DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Integrated Development Plan 2015/16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Integrated Development Plan 2015/16 DRAFT INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2015/16 1 |RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP FOR 2015/16 List of Abbreviations AET Adult Education and Training ARV Anti-retroviral BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa CAI Consultancy Africa Intelligence CD Cerebrovascular disease CFVI Consumer Financial Vulnerability Index COGTA Cooperative Governance of Traditional Affairs CoJ City of Johannesburg CoT City of Tshwane DD Diarrhoeal disease DM Diabetes mellitus EAP Economically Active Population EPWP Expanded Public Works Programme EU European Union FET Further Education and Training FHS Fires, hot substances GDP Gross Domestic Product GDP-R Gross Domestic Product by Region GP Gauteng Province GVA Gross Value Added G8 The Group of Eight Industrialised Nations (France, West Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Russia) HDI Human Development Index HEIs Higher Education Institutions 2 |RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP FOR 2015/16 HHD Hypertensive heart disease HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome IHD Ischaemic heart disease ILO International Labour Organisation IMF International Monetary Fund IV Interpersonal violence LERs Learner to Educator Ratios LRI Lower respiratory infection MDG Millennium Development Goal M/E Meningitis/encephalitis Metros Metropolitan Municipalities MPC Monetary Policy Committee NCR National Credit Regulator NDP National Development Plan NEET Not in Employment, Education and Training NERSA National Energy Regulator of South Africa NQF National Qualification Framework NSDS National Skills Development Strategy OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PMTCT Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission PRB Population Reference Bureau QLFS Quarterly Labour Force Survey RDP Reconstruction and Development Programme RI Road injuries SADC Southern African Development Community SARB South African Reserve Bank SARS South African Revenues Services 3 |RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP FOR 2015/16 SERO Socio-Economic Review and Outlook SETA Sector Education and Training Authorities SGB School Governing Body SSA Sub-Saharan Africa Stats SA Statistics South Africa TB Tuberculosis TFR Total Fertility Rate UK United Kingdom UN United Nations USA United States of America WEO World Economic Outlook WPDS World Population Data Sheet YLL Years of Life Lost Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 9 4 |RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP FOR 2015/16 1.1. WHAT IS THE IDP FRAMEWORK PLAN? ................................................................................. 9 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 12 SECTION A: VISION ........................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Vision: ....................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Mission Statement .................................................................................................................... 17 2.3. MUNICIPAL CORE VALUES .................................................................................................... 17 3. SECTION B: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE MUNICIPALITY ................................................................ 19 3.1. LOCAL PROFILE ..................................................................................................................... 19 3.2. TOTAL POPULATION ................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.1. West Rand Population Distribution ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.2. Total population per group .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.3. Household income ...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.4. Employment by gender .................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.5. Housing ...................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.6. Age by Gender ........................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.7. POPULATION AS PER WARD................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3. ECONOMIC VIEW ...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3.1. ECONOMIC SIZE IN 2012: ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3.2. EMPLOYMENT STATS .............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4. SECTION C: POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY .......................................................... 58 4.1. WHO IS THE EXECUTIVE? ..................................................................................................... 58 4.2. LIST OF RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY WARD COUNCILLORS ............................ 58 4.3. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES / INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................. 61 4.3.1. Randfontein Local Municipality ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.4. West Rand District Municipality .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.4.1. Provincial Government ............................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.4.2. Civil Society (Community and Other Stakeholders) .................................................................. 62 4.4.3. The IDP Steering Committee .................................................................................................... 64 4.4.4. The IDP Representative Forum ................................................................................................ 64 4.4.5. IDP Project Task Team ............................................................................................................. 64 5. SECTION D: PROCESS FOLLOWED TO DEVELOP THE IDP ..................................................................... 66 5.1. IDP PROCESS PLAN ............................................................................................................... 66 5 |RANDFONTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT IDP FOR 2015/16 5.2. MECHANISMS AND PROCEDURES FOR COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ...................................................................................................................................... 66 5.3. LEGAL AND POLICY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 82 5.4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND GOOD GOVERNANCE ......................................................... 84 5.5. COMMUNITY ISSUES 2013/14 IDP ......................................................................................... 85 6. SECTION E: SPATIAL ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE ..................................................... 101 6.1. The Randfontein Spatial Development Framework ................................................................ 101 6.1.1. Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 101 6.1.2. Terms of Reference ................................................................................................................ 102 6.1.3. The SDF consist of the following:- .......................................................................................... 102 6.1.3.1. SDF Objectives and Requirements......................................................................................... 102 6.1.4. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SDF INCLUDE: ......................................................................... 102 6.3. POPULATION AND GROWTH RATE .................................................................................... 103 6.4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 104 6.5. BUSINESS STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 106 6.5.1. CBD AREA ............................................................................................................................. 107 6.5.2. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................. 107 6.5.3. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 108 6.7. AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ................................................................................................ 109 6.7.1. HOUSING ............................................................................................................................... 109 6.7.2. MINING DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................... 110 6.7.2.1. HARMONY LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 110 6.8. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Race Relations in South Africa: 1968
    A survey of race relations in South Africa: 1968 http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.BOO19690000.042.000 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org A survey of race relations in South Africa: 1968 Author/Creator Horrell, Muriel Publisher South African Institute of Race Relations, Johannesburg Date 1969-01 Resource type Reports Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, South Africa, South Africa, South Africa, South Africa, Namibia Coverage (temporal) 1968 Source EG Malherbe Library Description A survey of race
    [Show full text]
  • 1-35556 3-8 Padp1 Layout 1
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA August Vol. 566 Pretoria, 3 2012 Augustus No. 35556 PART 1 OF 3 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure G12-088869—A 35556—1 2 No. 35556 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 3 AUGUST 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 35556 Menlyn..................................................... 3 35556 Applications concerning Operating
    [Show full text]
  • MSDF 2019 Annexure a IMPLEMENTATION
    MERAFONG CITY MUNICIPAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2019 ANNEXURE A IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK The Capital Expenditure Framework (CEF) as a component of the Municipal Spatial Development Framework (MSDF) is a requirement in terms of Section 21(n) of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 2013. The intention of the Capital Investment Framework (CIF) is to close the gap between the spatial strategy and implementation on the ground. This is to be achieved using the spatial strategy and the detail provided in the Municipal Spatial Development Framework as the basis upon which other sector plans can be built, thus ensuring integration through a shared platform. A Capital Expenditure Framework has 4 key components namely spatial alignment, quantification of growth, technical assessment and financial alignment. This is the first attempt at an improved Capital Expenditure Framework and whilst the spatial component has been completed satisfactorily, the financial and infrastructure components are not at a satisfactory level. The municipality strives to adopt the new Integrated Urban Development Grant (IUDG) and as such the infrastructure and financial components will have to be added in coming years. This attempt is seen as a base to start from and expand upon. Many of the calculations and information available has not been included and some of it, such as the human settlement calculations are included in other parts of the MSDF. The municipality has a very difficult task of balancing its budget between the needs of social development, economic development and urban efficiency. The needs of the present must also be weighed against sustainability and viability in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Merafong City Local Municipality Local Integrated Transport Plan (LITP)
    Merafong City Local Municipality Local Integrated Transport Plan (LITP) October 2018 SUMMARY SHEET Report Type Transportation Planning Title Report Framework: Merafong City Local Municipality – Local Integrated Transport Plan Location Merafong City Local Municipality Client West Rand District Municipality Reference Number ITS 3893 Project Team Dr Pieter Pretorius Florence Asiimwe Henri Vorster Charmaine Dladla Cobus Lotz Contact Details Tel: 012 349 1664 Date October 2018 Report Status Second Draft INNOVATIVE TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Legislation requirements ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3. Format of the LITP ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. TRANSPORT STATUS QUO .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Commuter Rail Facilities ............................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Mini-Bus Taxi Facilities ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Existing Provincial Road P16 Section 1 As
    STAATSKOERANT, 28 SEPTEMBER 2012 No. 35719 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 784 28 September 2012 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED Registration No: 98/09584/06 A. DECLARATION OF EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROAD- PROVINCIAL ROAD P16 SECTION 1 AS NATIONAL ROAD R24- DISTRICT OF RUSTENBURG, IN THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE By virtue of Section 40(1 )(a) of The South African National Road Agency Limited and National Roads Act 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby declare the Section of Route R24, also known as Provincial Road P16 Section 1, as declared by all Administrator's Notices which might be relevant to this section of road, commencing from its junction with Provincial District Road 0108, at Rustenburg, from where it proceeds in a general easterly direction along the existing Provincial Road P16 Section 1 up to the junction with the North-West!Gauteng Provincial Border, where it terminates as a National Road. (National Road R24: Rustenburg - North-West/Gauteng Provincial Border, a distance of approximately 31.4km) B. DECLARATION OF EXISTING PROVINCIAL ROADS- (I) PROVINCIAL ROAD P32 SECTION 2 , (II) PROVINCIAL ROAD P32 SECTION 1 AND (Ill) PROVINCIAL ROAD P20 SECTION 3 AS NATIONAL ROAD R30- DISTRICTS OF KLERKSDORP, VENTERSDORP, KOSTER AND RUSTENBURG, IN THE NORTH-WEST PROVINCE By virtue of Section 40(1 )(a) of The South African National Road Agency Limited and National Roads Act 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby declare: I) The Section of Route R30, also known as Provincial Road P32 Section 2, as declared by all Administrator's
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC of SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 567 Pretoria, 28 September 2012 No. 35719 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure G12-104928—A 35719—1 2 No. 35719 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 28 SEPTEMBER 2012 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. GOVERNMENT NOTICE GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWING Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Government Notice Goewermentskennisgewing 784 The South African National Road Agency 784 Wet op die Suid-Afrikaanse Nasionale Limited and National Roads Act Padagentskap Beperk en op Nasionale (7/1998): Declaration of existing provin- Paaie (7/1998): Verklaring van cial road—Provincial Road P16 Section bestaande provinsiale pad—Provinsiale 1 as National Road R24, District of Pad P16 Seksie 1 as Nasionale Pad Rustenburg, in the North West Province 3 35719 R24, distrik van Rustenburg, in die Noord-Wes Provinsie .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Assistance in South Africa: Its Potential Impact on Poverty
    Social assistance in South Africa: Its potential impact on poverty. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Development Studies at the Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape Supervisors: Prof. P. le Roux and Prof. R. Botman (Full text version but printed in smaller fonts) written by: Claudia Haarmann e-mail: [email protected] date: 30.08.2000 Acknowledgments II Acknowledgments I would like to use this opportunity to thank my promoters Pieter le Roux and Russel Botman for their extraordinary help, support and encouraging friendship during the whole process of this research. Many thanks to COSATU for initiating this research and for the debate about a comprehensive social security system in South Africa. Special thanks to the members of the reference group for their com- mitment: Oupa Bodibe, Kenneth Creamer, Neil Coleman, Sandy Liebenberg, Neva Makgetla, Ravi Naidoo, Viviene Taylor and Eddie Webster. The discussions, inputs and invaluable comments at the workshops were key to the success of this project. Thanks to Conrad Barberton, Jacqui Boulle, Kenneth Creamer, Tania Flood, Ute and Hanns Hedrich- Lessing, Sandy Liebenberg, Johann Magerman, and Alison Tilley. First of all for their very special friendship, but also for many critical discussions on the topic which were so essential for the research. Thanks to Murray Leibbrandt and James Midgley for making time to discuss the research and for their highly appreciated comments. To the chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Welfare, Cassim Saloojee: Thanks for the friend- ship, trust and encouragement throughout the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Costs Shrine
    newsnewsA publication of the Catholic Archdiocese of Johannesburg MSP Shrine Sod Celebrates Police Day Turning 5 25 years 6 9Celebrations Telephone (011) 402 6400 • www.catholicjhb.org.za APRIL 2017 ADAD he cost of the Mother of is a permanent and attractive. We Mercy Shrine in the Mag- The will also be building a cave grotto aliesburg has increased to and chapel at an additional T R4 million,” he said. R19 million. costs Explaining this at the Archdio- The key issue is how to raise this ExtensionExtension ofof churchchurch cesan Pastoral Council meeting, of the money. “We appealed to every Archbishop Buti Tlhagale said Catholic to donate R100 and this toto getget underwayunderway initially he wanted to raise R4 mil- has not worked – we only raised lion to construct some warehouse- shrine R2 million. People were not As Holy Rosary, Phiri prepares for the church extension project, the parish type buildings and R500 000 for responding”, he said. had its own sod-turning ceremony led by parish priest, Fr Victor Ngwenya ablutions as basics. explained The Archbishop said ‘Friends of on 5 March. “The church was to be consid- Rivonia church was R19 million the Shrine’ committees should be ered a luxury and would be built and only seats 800 people. The set up in parishes to assist with last. However, I was presented Mulbarton church cost R15 million fundraising. ‘Stop killing our law with a new design for a church and six years ago and the Bryanston Fr Gabriel Afagbegee SVD a multi-purpose hall at a cost of church R15 million 15 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • JB MARKS GV 2019 Township: Potchefstroom Farms
    JB MARKS GV 2019 Township: Potchefstroom Farms Municipal ID Allotment Township Erf Number Portion Property Description Owner Street No Street Name Deeds Extent Rates Category Market Value Short comment MP Number 1112 0000 00000000 0000 0000 000000 BUFFELSHOEK 682 IQ 682 0 682 KOEPEL WILDSPLAASPTY LTD PARYS RD 255 7177 AGRICULTURAL 5 300 000 1113 0000 00000000 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 0 RE/383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. CARLETONVILLE RD 155 5463 AGRICULTURAL 1 500 000 1113 0000 00000001 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 1 RE/-1/383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. RYSMIERBULT RD 306 4514 AGRICULTURAL 2 100 000 1113 0000 00000002 0000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 2 -2(-/-1)383 OOSTHUIZEN W J CARLETONVILLE RAILWAY LINE 30 0785 AGRICULTURAL 2 000 000 1113 0000 00000003 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 3 RE/-3/383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. CARLETONVILLE RAILWAY LINE 12 1428 AGRICULTURAL 10 000 1113 0000 00000004 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 4 RE/-4/373 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. CARLETONVILLE RAILWAY LINE 428 5101 PSI 3 300 000 P.S.I. DAM 1113 0000 00000006 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 6 RE/-6(-/-3)383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. CARLETONVILLE RAILWAY LINE 62 5640 PSI 800 000 P.S.I. DAM 1113 0000 00000007 0000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 7 -7(-/-3)383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A. CARLETONVILLE RD 426 4615 AGRICULTURAL 3 800 000 1113 0000 00000009 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 9 RE/-9(-/-1)383 OOSTHUIZEN W J CARLETONVILLE RD 48 1605 AGRICULTURAL 4 200 000 1113 0000 00000010 9000 0000 000000 BUFFELSVLEI 383 IQ 383 10 RE/-10(-/-1)383 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF R.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • BA and Empr for the Proposed Surface Pipeline and Associated Infrastructure Anglogold Ashanti (Pty) Ltd
    REPORT BA and EMPr for the Proposed Surface Pipeline and Associated Infrastructure AngloGold Ashanti (Pty) Ltd Submitted to: Department of Mineral Resources Submitted by: Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd. Building 1, Maxwell Office Park, Magwa Crescent West, Waterfall City, Midrand, 1685, South Africa P.O. Box 6001, Halfway House, 1685 +27 11 254 4800 19121900-328397-9 March 2020 March 2020 19121900-328397-9 Distribution List 1 x copy Department of Mineral Resources 1 x copy AngloGold Ashanti (Pty) Ltd 1 x electronic copy e-projects library [email protected] 1 x electronic copy Golder project folder i March 2020 19121900-328397-9 Table of Contents 1.0 DETAILS OF APPLICANT ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP) ..................................... 1 2.1 Details of the EAP ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Expertise of the EAP ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2.1 Qualifications of the EAP .............................................................................................................. 1 2.2.2 Summary of the EAP’s past experience ....................................................................................... 2 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rand Water 1903-2003
    Rand Water and a new South Africa 1994-1999 Rand Water were also ready to draw up a contract for the board, in which they declared that the signatories were prepared to enter into negotiations with the Lekoa Vaal Metropolitan Authority to develop the necessary infrastructure to make provision for a water reticulation and sanitation service company. Rand Water was to make a contribution of R1,2 million, which was considered to be the value of the investment of 50 per cent in the venture.79 Investing in previously disadvantaged people One of the outstanding features in management planning strategies of Rand Water since the start of the 1990s had been the responsibility to always take note of disadvantaged communities. It was easy to cope with the demand of formerly privileged communities in the middle class suburban townships of Gauteng. A major responsibility, from the government’s side, was to take note of those people who were unable to make headway in the new dispensation. While the existing water supply structures of local authorities were able to cope with the water demands of suburbia, there were indications that support services to previously disadvantaged people in the townships did not make headway. It was against this background that non-government organisations, as well as civic leaders of Alexandra and Soweto, levelled criticism against sophisticated and large-scale water schemes, such as the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. This forced government officials and the private sector to take note of the state of affairs. Although government did not give a direct indication that it intended responding to the demands, there was a gradual shift towards the formulation of a policy that made provision for certain ‘free services’.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Numbered Route Description and Destination Analysis
    NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT RDDA SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS MAY 2012 Prepared by: TITLE SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS ISBN STATUS DOT FILE DATE 2012 UPDATE May 2012 COMMISSIONED BY: National Department of Transport COTO Private Bag x193 Roads Coordinating Body PRETORIA SA Route Numbering and Road Traffic 0001 Signs Committee SOUTH AFRICA CARRIED OUT BY: TTT Africa Author: Mr John Falkner P O Box 1109 Project Director: Dr John Sampson SUNNINGHILL Specialist Support: Mr David Bain 2157 STEERING COMMITTEE: Mr Prasanth Mohan Mr Vishay Hariram Ms Leslie Johnson Mr Schalk Carstens Mr Nkululeko Vezi Mr Garth Elliot Mr Msondezi Futshane Mr Willem Badenhorst Mr Rodney Offord Mr Jaco Cronje Mr Wlodek Gorny Mr Richard Rikhotso Mr Andre Rautenbach Mr Frank Lambert [i] CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... xi 2. TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... xi 3. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT .......................................................................................... xii ROUTE DESCRIPTION – NATIONAL ROUTES NATIONAL ROUTE N1 .............................................................................................................................. 1 NATIONAL ROUTE N2 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]