DOCSLIB.ORG

Succeeds Crerar As Progressive Leader Honorable 1. L Crerar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Succeeds Crerar As Progressive Leader Honorable 1. L Crerar Sworn Circulation SwornXirculationt 2,000 iTn"N"' RRY NEWS 2,000 VOL. XXX No. .44 ALEXANDRIA, ON«telO, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17. 1922 $2.00 A YEAR I tiou of the tar the platform in agriculture and other natural re- jgre-sives from Provinces represented Hymeneal. Succeeds Crerar as Honorable 1. L Crerar Resigns should declare principles rather sources should be given especially j strongly by Progressives in the ■than a.tempt to^ aft a tariff sche- low rat-S of duties, or, indeed, plac- • House that the leaders should hon- 'MacCUAlG — MacCUAIG dule. |ed on the free list al’together. The ^estly explore the matter further, The marriage took place at the Progressive Leader Leadersbip of Progressives I * R-g. rd must- ^had, tod, to the j need of a sound financial policy for* with a view to ascertaining what ' home of . the bride, Kirk Hill, ow ! charig s that ha^ taken place in I Canada is as great as ever. possibilities lay in Tt. This, to some m.nt. The a’:surdity of the thing re- I Wednesday, October 18th, by the The policy of “broadening out” In an earnest valedictoiy present- the last eight (,’anada is I OTTAWA NEEDS HOUSE-CLEAN- degree, was done, though not on'my Rev. P. Matheson, of Sadie Christy had its way in the caucus of Pro- ed to the Progressive members in quires no further comment. ^ marching foi’wat part we play- ! ING, initiative, nor, I may add, on the “Those m'sconceptions, and I be- MacCuaig, only daughter of the late gressive parliamentarians which was convention assembled at Winnipeg, i cd in the war ^ÿmade it forever j "There should be a complete and initiative of Mr. King, but the mat- Lj. M. MacCuaig Esq., and Mrs.; concluded ^t Winnipeg, Saturday on Friday of last week, Hon. T.' A. lieve they are invariably honest, * imuos.sible th..t count'-y Ci\n : UioroUgh overhauling of the Govern- I ter did not reach the position where ; MacCuaig, Kirk HUl, to Alexandett night with the élection of Robert Crerar who so ably lead ^at party arise fr-m a misunderstanding of the lor.g.r ! e r gard in any s.nse ;ir.e.‘t administrati\e services. Econo- ' the public interest could be benefi- functions of a m mber of Parlia- Di.nraii MacCuaig, son of Mr. and^ Forke as leader to succeed Hon. T. during the past SLSsion of the whate’' er in the Ph-ial status as mies must be introduced in all de- cially Served by any public state- ment. In the f r. t place a member of ' Mrs. D. R. MacCuaig, Kirk Hill,* A. Crerar, and w th the addition of House of Commons announced his far as its relatiq ^with Great Bri- partments of public expenditure,* j meat. At no time, "by myself or any Parliament is not a delegate from Ont. ' , an expression of opinion that the resignation of that important post tain are concern^ hcar a good Federal and elsewhere, that w'ill ^ other Progressive, so far as I know, his constituency to act only when progressive movement “ is big en- and dealt with the past and present deal of talk thé pays that Can- ; bring al-out a reduction in the needs ; was any fusion with any party in I 1 — someone in it pulls the strings. He ough to include men and women of from a Progressive standpoint ad- ada is a nition S pin the Empire, of revenue and the consequent re- I the House considered. What was dis- Bainsvihe vancing the policy of “ Nation is a repr.'S n‘ative, and if his duty common Ideals from all walks of life I or within the L commonwealth Iduciion in taxation that can fol- jeus ed was whether or not, in the Duck shooting season is about is properly dis harged he must act anc^ that stej s should be taken First" decrying the "Class" ideas j of nations, whicjfl I'.comlng to be |low, otherwise the country is pro- j light of experience of the session, over. There were plenty of birds and for, not only his own constituency, whereby practical expression can be of Morrison and Wood and urg- iregarded as ^accurate term. Ike ding under a strangle-hold that it ■ basis for an honorable co-operation excellent sport. but for the whole Dominion, m the given to these ideals." Mr. Forke, ing a broad.r vision. The Oi/ening j That relationshi;^ Epuld be clearly j cannot overcome. , CO Id be reach.d that would enable Barton and Duncan McCuaig ^ of paragrai hs are devoted to the fact innumerable mutters that come be- ailiament to deal effectively with McGill Univeisity, spent a f©w days member for Brandon and sitting in defined, and defitt f;Ly the Cana- j “The improvement in the situa- that busin S3 and politics do not fore Pnrliam nt for its considera- ^ many matters of public policy that the House of Commons for his first dian Pi'rdamrnt.^5 ' tion of the National Railways gives with their parents here. mix and having previoùsly given his tion. ware considered essential and neces-, term, is described as a “moderate." [LAUDS GOVERî! |ET’S STAND. ' good }>romise that these roads will Dr. McCuaig and Mrs. McCuaig of promise he must now devote his EACH REPRESENTS ALL. sary fpr the countiy at the pr«,sent Burwash, Ont., were recent guests He was elected over J. T. Shaw of ' ‘ The TurkrSh &t:on of a few : in a few years emerge from their time to the inleivs.s of the Grain I "Nor dees he represent only one time. Calgary, in a secret ballot after R. ' wcel s ago was ] feathin a hair’s ? : difiicuUie.5. I have long advocated cf his parents here. Growers. He abo advanced several class in his constituency; conse- After spending a few days at their A. Hoey 6f Springfield had positive- i E-refiCdth of invol^ ^Britain in an- 'that the National Railway . sj’stem "It is interesting to note that the pcrtinei'.t reasons why he should ad- ' qiiently he is the repre.>entative, not public discussion of any proposal parental homes here the Misses Lola’ ly declined the nomination. other war. Had. ^ocmiiTcd a sit- : should 1 e revalued and a fair op- f here to h s deebion to withdraw of the farmer or the labor man, or : for closer co-operation along the 'nation would ha once develop- iportunily given to the management McCuaig and Eileen McEvay have from the Icad.rshi]). the bus'ne. s m. n or the profession- i cd in Canada ^‘the question of j to ma^ e good on a fair basis of ca- j linos I have indicated is opposed returned to the Ottawa Ladies Col« His retention ot the leadership he al m n, but of all. Those among strongly, on the 6ne hand, by a' ' peace or war for| ttada would have I pitali/ation. The time is opportune lege. Ihe Ingleneuk stated woL'ld have depended upon a our fri iids, th.n, who hope'to ex- |sma:i but powerful reactionary ele- Miss Ethel Sangster of Montreal ' again be.n discu IJin'every Cana- j to do that now, when a now board clear understanding and statement ert a pol tical iuMuonce in the coun- ment in the Liberal party that to- s ent the we.>k end with her par-i ' d an household, ppears Certain ’ and DOW mgnagement are assuming (By G. Walt Smith M,A.) of the Progressive programme. He try for t’e countiT’s good and hang- day appears to he the special custo- eats here. that there will êdebaie in Par- I control. The National Railways THE LIVING WAY is oppo.ed to rigid restriction of out the sign,. ‘None but farmers need d an for the time being of the wel- . The three large bridges on. thd Lament at the hg session on ,j must have a full and fair trial, and membership in the party to farmers, apply,' are doing, unwittingly, not fare of privileged interests, and on Front road have been . completed.! In days gone bye the argument j this question, aij have no hesita- I if they are given this there ik no which he believes to be bad, not only a di-ss?rvice to their country Trey are fine structures «lotwith-^ tor the ex stence for God was often t on in saying l| jtiie action of j question of their success. There is the other'hand by many supporters only for the country but for the as a whale, but an injury in the ! of the Progressive cause who 'rom standing their cost. stated in terms af mechanics. If i the Government fDlinmg to com- no r ason why they should not be- very class which the movement was ' long run to the very pe ople whom honest, but I. belie e mistaken, mo-| Most of the farmershave finished any one walked along the seashore 'mit Canada; unt;i^ jlian'ent had I come a gre.it unifying influence in created to assist. All wha believe in they most desire to help. ' Such a tivos are looking more at the in- ploughing. A large acreage has been’ a.nd fourd a watch which was go- expressed its: if he only wise j Canada, affording a common bond Progressive principles, he says, course, whi e n. t, I am sure, so tere-t of their group or their »das4 ploughed owing to the fine fall, ing and was therefore measuring 'and so nd policy ïoilow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A THREAT to LEADERSHIP: C.A.Dunning and Mackenzie King
    S. Peter Regenstreif A THREAT TO LEADERSHIP: C.A.Dunning and Mackenzie King BY Now mE STORY of the Progressive revolt and its impact on the Canadian national party system during the 1920's is well documented and known. Various studies, from the pioneering effort of W. L. Morton1 over a decade ago to the second volume of the Mackenzie King official biography2 which has recently appeared, have dealt intensively with the social and economic bases of the movement, the attitudes of its leaders to the institutions and practices of national politics, and the behaviour of its representatives once they arrived in Ottawa. Particularly in biographical analyses, 3 a great deal of attention has also been given to the response of the established leaders and parties to this disrupting influence. It is clearly accepted that the roots of the subsequent multi-party situation in Canada can be traced directly to a specific strain of thought and action underlying the Progressivism of that era. At another level, however, the abatement of the Pro~ gressive tide and the manner of its dispersal by the end of the twenties form the basis for an important piece of Canadian political lore: it is the conventional wisdom that, in his masterful handling of the Progressives, Mackenzie King knew exactly where he was going and that, at all times, matters were under his complete control, much as if the other actors in the play were mere marionettes with King the manipu­ lator. His official biographers have demonstrated just how illusory this conception is and there is little to be added to their efforts on this score.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR FIRST OLD AGE PENSION 1915-1927 Summary
    OUR FIRST OLD AGE PENSION 1915-1927 Summary Canada was a changed nation by the end of the First World War (1914-1918). War-time demand led to more industrial production. The urban labour force grew, so that by the 1920s most people lived in the city rather than the country. New factories favoured the young, and jobs that were traditionally done by older people began to disappear. Seniors could look forward to living longer, but many lived in severe poverty. Workers who supported aging parents had a hard time saving for their own old age. Survivor and disability pensions were created for war veterans and their families, but there was still a strong and growing need for a national old age pension system. The Government Annuities plan of 19081 was not the answer since few people could afford them. So in the 1920s, the issue of government assistance for the elderly was back on the political agenda. In 1924, Parliament appointed a special committee to study the question of pensions. Political advocates like James S. Woodsworth and Abraham A. Heaps argued for a national pension scheme. When his government finally won a majority in 1926, Mackenzie King followed up on his promise to Woodsworth and Heaps by introducing legislation that became the Old Age Pensions Act in 1927. In 1927, Canada’s first Old Age Pensions Act was passed: · The maximum pension was $20 per month or $240 per year. · It was available to British subjects aged 70 or over who had lived in Canada for 20 years. 1 Government Annuities: The Canadian Government Annuities Act of 1908 was one of the earliest significant pieces of social legislation in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Migration
    RESTOCKING THE BRITISH WORLD: EMPIRE MIGRATION AND ANGLO-CANADIAN RELATIONS, 1919-30* Canada is a land flowing with milk and honey for all men and women able and willing to work. People from these [British Isles] are sure of a warm reception and a happy home. Sir Wilfrid Laurier’s prophesy that the twentieth century belongs to Canada will be fulfilled. Peter Larkin, Canadian High Commissioner in London1 Throughout the 1920s Canadian politicians, immigration officials, eugenicists, educationalists, and political commentators talked about the need to ‘Canadianize’ all immigrants who arrived in the dominion, including those from the ‘mother country’. However, this did not mean that Ottawa was out to ‘de-Britannicize’ those arriving from the United Kingdom. British migrants, a crucial component that underpinned Canada’s cultural identity at this time, were given preferred status because their common heritage and shared cultural values mirrored those of most Anglo-Canadians. Indeed, ‘Britishness’ made up the bedrock of Anglo-Canadian ‘national’ identity. Therefore, at one level British migrants were seen as less problematic and easier to acculturate to the Canadian way of life because for many Canadians being British and Canadian were one and the same. As Alan Sears has argued, the crux of the problem in ‘forging a “national people” [hinged on] defining some people as more naturally Canadian (or capable of becoming Canadian) than others’.2 However, the development of a ‘national people’ was not an attempt by Canada to break the bonds 1 of empire. Carl Berger reminded us long ago far from being incompatible the development of Canadian nationalism was premised upon it being nurtured within an imperial framework.3 Put another way, the ‘highest level of citizenship’, according to Barbara Roberts, ‘was based on love and loyalty to Canada and to the British Empire; the two were inseparable’.4 Assimilation was another matter.
    [Show full text]
  • William Lyon Mackenzie King Collection
    William Lyon Mackenzie King Collection Extent : 36.5 cm of textual records 12 photographs Date : 1899-1999 1 King / Bezeau papers 1.1 Books and pamphlets authored by William Lyon Mackenzie King 1.1.1 The secret of heroism : a memoir of Henry Albert Harper. New York : F.H. Revell Co., 1906 RARE BOOK FC 27 H3K5 Author‟s autograph : To - C.M. Bezeau, Oct. 1908 1.1.2 Losses sustained by the Japanese population of Vancouver, B.C. on the occasion of the riots of that city in Sept., 1907 : report / William Lyon Mackenzie King. Canada. Dept. of Labour. Ottawa : S.E. Dawson, Printer to the King, 1908 RARE BOOK FC 3847.9 J3C3 1.1.3 Industry and humanity : a study in the principles underlying industrial reconstruction. Toronto : Thomas Allen, 1918 RARE BOOK HD 45 K54 Author‟s autograph : To - C.M. Bezeau, Xmas 1918 1.1.4 The four parties to industry : address before the Empire Club of Canada at the King Edward Hotel, Toronto March 13th, 1919. Toronto : Hunter Rose, 1919 RARE BOOK HD 8106 K53 1.1.5 The Liberal Party and the tariff : a review of the 1924 budget proposals and principles underlying Liberal policy / by the Right Honourable W.L. Mackenzie King. A speech delivered to the leader of the opposition in the debate on the budget, House of Commons, May 15, 1924 RARE BOOK HJ 793 K5 1.1.6 The message of the carillon, and other addresses / by The Right Honourable W.L. MacKenzie King. Toronto : MacMillan, 1927 RARE BOOK FC 60 K5 Author‟s autograph : To - C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rt. Hon. W.L. M. King Mg 26, J 2 Prime Ministers Office Series
    Manuscript Division des Division manuscrits RT. HON. W.L. M. KING MG 26, J 2 PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE SERIES Finding Aid No. 502 / Instrument de recherche no 502 Prepared by Margaret Rowden Préparé par Margaret Rowden en in 1979 and rivised in 2001. 1979 et révisé en 2001. -ii- NOTES 1. This series consists of the subject files remaining after the Primary Series Correspondence and the Memoranda and Notes Series were selected. A list of file titles is available in the Prime Ministers Archives. 2. Researchers wishing to use this series are requested to order material by volume number preceded by the designation MG 26, J2. 3. This series has not been microfilmed. 4. Finding aids to other series in the King Papers are available in the Reference Room and the Prime Ministers Archives. -iii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. Prime Ministers Office, 1922-1930 - Volumes 1-62 .......................... 1-78 2. Prime Ministers Office, 1935-1945 - Volumes 63-384 ...................... 79-366 3. Prime Ministers Office, 1945-1948 - Volumes 385-520 .................... 367-487 PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE SERIES (1922-1930, 1935-1945, 1945-1948) Vols. 1-520 Vol. File Subject Date 1 A-1000-C Agriculture 1925 1 A-1000W Agriculture 1928 1 A-1003 Agriculture - Poultry 1926 1 A-1008 Agriculture - United Farmers of Canada 1927-1930 1 A-1008-A Agriculture - United Farmers of Canada 1927 1 B-1008-Mc Biographical Material - Rt. Hon. J. Ramsay MacDonald 1928-1930 1 C-1000 Civil Service 1922-1929 1 C-1003 Civil Service 1922 1 C-1005 Civil Service - Naval Defence 1922 1 C-1200 Customs 1923 1 C-1200 Customs 1924 1 C-1200 Customs - Smuggling of Goods (v.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginalising the Upper House: the Liberal Party, the Senate And
    13 Marginalising the upper house The Liberal Party, the Senate and democratic reform in 1920s Canada Adam Coombs Introduction Canadian voters in the 1921 Federal Election produced one of the most unex­ pected Parliaments in Canadian history. The incumbent Conservative Party, which had governed for the past ten years and seen Canada through the First World War, was now the third party in the House of Commons, and a combina­ tion of electoral defeats and retirements left it bereft of almost all of their senior leadership. As a final insult to the party, its new leader, Arthur Meighen, even lost his riding in Portage-Le-Prairie, Manitoba, to the newly formed Progressive Party. It was this Progressive Party, a collection of rural parliamentarians united under the informal leadership of Thomas Crerar, a former minister in the Conservative’s wartime government, which was now the second largest party in lower chamber. The Progressives’ rapid rise had only begun two years earlier when a group of angry farmers ran a candidate in an Ontario by-election to protest the Conserva­ tive’s support for high tariffs on imported goods. Now this grassroots movement was the official opposition. Most surprising of all was that the Liberal Party, now led by William Lyon Mac­ kenzie King, had secured the majority of seats in the Commons. Having refused to support conscription in 1917, the Liberal caucus was reduced to a rump of Quebec members led by former prime minister Sir Wilfrid Laurier. By 1919 Laurier had died and King, a unilingual Anglophone who had spent the war working with the Rockefeller family in the USA, was elected leader of the Francophone-dominated party.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Party Switchers
    A Note on Party Switchers by Professor Desmond Morton Recent high profile examples of Members of Parliament who have changed parties has raised a number of questions about the frequency of such behaviour as well as political and ethical questions. This article is based on a study, originally prepared for the Office of the House of Commons Ethics Commission in August 2005. It is reproduced by permission of the author and the Office of the Ethics Commissioner. he institution of political parties, with their CCF and Reform-Canadian Alliance have had more unifying discipline, makes possible Canada’s switchers over the period studied (1921-2005) than the Tversion of parliamentary government. It is the two traditional Canadian parties. Does it take more “dis- logical, even inevitable, result of our nineteenth century cipline” to be undisciplined? In the atmosphere of the belief in “responsible government”. It fulfils our post-1993 election, the decision by the Chrétien Liberals constitutional goal of “Peace”, and “Order”, though its to ignore their promise to repeal the Goods and Services critics may deny that it also guarantees “Good Tax, justified York South-Weston MP John Nunziata to Government”. Still, most Canadians regularly vote against his party in the full knowledge that he demonstrate a commitment to stability in government, would be suspended from his party’s caucus. He was while achieving, as Professor David Docherty has joined, afterwards, by Dennis Mills who quietly resigned observed, a notable instability in parliamentary the Liberal whip to share in the protest, though he re- representation.1 turned to his party caucus soon after.3 Party Discipline in Canada Sheila Copps adopted a different, braver and much more costly strategy by resigning her seat and winning Canadian party discipline is, of course, a contrast to the re-election in her riding of Hamilton East.
    [Show full text]
  • Whence They Came Deportation from Canada 1900-1935
    WhencelheyCame This page intentionally left blank Whence They Came Deportation from Canada 1900-1935 Barbara Roberts Foreword by Irving Abella University of Ottawa Press © University of Ottawa, 1988 Printed and bound in Canada ISBN 0-7766-0163-6 UN1VERSITE D'OTTAWA UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Roberts, Barbara Ann Whence they came: deportation from Canada, 1900-1935 Bibliography: p. ISBN 0-7766-0163-6 1. Deportation-Canada-History. 2. Canada-Emigration and immigration-Government policy-History. I. Title. JV7253.R62 1988 364.6'8 C88-090318-X Typeset in Caxton Book by Nancy Poirier Typesetting Limited Printed and bound by D.W. Friesen, Altona, Manitoba Design by Chris Jackson, Ottawa This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. CONTENTS FOREWORD Vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Xi 1 The Functions of Deportation 1 2 The Law and Deportation 11 3 Incidence and Patterns of Deportation 37 4 Developing the System, 18 90s-1920 53 5 The Alien Bolshevik Menace, 1910-1920s 71 6 The Bureaucracy Matures, 1920s-1935 99 7 Troublemakers and Communists, 1930-1935 125 8 "Shovelling Out" the Redundant, 1930-1935 159 9 "Purely Administrative Proceedings" 195 NOTES 203 APPENDIX Ministers Responsible for Immigration, 1867-1936 235 BIBLIOGRAPHY 237 This page intentionally left blank FOREWORD Canada is a peculiar nation. Peopled by immigrants, it is a country, paradoxically, which hates immigration. Every single public opinion survey over the past fifty years indicates that most Canadians - including by the way, most immigrants themselves - do not want any substantial increase in the number of people admitted to this country.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRIVY COUNCIL 65 3.—Members of the King's Privy
    THE PRIVY COUNCIL 65 3.—Members of the King's Privy Council for the Dominion of Canada, According to Seniority Therein,' as at Dec. 31,1931. NOTE.—In this list the prefix Rt. Hon. indicates membership in the British Privy Council. Besides those mentioned in this list, the Rt. Hon. F. A. Anglin, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Rt. Hon. L. P. Duff, Justice of the Supreme Court, are Canadian members of the British Privy Council. Date when Date when Name. Sworn In. Name. Sworn In. The Rt. Hon. Sir William Mulock.. July 13 1896 The Hon. James Murdock Dec. 29, 1921 The Rt. Hon. Sir Charles Fitz- The Hon. John Ewan Sinclair... Dec. 30, 1921 patrick 5 Feb. 11 1902 The Hon. James H. King Feb. 3, 1922 The Hon. N. A. Belcourt Jan. 12 1905 The Hon. Edward Mortimer Mac- The Hon. F. Oliver Apri] 8 1906 donald April 12, 1923 The Hon. Sir A. B. Aylesworth.... Oct. 16 1905 The Hon. Edward James McMurray Nov. 14, 1923 The Hon. Rodolphe Lemieux June 4 1906 The Hon. Pierre Joseph Arthur Car- The Rt. Hon. George P. Graham.. Aug. 30 1907 din Jan. 30, 1924 The Hon. Charles Murphy Oct. 5 1908 The Hon. Frederic Liguori Beique. May 20, 1925 The Hon. R. Dandurand Jan. 20 1909 The Hon. George Newcombe Gor­ The Rt. Hon. W. L. Mackenzie don Sept. 7, 1925 King* June 2 1909 The Hon. Herbert Marler* Sept. 9, 1925 The Hon. CharleB Marcil Oct. 6 1911 The Hon. Charles Vincent MaBsey. Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SENATE APPOINTMENTS of R. B. BENNETT 1930 to 1935 By
    THE SENATE APPOINTMENTS OF R. B. BENNETT 1930 to 1935 by IRENE H. MCEWEN B.A. Honors, Carleton University, 1970 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History, University of British Columb We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 19/8 © Irene H. McEwen, 1978 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of History The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date 6 October 1978 ABSTRACT Research in the R. B. Bennett Papers several years ago uncovered the very serious controvery which had surrounded the appointment of Sask• atchewan Senator Arthur Marcotte and led to the publication of an article entitled, "Religious and Racial Influences on a Senate Appointment, 1931." The question arose as to whether that case was an isolated one or whether there were other Senate appointments equally troublesome to Bennett during his tenure as Prime Minister of Canada from 1930 to 1935. This thesis proposes to answer that question by exploring in detail the circumstances surrounding all thirty-three of Bennett's appointments.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    THE FORGOTTEN CONSTITUTION 999 THE FORGOTTEN CONSTITUTION: THE NATURAL RESOURCES TRANSFER AGREEMENTS AND INDIAN LIVELIHOOD RIGHTS, CA.1925-1933 FRANK J. TOUGH• 711isarticle forms Part I of a two part legal-historical Cet article represente la premiere de deux parties analysis of the Natural ResourcesTranster Agreement d'une analyse historico-legale de la Conventionsur le (NRTA), the processes and circumstances that gave transfort des ressources naturellcs; el/e porte sur /es rise to its enactment, and the subsequent implications processm et /es circonstances qui ont donne lieu it sa ·· --historical and contemporary--for the livelihood promulgation et aux implications ulterieures rights of Aboriginal peoples. In this Part, the author historiques et contemporaines ·· sur /es droits de critically examines historical evidence surrounding suhsistance des Autochtones. Dans cette premiere the agreements that the Prairie Provinces of Alberta, par lie, /'auteur examine. d 'unpoint de vue critique, la Manitoba, and Saskatchewan entered into with the preuve historique entourant /es ententes que /es Dominion government. In doing so, the author provinces des Prairies. it savoir /'Alberta, le concludes that. to date. legal interpretations of the Manitoba et la Saskatchewan. on/ conclu avec le NRTA and the respective provincial agreements have gouverneme/11du Dominion. En ce faisant. / 'auteur been short-sighted and incomplete. As such. they are conclut qu 'it cejour, /es interpretationsjuridiques de deeply troubling and represent a site for further la Conventionsur le transfort des ressourcesnaturelles critical legal analysis and judicial reconsideration. et /es ententes provincia/es respectives sont incompletes et imprevoyantes. Elles sont inquietantes et devraientfaire / 'objet d'une analyse legate critique plus approfondie et d'1me reconsiderationjuridique.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Robson As Manitoba Liberal Leader, 1927–1929
    The Failure of Liberal Reform: Hugh Robson as Manitoba Liberal Leader, 1927–1929 BARRY FERGUSON* n an era of tumultuous changes to the party system, Hugh Robson led the Manitoba Liberals from March 1927 to January 1930. The issues he dealt I with were not just staple questions like provincial rights, economic development and social policy, but also critical matters regarding partisan alignments and the relations between provincial and federal party branches. These were important issues in the inter-war decades and are recurring themes in party politics. A focus on Robson as a politician is a study of his experience with crucial aspects of party politics in the early 20th century. Several important studies of the inter-war period have examined the transformation of party politics and the difficulties experienced by the Liberals throughout the Prairies. Focussed on the promise and failures of political party and policy transformation, including the eclipse of Manitoba Liberals, these works have overlooked Hugh Robson’s own agenda and the possibility that the Manitoba Liberals might have survived the 1920s as an autonomous and positive force.1 A full interpretation of Robson is hindered by the absence of his personal papers, but a careful reading of other personal papers and * Barry Ferguson is the Duff Roblin Professor of Government at the University of Manitoba. Professor Ferguson teaches primarily in the areas of history and political studies, and received his Ph.D. from York University. 1 W L Morton, Manitoba: A History, 2nd edition
    [Show full text]