Durham E-Theses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses The role of the Persian Gulf's natural gas reserves for the European Union's energy security HOUSHIALSADAT, SEYED MOHAMMAD How to cite: HOUSHIALSADAT, SEYED MOHAMMAD (2013) The role of the Persian Gulf's natural gas reserves for the European Union's energy security , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7751/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The role of the Persian Gulf’s natural gas reserves for the European Union’s energy security Seyed Mohammad Houshialsadat A Doctoral Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Doctor of Philosophy at Durham University Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies School of Government and International Affairs Durham University England 2013 i In the Name of God the Compassionate the Merciful This manuscript is dedicated to: The Gracious Imam Reza (Peace be upon to him) And The universal Saviour Imam Mahdi (May Allah hasten his reappearance) ii Abstract Energy, as a matter of security, is the major challenge during the 21st century. The energy mix in the world will change in the future, predominantly to renewable energy sources, followed by natural gas. Nevertheless, the latter will act as the bridge for the transitional era to the non–hydrocarbon period. The EU will be the foremost gas importer by 2030 and the rate of LNG imports will double by 2020. The UK, France, Spain and Italy are the main EU entries for LNG imports and approximately 80% of the regional terminals are located in these countries importing 87% of the Union LNG needs. Obviously, the mentioned EU member states will be more influential for the regional energy security in the future. Diversification of LNG routes and suppliers is an important objective in the EU’s energy policy and its security of supply. For this reason, it has already been at the top of the EU’s agenda. The Persian Gulf, as the gas richest area worldwide, holds 40% of global gas reserves. Iran and Qatar, as the potential and actual LNG suppliers, embrace nearly 30% global gas deposits or 75% of Middle East reserves. So, this low–cost/ high–risk region could be influential on the EU’s energy security in the future. Therefore, in the current multi–level analysis consisting of the EU and the Persian Gulf, as the macro and micro levels, the role of the natural gas within the Persian Gulf for the energy security of the EU will be examined. The research, furthermore, aims to analyse the role of the actual Qatari LNG and potential Iranian LNG on the UK, France, Spain and Italy in the future. This multiple–case study centres on a comparison of different actual and potential LNG suppliers towards the EU, on the basis of testing the four indicators of the energy security, comprising acceptability, availability, affordability, and accessibility. It will finally to determine the position of the Persian Gulf and its main regional LNG suppliers in the future amongst the main global exporters. iii Positioned in the intersection of the Persian Gulf and the EU, the existing dissertation pursues a multi–level explanation and analysis of energy–related issues of the both regions and their case–studies domestically, regionally and to lesser extent globally. In parallel, the study is a detailed examination of the emerging gas and LNG– related challenges and vulnerabilities in addition to investigate the security of LNG supply–related issues, approaches, and policies of the EU and the main suppliers, particularly within the Persian Gulf. iv Table of Contents Dedication ii Abstract iii Table of Contents v List of figures xi List of tables xiv List of maps xv List of Abbreviations xvi Declaration xvii Statement of Copyright xviii Acknowledgement xix Introduction 1 Research Question(s) 4 Research Hypothesis 5 Methodology, Research Methods and Data Analysis 6 Ethics in the research 9 Original Contribution(s) 11 Value of the work 14 The structure of the thesis 16 Chapter 1: Comprehensive literature review, terminology of the energy security 20 and the theoretical frameworks 1.1. Comprehensive literature review 20 1.1.1. Initial Dip and General Literature Review 21 1.1.2. Critical Literature Review 24 1.2. Terminology of the energy security 41 1.3. Theoretical Frameworks 51 v Chapter 2: The EU energy matters 59 2.1. Introduction 59 2.2. European Energy Background 62 2.3. The EU’s Energy Policy 64 2.4. The EU’s energy mix 67 2.5. Geo–politics of the EU’s indigenous natural gas 79 2.6. The EU’s natural gas demand–supply gap in the future 83 2.7. Various external gas routes toward the EU 92 2.7.1. External gas pipelines toward the EU 94 2.7.2. External LNG routes toward the EU 99 2.8. The EU’s Challenges on natural gas and LNG imports 103 2.9. The four EU’s Case Studies regarding the natural gas and LNG 106 2.9.1. The UK as the first Case Study 106 2.9.1.1. Geo–politics of the UK 106 2.9.1.2. The UK’s energy policy and energy security 106 2.9.1.3. Geo–politics of natural gas and pipelines in the UK 108 2.9.1.4. Total primary energy sources demand and production, past, now and the 111 future 2.9.1.5. The UK, as the leading LNG importer? 114 2.9.2. Italy as the second Case Study 119 2.9.2.1. Geo–politics of Italy 119 2.9.2.2. Italy’s energy policy and energy security 119 2.9.2.3. Geo–politics of natural gas in Italy 119 2.9.2.4. Total primary energy sources demand and production, past, now and the 120 future 2.9.2.5. The Italy’s gas pipelines and LNG projects 122 vi 2.9.2.6. The Italian LNG projects for the future 123 2.9.3. Spain as the third Case Study 127 2.9.3.1. Geo–politics of Spain 127 2.9.3.2. Spain’s energy policy and energy security 127 2.9.3.3. Total primary energy sources demand and production, past, present, and 128 the future in Spain 2.9.3.4. Spain’s gas imports by pipelines and LNG outlook 131 2.9.4. France as the fourth Case Study 135 2.9.4.1. Geo–politics of France 135 2.9.4.2. France’s energy policy and energy security 135 2.9.4.3. Total primary energy sources demand and production in France, past, 137 present, and the future 2.9.4.4. France’s LNG import and its outlook 138 2.10. Perspective of the EU–4 LNG importer 141 2.11. Conclusion 146 Chapter 3: Energy geo–politics of the Persian Gulf’s and the regional security 152 systems 3.1. Introduction 152 3.2. Geo–politics of the Persian Gulf and the presence of the powers 154 3.3. The Persian Gulf’s position after the discovery of hydrocarbons 155 3.3.1 More attention towards the Persian Gulf 155 3.3.2. Regional Delineation 157 3.4. The end of status quo in the Persian Gulf 157 3.4.1. Differences inside the GCC 158 3.4.1.1. Boundary and political disputes 158 3.4.2. Differences between the GCC and Iran 159 3.4.2.1. Regional penetration 160 vii 3.4.2.2. Iran’s nuclear issue 160 3.5. The current security model in the Persian Gulf 162 3.6. The appropriate security model for the Persian Gulf 163 3.7. Conclusion 168 Chapter 4: Geo–politics of natural gas within the Persian Gulf and two case 171 studies 4.1. Introduction 171 4.2. Geo–politics of natural gas in the Persian Gulf 173 4.2.1 Unconventional gas as a rival for Persian Gulf’s conventional gas 175 4.2.2 Comparison of different regions within the World’s natural gas and LNG 180 outlook 4.2.3. Persian Gulf, as the least expensive and largest natural gas region 184 4.2.4. Gas plans within the Persian Gulf states, excluding Iran and Qatar 185 4.2.5. Persian Gulf’s challenges against its natural gas outlook 188 4.3 Geo–politics of natural gas in Islamic Republic of Iran 190 4.3.1. Islamic Republic of Iran’s regional pipeline projects 193 4.3.2. Islamic Republic of Iran’s Grand Energy Outlook Document by 1404/2023 199 4.3.3. LNG projects in Islamic Republic of Iran 201 4.3.4. Islamic Republic of Iran’s main obstacles against its piped gas and LNG 204 targets by 2023 4.3.5. Islamic Republic of Iran’s three major scenarios regarding the two 208 impediments 4.3.6.
Recommended publications
  • Uk Energy Storage Research Capability Document Capturing the Energy Storage Academic Research Landscape
    UK ENERGY STORAGE RESEARCH CAPABILITY DOCUMENT CAPTURING THE ENERGY STORAGE ACADEMIC RESEARCH LANDSCAPE June 2016 CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER INTRODUCTION 5 BIOGRAPHIES Dr Ainara Aguadero, Imperial College 10 Dr Maria Alfredsson, Kent 11 Dr Daniel Auger, Cranfield 12 Dr Audrius Bagdanavicius, Leicester 13 Prof Philip Bartlett, Southampton 14 Dr Léonard Berlouis, Strathclyde 15 Dr Rohit Bhagat, Warwick 16 Dr Nuno Bimbo, Lancaster 17 Dr Frédéric Blanc, Liverpool 18 Prof Nigel Brandon, Imperial College 19 Dr Dan Brett, UCL 20 Prof Peter Bruce, Oxford 21 Dr Jonathan Busby, British Geological Survey 22 Dr Qiong Cai, Surrey 23 Prof George Chen, Nottigham 24 Prof Rui Chen, Loughborough 25 Prof Simon Clarke, Oxford 26 Dr Liana Cipcigan, Cardiff 27 Dr Paul Alexander Connor, St Andrews 28 Dr Serena Corr, Glasgow 29 Prof Bob Critoph, Warwick 30 Prof Andrew Cruden, Southampton 31 Dr Eddie Cussen, Strathclyde 32 Prof Jawwad Darr, UCL 33 Dr Prodip Das, Newcastle 34 Dr Chris Dent, Durham 35 Prof Yulong Ding, Birmingham 36 Prof Robert Dryfe, Manchester 37 Prof Stephen Duncan, Oxford 38 Dr Siân Dutton, Cambridge 39 Dr David Evans, British Geological Survey 40 Prof Stephen Fletcher, Loughborough 41 3 UK Energy Superstore Research Capability Document CONTENTS CONTENTS Dr Rupert Gammon, De Montfort University 42 Dr Nuria Garcia-Araez, Southampton 43 Prof Seamus Garvey, Nottingham 44 Dr Monica Giulietti, Cambridge 45 Prof Bartek A. Glowacki, Cambridge 46 Prof David Grant, Nottingham 47 Prof Patrick Grant, Oxford 48 Prof Richard Green, Imperial College 49
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Energy Institute (PEG0170)
    Written evidence submitted by Durham Energy Institute (PEG0170) Durham Energy Institute (DEI) is the hub of energy research at Durham University with over 100 active energy researchers. It unlocks research synergies between different disciplines and sectors to tackle the energy demands of the future. Producing world class research for understanding energy decarbonisation issues across science and society and delivering integrated and equitable solutions for the climate emergency and our net-zero ambitions. For more information about Durham Energy Institute visit: www.durham.ac.uk/dei/research Summary of key points in document and answer to question 1: What core/guiding principles should the Government adopt/prioritise in its recovery package, and why? 1. The guiding Principles the Government should prioritise are: a) Prioritising investment in zero-carbon opportunities for a green recovery to create green jobs, address climate change, and tackle inequality. b) Ambitious environmental and decarbonisation targets with a long-term national strategy and roadmap to outline how these targets and steps will be achieved, encourage investment and enable the skills development required to meet the ambitions. c) All such targets and plans must adhere to the principles of a socially and regionally inclusive transition. A recovery which has social and environmental justice at its core. Priorities should therefore acknowledge and directly address energy poverty, social inequality and disparities in employment opportunity in our society exposed by Covid-19. d) Prioritising region-based clusters as engines of growth and sustainable innovation pipelines. This is an excellent opportunity to for levelling-up and addressing the UK north/south divide by recognising the wealth of resources, expertise, enthusiasm and ready workforce available in the North for a green recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Projecting EU Demand for Natural Gas to 2030: a Meta-Analysis Author
    Title: Projecting EU demand for natural gas to 2030: a meta-analysis Author: Smith, William J. Affiliation: School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Address: Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Contacts: email: [email protected] Phone: +353 1 716 1902 Abstract Gas demand projections for the EU27 from a variety of sources are compared. Projected demand varies widely between sources, even when similar rates of economic growth and policy strength are assumed. The divergence is shown to result from differing assumptions concerning future energy intensity, on the one hand, and the future contribution of nuclear power and renewables (RES) to electricity generation on the other. The variation with time of some of these projections is also examined. It is found that the gas demand projected by both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the European Commission (EC) for 2020 and for 2030 has tended to decrease with each successive projection. This is understandable, since the penetration of RES-E has continued to exceed expectations. However, in an economically depressed, post- Fukushima Europe, estimates of future growth in both RES and nuclear generation may need significant revision. The Energy Efficiency Directive, as agreed by the Council of the Page | 1 European Union and the European Parliament in April 2012 (Council of the European Union, 2012), will also impact significantly on future gas demand, even though the measures incorporated are weaker than the original proposal. The analysis presented here shows that a “nuclear decline” due to the Fukushima disaster is seen to moderate, rather than reverse, projected demand decay. A significant shortfall in projected RES capacity, if it were to occur, constitutes a potential source of additional gas demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Energy Future for the Uk an Essay Collection
    Institute for Public Policy Research A DISTRIBUTED ENERGY FUTURE FOR THE UK AN ESSAY COLLECTION Edited by Hywel Lloyd September 2018 ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive think tank. We are an independent charitable organisation with our main offices in London. IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated think tank for the North of England, operates out of offices in Manchester and Newcastle, and IPPR Scotland, our dedicated think tank for Scotland, is based in Edinburgh. Our purpose is to conduct and promote research into, and the education of the public in, the economic, social and political sciences, science and technology, the voluntary sector and social enterprise, public services, and industry and commerce. IPPR 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no: 800065 (England and Wales), SC046557 (Scotland) This paper was first published in September 2018. © IPPR 2018 The contents and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only. The progressive policy think tank CONTENTS Biographies .....................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................5 The vision: Energy system 4.0 ................................................................................6 The essay collection ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Visit of Dr. Agustin Alonso, Commisioner of the Spanish
    October 18, 2000 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Meserve Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield FROM: Janice Dunn Lee, Director /RA/ Office of International Programs SUBJECT: NRC VISIT OF DR. AGUSTIN ALONSO, COMMISSIONER OF THE SPANISH CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR (OCTOBER 24, 2000) Attached please find a schedule of appointments, biographical and background information, and talking points for the NRC visit of Dr. Augustin Alonso, Commissioner of the Spanish Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), October 24, 2000. Attachments: As stated cc: SECY OGC EDO RES NRR NMSS AEOD OIP CONTACT: B. Doroshuk (Tel. 415-2775) DISTRIBUTION: OIP R/F SSchuyler-Hayes, Team B B. Doroshuk, Team A ADAMS - IP-2A-46 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\Spain\Alonso00.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy OFFICE OIP/Team B OIP/Team A OIP/D OIP/D NAME SSchuyler-Hayes:vl EDoroshuk RHauber J Dunn Lee DATE 10/17/00 04/ /01 04/ /01 04/ /01 04/ /01 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY NRC VISIT OF COMMISSIONER AGUSTIN ALONSO SPANISH CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR (CSN) OCTOBER 24, 2000 Schedule Tuesday, October 24: 1:15-1:45 Meeting with Commissioner Merrifield in his office 2:00-2:30 Meeting with Chairman Meserve in his office 3:00-3:30 Meeting with Commissioner Diaz in his office Accompanied by Commissioner Alonso will be accompanied to the above noted appointments by OIP staff. Purpose of the Visit Dr. Agustin Alonso, Commissioner, Spanish Nuclear Safety Council (the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear or CSN), will be in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Systems Research Last Updated: 30 June 2019
    UKERC – Landscapes – Interdisciplinary Whole Systems Research Last Updated: 30 June 2019 UKERC ENERGY RESEARCH ATLAS: INTERDISCIPLINARY WHOLE SYSTEMS RESEARCH Section 1: An overview which includes a broad characterisation of research activity in the sector and the key research challenges Section 2: An assessment of UK capabilities in relation to wider international activities, in the context of market potential Section 3: major funding streams and providers of basic research along with a brief commentary Section 4: major funding streams and providers of applied research along with a brief commentary Section 5: major funding streams for demonstration activity along with major projects and a brief commentary Section 6: Research infrastructure and other major research assets (e.g. databases, models) Section 7: Research networks, mainly in the UK, but also European networks not covered by the EU Framework Research and Technology Development (RTD) Programmes. Section 8: UK participation in energy-related EU Framework Research and Technology Development (RTD) Programmes. Section 9: UK participation in wider international initiatives, including those supported by the International Energy Agency. Prepared by Dr Antti Silvast, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture; Associate Fellow at Durham Energy Institute (DEI) Last Update: 30 June 2019 The information contained in this landscape is a snapshot of activity at the date shown – for the most up-to-date information, the reader is advised to carry out a search of the whole UKERC Research Atlas using the interface at http://ukerc.rl.ac.uk/ This document is provided free of charge. While the UKERC will continue to make every effort to ensure accuracy of information, it cannot be held responsible for any errors; any risks associated with the use of the data remain entirely the responsibility of those downloading it.
    [Show full text]
  • Payandan Shareholders
    PAYANDAN PAYANDAN 1. Company Background Creative Path to Growth Payandan Shareholders PAYANDAN Payandan’s shares belong to Mostazafan Foundation of Islamic Revolution. • Mostazafan Foundation owns 49% • Sina Energy Development Company owns 51% Mostazafan Foundation of Islamic Revolution Sina Energy Development Company PAYANDAN Mostazafan Foundation of Islamic Revolution PAYANDAN SEDCO Sina Financial Paya Saman Pars (Oil & Gas) & Investment Co (Road & Building) Sina Food Industries Iran Housing Group Saba Paya Sanat Sina (Power & Electricity) (Tire, Tiles, Glasswork, Textile, Etc) Ferdos Pars Sina ICT Group (Agriculture) Parsian Tourism Kaveh Pars & Transport Group (Mining) Alavi Foundation Alavi Civil (Charitable) Engineering Group Sina Energy Development Holding Company PAYANDAN SEDCO as one of subsidiaries of The Mostazafan Foundation of Islamic Revolution is considered one of pioneer holding companies in area of oil & gas which aims on huge projects in whole chains of oil and gas. Payandan (Oil & Gas General Contractor) North Drilling (Offshore Drilling) Pedex (Onshore Drilling) Behran (Oil Refinery Co) Dr Bagheri SEDCO Managing Director Coke Waste Water Refining Co Payandan in Numbers PAYANDAN +40 1974 Years ESTABLISHED +1400 +4000 EMPLOYEES CONTRACTOR +200,000,000 $ ANNUAL TURNOVER 75 COMPLETED PROJECTS Company Background PAYANDAN • 48” Zanjan-Mianeh Pipeline • 56” Saveh-Loushan • South Pars – SP No. 14 Pipeline (190KM) • South Pars – SP No. 13 • 56" Dezfoul- Kouhdasht Pipeline (160KM) 1974 1996 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 • Nargesi Gas • F & G Lavan • 56” Asaluyeh Gathering & • South Pars – SP Pipeline Injection No. 17 & 18 • 30” Iran- Payandan is • South Pars – SP No. 22,23,24 Armenia established (oil and • 48” Iraq Pipeline Naftkhane- Pipeline gas contractor) Baghdad (63KM) (113KM) • 56” Naeen-Tehran Gas Pipeline (133KM) • Parsian Gas Refinery • 56” Loushan-Rasht Gas Pipeline (81KM) • Pars Petrochemical Port • Arak Shazand Refinery • Kangan Gas Compressor Station • South Pars – SP No.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program
    Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert E. Ebel E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org March 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-600-1 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066001zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program author Robert E. Ebel March 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decision- makers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain
    Secure Sustainable Together Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain 2015 Review Please note that this PDF is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at http://www.iea.org/t&c/ 2015 OECD/IEA, © Secure Sustainable Together Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain 2015 Review 2015 OECD/IEA, © INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiiw Research Report 367: EU Gas Supplies Security
    f December Research Reports | 367 | 2010 Gerhard Mangott EU Gas Supplies Security: Russian and EU Perspectives, the Role of the Caspian, the Middle East and the Maghreb Countries Gerhard Mangott EU Gas Supplies Security: Gerhard Mangott is Professor at the Department Russian and EU of Political Science, University of Innsbruck. Perspectives, the Role of This paper was prepared within the framework of the Caspian, the the project ‘European Energy Security’, financed from the Jubilee Fund of the Oesterreichische Na- Middle East and the tionalbank (Project No. 115). Maghreb Countries Contents Summary ......................................................................................................................... i 1 Russia’s strategic objectives: breaking Ukrainian transit dominance in gas trade with the EU by export routes diversification ............................................................... 1 1.1 Nord Stream (Severny Potok) (a.k.a. North European Gas Pipeline, NEGP) ... 7 1.2 South Stream (Yuzhnyi Potok) and Blue Stream II ......................................... 12 2 The EU’s South European gas corridor: options for guaranteed long-term gas supplies at reasonable cost ............................................................................... 20 2.1 Gas resources in the Caspian region ............................................................. 23 2.2 Gas export potential in the Caspian and the Middle East and its impact on the EU’s Southern gas corridor .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Fakultät für Maschinenwesen Master Thesis Author: B. Sc. Joan Sabaté Francés Student ID: 03681351 Critical analysis of important aspects of the decommissioning process for an American and a Spanish nuclear power plant Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Rafael Macián-Juan (TUM, Ntech) Begin: 12/12/2017 End: 12/04/2018 Date of Presentation: 12/04/2018 Abstract Abstract The decommissioning of nuclear power plants is the driving motivation for the present work. However, decommissioning or dismantling of nuclear power plants is a wide topic and it is carried out in different ways in every country. Various factors like experience in previous decommissioning processes, own interpretation of regulations or different management teams lead to distinct decommissioning processes. However, the diverse strategies reach the goals stablished by the international organisms. Although there is a global organization called “International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)”, which “promotes nuclear safety and nuclear security standards and their implementation” [1], every country applies its own procedures or laws based on the directions from IAEA. As a consequence, this work encompasses the analysis of some important aspects of the decommissioning of two nuclear power plants: Vandellòs 1 (located in Spain) and San Onofre (located in USA). The topics analysed are the following ones: Decommissioning strategy Impact on staffing and socio-economic factors Phases of decommissioning The decommissioning management team Waste management 2 Preface Preface This work will examine and analyse how two different nuclear power plants (Vandellòs 1 and San Onofre) have developed some important aspects of decommissioning. The first section will introduce the topic taking the motivation of this work into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Sanctions
    Iran Sanctions Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs July 9, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS20871 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) Summary Iran is subject to a wide range of U.S. sanctions, restricting trade with, investment, and U.S. foreign aid to Iran, and requiring the United States to vote against international lending to Iran. Several laws and Executive Orders extend sanctions to foreign companies that do business with Iran, as part of an effort to persuade foreign firms to choose between the Iranian market and the much larger U.S. market. A formal U.S. effort to curb international energy investment in Iran began in 1996 with the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA). No firms have been sanctioned under it and the precise effects of that law on energy investment in Iran—as separate from other factors affecting international firms’ decisions on whether to invest in Iran—has been unclear. While international pressure on Iran to curb its nuclear program has increased the hesitation of many major foreign firms to invest in Iran’s energy sector, hindering Iran’s efforts to expand oil production beyond 4.1 million barrels per day, some firms continue to see opportunity in Iran. This particularly appears to be the case for companies in Asia that appear eager to fill the void left by major European and American firms and to line up steady supplies of Iranian oil and gas. ISA was first passed at a time of tightening U.S.
    [Show full text]