DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Annual Southern New York Fishing Derby Winners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Annual Southern New York Fishing Derby Winners 2016 Annual Southern New York Fishing Derby Winners Largest Brown Trout First Prize $100 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 14lb 1 ½ oz. – 31 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 1/19/16 Second Prize $50 –Anthony Cerrato– Mountain Lakes – 14lb ½ oz. – 30 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir - 7/10/16 Third Prize $25 –Piotr Silski– Glendale – 13lb 3 oz. – 30 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 8/20/16 Largest Lake Trout First Prize: $100 –Jeff Brogan– Valhalla – 12lb 3 oz. – 32” – Kensico Reservoir – 6/23/16 Second Prize: $50 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 12lb 1 ½ oz. – 31” – Lake Gleneida – 6/16/16 Third Place: $25 – Louis Millspaugh – McAdoo, Pa. – 10lb 11 oz. – 30” – Rondout Reservoir. – 5/27/16 Largest Rainbow Trout First Prize $50 – Al Spence – Grahamsville – 4lb 12 oz. – 22” – Neversink River – 6/16/16 Largest Brook Trout First Prize $50 – Lester Milk – Ellenville – 1lb 15 ¾ oz. – 18” – Neversink River – 4/1/16 Largest Landlock Salmon First Prize - $50 – Joseph Caruso – Ellenville – 5lb 10 oz. – 26 ½” – Neversink Reservoir – 4/11/16 Largest Largemouth Bass First Prize - $100 – William Mastro – Wallkill – 7lb 4 oz. – 23” – Ashokan Reservoir – 10/17/16 Second Prize - $50 –Tony Monteiro– Mahopac – 6lb 11 oz. – 23” – Bog Brook Reservoir – 6/18/16 Third Prize - $25 –Xing Xin Chen–Brooklyn –5lb 5 oz. – 21” – Middle Branch Reservoir – 8/20/16 Largest Smallmouth Bass First Prize - $100 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 5lb 9 ½ oz. – 22 ¾” – Bog Brook Reservoir – 10/20/16 Second Prize - $50 – Eric Solano – Hartsdale – 5lb 2 oz. – 21” – Bog Brook Reservoir - 9/12/16 Third Prize - $25 –Lukasz Rzezwicki – Putnam Valley– 4lb 15 oz. – 21 ½”–Middle Branch Reservoir – 11/9/16 Largest White Perch First Prize - $100 –Russell Lugbauer– Pleasant Valley – 2lb 9 oz. – 15” – Middle Branch Reservoir – 6/25/16 Second Prize - $50 –Tony Monteiro – Mahopac - 2lb 8 ½ oz. – 15”- Diverting Reservoir - 4/20/16 Third Prize - $25 – Dave Partlow – Carmel – 2lb 8 oz. – 16 ½” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 11/3/16 Largest Yellow Perch First Prize - $100 –– Tony Monteiro – 2lb 5 oz. – 16 ¾” – New Croton Reservoir – 4/17/16 Second Prize - $50 –Tom Yager– Grahamsville – 2lb 3 ½ oz. – 15 ½” –Swan Lake – 2/1/16 Third Prize - $25 –Stephen Duffy– Mahopac – 2lb 2 oz. – 15” –Titicus Reservoir –3/13/16 Largest Crappie First Prize - $100 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 3lb 6 ½ oz. – 16 ½” – New Croton Reservoir –2/7/16 Second Prize - $50 –Bob Jorgensen– Mahopac – 2lb 13 oz. – 16 3/8 ” – Lake Oscawana – 10/5/16 Third Prize - $25 – Kevin Riley – Glen Spey – 2lb 12 oz. – 16 ¼” – Toronto Reservoir – 1/24/16 Largest Walleye First Prize - $100 – Ahmed Ali – Poughkeepsie – 8lb 10 oz. – 28” – Croton Falls Reservoir – 11/7/16 Second Prize - $50 – Eric Solano - Hartsdale – 7lb 10 oz. – 27” – Bog Brook Reservoir – 9/5/16 Third Prize - $25 – Tony Monteiro – Mahopac – 7lb 4 ½” oz. – 27 ¾” – East Branch Croton River – 2/20/16 Largest Pickerel First Prize - $100 – Tom Yager – Grahamsville – 6lb 1 oz. – 28” – Neversink Reservoir – 7/4/16 Second Prize - $50 – Ian Exner – Woodbourne – 4lb 6 oz. – 25 ¾” – Neversink Reservoir – 5/30/16 Third Prize - $25 – Josh Kortright – Neversink – 4lb 3 ½ oz. – 24 ¾” – Swan Lake – 1/20/16 Largest Striped Bass First Prize - $100 – Mark Sofranko – Croton on Hudson – 42lb 8 oz. – 44” – Hudson River – 4/22/16 Second Prize - $50 – Caroline DiMezza - Purdys – 37 lb. 6 oz. – 43” – Long Island Sound – 6/29/16 Third Prize - $25 –Stan Drezek – Buchanan – 36 lb 1 oz. – 43” – Hudson River – 5/7/16 Largest Bluefish - $50 –Caroline DiMezza – Purdys – 14lb 5 oz. – 37 ½” – Long Island Sound –10/31/16 Largest Carp - $50 – Joseph Sobota – Carmel – 56lb – 46½” – New Croton Reservoir – 6/19/16 Largest Northern Pike - $50 – No Entries in 2016 Largest Tiger Musky – $50 – Jiane Hang Luo –Brooklyn – 7lb 7oz. – 32” - Middle Branch Reservoir – 7/4/16 Largest Catfish - $50 – Jeff Thomas – Marlboro – 4lb 4 oz. – 20 ½” – Rondout Reservoir – 6/29/16 Largest Sunfish - $50 – Rob Scaracelli – Poughquag – 1lb 2 oz. – 10 ½” – Muscoot Reservoir – 2/17/16 These 36 Annual Award Winners received $2,050 in Prize Money plus a Fishing Hat. PLEASE NOTE: Check Website at www.StewartMarine.com or your local bait and tackle weigh-in station on or about the 10th of each month for updated results of the 2017 fishing derby. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 01435900 NEVERSINK RESERVOIR NEAR NEVERSINK, NY Upper Delaware Basin Middle Delaware-Mongaup-Brodhead Subbasin
    Water-Data Report 2013 01435900 NEVERSINK RESERVOIR NEAR NEVERSINK, NY Upper Delaware Basin Middle Delaware-Mongaup-Brodhead Subbasin LOCATION.--Lat 41°49′27″, long 74°38′20″ referenced to North American Datum of 1927, Sullivan County, NY, Hydrologic Unit 02040104, at a gatehouse at Neversink Dam on Neversink River, and 2 mi southwest of Neversink. DRAINAGE AREA.--92.5 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--June 1953 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WDR NY-85-1: Drainage area. WDR NY-82-1: 1976 and 1977-Diversion. GAGE.--Nonrecording gage. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929 (levels by Board of Water Supply, City of New York). REMARKS.--Reservoir is formed by an earthfill rockfaced dam. Storage began June 2, 1953. Usable capacity 34,941 mil gal between minimum operating level, elevation 1,319.0 ft, and crest of spillway, elevation 1,440.0 ft. Capacity at crest of spillway 37,146 mil gal; at minimum operating level, 2,205 mil gal; dead storage below diversion sill and outlet sill, elevation 1,314.0 ft, 1,680 mil gal. Figures given herein represent total contents. Reservoir impounds water for diversion (01435800) through Neversink-Grahamsville Tunnel to Rondout Reservoir on Rondout Creek, in Hudson River basin, for water supply of City of New York; for release during periods of low flow in the lower Delaware River basin, as directed by the Delaware River Master; and for conservation release. No diversion prior to Dec. 3, 1953. Records provided by New York City Department of Environmental Protection. Elevation is an instantaneous reading on first day of following month.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan
    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Aquatic Invasive Species Surveys of New York City Water Supply Reservoirs Within the Catskill/Delaware and Croton Watersheds
    2014 aquatic invasive species surveys of New York City water supply reservoirs within the Catskill/Delaware and Croton Watersheds Megan Wilckens1, Holly Waterfield2 and Willard N. Harman3 INTRODUCTION The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) oversees the management and protection of the New York City water supply reservoirs, which are split between two major watershed systems, referred to as East of Hudson Watersheds (Figure 1) and Catskill/Delaware Watershed (Figure 2). The DEP is concerned about the presence of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in reservoirs because they can threaten water quality and water supply operations (intake pipes and filtration systems), degrade the aquatic ecosystem found there as well as reduce recreational opportunities for the community. Across the United States, AIS cause around $120 billion per year in environmental damages and other losses (Pimentel et al. 2005). The SUNY Oneonta Biological Field Station was contracted by DEP to conduct AIS surveys on five reservoirs; the Ashokan, Rondout, West Branch, New Croton and Kensico reservoirs. Three of these reservoirs, as well as major tributary streams to all five reservoirs, were surveyed for AIS in 2014. This report details the survey results for the Ashokan, Rondout, and West Branch reservoirs, and Esopus Creek, Rondout Creek, West Branch Croton River, East Branch Croton River and Bear Gutter Creek. The intent of each survey was to determine the presence or absence of the twenty- three AIS on the NYC DEP’s AIS priority list (Table 1). This list was created by a subcommittee of the Invasive Species Working Group based on a water supply risk assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012
    Prepared in cooperation with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012 Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The West Basin of Ashokan Reservoir at sunset. Photograph by Elizabeth Nystrom, 2013. Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012 By Douglas A. Burns and Christopher L. Gazoorian Prepared in cooperation with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Burns, D.A., and Gazoorian, C.L., 2015, Estimates of natural streamflow at two streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, water years 1932–2012: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Water Story
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Water Quality
    Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ v List of Figures....................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................... xi Errata Sheet Issued May 4, 2011 .......................................................................................... xiii 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 What is the purpose and scope of this report? ......................................................... 1 1.2 What constitutes the New York City water supply system? ................................... 1 1.3 What are the objectives of water quality monitoring and how are the sampling programs organized? ........................................................................... 3 1.4 What types of monitoring networks are used to provide coverage of such a large watershed? .................................................................................................. 5 1.5 How do the different monitoring efforts complement each other? .......................... 9 1.6 How many water samples did DEP collect
    [Show full text]
  • Catskill Trends
    Catskill Trends Mike McHale, Doug Burns, Jason Siemion, Mike Antidormi, Greg Lawrence U.S. Geological Survey, Troy NY New York Catskill LTM Network New York NADP and MDN Station Mean Acidity 1991-2014 60 40 Neversink River 20 Biscuit Brook 0 Rondout Creek -20 Tison's Creek in micromoles per liter Acid Neutralizing Capacity, Winnisook -40 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 pH, in pH units Catskill Sampling Water sampling at 5 streams in the Catskill Mountains Monthly sampling plus storms ~ 35 samples per year Winnisook soils were sampled in 1993 (Javier Ruiz) and 2012 (McHale). Fall Brook Soils were sampled in 2001 (Lawrence) and 2011 (Lawrence and others). There is an NADP site at Biscuit Brook Rondout Creek above Peekamoose (RC) Winnisook Watershed (WN) on the slopes of Slide Mountain in the headwaters of the Neversink River basin Biscuit Brook eq/L) 16 50140 eq/L) ARP Emmissions 14 NY68 Deposition 120 Biscuit Brook ( conc. 40 2- 4 12 100 30 10 80 8 60 20 6 40 10 4 20 2 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20152015 Biscuit NTN annual volume-weighted SO annual volume-weighted NTN Biscuit Biscuit NTN annual volume-weighted ( SO42- conc. annual volume-weighted NTN Biscuit EPA Acid Rain Program SO2 annual emissions (million tons) SO2(million EPA annual emissions Rain Program Acid EPA Acid Rain Program SO2 annual emissions (million tons) EPA Acid Rain Program SO2 annual emissions (million tons)EPASO2 (million annual Rain Program emissions Acid Year Biscuit Brook 7 2860 eq/L) ARP Emmissions 26 NY68 Deposition 6 Biscuit Brook 50 conc.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Workload
    Watershed Agricultural Program 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Workload TABLE OF CONTENTS Planning For Increased BMP Implementation Page WAP Managers Report 2 The Watershed Agricultural Program (WAP) commenced a 6 year contract with 2019 Planning Goals 3 the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), on April 1, 2019 Accomplishments-Funding 3 2019 to accelerate the implementation of BMPs with over $4 million in annual 2019 Accomplishments-BMPs 4 funding. The increase in BMP implementation funds are targeted for the 2019 Planning Goals 22 implementation of BMPs that have been on our backlog list prior to 2017. To 22020 Projected Workload 22 accomplish the increase in workload the WAP has added two assistant Whole 2020 Projected Workload-BMPs 23 Farm Planner positions and has also increased the number of engineering Staff Listing 24 department staff. Program summaries: Conservation Reserve The conservation planners focused on 92 revisions that placed identified Enhancement Program (CREP) 5 resource concerns in the prioritization process, and Whole Farm Plans were Nutrient Management 6 revised accordingly. Precision Feed Management 7-8 Farmer Education 9 In 2019 the WAP implemented 487 BMPs on all active farms at a total cost $4.6 Economic Viability 10 million. These figures include 453 BMPs on West of Hudson farms ($4.2m) and 34 2019 WAP Farm Tour 11 BMPs on East of Hudson farms ($400,000). Projects 12-17 WIRC Team 18 The Precision Feed Management (PFM) Program is a science based program that East of Hudson 19-21 develops feed management plans to deal with the large quantity of feed nutrients managed annually on participant farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewster Wellfield, Putnam County
    FINAL RESTORATION PLAN BREWSTER WELL FIELD SUPERFUND SITE BREWSTER, PUTNAM COUNTY, NEW YORK November 2008 Prepared by: United States Fish and Wildlife Service on behalf of the Department of the Interior and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Contact: Anne Secord U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. A. INTRODUCTION 1 B. BACKGROUND 1 C. NATURAL RESOURCES AND IMPACTS TO THOSE RESOURCES 3 D. NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE SETTLEMENT 4 E. PROPOSED RESTORATION 4 1. GOALS OF THE RESTORATION PROJECT(S) 4 2. SPECIFIC PROJECTS CONSIDERED 5 a. Bog Brook Unique Area Restoration 5 b. Bog Turtle Early Successional Wetland Habitat Restoration 7 3. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF FEASIBLE PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 8 4. PREFERRED PROJECT FOR IMPLEMENTATION 10 F. COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) 11 G. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED 11 LITERATURE CITED 13 A. INTRODUCTION In August 1996, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), on behalf of the United States Department of the Interior (DOI), and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), on behalf of the State of New York, collectively referred to as the “Trustees,” settled a natural resource damage claim with the Responsible Parties (RPs) for the Brewster Well Field Superfund Site (the Site) located in the Village of Brewster (Village), Town of Southeast, Putnam County, New York. The Trustees sought this settlement as compensation for injuries to natural resources due to release of environmental contaminants from the Site. We are required to use settlement funds to compensate for those injuries by restoring natural resources, supporting habitat, and/or services provided by the injured resources.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply
    New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Waterfowl Management Program July 31, 2012 Prepared in accordance with the Final 2007 (Waterfowl Management Program-Section 4.1) of the United States Environmental Protection Filtration Avoidance Determination A Waterfowl Management Program was developed to evaluate and mitigate pollutant impacts (fecal coliform bacteria) from migratory and resident waterbirds (waterfowl, gulls and cormorants). The purpose of the study reported here, for the period April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012, is to evaluate further the trends observed in bird numbers and their effect on fecal coliform bacteria levels as a consequence of DEP’s Waterfowl Management Program. Prepared by: Christopher A. Nadareski, Section Chief, Wildlife Studies NYC Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Division of Watershed Water Quality Operations TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures 3-6 List of Tables 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction 9-10 Methods 11-17 Results and Discussion 18-47 Conclusions 48-49 References 50-51 Appendix A (reservoir maps with bird zones and water sampling locations) 52-62 2 LIST OF FIGURES Page Number Figure 1. Kensico Reservoir waterbird totals. 18 Figure 2. Kensico Reservoir Surface Water Treatment Rule compliance (fecal coliforms 100mL-1 at DEL18 and CATLEFF). 19 Figure 3. Kensico Reservoir fecal coliforms 100mL-1 at DEL18 vs. total waterbirds (4/1/2010 to 3/31/2011). 21 Figure 4. Kensico Reservoir fecal coliforms 100mL-1 at DEL18 vs. total waterbirds (4/1/2011 to 3/31/2012). 22 Figure 5. Kensico Reservoir fecal coliforms 100mL-1 at CATLEFF vs. total waterbirds (4/1/2010 to 3/31/2011).
    [Show full text]