• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Physics With Two Time Dimensions Jacob G. Foster1 and Berndt M¨uller2 1Complexity Science Group, Department of Physics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 2Department of Physics & Center for Theoretical and Mathematical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA (Dated: January 25, 2010) We explore the properties of physical theories in space-times with two time dimensions. We show that the common arguments used to rule such theories out do not apply if the dynamics associated with the additional time dimension is thermal or chaotic and does not permit long-lived time-like excitations. We discuss several possible realizations of such theories, including holographic representations and the possibility that quantum dynamics emerges as a consequence of a second time dimension. I. INTRODUCTION field theory, constructed as the boundary field theory of a six-dimensional Anti-deSitter space-time with two time dimensions containing a Schwarzschild black-hole. Modern unified theories of the fundamental interac- In Sect. IV we point out that, once the notion of field tions generally posit that we live, at microscopic scales, theories in space-times with two time dimensions is ac- in a universe with more than three spatial dimensions. cepted as physically viable, the quantum dynamics of the Following Kaluza's [1] and Klein's [2] original idea, the reduced field theory in Minkowski space can be gener- extraneous dimensions are assumed to be compactified ated by the mechanism of micro-canonical quantization so that excited modes of the elementary particle fields from the underlying classical dynamics of a field in a involving nontrivial dynamics in these dimensions are ex- higher-dimensional space-time that contains two time di- ceedingly massive and therefore not directly observable. mensions. Finally, we summarize our results and present The sole exception to this rule may be gravity [3]. some thoughts about the possible cosmological context The Kaluza-Klein concept is naturally realized within of a second time dimension. superstring theory, which requires at least six additional dimensions for internal consistency [4]. It has been noted in recent years that the additional spatial dimensions do II. MULTIPLE TIME DIMENSIONS not have to be aspects of a genuine space-time contin- uum, but could be artefacts of the algebraic structure of A. The case against multiple time dimensions some underlying quantum mechanical system [5]. One common feature of most theoretical speculations Let us briefly review why the basic principles of causal- of this kind is that the additional dimensions are as- ity, unitarity, and vacuum stability are thought to be vi- sumed to be spatial. The reason for this restriction is olated in the presence of additional time dimensions. that physics in the presence of more than one temporal dimension is generally considered to violate several fun- 1. Causality: In space-times with at least two time di- damental and well established properties of nature. The mensions, it is always possible to construct closed two most important of these principles are causality and time-like curves [6]. This is especially worrisome in unitarity, but there are also concerns that additional time the context of classical physics, where observers are dimensions imply tachyonic modes and ghost fields, i. e. not part of the physical system and can \act" in un- predictable ways. The existence of closed time-like arXiv:1001.2485v2 [hep-th] 25 Jan 2010 field components with negative norm. curves implies that an observer can revisit the past We will discuss the case against more than a single and, if we accept the tenet of \free will", change it time dimension in Sect. II, followed by an overview of in a manner that is incompatible with the already the arguments that have led us to reconsider this case. In experienced future. The classic example of a result- Sect. III, we first review the mathematical difficulties as- ing inconsistency is the trip back in time, where the sociated with the initial-value problem for wave equations hero unwittingly kills his own ancestor (the grand- in spaces with multiple time dimensions. After explain- father paradox). Obviously, anything resembling ing why a recently proposed resolution of the ill-posed na- the common notion of causality cannot be main- ture of the initial-value problem does not work in general tained under such circumstances. The question of for interacting fields, we will argue that interacting fields the well-posed nature of the Cauchy (initial-value) without propagating time-like modes (with respect to the problem in space-times with closed time-like paths additional time dimension) can evade this difficulty. In was investigated in detail by Aref'eva et al. [9]. particular, we show how the difficulty can be circumnavi- gated if the field is thermalized in the additional time di- 2. Unitarity: While violations of causality can arise mension. We propose a specific model of such a quantum both in classical and quantum dynamics, violations 2 of unitarity are specific to the realm of quantum B. Multiple time dimensions reconsidered mechanics. Why unitarity can be violated in the- ories with more than one time dimension is most We shall now explain why these objections against ad- easily illustrated, following Yndur´ain[10], by con- ditional time dimensions may not be as ironclad as gen- sidering the Feynman propagator of a scalar par- erally believed. We begin by noting that the objections ticle in three spatial and two temporal dimensions are based on the assumption that the higher-dimensional denoted by x and (t; θ), respectively. We denote space-time exists in a state resembling the vacuum state, the Fourier transformed variables as (k; !; χ). The so that local excitations are discrete in energy and their potential energy V (r) between by a static source, classical or quantal motion is regular. This need not be located at x = 0 and one at jxj = r and existing at the case for an additional time dimension. For instance, the same \time" θ, has the form (see Appendix for we can imagine that excitations with an (energy-like) details): momentum component in the direction of a second time dimension are thermally excited with a temperature T " 1 # 5 α 2α X that is much higher than any energy scale accessible in V (r) = − 1 + einr=L ; (1) r r the laboratory. The dynamics in the additional time di- n=1 mension would then be diffusive, not ballistic, and would where L is the extent of the additional time dimen- thus render any deliberate attempt to revisit a targeted sion (considered as compact) and α is the effective event in the past futile [12]. low-energy coupling constant. In fact, for the causality argument against a second time dimension to fail, we do not have to assume true As seen from (1), the additional compactified time thermalization. All we need to assume is that the excita- dimension renders the scalar potential generated by tion energy with respect to the second time dimension is a static source imaginary. Yndur´ain'sresult also sufficiently high and the physical system sufficiently non- applies to the Coulomb potential generated by a linear, so that all trajectories involving motion in the sec- static charge; thus, the energy levels of the hydro- ond time dimension are dynamically unstable. Even an gen atom would be complex, implying a violation infinitesimal deviation from the precise initial conditions of the conservation of probability. In other words, a of the closed-time path would then result in exponen- compactified second time dimension leads to viola- tially large deviations of the end-point of the trajectory tions of unitarity in quantum mechanics, seemingly from its starting point. Our fortunate hero would almost excluding extended space-time models of this kind. certainly miss his ancestor, or more correctly, the proba- Dvali et al. [11] considered a slightly different sit- bility for an encounter with him would be exponentially uation, where particles are localized at θ = θ0 in small no matter how hard he tried. the second time dimension, and only gravity prop- A space-time with a thermally excited second time di- agates freely in the additional dimension. mension also allows us to evade the objection based on 3. Tachyons: Quantum field theories in space-time unitarity violation [15]. If we repeat Yndur´ain'scalcu- with more than one time dimension generally suf- lation of the propagator of a scalar particle, but in a fer from the presence of tachyonic modes. In or- thermal bath rather than in the vacuum, we do not en- der to see why, we again consider a scalar field in counter unitarity violations. The periodicity of the sec- Minkowski space augmented by a fifth, temporal ond time dimension is now along the imaginary axis, im- dimension, with the same notation for the coor- plying Matsubara frequencies χn = 2πinT5, and the re- dinates and the conjugate momenta as above. The sulting two-body potential dispersion relation of a free relativistic particle with " 1 # α X mass m then has the form V (x) = − 1 + 2 e−nT5r (3) r n=1 !(k; χ) = k2 − χ2 + m2 ; (2) remains real as discussed in the Appendix. Corrections which implies an imaginary Minkowski space en- to the usual Minkowski space potential −α=r are expo- 2 2 2 ergy ! whenever χ > k + m . Modes in this nentially suppressed when T5 is large. Note that for equi- kinematic regime grow exponentially in the physi- librium quantities the thermal extra time dimension be- cal time coordinate t implying a vacuum instability. haves like an extra spatial dimension with compactifica- tion length L = 1=T5; thus the high temperature limit 4.

Load more

  11

Copy Link