Isospora Sp from Ducks. Infectivity for the Goose, Four Anatids and the Domestic Fowl Cm Chauve, Mc Reynaud, Jm Gounel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Isospora Sp from Ducks. Infectivity for the Goose, Four Anatids and the Domestic Fowl Cm Chauve, Mc Reynaud, Jm Gounel Isospora sp from ducks. Infectivity for the goose, four anatids and the domestic fowl Cm Chauve, Mc Reynaud, Jm Gounel To cite this version: Cm Chauve, Mc Reynaud, Jm Gounel. Isospora sp from ducks. Infectivity for the goose, four anatids and the domestic fowl. Veterinary Research, BioMed Central, 1993, 24 (5), pp.430-433. hal-00902158 HAL Id: hal-00902158 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00902158 Submitted on 1 Jan 1993 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Short note Isospora sp from ducks. Infectivity for the goose, four anatids and the domestic fowl CM Chauve MC Reynaud JM Gounel 1 Laboratoire de Parasitologie, École Vétérinaire de Lyon, BP 83; 2 Département de Pathologie Animale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, École Vétérinaire de Lyon, BP 31, 69280 Marcy-/’Étoile, France (Received 30 April 1993; accepted 22 June 1993) Summary &horbar; A coccidium was isolated from mule duck farms, the sporulated oocysts of which most closely resemble that of Isospora anseris, a goose coccidium. By experimental infection, these oo- cysts were proved to be able to develop in the goose and in several duck species, but unable to de- velop in the chicken. No pathogenicity was noted in any species. coccidium I lsospora sp I duck I goose Résumé &horbar; lsospora sp chez le canard. Étude de la réceptivité de l’oie, de 4 Anatidés et de la poule. Une coccidie isolée dans des élevages de canards mulards a produit des oocystes sporulés semblables à ceux dlsospora anseris, une coccidie de l’oie. Il a été montré par infection expérimen- tale que ces oocystes étaient capables de se développer chez l’oie et chez plusieurs espèces de ca- nards mais pas chez le poulet. Aucun pouvoir pathogène n â été décelé. coccidie / Isospora sp l canard l oie INTRODUCTION other, Isospora sp, closely resembled the description of Isospora anseris (Skene et al, 1981 ). In this study, we have conduct- Coprological surveys carried out on duck ed cross-transmission trials to determine farms have revealed 2 of coccidia species whether Isospora sp is infective for mal- of the genus Isospora (Chauve et al, lard, Pekin duck, muscovy duck, mule 1992). One was identified as Isospora duck (a cross between a muscovy duck mandari, previously reported in the man- (male) and a Pekin duck (female)), do- darin duck (Bhatia et al, 1972) and the mestic goose and chicken. MATERIALS AND METHODS glass beads. The centrifuge tubes were placed on a Whirlimix and the contents agitated until the oocysts and some sporocysts had been Experimental birds shattered (Shirley, 1975). Twenty mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos Experimental design platyrhynchos), 20 Pekin ducklings (Anas platy- rhynchos domesticus), 20 muscovy ducklings (Cairina moschata), 20 mule ducklings, 20 dom- For the cross-transmission experiments, 15 estic goslings (Anser anser domesticus) and 20 birds of each species (mallards, Pekin ducks, chickens (Gallus domesticus) were obtained at muscovy ducks, mule ducks, domestic geese 1 d of age. All birds were provided with a non- and chickens) were each dosed with 3.0 x 105 medicated complete pelleted ration and water sporulated oocysts introduced into the crop by ad libitum. Food consumption was noted. They means of a flexible graduated pipette. The 5 re- were raised free of coccidia as determined by maining birds of each group served as uninocu- faecal flotation in a mercuric and potassium io- lated controls. The faeces of each infected dide solution (Hgl2: 150 g; KI: 110 g; H20: 300 group were collected twice daily from d 1 pi to d g). When used in the experiments, the birds 8 pi and examined by flotation for the presence were 11 d old. For each species of birds, a of unsporulated oocysts. The oocyst production batch of 15 infected birds was maintained in a was quantified from d 1 pi to d 8 pi: oocysts of stainless steel metabolic cage equipped with a 5 g faeces samples were counted. The uninfect- collecting tray so that all faeces of the batch ed groups were examined twice during the ex- could be accumulated during periods of 24 h, for periment: on d 4 and 8 pi. 8 d post-infection (pi) ; a batch of 5 uninfected birds was maintained in a similar cage. RESULTS Oocysts Sporulation The original oocysts of Isospora sp used as in- oculum were recovered from faecal samples col- lected from a mule duck farm in the Rh6ne- At 20 ± 2°C, in a 1 % potassium dichromate Alpes region (France). The faeces were washed solution, sporulation could be completed in through a 50-pm sieve. After 3 h of sedimenta- 36 h. With concentrations of oocysts < 2 tion, the supernatant was poured off and the sediment centrifuged (1 300 g). The sediment was resuspended in a MgS04 solution (25%) then washed in tap-water. After treatment with sodium hypochlorite (1,2° Cl) for 20 min, the un- sporulated oocysts were washed twice in tap- water. Potassium dichromate was added to make up a 1% solution. The samples were then placed in large flasks on a shaking apparatus at = 20°C for sporulation. Oocysts were examined for evidence of sporulation twice a day by flota- tion of an aliquot in a mercuric and potassium io- dide solution. The sporulated oocysts (fig 1 ) have been described previously (Chauve et al, 1992). Their dimensions were 10.9 pm x 10.0 pm. In order to measure sporocysts and sporo- zoites, a suspension of sporulated oocysts was added to a 0.1-1-cm layer of 0.5-mm diameter millions per ml, the sporulation averaged fected birds. For each species (mallards, 80% within 5 d. Pekin ducks, muscovy ducks, mule ducks, domestic geese and chickens), the food consumption was similar in infected and Measurement of sporocysts uninoculated birds. and sporozoites The sporocysts measured 8.4-10.1 by DISCUSSION 5.9-6.8 pm. The sporocyst residuum con- sisted of scat- heterogeneous granules The coccidium of the present study was tered the The throughout sporocyst. sporo- isolated from a mule-duck farm: this spe- zoites measured 6.1 2.0 by pm. cies was described for the first time in ducks (Chauve et al, 1992). The oocysts most closely resemble those of Isospora Host specificity anseris described by Skene et al (1981) from Canada geese. In their description, Faecal samples of all uninfected animals the prepatent period was 5 d, while it was collected at d 4 and 8 pi were negative for 1 d shorter in our experiment. Faecal of infected ani- oocysts. samples As sporulated oocysts were able to in- mals were collected from d 1-8 and daily pi fect geese, the coccidium of our study and those of all con- birds, except chickens, Isospora anseris could be the same spe- tained oocysts from d 4-8 pi inclusive, cies. We tried to demonstrate cross- when the was terminated experiment (table infection between geese, ducks and chick- In all the was 4 d. I). birds, prepatent period ens. We were unable to infect the chicken with the duck strain. On the contrary, mal- lard, Pekin duck, muscovy duck and mule Pathogenicity duck were found to be passing Isospora sp oocysts. It is not very surprising that this No death occurred during the experiment. coccidium is capable of replicating in differ- No anorexia was recorded in any of the in- ent anatids because Isospora spp are not as restricted in host specificity as Eimeria ACKNOWLEDGMENTS spp. From the different receptive birds, oocysts were first recovered from the faec- The authors wish to thank D Quoc-Cuong for his es at d 4 and eliminated from d 4-8 pi pi technical assistance in housing and feeding the when the was termi- inclusive, experiment birds. This project was supported by a grant nated. At d 4 pi, geese eliminated more from the Institut National de Recherche Agrono- oocysts than ducks but we failed to deter- mique (INRA), France. mine any difference between geese and ducks at d 8 pi. This survey showed that Isospora sp can parasitize geese and REFERENCES ducks. Former studies have reported other coccidial species occurring in both ducks Bhatia BB, Chauhan PPS, Arora GS, Agrawal and geese: Eimeria danailovi, a duck RD (1972) Observations on some coccidian coccidium, was experimentally transmitted infections in birds and a mammal at the Delhi to the domestic goose (Grafner et al, zoo. Indian J Anim Sci 42, 625-628 1965). This example is an uncommon re- Chauve CM, Reynaud MC, Gounel JM (1992) Isolement de deux coccidies du Iso- port of a lack of specificity of an Eimeria genre chez des canards en France. Ann If our indicates that spora species. study Isospo- Rech Vet23,395-398 ra sp can be found on duck farms, it also Grafner G, Graubmann HD, Betke P (1965) indicates that this coccidium can de- easily Dunndarm Kokzidiose bei Hausenten verur- in velop different species of ducks and sacht durch eine neue Kokzidienart, Eimeria geese. danailovi n sp. Monatsh Veterinaermed 20, 141-143 Further investigations are necessary to determine whether there are any differen- Shirley MW (1975) Enzyme variation in Eimeria of the chicken.
Recommended publications
  • The Bantam Goose
    THE BANTAM GOOSE By Jonathan M. Thompson, July 2010. The concept of producing a Bantam Goose was put to the public as early as 1877; contained in an article on the subject in The Poultry Yard & Market. Mr. Tom Bartlett of Folly Farm, Gloucestershire, when interviewed for Country Living Magazine in the late 1980’s, claimed that creating a Bantam goose had not been achieved, and he would like to create such a breed. Had he read Appleyard’s little book, Geese, he would have known his statement to be imprecise. Reginald Appleyard of the Priory Waterfowl Farm, Ixworth, Suffolk, appears to have first exhibited his Bantam Goose at the Dairy Show in 1932. In the Feathered World Year Book for 1933 Captain N. Milne Harrop contributes an article: ‘Geese in 1932’, and mentions this breed gaining a card at the Dairy Show:- The next class, that for A.O.V., numbered no less than 16 entries, and contained six different varieties. Mr. Appleyard penned a most interesting selection, . This exhibitor also showed . a very excellent attempt at an Embden Bantam, which also gained a Commended card. I understand this bird was not a freak but the result of many years careful breeding. It weighed about 6 lbs. In the same Year Book, Mr. J. P. Bleazard contributes an article ‘Waterfowl in 1932.’ and says:- One occasionally sees other breeds of Geese, . .We have this year seen another addition to the Goose section, namely, an Embden Bantam Goose and most charming it looked, and came in for much admiration by the general public at the Palace Show.
    [Show full text]
  • Incubating Waterfowl Simplified Beginner’S Checklist Calvin E
    Incubating Waterfowl Simplified Beginner’s Checklist Calvin E. Roberts, Jr. • Roberts Farm • San Augustine, Texas 75972 As much as possible, encourage ducks and geese to lay in clean dry nests. Once they begin to lay in an ideal location, keep 4-5 fake, ceramic eggs in the nest to keep them laying there. Identify the time of day when eggs are laid and collect as soon as possible. The longer the eggs sit in a dirty nest, the greater the chances of bacterial contamination. Wash hands and use only a clean, sanitized containers for collection. Touching contaminated surfaces and then touching hatching eggs will transfer the contaminates to the eggs. When necessary, rinse and sanitize eggs coated in dirt/mud immediately after collection. Oxygen exchange and water loss is impaired in coated eggs leading to early death or weakened hatchlings. Store eggs in a clean, closed container in a cool, humid location. Waterfowl eggs do not store as well as chicken eggs and should be set within 7 days of collection. Turning eggs in storage is optional. Prewarm cool eggs to room temperature prior to setting to avoid condensation (water drops) on egg shells and to assist in bringing the incubator up to temperature in a timely manner. Calibrate a separate thermometer and hygrometer to verify incubator readings. Measure temperature at mid-egg level. Never trust the incubator gauges until they have proven accurate. Set incubation temperature at 99.5-99.8°F (37.5-37.7°C). Check for warm and cool spots within the incubator and rotate eggs daily as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Extension 1984 G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock Earl W. Gleaves University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Curriculum and Instruction Commons Gleaves, Earl W., "G84-711 Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock" (1984). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. 1281. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/1281 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Extension at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. G84-711-A Managing the Home Goose Breeder Flock This NebGuide provides basic information on breed selection, sexing, housing and equipment needed, feeding, breeding, egg care and incubation for the home goose flock. Earl W. Gleaves, Extension Poultry Specialist z Breed Selection z Sexing z Housing and Equipment z Feeding z Breeding z Egg Care z Incubation The goose has been almost completely ignored in the rapid technical developments that have occurred in other parts of the poultry industry in the past 25 years. Experimental work with the domestic goose has been very limited. This means that management recommendations that are pertinent today may not be in the future. Geese total less than 1 percent of the U.S. poultry population. They have the disadvantage of being low egg producers, which causes the cost of day-old goslings to be high.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Canada Geese in Urban Environments a Technical Guide Arthur E
    Managing Canada Geese in Urban Environments A Technical Guide Arthur E. Smith, Scott R. Craven, and Paul D. Curtis A publication of Cornell Cooperative Extension, the University of Wisconsin, The Jack H. Berryman Institute, Utah State University, and The Wildlife Society, Wildlife Damage Management Working Group Arthur E. Smith is a research intern and Scott R. Craven is an extension wildlife specialist with the Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Paul D. Curtis is an extension wildlife specialist in the Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University. Acknowledgments We especially want to thank M. R. Conover and the Jack H. Berryman Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, for reviews and support in producing this manual. The Wildlife Society–Wildlife Damage Management Working Group’s Urban/Suburban Canada Goose Task Force Committee also provided review and support for this manuscript. We also thank S. Beckerman, H. Blokpoel, E. C. Cleary, R. A. Dolbeer, M. E. Eckstrom, G. Haas, R. S. Lutz, P. J. Rodrick, K. Solberg, W. E. Wheeler, P. C. Whitford, members of the Mississippi Flyway Council Technical Section Giant Canada Goose Committee, especially G. Zenner and J. Bergquist. This publication should be cited as Smith, A. E., S. R. Craven, and P. D. Curtis. 1999. Managing Canada geese in urban environments. Jack Berryman Institute Publication 16, and Cornell University Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, N.Y. Additional copies of this publication may be purchased from Cornell University, Media and Technology Services Resource Center, 7 Cornell Business & Technology Park, Ithaca, NY 14850. Phone: 607-255-2080. Fax: 607-255-9946. E-mail: [email protected] A free catalog of Cornell Cooperative Extension publications and audiovisuals is available from the same address, or from any Cornell Cooperative Extension office.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Medicine (Avian Science, Technology and Practice) [Samad MA (2013)
    LEP Publication No. 13 Avian Medicine (Avian Science, Technology and Practice) [Samad MA (2013). Avian Medicine] 1st Published as: Poultry Science and Medicine: February 2005 2nd Edition as: Avian Medicine: January 2013 ISSN 984-8094-01-1 Language: English Published by: M. Bulbul, Mymensingh, Bangladesh Printed at: Bikash Mudran, 56/5, Fakirepool Bazar, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Total pages (9.5 x 7): 1374 Price BDT: 950.0 / copy and US $ 20.0 / copy Stock: Available with limited stock 1 Avian Medicine [2nd Edition: January 2013] PREFACE Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem I’m pleased to present the 2nd edition of ‘Avian Medicine’ about seven years since the first ‘Poultry Science and Medicine’ was published in 2005. For this edition, significant changes were needed to keep up-to-date with the increasingly rapid expansion of knowledge about the Avian science, technology and practices. The main role of Poultry Vets is to minimize the cost of poultry production and ensure that its products are safe for human consumption. Veterinarians have a major responsibility to ensure that the meat and eggs produced by the poultry under their care are free from pathogens, chemicals, anti-microbial and other drugs that may be harmful to humans. The Veterinary Medical students and Avian Vets must become knowledge about various aspects of birds, especially disease and management associated with impaired production. Such Avian Vets will become specialists who can provide totally integrated avian health and management advice either to the poultry, pet, zoo or wild birds. To be able to do this Avian Vets will need to understand courses on ‘Avian Medicine’ and develop the expertise on their own by diligent self-education in Avian Vet practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Patterns of Two Chinese Native Goose Breeds
    Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola ISSN 1516-635X Apr - Jun 2017 / v.19 / n.2 / 203-210 Growth Patterns of Two Chinese Native Goose Breeds http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0395 Author(s) ABSTracT Ibtisham FI To study the development rules of Chinese native geese, two breeds, An LI Shitou and Sichuan White geese were analyzed from 0 to 12 weeks of Li TI Niu YI age. The growth curves were fitted with commonly used four kinds of Xiao MI nonlinear models (Logistic, Gompertz, Von Bertalanffy and Richards). Zhang LI Jia RI The results showed that the growth curves were appropriately fitted with all four models but the Logistic and Richards both had the best fitting with growth curve (R2>0.99). Analyzing the fitting parameters of I Agricultural College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, P.R. China the Logistic and Richards, we found that male Shitou had the highest adult body weight while Sichuan White female had the lowest weight. In Shitou breed, Shape parameter Predicted with Richards model was corresponded with Gompertz curve, while in Sichuan breed it was in between Gompertz and Bertalanffy. Growth parameters predicted with Logistic model was much more closed to observed value as compared others. So overall logistic was the best model to analyze the growth curve in Chinese native goose and Shitou goose had excellent growth performance when compared to Sichuan White. INTRODUCTION Goose is one of the most important economic poultry around the Mail Address world because of the growing demand of the human population.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Gardens, Copenhagen) (With 1 Plate) (Ree
    MORPHOLOGICAL AND ETHOLOGICAL NOTES ON A HYBRID BETWEEN A DOMESTIC DUCK AND A DOMESTIC GOOSE by HOLGER POULSEN (Zoological Gardens, Copenhagen) (With 1 plate) (Ree. 22-V-1950) Although interspecific crosses, especially those between species of dif- ferent genera, are rare in nature, interbreeding is much commoner in captivity . The Copenhagen Zoological Gardens possess two hybrids between Branta canadensis L. and An.ser albifrons gambelli Hartl., which were captured 1944 in Sarquaq in West Greenland. These birds, incidentally, were the only existing proof of the breeding of the Canada Goose in Greenland (Verbal information from Dr F. SALOMONSEN). When species which are not known to interbreed in nature do so in captivi- ty, we are usually concerned with individuals which have been kept in isolation from their own species. Under these conditions the reproductive drive may become extremely strong, so that the threshold for stimuli releasing repro- ductive, especially sexual, behaviour is considerably lowered. In such cases individuals of other species may be accepted as partners although they offer stimuli which would normally be inadequate to release sexual reactions. The sexual drive may even become so strong that sexual behaviour occurs in vacuo. Until recently, interest in problems of interbreeding was focussed mainly upon the question of what species would hybridise, and upon the morpho- logical features and fertility of the hybrids. During the last few years, however, hybrids have received attention from behaviour students. In com- parative ethology it is important to know the behaviour of hybrids, and to compare it with that of the parent species. The behaviour of a hybrid is not always intermediate between that of its parents, but may show more pri- mitive traits (LoRErrz, 1941, p.
    [Show full text]
  • 102.Domestication
    History of Poultry Origin and Domestication 1. Chicken Different archaeological surveys indicate that chickens were originated from the Red Jungle fowl (Gallus gallus ) in the Indus valley about 200 B.C. and believe that it may be the chief ancestor of modern chicken. But it is also believed that another three wild species of chicken have been contributed to develop modern chicken which found in South East Asia. India and throughout mainland of Southeast Asia to the off-shore island of Indonesia are the ancestral home of the present day domestic fowl. The four species are closely related and are known to interbreed. The species are- 01. the Red Jungle fowl (Gallus gallus ) 02. the Grey Jungle fowl (Gallus sonnerati) 03. the Ceylon Jungle fowl (Gallus lafayetti) 04. the Black/Green/ Java Jungle fowl (Gallus varius). Our ancient history bears witness to the fact that the people of India were quite familiar with chicken, duck, quail and turkey, about 3200 years B.C. Quail or cock fight provided as a source of fun. Domesticated fowls could certainly be found in Iran by 800 B.C. and the Persians spread them throughout Western Asia and to the shores of the Mediterranean by 600 B.C. They were introduced in Italy by 400 B. C. northern Europe by 100 B.C. Chicken was imported into the America and Australia by the early European explorers and immigrants. To-day they are considered as vital source of animal protein throughout the world. 2. Duck The wild duck was first domesticated in Asia also. The modern improved duck breeds or varieties are derived from the wild stock.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSERIFORMES Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 3Rd Edition • 2020 - 2025
    ANSERIFORMES Taxon Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 3rd Edition • 2020 - 2025 Edited by Photo by Pinola Conservancy Keith Lovett, Anseriformes TAG Chair Buttonwood Park Zoo Table of Contents Acknowledgements 03 TAG Operational Structure 04 TAG Steering Committee and Advisors: Table 1 05 TAG Definition 06 TAG Mission 06 TAG Vision 06 TAG Strategic Planning Overview 07 TAG Goals Sustainability 08 Conservation 09 Husbandry and Welfare 09 Educational Waterfowl Awareness and Program Support 10 TAG Taxonomy 11 TAG Taxonomy: Table 2 12 Conservation Status of Anseriformes Overview 13 Conservation Status of Anseriformes: Table 3 14 RCP History and Program Designation Program Management Designation 20 Additional Management Designation 21 Selection Criteria Selection Criteria Overview 22 Decision Tree Selection Criteria Categories 23 Proposed EAZA Waterfowl TAG European Endangered 24 Species Program (EEP) Species Anseriformes Decision Tree: Table 4 25 Anseriformes TAG Selection Criteria / Decision Tree: Table 5 26 Anseriformes TAG Selection Criteria / Decision Tree Summary 33 Space Assessment Space Assessment Overview 34 Space Survey Accountability:Responding Insititutions: Table 6 35 Space Survey Accountability: Non-responding Insititutions: Table 7 37 Space Survey Results and Target Size: Table 8 38 Regional Anseriformes Populations: Table 9 39 Summary Table 46 Non-Recommended Species Replacement Overview 47 Non-Recommended Species Replacement Chart: Table 11 48 Management Update: Table 12 51 SSP Five Year Goals and Essential Actions 53
    [Show full text]
  • DOMESTIC SPECIES LIST August 2010 Animal Group Order Family Genus Species Common Name(S) Comments
    Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department page 1 of 3 Wild Bird and Animal Importation and Possession DOMESTIC SPECIES LIST August 2010 Animal Group Order Family Genus Species Common Name(s) Comments Mammals* Artiodactyla Bovidae Bison bison American bison Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos indicus Zebu Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos grunniens Domestic yak Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bos taurus Domestic cow Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Bubalis bubalis Domestic water buffalo Including breeds and varrieties derived from the wild Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Capra hircus Domestic goat goat or bezoar (Capra aegagrus ). Mammals Artiodactyla Bovidae Ovis aries Domestic sheep Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Camelus dromedarius Dromedary Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Lama glama Llama Mammals Artiodactyla Camelidae Lama pacos Alpaca Mammals Artiodactyla Cervidae Cervus elaphus European Red Deer Mammals Artiodactyla Cervidae Dama dama Fallow deer Including breeds and varieties derived from the wild boar (Sus scrofa ) but not including free-living or feral Mammals Artiodactyla Suidae Sus domesticus Domestic swine wild boars or wild swine. Mammals Carnivora Canidae Canis familiaris Domestic dog Mammals Carnivora Felidae Felis catus Domestic cat Mammals Carnivora Mustelidae Mustela putorious furo European ferret Including breeds, varieties, and strains derived from the European rabbit but not including the Eurpoean rabbit ferae naturae and not including the so-called Mammals Lagomorpha Leporidae Oryctolagus cuniculus Domestic rabbit "San Juan" rabbit. Mammals Perissodactyla Equidae Equus asinus Domestic ass Mammals Perissodactyla Equidae Equus caballus Domestic horse Birds* Anseriformes Anatidae Alopochen aegyptiaca Domestic goose Derived from the Egyptian goose Derived from the Mallard (Anas platyrhinos ), including, but not restricted to, Aylesbury duck, Blue Swedish duck, Buff duck, Cayuga duck, Crested White duck, English call duck, Indian runner duck, Pekin duck, and Birds Anseriformes Anatidae Anas platyrhynchos Domestic duck Roen duck.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION of NATIVE SLOVAK CHICKEN and GOOSE: a Review
    The 5th International Scientific Conference “Animal Biotechnology” Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 50, 2017 (4): 144–148 © 2017 NPPC ISSN 1337-9984 CHARACTERIZATION OF NATIVE SLOVAK CHICKEN AND GOOSE: A REVIEW E. HANUSOVÁ1*, C. HRNČÁR2, A. HANUS1, Ľ. ONDRUŠKA1 1NPPC – Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Slovak Republic 2Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovak Republic ABSTRACT Nowadays, there are four local poultry breeds originating from different parts of Slovakia. At present time, there are registered low numbers of native breeds of poultry on the territory of Slovakia. In the last century, four poultry breeds were created - chickens (Oravka, Bantam Oravka) and goose (Suchovska goose and Slovak goose). In this article we collected and analyzed the data about the origin, breed characteristics and population size of native poultry breeds. Key words: chicken; goose; Oravka breed; Slovak goose; Suchovska goose INTRODUCTION in domestic poultry breeds. In the last century four poultry breeds were bred in Slovakia – Oravka and The current economic situation causes an interest Bantam Oravka chickens, Suchovska goose and Slovak in specialized poultry lines in advanced countries goose. in the world, focusing on egg-laying or meat-based performance. Due to the very intense breeding, many genes are lost and they may be missing in future. CHICKEN Therefore, the reasons for keeping poultry genetic resources are the same as for all species of farm animals. The domestic chicken is descended primarily Characteristics of poultry genetic resources include from the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and is the collection of population size data, its structure scientifically classified as the same species.
    [Show full text]
  • Being a Practical Treatise on the Management of Domestic Poultry
    m THE AMERICAN T JPj)ULTRY BOOK; BEING A PRACTICAL TREATISE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF DOMESTIC POULTRY. BY MICAJAH H. COCK. "A very considerable part o' all the property of *>\ery nation consists " of its domesticated animals WM. COOPER, Ann. Discourse. NEW YORK: HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE. 1861. Entered, according to Act of in the Congress, year 1843, by HARPER & BROTHERS, In the Clerk's Office of the Southern District of New York. THE Board of Agriculture of the American Insti- " tute have, by a Committee, examined The Ameri- can Poultry Book, a practical Treatise on the Man- agement of Domestic Poultry," and are happy to assure the agricultural community in New-York and the United States, that this valuable work ex- actly supplies a deficiency which has long been felt in this department of the Agricultural Library. They have no doubt that it will soon find its place in every farmhouse, and wherever a taste exists for rural habits. The above recommendation was unanimously awarded at the meeting of the Board, May 18th, 1843. Signed, on behalf of the Board : NICHOLAS WYCKOFF, Vice-president. JNO. O. CHOULES, Secretary. INDEX. Page Age of Fowls 27 Eggs, Composition of . 73 Age of Geese 153 Eggs, Shape of .... 75 Age of Ducks 148 Eggs, Size of ..... 76 Amputation of Wing . 134 Eggs, Number of ... 79 Animal Food 114 Eggs, Preservation of . 86 Artificial Eggs .... 63 Every-day Hen .... 30 Artificial Incubation . 96 Fasciola Tracheae . .127 Artificial Food . .110 Fattening Coops . .112 Ashes 54 Fattening Chickens . .111 32 Bantam Breed .... Fattening Ducks .
    [Show full text]