Arxiv:1709.10358V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]

arXiv:1709.10358v1 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Sep 2017 ro ftm) ytedrcino h nvreexpan- universe the of direction the by thermodynamic time), by (the of – thermodynamics arrow models of theoretical law time of of Second numbers asymmetry the large The by space. explained in is analogue no has which problems solved. these been multi- present, light not the at have of of and, speed contradictoriness theory can time to the particle dimensional leads than A This faster vacuum. region [6]. in causal possible the are in dimensions move opposite time backwards the movement the the in In causal and the space-time of the of violation [5]. base structure the the algebra time, multidimensional on geometric of provided case Clifford with be 1)-space-time the + can of (3 time [4]. the our- one-dimensional space-time of find the 1)-dimensional description + should natural but (3 we The all a and ”dead that inhabiting observers, to notes selves of correspond it might devoid time, one worlds”, same 1)-dimensional infor- + the (3 hidden At the the formula- supplies unified [1–3]. naturally more cap- mation that a not physics of of does existence tion symme- physics the hidden time implying new one ture, give conventional prob- dimensions that theoretical time tries contains Extra time, same lems. the at and, sights of challenges difficult and exciting most imbalance the physics. matter-antimatter of the ones the of are and violation principle, the dimensions, parity time multiple in physics ∗ lcrncades l˙[email protected] address: Electronic h ro ftm steoewypoet ftime of property one-way the is time of arrow The in- new to leads dimensions time multiple in Physics of possibility the time, of arrow the of origin The ler fdsrbtoso unu-eddniisadspa and densities quantum-field of distributions of Algebra este n oeiiaetoedniis hc antbe proper manifold space-time cannot algebratime commutative on which the and when densities, densities case, those on imposed eliminate restrictions to and densities ASnmes 36.b 53.d 11.10.Wx expla 05.30.-d, can 03.65.Db, violation numbers: PACS symmetry This conjugat observed. ca charge the be fields sector can Higgs spinor states res the of of in the densities bosons sector for the that fermion on found the multiplication In the define time. of arrow one-dimensional eddniis nodrt eemn h algebra the determine to order In densities. field h algebra the ht codn oteshm hoy h manifold the theory, scheme the to according that, itiuin fdniiswt iglrte nteclose the in isomorphism singularities local with densities of distributions oePyia-ehia nttt,RsinAaeyo Scie of Academy Russian Institute, Physical-Technical Ioffe nti ae ecnie rpriso h pc-iemanif space-time the of properties consider we paper this In .INTRODUCTION I. A , M M M ihtesrcuegroup structure the with = ∼ = ∼ Spec( Spec( A ,where ), A ,teqatmfilseitol ntesaetm aiodwi manifold space-time the in only exist fields quantum the ), A Dtd uy1,2021) 16, July (Dated: A xss stecs,we h unu ed r ntespace- the in are fields quantum the when case, the is exists, endLutsev Leonid stecmuaieagbao itiuin fquantum- of distributions of algebra commutative the is SO (3 , )(oet ru) h algebra The group). (Lorentz 1) hr sntastsatr xlnto ftearwof solved. arrow being the from far of is explanation problem satisfactory this present, and a At time (fu- not [7–13]. unknown is continuous arrow) the there a time to psychological of (past) (the perception known ture) the the by from and movement uncer- time), quantum of quantum (the the source states quantum by of entanglement arrow), and tainty cosmological (the sion oepantemte-niatriblnei e nthe on set is hope imbalance CP the matter-antimatter present, the At explain universe. to the observed of the asymmetry for account baryon to insufficient is Model Standard h ceeter hs rprisaedtrie by determined of are framework algebra properties the commutative these the in the of theory that scheme violation find the the and violation), conjugation, chirality dimen- charge time the multiple and time, of sions, arrow (the properties time ovdpolm.Teaon of amount un- The the The of one problems. [14–16]. as solved right- observed remains and imbalance be particles matter-antimatter could left-handed sym- anti-particles only chiral handed the – as vi- breaking exhibits The reflection metry systems. space chiral the of of olation properties the characterize to r itiuin.Teeaemn etitost con- to restrictions many are consequently, There and, fields distributions. auxiliary are of are densities functionals Quantum-field linear [24–27]. equa- the functionals by on with determined tions contrast are fields In quantum is physics, functions. algebra classical of commutative ring the the commutative physics, In the classical asso- algebra. the commutative is a of space of case The spectrum [23]. a space the with of to ciated concept led This the of [22]. solve evolution geometry to algebraic needed Grothendieck of formalism problems the Alexander deep developing of by aim the with introduced were Schemes pc-ieadtecag conjugation charge the and space-time A M uuelgtcn ust nacuto the of account On subset. cone light future d ti eesr odfiemlilcto on multiplication define to necessary is it , h iceesmer ftesaereflection space the of symmetry discrete The nti ae ecnie h bv-etoe space- above-mentioned the consider we paper this In ilto nteHgssco [17–21]. sector Higgs the in violation ∗ slclyioopi otesetu of spectrum the to isomorphic locally is is ti on htteol possible only the that found is It ties. o ymtyvoaino h densities the on violation symmetry ion cs 901 t eesug Russia Petersburg, St. 194021, nces, xli h hrlt ilto.I is It violation. chirality the explain n ntemte-niatrimbalance. matter-antimatter the in rcin asdb h osblt to possibility the by caused trictions utpid hslast essential to leads This multiplied. old M asdb h proposition the by caused etm properties ce-time A fqatmfil densities. quantum-field of A osssof consists CP hthe th ilto nthe in violation C a eused be may P fthe of 2

struct the commutative algebra of distributions. In the ζ1...ζn ζ1 + ... W (x1 ...xn)Q (x1) common case, multiplication on distributions cannot be Z Z n>X1 ζ1X...ζn defined and depends on their wavefront sets. In microlocal analysis the wavefront set WF(u) characterizes the ζn singularities of a distribution u, not only in space, but ...Q (xn) dx1 . . . dxn, also with respect to its Fourier transform at each point. The term wavefront was coined by Lars Hörmander [28]. where Qζ (x) is the auxiliary fields. For this purpose, we It needs to note that the microlocal analysis has resulted derive differential equations for the densities of quantum in the recent progress in the renormalized quantum field fields from the Schwinger equation. Let us consider fields theory in curved space-time [29–32]. In our case, the pos- Ψ on the space-time manifold M sibility to define multiplication on distributions leads to essential restrictions imposed on densities forming the al- ζ α ¯α n +n a gebra A. The spectrum of the algebra A is locally isomor- Ψ(x)= {Ψ (x)} = {ψ (x), ψ (x), ϕ (x), ϕ (x), Aµ(x)}, phic to the space-time manifold M, M =∼ Spec(A), and (1) α ¯α characterizes its properties such as the one-dimensional where ψ (x), ψ (x) are the fermion (spinor) fields, ϕn(x), ϕ+n(x) are the bosons (for example, Higgs arrow of time, the chirality violation and the structure a group of the space-time manifold M. One can say that bosons), and Aµ(x) are the gauge field potentials. In the space-time is determined by matter. relation (1) and in the all following relations Greek letter indices α and β enumerate types of fermions, µ, ν and The paper is organized as follows. In Section II we ρ are indices of the space-time variables, Latin letters n, derive differential equations for the densities of quan- m, l enumerate types of bosons, and a, b, c are the gauge tum fields from the Schwinger equation and find that, indices, respectively. ζ = {α,n,a} is the multiindex. in the common case, the quantum field densities are Since wavefronts of distributions can be localized [33] distributions. The quantum fields contain fermion, bo- and a differential manifold locally resembles Euclidian son (Higgs), and gauge field components. Multiplica- space near each point, we consider the case when the tion on the quantum-field densities and the commuta- space-time manifold M is the 4-dimensional Euclidian tive algebra A of distributions of densities are consid- (pseudo-Euclidian) space or an open subset of this space ered in Section III. It is found that the only possible with the Euclidian metric tensor gµν . In order to derive case, when the commutative algebra A of distributions quantum-field equations, we consider the action of the of quantum-field densities exists, is the case, when the fields Ψ on the manifold M [14, 15, 34] quantum fields are in the space-time manifold M with the structure group SO(3, 1) (Lorentz group) and the time is one-dimensional. The asymmetry of time, the S(Ψ) = L(Ψ(x)) dx chirality violation of spinor fields, and the charge con- ZM jugation symmetry violation in the boson sector are the necessary conditions for the existence of the algebra A. with the Lagrangian The quantum fields exist only in the space-time manifold with the one-dimensional arrow of time and with chiral- 1 ity and charge conjugation symmetry violations. Ideals, L(Ψ(x)) = − F a (x)F µνa(x)+ iψ¯α(x)γµ∇α ψβ(x) 4 µν µβ localization, the spectrum of the density distribution algebra A and the scheme (M, AM) are considered in Sec- ¯ l +n µl m tion IV. If the algebra A can be determined and is the +∇µnϕ (x)∇m ϕ (x) component of the scheme, then the space-time manifold M with quantum fields exists. Otherwise, the space-time α ¯α n +n manifold is devoid of matter and, consequently, does not − m(ψ (x), ψ (x), ϕ (x), ϕ (x)), (2) exist. where

a a a a b c II. QUANTUM-FIELD EQUATIONS Fµν = ∂µAν − ∂ν Aµ + ej(a)CbcAµAν ,

Quantum ﬁelds are determined by equations on func- aµν µρ νσ a tionals. In this section we consider singularities of the F = g g Fρσ, linear components W ζ (x) (densities) of the functional solution are the intensity of the gauge ﬁelds,

γµγν + γν γµ =2gµν G(Q)= W ζ (x)Qζ (x) dx Z Xζ are Dirac matrices, 3

α α α a i ∇µβ = ∂µδβ − iej(a)TaβAµ, G(Q)= exp (S(Ψ) + (Q, Ψ)) DΨ. Z ~

We consider densities of the quantum ﬁelds ψα(x), ψ¯α(x), ∇l = ∂ δl − ie τ l Aa , ∇µl = gµν ∇l , n +n a µm µ m j(a) am µ m νm ϕ (x), ϕ (x), and Aµ(x)

~ ¯ l l ∗l a ζ δG(Q) ∇µm = ∂µδm + iej(a)τamAµ, W (x)= ζ . δQ (x) Q→0 T = kT α k is the gauge matrix with the commuta- a aβ c Taking into account the form of the Lagrangian (2), tion relation [Ta,Tb] = iCabTc acting on spinors as ′ a a ψ = exp(iσ Ta)ψ, σ is an arbitrary real number. τa = from the Schwinger equation (3) we can obtain differ- m ζ kτank is the gauge matrix with the commutation relation ential equations for the densities W (x) = {W (x)} = c ′ a α α n n a {W (x), W (x), W (x), W + (x), W (x)}, which [τa, τb] = iCabτc acting on bosons as ϕ = exp(iσ τa)ϕ. (ψ) (ψ¯) (ϕ) (ϕ ) (A)µ It is supposed that the summation in relation (2) and in can be written in the form the all following relations is performed over all repeat- ing indices. e is the charge corresponding to the j j(a) (α) factor of the direct decomposition of the gauge group α µ←− m c α (s) W(ψ¯)(x) γ ∂ µ − ~ = B(ψ¯)(R (x)) G = j Gj (= SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)). If the index a of operatorsQ Ta and τa belongs to the subgroup Gj , then in the charge ej(a) j(a)= j. In the Lagrangian (2) α ¯α n +n m(α)c the polynomial m(ψ , ψ , ϕ , ϕ ) does not contain field γµ∂~ + W α (x)= Bα (R(s)(x)) derivatives. The polynomial m determines mass terms µ ~ (ψ) (ψ) and interactions between fields. For derivation of the quantum-field Schwinger equation it needs to add the linear term m(n)2c2 − W n (x)= Bn (R(s)(x)) (Q, Ψ) with auxiliary fields Q(x) = {Qζ(x)} = ~2 (ϕ) (ϕ) α α n n a {Q(ψ)(x),Q(ψ¯)(x),Q(ϕ)(x),Q(ϕ+)(x),Q(A)µ(x)} to the action S(Ψ) (n)2 2 m c n n (s) − W + (x)= B + (R (x)) ~2 (ϕ ) (ϕ ) S¯(Ψ,Q)= S(Ψ) + (Q, Ψ), where a a (s) W(A)µ(x)= B(A)µ(R (x)), (4) where α α α ¯α n n (Q, Ψ) = (Q(ψ)(x)ψ (x)+Q(ψ¯)(x)ψ (x)+Q(ϕ)(x)ϕ (x) ZM ∂2(·) (·)= gµν n +n a a ∂xµxν +Q(ϕ+)(x)ϕ (x)+ Q(A)µ(x)Aµ(x)) dx. (α) (n) n +n a is the d’Alembert operator; m and m are For fields ϕ (x), ϕ (x), and Aµ(x) the auxiliary fields ζ α α masses of fermions and bosons, respectively; Q (x) are simple variables and for fields ψ (x) and ψ¯ (x) ζ α α n n a B = {B ,B ,B ,B + ,B } are polynomials the auxiliary fields are Grassmanian ones, respectively. (ψ) (ψ¯) (ϕ) (ϕ ) (A)µ of higher order Green’s functions Then, the Schwinger equation is written in the form [24, 25]

~s ~ (s) δ G(Q) δS(Ψ) ζ R (x)= ζ η , (s> 1).  + Q (x) G(Q)=0, (3) δQ (x) ...δQ (x) δΨζ (x)  Ψζ (x)=κ~~δ/δiQζ (x)  s Q→0

  | {z } where ~δ/δΨ is the functional derivative on the left, κ =1 Equations (4) can be written in the form for bosons and κ = −1 for fermions, G(Q) is the generating functional. The formal solution of the Schwinger η ζ η (s) equation (3) is the functional integral Nζ W (x)= B (R (x)), (5) 4

η k η q ∗ where Nζ = q=0 aqζ ∂x is the matrix differential opera- The covector ξ ∈ T (x) lies in the cotangent cone Γx at tor. SolutionsP of the Schwinger equation (3) determined the point x. Taking into account equations (4), we can the generating functional G(Q) and solutions of equa- find that tions (4), (5) can be found in the approximate form by the diagram technique [25–27]. We will not find solu- η µν tions of the Schwinger equation. Our aim is to analyse Char(Nζ ) = g ξµξν , x singularities of solutions. For our purposes it is sufficient to note that, in the common case, solutions of equations consequently, singularities of solutions are located on this (4) and (5) are distributions. The question is: which dis- cone and partially can be formed by wavefronts of higher tributions of the densities W ζ (x) can be multiplied and, order Green’s functions R(s). therefore, form a commutative algebra? We suppose that Starting from the proposition that properties of the ζ the densities W (x) can be expressed in the oscillatory– space-time manifold M are defined by the quantum fields integral form [33, 35, 36] Ψζ(x) and, consequently, by the commutative algebra A of distributions W ζ (x), in the next section we find that this statement results in essential restrictions imposed on W ζ (x)= F ζ (x, χ) exp [iσζ (x, χ)] dχ, (6) the space-time manifold M. ZT ∗M where T ∗M is the cotangent bundle over the space-time manifold M, σζ (x, χ) is the phase function, F ζ (x, χ) is III. ALGEBRA OF DISTRIBUTIONS OF the amplitude, χ is the covector, and (x, χ) ∈ T ∗M. It QUANTUM-FIELD DENSITIES needs to note that relation (6) defines Lagrangian distributions, which form the subset of the space of all distri- In order to determine points of the space-time mani- butions D′(M). Any Lagrangian distribution can be rep- fold M by means of the densities W ζ (x), it is necessary to resented locally by oscillatory integrals [36]. Conversely, define multiplication on densities, to construct the com- any oscillatory integral is a Lagrangian distribution. We mutative algebra A of distributions of densities, and to consider the case of the real linear phase function of χ find maximal ideals of this algebra. According to Ref. [33, 35], multiplication on distributions u, v ∈ D′(M) with wavefronts WF(u)= {(x, ξ)} and WF(v)= {(x, η)} ζ ζ σ (x, χ)= k χν xν , (7) is determined, if and only if where kζ is a coefficient. Our consideration of the case of Lagrangian distributions is motivated by the statement WF(u) WF′(v)= ∅, (8) that, if the multiplication cannot be defined on the La- \ grangian distribution subset, then this operation cannot ′ be defined on the space D′(M). where WF (v) is the image of WF(v) in the transformation (x, η) 7→ (x, −η) in the cone subset Γ of the cotan- The wavefront set WF(u) of a distribution u can be ∗ defined as [28, 33, 35] gent bundle T M. The wavefront of the product is defined as

∗ WF(u)= {(x, ξ) ∈ T M| ξ ∈ Γx(u)}, WF(uv) ⊂{(x, ξ + η)| (x, ξ) ∈ WF(u) where the singular cone Γx(u) is the complement of all di- rections ξ such that the Fourier transform of u, localized at x, is sufficiently regular when restricted to a conical or ξ =0, (x, η) ∈ WF(v) or η = 0; ξ + η 6=0} . (9) neighborhood of ξ. The wavefront of the distributions WF(W ζ ) characterizes the singularities of solutions and Taking into account the linear form of the phase func- is determined by the wavefront of R(s)(x) and by the tion (7), from relations (8) and (9) we obtain restrictions η on the densities W ζ (x). For this purpose, we consider characteristics of the matrix operator Nζ [33, 35] wavefronts of densities for the cases of the space-time manifold M, when the structure group of the cotangent ζ η η (s) ∗ WF(W ) ⊂ Char(Nζ ) WF(B (R )), bundle T M is the Lie group SO(4 − p,p) with p = 0, [ p = 1, and p> 1. η where the characteristics Char(Nζ ) is the set {(x, ξ) ∈ The fields Ψ (1) are observed relative to inertial frames T ∗M\0} defined by linear algebraic equations of highest of reference in the space-time manifold M. Rectilinear power orders in the unknown Fourier transforms W˜ ζ (ξ) motion transforms the fields Ψ and, consequently, their densities W ζ (x) and wavefronts. This transformation can be considered as a diffeomorphism of M and is described aη (−iξ)qW˜ ζ (ξ)=0. by the arcwise connected part of the SO(4 − p,p) group. qζ ′ ζ,q=maxX k More precisely, if f : Ω → Ω is the diffeomorphism of 5

′ ∗ ∗ ′ open subsets Ω, Ω ⊂M, f+ : T Ω → T Ω is the diﬀeo- r SO(4,0) ′ ′ ′ (a) 1 morphism induced by f, and f∗ : D (Ω) → D (Ω ) is the isomorphism, then for the distribution u ∈ D′(Ω) [33, 35]

WF(f∗u)= f+ WF(u). (10)

r2 Thus, rectilinear motion results in the transformation f∗ of the ﬁeld densities W ζ (x) induced by the arcwise connected part of the structure group and the transformation f+ of density wavefronts (10). If, as a result of these transformations, the covector ξ ∈ WF(W ζ ) ⊂ T ∗M changes its orientation ξ 7→ −ξ, then the multiplication (b) t SO(3,1) ζ G(f) (9) on the density W1 (x) with the covector ξ and the ζ density W2 (x) with the covector −ξ is impossible. We consider transformations of density wavefronts induced G(s) by the arcwise connected part of the structure group (10) and by discrete symmetry transformations – the time re- r versal and the space reﬂection.

light G(p) A. Time reversal cone

SO(2,2) We assume that the co-ordinate variables of the space- (c) t1 time manifold M can be divided by time t and space r variables, x = {t1,...,tp, r1,...} (p =0, 1, 2,...). The structure group of the space-time manifold is SO(4−p,p). We consider the time reversal T on the manifold M and the possibility of embedding of the time reversal into the t 2 arcwise connected part of the group SO(4 − p,p).

Euclidian space-time manifold with the structure group SO(4, 0). Let us consider the case of the time reversal on the Euclidian space-time manifold M with the ∗ structure group SO(4, 0) of the cotangent bundle T M. FIG. 1: Transformation of the covector ξ 7→ −ξ at the time re- The signature of the space-time metric is (−−−−). In versal of the space-time manifold M with the structure groups this case, p = 0 and the time variable t is identical to the (a) SO(4, 0), (b) SO(3, 1), and (c) SO(2, 2). The image of the space one (for example, r1). The image of the inversion transformation ξ 7→ −ξ can be reached by means of a trans- ξ 7→ −ξ in relation (10) on wavefronts of densities can formation of the arcwise connected part of groups SO(4, 0) be reached by the transformation induced by the arcwise and SO(2, 2) and is not attainable for the case of the arcwise connected part of the group SO(4, 0) (Fig. 1a). Thus, connected part of the SO(3, 1) group. we always can find densities with covectors ξ and η in relation (9) such that ξ + η = 0. Consequently, multiplication on distributions in the Euclidian space-time mani- is impossible because of the existence of the inversion fold with the signature of the space-time metric (−−−−) ξ 7→ −ξ reached by the arcwise connected part of the is impossible. One can only say about a partial multi- group SO(3, 1). Therefore, singularities can exist only in plication operation on a subset of the distribution space. the cone Γ(f) or in the cone Γ(p). The time reversal T in- ∗ The analogous consideration can be carried out for man- verts the covector ξ ∈ WF(W ζ ) ⊂ T M from the future ifold M with the structure group SO(0, 4) and with the light cone Γ(f) to the past light cone Γ(p) (Fig. 1b). The signature of the space-time metric (++++). Lorentz transformation SO(3, 1) acts on future and past light cones separately. Consequently, the arcwise con- Pseudo-Euclidian space-time manifold with the nected part of the group SO(3, 1) does not contain the structure group SO(3, 1). The signature of the space- time inversion. So, if we exclude field density distribu- time metric is (+−−−). In accordance with relation tions W ζ (x) with singularities in the past light cone Γ(p) µν g ξµξν = 0 defined boundaries of a singular cone, the and consider only density distributions with singularities space-time manifold is separated by three regions: the in the future light cone Γ(f), then for these distributions future light cone Γ(f), the past light cone Γ(p), and the multiplication can be defined. Correspondingly, den- the space-like region Γ(s) (Fig. 1b). The multiplica- sities of states T Ψζ(x) are forbidden. In this case, we tion of distributions with singularities in the region Γ(s) have the one-way direction of time and there is not the 6 symmetry of time on density distributions. The arrow The space reflection P converts the right-handed spinor of time is pointing towards the future. According to (9), into the left-handed one, and vice versa the wavefront of the product of quantum-field densities in the future light cone Γ(f) is given by α α P ψR(x)= iLpψL(x)

n n ζ1 ζn ζi ζi (f) ζi α α WF(W ·...·W ) ⊂{(x, ξ )| ξ ∈ Γ , ξ 6=0}, P ψL(x)= iLpψR(x), Xi Xi where in the Weyl (chiral) basis where ξζi = βζi χ(i) is the covector associated with the density W ζi , βζ is a function of field invariants, such as 0 I chirality, charge signs, charge parity, etc. Taking into ac- L = α p I 0 count that for the Dirac adjoint spinor density W(ψ¯)(x) n and for the density W(ϕ+)(x) the exponent term in the α α and I is the identity 2-matrix. ψR(x) and ψL(x) are integral in relation (6) is transformed as iσζ (x, χ) → eigenvectors of the operator γ5 with the chirality λ = 1 −iσζ (x, χ), we find that in the cone Γ(f) (the right-handed state) and the chirality λ = −1 (the left-handed state), respectively. Double space reflection P 2 can be regarded as 360◦ rotation. It transforms β(ψ) > 0 β(ψ¯) < 0 spinors as

β(ϕ) > 0 β(ϕ+) < 0. (11) 2 α α P ψρ (x)= −ψρ (x), where ρ = {R,L}. Pseudo-Euclidian space-time manifold with the For fulfilment of relations (11) the coefficients β and structure group SO(4 − p,p) (p > 1). The signa- (ψ) β(ψ¯) must contain a charge factor κc such that β(ψ)=1 tures of the space-time metric are (++−−) (p = 2) and ¯ (+++−) (p = 3). If the time dimension is equal to 2 and β(ψ)= −1. We consider two cases, (1) β = λκc with or higher (p > 1), then the image of the time inversion the chirality λ and (2) β = κc without chirality. In order to fulfil multiplication on densities W α (x), W α (x), of densities in the time plane (t1,...,tp) is attained by (ψR) (ψL) W α (x), W α (x) in the first case, for right-handed means of a transformation of the arcwise connected part (ψ¯R) (ψ¯L) of the group SO(4 − p,p) (Fig. 1c). In this case, one can and left-handed states of the fermion fields we should get find densities with covectors ξ and η in relation (9) such that ξ + η = 0. Multiplication on distributions in this α α space-time manifold is impossible. κc(ψR(x)) =1, κc(ψL(x)) = −1,

¯α ¯α B. Space reﬂection and charge conjugation in the κc(ψR(x)) = −1, κc(ψL(x))=1, fermion sector

α α Another restriction to define multiplication on the den- λ(ψR(x)) =1, λ(ψL(x)) = −1, sity distribution algebra is caused by the chirality of fermions and by the charge conjugation. Since, according ¯α ¯α to the above-mentioned subsection the pseudo-Euclidian λ(ψR(x)) =1, λ(ψL(x)) = −1. space-time manifold with the Lorentz group SO(3, 1) and α The charge conjugation C transforms κc: Cκc(ψR(x)) = the arrow of time are necessary conditions for definition ¯α ¯α α κc(ψR(x)) = −1, Cκc(ψR(x)) = κc(ψR(x)) = 1, of multiplication on density distributions, we consider α ¯α ¯α Cκc(ψL(x)) = κc(ψL(x)) = 1, and Cκc(ψL(x)) = fermion distributions with singularities in the future light α (f) κc(ψL(x)) = −1. The commutative algebra A of dis- cone Γ . Right-handed and left-handed states of the ζ α α ¯α tributions contains densities W (x) of states ψR(x), Dirac fields ψ (x) and ψ (x) are defined by projective α ¯α ¯α α α ¯α 5 ψL(x), ψR(x), ψL(x), CP ψR(x), CP ψL(x), CP ψR(x), operators (1 ± γ )/2 acting on a spinor [14, 15, 37] ¯α ζ CP ψL(x), their sums and products. Densities W (x) α α ¯α ¯α α of states P ψR(x), P ψL(x), P ψR(x), P ψL(x), CψR(x), 1+ γ5 Cψα(x), Cψ¯α (x), Cψ¯α(x) are forbidden and are not con- ψα (x)= ψα(x) L R L R 2 tained in the algebra A. This version of the theoretical model can explain the chirality violation. In the second case, the fulfilment of the relation β = κc 5 α α ¯α 1 − γ with κc(ψR(x)) = κc(ψL(x)) = 1 and κc(ψR(x)) = ψα(x)= ψα(x). ¯α ζ L 2 κc(ψL(x)) = −1 results in forbidden densities W (x) of 7

α α ¯α ¯α states CψR(x), CψL(x), CψR(x), and CψL(x). Wave- bra A isomorphic to the space-time manifold M, it needs fronts of these densities are in the past light cone to carry out localization and to determine the sheaf of Γ(p): WF(W α ), WF(W α ), WF(W α ), and structure algebras and the spectrum of the algebra A. (CψR) (CψL) (Cψ¯R) WF(W α ) ∈ Γ(p). At the same time, the commuta- To this end, we deﬁne prime and maximal ideals of this (Cψ¯L) ζ algebra. The algebra A consists of density distributions tive algebra A of distributions contains densities W (x) W ζ (x) with singularities in the closed future light cone α α ¯α ¯α α α ∗ of states ψR(x), ψL(x), ψR(x), ψL(x), P ψR(x), P ψL(x), subset, WF(W ζ ) ⊂ Γ(f) ⊂ T M. The complement of ¯α ¯α P ψR(x), and P ψL(x). The chirality is not violated. In the future light cone subset Γ(f) is the open cone subset the experiment the chirality violation of fermions is ob- Γ¯(f). In the cone subset Γ¯(f) the densities W ζ (x) are served and, therefore, this case of the theoretical model C∞-smooth functions. We deﬁne the maximal ideal at must be ignored. the point x0 as the set of distributions equal to zero at (f) the point x0 in the cone subset Γ¯

C. Charge conjugation in the boson sector ζ ζ ¯(f) mx0 = {W (x)| lim W (x) = 0 in Γ }. x→x0 We consider the common case of the boson (Higgs) n +n sector containing the quantum fields ϕ (x) and ϕ (x). p is called a prime ideal if for all distributions W1(x) and n +n We assume that ϕ (x) 6= ϕ (x). By analogy with W2(x) ∈ A with W1(x)W2(x) ∈ p we have W1(x) ∈ p or the fermion case, the covector of singularity of the den- W2(x) ∈ p [45, 46]. Every maximal ideal mx is prime. n sity of ϕ (x) is β(ϕ)χ and the analogous covector of the In the process of localization of the algebra A we find +n density of ϕ (x) is −β(ϕ+)χ, respectively. In order a local algebra contained only information about the be- ζ to fulfil relations (11) and the requirement that β(ϕ)χ, havior of density distributions W (x) near the point x (f) of the space-time manifold M. We consider the case of −β(ϕ+)χ ∈ Γ , we must write the coefficient β in the n +n maximal ideals. Then, the local algebra Ax is defined as form β = κ (ϕ (x)) and β + = κ (ϕ (x)). The (ϕ) c (ϕ ) c the commutative algebra consisting of fractions of density charge conjugation C changes the sign of the factor κc: n +n +n distributions W1(x) and W2(x) Cκc(ϕ (x)) = κc(ϕ (x)) = −1 and Cκc(ϕ (x)) = n n +n κc(ϕ (x)) = 1. Thus, densities of ϕ (x) and ϕ (x) can be multiplied and are included in the algebra A. On the W1(x) n Ax = W1(x), W2(x) ∈ A, W2(x) ∈/ mx , contrary, wavefronts of densities of states Cϕ (x) and W2(x) +n (p) Cϕ (x) are in the past light cone Γ and must be ex- (12) cluded. This leads to the charge conjugation symmetry where mx is the maximal ideal at the point x. The frac- violation in the boson sector. tion W1(x)/W2(x) is the equivalence class defined as It needs to note that in the modified theoretical models of the Higgs boson sector [17–21, 41–44] extending ′ the BEH model [38–40] some particles in the Higgs sec- W1(x) W1(x) = ′ , tor have negative charge parities and are charged. In W2(x) W2(x) this case, the above-mentioned C-violation on density if there exists the distribution V (x) ∈ A, V (x) ∈/ m distributions in the Higgs sector can explain the observed x such that matter-antimatter imbalance. Thus, as a result of this section, we define the multiplication on distributions of the quantum-field densi- ′ ′ V (x)(W1(x)W2(x) − W2(x)W1(x))=0. ties and construct the commutative density distribution algebra A. The algebra A are generated by distribu- Operations on the local algebra Ax (12) look identical to tions with singularities in the future light cone Γ(f). The those of elementary algebra asymmetry of time (T -violation), the chiral asymmetry (P -violation) and the charge (C) conjugation symmetry ′ ′ ′ W1(x) W1(x) W1(x)W2(x)+ W1(x)W2(x) violation are caused by singularities of density distribu- + ′ = ′ tions and these space-time manifold properties are local. W2(x) W2(x) W2(x)W2(x) Spectrum of the density distribution algebra A and the and scheme (M, AM) are considered in the next section.

′ ′ W1(x) W1(x) W1(x)W1(x) · ′ = ′ . IV. IDEALS AND SPECTRUM OF THE W2(x) W2(x) W2(x)W2(x) DENSITY DISTRIBUTION ALGEBRA. SCHEME (M, AM) Algebras AUi on open sets Ui ⊂M

M For deﬁnition of the scheme (M, A ) contained the AUi = Ax spectrum of the commutative density distribution alge- x\∈Ui 8

determine the structure sheaf [47] AM = {AUi } on the tions of quantum-field densities, ideals and its spectrum, space-time manifold M. The inverse limit of the struc- it is necessary to define multiplication on densities and ture sheaf AM coincides with the algebra A to eliminate those densities, which cannot be multiplied. This leads to essential restrictions imposed on densities forming the algebra A. Taking into account that in the A =←−−−− lim AUi , framework of the scheme theory the space-time manifold Ui∈M M is locally isomorphic to the spectrum of the algebra A, M ∼ Spec(A), the restrictions caused by the possibil- where {U } is the open covering of M. = i ity to define multiplication on the density distributions The spectrum of the algebra A, denoted by Spec(A), is result in the following properties of the space-time man- the set of all prime ideals of A, equipped with the Zariski ifold M. topology [22, 47, 48]. The prime ideals correspond to irreducible subvarieties of the space Spec(A). Maximal (1) The only possible case, when the commutative alge- ideals of the algebra A correspond to points. bra A of distributions of quantum-field densities exist, The structure sheaf and the spectrum of the algebra A is the case, when the quantum fields are in the space- are used in definition of schemes [22, 47, 48]. In our case, time manifold M with the structure group SO(3, 1) the scheme over the algebra A is the pair (M, AM) such (Lorentz group). On account of the local isomorphism that there exists an open covering {Ui} of M for which M =∼ Spec(A), the quantum fields exist only in the space- each pair (Ui, AUi ) is isomorphic to (Vi, OVi ), where {Vi} time manifold with the one-dimensional time. is the open covering of Spec(A) and OVi is the restriction (2) We must exclude field density distributions with sin- (p) of the structure sheaf OSpec(A) to each Vi. As a result, gularities in the past light cone Γ . The algebra A con- one can say that the local isomorphism M =∼ Spec(A) sists of the density distributions W ζ (x) with wavefronts imposed by the theory of schemes and by restrictions on in the closed future light cone subset, WF(W ζ (x)) ⊂ multiplication on the quantum-field-density distributions Γ(f) ⊂ T ∗M. In this case, we have the one-way direc- in the algebra A lead to the dependence of the space-time tion of time and there is not the symmetry of time on properties on the matter. The arrow of time, the chiral- the density distributions. The arrow of time is pointing ity violation of spinor fields, and the charge conjugation towards the future. symmetry violation in the boson sector are consequences of this dependence. (3) The restrictions caused by multiplication on the density distributions can explain the chirality violation of spinor fields. The densities of right-handed and α α ¯α V. CONCLUSION left-handed fermion states P ψR(x), P ψL(x), P ψR(x), ¯α α α ¯α ¯α P ψL(x), CψR(x), CψL(x), CψR(x), CψL(x), where P is the space reflection and C is the charge conjugation, In summary, in this paper we describe the dependence are forbidden and are not contained in the algebra A. between quantum fields and space-time properties in the framework of the scheme theory. Contrary to algebras of (4) For bosons (for example, in the Higgs sector) the den- smooth functions, densities of quantum fields, which can sities of states Cϕn(x) and Cϕ+n(x) must be excluded be found from the Schwinger equation, are distributions from the algebra A. This leads to the charge conjuga- and, in the common case, do not form an algebra. In or- tion symmetry violation and can explain the observed der to determine the commutative algebra A of distribu- matter-antimatter imbalance.

[1] Bars I., ”Two-time physics in ﬁeld theory”, Phys. Rev. [7] Lebowitz J.L., ”Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow”, D 62, 046007 (2000). Physics Today 46, 32-38 (1993). [2] Bars I., ”Standard model of particles and forces in the [8] Kiefer C. and Zeh H.D., ”Arrow of time in a recollapsing framework of two-time physics”, Phys. Rev. D 74, 085019 quantum universe”, Physical Review D 51, 4145-4153 (2006). (1995). [3] Bars I., Terning J., and Nekoogar F. (Founding editor), [9] Zeh H.D., The Physical Basis of The Direction of Extra Dimensions in Space and Time (Springer: New Time (The Frontiers Collection), 5th Edition (Springer: York, 2010). Berlin, 2010). [4] Tegmark M., ”On the dimensionality of spacetime”, [10] Jennings D. and Rudolph T., ”Entanglement and the Class. Quantum Grav. 14, L69-L75 (1997). thermodynamic arrow of time”, Phys. Rev. E 81, 061130 [5] Chappell J.M., Hartnett J.G., Iannella N., Iqbal A., and (2010). Abbott D., ”Time As a Geometric Property of Space”, [11] Mersini-Houghton L. and Vaas R. (eds.), The Arrows of Frontiers in Physics 4, Article 44, 1-6 (2006). DOI: Time. A Debate in Cosmology (Springer: Berlin, 2012). 10.3389/fphy.2016.00044 [12] Bousso R., ”Vacuum structure and the arrow of time”, [6] Velev M.V., ”Relativistic mechanics in multiple time di- Phys. Rev. D 86, 123509 (2012). mensions”, Physics Essays 25, 3, 403-438 (2012). [13] Smolin L., Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to 9

the Future of the Universe (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: [31] Strohmaier A., Verch R., and Wollenberg M., ”Microlo- New York, 2013). cal analysis of quantum fields on curved spacetimes: An- [14] Huang K., Quarks, Leptons and Gauge Fields (World Sci- alytic wave front sets and Reeh-Schlieder theorems”, J. entific: Singapore, 1982). Math. Phys. 43, 5514-5530 (2002). [15] Cheng T.-P. and Li L.-F., Gauge Theory of Elementary [32] Brouder Ch., Dang N.V., and Helein F., ”A smooth intro- Particle Physics (Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1984). duction to the wavefront set”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor [16] Barron L.D., ”Cosmic Chirality both True and False”, 47, 443001 (2014). Chirality 24, 12, 957-958 (2012). [33] Treves F., Introduction to Pseudodifferential and Fourier [17] Shu J. and Zhang Y., ”Impact of a CP-violating Higgs Integral Operators (Plenum Press: New York and Lon- sector: from LHC to baryogenesis”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, don, 1982). 091801 (2013). [34] Dubrovin B.A., Fomenko A.T., and Novikov S.P., Mod- [18] Cirigliano V., Dekens W., de Vries J., and Mereghetti E., ern Geometry – Methods and Applications. Part I. ”Is there room for CP violation in the top-Higgs sector?”, The Geometry of Surfaces, Transformation Groups, and Phys. Rev. D 94, 016002 (2016). Fields. Second Edition (Springer: New York, 1992). [19] Carena M., Ellis J., Lee J.S., Pilaftsis A., and Wag- [35] Hörmander L., The Analysis of Linear Partial Differ- ner C.E.M., ”CP violation in heavy MSSM Higgs ential Operators. Volume 1: Distribution Theory and scenarios”, Journal of High Energy Physics 123, Fourier Analysis. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1985). 10.1007/JHEP02(2016)123, 38 (2016). [36] Hörmander L., The Analysis of Linear Partial Differ- [20] Englert Ch., Nordström K., Sakurai K., and Spannowsky ential Operators. Volume 4: Fourier Integral Operators. M., ”Perturbative Higgs coupling CP violation, unitarity, (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1985). and phenomenology”, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015018 (2017). [37] Davydov A.S., Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press: [21] Goodsell M.D. and Staub F., ”The Higgs mass in the CP Oxford, 1976). violating MSSM, NMSSM and beyond”, Eur. Phys. J. C [38] Englert F. and Brout R., ”Broken symmetry and the 77:46 (2017), DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4495-9. mass of gauge vector mesons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321- [22] Grothendieck A., Eléments de Géométrie Algébrique, 323 (1964). I - IV. Publications Mathématiques de lÍHES, [39] Higgs P.W., ”Broken symmetries, massless particles and 4,8,11,17,20,24,28 and 32 (1961-1967). gauge fields”, Phys. Lett. 12, 132-133 (1964). [23] Cartier P., ”A mad day’s work: From Grothendieck to [40] Higgs P.W., ”Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge Connes and Kontsevich. The evolution of concepts of bosons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508-509 (1964). space and symmetry”, Bulletin of the American Math- [41] Gunion J.F. and Haber H.E., ”CP-conserving two-Higgs- ematical Society 38, 389-408 (2001). doublet model: The approuch to the decoupling limit”, [24] Schwinger J., ”On Green’s functions of quantized fields I Phys. Rev. D 67, 075019 (2003). + II”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 37, 452-459 (1951). [42] Branco G.C., Ferreira P.M., Lavoura L., Rebelo M.N., [25] Vasil’ev A.N., Functional Methods in Quantum Field Sher M., and Silva J.P., ”Theory and phenomenology Theory and Statistics (Gordon and Breach: London, of two-Higgs-doublet models”, Phys. Rep. 516, 1-102 1998). (2012). [26] Lutsev L.V., ”Diagram technique for models with inter- [43] Haber H.E. and Kane G.L., ”The search for supersymme- nal Lie-group dynamics”, J. Phys. A: Mathematical and try: Probing physics beyond the standart model”, Phys. Theoretical 40, 11791-11814 (2007). Rep. 117, 75-263 (1985). [27] Lutsev L.V., in: Mathematical Physics Research Develop- [44] Baer H. and Tata X., Weak Scale Supersymmetry: from ments, Editor: Morris B. Levy, (Nova Science Publishers: Superfields to Scattering Events (Cambridge Univ. Press: New York, 2009) 141-188, ISBN-13: 978-1-60456-963-6. Cambridge, 2006). [28] Hörmander L., ”Fourier integral operators I”, Acta Math. [45] Cox D., Little J., and O’Shea D., Ideals, Varieties, and 127, 79-183 (1971). Algorithms (Springer-Verlag: New York, 1998). [29] Radzikowski M., ”Micro-Local Approach to the [46] Lang S., Algebra. Graduate Texts in Mathematics Hadamard Condition in Quantum Field Theory on (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2002). Curved Space-Time”, Commun. Math. Phys. 179, [47] Mumford D., The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes 529-553 (1996). (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1999). [30] Brunetti R. and Fredenhagen K., ”Microlocal Analysis [48] Eisenbud D. and Harris J., The Geometry of Schemes and Interacting Quantum Field Theories: Renormaliza- (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1998). tion on Physical Backgrounds”, Commun. Math. Phys. 208, 623-661 (2000).