Annual Report 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2016 Report & Accounts GREATER MANCHESTER 2016 PENSION FUND Administered by THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 Contents Chair’s Introduction 4 Management structure 6 Training & attendance 9 Top 20 equity holdings 11 Investment report 12 Myners principles 25 Financial performance report 26 Statement of accounts 31 Actuarial statement 69 Scheme administration 71 Employer contributions 77 The LGPS at a glance 95 Policy Statements - Funding Strategy Statement 99 - Governance Policy 117 - Governance Compliance Statement 121 - Core Belief Statement 127 - Statement of Investment Principles 129 - Communications Policy 137 - Pension Administration Strategy 141 Useful contacts 148 3 Chair’s introduction 2015/16 has been an exceptionally challenging year for Funding issues pensions in general and local authority pensions in particular. The triennial actuarial valuation of GMPF is currently taking Defined benefit pension schemes continue to face the place, with an effective date of 31 March 2016. Despite the challenges of the impact of monetary policy with the UK challenging economic conditions, we expect GMPF to remain base rate of interest remaining at 0.5% for a seventh year one of the best funded LGPS funds. This will be evidenced together with the continued impact of quantitative easing when, for the first time, all funds will be required to also report (QE) that has resulted in exceptionally low long term interest their valuation results using consistent actuarial assumptions. rates and negative nominal rates in some Government bond We will look to work with our employers to produce a markets. This results in a higher value being placed on pension contribution outcome that is fair to the employers and is promises earned. prudent for the management of GMPF. Our employers continue to face the impact of austerity measures and Government policies on public service delivery. Investment performance & management This has resulted in workforces shrinking, the number of arrangements employers increasing and a potential weakening of the Over 2015/16, GMPF's assets under management reduced covenant strength of some of GMPF’s employers. by £267 million to £17,325 million, reflecting the increasing This results in the maturity of the liabilities increasing across maturity of GMPF's liabilities and an investment return of the Fund with a wider range liability profiles amongst -0.8%. This is a disappointing return, and was below the local employers. authority average of 0.2%. In such challenging times, it is imperative that GMPF Over the last 15 years, GMPF’s return has been 6.5% per maintains its long term approach which has delivered annum, compared to the local authority average of 5.9% per successful outcomes over many years, whilst at the same time annum. It is this strong long term investment performance embracing the opportunities that arise to further enhance its that has supported the funding level. performance and resilience. Highlights of the year were the successful integration of During the year GMPF's key achievements include: £3 billion of assets in respect of Probation Service members into GMPF's Main Fund, the development of a trigger z Responding to the Government’s initiative to ‘pool’ LGPS process to capitalise on market opportunities as they arise, assets by jointly proposing a £35 billion pool that will seek and the further strengthening of investment management to lead on infrastructure investment and be recognised as arrangements by appointing three managers specialising in the lowest cost pool in the LGPS higher yielding debt to a framework. One of these managers z Creation of the first direct infrastructure investment vehicle has been selected to commence their role for GMPF in the in the LGPS coming year. z Completing the successful integration of the £3 billion of Membership changes assets received follwing GMPF becoming the sole provider During the year the number of employee members in GMPF of LGPS benefits to the Probation Service. reduced, but this reduction was more than made up by GMPF has responded to the requirement from Government increases in the number of deferred and pensioner members. that LGPS funds pool their investments at a scale of at least In total the membership increased over the year from 341,317 £25 billion by submitting a proposal to form the ‘Northern to 352,292 – some 10,975 extra pension accounts. As well as Pool’ with Merseyside Pension Fund and West Yorkshire being the largest LGPS fund in the country in terms of assets Pension Fund. The Northern Pool will consist of three of the under management, GMPF is also the largest in terms of largest LGPS Funds and total over £35 billion in assets. The members. funds share similar values in terms of providing high-quality, The number of contributing employers also grew during the low-cost pension delivery with an emphasis on simplicity year, up from 431 last year to 470 this year. and scale in the investment management arrangements. The Pool will seek to minimise any transitional costs and focus on the management of alternative assets such as infrastructure, property and private equity. The year saw the integration of £3 billion worth of assets, following GMPF becoming the sole provider of LGPS benefits to the Probation Service. 4 Local investment We continue to progress local investment opportunities with As part of the LGPS pooling discussions, it has recently the twin aims of commercial returns and supporting the area. been announced the West Yorkshire, Merseyside and Lancashire County Council pension funds will join GLIL, Some examples include a new development at First Street in which together with an additional commitment from Manchester with a development value of £70 million creating GMPF will result in total commitments to GLIL exceeding 170,000 sq ft of office space and providing local jobs. £1 billion. GMPF has also set up a programme of lending and providing equity capital to small and medium sized enterprises in the New home North West of England. The total commitment to these GMPF moved into a new office in Droylsden in September arrangements is over £50 million and it is made in partnership which has enabled all staff to be located in the same building with renowned financial institutions who, like GMPF, have a and will support our ongoing desire to improve effectiveness primary aim of generating commercial returns. and efficiency. The move went well and the new facilities will support GMPF’s future growth and success. Infrastructure Investment In April 2015, GMPF and the London Pensions Fund Authority Conclusion (LPFA) formed a joint venture to invest directly in infrastructure This has been another exceptional year to be managing a assets, with a focus on the UK. The joint venture is formed pension fund. The issues I have commented on show only a as a limited liability partnership (LLP) and has been named fraction of the complexity and challenge of offering a high- "The GMPF & LPFA Infrastructure LLP" (GLIL). GMPF and LPFA quality, affordable pension scheme to employers and their have each committed £250 million to GLIL. GLIL’s Investment employees. Committee is made up of officers from each funds’ investment We have long recognised the need to communicate with all of team. our stakeholders and and be able to respond to the challenges GLIL began investing in October 2015 and has completed that the future brings. We also need to balance the short and two transactions in the renewable energy sector, totalling long term needs of employers in a prudent way from a GMPF £210 million. The most recent of these transactions was the perspective. purchase from SSE plc of a 21.7% stake in Clyde wind farm for GMPF has a long term successful track record reflected in £150 million. Clyde is one of the largest onshore windfarms in its funding level and reputation. Our proposed pooling Europe, with 154 operational turbines, capable of generating arrangements are designed to ensure that this continues. 350 MW. SSE is in the process of constructing a further 54, more powerful turbines on the site, in which GLIL will have the Since the year end there has been a major change in the option to invest. management of GMPF, with the retirement of Peter Morris, the long standing Executive Director of Pensions. Peter has made an outstanding contribution to the success of GMPF and all of us at GMPF wish him a long and happy retirement. Sandra Stewart, who has played a significant part in the strategic management of the Fund for over 15 years is the new Executive Director for GMPF and leads a strong management team ready to take on the new challenges ahead. The GMPF Management Panel and I will continue to take decisions from a long term perspective to help maintain our success. I thank the members of the Panel, the Advisors, the Local Pensions Board, Investment Managers and not least our staff for their work over what has been another exceptional year. Councillor Kieran Quinn Chair, Pension Fund Management Panel 5 Management structure Tameside MBC became GMPF’s administering authority in 1987, and established a management structure which is still the backbone of the operation today. Pension Fund Management Panel The Management Panel carries out a similar role to the trustees of a pension scheme. They are the key decision makers for: z Investment management z Monitoring investment activity and performance z Overseeing administrative activities z Guidance to officers in exercising delegated powers. Each local authority is represented on the Management Panel, as is the Ministry of Justice. Pension Fund Advisory Panel The Pension Fund Advisory Panel works closely with the Management Panel, and advises them in all areas. Each local authority is represented on the Advisory Panel, and Members of the Management and Advisory Panels (left to there are six employee representatives right) Councillor Halliwell from Wigan MBC and nominated by the North West TUC.
Recommended publications
  • Manchester Metrolink Tram System
    Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayfarer Rail Diagram 2020 (TPL Spring 2020)
    Darwen Littleborough Chorley Bury Parbold Entwistle Rochdale Railway Smithy Adlington Radcliffe Kingsway Station Bridge Newbold Milnrow Newhey Appley Bridge Bromley Cross Business Park Whitefield Rochdale Blackrod Town Centre Gathurst Hall i' th' Wood Rochdale Shaw and Besses o' th' Barn Crompton Horwich Parkway Bolton Castleton Oldham Orrell Prestwich Westwood Central Moses Gate Mills Hill Derker Pemberton Heaton Park Lostock Freehold Oldham Oldham Farnworth Bowker Vale King Street Mumps Wigan North Wigan South Western Wallgate Kearsley Crumpsall Chadderton Moston Clifton Abraham Moss Hollinwood Ince Westhoughton Queens Road Hindley Failsworth MonsallCentral Manchester Park Newton Heath Salford Crescent Salford Central Victoria and Moston Ashton-underStalybridgeMossley Greenfield -Lyne Clayton Hall Exchange Victoria Square Velopark Bryn Swinton Daisy HillHag FoldAthertonWalkdenMoorside Shudehill Etihad Campus Deansgate- Market St Holt Town Edge Lane Droylsden Eccles Castlefield AudenshawAshtonAshton Moss West Piccadilly New Islington Cemetery Road Patricroft Gardens Ashton-under-Lyne Piccadilly St Peter’s Guide Weaste Square ArdwickAshburys GortonFairfield Bridge FloweryNewton FieldGodley for HydeHattersleyBroadbottomDinting Hadfield Eccles Langworthy Cornbrook Deansgate Manchester Manchester Newton-le- Ladywell Broadway Pomona Oxford Road Belle Vue Willows HarbourAnchorage City Salford QuaysExchange Quay Piccadilly Hyde North MediaCityUK Ryder Denton Glossop Brow Earlestown Trafford Hyde Central intu Wharfside Bar Reddish Trafford North
    [Show full text]
  • (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: a Greater Manchester Case Study
    WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Working Paper 24 August 2017 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Stephanie Thomson and Ruth Lupton 1 WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Acknowledgements This project is part of the Social Policy in a Cold Climate programme funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Nuffield Foundation, and Trust for London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders. We would like to thank Somayeh Taheri for her help with the maps in this paper. We would also like to thank John Hills, Anne West, and Robert Walker who read earlier versions for their helpful comments. Finally, sincere thanks to Cheryl Conner for her help with the production of the paper. Any errors that remain are, of course, ours. Authors Stephanie Thomson, is a Departmental Lecturer in Comparative Social Policy at the University of Oxford. Ruth Lupton, is Professor of Education at the University of Manchester and Visiting Professor at The Centre for Analyis of Social Exclusion, The London School of Economics and Political Science. 2 WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Contents List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 3 List of tables ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Changes to School Systems in the four areas ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 794 Rot-Row :Manchester Suburban [Slater's
    794 ROT-ROW :MANCHESTER SUBURBAN [SLATER'S Rothwell Williarn, policeman, Police station, Ellesmere Ro"e Charles H. coach builder, 32 Stovell road, M strePt, Pendlebury Rowe Clan~ (1hs.), householder, 12 Lime street, L RothwPll William Hy. confectioner, 267 Stockpmt rd. L Rowe Herbert H. telegraphisb, 40 Silton st. Ashley la. M Rottenbury Robert, ti.t:J:er, 219 Walkden road, 'Yorsley Rowe John, householder, 32 Birch avePue, Heaton Moor Roughley James, cashier, 429 Worsley road, Wmton Rowe Joseph, carter, 30 Denm<~rk street, A Rrmahley John Hy. corn. traveller, 15 IIaddon gro. Sale Rowe Robert, engineer, 38 Carlton road, A on ~~ Roughly Eliza (Mrs.), shopl_•eeper, II Albion st.P~~dle~ry Rowe Rosalinc (Sirs.), householder, 220 .Moseley rd. F Rough sedge Harry, compositor, g Hard man la.F ails~ rth Rowe William warper, 294 Walkden road, Worsley Roughton Horace, coach proprietor, 12 Manchester rd. ; Howerth John: brass finisher, 214 Worsley road, Win ton res. 6 ~lshfield road, Cheadle RowLmd B. R. & Co. Limited, engineers, Climax works, Roughton Wm. electrical engineer, 26 1Vilson st.Strctfrd Sandfold lane, :Sorth Reddish. T N 47 Heaton .\[oor Rou'n.<t .Annie E. (Mrs.), dress maker, 39 Gild a Brk. rd. E Rowland Benjamin, miller, 39 Brcntwood road, 'I' R und Bcnjamin Charles, householder, 9 Booth street, Howland David, joiner, 45 Didsbury road, Heaton Norris Rovle street, Denton Row land Eleanor (.\>Irs. ), hsehldr. 896 Chester rd. Stretfi d Ronr"ke Ann (~Irs.), househldr. 15 Cobden st.Water la.D Rowland George Herbcrt, houschldr. 8 Charlton road, L Rou rke Ann (Mrs.), househldr. 7 Sa lis bmy st.
    [Show full text]
  • Ryecroft Hall Audenshaw
    DENTON & AUDENSHAW DISTRICT ASSEMBLY RYECROFT HALL AUDENSHAW MANAGEMENT PLAN 2007/2011 1 CCOONNTTEENNTTSS PPaaggee 1. Tameside’s vision for Ryecroft 3 2. Site Details 4 3. Strategic Context 11 4. A Welcoming Place 17 5. Healthy, Safe and Secure 18 6. Clean and Well Maintained 21 7. Sustainability 23 8. Conservation and Heritage 26 9. Community Involvement 28 10. Marketing 31 11. Management 33 2 1. Tameside’s vision for Ryecroft “We want Tameside to be an attractive and environmentally friendly place to live, work and visit. We are committed to working with local communities to protect and improve our surroundings to make Tameside a cleaner and more accessible place for current and future generations”. This statement is the District Assembly’s vision for the future of Ryecroft Hall. The statement is taken from Tameside’s Community Strategy 2003/ 2013 where one of the key themes is ‘An Attractive Borough’ and was identified via extensive consultation with both local residents and businesses. The basis for managing and improving Ryecroft Hall are the eight standards set out in the Green Flag criteria, which are: • A Welcoming Place • Conservation and Heritage • Healthy, Safe and Secure • Community Involvement • Clean and Well Maintained • Marketing • Sustainability • Management As part of this vision we are committed to year on year improvements to our Parks and open spaces. 3 2. Site Details Name: Ryecroft Hall Contact: Nick Sayers, Assistant Town Manager Denton and Audenshaw District Assembly Market Street Denton M34 2AP Location: Grid Reference: 391453: 397817 Map Reference: SJ9197NW Ryecroft Hall is situated in Audenshaw between Droylsden and Ashton­Under­Lyne Area: 2.549 Hectares Tenure: The land is owned by Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Services in the Trafford Area Which Can Be Downloaded At
    School Bus Services in the Manchester Area September 2017 to July 2018 Page 1 Contents List Secondary Schools Page: Abraham Moss Community School 4 The Barlow RC High School 5-8 Burnage Academy for Boys 9-10 Cedar Mount Academy 11 Chorlton High School 12-13 The Co-operative Academy of Manchester 14 Dean Trust Ardwick 15 The East Manchester Academy 16-17 The King David High School 18-19 Levenshulme High School 20 Loreto High School Chorlton 21 Manchester Academy 22-23 Manchester Communications Academy 24 Manchester Creative & Media Academy 25 Manchester Enterprise Academy Central 26 Manchester Enterprise Academy Wythenshawe 26-27 Manchester Health Academy 28 Newall Green High School 29 Our Lady’s R.C. High School 30 Parrs Wood High School 31-33 St. Matthew’s RC High School 34-35 Saint Paul’s Catholic High School 36 St Peter’s RC High School 37-39 Trinity Church of England High School 40-41 Whalley Range 11-18 High School 42 William Hulme’s Grammar School 43 Wright Robinson College 44-47 Further Education Colleges Page: Loreto College 48-50 Page 2 Secondary Schools outside Manchester Page: Bury – Parrenthorn High School 51 Oldham – Blessed John Hnery Newman College 52 Oldham – Blue Coat School 52 Oldham – Crompton House School 53 Oldham – Oasis Academy 53 Oldham – Radclyffe School 54 Stockport – Cheadle RC Infant/Junior School 55 Stockport – St. James RC High School 55 Tameside – Audenshaw School 56 Tameside – Denton Community College 56 Tameside – Fairfield High School for Girls 57 Tameside – St. Damian’s RC Science College 58 Tameside – St.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire
    Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire Andrew Teale December 4, 2011 Abstract This submission disagrees with and presents a counter-proposal to the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals for new parliamentary con- stituency boundaries in Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The counter- proposal allocates seven whole constituencies to the boroughs of Stockport, Tameside and Oldham, nine whole constituencies to the boroughs of Man- chester, Salford and Trafford, and twenty-four whole constituencies to the rest of the region. No comment is made on the Boundary Commission’s proposals for the rest of the North West region or for any other region. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 The statutory criteria.........................2 1.2 Splitting of wards...........................3 2 Theoretical entitlements4 3 Southern Greater Manchester5 3.1 Manchester, Salford and Trafford..................5 3.2 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside.................. 10 4 Lancashire and Northern Greater Manchester 14 4.1 Crossing the boundary between Greater Manchester and Lancashire 16 4.2 Rochdale................................ 17 4.3 Bolton, Bury, Wigan and Rossendale................ 18 4.4 South Lancashire........................... 22 4.5 East Lancashire............................ 23 4.6 North Lancashire........................... 24 4.7 Summary................................ 25 5 Closing remarks 28 1 1 Introduction This document is my submission to the 2013 Review of Parliamentary constit- uency boundaries. I should first introduce myself. I am the editor and webmaster of the Lo- cal Elections Archive Project (http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/), the in- ternet’s largest freely available collection of British local election results. I have been for some years a contributor to election-related web forums, and this submission is based on material originally posted on the Vote UK forum (http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/) and in some cases modified in the light of comments made.
    [Show full text]
  • OLDHAM's STRATEGY for the PROVISION of EDUCATION PLACES 2016
    “A great place to learn” OLDHAM’s STRATEGY FOR THE PROVISION OF EDUCATION PLACES 2016 - 2020 DATE VERSION SUMMARY OF CHANGES BY WHOM 01.02.2016 Initial draft 0.1 Updated to include feedback Gill Hoar 19.02.2016 Initial draft 0.7 Updated to include feedback Gill Hoar 19.02.2016 Draft 1.0 Conversion to Draft status Gill Hoar 23.03.2016 Draft 1.4 Organogram added Gill Hoar 15.04.2016 Final draft 2.0 Updates following final feedback Gill Hoar 18.04.201 Final draft 2.1 ToR for EPG Gill Hoar 20.04.2016 Final draft 2.2 Updated provider lists Gill Hoar 28.0.2016 Final draft 2.3 Amendments following EPG Gill Hoar CONTENTS Foreword Page 3 Introduction Page 4 Principles and local context Page 5 Needs analysis Page 6 Funding streams for capital works Page 7 Revenue Funding Implications Page 9 Decision making and governance Page 10 Variable over the lifetime of the Strategy Page 12 Glossary of terms Page 13 Appendix A: Schools in Oldham Page 16 Appendix B: Annual School Capacity Assessment 2015 Page 24 Appendix C: Pupil forecasting methodology Page 32 Appendix D: Decision Support Matrix Page 54 Appendix E: Draft Academy Conversion policy Page 60 Appendix F: Education Provision Group, Terms of Reference Page 61 Appendix G: Schemes considered as priority – January 2016 Page 66 Page 2 of 66 April 2016 FOREWORD BY COUNCILLOR SHOAB AKHTAR, Cabinet member for Education and Skills Oldham Council, along with many other local authorities nationally, is facing the significant challenge presented by the increase in demand for school places.
    [Show full text]
  • MACFEST MUSLIM Arts and CULTURE FESTIVAL
    MACFEST MUSLIM ARTs AND CULTURE FESTIVAL CELEBRATING ARTS AND CONNECTING COMMUNITIES OVER 50 EVENTS JANUARY - MAY 2020 WWW.MACFEST.ORG.UK [email protected] @MACFESTUK FESTIVAL HIGHLIGHTS METALWARE FROM KEYNOTE ADDRESS FAMOUS WRITERS: THE KHALEEQ BY PROF SALIM FIRDAUSI COLLECTION AL-HASSANI CULTURAL HUBS: CREATIVE PAPER CELEBRATING OUR WOMEN OF SCIENCE CUTTING WORLD AND DIVERSE CULTURES MUSICAL FINALE SPANISH AL FIRDAUS WITH SOAS ENSEMBLE AT THE COLLECTIVE LOWRY WELCOME MUSLIM ARTS AND CULTURE FESTIVAL Welcome to our second MACFEST, a ground- Art Gallery). We are delighted to partner with breaking and award-winning Muslim Arts and Rochdale and Huddersfield Literary Festivals, Culture Festival in the North West of the UK. Rossendale Art Trail/Apna Festival, Stretford Its mission: celebrating arts, diversity and Festival and Greater Manchester Walking connecting communities. Festival. We are proud to offer you a rich feast of over 50 In addition, various schools, Colleges and the events in 16 days across Greater Manchester University of Manchester are hosting MACFEST celebrating the rich heritage of the Muslim Days, with arts and cultural activities. We are diaspora communities. There is something delighted to bring you a great line up of local, for the whole family: literature, art, history, national and international speakers, performers music, films, performance, culture, comedy, art and artists including singers and musicians from exhibitions, demonstrations, book launches, Spain and Morocco. debates, workshops, and cultural hubs. MACFEST’s opening ceremony on the 11th Join us! Over 50 events across Greater January 2020 is open to the public. Manchester and the North West are free. The venue for the packed Weekend Festival Enjoy! on 11th and 12th January, is the iconic British Muslim Heritage Centre in Whalley Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Audenshaw School (0820 - 1445)
    Effective 1 September 2020 AUDENSHAW SCHOOL (0820 - 1445) The following general bus services provide links to Audenshaw High School: 221: Dukinfield – Audenshaw – Openshaw - Manchester For the latest timetable information go to www.tfgm.com/public-transport/bus YELLOW SCHOOL BUS SERVICE Y15: the requirement for students to obtain a pass to travel on this service has been removed for September 2020 DANE BANK – DENTON - AUDENSHAW SCHOOL Service Y15 TfGM Contract: Number: 5030 TfGM Contract: Number: 5030 Minimum Capacity: 63 Minimum Capacity: 63 Operator Code: BEV Operator Code: BEV DANE BANK 0725 AUDENSHAW SCHOOL 1450 Denton, Crown Point 0745 DANE BANK 1505 AUDENSHAW SCHOOL 0755 ROUTE: From DANE BANK, Windmill Lane Post Office via Windmill Lane, Thornley Lane South, Anson Road, Windsor Road, Ash Road, Balmoral Drive, Manchester Road, Ashton Road, Denton Road, Stamford Road to AUDENSHAW SCHOOL. Returns via Stamford Road, Corporation Road, Taylor Lane, Seymour Street, Manchester Road, Balmoral Drive, Richmond Road, Windsor Road, Windmill Lane to DANE BANK, terminus. AUDENSHAW SCHOOL – DUKINFIELD Service 721 TfGM Contract: Number: 5056 Minimum Capacity: 52 Operator Code: SM Service Number: 721 AUDENSHAW SCHOOL 1450 Globe Square 1455 Dukinfield, Town Hall 1458 Boyds Walk/Armadale Road 1504 DUKINFIELD, Tennyson Avenue 1512 SERVICE 721: From AUDENSHAW SCHOOL via Stamford Road, Coronation Square, Stamford Road, Shepley Road, Ashton Street, Astley Street, King Street, Boyds Walk, Birch Lane, Oxford Road, Lodge Lane, Cheetham Hill Road, Yew Tree
    [Show full text]
  • People Achieveto
    ® inspiring young people achieveto Annual Review 2014-2015 Including the Annual Report and Financial Statements THE DUKE OF EDINBURGH’S AWARD Contents Overview .................................................................... 3 Thank you to all our supporters .................................. 4 Our Licensed Organisation partners ............................ 6 Chairman’s Report .................................................... 10 Our strategic objectives ............................................ 12 Supporting DofE delivery .......................................... 13 Extending the reach .................................................. 13 Driving achievement ................................................. 13 Fuelling growth ......................................................... 15 Financial performance .............................................. 16 Funding the DofE ...................................................... 18 Trustees’ commitment .............................................. 19 Thank you ................................................................ 19 Independent Auditors’ Report ................................... 20 Statutory accounts ................................................... 22 Appendices .............................................................. 42 Trustees .................................................................... 49 The Trustees present their report and the financial statements of the Royal Charter Corporation for the year ended 31 March 2015. In preparing this report the
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St
    Locality Church Name Parish County Diocese Date Grant reason ACCRINGTON School Chapel ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1874-1876 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Mary Magdalene ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1897-1904 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Paul, Barnfield ACCRINGTON, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church ACCRINGTON St. Peter ACCRINGTON, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1885-1889 New Church ALTHAM St. James ALTHAM Lancashire Manchester 1858-1859 Enlargement ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE Christ Church ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, Christ Church Lancashire Manchester 1858-1860 Repairs ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE St. Peter ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, St. Peter Lancashire Manchester 1934-1935 Repairs AUDENSHAW St. Hilda AUDENSHAW, St. Hilda Lancashire Manchester 1936-1938 New Church BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1854-1874 Rebuild BACUP St. John the Evangelist BACUP, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1878-1884 Rebuild BAMBER BRIDGE St. Saviour BAMBER BRIDGE Lancashire Manchester 1869-1870 Enlargement BARROW-IN-FURNESS Mission Church WHALLEY, St. Mary Lancashire Manchester 1891 New Church BELFIELD St. Anne MILNROW, St. James Lancashire Manchester 1911-1913 New Church BENCHILL St. Luke the Physician BENCHILL Lancashire Manchester 1937-1939 New Church BIRCH St. Mary BIRCH Lancashire Manchester 1951-1952 Repairs BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD St. Michael, Bamford BIRTLE CUM BAMFORD, St. Michael, Bamford Lancashire Manchester 1883-1885 New Church BLACKBURN Mission Church BLACKBURN, All Saints Lancashire Manchester 1881 New Church BLACKBURN School Chapel BLACKBURN, St. Paul Lancashire Manchester 1876 Other BLACKBURN St. Bartholomew, Ewood LIVESEY, St. Andrew Lancashire Manchester 1908-1911 New Church BLACKBURN St. James BLACKBURN, St. John the Evangelist Lancashire Manchester 1872-1874 New Church BLACKBURN St.
    [Show full text]