THE COVER Headland at Cape Disappointment Photograph by: Lindsey Koepke Wise Vascular Plant Inventory for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park Public Version Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/LEWI/NRTR—2012/603.N Lindsey Koepke Wise Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources / INR Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 Jimmy Kagan Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources / INR Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 July 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from the Lewis and Clark National Historical Park website (http://www.nps.gov/lewi/naturescience/plants.htm), the North Coast and Cascades Network Inventory and Monitoring website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/nccn/reportpubs.cfm), and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm). Please cite this publication as: Wise, L. K., and J. Kagan. 2012. Vascular plant inventory for Lewis and Clark National Historical Park: Public version. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/LEWI/NRTR— 2012/603.N. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 405/115905, July 2012 ii Contents Page Figures........................................................................................................................................... vii Tables ............................................................................................................................................. ix Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... xi Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ xiii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ xiv 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and justification ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Study area .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 History and setting .................................................................................................. 2 1.3.2 Geology and Climate .............................................................................................. 5 1.3.3 Vegetation ............................................................................................................... 5 1.3.4 Previous botanical studies ...................................................................................... 8 2 Methods........................................................................................................................................ 9 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Summary of the flora of Lewis and Clark National Historical Park ......................... 11 3.2 Lifeform and biogeographical diversity .................................................................... 11 3.3 Plant communities of special concern ....................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Carex macrocephala Herbaceous Vegetation ...................................................... 14 3.3.2 Picea sitchensis/Carex obnupta – Lysichiton americanus Forest ........................ 14 3.3.3 Festuca rubra Coastal Headland.......................................................................... 15 3.3.4 Calamagrostis nutkaensis – Elymus glaucus Perennial Grassland ..................... 16 3.3.5 Carex lyngbyei – Argentina egedii Herbaceous Vegetation ................................. 17 iii Contents (continued) Page 3.3.6 Salicornia virginica Herbaceous Vegetation ........................................................ 17 3.4 Rare or sensitive plant species ................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Baccharis pilularis – coyotebrush ........................................................................ 19 3.4.2 Callitriche hermaphroditica – autumnal water starwort...................................... 19 3.4.3 Carex brevicaulis – short-stemmed sedge ............................................................ 19 3.4.4 Carex macrocephala – big-headed sedge ............................................................. 19 3.4.5 Hydrocotyle ranunculoides – floating marsh-pennywort ..................................... 21 3.4.6 Lilaea scilloides – flowering quillwort ................................................................. 21 3.4.7 Poa unilateralis – ocean-bluff bluegrass .............................................................. 21 3.4.8 Samolus valerandi ssp. parviflorus – water-pimpernel ........................................ 21 3.4.9 Sidalcea hendersonii – Henderson’s sidalcea ...................................................... 21 3.4.10 Viola adunca – early blue violet ....................................................................... 21 3.5 Non-native species ........................................................................................................... 22 3.5.1 Cirsium arvense – Canada thistle ......................................................................... 24 3.5.2 Daphne laureola – spurge laurel .......................................................................... 24 3.5.3 Geranium lucidum – shining geranium ................................................................ 25 3.5.4 Geranium robertianum – herb robert ................................................................... 25 3.5.5 Hedera helix – English ivy .................................................................................... 25 3.5.6 Ilex aquifolium – English holly ............................................................................. 25 3.5.7 Iris pseudacorus – yellow flag iris ........................................................................ 25 3.5.8 Lathyrus latifolius – everlasting peavine .............................................................. 26 3.5.9 Lonicera periclymenum – European honeysuckle ................................................ 26 3.5.10 Lythrum salicaria – purple loosestrife .............................................................. 26 iv Contents (continued) Page 3.5.11 Myriophyllum aquaticum – parrot feather watermilfoil ................................... 27 3.5.12 Nymphaea odorata – American white waterlily ............................................... 27 3.5.13 Phragmites australis – common reed ............................................................... 27 3.5.14 Polygonum cuspidatum – Japanese knotweed .................................................. 28 3.5.15 Ranunculus ficaria – fig buttercup ................................................................... 28 3.5.16 Sorbus aucuparia – European mountain ash.................................................... 28 3.5.17 Ulex europaeus – gorse .................................................................................... 28 3.5.18 Other non-native plants of interest ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6 – Biological Resources 6 - 1 Draft EIR Mill Creek Project June 2018 and Features Adjacent Woodlands
    Draft EIR Mill Creek Project June 2018 6 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6.1 INTRODUCTION The Biological Resources chapter of the EIR evaluates the biological resources known to occur or potentially occur within the Mill Creek Project (proposed project) site, as well as biological resources known to occur in off-site areas where off-site project work may occur. This chapter describes potential impacts to those resources, and identifies measures to reduce those impacts to less-than-significant levels. Existing plant communities, wetlands, wildlife habitats, and potential for special-status species and communities are discussed for the project area. The information contained in this analysis is primarily based on the Biological Resources Assessment1 and the Special-Status Plant Survey Report2 prepared by Madrone Ecological Consulting, LLC (Madrone). Information concerning existing on-site trees was provided by the Arborist Reports prepared by Abacus Consulting Arborists. Further information was sourced from the Placer County General Plan,3 the Placer County General Plan EIR,4 and the Dry Creek-West Placer Community Plan (DCWPCP).5 6.2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following sections describe the existing environmental setting related to biological resources occurring in the proposed project area. Regional Setting The proposed project site is located north of Antelope and southwest of the City of Roseville, in an unincorporated portion of western Placer County, within the DCWPCP. The DCWPCP experiences a Mediterranean type climate with cool, wet winters, and hot, dry summers. Temperatures in the project area fluctuate from average highs in July of 95 degrees Fahrenheit, with average lows in December and January, averaging 39 degrees Fahrenheit for both months.
    [Show full text]
  • WRITTEN FINDINGS of the WASHINGTON STATE NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD 2018 Noxious Weed List Proposal
    DRAFT: WRITTEN FINDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD 2018 Noxious Weed List Proposal Scientific Name: Tussilago farfara L. Synonyms: Cineraria farfara Bernh., Farfara radiata Gilib., Tussilago alpestris Hegetschw., Tussilago umbertina Borbás Common Name: European coltsfoot, coltsfoot, bullsfoot, coughwort, butterbur, horsehoof, foalswort, fieldhove, English tobacco, hallfoot Family: Asteraceae Legal Status: Proposed as a Class B noxious weed for 2018, to be designated for control throughout Washington, except for in Grant, Lincoln, Adams, Benton, and Franklin counties. Images: left, blooming flowerheads of Tussilago farfara, image by Caleb Slemmons, National Ecological Observatory Network, Bugwood.org; center, leaves of T. farfara growing with ferns, grasses and other groundcover species; right, mature seedheads of T. farfara before seeds have been dispersed, center and right images by Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org. Description and Variation: The common name of Tussilago farfara, coltsfoot, refers to the outline of the basal leaf being that of a colt’s footprint. Overall habit: Tussilago farfara is a rhizomatous perennial, growing up to 19.7 inches (50 cm tall), which can form extensive colonies. Plants first send up flowering stems in the spring, each with a single yellow flowerhead. Just before or after flowers have formed seeds, basal leaves on long petioles grow from the rhizomes, with somewhat roundish leaf blades that are more or less white-woolly on the undersides. Roots: Plants have long creeping, white scaly rhizomes (Griffiths 1994, Chen and Nordenstam 2011). Rhizomes are branching and have fibrous roots (Barkley 2006). They are also brittle and can break easily (Pfeiffer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcomb 1981-12.Pdf
    POPULAR ANNUALS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA, 1865 - 1914 -.- I P -i 3Y Peggy Cornett Newcomb A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University f Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for he Longwood Program for the degree of Master of Sci,once in rnamental Horticulture. December, 1981 I. d Copyright Peggy Cornett Newcomb 1981 I wish to express sincere thanks to the Longwood Program for the opportunity to do this study. I am deeply indebted to those who served on my thesis committee and made substantial improvements upon my initial drafts. Dr. Richard W. Lighty helped me focus my ideas and raise my aspirations, Mr. Harold Bruce used his editorial talents to salvage many ragged sentences, and Ms. Julia F. Davis provided invaluable scholarly advice and much needed en- couragement. I acknowledge all the institutions which I visited during the past two years and spent many enjoyable hours exploring their rare book and catalogue collections. To Ms. Dolores Altemus and Mr. Stuart Dick, University of Delaware Library; Ms. Enola Teeter, Longwood Gardens Library; Ms. Mary Lou Wolf, Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Library; and Ms. Elisabeth Woodburn, Booknoll Farm I extend a special thanks for their generous assistance. Lastly, without the genuine assurances of my friends and my husband, Rob Newcomb, I would never have carried this thesis to its completion. For their constant companionship I am truly grateful. iii I, TABLE OF CONTENTS QCKNOWLEDGMENTS.. ................. iii OF CONTENTS .................. iV BSTRaCT ...................... vi PINTRODUCTION .................... 1 Chapter I. AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGE: SORE MAJOR INFLUENCES UPON THE DEVELOPNIENT OF HORTICULTURE AND TKE SEED INDUSTRY .....
    [Show full text]
  • North American Flora Volume 17
    VO LUM E 1 7 PART 7 NO RTH AMERICAN FLO RA (P OALE S) PO ACEAE (pars) 1 ALB ERT SPEAR Hn‘ cncocx sc i i n P ice Sub r pt o r , e ar a e C ies S p t op , PUBLI SHE D BY . THE N E W YORK BOTAN I CAL GAR DEN H 3 1 1 93 M ARC , 7 (btRLHfl! A RT 7 1 93 7 AC A P , ] PO E E Coll a r glabrou s (throa t of she a th more or ss s a u su a s le pilo e) ; p nicle lly ex erted , 7 n e . n s 3 S . do m s i . a s . n rrow , conden ed i g a s s a t as a t s s Coll r den ely pilo e . le t the ide ; p anicle u su a lly inclu ded a t bas e (sometimes entirely inclu ded) . — u s bu s 1 2 s a s C lm ro t , meter t ll ; pike — nl en 8 . a . 3 . S i s let s 3 mm . long . g g u s s s s s a C lm more lender , mo tly le th n s 2 1 meter ta ll ; s pikelet mm . long . a a P nicle open , often l rge , the bra nches a nd bra nchlet s fle xu o us s s s ar , the pikelet loo ely 9 . exuo us . 3 . S s ra nged . fl a a P nicle open or comp ct , if open , the spikelets crowded on the t branchle s .
    [Show full text]
  • Inferences Based on ITS Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses
    Korean J. Pl. Taxon. (2011) Vol. 41 No. 3, pp.209-214 The taxonomic status of Angelica purpuraefolia and its allies in Korea : Inferences based on ITS molecular phylogenetic analyses Byoung Yoon Lee1,2*, Myounghai Kwak1, Jeong Eun Han1,3 and Se-Jung Kim1,4 1Wildlife Genetic Resources Center, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 404-170, Korea 2Division of Microorganism, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 404-170, Korea 3Department of Biology, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea 4Genome analyses center, National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul 151-921, Korea (Received 29 August 2011; Revised 08 September 2011; Accepted 13 September 2011) ABSTRACT: The taxonomy of the umbelliferous species Angelica amurensis and its allies was reviewed on the basis of molecular phylogenies derived from sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Strict consensus of six minimal length 119-step trees derived from equally weighted maximum parsimony analysis of combined nuclear rDNA ITS1 and ITS2 sequences from 29 accessions of Angelica and outgroups indicated that Angelica purpuraefolia, known to be endemic to Korea, is the same species as A. amurensis. Comparisons of sequence pairs across both spacer regions revealed identity or 1-2 bp differences between A. purpuraefolia and A. amurensis. These results indicated that the two taxa are not distinguished taxonomically. Also, nuclear rDNA ITS regions are discussed as potential barcoding loci for identifying Korean Angelica. Keywords: Apiaceae, Angelica purpuraefolia, Angelica amurensis, DNA barcode The Korean endemic Angelica purpuraefolia Chung grows bioactivities have been protected by Korean patent law (Lee in mountainous areas in Gangwondo, Gyeongsangbugdo, and et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Notas Sobre El Género Ambrosia (Asteraceae: Ambrosiinae) En Chile Notes on the Genus Ambrosia (Asteraceae: Ambrosiinae) in Chile
    Chloris Chilensis 23 (1): 77-83. 2020. NOTAS SOBRE EL GÉNERO AMBROSIA (ASTERACEAE: AMBROSIINAE) EN CHILE NOTES ON THE GENUS AMBROSIA (ASTERACEAE: AMBROSIINAE) IN CHILE Federico Luebert & Nicolás García Herbario EIF, Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile E-mail: [email protected] RESUMEN Se discuten aspectos nomenclaturales y taxonómicos de tres especies de Ambrosia de Chile. Se concluye que el nombre Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. debe ser usado en lugar de A. elatior L.; el nombre A. cumanensis Kunth, en lugar de A. peruviana Willd.; y que el nombre A. tarapacana Phil., debe agregarse al catálogo de la flora de Chile hasta que nuevos estudios se hagan disponibles. El género, así considerado, queda representado en el país por siete especies. Se proporciona una clave para la determinación de las especies de Ambrosia presentes en Chile. Palabras clave: Compositae, nomenclatura, taxonomía. ABSTRACT Nomenclatural and taxonomic aspects of three Ambrosia species present in Chile are discussed. We conclude that the name Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. should be used instead of A. elatior L., the name A. cumanensis Kunth instead of A. peruviana Willd., and the name A. tarapacana Phil. should be added to the catalogue of the Chilean flora until new studies become available. The genus is thus represented in Chile by seven species. A key for the determination of the Chilean species of Ambrosia is provided. Key words: Compositae, Nomenclature, Taxonomy. Luebert & García: Ambrosia en Chile. Chloris Chilensis 23 (1): 77-83. 2020. INTRODUCCIÓN El género Ambrosia L. (Asteraceae) fue creado por Linneo para incluir cuatro especies (Linnaeus, 1753).
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Abronia Umbellata Var. Breviflora)
    Pink sandverbena (Abronia umbellata var. breviflora) ENDANGERED Flowers (left), habit (center), and habitat (right) of pink sandverbena. Photos by ODA staff (left and center) and Thomas Kaye (right). If downloading images from this website, please credit the photographer. Family Nyctaginaceae Taxonomic notes Synonyms: Abronia umbellata ssp. breviflora, Abronia umbellata ssp. acutalata, Abronia umbellata var. acutalata, Abronia breviflora, Abronia acutalata The number of taxa included within the Abronia umbellata complex has varied with different treatments of the group. Based on genetic and morphometric studies of A. umbellata populations, we consider A. umbellata var. acutalata to be included within var. breviflora. Plant description Pink sandverbena can be either an annual or occasionally a short-lived perennial. It is a tap-rooted glandular-puberulent forb with few to several prostrate branches up to 1 m (-1.5) long. Leaf blades are fleshy, light green, oval to oblong-ovate with somewhat irregular margins, 2-6 cm long, with slender petioles about as long as the blades. Flowers are grouped in ball-like clusters of 8-20 (average 14-15) subtended by 5 (4) lanceolate involucral bracts, with clusters born at the ends of stalks growing out from the stems. Individual plants produce from one to thousands of flower clusters, depending on conditions. The perianth is glandular-puberulent, the perianth tube greenish or yellowish to pink and 0.6-0.8 cm long. The corolla limbs are pinkish-purple to deep reddish-magenta, 0.5-0.8 cm broad. Flowers have a yellowish-white eyespot 0.25-0.3 cm in diameter surrounding the throat.
    [Show full text]
  • Abronia Maritima Nutt. Ex S. Wats
    SPECIES Abronia maritima Nutt. ex S. Wats. Family: Nyctaginaceae; NRCS CODE: Gary A. Monroe @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database ABMA2 Order: Caryophyllales; Subclass: Caryophyllidae; Class: Magnoliopsida Subspecific taxa None. Synonyms None listed. Common name red sand verbena (CalFlora, USDA PLANTS), sticky sand verbena (CalFlora) Taxonomic relationships Abronia latifolia Eschsch. and A. umbellata Lam. are closely related species (Blancas 2001). Related taxa in region May co-occur with A. latifolia and A. umbellata where distributions overlap. All three occur between Point Arguello, Santa Barbara Co., to Morro Bay in San Luis Obispo Co. (Tilllett 1967). Other CNPS list 4.2, limited distribution. Endemic to California and Baja California. There has been concern that hybridization with the two more widespread, co-occurring species of Abronia together with rapid loss of its coastal dune habitat are making the plants vulnerable to extinction (Blancas 2001). Genetic and morphological studies by Blancas (2001) were consistent with there being a high rate of hybridization with A. umbellata within a few small populations. GENERAL Map Data provided by the participants of the Consortium of California Herbaria represent 114 records with coordinate data out of 324 total records retrieved; data accessed 9/23/10. See Berkeley Mapper: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/consortium Geographic range Sparsely located in central and southern California and Baja California (Hickman 1993). Distribution in California; South coast and south central coast (Hickman 1993) and Channel Islands. Ecological Sections Ecological section and subsection (http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/projects/ecoregions/ca_sections.htm): Central California Coast (261A), and Southern California Coast (261B). Life history, life form Perennial herb, rapidly growing, mat forming pioneer that keeps up with advancing sand dunes.
    [Show full text]