DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports on Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports on Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 t Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 By PAUL E. SOISTER and DORA R. CONKLIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THOMAS B. NOLAN, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Index No. Page Introduction _.__________________________ 1 Reports and authors listed________________ 1 Method of listing reports_________________ 1 Explanation of area and subject index_.______ 2 Acknowledgments .. __ 3 Availability of reports__.________________ 3 Depositories of U.S. Geological Survey open-file reports ________________________ 4 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports in the United States __._ 6 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports outside the United States__ 9 Reports ____________-__________________ 11 U.S. Geological Survey publications.. _ 1-760 11 Bulletins ._______________________ 1-112 11 Circulars _.._ ..____ _-___ ._.___.._ 200-297 20 Professional papers .__.. _..._...._-____.___ 300-398 25 Maps and reports -__-___._.________ 400-760 33 Coal investigations maps . _. 400-405 33 Geologic quadrangle maps _____ _. 406-423 33 Geophysical investigations maps.__._.___ 424-432 34 Mineral investigations field studies maps 433-532 35 Mineral investigations resource appraisals map _.._._____ __ _.___ 533 40 Miscellaneous geologic investigations maps.... 534-755 41 Oil and gas investigations maps___ __._ 756-757 51 Strategic minerals investigations maps and reports ___ ._ .__ ___ 758-760 51 U.S. Geological Survey maps and reports released in open file ..._ ._._ _._.__. ...________ 800-950 51 U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission special publication . _...._. ___ 1000 60 U.S. Geological Survey reports issued by Technical Information Service Extension of U.S. Atomic Energy Commission ._ ._.._._ 1500-1807 60 Trace Elements investigations reports-. __ 1500-1604 60 Trace Elements memorandum reports ___- 1750-1797 66 Raw Materials Exploration reports by the U.S. Bureau of Mines and the U.S. Geological Survey _________________._____ 1800-1807 69 III IV CONTENTS Index No. Page Articles in scientific journals and books 2000-2422 70 Abstracts _________________________ 2000-2189 70 Bulletin, American Association of Petroleum Geologists -_-- - 2000-2001 70 Transactions, American Geophysical Union_ 2002-2003 70 Economic Geology ........___ __ 2004-2034 70 Bulletin, Geological Society of America. 2035-2181 71 Science ._ 2182-2185 78 Miscellaneous journals - - - 2186-2189 79 Full papers and chapters. - 2190-2422 79 Acta Crystallographica _.___.____._.__ 2190-2191 79 Bulletin, American Association of Petroleum Geologists ____._______________ 2192-2199 79 Transactions, American Geophysical Union.. 2200-2201 80 Transactions, American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers _..._ 2202-2203 80 American Journal of Science. _ _. 2204-2211 80 American Mineralogist ._ ..-_ 2212-2259 81 Analytica Chimica Acta_ __._._ .___....__. 2260-2261 83 Analytical Chemistry ________________ 2262-2277 83 California State Division of Mines Special Reports _.......__ ________ 2278-2280 84 Colorado Mining Association publications . 2281-2283 84 Economic Geology. _ . _ ___... 2284-2305 85 Engineering and Mining Journal _ , 2306-2307 86 Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta _ 2308-2320 86 Bulletin, Geological Society of America ..... 2321-2329 87 Geophysics _ _ 2330-2331 87 Intermountain Association of Petroleum Ge­ ologists Guidebook 2332-2341 88 Journal of Sedimentary Petrology_...__._ 2342-2346 88 Mines Magazine 2347-2349 89 Mining Engineering ........___..._...._____ 2350-2352 89 Advances in Nuclear Engineering 2d Nu­ clear Engineering and Science Proceedings 2353-2356 89 Second Nuclear Engineering and Science Conference _ _.._._ _ ...._._.___. 2357-2359 89 Nuclear Geology A Symposium on Nuclear Phenomena in the Earth Sciences____._ 2360-2367 90 International Geological Congress, 19th, Al­ giers 1952, Comptes rendus____.__.__ 2368-2370 90 Review of Scientific Instruments ,- 2371-2372 90 Science ___ __.. ...._...__.__.._.._. 2373-2382 90 Texas University Bureau of Economic Ge­ ology Report ____________ ___._ 2383-2384 91 Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey.... 2385 91 Utah Geological Society, Guidebook to the Geology of Utah __..______._.______ 2386-2388 91 Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook 2389-2392 91 Miscellaneous journals 2393-2422 91 CONTENTS V Page Indexes _._._._____..___________________ 95 Author index ___._____________________ 95 Area and subject index__________________ 103 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM BIBLIOGRAPHY OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RE- PORTS ON URANIUM AND THORIUM, 1942 THROUGH MAY 1958 By PAUL E. SOISTER and DORA R. CONKLIN INTRODUCTION REPORTS AND AUTHORS LISTED Most of the items listed in this bibliography were prepared originally as unpublished reports by the U.S. Geological Sur­ vey for the Division of Raw Materials and the Division of Re­ search of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and subsequently released to the public during the period from 1942 through May 1958. The bibliography includes Geological Survey publications and open-file reports, Atomic Energy Commission releases of Sur­ vey reports, and articles by Survey authors in scientific journals and books. A few of the Geological Survey publications are by non-Geological Survey authors or coauthors. This report does not include abstracts published in "Chemical Abstracts," "Geo* logical Abstracts," "Geophysical Abstracts," "Nuclear Science Abstracts," or other abstract journals. Most of these reports concern the geology, mineralogy, or chemistry of uranium or thorium; but some are on beryllium, lithium, and other rare elements of interest in the atomic en­ ergy program. METHOD OF LISTING REPORTS The unpublished reports prepared by the Geological Survey for the Atomic Energy Commission were numbered into three of the many Atomic Energy Commission identification code series. These three series are TEI (Trace Elements Investigations re­ port), TEM (Trace Elements Memorandum report), and RME (Raw Materials Exploration report). Only eight Geological Sur­ vey reports are in the RME series. TEI, TEM, and RME num- 2 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM bers are used in this bibliography only where such numbers are used to identify reports. Each report listed is given an index number. Entries in the author index and the area and subject index refer to the reports by these index numbers. Reports published by the Geological Survey (Index Nos. 1-760) are listed by type of publication (bulletins, circulars, professional papers, and maps) and in numerical order without Atomic En­ ergy Commission series numbers. Reports released in open file (Index Nos. 800-950) are listed alphabetically by authors, and the TEI and TEM numbers are included for those reports that have been given numbers. Trace Elements reports that have been issued by the Techni­ cal Information Service Extension of the Atomic Energy Com­ mission (Index Nos. 1500-1807) are listed numerically by TEI, TEM, and RME numbers. (A few early Trace Elements reports were issued by the Atomic Energy Commission in the code series AECD and MDDC. They are listed here under the TEI or TEM number, but the proper identifying code number also is given after the title.) Articles in scientific journals and books (Index Nos. 2000- 2422) are separated into (a) abstracts and (b) full papers and chapters. The articles are listed alphabetically by author under a chronologic listing of each journal. Articles appearing in jour­ nals which contain only one pertinent Geological Survey paper are listed alphabetically by author under "Miscellaneous jour­ nals" at the end of each of the two sections. Atomic Energy Com­ mission series numbers are not used for articles published in journals. EXPLANATION OF AREA AND SUBJECT INDEX In the index most of the areas and subjects are listed under States, "Colorado Plateau," "United States," or under a few sub­ ject categories. Information on areas outside the United States and Territories is listed by continent under "Foreign deposits." Under many subjects, such as "Structure" and "Guides to uranium deposits," the reports listed are only those in which these subjects are of major interest. Following is a list of most of the major headings used: Analytical methods and research Geochemistry and petrology Mineralogy, crystallography, and petrography Reconnaissance or prospecting for radioactive materials U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORTS URANIUM, THORIUM 3 State: Airborne radioactivity surveys Areas and districts Counties Maps, geologic Maps, photogeologic Mineralogy Minerals containing uranium, thorium, or high radioactivity Mines, prospects, and properties Rocks and materials containing uranium, thorium, or high radioactivity Stratigraphic and other rock units containing uranium, thorium, or high radioactivity Stratigraphy Thoroughness of indexing varies with type of report. In gen­ eral, reports that were not written specifically for the atomic energy program of the Geological Survey have been indexed from the titles only. Also, separate maps have been indexed by title only; therefore, areas, counties, mines, and other items on these maps may not be indicated in the index. Many of the longer reports contain their own indexes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Much of the material in this report has been taken from pub­ lished and unpublished Geological Survey bibliographies com­ piled by Virginia K. Blatcher, Mary D. Bowman, Diane Curtis, Shirley S. Houser, Harriet B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 Utah
    2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan UTAH STATE PARKS Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation Planning Section 1594 West North Temple, Ste. 116 P.O. Box 146001 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-6001 (877) UT-PARKS stateparks.utah.gov State of Utah Figure 1. Public land ownership in Utah. ii 2014 SCORP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research and publication of the 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) is a product of a team effort. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Department of Transportation, Utah Division of Water Resources, Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, National Park Service (Omaha Regional Office), U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Utah League of Cities and Towns, Utah Association of Counties, Utah Recreation and Parks Association, and others provided data, information, advice, recommendations, and encouragement. The 2014 Utah SCORP was completed under contract by BIO-WEST, Inc. (BIO-WEST), with survey work completed by Dan Jones & Associates. Key project contributors include Gary Armstrong, project manager for BIO-WEST, and David Howard, lead survey research associate for Dan Jones & Associates. Susan Zarekarizi of the Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation served as the overall project manager and provided contractor oversight. Additional staff contributing to the project include Sean Keenan of BIO-WEST, and Tyson Chapman and Kjersten Adams of Dan Jones & Associates. The 2014 Utah SCORP represents demand for future recreation facilities as identified in a series of public opinion surveys, special reports, park surveys, federal and local plans, technical reports, and other data.
    [Show full text]
  • B2158 Pt 19 Text Copy
    Previous section Volume contents Appendix A Around the Henry Mountains with Charlie Hanks, Some Recollections By Charles B. Hunt1 It was my good fortune in 1935 to be assigned chief of a U.S. Geological Survey field party studying and mapping the geology of the Henry Mountains, Utah (fig. 1). Geolog- ically the area is of great interest because of the classic work done there in 1876 by G.K. Gilbert for the Powell Survey. In the 1930’s the area still was frontier (fig. 2)—a long distance from railroads, paved roads, telephones, stores, or medical services. It was the heart of an area the size of New York State without a railroad, and a third of that area was without any kind of a road. This was not Marlboro country; it was Bull Durham country. The geological work had to be done by pack train (fig. 3); it was about the last of the big pack- train surveys in the West—the end of an era. It was my good fortune also to obtain the services of a veteran horseman who knew that country, Charles R. Hanks of Green River, Utah (fig. 4). Charlie served as packer dur- ing each of our five field seasons there. He had played a leading role in the history of the area; the town of Hanks- ville was named (1885) for his father when a post office was established there. Charlie, an old-time cow puncher, had spent more hours in saddles than he had in chairs, and he had slept more nights on the ground under the stars than he had in bed under a roof.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance for Radioactive Deposits in the Darby Mountains, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, 1948
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 300 RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 By Walter S. West This report concerns work done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is publhhed with the psnnission of the Commission. Washington. D. C., 1963 Frec on application to the Geolo~icalSurvey, Washington 26, D. C. RECONNAISSANCE FOR RADIOACTIVE DEPOSITS IN THE DARBY MOUNTAINS, SEWARD PENINSULA, ALASKA, 1948 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ..................................... 1 Geology-Continued Introduction .................................. 1 Mineral deposits.. ...................... 3 Geology ..................................... 2 Radioactivity investigations. .................. 3 Undivided metamorphic rocks. ............ 2 Kachauik Creek-Cheenik Rocks of Paleozoic age.. ................. 2 Creekarea ........................... 4 Greenstone and greenstone schist ......... 2 McKinley Creek-Bryan Creek area ....... 4 Undivided igneous complex ............... 2 Portage Creek-Cape Darby area.. ......... 4 Granite ................................. 2 Norton Bay coastal area between Ungalik conglomerate. ................... 2 Cape Darby and Kwiniuk River ......... 5 Basalt .................................. 3 Kwiniuk River. ......................... 5 Unconsolidated deposits.. ................ 3 'Tubutulik River area.. ................... 6 Hot springs ............................. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
    [Show full text]
  • Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides from the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives
    Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives Isolation of Uranium Mill Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives By Edward Landa GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 814 A critical review of the literature dealing with uranium mill tailings, with emphasis on the geologic and geochemical processes affecting the long-term containment of radionuclides 1980 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 79-600148 Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------­ 1 Acknowledginents ---------_----------------------------------------------- 2 Quantity and location of the tailings --------------------------------------­ 2 Radioactivity in tailings --------------------------------------------------­ 4 Sources of potential human radiation exposure from uranium mill tailings ------ 6 Radon emanation ----------------------------------------------------- 6 VVind transport ------------------------------------------------------- 6 Surface water transport and leaching ----------------------------------- 7 External gamma radiation -------------------------------------------­ 8 Contamination of terrestrial and aquatic vegetation ---------------------- 8 Seepage ----------------------------------------------------~--------
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • NPR81: South Korea's Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel
    JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON Viewpoint South Korea’s Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel Reprocessing JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON1 Dr. Jungmin Kang was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (CEES), Princeton University in 1999-2000. He is the author of forthcoming articles in Science & Global Security and Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. Dr. H.A. Feiveson is a Senior Research Scientist at CEES and a Co- director of Princeton’s research Program on Nuclear Policy Alternatives. He is the Editor of Science and Global Security, editor and co-author of The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-alerting of Nuclear Weapons (Brookings Institution, 1999), and co-author of Ending the Threat of Nuclear Attack (Stanford University Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1997). rom the beginning of its nuclear power program could reduce dependence on imported uranium. During in the 1970s, the Republic of Korea (South Ko- the 1990s, the South Korean government remained con- Frea) has been intermittently interested in the cerned about energy security but also began to see re- reprocessing of nuclear-power spent fuel. Such repro- processing as a way to address South Korea’s spent fuel cessing would typically separate the spent fuel into three disposal problem. Throughout this entire period, the constituent components: the unfissioned uranium re- United States consistently and effectively opposed all maining in the spent fuel, the plutonium produced dur- reprocessing initiatives on nonproliferation grounds. We ing reactor operation, and the highly radioactive fission review South Korea’s evolving interest in spent fuel re- products and transuranics other than plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    CAL – CAL GENERAL INDEX CACOXENITE United States Prospect quarry (rhombs to 3 cm) 25:189– Not verified from pegmatites; most id as strunzite Arizona 190p 4:119, 4:121 Campbell shaft, Bisbee 24:428n Unanderra quarry 19:393c Australia California Willy Wally Gully (spherulitic) 19:401 Queensland Golden Rule mine, Tuolumne County 18:63 Queensland Mt. Isa mine 19:479 Stanislaus mine, Calaveras County 13:396h Mt. Isa mine (some scepter) 19:479 South Australia Colorado South Australia Moonta mines 19:(412) Cresson mine, Teller County (1 cm crystals; Beltana mine: smithsonite after 22:454p; Brazil some poss. melonite after) 16:234–236d,c white rhombs to 1 cm 22:452 Minas Gerais Cripple Creek, Teller County 13:395–396p,d, Wallaroo mines 19:413 Conselheiro Pena (id as acicular beraunite) 13:399 Tasmania 24:385n San Juan Mountains 10:358n Renison mine 19:384 Ireland Oregon Victoria Ft. Lismeenagh, Shenagolden, County Limer- Last Chance mine, Baker County 13:398n Flinders area 19:456 ick 20:396 Wisconsin Hunter River valley, north of Sydney (“glen- Spain Rib Mountain, Marathon County (5 mm laths donite,” poss. after ikaite) 19:368p,h Horcajo mines, Ciudad Real (rosettes; crystals in quartz) 12:95 Jindevick quarry, Warregul (oriented on cal- to 1 cm) 25:22p, 25:25 CALCIO-ANCYLITE-(Ce), -(Nd) cite) 19:199, 19:200p Kennon Head, Phillip Island 19:456 Sweden Canada Phelans Bluff, Phillip Island 19:456 Leveäniemi iron mine, Norrbotten 20:345p, Québec 20:346, 22:(48) Phillip Island 19:456 Mt. St-Hilaire (calcio-ancylite-(Ce)) 21:295– Austria United States
    [Show full text]
  • EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Committee
    EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Committee EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Mid-Year Committee Report Michael D. Campbell, P.G., P.H., Chair December 12, 2011 Vice-Chairs: Robert Odell, P.G., (Vice-Chair: Industry), Consultant, Casper, WY Steven N. Sibray, P.G., (Vice-Chair: University), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE Robert W. Gregory, P.G., (Vice-Chair: Government), Wyoming State Geological Survey, Laramie, WY Advisory Committee: Henry M. Wise, P.G., Eagle-SWS, La Porte, TX Bruce Handley, P.G., Environmental & Mining Consultant, Houston, TX James Conca, Ph.D., P.G., Director, Carlsbad Research Center, New Mexico State U., Carlsbad, NM Fares M Howari, Ph.D., University of Texas of the Permian Basin, Odessa, TX Hal Moore, Moore Petroleum Corporation, Norman, OK Douglas C. Peters, P.G., Consultant, Golden, CO Arthur R. Renfro, P.G., Senior Geological Consultant, Cheyenne, WY Karl S. Osvald, P.G., Senior Geologist, U.S. BLM, Casper WY Jerry Spetseris, P.G., Consultant, Austin, TX Committee Activities During the past 6 months, the Uranium Committee continued to monitor the expansion of the nuclear power industry and associated uranium exploration and development in the U.S. and overseas. New power-plant construction has begun and the country is returning to full confidence in nuclear power as the Fukushima incident is placed in perspective. India, Africa and South America have recently emerged as serious exploration targets with numerous projects offering considerable merit in terms of size, grade, and mineability. During the period, the Chairman traveled to Columbus, Ohio to make a presentation to members of the Ohio Geological Society on the status of the uranium and nuclear industry in general (More).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Baby Doe Tabor Is a Timeless Figure in Colorado History
    Baby Doe Tabor: Colorado’s Legend “When Baby Doe first saw the mountains, she had an inexplicable feeling that her destiny was bound up in those distant granite fortresses.” 1 Baby Doe Tabor is a timeless figure in Colorado history. Her story has been committed to film, opera, and literature time and again. Although there are many parts that are the same in the various renditions of her story. There are three critical parts that are all perceived differently across time; her life in Central City prior to meeting Horace Tabor, her relationship and life with Horace, and her long and lonely vigil at the Matchless Mine in Leadville, Colorado after Horace’s death. These three are perceived differently largely based upon the fact that the authors craft their language so as to present the reader with different perspectives on the event. 1 Gordon Langley Hall, The Two Lives of Baby Doe (Philadelphia: Macrae Smith Co., 1962), 69. 1 Because of continual retelling Baby Doe’s story remains an integral part of Colorado’s history. What is it about her that makes her such an important and timeless figure? Why are authors and historians so fascinated with her? Her story begins simply enough. Elizabeth Bonduel Nellis McCourt was born in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Her official birth date has never been agreed upon, as the official records were destroyed in a fire when she was a teenager. She was christened on October 7, 1854 when she was estimated to be about 12 days old.2 She first arrived in Colorado in 1877 on the arm of her new husband Harvey Doe; they settled themselves in Central City to work some mining claims belonging to Harvey Doe Senior.
    [Show full text]