DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bantam Goose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bantam Goose THE BANTAM GOOSE By Jonathan M. Thompson, July 2010. The concept of producing a Bantam Goose was put to the public as early as 1877; contained in an article on the subject in The Poultry Yard & Market. Mr. Tom Bartlett of Folly Farm, Gloucestershire, when interviewed for Country Living Magazine in the late 1980’s, claimed that creating a Bantam goose had not been achieved, and he would like to create such a breed. Had he read Appleyard’s little book, Geese, he would have known his statement to be imprecise. Reginald Appleyard of the Priory Waterfowl Farm, Ixworth, Suffolk, appears to have first exhibited his Bantam Goose at the Dairy Show in 1932. In the Feathered World Year Book for 1933 Captain N. Milne Harrop contributes an article: ‘Geese in 1932’, and mentions this breed gaining a card at the Dairy Show:- The next class, that for A.O.V., numbered no less than 16 entries, and contained six different varieties. Mr. Appleyard penned a most interesting selection, . This exhibitor also showed . a very excellent attempt at an Embden Bantam, which also gained a Commended card. I understand this bird was not a freak but the result of many years careful breeding. It weighed about 6 lbs. In the same Year Book, Mr. J. P. Bleazard contributes an article ‘Waterfowl in 1932.’ and says:- One occasionally sees other breeds of Geese, . .We have this year seen another addition to the Goose section, namely, an Embden Bantam Goose and most charming it looked, and came in for much admiration by the general public at the Palace Show. a splendid entry, especially in the A. O. Variety, faced Mr. Fox Brockbank. Mr. Appleyard was among the minor awards with a lovely Sebastopol [Smooth-breasted, long-feathered type; Mr. Marler, please note!], and he also had Buff Geese, and an Embden Bantam Goose on view in this class. F.W. Year Book, 1934, presents an obviously composite photograph (Fig.1.) of Reginald Appleyard’s ‘White Bantam Goose, weight 6½ lbs, at 9 months’, and an English Grey Back Goose. Captain N. Milne Harrop reporting on ‘Geese in 1933’, refers to some of the less popular breeds and repeats what he wrote in the 1933 Year book, saying:- “ even an attempt at an Embden Bantam has been seen—this weighed about 6 lbs.” The goose classes at the Dairy Show, judged by Mr. R. Alty, included:- “ The A.O.V. class contained eight birds, all sent by Mr. R. Appleyard. All were different, . , Buff and White Bantam; commended. ” Fred Hams (Domestic Ducks and Geese, 2000) presents an image of a Bantam Goose with the following text: Reginald Appleyard’s White Bantam Goose. Advertised in his 1924 catalogue as being the ‘first ever shown’, it is likely that it was produced with a utility bird in mind. In the 1920’s several leading breeders were using small continental strains of Roman geese when trying to produce very small, early-maturing ‘broiler’ goslings that could be sold cheaply ‘off grass’. The writer has not located a brochure of this date, but suggests the date of 1924 may be imprecise ~ as no other reference, other than those given below, has been traced regarding the Bantam Goose being exhibited at a Show prior to 1932; and Appleyard first includes the White Bantam Goose in his advertisement in the Feathered World Year Book of 1934 ~ the image being the same as that used in every edition of his book, Geese (1933 – 1948), and that given by Fred Hams. By the end of the Second World War it appears the Bantam Goose became conveniently lost to fanciers’ memories and this allowed it to be born anew, as announced in a newspaper article of an unverified date and title:- A New Breed of goose, a bantam, on show beside a normal bird at the three-day National Poultry Show, which opened yesterday at Olympia. It was exhibited by Lt. Col. A. A. Johnson (RIGHT), of Ixworth, Suffolk. Our Agricultural Correspondent writes: The Bantam goose is developed from the mating of a wild goose onto a small Roman domestic goose. When prepared for the table it will come within the popular weight range for ducks and may help to bring goose back into popular esteem. Lt. Col. Johnson said the goose cost practically nothing to keep as it lived on grass and it required no housing. At the moment there were only 20 pairs in existence. The copy of the original article available to the writer has the right-hand portion of the picture torn away as neither of the gentlemen featured happen to be Col. Johnson. On the reverse of the original photograph (Fig.2.) is stated it was taken at the International Poultry Show at Olympia, 3.12.62:- PICTURE SHOWS: A new breed of small goose. The Bantam Goose owned by COL. A. A. JOHNSON of Isworth [sic], Suffolk (RIGHT) is compared xxxx for size with a normal size Embden Goose. The smaller goose, just right for the small-family meal may soon prove to be a big seller in British supermarkets. A similar article appears in the Canadian Poultry Review (1963) stating Lt. Col. Johnson had bred the Bantam Goose for the past six years. Fig.2. International Poultry Show, Olympia 1962. Photograph courtesy of W. Bird & T. Somerville. On his retirement from the army, Lt. Col. Johnson had taken over the Priory Waterfowl Farm from Reginald Appleyard, and did much to promote the keeping of waterfowl in post war Britain. Another photograph (Fig. 3.), also the property of Col. Johnson, shows “a pair of Bantam Geese and a pair of Toulouse Geese, myself in background.” The comparison is again useful in gauging the size of these birds. Fig.3. Toulouse & Bantam Geese at Ixworth, 1963/64 (?). Photograph courtesy of W. Bird & T. Somerville. Jean Delacour (Waterfowl of the World, 1964), however, says:- A very small white breed, first developed in Holland (Duizend) before 1940, then perfected by Jack Williams and Col. A. A. Johnson. The gosling is grey. It is used for the production of geese small enough for roasting in an ordinary sized oven. Fig.4. Toulouse & Bantam Geese at Ixworth, 1963/4 (?). Photograph courtesy of John Hall. Fig.5. John Hall’s Bantam Goose at Ixworth 1963/64 (?) Photograph courtesy of John Hall. These geese (Figs.4 &5.) arrived in Britain in the 1950’s from Holland, in a consignment of assorted wildfowl imported by Col. Johnson. John Hall (pers. comm.) recalls the original male being pale grey in colour; the pair produced both white offspring and one resembling the usual pattern of the White-fronted Goose (Fig.6). This type of goose was thought to be quite commonly found on the polders in Holland; possibly used as decoys. They were, most probably, either a cross between a domestic Roman-type Goose and the White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons); or even a mutation of the White-fronted Goose. This type of Bantam Goose is quite different to that produced by Appleyard. John Hall maintained birds of this strain during his time at Ixworth with Col. Johnson. Jack Williams of Dilham, Norfolk acquired stock from the Colonel and bred them pure white; but these continental geese died-out in Britain after Jack Williams dispersed his stock. Fig.6. Off-spring of White Bantam Geese (2nd from left) at Ixworth. Photograph courtesy of John Hall. Reginald Appleyard had long retired and passed away in the year of the Delacour publication; and Delacour had written his account from information provided by Appleyard’s successors, as they would then have it known. However, there can be no doubt that Reginald Appleyard was the first person to introduce a Bantam Goose and promote it to the public’s attention; those who came after him further developed and promoted the breed, but it never achieved a place in the British Standards to help in its continuance and is not in existence today ~ as far as is known! Acknowledgements. I wish to acknowledge the grateful assistance of Wendy Bird and Tessa Somerville ~ both daughters of the late Lt. Col. A. A. Johnson, also John Hall, for his recollections of the Bantam Geese; and for their kind permissions to reproduce some unique images here. My thanks also goes to the late Mrs Margaret Hundy ~ one of Reginald Appleyard’s daughters ~ for her assistance in all matters waterfowl and permission to reproduce images from her father’s collection. Copyright ©2010 Aviculture-Europe. All rights reserved by VBC. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Incubating Waterfowl Simplified Beginner’S Checklist Calvin E
    Incubating Waterfowl Simplified Beginner’s Checklist Calvin E. Roberts, Jr. • Roberts Farm • San Augustine, Texas 75972 As much as possible, encourage ducks and geese to lay in clean dry nests. Once they begin to lay in an ideal location, keep 4-5 fake, ceramic eggs in the nest to keep them laying there. Identify the time of day when eggs are laid and collect as soon as possible. The longer the eggs sit in a dirty nest, the greater the chances of bacterial contamination. Wash hands and use only a clean, sanitized containers for collection. Touching contaminated surfaces and then touching hatching eggs will transfer the contaminates to the eggs. When necessary, rinse and sanitize eggs coated in dirt/mud immediately after collection. Oxygen exchange and water loss is impaired in coated eggs leading to early death or weakened hatchlings. Store eggs in a clean, closed container in a cool, humid location. Waterfowl eggs do not store as well as chicken eggs and should be set within 7 days of collection. Turning eggs in storage is optional. Prewarm cool eggs to room temperature prior to setting to avoid condensation (water drops) on egg shells and to assist in bringing the incubator up to temperature in a timely manner. Calibrate a separate thermometer and hygrometer to verify incubator readings. Measure temperature at mid-egg level. Never trust the incubator gauges until they have proven accurate. Set incubation temperature at 99.5-99.8°F (37.5-37.7°C). Check for warm and cool spots within the incubator and rotate eggs daily as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Extension 1984 G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock Earl W. Gleaves University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Gleaves, Earl W., "G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock" (1984). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. 1281. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/1281 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Extension at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. G84-711-A Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock This NebGuide provides basic information on breed selection, sexing, housing and equipment needed, feeding, breeding, egg care and incubation for the home goose flock. Earl W. Gleaves, Extension Poultry Specialist z Breed Selection z Sexing z Housing and Equipment z Feeding z Breeding z Egg Care z Incubation The goose has been almost completely ignored in the rapid technical developments that have occurred in other parts of the poultry industry in the past 25 years. Experimental work with the domestic goose has been very limited. This means that management recommendations that are pertinent today may not be in the future. Geese total less than 1 percent of the U.S. poultry population. They have the disadvantage of being low egg producers, which causes the cost of day-old goslings to be high.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Canada Geese in Urban Environments a Technical Guide Arthur E
    Managing Canada Geese in Urban Environments A Technical Guide Arthur E. Smith, Scott R. Craven, and Paul D. Curtis A publication of Cornell Cooperative Extension, the University of Wisconsin, The Jack H. Berryman Institute, Utah State University, and The Wildlife Society, Wildlife Damage Management Working Group Arthur E. Smith is a research intern and Scott R. Craven is an extension wildlife specialist with the Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Paul D. Curtis is an extension wildlife specialist in the Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University. Acknowledgments We especially want to thank M. R. Conover and the Jack H. Berryman Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, for reviews and support in producing this manual. The Wildlife Society–Wildlife Damage Management Working Group’s Urban/Suburban Canada Goose Task Force Committee also provided review and support for this manuscript. We also thank S. Beckerman, H. Blokpoel, E. C. Cleary, R. A. Dolbeer, M. E. Eckstrom, G. Haas, R. S. Lutz, P. J. Rodrick, K. Solberg, W. E. Wheeler, P. C. Whitford, members of the Mississippi Flyway Council Technical Section Giant Canada Goose Committee, especially G. Zenner and J. Bergquist. This publication should be cited as Smith, A. E., S. R. Craven, and P. D. Curtis. 1999. Managing Canada geese in urban environments. Jack Berryman Institute Publication 16, and Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, N.Y. Additional copies of this publication may be purchased from Cornell University, Media and Technology Services Resource Center, 7 Cornell Business & Technology Park, Ithaca, NY 14850. Phone: 607-255-2080. Fax: 607-255-9946. E-mail: [email protected] A free catalog of Cornell Cooperative Extension publications and audiovisuals is available from the same address, or from any Cornell Cooperative Extension office.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Medicine (Avian Science, Technology and Practice) [Samad MA (2013)
    LEP Publication No. 13 Avian Medicine (Avian Science, Technology and Practice) [Samad MA (2013). Avian Medicine] 1st Published as: Poultry Science and Medicine: February 2005 2nd Edition as: Avian Medicine: January 2013 ISSN 984-8094-01-1 Language: English Published by: M. Bulbul, Mymensingh, Bangladesh Printed at: Bikash Mudran, 56/5, Fakirepool Bazar, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Total pages (9.5 x 7): 1374 Price BDT: 950.0 / copy and US $ 20.0 / copy Stock: Available with limited stock 1 Avian Medicine [2nd Edition: January 2013] PREFACE Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem I’m pleased to present the 2nd edition of ‘Avian Medicine’ about seven years since the first ‘Poultry Science and Medicine’ was published in 2005. For this edition, significant changes were needed to keep up-to-date with the increasingly rapid expansion of knowledge about the Avian science, technology and practices. The main role of Poultry Vets is to minimize the cost of poultry production and ensure that its products are safe for human consumption. Veterinarians have a major responsibility to ensure that the meat and eggs produced by the poultry under their care are free from pathogens, chemicals, anti-microbial and other drugs that may be harmful to humans. The Veterinary Medical students and Avian Vets must become knowledge about various aspects of birds, especially disease and management associated with impaired production. Such Avian Vets will become specialists who can provide totally integrated avian health and management advice either to the poultry, pet, zoo or wild birds. To be able to do this Avian Vets will need to understand courses on ‘Avian Medicine’ and develop the expertise on their own by diligent self-education in Avian Vet practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Patterns of Two Chinese Native Goose Breeds
    Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola ISSN 1516-635X Apr - Jun 2017 / v.19 / n.2 / 203-210 Growth Patterns of Two Chinese Native Goose Breeds http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0395 Author(s) ABSTracT Ibtisham FI To study the development rules of Chinese native geese, two breeds, An LI Shitou and Sichuan White geese were analyzed from 0 to 12 weeks of Li TI Niu YI age. The growth curves were fitted with commonly used four kinds of Xiao MI nonlinear models (Logistic, Gompertz, Von Bertalanffy and Richards). Zhang LI Jia RI The results showed that the growth curves were appropriately fitted with all four models but the Logistic and Richards both had the best fitting with growth curve (R2>0.99). Analyzing the fitting parameters of I Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, P.R. China the Logistic and Richards, we found that male Shitou had the highest adult body weight while Sichuan White female had the lowest weight. In Shitou breed, Shape parameter Predicted with Richards model was corresponded with Gompertz curve, while in Sichuan breed it was in between Gompertz and Bertalanffy. Growth parameters predicted with Logistic model was much more closed to observed value as compared others. So overall logistic was the best model to analyze the growth curve in Chinese native goose and Shitou goose had excellent growth performance when compared to Sichuan White. INTRODUCTION Goose is one of the most important economic poultry around the Mail Address world because of the growing demand of the human population.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Gardens, Copenhagen) (With 1 Plate) (Ree
    MORPHOLOGICAL AND ETHOLOGICAL NOTES ON A HYBRID BETWEEN A DOMESTIC DUCK AND A DOMESTIC GOOSE by HOLGER POULSEN (Zoological Gardens, Copenhagen) (With 1 plate) (Ree. 22-V-1950) Although interspecific crosses, especially those between species of dif- ferent genera, are rare in nature, interbreeding is much commoner in captivity . The Copenhagen Zoological Gardens possess two hybrids between Branta canadensis L. and An.ser albifrons gambelli Hartl., which were captured 1944 in Sarquaq in West Greenland. These birds, incidentally, were the only existing proof of the breeding of the Canada Goose in Greenland (Verbal information from Dr F. SALOMONSEN). When species which are not known to interbreed in nature do so in captivi- ty, we are usually concerned with individuals which have been kept in isolation from their own species. Under these conditions the reproductive drive may become extremely strong, so that the threshold for stimuli releasing repro- ductive, especially sexual, behaviour is considerably lowered. In such cases individuals of other species may be accepted as partners although they offer stimuli which would normally be inadequate to release sexual reactions. The sexual drive may even become so strong that sexual behaviour occurs in vacuo. Until recently, interest in problems of interbreeding was focussed mainly upon the question of what species would hybridise, and upon the morpho- logical features and fertility of the hybrids. During the last few years, however, hybrids have received attention from behaviour students. In com- parative ethology it is important to know the behaviour of hybrids, and to compare it with that of the parent species. The behaviour of a hybrid is not always intermediate between that of its parents, but may show more pri- mitive traits (LoRErrz, 1941, p.
    [Show full text]
  • 102.Domestication
    History of Poultry Origin and Domestication 1. Chicken Different archaeological surveys indicate that chickens were originated from the Red Jungle fowl (Gallus gallus ) in the Indus valley about 200 B.C. and believe that it may be the chief ancestor of modern chicken. But it is also believed that another three wild species of chicken have been contributed to develop modern chicken which found in South East Asia. India and throughout mainland of Southeast Asia to the off-shore island of Indonesia are the ancestral home of the present day domestic fowl. The four species are closely related and are known to interbreed. The species are- 01. the Red Jungle fowl (Gallus gallus ) 02. the Grey Jungle fowl (Gallus sonnerati) 03. the Ceylon Jungle fowl (Gallus lafayetti) 04. the Black/Green/ Java Jungle fowl (Gallus varius). Our ancient history bears witness to the fact that the people of India were quite familiar with chicken, duck, quail and turkey, about 3200 years B.C. Quail or cock fight provided as a source of fun. Domesticated fowls could certainly be found in Iran by 800 B.C. and the Persians spread them throughout Western Asia and to the shores of the Mediterranean by 600 B.C. They were introduced in Italy by 400 B. C. northern Europe by 100 B.C. Chicken was imported into the America and Australia by the early European explorers and immigrants. To-day they are considered as vital source of animal protein throughout the world. 2. Duck The wild duck was first domesticated in Asia also. The modern improved duck breeds or varieties are derived from the wild stock.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSERIFORMES Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 3Rd Edition • 2020 - 2025
    ANSERIFORMES Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 3rd Edition • 2020 - 2025 Edited by Photo by Pinola Conservancy Keith Lovett, Anseriformes TAG Chair Buttonwood Park Zoo Table of Contents Acknowledgements 03 TAG Operational Structure 04 TAG Steering Committee and Advisors: Table 1 05 TAG Definition 06 TAG Mission 06 TAG Vision 06 TAG Strategic Planning Overview 07 TAG Goals Sustainability 08 Conservation 09 Husbandry and Welfare 09 Educational Waterfowl Awareness and Program Support 10 TAG Taxonomy 11 TAG Taxonomy: Table 2 12 Conservation Status of Anseriformes Overview 13 Conservation Status of Anseriformes: Table 3 14 RCP History and Program Designation Program Management Designation 20 Additional Management Designation 21 Selection Criteria Selection Criteria Overview 22 Decision Tree Selection Criteria Categories 23 Proposed EAZA Waterfowl TAG European Endangered 24 Species Program (EEP) Species Anseriformes Decision Tree: Table 4 25 Anseriformes TAG Selection Criteria / Decision Tree: Table 5 26 Anseriformes TAG Selection Criteria / Decision Tree Summary 33 Space Assessment Space Assessment Overview 34 Space Survey Accountability:Responding Insititutions: Table 6 35 Space Survey Accountability: Non-responding Insititutions: Table 7 37 Space Survey Results and Target Size: Table 8 38 Regional Anseriformes Populations: Table 9 39 Summary Table 46 Non-Recommended Species Replacement Overview 47 Non-Recommended Species Replacement Chart: Table 11 48 Management Update: Table 12 51 SSP Five Year Goals and Essential Actions 53
    [Show full text]
  • DOMESTIC SPECIES LIST August 2010 Animal Group Order Family Genus Species Common Name(S) Comments
    Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department page 1 of 3 Wild Bird and Animal Importation and Possession DOMESTIC SPECIES LIST August 2010 Animal Group Order Family Genus Species Common Name(s) Comments Mammals* Artiodactyla Bovidae Bison bison American bison Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos indicus Zebu Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos grunniens Domestic yak Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos taurus Domestic cow Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bubalis bubalis Domestic water buffalo Including breeds and varrieties derived from the wild Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Capra hircus Domestic goat goat or bezoar (Capra aegagrus ). Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Ovis aries Domestic sheep Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Camelus dromedarius Dromedary Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Lama glama Llama Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Lama pacos Alpaca Mammals Artiodactyla Cervidae Cervus elaphus European Red Deer Mammals Artiodactyla Cervidae Dama dama Fallow deer Including breeds and varieties derived from the wild boar (Sus scrofa ) but not including free-living or feral Mammals Artiodactyla Suidae Sus domesticus Domestic swine wild boars or wild swine. Mammals Carnivora Canidae Canis familiaris Domestic dog Mammals Carnivora Felidae Felis catus Domestic cat Mammals Carnivora Mustelidae Mustela putorious furo European ferret Including breeds, varieties, and strains derived from the European rabbit but not including the Eurpoean rabbit ferae naturae and not including the so-called Mammals Lagomorpha Leporidae Oryctolagus cuniculus Domestic rabbit "San Juan" rabbit. Mammals Perissodactyla Equidae Equus asinus Domestic ass Mammals Perissodactyla Equidae Equus caballus Domestic horse Birds* Anseriformes Anatidae Alopochen aegyptiaca Domestic goose Derived from the Egyptian goose Derived from the Mallard (Anas platyrhinos ), including, but not restricted to, Aylesbury duck, Blue Swedish duck, Buff duck, Cayuga duck, Crested White duck, English call duck, Indian runner duck, Pekin duck, and Birds Anseriformes Anatidae Anas platyrhynchos Domestic duck Roen duck.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION of NATIVE SLOVAK CHICKEN and GOOSE: a Review
    The 5th International Scientific Conference “Animal Biotechnology” Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 50, 2017 (4): 144–148 © 2017 NPPC ISSN 1337-9984 CHARACTERIZATION OF NATIVE SLOVAK CHICKEN AND GOOSE: A REVIEW E. HANUSOVÁ1*, C. HRNČÁR2, A. HANUS1, Ľ. ONDRUŠKA1 1NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Slovak Republic 2Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovak Republic ABSTRACT Nowadays, there are four local poultry breeds originating from different parts of Slovakia. At present time, there are registered low numbers of native breeds of poultry on the territory of Slovakia. In the last century, four poultry breeds were created - chickens (Oravka, Bantam Oravka) and goose (Suchovska goose and Slovak goose). In this article we collected and analyzed the data about the origin, breed characteristics and population size of native poultry breeds. Key words: chicken; goose; Oravka breed; Slovak goose; Suchovska goose INTRODUCTION in domestic poultry breeds. In the last century four poultry breeds were bred in Slovakia – Oravka and The current economic situation causes an interest Bantam Oravka chickens, Suchovska goose and Slovak in specialized poultry lines in advanced countries goose. in the world, focusing on egg-laying or meat-based performance. Due to the very intense breeding, many genes are lost and they may be missing in future. CHICKEN Therefore, the reasons for keeping poultry genetic resources are the same as for all species of farm animals. The domestic chicken is descended primarily Characteristics of poultry genetic resources include from the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and is the collection of population size data, its structure scientifically classified as the same species.
    [Show full text]
  • Being a Practical Treatise on the Management of Domestic Poultry
    m THE AMERICAN T JPj)ULTRY BOOK; BEING A PRACTICAL TREATISE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF DOMESTIC POULTRY. BY MICAJAH H. COCK. "A very considerable part o' all the property of *>\ery nation consists " of its domesticated animals WM. COOPER, Ann. Discourse. NEW YORK: HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE. 1861. Entered, according to Act of in the Congress, year 1843, by HARPER & BROTHERS, In the Clerk's Office of the Southern District of New York. THE Board of Agriculture of the American Insti- " tute have, by a Committee, examined The Ameri- can Poultry Book, a practical Treatise on the Man- agement of Domestic Poultry," and are happy to assure the agricultural community in New-York and the United States, that this valuable work ex- actly supplies a deficiency which has long been felt in this department of the Agricultural Library. They have no doubt that it will soon find its place in every farmhouse, and wherever a taste exists for rural habits. The above recommendation was unanimously awarded at the meeting of the Board, May 18th, 1843. Signed, on behalf of the Board : NICHOLAS WYCKOFF, Vice-president. JNO. O. CHOULES, Secretary. INDEX. Page Age of Fowls 27 Eggs, Composition of . 73 Age of Geese 153 Eggs, Shape of .... 75 Age of Ducks 148 Eggs, Size of ..... 76 Amputation of Wing . 134 Eggs, Number of ... 79 Animal Food 114 Eggs, Preservation of . 86 Artificial Eggs .... 63 Every-day Hen .... 30 Artificial Incubation . 96 Fasciola Tracheae . .127 Artificial Food . .110 Fattening Coops . .112 Ashes 54 Fattening Chickens . .111 32 Bantam Breed .... Fattening Ducks .
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into the Welfare of Ducks and Geese Kept for the Production of Foie Gras
    Forced feeding An inquiry into the welfare of ducks and geese kept for the production of foie gras Produced by Advocates for Animals and World Society for the Protection of Animals Forced feeding CIWF An inquiry into the welfare of ducks and geese kept for the production of foie gras by Carol McKenna, Animal Welfare Consultant February 2000 SOURCES The author is indebted to animal welfare experts and campaigners in many countries for their help, information and advice. The recent Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare of the European Commission, on ‘Welfare Aspects of the Production of Foie Gras in Ducks and Geese’, was an invaluable source of information as was the report of Dr. Yvan Beck, ‘Cramming of Palmipeds and the Production of Foie Gras: A global approach to Society’s Choice’. Thanks to Compassion in World Farming for assistance in the production of this report. Carol McKenna is an animal welfare campaign consultant who has worked for several UK based animal protection organisations. She has seen the force feeding of geese in France. Front cover illustration: Chris Burke Advocates for Animals campaigns against all animal abuse. Its objects are the protection of animals from cruelty; the prevention of the infliction of suffering and the abolition of vivisection. Advocates for Animals 10 Queensferry Street Edinburgh EH2 4PG Tel + 44 (0)131 225 6039 [email protected] WSPA (pronounced wis-pa) works in co-operation with more than 300 member organisations in 70 countries to promote animal welfare and conservation. Registered charity 282908. WSPA UK 2 Langley Lane London SW8 1TJ Tel + 44 (0)20 7793 0540 www.wspa.org.uk Contents Introduction 7 World foie gras production 9 Natural behaviour of ducks and geese 12 Life on the foie gras farm 14 Animal welfare concerns 17 Legislation and force feeding 23 Conclusion 26 Recommendation 27 References 28 FORCED FEEDING Traditional images of foie gras farming are presented as a tourist attraction in France.
    [Show full text]