Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Workload

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Workload Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Workload TABLE OF CONTENTS Planning For Increased BMP Implementation Page WAP Managers Report 2 The Watershed Agricultural Program (WAP) commenced a 6 year contract with 2019 Planning Goals 3 the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), on April 1, 2019 Accomplishments-Funding 3 2019 to accelerate the implementation of BMPs with over $4 million in annual 2019 Accomplishments-BMPs 4 funding. The increase in BMP implementation funds are targeted for the 2019 Planning Goals 22 implementation of BMPs that have been on our backlog list prior to 2017. To 22020 Projected Workload 22 accomplish the increase in workload the WAP has added two assistant Whole 2020 Projected Workload-BMPs 23 Farm Planner positions and has also increased the number of engineering Staff Listing 24 department staff. Program summaries: Conservation Reserve The conservation planners focused on 92 revisions that placed identified Enhancement Program (CREP) 5 resource concerns in the prioritization process, and Whole Farm Plans were Nutrient Management 6 revised accordingly. Precision Feed Management 7-8 Farmer Education 9 In 2019 the WAP implemented 487 BMPs on all active farms at a total cost $4.6 Economic Viability 10 million. These figures include 453 BMPs on West of Hudson farms ($4.2m) and 34 2019 WAP Farm Tour 11 BMPs on East of Hudson farms ($400,000). Projects 12-17 WIRC Team 18 The Precision Feed Management (PFM) Program is a science based program that East of Hudson 19-21 develops feed management plans to deal with the large quantity of feed nutrients managed annually on participant farms. 2019 was the fourth year of Cover Photo: Heather Magnan the PFM Program, the staff were actively planning and monitoring a total of 48 Report Photos: WAP Staff farms and 148 Benchmarks were completed. The Nutrient Management Credit Program has increased to 137 participants. Through the support of DEP funding this Program will allow all those that meet the eligibility criteria to participate. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCES The WAP partners with Delaware County Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCD) and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provides technical design and implementation of water quality BMPs. Farm participants actively followed 258 WFPs and 226 Nutrient Management Plans (NMPs) in the Catskill/Delaware Watershed. Funding provided by DEP, the USDA and other sources helped the Program realize its goals. The WAP continues to partner with Cornell Cooperative Extension of Delaware County to provide educational programs to area farmers. In 2019, 634 farmers and farm advisors attended 24 educational programs with 31% of Watershed farmers attending at least one event. In 2019 the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) and the Catskill Streams Buffer Initiative (CSBI) pilot program implemented riparian buffers on four properties. Combining these two programs offers landowners with historic farmland (or marginal pastureland) the benefit of both CREP and CSBI programs. The pilot has been extended for two additional years. The WAP held an Ag tour on May 13, 2019 for the members of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) committee. The NAS committee is tasked with reviewing and evaluating the NYC DEP’s watershed protection program. This tour was an excellent opportunity to showcase the success that the WAP has had improving water quality. Larry Hulle, Watershed Agricultural Council Larry Underwood, Delaware County Soil & Water Conservation District Dale Dewing, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Delaware County Dennis DeWeese, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 2 Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Planning Goals and Accomplishments Catskill/Delaware Watershed Croton Watershed Goal Accomplishment Goal Accomplishment Annual Status Reviews 289 320 68 75 New Whole Farm Plans As identified 0 As identified 2 Ashokan Reservoir Photo: Josh Dick 2019 Implementation Accomplishments – Funding Catskill/Delaware BMP - Funding Sources Croton Watershed Total Watershed Watershed Agricultural Program - Other BMPs $ 3,250,476 $ 348,920 $ 3,599,396 - RCPP $ 380,254 $ 380,254 - WIRC $ 23,062 $ 23,062 - CREP (WAP) $ 383,496 $ - $ 383,496 Total Watershed Agricultural Program Funding $ 4,037,288 $ 348,920 $ 4,386,207 Other Funding Sources - CP-30 (FSA) $ - $ - $ - - CREP (FSA) $ 175,586 $ - $ 175,586 - CREP (DCSWCD) $ 9,746 $ 9,746 - DCSWCD $ 43,360 $ - $ 43,360 - RCPP (Pending $167,506 to be rec'd in 2020)** $ 561,119 $ - $ 561,119 - Landowner $ - $ 38,984 $ 38,984 - AWEP $ - $ - $ - - NRCS $ 467 $ - $ 467 Total Other Funding Sources $ 790,278 $ 38,984 $ 829,261 Total Funding* $ 4,827,566 $ 387,903 $ 5,215,469 * Includes In Progress Payments ** Pending amount not included in payment shown 3 2019 Implementation Accomplishments – Number of BMPs NRCS/WAC Catskill/Delaware Croton Best Management Practices Total BMP Code Watershed Watershed 108 Precision Feed Management 56 0 56 313 Waste Storage Facility 6 0 6 314 Brush Management 1 0 1 328 Conservation Crop Rotation 1 0 1 340 Cover Crop 25 0 25 342 Critical Area Planting 1 0 1 362 Diversion 3 1 4 378 Pond 1 0 1 382 Fencing 30 3 33 391 Riparian Forest Buffer 18 0 18 468 Lined Waterway or Outlet 0 1 1 472 Access Control 1 0 1 500 Obstruction Removal 2 0 2 512 Forage and Biomass Planting - Lime 26 6 32 516 Pipeline 18 1 19 528 Prescribed Grazing 1 0 1 533 Pumping Plant 3 0 3 558 Roof Runoff Structure 4 1 5 558.01 Roof Runoff Structure - crushed stone drain 2 0 2 560 Access Road Improvement 3 4 7 561 Heavy Use Area Protection 5 1 6 574 Spring Development 19 0 19 575 Animal Trails and Walkway 21 1 22 578 Stream Crossing 16 0 16 580 Streambank Protection 3 0 3 587 Structure for Water Control 1 4 5 590 Nutrient Management Plan 75 6 81 606 Subsurface Drainage 1 0 1 612 Tree & Shrub Planting 14 0 14 612 Natural Regeneration 1 0 1 612 Weed Control & Herbicide Spray 22 0 22 614 Watering Facility 19 2 21 620 Underground Outlet 6 2 8 634 Waste Transfer 6 0 6 634.01 Waste Transfer - milkhouse pumping station 3 0 3 635 Vegetated Treatment Area 1 0 1 642 Well - w/pump 2 0 2 642.01 Water Well 2 0 2 657 Potholes 1 0 1 707 Barnyard Water Management System 1 0 1 3010 Roofed Barnyard 6 0 6 3010.02 Roofed Barnyard - Concrete 6 0 6 3050.01 Manure Storage - Covered Concrete 1 0 1 3060.01 Manure Storage/Heavy Use Area - Covered - Concrete 1 0 1 3070.01 Manure Storage/Heavy Use Area - Uncovered - Concrete 1 0 1 3110 Calf Greenhouse 3 0 3 3115 Calf Housing - Pens 1 0 1 3168 Custom Service (NMCP) 1 0 1 3178 Manure Transportation Credit 1 0 1 3230 Agitation Pump 2 0 2 3410 Manure Spreader 1 0 1 3410.01 Manure Spreader - Box 1 0 1 3420 Bucket Loader 2 0 2 3430 Manure Truck 1 0 1 3499 Misc Manure Handling Equipment 1 0 1 3510 Farm Dump Cleanup 1 0 1 4100 Wash Water and Filtration System 0 1 1 5004 Fencing - Temporary 2 0 2 Total 453 34 487 Included in the above are modifications, emergency repair, repair, and repair and replacement BMPs. 4 USDA Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) 2019 Accomplishments The USDA CREP Program within the Watershed Agricultural Program utilizes the talents found within the multi-agency team assigned to work in the Watershed to promote, design and establish both Riparian Forest Buffers and Vegetative Buffers along watercourses. This year marked the 19th full year of the NYC Watershed Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) Memorandum of Agreement between New York City, New York State and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). In 2019, 11 Riparian Forest Buffer renewal contracts enrolled an additional 158.16 acres, bringing the total number of enrolled acres to 1,690.11. 2019 Total Implementation Expenditures Total Rental Payments (USDA) $213,160 Sign-Up Incentive Payment (SIP-FSA) $801 Practice Incentive Payment (PIP-FSA) $64,812 *BMP Cost (FSA) $80,860 *BMP Cost (WAP) $174,373 *Based on Federal Fiscal Year Numbers 10/01/18 – 9/30/19 Program 99-2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Catskill/Delaware Watershed $ 5,849,220 $ 314,330 $ 227,423 $ 203,211 $ 254,952 $ 261,197 $ 395,490 $ 475,423 $ 388,194 $ 181,405 $ 568,828 $ 9,119,673 Croton Watershed $ 36,515 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,515 5 Nutrient Management Program 2019 Accomplishments In 2019, the Nutrient Management Team completed 75 nutrient management plans that consisted of 49 large farms and 26 small farms. Nutrient Management Plan Percent Current Analysis Large Farms Small Farms Combined 154 72 226 number % of Total number % of Total number % of Total Current 151 98.1% 71 98.6% 222 98.2% 1 yr out of date 1 0.6% 1 1% 2 0.9% 2 years out of date 1 1% 0 0% 1 0.4% 3 years out of date 0 0% 0 0% 0 0.0% > 3 yrs out of date 1 1% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% Needs NMP 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Total 154 100% 72 100.0% 226 100.0% Nutrient Management Credit (NM Credit) The NM Credit Program was offered to 137 participating farms. The 2018-2019 Credit year allowed for the addition of any eligible farm. One nutrient management credit farm left the program due to not meeting eligibility requirements. Six new farms were selected from the prioritized general list of NM Credit eligible farms. For the 2019-2020 Nutrient Management Credit Program year, we will continue to add eligible participants. Photos: Rich Toebe 6 Precision Feed Management (PFM) 2019 was the fourth year of the PFM Program through the Watershed Agricultural Program.
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Aquatic Invasive Species Surveys of New York City Water Supply Reservoirs Within the Catskill/Delaware and Croton Watersheds
    2014 aquatic invasive species surveys of New York City water supply reservoirs within the Catskill/Delaware and Croton Watersheds Megan Wilckens1, Holly Waterfield2 and Willard N. Harman3 INTRODUCTION The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) oversees the management and protection of the New York City water supply reservoirs, which are split between two major watershed systems, referred to as East of Hudson Watersheds (Figure 1) and Catskill/Delaware Watershed (Figure 2). The DEP is concerned about the presence of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in reservoirs because they can threaten water quality and water supply operations (intake pipes and filtration systems), degrade the aquatic ecosystem found there as well as reduce recreational opportunities for the community. Across the United States, AIS cause around $120 billion per year in environmental damages and other losses (Pimentel et al. 2005). The SUNY Oneonta Biological Field Station was contracted by DEP to conduct AIS surveys on five reservoirs; the Ashokan, Rondout, West Branch, New Croton and Kensico reservoirs. Three of these reservoirs, as well as major tributary streams to all five reservoirs, were surveyed for AIS in 2014. This report details the survey results for the Ashokan, Rondout, and West Branch reservoirs, and Esopus Creek, Rondout Creek, West Branch Croton River, East Branch Croton River and Bear Gutter Creek. The intent of each survey was to determine the presence or absence of the twenty- three AIS on the NYC DEP’s AIS priority list (Table 1). This list was created by a subcommittee of the Invasive Species Working Group based on a water supply risk assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Gear, Multi-Site Fish Survey in New
    SUBMERSED AQUATIC VEGETATION IN A HUDSON RIVER WATERSHED: THE GREAT SWAMP OF NEW YORK A Final Report of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program Chris Cotroneo Polgar Fellow Biology Department Queens College 65-30 Kissena Boulevard Flushing, NY 11367 Project Advisor: John Waldman, Ph.D. Biology Department Queens College 65-30 Kissena Boulevard Flushing, NY 11367 Cotroneo, C., and J. Waldman. 2019. Submersed Aquatic Vegetation in a Hudson River Watershed: The Great Swamp of New York. Section III: 1-44 pp. In S.H. Fernald, D.J. Yozzo and H. Andreyko (eds.), Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program, 2016. Hudson River Foundation. III-1 ABSTRACT Baseline information about submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) communities and their associated fish assemblages represents a valuable information resource for use by the scientific community for comparison to other studies, documenting changes over time, and to assist with actions such as fish passage. In order to collect data throughout the entire growing season, a comprehensive six-month, submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) study was conducted in New York’s Great Swamp. Sampling sites were selected based upon the presence of SAV representative of the surrounding area and were sampled bi- weekly. Aerial percent cover was estimated for each SAV species identified within the sampling site. A total of 12 SAV stands were sampled throughout the course of the study. A total of 58 SAV samples were taken, revealing five dominant SAV species: Potamogeton crispus, P. pusillus, P. illinoensis, Ceratophyllum demersum, and Elodea canadensis. Every fourth week the same sites were sampled for nekton to determine if habitat use changed with any changes in dominant SAV species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Orange Greene Dutchess Albany Columbia Schoharie
    Barriers to Migratory Fish in the Hudson River Estuary Watershed, New York State Minden Glen Hoosick Florida Canajoharie Glenville Halfmoon Pittstown S a r a t o g a Schaghticoke Clifton Park Root Charleston S c h e n e c t a d y Rotterdam Frost Pond Dam Waterford Schenectady Zeno Farm Pond Dam Niskayuna Cherry Valley M o n t g o m e r y Duanesburg Reservoir Dam Princetown Fessenden Pond Dam Long Pond Dam Shaver Pond Dam Mill Pond Dam Petersburgh Duanesburg Hudson Wildlife Marsh DamSecond Pond Dam Cohoes Lake Elizabeth Dam Sharon Quacken Kill Reservoir DamUnnamed Lent Wildlife Pond Dam Delanson Reservoir Dam Masick Dam Grafton Lee Wildlife Marsh Dam Brunswick Martin Dunham Reservoir Dam Collins Pond Dam Troy Lock & Dam #1 Duane Lake Dam Green Island Cranberry Pond Dam Carlisle Esperance Watervliet Middle DamWatervliet Upper Dam Colonie Watervliet Lower Dam Forest Lake Dam Troy Morris Bardack Dam Wager Dam Schuyler Meadows Club Dam Lake Ridge Dam Beresford Pond Dam Watervliet rapids Ida Lake Dam 8-A Dyken Pond Dam Schuyler Meadows Dam Mt Ida Falls Dam Altamont Metal Dam Roseboom Watervliet Reservoir Dam Smarts Pond Dam dam Camp Fire Girls DamUnnamed dam Albia Dam Guilderland Glass Pond Dam spillway Wynants Kill Walter Kersch Dam Seward Rensselaer Lake Dam Harris Dam Albia Ice Pond Dam Altamont Main Reservoir Dam West Albany Storm Retention Dam & Dike 7-E 7-F Altamont Reservoir Dam I-90 Dam Sage Estates Dam Poestenkill Knox Waldens Pond DamBecker Lake Dam Pollard Pond Dam Loudonville Reservoir Dam John Finn Pond Dam Cobleskill Albany Country Club Pond Dam O t s e g o Schoharie Tivoli Lake Dam 7-A .
    [Show full text]
  • Work on Watersheds Report Highlights Stories Coordinate Groups
    Work on Watersheds Hu ds on R i v e r UTICA SARATOGA SPRINGS Mo haw k River SCHENECTADY TROY ALBANY y r a u t s E r e v i R n o s d u H KINGSTON POUGHKEEPSIE NEWBURGH Hudson River MIDDLETOWN Watershed Regions PEEKSKILL Upper Hudson River Watershed Mohawk River Watershed YONKERS Hudson River Estuary Watershed NEW YORK Work on Watersheds INTRODUCTION | THE HUDSON RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE unites and empowers communities to protect their local water resources. We work throughout the Hudson River watershed to support community-based watershed groups, help municipalities work together on water issues, and serve as a collective voice across the region. We are a collaborative network of community groups, organizations, municipalities, agencies, and individuals. The Hudson River Watershed Alliance hosts educational and capacity-building events, including the Annual Watershed Conference to share key information and promote networking, Watershed Roundtables to bring groups together to share strategies, workshops to provide trainings, and a breakfast lecture series that focuses on technical and scientific innovations. We provide technical and strategic assistance on watershed work, including fostering new initiatives and helping sustain groups as they meet new challenges. What is a watershed group? A watershed is the area of land from which water drains into a river, stream, or other waterbody. Water flows off the land into a waterbody by way of rivers and streams, and underground through groundwater aquifers. The smaller streams that contribute to larger rivers are called tributaries. Watersheds are defined by the lay of the land, with mountains and hills typically forming their borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Valley Region: Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch
    Hudson Valley MAPS Region INSIDE Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch Including Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, Orange, Putnam, Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Schenectady, Ulster, Washington, and Westchester Counties Why We Have Advice Chemicals in the Hudson Valley Region Fishing is fun and fish are an important part of a healthy diet. Fish contain high quality The primary chemicals of concern in the Hudson Valley Region are PCBs and mercury. protein, essential nutrients, healthy fish oils, and are low in saturated fat. However, A few waterbodies have chlordane, dieldrin, dioxin, cadmium and PFCs. some fish contain chemicals at levels that may be harmful to health. To help people make healthier choices about which fish they eat, the New York State Department of Health • PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), chlordane, and dieldrin are man-made issues advice about eating sportfish (fish you catch). The health advice about which fish chemicals that were banned in the 1970s and 1980s. Dioxins are byproducts to eat depends on: released by a number of activities, including burning of trash, wood fires, and manufacturing. PCBs, chlordane, dieldrin, and dioxin remain in the Where You Fish environment and accumulate in the fat of fish and other animals. The advice on eating fish from the Hudson Valley Region depends • Mercury occurs naturally, but it is also released into our environment from upon where you fish. The region has great fishing and many waters sources like coal combustion. Testing of fish in the Adirondack and Catskill where everyone in the family can eat up to four fish meals a month. Regions and in some NYS reservoirs has shown certain species of fish have However, some waters and their tributaries have been affected higher levels of mercury than in other parts of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. 16 NO 37 Sept 17 2020
    VOL. 16 NO. 37 GRAHAMSVILLE, NY 12740 SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 $1.00 Mysterious Book Report John D. McKenna Pg 5 • The Olive Jar Carol La Monda Pg 6 • The Scene Too Jane Harrison Pg 11 Her Quirky Journey – Marilyn Borth Pg 11 • Knarf’s Classic Movie & Trivia Pg 27 The Neversink Association Annual Picnic Meeting The Neversink Association held its annual BYO picnic and annual meeting on 9/6/20 at the Frost Valley Y in Claryville. Over 70 mem- bers attended this year's "socially distanced" meeting where masks and tempera- ture checks were required and seating was spaced at least 6 feet apart. Ed Ostapchuk of Trout Unlimited spoke of his years of fishing the Neversink River in Claryville area. He also gave information about Ed Sens, a local fisherman and fly tier extraordinaire who lived and fished in our area. (Contd. Pg. 4) Neversink Associaton Board SC Deputy Sheriff Robert Cintron Fallsburg CSD Kicks Off School Year School Resource Officer of the Year To welcome back students, Fallsburg Central School District (FCSD) held a special parade through thirteen key locations along school bus routes in the Town of Fallsburg on September 11, 2020. Deputy Sheriff Robert Cintron of the Sullivan County Van at Main Street Houses, where members of the Sheriff's Office has been named School Resource Officer of the community are passing out masks and a kit to color the mask year by the State of New York Police Juvenile Officers Association. (Contd. Pg. 2) PAGE 2 THE TOWNSMAN SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 YE OLDE TRI-VALLEY TOWNSMAN ON THE FRONT BURNER: In the transgression of an evil OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR THE TOWN OF DENNING AND man there is a snare; but the righteous doth sing and rejoice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Southern New York Fishing Derby Winners
    2016 Annual Southern New York Fishing Derby Winners Largest Brown Trout First Prize $100 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 14lb 1 ½ oz. – 31 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 1/19/16 Second Prize $50 –Anthony Cerrato– Mountain Lakes – 14lb ½ oz. – 30 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir - 7/10/16 Third Prize $25 –Piotr Silski– Glendale – 13lb 3 oz. – 30 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 8/20/16 Largest Lake Trout First Prize: $100 –Jeff Brogan– Valhalla – 12lb 3 oz. – 32” – Kensico Reservoir – 6/23/16 Second Prize: $50 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 12lb 1 ½ oz. – 31” – Lake Gleneida – 6/16/16 Third Place: $25 – Louis Millspaugh – McAdoo, Pa. – 10lb 11 oz. – 30” – Rondout Reservoir. – 5/27/16 Largest Rainbow Trout First Prize $50 – Al Spence – Grahamsville – 4lb 12 oz. – 22” – Neversink River – 6/16/16 Largest Brook Trout First Prize $50 – Lester Milk – Ellenville – 1lb 15 ¾ oz. – 18” – Neversink River – 4/1/16 Largest Landlock Salmon First Prize - $50 – Joseph Caruso – Ellenville – 5lb 10 oz. – 26 ½” – Neversink Reservoir – 4/11/16 Largest Largemouth Bass First Prize - $100 – William Mastro – Wallkill – 7lb 4 oz. – 23” – Ashokan Reservoir – 10/17/16 Second Prize - $50 –Tony Monteiro– Mahopac – 6lb 11 oz. – 23” – Bog Brook Reservoir – 6/18/16 Third Prize - $25 –Xing Xin Chen–Brooklyn –5lb 5 oz. – 21” – Middle Branch Reservoir – 8/20/16 Largest Smallmouth Bass First Prize - $100 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 5lb 9 ½ oz. – 22 ¾” – Bog Brook Reservoir – 10/20/16 Second Prize - $50 – Eric Solano – Hartsdale – 5lb 2 oz. – 21” – Bog Brook Reservoir - 9/12/16 Third Prize - $25 –Lukasz Rzezwicki – Putnam Valley– 4lb 15 oz. – 21 ½”–Middle Branch Reservoir – 11/9/16 Largest White Perch First Prize - $100 –Russell Lugbauer– Pleasant Valley – 2lb 9 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Watershed Water Quality Annual Report
    NYC Department of Environmental Protection 2018 Watershed Water Quality Annual Report July 2019 Vincent Sapienza, P.E., Commissioner Paul V. Rush, P.E., Deputy Commissioner Bureau of Water Supply The cover photo of the Neversink Intake Chamber was taken by Tina L. Johnstone, P.E. Tina began her career at DEP in 1992 as a Civil Engineer Intern in the Environmental Programs group in Ashokan and since then has held several positions of increasing responsibility. In 2016 Tina was appointed Director of Source Water Operations, where she has been responsible for source water reservoir operations, infrastructure maintenance and operations north of New York City, maintaining a robust dam safety program for all New York City owned and operated dams, and the operations of seven wastewater treatment plants in upstate New York. Tina will leave DEP in August 2019 to begin the next phase of her life and we thank her for her 27 years of service at DEP. Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xi List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Adopted Comprehensive Plan Update
    TOWN OF SOUTHEAST Comprehensive Plan Update Prepared for: Town of Southeast Prepared by: AKRF, Inc. Adopted August 21, 2014 Town of Southeast Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted August 21, 2014 Town of Southeast Town Board: Tony Hay, Supervisor Robert Cullen, Councilman /Deputy Supervisor Elizabeth Hudak, Councilwoman Lynne Eckardt, Councilwoman Edwin Alvarez, Councilman Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Coordination With Other Planning Efforts ..................................................................... 1-2 1.2 the Comprehensive Plan.................................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 the Vision ........................................................................................................................ 1-3 Section 2: Geographic and Historic Context .......................................................................... 2-1 2.0 Local and Regional Context............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Southeast’s History ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Historic Resource Protection........................................................................................... 2-5
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Reservoir Fishing
    New York City ReservoirBy Mike Flaherty Fishing ew York City reservoirs offer a surprisingly diverse group of recreational boating on a day-use basis. Review page 22 or visit fish species that people can catch (see table on page 27). www.nyc.gov/dep for more information. NThese include coldwater fish, such as salmon and trout that need water temperatures less than 70 degrees, and warmwater fish Warmwater fish that can tolerate higher water temperatures. Here is what you need All of the NYC Reservoirs provide good fishing for warmwater fish. In to know to get started fishing the NYC reservoirs. reservoirs with stable water levels, most of the warmwater species will thrive in established submerged vegetation beds. Reservoirs Accessing the reservoirs that experience fluctuating water levels are usually relatively free of A NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) access permit vegetation, and the warmwater species will often orientate to shallow is required to access the city-controlled reservoirs and lakes. In addi- bottom structure, such as rock ledges, drop-offs, or boulders for tion, special boating permits are available for storing your boat on the shelter. They are generally more available to shoreline anglers than shoreline in designated areas. Some reservoirs allow non-motorized coldwater fish. Continued on page 26. Largemouth bass are abundant in the vegetated reservoirs east of Hudson River. Titicus and Croton Falls reservoirs have produced bass over 8 pounds. 2016–2017 New York Freshwater Fishing Guide 25 Smallmouth Bass
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report Is a Publication of the Watershed Agricultural Council, a Nonprofit 501(C)3 Organization
    1 Our Mission: To promote the economic viability of agriculture and forestry, the protection of water quality, and the conservation of working landscapes through strong local leadership and sustainable public-private partnerships. Thank you to our collaborative partners: Delaware County Soil and Water Conservation District, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Delaware County, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Greene County, United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency. The 2019 Annual Report is a publication of the Watershed Agricultural Council, a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization. The Council is funded by the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service and other sources. The Council is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. This issue is printed on environmentally friendly recycled paper. 2 Defining a Path to Success In October staff attended a team building day at Teatown Lake Reservation in Ossining, NY. ision, mission and strategic direction has been, and remains, critical to the We have partnerships, sub-contracts and work side-by-side with the NYS College “What has been the key to success for core of the Watershed Agricultural Council (WAC). These values have paved of Environmental Science and Forestry, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Delaware V the Watershed Agricultural Council?” our way to become an internationally recognized leader in the field of environmen- and Greene Counties, Delaware County Soil and Water Conservation District, My answer was simple, “Excellent staff tal conservation and watershed management. Natural Resource Conservation Services and the United States Department of and key partnerships.” Having a well thought out strategic plan, goals and objectives doesn’t Agriculture Farm Service Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • ID Number Name of Hudson Estuary
    ID Number Name of Hudson Estuary Watershed 1 Cold Spring Creek 2 Sprout Creek 3 Minisceongo Creek 4 Bear Kill 5 Shingle Kill 6 Whaley Lake Stream 7 Shekomeko Creek 8 Middle Shawangunk Kill 9 Mill Creek 10 Swarte Kill 11 Bozen Kill 12 Headwaters Taghkanic Creek 13 Lower Shawangunk Kill 14 Kleine Kill 15 Moordener Kill 16 Beaver Kill 17 Onesquethaw Creek 18 Upper Pochuck Creek 19 Vlockie Kill 20 Quassaick Creek 21 Upper Shawangunk Kill 22 Little Wappinger Creek 23 Quarryville Brook 24 Bash Bish Brook 25 Vloman Kill 26 Lattintown Creek 27 Murderers Creek 28 Papscanee Creek 29 Sparta Brook 30 Kline Kill 31 Headwaters Roeliff Jansen Kill 32 Fall Kill 33 Black Creek 34 Clove Creek 35 Hunger Kill 36 Woodland Creek 37 Indigot Creek 38 Mudder Kill 39 Coxsackie Creek 40 Twaalfskill Creek 41 Sandburg Creek 42 Mannayunk Kill 43 Landsman Kill 44 Black Meadow Creek 45 Hannacroix Creek 46 Pocantico River 47 Fall Kill 48 Kisco River 49 Dwarr Kill 50 Vly Creek 51 East Branch Wappinger Creek 52 Roundout Reservoir 53 Foundry Brook 54 Lower Wawayanda Creek 55 Stony Kill 56 Bailey Brook 57 Wiccopee Creek 58 Mill Brook 59 Upper Wawayanda Creek 60 Hunns Lake Creek 61 Birch Creek 62 Masonic Creek 63 Clove Brook 64 Satterly Creek 65 Wynants Kill 66 Agawamuck Creek 67 Stony Creek 68 Black Creek 69 Muddy Brook 70 Wyomanock Creek 71 Rutgers Creek 72 Ashokan Reservoir 73 Otter Kill 74 Bonny Brook 75 Lakes Kill 76 Cedar Pond Brook 77 Wappinger Lake 78 Stockport Creek 79 Coxing Kill 80 Stony Clove Creek 81 Twaalfskill Brook 82 Tackawasick Creek 83 Popolopen Creek 84
    [Show full text]