DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Adaptation and Action Plan for the Norton Bay Watershed, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Adaptation and Action Plan for the Norton Bay Watershed, Alaska Climate Adaptation and Action Plan for the Norton Bay Watershed, Alaska Norton Bay Inter-Tribal Watershed Council Norton Bay, Alaska Emily Murray Project Coordinator Norton Bay Inter-Tribal Watershed Council Hal Shepherd, Principal Jessica Ryan, Climate Consultant Laoch Consulting Prepared in cooperation with Climate Solutions University, a program of the Model Forest Policy Program and the Cumberland River Compact i Foreword The Norton Bay Inter-Tribal Watershed Council (NBITWC), the Model Forest Policy Program (MFPP) and the Norton Bay Alaska Native Villages (Villages) have a shared vision to enhance the resiliency of our communities and watershed. In 2013, the NBITWC, in partnership with the Villages, took the leadership role to engage in the Climate Solution’s University (CSU) Plan Development Program created by the Model Forest Policy Program. The goal of CSU is to empower rural, underserved communities to become leaders in climate resilience using a cost effective distance learning program. This Climate Change Adaption Plan for the Norton Bay Watershed (CCAP) is the result of a year of community team effort, bringing in an array of stakeholders and expertise, building partnerships, extensive information gathering, critical thinking, and engaged planning. The result is a localized, actionable plan that the Norton Bay community and supporters can implement in the coming years. The outcome will be a community that has strengthened capacity to be resilient to the inevitable impacts of climate change- a community with the awareness, shared vision, and partnerships to enable it to have the capacity to withstand the impacts of climate upon the natural resources, economy, and community. Acknowledgements The NBITWC would like to acknowledge the following who contributed to development of this plan: The Model Forest Policy Program The Cumberland River Compact The Native Villages of: Elim, Shaktoolik, Unalakleet and Koyuk Climate Solutions University would not have been possible without the major funding of The Kresge Foundation and other funders, which allowed us to develop the in-depth curriculum and provide grants for local community participation. The development of this plan was made possible by the guidance and coaching of the Climate Solutions University: Forest and Water Strategies program (CSU), created by the Model Forest Policy Program in partnership with the Cumberland River Compact and the assistance of Headwaters Economics. The team that leads the CSU program includes: Nancy Gilliam, Gwen Griffith, Todd Crossett, Toby Thaler, Margaret Hall, Jeff Morris, Alyx Perry, Ray Rasker, Vanitha Sivarajan, Mike Johnson and Josh Dye. Suggested citation: Murray, E., Ryan, J., Shepherd, H. & Thaler, T., Griffith, G., Crossett, T., Rasker, R. (Eds). 2013. Climate Adaptation and Action Plan for the Norton Bay Watershed, Alaska, Model Forest Policy Program in association with Norton Bay Inter-Tribal Watershed Council, the Cumberland River Compact and Headwaters Economics; Sagle, ID. i Available for download from: www.mfpp.org Date of publication: December, 2013 © 2013 Model Forest Policy Program Authors Emily Murray Project Coordinator, Norton Bay Inter-Tribal Watershed Council Hal Shepherd, Principal Jessica Ryan, Climate Consultant Laoch Consulting Editors Gwen Griffith, Toby Thaler, Todd Crossett, and Ray Rasker Copyright It is the intent of the authors and copyright holder that this plan be implemented and used as a model for climate adaptation planning by other communities. Any part of plan may be reproduced without permission for non-commercial purposes provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context and the source of the material is clearly acknowledged by means of the above title, publisher, and date. The wide dissemination, reproduction, and use of the plan for non-commercial purposes are all encouraged. Users of the plan are requested to inform the Model Forest Policy Program at: Model Forest Policy Program, P.O. Box 328, Sagle, Idaho 83860 [email protected], (509) 432-8679; www.mfpp.org No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Model Forest Policy Program. Disclaimer The material in this publication does not imply the opinion, endorsement, views, or policies of the Model Forest Policy Program, the Cumberland River Compact or Headwaters Economics. ii Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 a. Community Introduction .................................................................................................. 7 b. Climate Overview .......................................................................................................... 10 c. Early Signs of Climate Change in Alaska...................................................................... 14 d. Why Adaptation Planning is Important ......................................................................... 23 III. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 25 a. Description of the Economy .......................................................................................... 25 b. Economics Resources Law and Policy .......................................................................... 28 c. Rural Alaska................................................................................................................... 30 d. Wild Food Harvest Levels ............................................................................................. 31 e. Subsistence Economy with Cash Overlay ..................................................................... 31 f. The Relationship between the Economy and Climate Change ...................................... 32 g. Economics Risk Factors ................................................................................................. 34 IV. FOREST RESOURCE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 37 a. Contemporary Landscape – Forest History, Current Conditions and Trends ................ 37 b. Forest Impact Findings – Current Ecological Stressors and Ecosystem Responses ...... 46 c. Forest Resources Law and Policy .................................................................................. 56 V. WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ......................................................... 64 Water Resource Stakeholders .............................................................................................. 64 a. Water Quantity, Quality, and Diversity of Aquatic Habitats ......................................... 64 b. Fishery and Wildlife Resources ..................................................................................... 66 c. Ecosystem Integrity ....................................................................................................... 69 d. Indigenous Cultures ....................................................................................................... 70 e. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 71 f. Water Risk Findings ...................................................................................................... 75 g. Water Law and Policies ................................................................................................. 78 VI. ADAPTATION ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................ 87 Team and Strategic Analysis Process .................................................................................. 87 Assessment Findings - Summary and Recommendations ................................................... 87 Goals, Objectives, Strategies ............................................................................................... 90 iii VII. CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ....................................... 96 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................................ 96 Outcomes Anticipated from Implementation of the Plan .................................................... 96 VIII. APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................... 98 APPENDIX A: Year One Activities List........................................................................... 98 APPENDIX B: Native Village Employment Data ............................................................ 99 APPENDIX C: Native Village Income Data and Poverty Levels .................................... 107 APPENDIX D: Planning Team and Advisors .................................................................. 118 APPENDIX E: Community Readiness SWOT Analysis ................................................ 120 iv I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While many people still debate the existence of climate change and even those who have accepted that it has reality believe that climate change is a phenomenon of the future, Alaska is already feeling the effects of our rapidly changing world. During the fall of 2013, for example, the state continued to experience record high temperatures when Anchorage recorded an all-time high of 51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconnaissance for Radioactive Deposits in the Darby Mountains, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, 1948
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 300 RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 By Walter S. West This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is publhhed with the psnnission of the Commission. Washington. D. C., 1963 Frec on application to the Geolo~icalSurvey, Washington 26, D. C. RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ..................................... 1 Geology-Continued Introduction .................................. 1 Mineral deposits.. ...................... 3 Geology ..................................... 2 Radioactivity investigations. .................. 3 Undivided metamorphic rocks. ............ 2 Kachauik Creek-Cheenik Rocks of Paleozoic age.. ................. 2 Creekarea ........................... 4 Greenstone and greenstone schist ......... 2 McKinley Creek-Bryan Creek area ....... 4 Undivided igneous complex ............... 2 Portage Creek-Cape Darby area.. ......... 4 Granite ................................. 2 Norton Bay coastal area between Ungalik conglomerate. ................... 2 Cape Darby and Kwiniuk River ......... 5 Basalt .................................. 3 Kwiniuk River. ......................... 5 Unconsolidated deposits.. ................ 3 'Tubutulik River area.. ................... 6 Hot springs ............................. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2013-3
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seasonal Migrations and Essential Habitats of Broad Whitefish, Humpback Whitefish, and Least Cisco in the Selawik River Delta, as Inferred from Radiotelemetry Data, 2004–2006 Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2013-3 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska April 2013 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Region, 1987
    Fishery Management Report No. 91-1 Annual Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Region, 1987 William D. Arvey, Michael J. Kramer, Jerome E. Hallberg, James F. Parker, and Alfred L. DeCicco April 1991 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY MANAGEMENT REPORT NO. 91-1 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR SPORT FISHERIES IN THE ARCTIC-YUKON-KUSKOKWIM REGION, 1987l William D. Arvey, Michael J. Kramer, Jerome E. Hallberg, James F. Parker, and Alfred L. DeCicco Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Anchorage, Alaska April 1991 Some of the data included in this report were collected under various jobs of project F-10-3 of the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K). TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES............................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES.............................................. V LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................... vii ABSTRACT ..................................................... 1 PREFACE...................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................. 3 TANANA AREA DESCRIPTION ...................................... 3 Geographic and Geologic Setting ......................... 3 Lake and Stream Development ............................. 10 Climate................................................. 13 Primary Species for Sport Fishing ....................... 13 Status and Harvest Trends of Wild Stocks ................ 13 Chinook Salmon ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Niukluk River Salmon Counting Tower Project Summary Report, 1999
    Niukluk River Salmon Counting Tower Project Summary Report, 1999 by Tom Kohler Alaska DepaIlment of Fish & Game Commercial Fisheries Division, AYK Region 333 RaspbelTY Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518-l599 Regional InFormational Report 1 No. 3AOO-09 January 2000 'The Regional Information Report Series was establi hed in 1987 to provide an information access systcm for all unpublished divisional reports. 1l1ese reports frequently scrve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate timely rcporting of rccently collected information. reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data: this infonnation may be subsequently finalized and published in thc formal literature. Cons quently. tl1ese reports should not be cited without prior approval of tl1e author or the Commercial Fisheries Division. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables II List of Figures III Introduction 1 Objecti ves......................................................................................................... 1 Methods . Results 3 Discussion 4 Acknowledgments 6 Literature Cited........................................................................................................ 6 Tables 7 Figures 21 LIST OF TABLES I. Expanded daily and cumulative migration of all salmonid species past the 7 Niukluk River counting tower, orton Sound 1999 . 2. Expanded daily hourly chum salmon migration past the Niukluk River counting tower, Norton Sound, 1999 . 8 3. Expanded daily hourly pink salmon migration past the iukluk River counting tower, Norton Sound, 1999 . 9 4. Expanded daily hourly king salmon migration past the Niukluk River counting tower, NOlton Sound, 1999 .. 10 5. Expanded daily hourly coho salmon migration past the Niukluk River counting tower, Ol1on Sound, 1999 .. II 6. Expanded daily hourly Dolly Varden migration past the Niukluk River counting tower, NOIton Sound, 1999 .
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016-1191
    Prepared in cooperation with the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys GIS-Based Identification of Areas that have Resource Potential for Critical Minerals in Six Selected Groups of Deposit Types in Alaska Edited by Susan M. Karl, James V. Jones, III, and Timothy S. Hayes With contributions from Matthew Granitto, Timothy S. Hayes, James V. Jones, III, Susan M. Karl, Keith A. Labay, Jeffrey L. Mauk, Jeanine M. Schmidt, Nora B. Shew, Erin Todd, Bronwen Wang, Melanie B. Werdon, and Douglas B. Yager Open-File Report 2016–1191 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Karl, S.M., Jones, J.V., III, and Hayes, T.S., eds., 2016, GIS-based identification of areas that have resource potential for critical minerals in six selected groups of deposit types in Alaska: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Sound Golovin and Moses Point Subdistricts Chum Salmon Stock Status and Action Plan
    NORTON SOUND GOLOVIN AND MOSES POINT SUBDISTRICTS CHUM SALMON STOCK STATUS AND ACTION PLAN A Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries By: Jim Menard Daniel 1. Bergstrom Regional Information Report No. 3A03-36 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518 December 2003 I The Rcgioo31lnforrnatioo Rl,.-port Series was cslablished in 1987 (0 provide an infonnatioo access system for aU wlpublished divisional reports. Th(.'SC reports frequelllly SCI"'tC diverse ad hoc infonnationa.l purpooes or archive basic uninlcrprcted data. To accommodmc needs for up-t(}{laIC infonn.1tion, rt.-p<>rts in this !.(..";es may contain preliminary d'lta; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the fannal literature. onscqucntly, theM: reports should nOl be ciled without prior approval oCthe aulllor of tile Division ofCommercial Fisheries. AUTHORS Jim Menard is the Area Management Biologist for the Norton Sound -P rt Clarence Area and the Kotzebue Area, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, DiVIsion of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 1148, Nome, AK 99762. Daniel 1. Bergstrom is the AYK Regional Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 333 RaspbelTY Road, Anchorage, AK 99518. OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (OEO) STATEMENT The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs an activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, reli ion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all pr grams and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title [)( of the Education Amendments of 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • V)ISVI]V Jaqwnn +Uawnooo ;:Un+Ua 1\ Lu!Of Bul!Sns @@®W@ID O W~MW{}{L
    i 1 , . .... "~ sa:J!AldS ldp-eqJ pu~ lOtU.NO~ l.N3V\IO::lOG . ) ~OScJ}I/ifufqS~tJ~JJOc!S OJ.. u.ml.aH asea1d l . '~~ ~ ·---*-"to!'< • • '1~}'~1';:>'·-.~-z::_-'", V)ISVI]V JaqwnN +uawnooo ;:un+Ua 1\ lU!Of BUl!SnS @@®W@ID o W~MW{}{l .. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Sport Fish Division Jay S. Hammond, Governor t r-- " •' .! STATE OF AJ,.4SIU\ \) .. ·J:.y s, Hammond, Govf}Cnor t l } ,r ~ " ,.r -t'' L :.~ DJ:PARTMENT: OF 'FISH:.ANO .. GAME:.· 1, f f . ·.Ronald O._Skoog, Commlaaloner ) I( ·~~ ! . ~~ ~ .. t ·'' -~. :-""'.' ~ ~ ·.• ... ~~. SPORT FISH [IIVISION ... ·... ,.;"!. .. ... ,. .- 'Rup.,-t E. An~r•v~a, Director .· · d ·' ',' . ~ · Thls.bQOkJ~t ls_tritended, a{a~!~~tory of. sport ff~hlng r~sorts and charter.. services in -Alaska and ~~es rrQ~ co~stltute endprsem~nt; py th~ "'- dO, ~ ' " ~ " l .. Stat$ of· ·Afaska. Additional Information and prices may be'obtalried b¥ writ!ng diF~cJiyto the operators listed. · ·· ' ,. I ~ • ,, .~ } ••• spoit':flshln~ license Is req~JI;ed'al1c.t'must~ b~ hi the posseslon ~f. all 'persons 16 y.ears of age an~·oider while flshrn~.Jn tM State. r· ' ..... ·. ~ ' .. · '., .. ,.,. t .. -Licehs$~ .maY. be purcHased~ by· maillrorn "the b'epartment of.Fif}venue, 'Ffsh- and. Gam& Llcens~ Olvislon, 240 South franklin. Stre~t: . ::4u~e.au •. Aias~~998Q1. T11.ey ~re ~rso ~Sold by Ucense..v~~~ors In cUtes-throughout th~ ,State. The yew.ly ~oqreslder;Jt sport fisliing. Hcerist:. · ·~}, ... : ,· ··: ' ". " .. ,. ~ fee Is $30: .how~ver., ~ speQ.Ial1-:day vll?itor'$ollcensemaybe .pur'chased tot ~5 or a 1O.:day vlsitor~s .lfc;e.nse fqr·$15.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance for Radioactive Deposits in the Darby Mountains Seward Peninsula, Alaska 1948
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 300 RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA 1948 This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay> Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 300 RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 By Walter S. West This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission. Washington, D. C., 1953 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 By Walter S. West CONTENTS Page Page Abstract..................................... 1 Geology Continued Introduction. ................................. 1 Mineral deposits. ................ Geology ..................................... 2 Radioactivity investigations............ Undivided metamorphic rocks............. 2 Kachauik Creek-Cheenik Rocks of Paleozoic age. .................. 2 Creek area.................... Greenstone and greenstone schist McKinley Creek-Bryan Creek area Undivided igneous complex ...... Portage Creek-Cape Darby area... Granite........................ Norton Bay coastal area between Ungalik conglomerate........... Cape Darby and Kwiniuk River .. Basalt......................... Kwiniuk River ............
    [Show full text]
  • THE AGGIE CREEK METEORITE from SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA* Enwann P
    THE AGGIE CREEK METEORITE FROM SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA* Enwann P. Hnwonnsox, U. S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. This iron meteorite, reported to weigh about 95 pounds (43.18 kg.), was found on Aug. ll, 1942, during a gold dredging operation in Aggie Creek, Alaska, (Lat.640 53' N., Long. 163010, W.) by Mr. F. K. Dent of the Council Dredging Co., Nome, Alaska. The first information that the united states National Museum had of this meteorite came from Mr. Eskil Anderson of the university of Alaska, who after visiting the meteorite display came to the office to ask if we had any record of this discovery. Some time later the U. S. National Museum obtained a 968 gram sample of this iron as a gift from Mr. Stuart H. Perry, who had acquired the specimenfrom Mr. Dent. The following information concerning the location and conditions under which this iron was discovered was supplied by Mr. Dent. This meteorite was found while dredging Aggie creek for gold and was very close to bedrock when the dredge bucket picked it up. Bedrock at this point was about 12 feet deep from the surface. Aggie creek is on Seward peninsula, Alaska, and is a tributary to Fish River which empties into Golovin Bay about 90 miles southeast of Nome. rt will be easy to locate Fish River and by following up this river about 40 miles you will find the Niukluk River empties into Fish River on the left side going up, and about 15 miles on up Fish River you will find Aggie creek which flows into Fish River on the right side going up.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports on Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958
    t Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 By PAUL E. SOISTER and DORA R. CONKLIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THOMAS B. NOLAN, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Index No. Page Introduction _.__________________________ 1 Reports and authors listed________________ 1 Method of listing reports_________________ 1 Explanation of area and subject index_.______ 2 Acknowledgments .. __ 3 Availability of reports__.________________ 3 Depositories of U.S. Geological Survey open-file reports ________________________ 4 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports in the United States __._ 6 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports outside the United States__ 9 Reports ____________-__________________ 11 U.S. Geological Survey publications.. _ 1-760 11 Bulletins ._______________________ 1-112 11 Circulars _.._ ..____ _-___ ._.___.._ 200-297 20 Professional papers .__.. _..._...._-____.___ 300-398 25 Maps and reports -__-___._.________ 400-760 33 Coal investigations maps .
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon and Kuskokwim Whitefish Strategic Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Whitefish Biology, Distribution, and Fisheries in the Yukon and Kuskokwim River Drainages in Alaska: a Synthesis of Available Information Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2012-4 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska May 2012 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Restoration Plan for Norton Sound Salmon
    Research and Restoration Plan for Norton Sound Salmon Working Draft September 26, 2002 (as revised through February 18, 2003) Prepared by the Scientific Technical Committee For the Norton Sound Steering Committee Working Draft: Research and Restoration Plan for Norton Sound Salmon 2/18/03 SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Milo Adkison, Assistant Professor, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Juneau, Alaska. Linda K. Brannian, Regional Research Supervisor for the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Region of the Division of Commercial Fisheries, ADF&G, Anchorage, Alaska. Russell R. Holder, Fisheries Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fairbanks Alaska. Michael Link, Fisheries Biologist, LGL Limited, Victoria, Canada. Phillip R. Mundy (Chair), Fisheries Scientist, Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Office, State of Alaska, Anchorage. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The committee gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Gene Sandone, Charlie Lean, Steve McGee, Mac McLean, Jim Magdanz, and the members of the Steering Committee. We also wish to acknowledge Matt Nemeth for his assistance to the committee in drafting sections of this plan involving the life cycle of sockeye and pink salmon and the marine stage of coho salmon, and for his work on the literature cited and the preparation of the electronic bibliography on which it is based. PROJECT SPONSORSHIP Preparation of the Research and Restoration Plan for Norton Sound Salmon was partially financed by the Fishery Disaster Relief Program granted after the Norton Sound Fishery Disaster, contract NA16FW1272 to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. This grant is administered under the Norton Sound Research and Restoration Memorandum of Understanding. ii Working Draft: Research and Restoration Plan for Norton Sound Salmon 2/18/03 OEO/ADA STATEMENT The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability.
    [Show full text]