• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

* What is The Avalon School of Astrology? * Is there anything I need to know about the Avalon lessons? _______________________________________________________________________ _ <1st Week> Class 1What is Astrology? Class 2What's Out There? <2nd Week> Class 3What's Out There? Part 2 Class 4How do Astrologers Interpret this stuff? <3rd Week> Class 5What is a Natal Chart? Class 6Houses <4th Week> Class 7Zodiac Signs on the House Cusps Class 8Practice Determining Sign and House Placements <5th Week> Class 9Aspects Class 10 The Aspect Grid <6th Week> Class 11 The Meanings of Signs, Houses, and Planets Class 12 Interpreting the Birth chart (Introduction) <7th Week> Class 13 Analyzing the Strongest Aspects, Part I Class 14 Analyzing the Strongest Aspects, Part II <8th Week> Class 15 Analyzing the Chart of Another Famous Person Class 16 Outer versus Inner Planets <9th Week> Class 17 The Asc and MC Class 18 The Moon's Nodes <10th Week> Class 19 Other Aspects (Trines, Sextiles, Quincunxes), Part I Class 20 Other Aspects (Trines, Sextiles, Quincunxes), Part II <11th Week> Class 21 Test (today's class is a test only) Class 22 The Rising Sign, Part I <12th Week> Class 23 The Rising Sign, Part II Class 24 Element Balance <13th Week> Class 25 Zodiac Sign Rulerships Class 26 Natural Zodiac Sign of a House <14th Week> Class 27 House Systems Class 28 Analyzing Relationships: The BiWheel <15th Week> Class 29 Analyzing Relationships: Other Factors Class 30 The Composite Chart <16th Week> Class 31 Astrology in Transition: the Draconic Chart and New Insights into the Composite Chart Class 32 The Composite Chart: its relationship to angles between the charts, and comparing it to the Natal Chart <17th Week> Class 33 Forecasting with Transits Class 34 Forecasting with Secondary Progressions <18th Week> Class 35 Another Look at Progressions Class 36 Forecasting with Solar and Lunar Returns <19th Week> Class 37 Scientific Versus Psychological Astrology - article by Glenn Perry Class 38 Modern Techniques: Midpoints <20th Week> Class 39 Harmonics, Part 1: The Navamsa Chart Class 40 Harmonics, Part 2: Aspects are a Fraction of a Circle! <21st Week> Class 41 Harmonics, Part 3: Applying Harmonic Astrology Class 42 Other Techniques: Arabic Parts, Fixed Stars, Asteroids, Parallels of Declination, Degree Meanings, Ancient Methods, and Heliocentric Astrology. <22nd Week> Class 43 Astrology as Symbolic Language or as an Energy Process Class 44 Re-visiting the Basics: Interpretations of the Planets <23rd Week> Class 45 Re-visiting the Basics: Interpretation of the Zodiac Signs Class 46 The Draconic Chart, Gems, and Colors <24th Week> Class 47 Relocation Astrology What is Astrology? Class 1 Today we will: 1. Define what astrology is. 2. Answer the question "Is astrology a science?" WHAT IS ASTROLOGY? Astrology is the study of correlations of celestial events with behavior on earth, particularly correlations which cannot be explained by gravitation, magnetism, or other forces that are well-established in physics or other sciences. A "celestial event" is any event in the sky. For example, the Sun rising is a celestial event, or any two planets appearing in the same place in the sky is a celestial event. The celestial event can involve any celestial body, whether it be the Sun, Moon, a planet, an asteroid, comet, star, black hole, quasar, or other celestial object. The celestial event may also not involve any physical body at all, such as when, for example, the Moon's North Node (as we shall find out later, the Moon's North Node is not a physical object) is on the eastern horizon. The eastern horizon is, of course, simply where the sky meets the horizon of the earth in the easterly direction, and therefore is also not a physical body like a planet or star. Some people mention that the Moon's position affects the tides of the ocean, as an example of an astrological influence, but the correlation of ocean tides with the Moon's position can be explained by gravitation so it is not really astrological in that the rules used by astrologers generally cannot be explained by gravitation or other forces known in the sciences. Astrology has been used by virtually every advanced civilization for thousands of years, but it has almost always been very controversial as well. Today, skepticism about astrology is as strong as ever, and there are many good reasons for this. Astrology has its roots in ancient times when less scientific methods were employed and superstition was rampant in many of these civilizations. The only exposure that many people have had to astrology is the sun sign columns in the newspaper or a glamorous psychic astrologer on television. Thus, it is hardly surprising that astrology is generally not accepted as a legitimate and valid field of inquiry by academia. Resistance to astrology in academia is strong. The Kepler program and other fine work being done in the field of astrology today will hopefully open the eyes of many people to a valuable tool that is being overlooked. Some people confuse astrology with astronomy. Astronomy is the science that studies celestial phenomena physically. All objects in the sky are studied in terms of their constitution, position, history, etc. Astronomy, of course, is a science and no one disputes its validity. Astrology goes a step beyond astronomy by making correlations of celestial phenomena with events on earth, and these correlations are not of a nature that can be easily explained by traditional scientific concepts. Astrology is highly controversial, and currently (as of 1998; this may change in the near future) an accredited college degree is not available in astrology, which exemplifies the fact that astrology is currently not well- received in most academic circles. Note that no one has proven how astrology works. There are many different views on how or why astrology might work, but there is not single conclusive answer that has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of all astrologers. Astrology is the study of the correlation between celestial phenomena and behavior on earth but why should this correlation exist? There are many possible answers and I will not go into those now. Note that the lack of a clear explanation of why the correlation should exist, or the fact that the existence of such a correlation seems absurd to many scientists and non-scientists alike, does not in itself make astrology unscientific. Scientists can analyze correlations and perfect their ability to predict based on these correlations without knowing why the correlation exists. Experts in scientific methodology emphasize that science ultimately is about making observations and theories help us understand the observations. The ability to predict that an apple will fall to the ground if dropped is a scientifically verifiable statement and it does not require the theory of gravitation to make it more scientific. However, the theory of gravitation allows us to understand not only why the apple falls to the ground, but also a myriad other phenomena such as why planets revolve around the Sun and the Moon revolves around the Earth. The power of a scientific theory is that it expands our ability to make predictions about other phenomena, but the lack of good theories does not make a replicable experiment less scientific. IS ASTROLOGY A SCIENCE? Much of astrology sounds like superstition. For example, most astrologers believe that Mars is a planet of aggression and if you were born when Mars was rising, setting, or over your head ("culminating" is the more technical astronomical term for "over your head") when you were born, then you have the characteristics of Mars: aggressive and ambitious. In addition to sounding superstitious, there is no way to explain such an influence. Does this mean that astrology is not a science? The answer to this question is hotly debated. Even some astrologers prefer to look at astrology as a cosmic art rather than a mundane science. Interestingly, the scientific method, contrary to popular opinion and even the opinion of some self-proclaimed scientists, has nothing to do with "common sense". Science is founded on the scientific method, and the scientific method requires only that rigorous procedures be employed to verify that the observed phenomenon is "real", not an artifact of other influences ("extraneous variables" is the term used by scientists). Much of modern physics, in fact, does not make "common sense". The discoveries of Albert Einstein and other 20th century scientists have destroyed the "common sense" science that developed through the 18th and 19th centuries. Modern physics postulates a vast number of concepts which sound absurd to common sense, but they are indisputably scientific because they are congruent with observations made using the rigorous procedure of the scientific method. Therefore, the fact that astrology does not make common sense or cannot be explained by known physical laws does not disqualify it as a science. What would disqualify astrology as a science would be repeated failure to validate any of its precepts in scientific studies. But scientific studies by John Addey, John Nelson, Ann Parker, Theodore Landscheidt, Mark Urban-Lurain, the Gauquelins, and many others have already validated some astrological influences. These studies cannot be officially declared to be scientific proof, however, because a study must first meet the criteria required by the scientific method: peer review and replication of the results are required before being considered to be scientific validation. A study must be published in a recognized scientific journal to ensure that the study has been conducted properly. Also, a well-designed study typically requires huge amounts of time and money to fund. Astrology today is caught in a chicken-and-egg dilemma: Because the funding and support is not available, the studies have not been validated and published in major scientific journals.

Load more

  67

Copy Link